| Revision as of 23:00, 3 November 2021 editPonyo (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators171,645 edits →3RR warning: new sectionTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:50, 4 January 2025 edit undoBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers495,972 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on 2024 United States presidential election in Indiana.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Please remember to ] your messages on ]s by typing four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask for help on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> -- φ ]<sup>]</sup> φ 06:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC) | Please remember to ] your messages on ]s by typing four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask for help on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> -- φ ]<sup>]</sup> φ 06:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == Charles III requested move discussion == | |||
| == 3RR warning == | |||
| There is a ] in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. ] (]) 06:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place == | |||
| ⚫ | ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war |
||
| Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles ] and ]. Cheers. ] (]) 22:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2024 == | |||
| ⚫ | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> – ] (]) 22:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] are you kidding me here? You better be putting a warning on him too or I'll report you. I'm not taking this crap from the likes of you so-called experts. Do you actually value impartiality? Because your actions indicate loud and clear that you don't! ] (]) 22:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] actually, scratch that you ARE the other guy, and you are just as guilty of engaging in a so-called edit war. I want a neutral moderator here as you are clearly incapable of fulfilling this role. ] (]) 22:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == New message to MrJ567 == | |||
| In that case, the next time you revert me fixing something blatantly against site guidelines that you did, you're going straight to ANI about it. I feel it's fair to tell you at least this, but I will not post anything else here, I promise. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 04:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :I see that you are bound and determined to continue this petty little vindictive against me. I'd be happy to report you for harassment as well, so keep that in mind before you go running to the actual administrators of this site. It's abundantly clear that I'm not the only editor who shares this opinion of your conduct. ] (]) 04:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == January 2025 == | |||
| ⚫ | ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ||
| ⚫ | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 04:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:50, 4 January 2025
Welcome!
Hello, MrJ567, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- φ OnePt618 φ 06:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Charles III requested move discussion
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place
Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
November 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Diego Morales (politician). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu are you kidding me here? You better be putting a warning on him too or I'll report you. I'm not taking this crap from the likes of you so-called experts. Do you actually value impartiality? Because your actions indicate loud and clear that you don't! MrJ567 (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu actually, scratch that you ARE the other guy, and you are just as guilty of engaging in a so-called edit war. I want a neutral moderator here as you are clearly incapable of fulfilling this role. MrJ567 (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
New message to MrJ567
In that case, the next time you revert me fixing something blatantly against site guidelines that you did, you're going straight to ANI about it. I feel it's fair to tell you at least this, but I will not post anything else here, I promise. Remsense ‥ 论 04:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are bound and determined to continue this petty little vindictive against me. I'd be happy to report you for harassment as well, so keep that in mind before you go running to the actual administrators of this site. It's abundantly clear that I'm not the only editor who shares this opinion of your conduct. MrJ567 (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
Your recent editing history at 2024 United States presidential election in Indiana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)