| Revision as of 03:03, 5 February 2007 editWjhonson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,811 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:55, 28 December 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,688,721 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with invalid parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
| (16 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|listas=Hearst, George Randolph Iii|blp=Yes|1= |
|
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk oldafd" style="text-align:center;" |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|needs-photo=Yes}} |
|
| width="48px" | ] || This article was nominated for ] {{#if:23 January 2007|on 23 January 2007|recently}}. The result of ] was '''keep'''. |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject New York (state)|Capital=yes|Capital-importance=Low}} |
|
|}<!-- From Template:Oldafdfull --> |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|importance=}} |
|
|
|
{{Old afd|date=23 January 2007|result='''keep'''|page=George_Randolph_Hearst_III}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:George Randolph Hearst III/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
== Notable? == |
|
|
|
==Image Request== |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{image requested|of=]}} |
|
How notable is this person, really? Is there anything that makes him notable - as being related to a ] doesn't do it? Please see ] before replying... <font color="#FF8000">]</font> (] ° ]) 16:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I would agree with you that being related to a famous person wouldn't do it. But being big wig for some big companies? That might do it. -- ] (]) 06:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: He is the Director of the second-largest NBC affiliate owner and the largest ABC affiliate group. He is the member of a family who has their own wikipedia category. <nowiki>]</nowiki> How much more notable would he have to be? ] 23:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::It's up for afd now in any case. <font color="#FF8000">]</font> (] ° ]) 10:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Deletion result changed == |
|
|
Here's why (copied from ]): |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
=== George Randolph Hearst III === |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! In your closing of the ] on ], you confused me. In , you state the result was "keep". When you a few seconds later , you state the result was "no consensus". What's up with that? (I'd rather see it as "no consensus" as then I have some basis for re-nominating it in a few months or so - but if it's a keep I don't think I'll bother.) <font color="#FF8000">]</font> (] ° ]) 22:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I see now that ] had a similar concern. Sorry for the double-post, then. <font color="#FF8000">]</font> (] ° ]) 22:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*Hmmm I dunno, I intended to close it as a keep. What's on the AfD is more important than what's on the talk page, which is unofficial, I just made a mistake apparently. I'll admit this one really could have gone either way, from a pure numerical standpoint at least it could have been either. But I did intend it as a keep. At any rate, it really shouldn't matter that much with a future AfD whether it was a no consensus or a keep. --] 22:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
**Could you please explain what you mean by "from a pure numerical standpoint?" -- ] (]) 22:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
*** More than 66% or so of people wanting to keep is a rule of thumb for a "keep" closure. In the end only 2 people actually wanted to delete the article outright. But it's just a rule of thumb... the numbers alone don't determine the result. --] 22:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
****Thanks. And thanks for the earlier response, too. -- ] (]) 23:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Genealogical Fraud== |
|
|
For details on the genealogical fraud that was attempted, how it is disproven and the action GRH3 took to close down hearstmania.com see ] 03:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
