Misplaced Pages

Scipio Africanus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:04, 5 December 2021 editZLinn1776 (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:03, 3 January 2025 edit undo184.98.59.104 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(262 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Roman general and politician}} {{Short description|Roman general and politician (236/235 – c. 183 BC)}}
{{Other uses|Scipio Africanus (disambiguation)|Publius Cornelius Scipio (disambiguation){{!}}Publius Cornelius Scipio}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2024}}
{{For other uses|Scipio Africanus (disambiguation)|Publius Cornelius Scipio (disambiguation){{!}}Publius Cornelius Scipio}}
{{refimprove|date=December 2021}}
{{Infobox person {{Infobox person
| name = Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus | name = Scipio Africanus
| image = Bust of Sulla (Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen) 2.jpg
| image = ]
| alt = White bust without nose
| image_upright = 1.15
| caption = Bust likely of Scipio Africanus (formerly identified as ]), originally found near ]{{sfn|Etcheto|2012|pp=274–278}}
| alt = Marble bust
| birth_date = 236 or 235 BC
| caption = Roman Sculpture Labeled P•COR•SCIPIO•AFR
| birth_place = ], Roman Republic
| birth_date = 236 or 235 BC
| death_date = {{circa|183 BC}}
| birth_place = ], ], ]
| death_place = ], Roman Republic
| death_date = 183 BC (aged 52–53)
| nationality = Roman
| death_place = ], Italy, Roman Republic
| known_for = Defeating ]
| resting_place =
| credits =
| resting_place_coordinates = <!-- {{coord|LAT|LONG|type:landmark|display=inline}} -->
| nationality = Roman | opponents =
| occupation = General, statesman | spouse = ]
| children = 4, including ]
| known_for = Defeating the Carthaginian general ]
| father = ]
| credits =
| relatives = ] (brother)<br />] (adoptive grandson)<br />] and ] (grandsons)
| office = ] (205, 194 BC)
| opponents = ] | office = {{plainlist|
* Proconsul (Spain, 216–210&nbsp;BC)
| parents = ], Pomponia
* Consul (205&nbsp;BC)
| spouse = ]
* Proconsul (Africa, 204–201&nbsp;BC)
| children = 4, including ]
* Censor (199&nbsp;BC)
| relatives = ] (brother)<br>] (adoptive grandson)<br>] and ] (grandsons)
* Consul (194&nbsp;BC)
| module = {{Infobox military person|embed=yes
* Legate (Asia, 190&nbsp;BC)
| battles = ]<br>• ] (206 BC)<br>• ] (202 BC)<br>]
}}
| battles_label = Wars
| awards = ] | module = {{Infobox office holder|embed=yes
| awards =
| allegiance = Rome
| battles = {{tree list}}
* ]
** ]
**]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
** ]
{{tree list/end}}
| branch = ]
}} }}
}} }}


'''Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|ɪ|p|i|.|oʊ}}, {{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|k|ɪ|p|-}}, {{IPA-la|ˈskiːpioː|lang}}; 236/235–183 BC) was a Roman general and later ] who is often regarded as one of the best ]s and strategists of all time. His main achievements were during the ]. His greatest military achievement was the defeat of ] at the ] (near modern ], Tunisia) in 202 BC. The victory was one of the feats that earned him the ] he is best known for: ''Africanus''. '''Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|k|ɪ|p|.|i|.|oʊ}}, {{IPAc-en|ˈ|s|ɪ|p|-}}, {{IPA|la|ˈskiːpioː|lang}}; 236/235–{{circa|183&nbsp;BC}}) was a Roman general and statesman, who was one of the main architects of Rome's victory against ] in the ]. Often regarded as one of the greatest military commanders and strategists of all time, his greatest military achievement was the defeat of ] at the ] in 202 BC. This victory in Africa earned him the honorific epithet ''Africanus'', literally meaning 'the African', but meant to be understood as a conqueror of ].


Scipio's conquest of ] culminated in the ] (near ], Spain) in 206 BC against Hannibal's brother ]. Although considered a hero by the Roman people, primarily for his victories against Carthage, Africanus had many opponents, especially ], who hated him deeply. In 187 BC, he was tried in a ] alongside his brother for bribes they supposedly received from King ] during the ]. Disillusioned by the ingratitude of his peers, Scipio left Rome and retired from public life at his villa in ]. Scipio's conquest of ] culminated in the ] in 206 BC against Hannibal's brother ]. Although considered a hero by the Roman people, primarily for his victories against Carthage, Scipio had many opponents, especially ], who hated him deeply. In 187 BC, he was tried in a ] alongside his brother for bribes they supposedly received from the Seleucid king ] during the ]. Disillusioned by the ingratitude of his peers, Scipio left Rome and retired from public life at his villa in ].


==Early years== ==Early years==


=== Family ===
Publius Cornelius Scipio was born by ]<ref>{{cite book|author=Pliny|author-link=Pliny the Elder|title=Natural History|chapter=Book VII Chapter 47 (or 9)}}</ref> into the family of the ]. His birth year is calculated from statements made by ancient historians (mainly ] and ]) of how old he was when certain events in his life occurred and must have been 236/5 BC, usually stated as ''circa'' 236 BC.<ref>{{cite book|title=Scipio Africanus in the Second Punic War|first= Howard Hayes|last=Scullard|publisher=University Press|location=Cambridge|year=1930|page=36}}</ref>


Scipio Africanus was born as '''Publius Cornelius Scipio''' in 236&nbsp;BC to his ] and ] into the family of the ].{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=97}} His family was one of the major still-extant ] and had held multiple consulships within living memory: his great-grandfather ] and grandfather ] had both been ] and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Zmeskal|2009|p=92|ps=. Barbatus was consul in 298 and censor in 280; Lucius was consul in 259 and 258&nbsp;BC.}}</ref> His father had held the consulship of 218&nbsp;BC,{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|pp=96–97}} his uncle was consul in 222&nbsp;BC,{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=96}} and his mother's brothers – ] and ] – were both consuls in 233 and 231, respectively.{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=221}}
The Cornelii were one of six major ], along with the ''gentes'' ], ], ], the ], and ], with a record of successful public service in the highest offices extending back at least to the early ].


=== Early military service ===
Scipio's great-grandfather, ], and grandfather ], had both been ] and ]. He was the eldest son of the consul ] by his wife ], daughter of ] consul ].


The ] started in early 218&nbsp;BC when the Roman ultimatum to ] demanding that ] withdraw from ] in Spain was rejected.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=45}} Scipio's father was consul that year{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=237}} and the younger Scipio joined him in the campaign to stop Hannibal's march on Italy. In a ] between Scipio's father and Hannibal at the river Ticinus near modern ],{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=49}} Polybius claims that the son saved his father's life after the father was encircled by enemy horsemen.<ref>{{harvnb|Briscoe|2012}}; {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=10.3.5}}. ], writing in the 1st century AD, mentions that Scipio refused the ] for the deed. {{harvnb|Goldsworthy|2003|p=53|ps=, citing Plin. ''NH'', 16.14}}.</ref> Other sources credit an unnamed Ligurian slave.{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=53}}
Scipio was a member of the ], the college of priests of ].<ref>Livy, ].</ref><ref>Broughton, vol. I, p. 360.</ref>


Two years later, in 216&nbsp;BC, Scipio served as ]. He survived the disastrous ] – his father-in-law, the consul ], was there slain{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=53}} – and, after the battle, rallied survivors at ].{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=251}} According to Livy, when he heard that Lucius Caecilius Metellus and other young nobles were discussing a plan to abandon the republic and go overseas to serve as mercenaries, Scipio stormed into the meeting and forced all of them at sword-point to swear to Jupiter and the Capitoline triad that they would never abandon Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Livy|loc=22.53}}. See also, on Metellus, {{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=260}}.</ref> This story is probably a late invention, as it does not appear in Polybius.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ridley |first=R T |date=1975 |title=Was Scipio Africanus at Cannae? |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41529611 |journal=Latomus |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=161–165 |jstor=41529611 |issn=0023-8856 }} Ridley cites {{harvnb|Scullard|1929|p=38}}. </ref>
==Early military service==
Scipio joined the Roman struggle against ] in the first year of the ] when his father was consul. During the ], he saved his ] life by "charging the encircling force alone with reckless daring."<ref>Polybius, The Histories 10.3.5.</ref>


The next year, in 213&nbsp;BC, he was elected ] and served with his cousin ].<ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=263}}. {{harvnb|Livy|loc=25.2.6}}, wrongly dates this to 212&nbsp;BC; patricians held the curule aedileship in odd years, implying 213. Broughton also dismisses the "story that Scipio won election both for himself and his brother" – originating in {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=10.4–5}} – as "intrinsically improbable" and notes its general scholarly rejection. {{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=267 n. 4}}.</ref> His candidacy was opposed by one of the plebeian tribunes on the grounds that he had not yet reached the minimum age, but the voters expressed such enthusiastic support for Scipio that the tribune desisted.<ref>{{harvnb|Livy|loc=25.2|ps=. Livy also records Scipio's response: "If the Quirites are unanimous in their desire to appoint me aedile, I am quite old enough".}}</ref>
He survived the disaster at the ], where his would-be father-in-law, the consul ], was killed. After the battle, with the other consul surviving elsewhere, Scipio and ], as ]s, took charge of some 10,360 survivors. On hearing that ] and other young nobles were planning to go overseas to serve some king, Scipio stormed into the meeting, and at sword-point, forced all present to swear that they would not abandon Rome.<ref>Livy, History of Rome 22.53.</ref>


== Second Punic War ==
Scipio offered himself as a candidate for ] in 213 BC alongside his cousin ].<ref>Livy 25.2.6. "The story that Scipio won election both for himself and his brother is intrinsically improbable, and despite the authority of Polybius (10.4–5), has been generally rejected." See Broughton, vol. 1, p. 267.</ref> The ] objected to his candidacy, saying that he could not be allowed to stand because he had not yet reached the legal age. Scipio, already known for his bravery and patriotism, was elected unanimously and the Tribunes abandoned their opposition. His cousin also won the election.<ref>Livy 25.2.6–7.</ref>


==Campaign in Hispania== === Campaign in Hispania ===
]
]'s painting of ''the Continence of Scipio'', depicting his return of a captured young woman to her fiancé, having refused to accept her from his troops as a prize of war.]]
] (245–207 BC), one of Hannibal's younger brothers, wearing a '']'']] ] (245–207 BC), one of Hannibal's younger brothers, wearing a '']'']]
In 211 BC, both Scipio's father, Publius Scipio, and uncle, ], were killed at the ] in Spain against Hannibal's brother, ]. At the election of a new ] for the command of the new army which the Romans resolved to send to ], Scipio was the only man brave enough to ask for this position, no other candidates wanting the responsibility, considering it a death sentence.<ref>Livy, Book XXVI, Chapter 18 "...declaring himself a candidate, took his station on an eminence from which he could be seen by all."</ref> In spite of his youth (25 years), his noble demeanour and enthusiastic language had made so great an impression that he was unanimously elected. In the year of Scipio's arrival (211 BC),<ref>Livy 26, 19, 11</ref> all of Hispania south of the ] river was under Carthaginian control. Hannibal's brothers Hasdrubal and ], and ] were the generals of the Carthaginian forces in Hispania, and Rome was aided by the inability of these three figures to act in concert. The Carthaginians were also preoccupied with revolts in Africa.


From the start of the war through to 211&nbsp;BC, Scipio's father, Publius Cornelius Scipio, and uncle – ] – were in command of Rome's armies in Spain. They made some headway when the Carthaginians were forced to withdraw a considerable portion of their forces to handle a revolt by ]. Through the seven years from 218, the brothers had successfully extended Roman control deep into Carthaginian territory.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=57}} However, disaster struck in 211&nbsp;BC when the brothers divided their forces to attack three separate Carthaginian armies were ]. The brothers fell in separate battles against the Carthaginians, who were led by ], ], and ]; the two Barcas were Hannibal's brothers.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|pp=57–59}}
Scipio landed at the mouth of the ] and was able to surprise and capture ] (New Carthage), the headquarters of the Carthaginian power in Hispania. He obtained a rich cache of war stores and supplies and an excellent harbour and base of operations. Scipio's humanitarian conduct toward prisoners and hostages in Hispania helped in portraying the Romans as liberators as opposed to conquerors. Livy tells the story of his troops capturing a beautiful woman, whom they offered to Scipio as a prize of war. Scipio was astonished by her beauty but discovered that the woman was betrothed to a ] chieftain named ]. He returned the woman to her fiancé, along with the money that had been offered by her parents to ransom her. This humanitarian act encouraged local chieftains to both supply and reinforce Scipio's small army. The woman's fiancé, who soon married her, responded by bringing over his tribe to support the Roman armies.<ref>], '']'' xxvi. 50</ref>


Initially, Gaius Claudius Nero – who was praetor in 212&nbsp;BC – was sent to contain the situation.<ref>{{harvnb|Briscoe|1989|p=59}}, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=35.32–39}}.</ref> But in 210&nbsp;BC, the assembly elected Scipio to take command.{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=280}} Modern scholars dismiss the Livian narrative of senatorial indecision and have instead suggested that the senate chose Scipio but forced a popular vote to legitimise an irregular command.{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=56}} Giving Scipio command was an extraordinary act, as he at this point had never held a praetorship or consulship, but was regardless granted ''imperium pro consule'', taking command on his arrival to Spain in the early autumn.{{sfnm|Briscoe|1989|1p=59|Broughton|1951|2p=280}} He was the first person to have been given proconsular imperium without having held consular office.{{sfn|Briscoe|2012}} He went to Spain with some 10,000 reinforcements{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=56}} and was joined by another commander, ], who was dispatched ''pro praetore'' and soon assumed command of Nero's army.{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=280}}
In 209 BC, Scipio fought his first ], driving back Hasdrubal Barca from his position at ] on the upper ]. Scipio feared that the armies of Mago and Gisco would enter the field and surround his small army. Scipio's objective was, therefore, to quickly eliminate one of the armies to give him the luxury of dealing with the other two piecemeal. The battle was decided by a determined Roman infantry charge up the centre of the Carthaginian position. Roman losses are uncertain but may have been considerable in light of an effort by the infantry to scale an elevation defended by Carthaginian light infantry. Scipio then orchestrated a frontal attack by the rest of his infantry to draw out the remainder of the Carthaginian forces.


Seeking to defeat the three Carthaginian armies in detail,{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=56}} the next year, 209&nbsp;BC, saw Scipio's first major campaign: he besieged ] (modern Cartagena), which was a major Carthaginian logistics hub and of substantial strategic importance. In the ], he captured the city by sending a wading party across the lagoon to the city's north when it reached low tide, he told the troops that he had a vision in which the god ] had promised aid; this alleged vision played a role in the rapid development of a Scipionic legend around him and his family.<ref>{{harvnb|Briscoe|1989|p=59|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=26.17–20}}. }}</ref> Storming the city rapidly and with little ability to tell combatants and civilians apart, Scipio ordered his men to massacre all they encountered and pillage any structures; Polybius viewed the massacre as intended to terrorise the Spanish population into rapidly surrendering and included an anecdote of Romans being so thorough as to cut even the dogs and other animals in half.{{sfn|Polyb.|loc=10.15.4–5}} He then forced the surrender of Mago in the citadel and rapidly switched his tune, sparing the remaining citizens and only enslaving the town's non-citizens. He then took the three hundred Spanish hostages into his custody, giving them gifts, guaranteeing their safety and that of their families, and promising them freedom if their respective communities would ally with Rome.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Baker |first=Gabriel David |title=Spare no one: mass violence in Roman warfare |date=2021 |isbn=978-1-5381-1221-2 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |location=Lanham |series=War and Society |oclc=1182021748 |pages=118–120 }}</ref>
Hasdrubal had not noticed Scipio's hidden reserves of cavalry moving behind enemy lines, and a Roman cavalry charge created a double envelopment on either flank led by cavalry commander ] and Scipio himself. This broke the back of Hasdrubal's army and routed his forces—an impressive feat for the young Roman versus the veteran Carthaginian general. Despite a Roman victory, Scipio was unable to hinder the Carthaginian march to Italy. Much historical criticism has been levelled at his inability to effectively pursue Hasdrubal, who would eventually cross the Alps only to be defeated by ] at the ].


After the battle, several Spanish tribes defected to the Romans. The next year, 208&nbsp;BC, ] north of the ], near Baecula. While Scipio was victorious, the battle was indecisive and Hasdrubal escaped north with most of his army across the ] for Italy;{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|pp=59–60}} Hasdrubal and his army reached Italy in 207, where they were eventually defeated in the ] with the army destroyed and Hasdrubal slain.<ref>{{harvnb|Briscoe|1989|p=55|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=26.38–39, 27.1–2, 27.12–16}}. }}</ref> The following year, Hasdrubal was replaced by a certain Hanno, who was captured by Junius Silanus in ]. Following the army under Hasdrubal, son of Gisgo, which retreated to Gades (modern ]), Scipio's brother took Orongis (modern ]) before a decisive victory in 206&nbsp;BC at the ], north of modern ], forced the Carthaginians to withdraw from the peninsula.<ref>{{harvnb|Briscoe|1989|p=60|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=11.20–24}}; {{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.1–28.4.4, 12.10–16, 19–21}}. }}</ref> In mopping-up operations, Scipio captured Ilourgeia and Castulo, inflicting severe punishment on the former for having killed refugees from his army. Other Roman commanders captured other towns in Spain, including Astapa, whose inhabitants committed mass suicide.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=60}} After a quickly-suppressed revolt by Spanish tribes when false rumours of Scipio's death from illness spread, he crossed into Africa to solicit the support of Syphax and thence into western Hispania to meet Massinissa for the same purpose.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=62}} Syphax pledged loyalty but eventually joined with the Carthaginians; Massinissa, however, joined with the Romans with a small contingent when Syphax expelled him the kingdom of ].{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=63}} Meanwhile, Gades surrendered to the Romans.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|pp=60–61}}
One popular theory for Scipio's failure to pursue Hasdrubal is that Scipio merely wanted the glory of securing Hispania, and an extended mountain campaign would have endangered that. Others cite the Roman soldiers' appetite for plunder as preventing him from rallying in pursuit. The most probable explanation from a strategic standpoint is Scipio's unwillingness to risk being trapped between Hasdrubal's army on one side and one or both of Gisgo's and Mago's armies, both of superior numerical strength. Mere days after Hasdrubal's defeat, Mago and Gisgo were able to converge in front of the Roman positions, bringing into question what would have happened had Scipio pursued Hasdrubal.


Some time {{circa|206&nbsp;BC}}, Scipio also founded the town of ] (located about 9&nbsp;km northwest of Seville), which later became the birthplace of the emperors, ], ], and ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Canto |first=Alicia M |date=2004 |title=Itálica, sedes natalis de Adriano. 31 textos históricos y argumentos para una secular polémica (2004) |url=https://www.academia.edu/1082511 |journal=Athenaeum |volume=92 |pages=367–408 |language=es }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Canto |first=Alicia M |date=2006 |title=Sobre el origen bético de Teodosio I el Grande, y su improbable nacimiento en Cauca de Gallaecia (2006) |url=https://www.academia.edu/1075565 |journal=Latomus |volume=65 |issue=2 |language=es |pages=388–421 }}</ref>
After winning over a number of Hispanian chiefs (namely ]), Scipio achieved a decisive victory in 206 BC over the full Carthaginian levy at ] (now the city of ], near ], now called ]), which resulted in the evacuation of Hispania by the Punic commanders.


With a general victory across the peninsula, Scipio then returned to Rome to stand for the consulship of 205&nbsp;BC, leaving ] and ] in command.<ref>{{harvnb|Briscoe|1989|pp=60–61|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.38.1}} for the turnover in command. }}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|pp=299–300|ps=, noting Lentulus was another ''privatus cum imperio''; both Lentulus and Acidinus were prorogued ''pro consule''}}. Lentulus and Acidinus are those reported at {{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.38.1}}; {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=11.33.8}} instead has Scipio leave Silanus and Lucius Marcius Septimius – one of Scipio's legates – in command.</ref> He returned to Rome late in the year; according to Livy he was denied a triumph,<ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=299|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.38.4, 31.20.3}}; {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=11.33.7}}; App. ''Hisp.'', 38. Broughton also suggests the possibility of an ]}}.</ref> on the grounds that he was ''privatus'' – that is, ''sine magistratu'' – and had never been elected to a magistracy with ].<ref>{{harvnb|Gruen|1995|p=61 n. 3|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.38.2–4}}; {{harvnb|Val. Max.|loc=2.8.5}}; Dio, 17.57.6. }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Richardson |first=J S |date=1975 |title=The triumph, the praetors and the senate in the early second century BC |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/370063 |journal=Journal of Roman Studies |volume=65 |pages=50–63 |doi=10.2307/370063 |jstor=370063 |s2cid=163561022 |issn=0075-4358}}</ref>
After his rapid success in conquering Hispania, and with the idea of striking a blow at Carthage in ], Scipio paid a short visit to the ]n princes ] and ]. Numidia was of vital importance to Carthage, supplying both mercenaries and allied forces. In addition to supplying the ] (on which see the ]), Numidia operated as a buffer for vulnerable Carthage. Scipio managed to receive support from both Syphax and Massinissa. Syphax later changed his mind, married the beautiful Carthaginian noblewoman ], daughter of Hasdrubal the son of Gisco, and fought alongside his Carthaginian in-laws against Massinissa and Scipio in Africa.


=== African campaign ===
In circa 206 BC Scipio founded the settlement of ] 9&nbsp;km northwest of ] in southern ], in the province of ]. It became the birthplace of Roman Emperors ], ],<ref>Alicia M. Canto, , ''Athenaeum. Studi di letteratura e Storia dell'Antichità'' 92.2, 2004, 367–408. {{In lang|es}}</ref> and ] (possibly).<ref>Alicia M. Canto , ''Latomus. Revue d'Études Latines'' 65.2, 2006,388-421.</ref>
] possibly depicting ] as ] (i.e. ])]]


Scipio was elected unanimously to the consulship of 205&nbsp;BC amid much enthusiasm;<ref>{{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.38|ps=. "ll the centuries voted amidst much enthusiasm for Scipio... It is recorded that a larger number of voters took part in that election than at any other time during the war. They had come from all parts, not only to give their votes, but also to get sight of Scipio".}}</ref> he was 31 and still technically too young to be consul.{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=51}} When he entered into office, he demanded that the senate assign him the province of Africa and threatened to take the matter to the popular assemblies if it refused to do so. Despite fierce opposition from the princeps senatus, ], the senate bowed to his pressure and he received Sicily with permission to cross into Africa if he wished.<ref>{{harvnb|Drogula|2015|pp=285, 298–299 n. 4 |ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=28.40.1–2}} and Plut. ''Fab.'', 25.2.}}</ref>{{sfnm|Briscoe|1989|1p=63|Broughton|1951|2p=301}} Fabius' opposition may have been related to jealousy of Scipio's popularity, but also was likely informed by the failed African campaign {{circa|255&nbsp;BC}} under ] during the ], which saw the Carthaginians' war efforts renewed.{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=75}} The senate, regardless, assigned Scipio no additional soldiers, leading him to recruit an army of volunteers;{{sfn|Drogula|2015|p=136}} Livy reports that from his clients and supporters in Italy, he mustered some 30 warships and 7,000 men.{{sfn|Livy|loc=28.45–46}}
On his return to Hispania, Scipio had to quell a ] which had broken out among his troops. Hannibal's brother Hasdrubal had meanwhile marched for Italy, and in 206 BC Scipio himself, having secured the Roman occupation of Hispania by the capture of ], gave up his command and returned to Rome.


He spent most of his consulship preparing his troops in Sicily for the invasion of Africa. He captured ] on the toe of Italy that year, and left one Pleminius in command there.{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=301}} After Pleminius assumed command, he robbed the city's temple and tortured and killed two military tribunes.{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=304}} For these crimes, the senate had Pleminius placed under arrest; Scipio was also implicated but was cleared the next year.{{sfnm|Goldsworthy|2003|1p=76|Broughton|1951|2p=308}}
==African campaign==
] possibly depicting ] as ] (i.e. ])]]
In 205 BC, Scipio was unanimously elected to ] at the age of 31. Scipio intended to go to ], but due to the envy of others in the Senate, he was not given any additional troops beyond the Sicilian garrison. Despite this resistance, Scipio gathered resources from clients and supporters in Rome and among the Italian communities; this allowed him to muster a volunteer force of 30 warships and 7000 men.<ref>], '']'' xxviii.45–46.</ref>


==== Invasion of Africa ====
The forces stationed in Sicily at this time included a variety of forces. The Romans had for a long time used service in Sicily as a punishment, with the result that the garrison in Sicily contained survivors from many of the greatest Roman military fiascos in the war, such as the ]. Having served with these men at Cannae, Scipio was well aware that their disgrace was through no fault of their own. In addition, the Sicilian garrison also contained many of the troops who had participated in the Sicilian campaigns of ]. From these men, Scipio was able to muster a highly motivated and very experienced force for his African invasion.<ref>], '']'' xxix.1, xxix.25.</ref> Scipio turned Sicily into a camp for training his army.


His imperium was prorogued into 205&nbsp;BC and in that year, he crossed with his men into Africa and ] ] before withdrawing and pretending in the winter to negotiate with the Carthaginians.<ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=308|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=29.24–36, 30.3.3–30.4.12}}. }}</ref> During those pretended negotiations, Scipio mapped out the enemy camps and launched a ] that was successful in destroying them and killing a large number of the enemy.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=63}} The armies then fought in the ] some time early in the new year (his ''imperium'' was prorogued until the war's completion) and after capturing Syphax of Numidia, restored Massinissa to the kingdom.{{sfnm|Briscoe|1989|1p=63|Broughton|1951|2p=312}} The Carthaginians reacted to the defeat by recalling their generals Hannibal and Mago from Italy and launching their fleet against Scipio's to cut off their supply lines. Scipio was forced into a naval battle near Utica, but was able to avert disaster, losing only some sixty transport ships.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|p=63}} Another set of peace negotiations occurred, with the Carthaginians eventually agreeing to abandon all territorial claims in the Mediterranean and beyond, limit her rights to expand in Africa, recognize Massinissa's kingdom, give up all but twenty of her ships, and pay a war indemnity. However, during the negotiations, the Carthaginians – suffering from starvation – attacked a Roman food convoy, leading to protests to be sent and envoys exchanged.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|pp=63–64}}
Scipio realized that the Carthaginian forces—especially the superior Numidian cavalry—would prove decisive against the largely infantry forces of the Roman legions. In addition, a large portion of Rome's cavalry were allies of questionable loyalty, or noble ] exempting themselves from being lowly foot soldiers. One anecdote tells of how Scipio pressed into service several hundred Sicilian nobles to create a cavalry force. The Sicilians were quite opposed to this servitude to a foreign occupier (Sicily being under Roman control only since the ]), and protested vigorously. Scipio assented to their exemption from service providing they pay for a horse, equipment, and a replacement rider for the Roman army. In this way, Scipio created a trained nucleus of cavalry for his African campaign.


Amid further attempts to remove him from command – one of the consuls of 203&nbsp;BC, ], attempted to substitute himself for Scipio to claim credit for the final blow against Carthage;<ref>{{harvnb|Drogula|2015|p=313|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=30.24.1–4}}}}; {{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=311}}</ref> the consuls of 202&nbsp;BC coveted the African command for the same reason<ref>{{harvnb|Drogula|2015|p=134 n. 11|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=30.27.1–4}}}}. Scipio's position was regardless confirmed by plebiscite in Rome. {{harvnb|Broughton|1951|pp=317, 320}}.</ref> – Scipio refused peace terms at a parley with Hannibal in 202&nbsp;BC. With the support of Masinissa's Numidian cavalry, the ] was fought shortly after; the Romans won{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=76}} and Carthage then again sued for peace.{{sfnm|Briscoe|1989|1p=64|Broughton|1951|2p=317}}
], Scipio Africanus is shown releasing the nephew of the Prince of Numidia after he was captured by Roman soldiers.<ref>{{cite web |publisher= ]
|url= http://art.thewalters.org/detail/19755
|title= Scipio Africanus Freeing Massiva}}</ref> ].]]The ] sent a commission of inquiry to Sicily and found Scipio at the head of a well-equipped and trained fleet and army. Scipio pressed the Senate for permission to cross into Africa. Some of the Roman Senate, championed by ] Cunctator ("the Delayer"), opposed the mission. Fabius still feared Hannibal's power, and viewed any mission to Africa as dangerous and wasteful to the war effort.<ref>Plutarch, Fabius, 25, 26.</ref> Scipio was also harmed by some senators' disdain of his ideals, beliefs, and interests in unconventional areas such as ] tastes in art, luxuries, and philosophies. All Scipio could obtain was permission to cross over from Sicily to Africa if it appeared to be in the interests of Rome, but not financial or military support.


In the new year, 201&nbsp;BC, Scipio remained in Africa to conclude negotiations, which saw Carthage's territory kept to the status quo ante bellum, Carthage restore to the Romans all captured goods and persons, Carthaginian disarmament of all but ten triremes, and Carthage needing to ask for Roman permission to make any war. Massinissa's territory in Numidia was to be confirmed; and a war indemnity of 10,000 talents was to be paid over the next fifty years.{{sfn|Briscoe|1989|pp=64–65}} Although the consul of 201&nbsp;BC, ] attempted to oppose the peace so that he could continue the war in Scipio's place, the peace terms were ratified by the assembly in Rome, bringing the war to a final close.{{sfnm|Briscoe|1989|1p=65|Broughton|1951|2p=319}}
With the permission from the commissioners, Scipio sailed in 204 BC and landed near ]. Carthage, meanwhile, had secured the friendship of the ] Syphax, whose advance compelled Scipio to abandon the ] and dig in on the shore between there and Carthage. In 203 BC, he ] the combined armies of the Carthaginians and Numidians by approaching by stealth and setting fire to their camp, where the combined army became panicked and fled, when they were mostly killed by Scipio's army. Though it was not a "battle," both Polybius and Livy estimate that the death toll in this single attack exceeded 40,000 Carthaginian and Numidian dead, and more captured.


==== Return ====
Historians are roughly equal in their praise and condemnation for this act. Polybius said, "of all the brilliant exploits performed by Scipio this seems to me the most brilliant and more adventurous." On the other hand, one of Hannibal's principal biographers, ], goes so far as to suggest that this attack was out of cowardice and spares no more than a page upon the event in total, despite the fact that it secured the siege of Utica and effectively put Syphax out of the war. The irony of Dodge's accusations of Scipio's cowardice is that the attack showed traces of Hannibal's penchant for ambush.


On his return, Scipio celebrated a ] over Hannibal, the Carthaginians, and Syphax. There, he took the ] ''Africanus'' ('the African'), for his victories.<ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=321|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=16.23.5}}.}}</ref> By this point, Scipio's career reached far beyond his peers even though he was only in his early thirties.{{sfn|Goldsworthy|2003|p=76}} On his return, he deposited some 123,000 pounds of silver into the ] and distributed 400 ] each to his soldiers.<ref>{{harvnb|Gruen|1995|p=70}}, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=30.45.3}}.</ref>
Scipio quickly dispatched his two lieutenants, ] and ], to pursue Syphax. They ultimately dethroned Syphax, and ensured Prince Masinissa's coronation as King of the Numidians. Carthage, and especially Hannibal himself, had long relied upon these superb natural horsemen, who would now fight for Rome against Carthage.


His popularity among the plebs was also astonishing – the Scipionic legend, which in later forms depicted him a son of Jupiter – and heralded great political success.{{sfn|Briscoe|2012}} This success, however, turned many Roman aristocrats into his enemies, largely to oppose his further aggrandisement or out of jealousy. Even during his consulship, he had been opposed by Fabius Maximus and others, especially after stories circulated of his being saluted as king and god in Spain.{{sfnm|Briscoe|1989|1pp=74, 73|Briscoe|2012}} His intended role in Roman politics, however, remained traditional.{{sfn|Briscoe|2012}}
===War with Hannibal, the Battle of Zama===
]


== Later life ==
Now deserted by its allies and surrounded by a veteran and undefeated Roman army, Carthage began opening diplomatic channels for negotiation. At the same time, Hannibal Barca and his army were recalled to Carthage, and despite the moderate terms offered to Carthage by Scipio, Carthage suddenly suspended negotiations and again prepared for war. The army that Hannibal returned with is a subject of much debate. Advocates for Hannibal often claim that his army was mostly Italians pressed into service from southern Italy and that most of his elite veterans (and certainly cavalry) were spent. Scipio's advocates tend to be far more suspicious and believe the number of veteran forces to remain significant.
] dated mid-first century BC, formerly identified as Scipio Africanus, now thought to portray a priest of ]]]


=== Censorship and second consulship ===
Hannibal did have a trained pool of soldiers who had fought in Italy, as well as eighty war elephants. Hannibal could boast a strength of around forty thousand: 36,000 infantry and 4,000 cavalry, compared to Scipio's 29,000 infantry and 6,100 cavalry.<ref>Lazenby, Hannibal's War, pp. 220–221</ref> The two generals met on a plain between Carthage and Utica on October 19, 202 BC, at the final ]. Despite mutual admiration, negotiations floundered due largely to Roman distrust of the Carthaginians as a result of the Carthaginian attack on ], the breach of protocols which ended the First Punic War (known as ''Punic Faith''), and a perceived breach in contemporary military etiquette due to Hannibal's numerous ambushes.


In the year 199&nbsp;BC, Scipio was elected ] with ] as his colleague. Their censorship was largely unremarkable, but saw Scipio named as ], a title which he retained for the next two ''lustra''.{{sfnm|Broughton|1951|1p=327|Briscoe|2012}} After this point, the classicist ] believed that Scipio's political position entered an eclipse.{{sfn|Scullard|1970|p=191}} This is disputed.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gruen |first=Erich S |date=1972 |title=Review of "Scipio Africanus: Soldier and Politician" |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/293271 |journal=American Journal of Philology |volume=93 |issue=2 |pages=377–380 |doi=10.2307/293271 |jstor=293271 |issn=0002-9475}} Gruen writes also "there is no hint of an eclipse" politically and calls Scullard's inference that there was one "unfounded".</ref>
Hannibal arranged his infantry in three phalangial lines designed to overlap the Roman lines. His tactics, so often reliant upon subtlety, were simple: a massive forward attack by the war elephants would create gaps in the Roman lines, which would be exploited by the infantry, supported by the cavalry.


After the required ten years between consulships had elapsed, Scipio secured election to the consulship of 194&nbsp;BC. During his second consulship, he wanted to succeed ] in Greece and advocated for a stronger Roman presence in the Aegean to guard against ], but was unsuccessful.{{sfn|Briscoe|2012}} He instead fought the ] and ] in northern Italy,{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=343}} against whom the Romans had been continuously campaigning since 201&nbsp;BC.<ref>{{harvc |last=Harris |first=W V |c=Roman expansion in the west |in=CAH<sup>2</sup> 8 |year=1989 |page=110 }} "The reimposition of Roman power in northern Italy had a high priority, and each year from 201 to 190 the senate assigned one or both consuls to that region".</ref> Scipio let his co-consul, ], take the leading role in the fighting and returned to Rome to hold the consular elections.<ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|pp=343, 346 n. 1|ps=, noting also that both Plutarch and Nepos confuse Scipio Africanus with Scipio Nasica in this year. }}</ref>
]
Rather than arranging his forces in the traditional manipular lines, which put the ], ], and ] in succeeding lines parallel to the enemy's line, Scipio instead put the ] in lines perpendicular to the enemy, a stratagem designed to counter the war elephants. When the Carthaginian elephants charged, they found well laid traps before the Roman position and were greeted by Roman trumpeters, which drove many back out of confusion and fear. In addition, many elephants were goaded harmlessly through the loose ranks by the ] and other skirmishers. Roman javelins were used to good effect, and the sharp traps caused further disorder among the elephants. Many of them were so distraught that they charged back into their own lines. The Roman infantry was greatly rattled by the elephants, but Massinissa's Numidian and Laelius' Roman cavalry began to drive the opposing cavalry off the field. Both cavalry commanders pursued their routing Carthaginian counterparts, leaving the Carthaginian and Roman infantries to engage one another. The resulting infantry clash was fierce and bloody, with neither side achieving local superiority. The Roman infantry had driven off the two front lines of the Carthaginian army, and in the respite took an opportunity to drink water. The Roman army was then drawn up in one long line (as opposed to the traditional three lines) in order to match the length of Hannibal's line. Scipio's army then marched towards Hannibal's veterans, who had not yet taken part in the battle. The final struggle was bitter and won only when the allied cavalry rallied and returned to the battle field. Charging the rear of Hannibal's army, they caused what many historians have called the "Roman Cannae".


In 193&nbsp;BC, Scipio is said to have taken part in two embassies. The first was to Africa, where he was one of three sent to arbitrate a boundary dispute between Carthage and Masinissa: the commission left the matter undecided, possibly on purpose.{{sfnm|Briscoe|2012|Broughton|1951|2p=348}} The second embassy is said to have been to Asia and, on the basis of travel time, could not have happened. During the alleged embassy, Scipio is apocryphally said to have discussed the best generals with Hannibal at Ephesus.{{sfnm|Briscoe|2012|Broughton|1951|2pp=348–349}}<ref>{{harvnb|Goldsworthy|2003|p=77}}, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=35.14}}.</ref>
Many Roman aristocrats, especially Cato, expected Scipio to raze that city to the ground after his victory. However, Scipio dictated extremely moderate terms in contrast to an immoderate Roman Senate. While the security of Rome was guaranteed by demands such as the surrender of the fleet, and a lasting tribute was to be paid, the strictures were sufficiently light for Carthage to regain its full prosperity.<ref name="Scipio">{{cite book|title=Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon|last=Liddell Hart|first=Basil|year=1992|isbn=1-85367-132-0|pages=2–10, 24, 25, 200–207|orig-year=1926}}</ref> With Scipio's consent, Hannibal was allowed to become the civic leader of Carthage, which the Cato family did not forget.


===Return to Rome=== === War with Antiochus ===
] ({{circa|1800}}).]]
Scipio was welcomed back to Rome in triumph with the ] of ''Africanus''. He refused the many further honours which the people would have thrust upon him such as Consul for life and Dictator. In the year 199 BC, Scipio was elected Censor and for some years afterwards he lived quietly and took no part in politics.


In 192&nbsp;BC, Rome declared war on Antiochus,{{sfn|Errington|1989|p=283}} who – after a cold war with the Romans starting from the close of the ] through to 193&nbsp;BC – had invaded Greece.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Griffith |first1=G T |last2=Sherwin-White |first2=S M |last3=van der Spek |first3=R J |chapter=Antiochus (3) III |date=2012 |url=https://oxfordre.com/classics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-505 |title=Oxford Classical Dictionary |publisher=Oxford University Press |language=en |doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.505 |isbn=978-0-19-938113-5 }}</ref> Antiochus' initial push into Greece was met with little enthusiasm by the locals, who were well-treated in a peaceful and largely open interstate system in the aftermath of the Roman proclamation of Greek freedom. It did not help that the cities that he did take had to be taken by force.{{sfn|Errington|1989|p=283}} The consul of 191&nbsp;BC, ], arrived in the spring and promptly defeated Antiochus at the ] – Antiochus lost the battle and was forced back across the Aegean to ] within six months of the war's start.{{sfn|Errington|1989|p=284}}
In 193 BC, Scipio was one of the commissioners sent to Africa to settle a dispute between Massinissa and the Carthaginians, which the commission did not achieve. This may have been because Hannibal, in the service of ] of ], might have come to Carthage to gather support for a new attack on Italy. In 190 BC, when the Romans declared war against Antiochus III, Publius offered to join his brother ] if the Senate entrusted the chief command to him. The two brothers brought the war to a conclusion by a decisive victory at ] in the same year.


The consul of 190&nbsp;BC was Scipio Africanus' brother, ], who was assigned by the senate to Greece with permission to cross into Asia. He appointed his older brother, Scipio Africanus, as one of his legates.{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=356, 358}} While en route, Roman armies and fleets quickly overwhelmed Antiochus' defences, forcing him to retreat from the ] and ]; by October 190&nbsp;BC, when the Scipios arrived, the Romans had an army in Asia minor. Antiochus offered terms – a war indemnity to cover half the cost of the war and abandonment of his claims to Smyrna, Lapsacus, Alexandria Troas, and other towns – but the Scipiones rejected the offer based on the Roman war aim of reshaping to their benefit the Aegean balance of power. They responded by demanding Antiochus cede all territory to the Taurus mountains and pay an indemnity covering the entire cost of the war; the demands were so extreme he immediately broke off negotiations. Late in the year, around mid-December, Antiochus' forces ]; even though they outnumbered the Romans and allies by at least two to one, Antiochus' army of some 60,000 men was routed.{{sfn|Errington|1989|p=286}}
==Retirement==
] of an older Scipio Africanus]]


Shortly before Magnesia, Antiochus offered Scipio Africanus a bribe to secure favourable peace terms, which Africanus rejected. At the battle itself, he claimed illness, but was selected to present the Roman peace terms regardless.{{sfn|Briscoe|2012}} The credit for the victory accrued to his brother and commander, Lucius. The peace terms presented at Sardis were largely the Roman demands prior to the battle: Antiochus would cede all territory outside the Taurus line (eventually determined to be from Cape Sarpedon in ] through to the ]),{{sfn|Errington|1989|p=288}} pay a war indemnity of 15,000 talents to Rome with a separate 400 talents to Eumenes, all exiles and enemies of Rome would be handed over (including Hannibal) along with twenty hostages (including Antiochus' youngest son).{{sfn|Errington|1989|pp=286–287}}
Scipio's political enemies, led by ], gained ground. When the Scipiones returned to Rome, two ]s prosecuted (187 BC) Lucius on the grounds of misappropriation of money received from Antiochus.{{citation needed|date=October 2013}} As Lucius was in the act of producing his account-books, his brother wrested them from his hands, tore them in pieces, and flung them on the floor of the Senate house. Scipio then allegedly asked the courts why they were concerned about how 3,000 ] had been spent and apparently unconcerned about how 15,000 talents were entering the state coffers (the tribute that Antiochus was paying Rome after his defeat by Lucius).{{citation needed|date=October 2013}} This high-handed act shamed the prosecution, and it appears that the case against Lucius was dismissed, though Lucius would again be prosecuted, and this time convicted, after the death of Scipio.{{citation needed|date=October 2013}}


=== Trials of the Scipios ===
Scipio himself was subsequently (185 BC) accused of having been bribed by Antiochus.<ref name=encarta2008>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Scipio Africanus the Elder|encyclopedia=Encarta|publisher=Microsoft Corporation|year=2008}}</ref> By reminding the people that it was the anniversary of his victory at Zama, he caused an outburst of enthusiasm in his favour. The people crowded round him and followed him to the Capitol, where they offered thanks to the gods and begged them to give Rome more citizens like Scipio Africanus. Despite the popular support that Scipio commanded, there were renewed attempts to bring him to trial, but these appear to have been deflected by his future son-in-law, ].<ref>Livy, ''History of Rome'', XXXVIII, 53</ref> It is supposedly in gratitude for this act that Scipio betrothed his youngest daughter ] (then aged about 5) to Gracchus, several decades her senior (however, no contemporaneous references to this event exist; what is known is that Gracchus did marry Cornelia, aged about 18, in 172 BC).
===Death===
Scipio retired to his country seat at ] on the coast of ].<ref name=encarta2008 /> He lived there for the rest of his life, revealing his great magnanimity{{citation needed|date=October 2013}} by attempting to prevent the ruin of the exiled Hannibal by Rome. He died probably in 183 BC (the actual year and date of his death is unknown) aged about 53. His death is said to have taken place under suspicious circumstances, and it is possible that he either died of the lingering effects of the fever contracted while on campaign in 190 BC, or that he took his own life for causes unknown. He is said to have demanded that his body be buried away from his ungrateful city, and the Emperor ] is said to have visited his tomb in Liternum more than 150 years later. However, it is not certain that he was actually buried at Liternum, and no contemporary accounts of his death or funeral exist. It is said that he ordered an inscription on his tomb: ''Ingrata patria, ne ossa quidem habebis'' ("ungrateful fatherland, you will not even have my bones").


The 190s&nbsp;BC saw a re-emergence of attempts by the aristocratic elite to put limits on individual ambitions. The return of the Scipiones to Rome saw claims over Lucius Scipio's triumph disputed: critics thought the Scipiones had been fighting a weak enemy and that the war had actually truly been won a year earlier at Thermopylae. His triumph, however, was approved regardless.{{sfn|Gruen|1995|p=65}} Lucius' attempt to secure from the senate a prorogation to oversee the settlement of Asia also was rejected; no exception would be made to the general post-Hannibalic war rule against promagistrates.{{sfn|Gruen|1995|p=69}} Lucius Scipio adopted the cognomen ''Asiagenes''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Briscoe |first=John |url=http://oxfordre.com/classics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-1868 |title=Cornelius Scipio Asiagenes, Lucius |date=7 March 2016 |work=Oxford Classical Dictionary |publisher=Oxford University Press |doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1868|isbn=978-0-19-938113-5 }}</ref> and at his triumph brought some 137,420 pounds of silver, 224,000 ]s, 140,000 gold coins, 234 gold crowns, 1231 ivory tusks, and more into the city. His soldiers were granted bonuses of 25 denarii each, with more to officers and cavalry.<ref>{{harvnb|Gruen|1995|p=71|ps=. "ew heights of extravagance".}}</ref>
Coincidentally, his great rival ] died in ] in the same year or shortly thereafter, also an exile (albeit far from his native city and not by his own decision), pursued and harassed to the end by Romans such as ].


These enormous amounts of plunder triggered moral panic at Rome about the possible diversion of those funds to extravagant private use.{{sfn|Gruen|1995|p=73}} These troubles related to the broader matter of charting the boundaries of power that magistrates could exercise abroad, especially in relation of monies obtained in war.{{sfn|Gruen|1995|p=87}} A confusing mess of stories related to the Scipiones' legal troubles are recorded in the ancient sources.<ref>{{harvnb|Gruen|1995|p=74|ps=. "No reconstruction can reconcile all the conflicting testimony".}}</ref>
==Marriage and issue==
With his wife ], daughter of the consul ] who fell at Cannae and sister of another consul ], he had a happy and fruitful marriage. Aemilia had unusual freedom and wealth for a patrician married woman, and she was an important role model for many younger Roman women,{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}} just as her youngest daughter Cornelia, mother of the Gracchi, would be an important role model for many Late Republican Roman noblewomen, including allegedly the mother of Julius Caesar.


Scipio Asiagenes was in fact indicted. He was not alone, his successor in Asia – ] – also was brought up on charges. Regardless, the trial forced a full accounting of cash paid by Antiochus to Manlius and Asiagenes. After Asiagenes was fined – either by a special court or by tribunician legislation – he refused to pay the fine, claiming poverty, and was only saved from prison when one of the plebeian tribunes, usually identified as ], interceded.{{sfn|Gruen|1995|pp=75–77, 86}}
Scipio Africanus had two sons. The elder ] was appointed an ] in 180 BC;<ref>Livy, History of Rome 20.24.</ref> he never ran for office due to poor health.<ref>Cicero, Brutus, a History of Famous Orators 77.
</ref> The younger ] became praetor in 174 BC,<ref>Broughton, vol. 1, p. 404.</ref> and was expelled from the Senate by the censors.<ref>Livy, History of Rome 41.27.</ref> The elder son Publius adopted his first cousin, his uncle ]'s second son, who received the name ].


Africanus was around the same time challenged in the senate. A senator demanded that he produce his account-books for the Antiochene campaign and account for the monies allotted to pay his troops. He responded with indignation and declared that he owed no reckoning. Securing the account-books from his brother, he waved them before the senators and then tore them up, asking the rhetorical question as to how the senate could be concerned with a mere 3,000 talents when he had brought 15,000 into the treasury by conquering Spain, Africa, and Asia.<ref>{{harvnb|Gruen|1995|p=79}}, citing, among others, {{harvnb|Polyb.|loc=23.14.8–11}}; {{harvnb|Livy|loc=38.55.10–13}}; {{harvnb|Val. Max.|loc=3.7.1d}}.</ref>
Scipio and Aemilia Paulla also had two surviving daughters. The elder, Cornelia, married her second cousin ] (son of the consul of 191 BC who was himself son of Scipio's elder paternal uncle Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus). This son-in-law was a distinguished Roman in his own right. He became consul (abdicating or resigning in 162 BC for religious reasons, then being re-elected in 155 BC), censor in 159 BC, ], and died as Pontifex Maximus in 141 BC. Scipio Nasica rose to many of the dignities enjoyed by his late father-in-law, and was noted for his staunch (if ultimately futile) opposition to ] over the fate of Carthage from about 157 to 149 BC. They had at least one surviving son (of whom more below).


One story, given by ], indicates that one of the tribunes at the urging of ] brought charges against Scipio Africanus alleging bribery and theft. Antias then has Scipio respond with a rousing oration detailing his services to the republic and noting that the day is the anniversary of the Battle of Zama. At this notice, he then leads an impromptu procession to sacrifice at the ] amid thunderous applause, leaving the prosecutors embarrassed. This story, however, "generates little confidence".{{sfn|Gruen|1995|pp=80–81}}
]]]
The younger daughter was more famous in history; ], the young wife of the elderly ], tribune of the plebs, praetor, then consul 177 (then censor and consul again), became the mother of 12 children, the only surviving sons being the famous ] and ]. All three surviving children of this union were ill-fated; the brothers Gracchi died relatively young, murdered or forced to commit suicide by more conservative relatives. The eldest child and only surviving daughter, ], was married to her mother's first cousin (and her own cousin by adoption) ]. The couple had no children, and Sempronia grew to hate her husband after he condoned the murder of her brother Tiberius in 132 BC. Scipio's mysterious death in 129 BC, at the age of 56, was blamed by some on his wife, and by others on his political rivals.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}}


The legal troubles proved little trouble for the Scipiones, as evidence by Asiagenes' lavish games in 186 and vigorous campaign for the censorship of 184 (he was unsuccessful). Friends of the Scipiones continued to win consular elections. Scipio himself retired to Liternum; "the idea that he retired in semi-exile or ignominy is pure romance".{{sfn|Gruen|1995|p=88}}
Scipio's only descendants living through the late Republican period were the descendants of his two daughters, his sons having died without legitimate surviving issue. His younger daughter's last surviving child ], wife and then widow of ], was alive as late as 102 BC.


===Death===
His other known grandson ] was far more conservative than his Gracchi cousins. He and his descendants all became increasingly conservative, in stark contrast to the father and grandfathers. Scipio Africanus's eldest grandson ] became consul in 138, murdered his own cousin ] (163–132 BC) in 132. Scipio Nasica Serapio, although ] was sent to Asia Minor by the Senate to escape the wrath of the Gracchi supporters, and died mysteriously there in ], and is believed to have been poisoned by an agent of the Gracchi.
]]]


Scipio retired to his country seat at ] on the coast of ], where he died. There are multiple dates reported for his death. ] and ], who both lived shortly after his death, report that he died in 183&nbsp;BC; the later historian ] reported that he died in 187&nbsp;BC. ], arguing against both dates in his history, believed Scipio died {{circa|185&nbsp;BC}}, rejecting both dates with the argument that if Scipio lived to 183 he would be noted as ''princeps senatus'' and that Scipio had to have lived to 185&nbsp;BC to have been prosecuted by the Naevius who was tribune in that year.<ref>{{harvnb|Miles|1995|pp=59–60|ps=, referencing Livy, 39.52.}}</ref> However, most modern sources, such as the '']'', prefer 183&nbsp;BC.{{sfn|Briscoe|2012}}
Serapio's son, the fourth Scipio Nasica, was even more conservative, and rose to be consul in 111 BC. This Scipio Nasica's sons became praetors only shortly before the Marsic or ] (starting 91 BC). However, a grandson (adopted into the plebeian-noble Caecilii Metelli) became the ] who allied himself with ] and ], and who opposed ]. Metellus Scipio was the last Scipio to distinguish himself militarily or politically.


It is not clear where Scipio Africanus was buried. There are three main possibilities. The first is the ] in Rome. Nothing survives in the literary record documenting his burial there, however.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Lushkov |first=A Haimson |title=Narrative and notice in Livy's fourth decade: the case of Scipio Africanus |journal=Classical Antiquity |volume=33 |issue=1 |pages=102–129 |issn=0278-6656 |year=2014 |doi=10.1525/CA.2014.33.1.102 |s2cid=149035118 }} Lushkov notes also, p. 121 n. 53, that {{harvnb|Livy|loc=38.56.4}} merely claims ''it is said'' that statutes of Scipios Africanus and Asiagenes adorn the tomb.</ref> The second is his villa at Liternum: it was later owned by ], who in a letter expressed his belief that an altar there was Africanus' tomb.<ref>Sen. ''Ep.'', 86.1. "I am inclined to think is the tomb of that great warrior".</ref> The third is the pyramidal ] which was ahistorically dubbed the {{lang|la|Sepulcrum Scipionis}} during the Renaissance.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Richardson |first=L |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K_qjo30tjHAC |title=A new topographical dictionary of ancient Rome |date=1992 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |isbn=978-0-8018-4300-6 |page=359 }}</ref>
None of Scipio's descendants, apart from Scipio Aemilianus—his wife's nephew who became his adoptive grandson—came close to matching his political career or his military successes.


==Marriage and issue==
==Descendants==
Scipio married ],{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=98}} daughter of the consul ] who fell at Cannae.{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|pp=22, 21}} She was also the sister of another consul, ].{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=22}} Scipio's marriage was fruitful.
With ] (])
# ] – elder son, adoptive father of ], no natural issue
# ] – younger son, no legitimate surviving issue
# Cornelia – elder daughter, married ]
## ], married Caecilia Metella
### ] – son
#### Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica – son, married Licinia Crassa Prima, daughter of ]
##### ] – elder son, born Publius Cornelius Scipio, adopted by ], married Aemilia Lepida, daughter of ]
###### A son – died young
###### Another son – died around 70
###### Possibly an adopted son
###### ] – only daughter, married first to ] and second to ], no issue
##### Lucius Licinius Crassus Scipio –younger son, adopted by his grandfather ]
#### Cornelia Scipionis – daughter, married Publius Cornelius M. f. Lentulus
##### Gnaeus Cornelius P. f. M. n. Lentulus
# ] – younger daughter, married ]
## ] – elder son of three surviving children, married Claudia, daughter of ]
### 3 sons, died young
## ] – younger son of three surviving children, married Licinia, daughter of ]
### Sempronia – daughter<!--- Unsourced information, possibly inspiring or inspired by Colleen McCullough's "Masters of Rome", married Marcus Fulvius Flaccus Bambalio, son of ]
#### ] – daughter, married to ], ] and ]--->
## ] – only daughter of three surviving children, married ], no issue
## 9 other children, died in childhood


They had three sons:
==Resting place==
* Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio, who became praetor in 177&nbsp;BC;
].]]
* ], who became praetor in 174&nbsp;BC; and
Archaeology has not yet determined the resting place of Scipio Africanus. The ] has been discovered and is open to the public, but it is not believed that Scipio Africanus was interred there. The possibility exists that he was returned to Rome and laid to rest there in a still undiscovered crypt. Livy says in his ''History of Rome'' that statues of Scipio Africanus, Lucius Scipio and the Roman poet ] (a friend of the family) were present at the Tomb of the Scipios when he visited it. However, ] (''Epistle'' 86.1), having moved into the villa at ] that used to belong to Scipio Africanus, says that he has done "reverence to his spirit and to an altar which I am inclined to think is the tomb of that great warrior". This suggests that it was known that Africanus was not buried inside Rome, and it is possible that his sarcophagus did indeed resemble an altar (although there is no direct evidence for this), given that the ], the "founder" of the Scipiones, which can be found in pride of place in the family tomb, is altar-like in style.
* ], who was inducted into the augurate in 180&nbsp;BC.{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=98}}


They also had two daughters. Both were named Cornelia. The elder married ]. The ] married ] and became mother to the ], ] and ].{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=99}}
==Lost sources==
Scipio is said to have written his memoirs in Greek, but those are lost (perhaps destroyed) along with the history written by his elder son and namesake (adoptive father of Scipio Aemilianus) and his Life by ]. As a result, contemporary accounts of his life, particularly his childhood and youth, are virtually non-existent. Even Plutarch's account of Scipio's life, written much later, has been lost. What remains are accounts of his doings in Polybius, Livy's Histories (which say little about his private life), supplemented with the surviving histories of ] and ], and the odd anecdote in Valerius Maximus. Of these, Polybius was the closest to Scipio Africanus in age and in connections, but his narrative may be biased by his friendship with Scipio's close relatives and that the primary source of his information about Africanus came from one of his best friends, ].


None of his sons had legitimate issue. However, his son Publius adopted the son of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus, who became known as ].{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|p=100}} Scipio's only descendants living through the late Republican period were the descendants of his two daughters. His younger daughter's last surviving child ], wife and then widow of ] – his adoptive grandson{{sfn|Zmeskal|2009|pp=101–102}} – was {{cn span|text=alive as late as 102&nbsp;BC. |date=April 2023}}
==Roman opinions of Scipio==
Scipio was a man of great intellect and culture who could speak and read ], wrote his own memoirs in Greek and became also noted for his introduction of the clean shaven face fashion among the Romans according to the example of ]. This man's fashion lasted until the time of emperor ] and then was revived again by ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Barba |title=Barba – NumisWiki, The Collaborative Numismatics Project |publisher=Forumancientcoins.com |access-date=October 19, 2012}}</ref>
He also enjoyed the reputation of being a graceful ], the secret of his sway being his deep self-confidence and radiant sense of fairness.<ref name="Scipio"/>


== Personality and traits ==
To his political opponents, he was often harsh and arrogant, but towards others singularly gracious and sympathetic. His ] lifestyle, and his unconventional way of wearing the Roman toga, raised much opposition among some Senators of Rome, led by ] who felt that Greek influence was destroying Roman culture. Cato, as a loyalist of ], had been sent out as quaestor to Scipio in Sicily circa 204 BC to investigate charges of military indiscipline, corruption, and other offence against Scipio; none of those charges was found true by the tribunes of the plebs accompanying Cato (it may or may not be significant that years later, as ], Cato degraded Scipio's brother ] from the Senate. It is certainly true that some Romans of the day viewed Cato as a representative of the old Romans, and Scipio and his like as Graecophiles).<ref name="Scipio"/>


=== Roman opinions of Scipio ===
He often visited the temple of ] and made offerings there. There was a belief that he was a special favourite of heaven and actually communicated with the gods. It is quite possible that he himself honestly shared this belief. However, the strength of this belief is evident, even a generation later when his adopted grandson, ], was elected to the consulship from the office of tribune. His rise was spectacular and letters survive from soldiers under his command in Hispania show that they believed that he possessed the same abilities as his grandfather. The elder Scipio was a spiritual man as well as a soldier and statesman, and was a priest of ]. The ability which he is supposed to have possessed is called by the old name, "second sight", and he is supposed to have had prescient dreams in which he saw the future. ] describes this belief as it was perceived then, without offering his opinion as to its veracity. Polybius made a case that Scipio's successes resulted from good planning, rational thinking and intelligence, which he said was a higher sign of the gods' favour than prophetic dreams. Polybius suggested that people had only said that Scipio had supernatural powers because they had not appreciated the natural mental gifts which facilitated Scipio's achievements.<ref name="Scipio"/>
Scipio was a man of great intellect and culture who could speak and read ], wrote his own memoirs in Greek and became also noted for his introduction of the clean shaven face fashion among the Romans according to the example of ] instead of wearing the ]. This man's fashion lasted until the time of emperor ] (r. 117–138), then was revived by ] (r. 306–337) and lasted until the reign of emperor ] (r. 602–610) who again introduced the wearing of the beard among Roman emperors.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=Barba |title=Barba – NumisWiki, The Collaborative Numismatics Project |publisher=Forumancientcoins.com |access-date=19 October 2012}}</ref>
He also enjoyed the reputation of being a graceful ], the secret of his sway being his deep self-confidence and radiant sense of fairness.<ref name="Scipio">{{cite book|title=Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon|last=Liddell Hart|first=Basil|year=1992|isbn=1-85367-132-0|pages=2–10, 24, 25, 200–207|publisher=Greenhill Books |orig-year=1926}}</ref>


To his political opponents, he was often harsh and arrogant, but towards others singularly gracious and sympathetic. His ] lifestyle, and his unconventional way of wearing the Roman toga, raised much opposition among some Senators of Rome, led by ] who felt that Greek influence was destroying Roman culture. Cato, as a loyalist of ], had been sent out as quaestor to Scipio in Sicily circa 204 BC to investigate charges of military indiscipline, corruption, and other offence against Scipio; none of those charges was found true by the tribunes of the plebs accompanying Cato (it may or may not be significant that years later, as ], Cato degraded Scipio's brother ] from the Senate. It is certainly true that some Romans of the day viewed Cato as a representative of the old Romans, and Scipio and his like as Graecophiles).<ref name="Scipio" />
==The continence of Scipio==

He often visited the temple of ] and made offerings there. There was a belief that he was a special favourite of heaven and actually communicated with the gods. It is quite possible that he himself honestly shared this belief. However, the strength of this belief is evident, even a generation later when his adopted grandson, ], was elected to the consulship from the office of tribune. His rise was spectacular and letters survive from soldiers under his command in Hispania show that they believed that he possessed the same abilities as his grandfather.<ref name="Scipio" />

The elder Scipio was a spiritual man as well as a soldier and statesman, and was a priest of ]. The ability which he is supposed to have possessed is called by the old name, "second sight", and he is supposed to have had prescient dreams in which he saw the future. ] describes this belief as it was perceived then, without offering his opinion as to its veracity. Polybius made a case that Scipio's successes resulted from good planning, rational thinking and intelligence, which he said was a higher sign of the gods' favour than prophetic dreams. Polybius suggested that people had only said that Scipio had supernatural powers because they had not appreciated the natural mental gifts which facilitated Scipio's achievements.<ref name="Scipio" />

=== The continence of Scipio ===
]]] ]]]
The Roman historian ], writing in the first century AD, alleged that Scipio Africanus had a weakness for beautiful women, and knowing this, some of his soldiers presented him with a beautiful young woman captured in New Carthage. The woman turned out to be the fiancée of an important Iberian chieftain<ref>Allucius (Livy, ''History of Rome'' XXVI.50), cf. Indibilis (Valerius Maximus, ''Memorable Deeds and Sayings'' 4.3.1)</ref> and Scipio chose to act as a general and not an ordinary soldier in restoring her, virtue and ransom intact, to her fiancé.<ref></ref> This episode was frequently depicted by painters of the Renaissance and early modern era as the Continence of Scipio. The Roman historian ], writing in the first century AD, alleged that Scipio Africanus had a weakness for beautiful women, and knowing this, some of his soldiers presented him with a beautiful young woman captured in New Carthage. The woman turned out to be the fiancée of an important Iberian chieftain<ref>Allucius (Livy, ''History of Rome'' XXVI.50), cf. Indibilis (Valerius Maximus, ''Memorable Deeds and Sayings'' 4.3.1)</ref> and Scipio chose to act as a general and not an ordinary soldier in restoring her, virtue and ransom intact, to her fiancé.<ref></ref> This episode was frequently depicted by painters of the Renaissance and early modern era as the Continence of Scipio.


According to Valerius Maximus, Scipio had a relationship from circa 191 BC with one of his own serving girls, which his wife magnanimously overlooked.<ref> Women's Life in Greece & Rome</ref> The affair, if it lasted from circa 191 BC to Scipio's death 183 BC, might have resulted in issue (not mentioned); what is mentioned is that the girl was ] by ] after Scipio's death and married to one of his ]. This account is only found in Valerius Maximus (Memorable Deeds and Sayings 6.7.1–3. L) writing in the 1st century AD, some decades after Livy. Valerius Maximus is hostile to Scipio Africanus in other matters such as his frequent visits to the ], which Maximus saw as "fake religion." According to Valerius Maximus, Scipio had a relationship from {{circa|191&nbsp;BC}} with one of his own serving girls, which his wife magnanimously overlooked.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lefkowitz |first1=Mary |author-link=Mary Lefkowitz |last2=Fant |first2=Maureen |title=Women's Life in Greece and Rome (selections): 53. Womanly virtue |url=https://diotima-doctafemina.org/translations/anthologies/womens-life-in-greece-and-rome-selections/ii-mens-opinions/53-womanly-virtue/ |website=] |date=1992}}</ref> The affair, if it lasted from circa 191 BC to Scipio's death 183 BC, might have resulted in issue (not mentioned); what is mentioned is that the girl was ] by ] after Scipio's death and married to one of his ]. This account is only found in Valerius Maximus (Memorable Deeds and Sayings 6.7.1–3. L) writing in the first century AD, some decades after Livy. Valerius Maximus is hostile to Scipio Africanus in other matters such as his frequent visits to the ], which Maximus saw as "fake religion".

==Lost works==
Scipio is said to have written his memoirs in Greek, but those are lost (perhaps destroyed) along with the history written by his elder son and namesake (adoptive father of Scipio Aemilianus) and his Life by ]. As a result, contemporary accounts of his life, particularly his childhood and youth, are virtually non-existent. Even Plutarch's account of Scipio's life, written much later, has been lost.

What remains are accounts of his doings in Polybius, Livy's Histories (which say little about his private life), supplemented with the surviving histories of ] and ], and the odd anecdote in Valerius Maximus. Of these, Polybius was the closest to Scipio Africanus in age and in connections, but his narrative may be biased by his friendship with Scipio's close relatives and that the primary source of his information about Africanus came from one of his best friends, ].


==Legacy== ==Legacy==
===Military=== ===Military===
] in ], ]]]
Scipio is considered by many to be one of Rome's greatest generals; he never lost a battle. Skillful alike in strategy and in tactics, he had also the faculty of inspiring his soldiers with confidence. ] reports that, as a Roman commissioner to ] following the defeat of ], on meeting the exiled ], Scipio took the opportunity to ask Hannibal's opinion of the "greatest commander," to which Hannibal named ] as the first and ] as the second. Livy continues, "On Scipio's again asking him whom he regarded as the third, Hannibal, without any hesitation, replied, 'Myself.' Scipio smiled and asked, 'What would you say if you had vanquished me?' 'In that case,' replied Hannibal, 'I should say that I surpassed Alexander and Pyrrhus, and all other commanders in the world.' Scipio was delighted with the turn which the speaker had with true Carthaginian adroitness given to his answer, and the unexpected flattery it conveyed, because Hannibal had set him apart from the ordinary run of military captains as an incomparable commander."<ref></ref>
Scipio is considered by many to be one of Rome's greatest generals. Skillful alike in strategy and in tactics, he had also the faculty of inspiring his soldiers with confidence. ] reports that, as a Roman commissioner to ] following the defeat of ], on meeting the exiled ], Scipio took the opportunity to ask Hannibal's opinion of the "greatest commander", to which Hannibal named ] as the first and ] as the second.<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0165:book=35:chapter=14|title=Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 35, chapter 14|website=www.perseus.tufts.edu}}</ref>

Livy continues, "On Scipio's again asking him whom he regarded as the third, Hannibal, without any hesitation, replied, 'Myself.' Scipio smiled and asked, 'What would you say if you had vanquished me?' 'In that case,' replied Hannibal, 'I should say that I surpassed Alexander and Pyrrhus, and all other commanders in the world.' Scipio was delighted with the turn which the speaker had with true Carthaginian adroitness given to his answer, and the unexpected flattery it conveyed, because Hannibal had set him apart from the ordinary run of military captains as an incomparable commander."<ref name="auto"/>


], a descendant of Scipio, commanded legions against ] in Africa until his defeat at the ] in 49 BC. Popular superstition was that only a Scipio could win a battle in Africa, so Julius Caesar assigned a distant relative of Metellus to his staff in order to say that he too had a Scipio fighting for him. {{Citation needed|date=December 2012}} ], a descendant of Scipio, commanded legions against ] in Africa until his defeat at the ] in 49 BC. Popular superstition was that only a Scipio could win a battle in Africa, so Julius Caesar assigned a distant relative of Metellus to his staff in order to say that he too had a Scipio fighting for him.<ref>], Life of Caesar, 52.4–5</ref><ref>], Life of Caesar, 59</ref>


===Political=== ===Political===
Scipio was the first Roman general to expand Roman territories outside Italy and islands around the Italian mainland. He conquered the Carthaginian territory of ] for Rome, although the two Iberian provinces were not fully pacified for a couple of centuries. His defeat of Hannibal at Zama paved the way for Carthage's eventual destruction in 146 BC. His interest in a Graecophile lifestyle had tremendous influence on the Roman elite; more than a century later, even the conservative ] (great-grandson of the elder Cato) espoused Greek philosophy. Scipio did not introduce Greek ideas or art to the Romans, but his ardent support for the Greek way of life coupled with his own charisma had its inevitable impact. Less beneficially, the Scipios may have led the way in the inevitable chasm that grew up between the Roman elite and the Roman masses, in terms of the way the elite was educated and lived and in the amount of wealth they possessed. Scipio was the first Roman general to expand Roman territories outside Italy and islands around the Italian mainland. He conquered the Carthaginian territory of ] for Rome, although the two Iberian provinces were not fully pacified for a couple of centuries. His defeat of Hannibal at Zama paved the way for Carthage's eventual destruction in 146 BC. His interest in a Graecophile lifestyle had tremendous influence on the Roman elite; more than a century later, even the conservative ] (great-grandson of the elder Cato) espoused Greek philosophy.
Scipio did not introduce Greek ideas or art to the Romans, but his ardent support for the Greek way of life coupled with his own charisma had its inevitable impact. Less beneficially, the Scipios may have led the way in the inevitable chasm that grew up between the Roman elite and the Roman masses, in terms of the way the elite was educated and lived and in the amount of wealth they possessed.


Scipio supported land distribution for his veterans in a tradition harking back to the earliest days of the Republic, yet his actions were seen as somewhat radical by conservatives. In being a successful general who demanded lands for his soldiers, Scipio may have led the way for later generals such as ] and ]. Unlike Marius or Caesar, however, he did not seek to use his charisma and reputation to weaken the Republic. The true measure of Scipio's character in this regard can perhaps be seen by his behaviour shortly after returning in triumph from Africa to a grateful Rome. Scipio refused to accept demands for him to become perpetual consul and dictator. For his self-restraint in putting the good of the republic ahead of his own gain, Scipio was praised by Livy for showing uncommon greatness of mind—an example conspicuously not emulated by Marius, ] or Caesar.<ref name="Scipio"/> Scipio supported land distribution for his veterans in a tradition harking back to the earliest days of the Republic, yet his actions were seen as somewhat radical by conservatives. In being a successful general who demanded lands for his soldiers, Scipio may have led the way for later generals such as ] and ]. Unlike Marius or Caesar, however, he did not seek to use his charisma and reputation to weaken the Republic. The true measure of Scipio's character in this regard can perhaps be seen by his behaviour shortly after returning in triumph from Africa to a grateful Rome. Scipio refused to accept demands for him to become perpetual consul and dictator. For his self-restraint in putting the good of the republic ahead of his own gain, Scipio was praised by Livy for showing uncommon greatness of mind—an example conspicuously not emulated by Marius, ] or Caesar.<ref name="Scipio"/>


The relatives of Scipio continued to dominate the republic for a couple of generations. This domination came to an end in the tumults between the ] brothers, who were his grandsons, and their other relatives in the period from 133 to 122 BC. The Gracchi brothers championed land redistribution in order to boost the ranks of potential Roman soldiers, as Roman soldiers needed to own land to be enfranchised for service in the legions and the number of Roman land owners was withering. They were lynched by their relatives who disapproved of their methods and perhaps had economic reasons to fear the land redistribution. After the fall of the Gracchi, the house of Caecilius became more prominent; however, the Scipiones maintained their aristocratic lustre, providing the consular general who unsuccessfully prevented Sulla's second march on Rome and Metellus Scipio whose daughter was the last wife of Pompey the Great, and who took over command in the civil war against Julius Caesar after the death of Pompey. The granddaughter of Gaius Gracchus, Fulvia, was also unusually prominent for a Roman woman in the affairs of the late republic, marrying Publius Clodius, Gaius Curio and Mark Antony in turn. At a later date, some Roman emperors claimed descent from Scipio Africanus. The relatives of Scipio continued to dominate the republic for a couple of generations. This domination came to an end in the tumults between the ] brothers, who were his grandsons, and their other relatives in the period from 133 to 122 BC. The Gracchi brothers championed land redistribution in order to boost the ranks of potential Roman soldiers, as Roman soldiers needed to own land to be enfranchised for service in the legions and the number of Roman land owners was withering. They were lynched by their relatives who disapproved of their methods and perhaps had economic reasons to fear the land redistribution.
After the fall of the Gracchi, the house of Caecilius became more prominent. However, the Scipiones maintained their aristocratic lustre, providing the consular general who unsuccessfully prevented Sulla's second march on Rome and Metellus Scipio whose daughter was the last wife of Pompey the Great, and who took over command in the civil war against Julius Caesar after the death of Pompey. The granddaughter of Gaius Gracchus, Fulvia, was also unusually prominent for a Roman woman in the affairs of the late republic, marrying Publius Clodius, Gaius Curio and Mark Antony in turn. At a later date, some Roman emperors claimed descent from Scipio Africanus.

== Cultural depictions ==


===Classical literature=== ===Classical literature===
Line 207: Line 211:


===Renaissance literature and art=== ===Renaissance literature and art===
] (])]] ] (])]]

Scipio is the hero of ]'s ] ] '']''. 'The Continence of Scipio' was a stock motif in ] and art,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=ng643.2 |title=Giulio Licinio &#124; The Continence of Scipio &#124; NG643.2 &#124; The National Gallery, London |publisher=Nationalgallery.org.uk |access-date=19 October 2012}}</ref> as was the 'Dream of Scipio', portraying his ] choice between Virtue and Luxury.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=ng213 |title=Raphael &#124; An Allegory ('Vision of a Knight') &#124; NG213 &#124; The National Gallery, London |publisher=Nationalgallery.org.uk |access-date=19 October 2012}}</ref> '']'', depicting his clemency and sexual restraint after the fall of Carthago Nova, was an even more popular subject. Versions of the subject were painted by many artists from the Renaissance through to the 19th century, including ] and ].


Scipio is the hero of ]'s ] ] '']''. 'The Continence of Scipio' was a stock motif in ] and art,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=ng643.2 |title=Giulio Licinio &#124; The Continence of Scipio &#124; NG643.2 &#124; The National Gallery, London |publisher=Nationalgallery.org.uk |access-date=October 19, 2012}}</ref> as was the 'Dream of Scipio', portraying his ] choice between Virtue and Luxury.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=ng213 |title=Raphael &#124; An Allegory ('Vision of a Knight') &#124; NG213 &#124; The National Gallery, London |publisher=Nationalgallery.org.uk |access-date=October 19, 2012}}</ref> '']'', depicting his clemency and sexual restraint after the fall of Carthago Nova, was an even more popular subject. Versions of the subject were painted by many artists from the Renaissance through to the 19th century, including ] and ]. Scipio is also mentioned in ]'s work '']'' (Chapter XVII "Concerning Cruelty And Clemency, And Whether It Is Better To Be Loved Than Feared"). ] mentions Scipio in Book 9 of '']'' and in Book 3 of '']''. ]'s painting '']'' is thought to be a depiction of Scipio. Scipio is mentioned in ]'s work '']'' (Chapter XVII "Concerning Cruelty And Clemency, And Whether It Is Better To Be Loved Than Feared"). ] mentions Scipio in Book 9 of '']'' and in Book 3 of '']''. ]'s painting '']'' is thought to be a depiction of Scipio.


===Music=== ===Music===
Line 227: Line 233:
===Video games=== ===Video games===
Scipio features as a playable character, represented by a ], in the ] in '']''. He also appears in the ] video game ''], ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/207904/how-to-get-good-generals-in-centurion-defender-of-rome|title=How to get good generals in Centurion: Defender of Rome?|access-date=8 September 2019}}</ref>'' and in the Hannibal at the Gates campaign in ''].'' Scipio features as a playable character, represented by a ], in the ] in '']''. He also appears in the ] video game ''], ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/207904/how-to-get-good-generals-in-centurion-defender-of-rome|title=How to get good generals in Centurion: Defender of Rome?|access-date=8 September 2019}}</ref>'' and in the Hannibal at the Gates campaign in ''].''
Scipio is also the starting Commander for the Roman civilization in the mobile game Rise of Kingdoms. Scipio appears twice as a playable character in the Mobile/PC Game Rise of Kingdoms.


== Offices ==

The following table is derived from {{harvnb|Broughton|1952|p=555}} unless otherwise indicated.
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|-
!Year (BC)
!Office
!Colleague
!Comment
|-
|216
|Military tribune
|{{plainlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* Gnaeus Octavius
* Lucius Publicius Bibulus
* ]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|pp=250–251}}
}}
|
|-
|213
|Curule aedile
|]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=263}}
|
|-
|216–210
|Proconsul
|
|Spain
|-
|205
|Consul
|]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=301}}
|Assigned Sicily ''extra sortem'', then further assigned Africa{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=301}}
|-
|204–201
|Proconsul
|
|Continuously prorogued in Africa; victor of Zama in 202{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=317}}
|-
|199
|Censor
|]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=327}}
|
|-
|199–189
|Princeps senatus
|
|Chosen ''princeps senatus'' in his own censorship{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=327}}
|-
|194
|Consul
|]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=342}}
|Fought the ] and ]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=343}}
|-
|193
|Legate (ambassador)
|
|Sent to Africa to settle boundary dispute and thence possibly to Asia{{sfn|Broughton|1951|pp=348–349}}
|-
|190
|Legate (lieutenant)
|
|Served under his brother, ]{{sfn|Broughton|1951|p=358}}
|-
|184?
|Legate?
|
|Possibly legate in Etruria<ref>{{harvnb|Broughton|1951|p=377|ps=, citing {{harvnb|Livy|loc=38.56.8–9}}.}}</ref>
|}


==See also== ==See also==
*] * ]
{{clear}} {{clear}}


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist}} {{reflist|20em}}


==References== ==References==


===Primary sources=== ===Modern sources===
{{refbegin|30em}}
* Livy, ''] xxvi, xxviii, xxix''
* {{Cite book |title=Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 BC |series=Cambridge Ancient History |volume=8 |edition=2nd |date=1989 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Oe1u1H_OSMC |editor-last1=Astin |editor-first1=A E |display-editors=etal |isbn=0-521-23448-4 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |oclc=916019669 |ref={{harvid|CAH<sup>2</sup> 8|1989}} }}
* ], ''Historiae adversus paganos libri iv''
** {{harvc |last=Briscoe |first=John |c=The Second Punic War |in=CAH<sup>2</sup> 8 |year=1989 |pages=44–80 }}
* ], ''] libri iii, iv, vii, viii''
** {{harvc |last=Errington |first=R M |c=Rome against Philip and Antiochus |in=CAH<sup>2</sup> 8 |year=1989 |pages=244–289 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Briscoe |first=John |url=http://oxfordre.com/classics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-1867 |chapter=Cornelius Scipio Africanus, Publius, 'the elder' |title=Oxford Classical Dictionary |edition=4th |date=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1867|isbn=978-0-19-938113-5 }}
* {{cite book |last=Broughton |first=Thomas Robert Shannon |year=1951 |title=The magistrates of the Roman republic |location=New York |publisher=American Philological Association |author-link=Thomas Robert Shannon Broughton |volume=1}}
* {{cite book |last=Broughton |first=Thomas Robert Shannon |year=1952 |title=The magistrates of the Roman republic |location=New York |publisher=American Philological Association |author-link=Thomas Robert Shannon Broughton |volume=2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Drogula |first=Fred |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XJ6_BwAAQBAJ |title=Commanders & command in the Roman republic and early empire |year=2015 |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |isbn=978-1-4696-2314-6 |location=Chapel Hill |oclc=905949529 }}
* {{cite book |last=Etcheto |year=2012 |first=Henri |title=Les Scipions: famille et pouvoir à Rome à l'époque républicaine |language=fr |publisher=Ausonius Éditions |place=Bordeaux |isbn=978-2-35613-073-0 |url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01984245/document }}
* {{Cite book |last=Goldsworthy |first=Adrian |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-hd8CwAAQBAJ |title=In the name of Rome: the men who won the Roman empire |date=2003 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-22183-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Gruen |first=Erich |chapter=The "fall" of the Scipios |date=1995 |url=https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004329447/BP000006.xml |title=Leaders and masses in the Roman world |pages=59–90 |editor-last=Malkin |editor-first=I |editor-last2=Rubinsohn |editor-first2=Z W |publisher=Brill |series=Mnemosyne Supplements |volume=139 |doi=10.1163/9789004329447_006 |isbn=978-9-0040-9917-3 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Miles |first=Gary B |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TlhuDwAAQBAJ |title=Livy: reconstructing early Rome |date=1995 |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=978-1-5017-2461-9 }}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Scullard |first=H H |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KeM8AAAAIAAJ |degree=PhD |institution=Cambridge University |title=Scipio Africanus in the Second Punic War |date=1929 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Scullard |first=H H |title=Scipio Africanus: soldier and politician |date=1970 |publisher=Thames & Hudson |isbn=0-500-40012-1 |location=London |oclc=80462}}
* {{cite book |last=Zmeskal |first=Klaus |title=Adfinitas |volume=1 |year=2009 |location=Passau |publisher=Verlag Karl Stutz |isbn=978-3-88849-304-1 |language=de }}
{{refend}}


===Secondary sources=== === Primary sources ===
{{refbegin|30em}}
*], ''The Magistrates of the Roman Republic'' (American Philological Association, 1951, 1986).
* {{Cite wikisource |author=Livy |author-link=Livy |title=From the Founding of the City |translator-last=Roberts |translator-first=Canon |year=1905 |wslink=From the Founding of the City |orig-date=1st century AD |wslanguage=en |ref={{harvid|Livy}} }}
*], ''Hannibal'', Da Capo Press; Reissue edition, 2004. {{ISBN|0-306-81362-9}}
* {{cite book |author=Polybius |title=Histories |url=http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/home.html |year=1922–1927 |orig-year=2nd century BC |series=Loeb Classical Library |publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge |translator-last=Paton |translator-first=W R |via=LacusCurtius |ref={{harvid|Polyb.}} }}
* {{cite book |last=Etcheto |year=2012 |first=Henri |title=Les Scipions: Famille et pouvoir à Rome à l'époque républicaine |lang=fr |publisher=Ausonius Éditions |place=Bordeaux |isbn=978-2-35613-073-0 |url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01984245/document }}
* {{Cite book |author=Valerius Maximus |author-link=Valerius Maximus |title=Memorable deeds and sayings: one thousand tales from ancient Rome |year=2004 |translator-last=Walker |translator-first=Henry |isbn=0-87220-675-0 |location=Indianapolis |oclc=53231884 |publisher=Hackett |ref={{harvid|Val. Max.}} }}
* ], ''Scipio Africanus: Soldier and Politician'', Thames and Hudson, London, 1970. {{ISBN|0-500-40012-1}}
{{refend}}
* ], ''Scipio Africanus in the Second Punic War'' Thirlwall Prize Essay (University Press, Cambridge, 1930)

*{{EB1911|wstitle=Scipio|display=Scipio § ''Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus''|volume=24|pages=405–406}}
== Further reading ==
* ], ''Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon'', W Blackwood and Sons, London, 1926; Biblio and Tannen, New York, 1976. {{ISBN|0-306-80583-9}}.
{{refbegin|30em}}
* E. Torregaray Pagola, ''La elaboración de la tradición sobre los Cornelii Scipiones: pasado histórico y conformación simbólica'', Fundación Fernando el Católico, Zaragoza, 1998. ISBN 9788478204458.
* {{EB1911|wstitle=Scipio|display=Scipio § ''Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus''|volume=24|pages=405–406 |noprescript=1}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Jacobs |first=John |date=28 June 2023 |title=Review of: L'area archeologica del Sepolcro degli Scipioni a Roma: analisi delle strutture di eta imperiale e tardo antica |url=https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2023/2023.06.36/ |journal=Bryn Mawr Classical Review |issn=1055-7660}}
* {{cite book |author=Orosius |author-link=Orosius |title=History against the pagans |ref={{harvid|Oros.}} }}
{{refend}}


==External links== ==External links==
* {{commons category inline|Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus Major}} * {{commons category-inline|Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus Major}}
* {{wikiquote-inline}} * {{wikiquote-inline}}
* {{wikisource author-inline}} * {{wikisource author-inline}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.akinde.dk/history/index.php?title=Publius_Cornelius_Scipio_Africanus|title=Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus|access-date= 28 February 2009|last=Akinde|first=Michael|year=2006|publisher=Michael Akinde}}
* {{cite web|first=John |last=Sloan|url=http://www.xenophon-mil.org/milhist/rome/scipio.htm|title= Scipio Africanus, Publius Cornelius, (The Elder) (237–183 BC), son of Publius Cornelius Scipio|access-date=28 February 2009|publisher=Xenophon Group International}}


{{s-start}} {{s-start}}
Line 276: Line 369:
{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Scipio Africanus}}
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 21:03, 3 January 2025

Roman general and politician (236/235 – c. 183 BC) For other uses, see Scipio Africanus (disambiguation) and Publius Cornelius Scipio.

Scipio Africanus
White bust without noseBust likely of Scipio Africanus (formerly identified as Sulla), originally found near his family tomb
Born236 or 235 BC
Rome, Roman Republic
Diedc. 183 BC
Liternum, Roman Republic
NationalityRoman
Known forDefeating Hannibal
Office
  • Proconsul (Spain, 216–210 BC)
  • Consul (205 BC)
  • Proconsul (Africa, 204–201 BC)
  • Censor (199 BC)
  • Consul (194 BC)
  • Legate (Asia, 190 BC)
SpouseAemilia Tertia
Children4, including Cornelia
FatherPublius Scipio
RelativesScipio Asiaticus (brother)
Scipio Aemilianus (adoptive grandson)
Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus (grandsons)
Military service
AllegianceRome
Branch/serviceRoman army
Battles/wars

Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus (/ˈskɪp.i.oʊ/, /ˈsɪp-/, Latin: [ˈskiːpioː]; 236/235–c. 183 BC) was a Roman general and statesman, who was one of the main architects of Rome's victory against Carthage in the Second Punic War. Often regarded as one of the greatest military commanders and strategists of all time, his greatest military achievement was the defeat of Hannibal at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC. This victory in Africa earned him the honorific epithet Africanus, literally meaning 'the African', but meant to be understood as a conqueror of Africa.

Scipio's conquest of Carthaginian Iberia culminated in the Battle of Ilipa in 206 BC against Hannibal's brother Mago Barca. Although considered a hero by the Roman people, primarily for his victories against Carthage, Scipio had many opponents, especially Cato the Elder, who hated him deeply. In 187 BC, he was tried in a show trial alongside his brother for bribes they supposedly received from the Seleucid king Antiochus III during the Roman–Seleucid War. Disillusioned by the ingratitude of his peers, Scipio left Rome and retired from public life at his villa in Liternum.

Early years

Family

Scipio Africanus was born as Publius Cornelius Scipio in 236 BC to his then-homonymous father and Pomponia into the family of the Cornelii Scipiones. His family was one of the major still-extant patrician families and had held multiple consulships within living memory: his great-grandfather Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus and grandfather Lucius Cornelius Scipio had both been consuls and censors. His father had held the consulship of 218 BC, his uncle was consul in 222 BC, and his mother's brothers – Manius Pomponius Matho and Marcus Pomponius Matho – were both consuls in 233 and 231, respectively.

Early military service

The Second Punic war started in early 218 BC when the Roman ultimatum to Carthage demanding that Hannibal withdraw from Saguntum in Spain was rejected. Scipio's father was consul that year and the younger Scipio joined him in the campaign to stop Hannibal's march on Italy. In a short cavalry engagement between Scipio's father and Hannibal at the river Ticinus near modern Pavia, Polybius claims that the son saved his father's life after the father was encircled by enemy horsemen. Other sources credit an unnamed Ligurian slave.

Two years later, in 216 BC, Scipio served as military tribune. He survived the disastrous Battle of Cannae – his father-in-law, the consul Lucius Aemilius Paullus, was there slain – and, after the battle, rallied survivors at Canusium. According to Livy, when he heard that Lucius Caecilius Metellus and other young nobles were discussing a plan to abandon the republic and go overseas to serve as mercenaries, Scipio stormed into the meeting and forced all of them at sword-point to swear to Jupiter and the Capitoline triad that they would never abandon Rome. This story is probably a late invention, as it does not appear in Polybius.

The next year, in 213 BC, he was elected curule aedile and served with his cousin Marcus Cornelius Cethegus. His candidacy was opposed by one of the plebeian tribunes on the grounds that he had not yet reached the minimum age, but the voters expressed such enthusiastic support for Scipio that the tribune desisted.

Second Punic War

Campaign in Hispania

Roman campaigning from 210–206 BC in Hispania
A Carthaginian coin depicting Hasdrubal Barca (245–207 BC), one of Hannibal's younger brothers, wearing a diadem

From the start of the war through to 211 BC, Scipio's father, Publius Cornelius Scipio, and uncle – Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus – were in command of Rome's armies in Spain. They made some headway when the Carthaginians were forced to withdraw a considerable portion of their forces to handle a revolt by Syphax of Numidia. Through the seven years from 218, the brothers had successfully extended Roman control deep into Carthaginian territory. However, disaster struck in 211 BC when the brothers divided their forces to attack three separate Carthaginian armies were defeated in detail. The brothers fell in separate battles against the Carthaginians, who were led by Hasdrubal Barca, Mago Barca, and Hasdrubal Gisco; the two Barcas were Hannibal's brothers.

Initially, Gaius Claudius Nero – who was praetor in 212 BC – was sent to contain the situation. But in 210 BC, the assembly elected Scipio to take command. Modern scholars dismiss the Livian narrative of senatorial indecision and have instead suggested that the senate chose Scipio but forced a popular vote to legitimise an irregular command. Giving Scipio command was an extraordinary act, as he at this point had never held a praetorship or consulship, but was regardless granted imperium pro consule, taking command on his arrival to Spain in the early autumn. He was the first person to have been given proconsular imperium without having held consular office. He went to Spain with some 10,000 reinforcements and was joined by another commander, Marcus Junius Silanus, who was dispatched pro praetore and soon assumed command of Nero's army.

Seeking to defeat the three Carthaginian armies in detail, the next year, 209 BC, saw Scipio's first major campaign: he besieged Carthago Nova (modern Cartagena), which was a major Carthaginian logistics hub and of substantial strategic importance. In the battle, he captured the city by sending a wading party across the lagoon to the city's north when it reached low tide, he told the troops that he had a vision in which the god Neptune had promised aid; this alleged vision played a role in the rapid development of a Scipionic legend around him and his family. Storming the city rapidly and with little ability to tell combatants and civilians apart, Scipio ordered his men to massacre all they encountered and pillage any structures; Polybius viewed the massacre as intended to terrorise the Spanish population into rapidly surrendering and included an anecdote of Romans being so thorough as to cut even the dogs and other animals in half. He then forced the surrender of Mago in the citadel and rapidly switched his tune, sparing the remaining citizens and only enslaving the town's non-citizens. He then took the three hundred Spanish hostages into his custody, giving them gifts, guaranteeing their safety and that of their families, and promising them freedom if their respective communities would ally with Rome.

After the battle, several Spanish tribes defected to the Romans. The next year, 208 BC, Scipio fought Hasdrubal north of the river Baetis, near Baecula. While Scipio was victorious, the battle was indecisive and Hasdrubal escaped north with most of his army across the Pyrenees for Italy; Hasdrubal and his army reached Italy in 207, where they were eventually defeated in the Battle of the Metaurus with the army destroyed and Hasdrubal slain. The following year, Hasdrubal was replaced by a certain Hanno, who was captured by Junius Silanus in Celtiberia. Following the army under Hasdrubal, son of Gisgo, which retreated to Gades (modern Cádiz), Scipio's brother took Orongis (modern Jaén) before a decisive victory in 206 BC at the Battle of Ilipa, north of modern Seville, forced the Carthaginians to withdraw from the peninsula. In mopping-up operations, Scipio captured Ilourgeia and Castulo, inflicting severe punishment on the former for having killed refugees from his army. Other Roman commanders captured other towns in Spain, including Astapa, whose inhabitants committed mass suicide. After a quickly-suppressed revolt by Spanish tribes when false rumours of Scipio's death from illness spread, he crossed into Africa to solicit the support of Syphax and thence into western Hispania to meet Massinissa for the same purpose. Syphax pledged loyalty but eventually joined with the Carthaginians; Massinissa, however, joined with the Romans with a small contingent when Syphax expelled him the kingdom of Massylii. Meanwhile, Gades surrendered to the Romans.

Some time c. 206 BC, Scipio also founded the town of Italica (located about 9 km northwest of Seville), which later became the birthplace of the emperors, Trajan, Hadrian, and Theodosius I.

With a general victory across the peninsula, Scipio then returned to Rome to stand for the consulship of 205 BC, leaving Lucius Cornelius Lentulus and Lucius Manlius Acidinus in command. He returned to Rome late in the year; according to Livy he was denied a triumph, on the grounds that he was privatus – that is, sine magistratu – and had never been elected to a magistracy with imperium.

African campaign

A Carthaginian coin possibly depicting Hannibal as Hercules (i.e. Heracles)

Scipio was elected unanimously to the consulship of 205 BC amid much enthusiasm; he was 31 and still technically too young to be consul. When he entered into office, he demanded that the senate assign him the province of Africa and threatened to take the matter to the popular assemblies if it refused to do so. Despite fierce opposition from the princeps senatus, Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, the senate bowed to his pressure and he received Sicily with permission to cross into Africa if he wished. Fabius' opposition may have been related to jealousy of Scipio's popularity, but also was likely informed by the failed African campaign c. 255 BC under Marcus Atilius Regulus during the First Punic War, which saw the Carthaginians' war efforts renewed. The senate, regardless, assigned Scipio no additional soldiers, leading him to recruit an army of volunteers; Livy reports that from his clients and supporters in Italy, he mustered some 30 warships and 7,000 men.

He spent most of his consulship preparing his troops in Sicily for the invasion of Africa. He captured Locri on the toe of Italy that year, and left one Pleminius in command there. After Pleminius assumed command, he robbed the city's temple and tortured and killed two military tribunes. For these crimes, the senate had Pleminius placed under arrest; Scipio was also implicated but was cleared the next year.

Invasion of Africa

His imperium was prorogued into 205 BC and in that year, he crossed with his men into Africa and besieged Utica before withdrawing and pretending in the winter to negotiate with the Carthaginians. During those pretended negotiations, Scipio mapped out the enemy camps and launched a night attack that was successful in destroying them and killing a large number of the enemy. The armies then fought in the Battle of the Great Plains some time early in the new year (his imperium was prorogued until the war's completion) and after capturing Syphax of Numidia, restored Massinissa to the kingdom. The Carthaginians reacted to the defeat by recalling their generals Hannibal and Mago from Italy and launching their fleet against Scipio's to cut off their supply lines. Scipio was forced into a naval battle near Utica, but was able to avert disaster, losing only some sixty transport ships. Another set of peace negotiations occurred, with the Carthaginians eventually agreeing to abandon all territorial claims in the Mediterranean and beyond, limit her rights to expand in Africa, recognize Massinissa's kingdom, give up all but twenty of her ships, and pay a war indemnity. However, during the negotiations, the Carthaginians – suffering from starvation – attacked a Roman food convoy, leading to protests to be sent and envoys exchanged.

Amid further attempts to remove him from command – one of the consuls of 203 BC, Gnaeus Servilius Caepio, attempted to substitute himself for Scipio to claim credit for the final blow against Carthage; the consuls of 202 BC coveted the African command for the same reason – Scipio refused peace terms at a parley with Hannibal in 202 BC. With the support of Masinissa's Numidian cavalry, the Battle of Zama was fought shortly after; the Romans won and Carthage then again sued for peace.

In the new year, 201 BC, Scipio remained in Africa to conclude negotiations, which saw Carthage's territory kept to the status quo ante bellum, Carthage restore to the Romans all captured goods and persons, Carthaginian disarmament of all but ten triremes, and Carthage needing to ask for Roman permission to make any war. Massinissa's territory in Numidia was to be confirmed; and a war indemnity of 10,000 talents was to be paid over the next fifty years. Although the consul of 201 BC, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus attempted to oppose the peace so that he could continue the war in Scipio's place, the peace terms were ratified by the assembly in Rome, bringing the war to a final close.

Return

On his return, Scipio celebrated a triumph over Hannibal, the Carthaginians, and Syphax. There, he took the agnomen Africanus ('the African'), for his victories. By this point, Scipio's career reached far beyond his peers even though he was only in his early thirties. On his return, he deposited some 123,000 pounds of silver into the Roman treasury and distributed 400 asses each to his soldiers.

His popularity among the plebs was also astonishing – the Scipionic legend, which in later forms depicted him a son of Jupiter – and heralded great political success. This success, however, turned many Roman aristocrats into his enemies, largely to oppose his further aggrandisement or out of jealousy. Even during his consulship, he had been opposed by Fabius Maximus and others, especially after stories circulated of his being saluted as king and god in Spain. His intended role in Roman politics, however, remained traditional.

Later life

Bronze bust dated mid-first century BC, formerly identified as Scipio Africanus, now thought to portray a priest of Isis

Censorship and second consulship

In the year 199 BC, Scipio was elected censor with Publius Aelius Paetus as his colleague. Their censorship was largely unremarkable, but saw Scipio named as princeps senatus, a title which he retained for the next two lustra. After this point, the classicist Howard Hayes Scullard believed that Scipio's political position entered an eclipse. This is disputed.

After the required ten years between consulships had elapsed, Scipio secured election to the consulship of 194 BC. During his second consulship, he wanted to succeed Titus Quinctius Flamininus in Greece and advocated for a stronger Roman presence in the Aegean to guard against Antiochus III, but was unsuccessful. He instead fought the Boii and Ligurians in northern Italy, against whom the Romans had been continuously campaigning since 201 BC. Scipio let his co-consul, Tiberius Sempronius Longus, take the leading role in the fighting and returned to Rome to hold the consular elections.

In 193 BC, Scipio is said to have taken part in two embassies. The first was to Africa, where he was one of three sent to arbitrate a boundary dispute between Carthage and Masinissa: the commission left the matter undecided, possibly on purpose. The second embassy is said to have been to Asia and, on the basis of travel time, could not have happened. During the alleged embassy, Scipio is apocryphally said to have discussed the best generals with Hannibal at Ephesus.

War with Antiochus

Antiochus sends his son to Scipio. Painting by Jean-Pierre Granger (c. 1800).

In 192 BC, Rome declared war on Antiochus, who – after a cold war with the Romans starting from the close of the Second Macedonian War through to 193 BC – had invaded Greece. Antiochus' initial push into Greece was met with little enthusiasm by the locals, who were well-treated in a peaceful and largely open interstate system in the aftermath of the Roman proclamation of Greek freedom. It did not help that the cities that he did take had to be taken by force. The consul of 191 BC, Manius Acilius Glabrio, arrived in the spring and promptly defeated Antiochus at the Battle of Thermopylae – Antiochus lost the battle and was forced back across the Aegean to Ephesus within six months of the war's start.

The consul of 190 BC was Scipio Africanus' brother, Lucius Cornelius Scipio, who was assigned by the senate to Greece with permission to cross into Asia. He appointed his older brother, Scipio Africanus, as one of his legates. While en route, Roman armies and fleets quickly overwhelmed Antiochus' defences, forcing him to retreat from the Hellespont and Abydos; by October 190 BC, when the Scipios arrived, the Romans had an army in Asia minor. Antiochus offered terms – a war indemnity to cover half the cost of the war and abandonment of his claims to Smyrna, Lapsacus, Alexandria Troas, and other towns – but the Scipiones rejected the offer based on the Roman war aim of reshaping to their benefit the Aegean balance of power. They responded by demanding Antiochus cede all territory to the Taurus mountains and pay an indemnity covering the entire cost of the war; the demands were so extreme he immediately broke off negotiations. Late in the year, around mid-December, Antiochus' forces engaged the Romans at Magnesia; even though they outnumbered the Romans and allies by at least two to one, Antiochus' army of some 60,000 men was routed.

Shortly before Magnesia, Antiochus offered Scipio Africanus a bribe to secure favourable peace terms, which Africanus rejected. At the battle itself, he claimed illness, but was selected to present the Roman peace terms regardless. The credit for the victory accrued to his brother and commander, Lucius. The peace terms presented at Sardis were largely the Roman demands prior to the battle: Antiochus would cede all territory outside the Taurus line (eventually determined to be from Cape Sarpedon in Cilicia through to the river Tanais), pay a war indemnity of 15,000 talents to Rome with a separate 400 talents to Eumenes, all exiles and enemies of Rome would be handed over (including Hannibal) along with twenty hostages (including Antiochus' youngest son).

Trials of the Scipios

The 190s BC saw a re-emergence of attempts by the aristocratic elite to put limits on individual ambitions. The return of the Scipiones to Rome saw claims over Lucius Scipio's triumph disputed: critics thought the Scipiones had been fighting a weak enemy and that the war had actually truly been won a year earlier at Thermopylae. His triumph, however, was approved regardless. Lucius' attempt to secure from the senate a prorogation to oversee the settlement of Asia also was rejected; no exception would be made to the general post-Hannibalic war rule against promagistrates. Lucius Scipio adopted the cognomen Asiagenes and at his triumph brought some 137,420 pounds of silver, 224,000 tetradrachms, 140,000 gold coins, 234 gold crowns, 1231 ivory tusks, and more into the city. His soldiers were granted bonuses of 25 denarii each, with more to officers and cavalry.

These enormous amounts of plunder triggered moral panic at Rome about the possible diversion of those funds to extravagant private use. These troubles related to the broader matter of charting the boundaries of power that magistrates could exercise abroad, especially in relation of monies obtained in war. A confusing mess of stories related to the Scipiones' legal troubles are recorded in the ancient sources.

Scipio Asiagenes was in fact indicted. He was not alone, his successor in Asia – Gnaeus Manlius Vulso – also was brought up on charges. Regardless, the trial forced a full accounting of cash paid by Antiochus to Manlius and Asiagenes. After Asiagenes was fined – either by a special court or by tribunician legislation – he refused to pay the fine, claiming poverty, and was only saved from prison when one of the plebeian tribunes, usually identified as Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, interceded.

Africanus was around the same time challenged in the senate. A senator demanded that he produce his account-books for the Antiochene campaign and account for the monies allotted to pay his troops. He responded with indignation and declared that he owed no reckoning. Securing the account-books from his brother, he waved them before the senators and then tore them up, asking the rhetorical question as to how the senate could be concerned with a mere 3,000 talents when he had brought 15,000 into the treasury by conquering Spain, Africa, and Asia.

One story, given by Valerius Antias, indicates that one of the tribunes at the urging of Cato the Elder brought charges against Scipio Africanus alleging bribery and theft. Antias then has Scipio respond with a rousing oration detailing his services to the republic and noting that the day is the anniversary of the Battle of Zama. At this notice, he then leads an impromptu procession to sacrifice at the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus amid thunderous applause, leaving the prosecutors embarrassed. This story, however, "generates little confidence".

The legal troubles proved little trouble for the Scipiones, as evidence by Asiagenes' lavish games in 186 and vigorous campaign for the censorship of 184 (he was unsuccessful). Friends of the Scipiones continued to win consular elections. Scipio himself retired to Liternum; "the idea that he retired in semi-exile or ignominy is pure romance".

Death

The entrance to the Tomb of Scipios

Scipio retired to his country seat at Liternum on the coast of Campania, where he died. There are multiple dates reported for his death. Polybius and Rutilius, who both lived shortly after his death, report that he died in 183 BC; the later historian Valerius Antias reported that he died in 187 BC. Livy, arguing against both dates in his history, believed Scipio died c. 185 BC, rejecting both dates with the argument that if Scipio lived to 183 he would be noted as princeps senatus and that Scipio had to have lived to 185 BC to have been prosecuted by the Naevius who was tribune in that year. However, most modern sources, such as the Oxford Classical Dictionary, prefer 183 BC.

It is not clear where Scipio Africanus was buried. There are three main possibilities. The first is the Tomb of the Scipios in Rome. Nothing survives in the literary record documenting his burial there, however. The second is his villa at Liternum: it was later owned by Seneca the Younger, who in a letter expressed his belief that an altar there was Africanus' tomb. The third is the pyramidal Meta Romuli which was ahistorically dubbed the Sepulcrum Scipionis during the Renaissance.

Marriage and issue

Scipio married Aemilia Tertia, daughter of the consul Lucius Aemilius Paullus who fell at Cannae. She was also the sister of another consul, Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus. Scipio's marriage was fruitful.

They had three sons:

They also had two daughters. Both were named Cornelia. The elder married Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum. The younger Cornelia married Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus and became mother to the Gracchi brothers, Tiberius Gracchus and Gaius Gracchus.

None of his sons had legitimate issue. However, his son Publius adopted the son of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus, who became known as Scipio Aemilianus. Scipio's only descendants living through the late Republican period were the descendants of his two daughters. His younger daughter's last surviving child Sempronia, wife and then widow of Scipio Aemilianus – his adoptive grandson – was alive as late as 102 BC.

Personality and traits

Roman opinions of Scipio

Scipio was a man of great intellect and culture who could speak and read Greek, wrote his own memoirs in Greek and became also noted for his introduction of the clean shaven face fashion among the Romans according to the example of Alexander the Great instead of wearing the beard. This man's fashion lasted until the time of emperor Hadrian (r. 117–138), then was revived by Constantine the Great (r. 306–337) and lasted until the reign of emperor Phocas (r. 602–610) who again introduced the wearing of the beard among Roman emperors. He also enjoyed the reputation of being a graceful orator, the secret of his sway being his deep self-confidence and radiant sense of fairness.

To his political opponents, he was often harsh and arrogant, but towards others singularly gracious and sympathetic. His Graecophile lifestyle, and his unconventional way of wearing the Roman toga, raised much opposition among some Senators of Rome, led by Cato the Elder who felt that Greek influence was destroying Roman culture. Cato, as a loyalist of Fabius Maximus, had been sent out as quaestor to Scipio in Sicily circa 204 BC to investigate charges of military indiscipline, corruption, and other offence against Scipio; none of those charges was found true by the tribunes of the plebs accompanying Cato (it may or may not be significant that years later, as censor, Cato degraded Scipio's brother Scipio Asiaticus from the Senate. It is certainly true that some Romans of the day viewed Cato as a representative of the old Romans, and Scipio and his like as Graecophiles).

He often visited the temple of Jupiter and made offerings there. There was a belief that he was a special favourite of heaven and actually communicated with the gods. It is quite possible that he himself honestly shared this belief. However, the strength of this belief is evident, even a generation later when his adopted grandson, Publius Aemilianus Scipio, was elected to the consulship from the office of tribune. His rise was spectacular and letters survive from soldiers under his command in Hispania show that they believed that he possessed the same abilities as his grandfather.

The elder Scipio was a spiritual man as well as a soldier and statesman, and was a priest of Mars. The ability which he is supposed to have possessed is called by the old name, "second sight", and he is supposed to have had prescient dreams in which he saw the future. Livy describes this belief as it was perceived then, without offering his opinion as to its veracity. Polybius made a case that Scipio's successes resulted from good planning, rational thinking and intelligence, which he said was a higher sign of the gods' favour than prophetic dreams. Polybius suggested that people had only said that Scipio had supernatural powers because they had not appreciated the natural mental gifts which facilitated Scipio's achievements.

The continence of Scipio

Continence of Scipio, Nicolas-Guy Brenet

The Roman historian Valerius Maximus, writing in the first century AD, alleged that Scipio Africanus had a weakness for beautiful women, and knowing this, some of his soldiers presented him with a beautiful young woman captured in New Carthage. The woman turned out to be the fiancée of an important Iberian chieftain and Scipio chose to act as a general and not an ordinary soldier in restoring her, virtue and ransom intact, to her fiancé. This episode was frequently depicted by painters of the Renaissance and early modern era as the Continence of Scipio.

According to Valerius Maximus, Scipio had a relationship from c. 191 BC with one of his own serving girls, which his wife magnanimously overlooked. The affair, if it lasted from circa 191 BC to Scipio's death 183 BC, might have resulted in issue (not mentioned); what is mentioned is that the girl was freed by Aemilia Paulla after Scipio's death and married to one of his freedmen. This account is only found in Valerius Maximus (Memorable Deeds and Sayings 6.7.1–3. L) writing in the first century AD, some decades after Livy. Valerius Maximus is hostile to Scipio Africanus in other matters such as his frequent visits to the Temple of Jupiter Capitolinus, which Maximus saw as "fake religion".

Lost works

Scipio is said to have written his memoirs in Greek, but those are lost (perhaps destroyed) along with the history written by his elder son and namesake (adoptive father of Scipio Aemilianus) and his Life by Plutarch. As a result, contemporary accounts of his life, particularly his childhood and youth, are virtually non-existent. Even Plutarch's account of Scipio's life, written much later, has been lost.

What remains are accounts of his doings in Polybius, Livy's Histories (which say little about his private life), supplemented with the surviving histories of Appian and Cassius Dio, and the odd anecdote in Valerius Maximus. Of these, Polybius was the closest to Scipio Africanus in age and in connections, but his narrative may be biased by his friendship with Scipio's close relatives and that the primary source of his information about Africanus came from one of his best friends, Gaius Laelius.

Legacy

Military

18th century bust formerly identified as Scipio at Cameron Gallery in Tsarskoye Selo, Russia

Scipio is considered by many to be one of Rome's greatest generals. Skillful alike in strategy and in tactics, he had also the faculty of inspiring his soldiers with confidence. Livy reports that, as a Roman commissioner to Ephesus following the defeat of Antiochus III, on meeting the exiled Hannibal, Scipio took the opportunity to ask Hannibal's opinion of the "greatest commander", to which Hannibal named Alexander the Great as the first and Pyrrhus as the second.

Livy continues, "On Scipio's again asking him whom he regarded as the third, Hannibal, without any hesitation, replied, 'Myself.' Scipio smiled and asked, 'What would you say if you had vanquished me?' 'In that case,' replied Hannibal, 'I should say that I surpassed Alexander and Pyrrhus, and all other commanders in the world.' Scipio was delighted with the turn which the speaker had with true Carthaginian adroitness given to his answer, and the unexpected flattery it conveyed, because Hannibal had set him apart from the ordinary run of military captains as an incomparable commander."

Metellus Scipio, a descendant of Scipio, commanded legions against Julius Caesar in Africa until his defeat at the Battle of Thapsus in 49 BC. Popular superstition was that only a Scipio could win a battle in Africa, so Julius Caesar assigned a distant relative of Metellus to his staff in order to say that he too had a Scipio fighting for him.

Political

Scipio was the first Roman general to expand Roman territories outside Italy and islands around the Italian mainland. He conquered the Carthaginian territory of Iberia for Rome, although the two Iberian provinces were not fully pacified for a couple of centuries. His defeat of Hannibal at Zama paved the way for Carthage's eventual destruction in 146 BC. His interest in a Graecophile lifestyle had tremendous influence on the Roman elite; more than a century later, even the conservative Cato Uticensis (great-grandson of the elder Cato) espoused Greek philosophy.

Scipio did not introduce Greek ideas or art to the Romans, but his ardent support for the Greek way of life coupled with his own charisma had its inevitable impact. Less beneficially, the Scipios may have led the way in the inevitable chasm that grew up between the Roman elite and the Roman masses, in terms of the way the elite was educated and lived and in the amount of wealth they possessed.

Scipio supported land distribution for his veterans in a tradition harking back to the earliest days of the Republic, yet his actions were seen as somewhat radical by conservatives. In being a successful general who demanded lands for his soldiers, Scipio may have led the way for later generals such as Gaius Marius and Julius Caesar. Unlike Marius or Caesar, however, he did not seek to use his charisma and reputation to weaken the Republic. The true measure of Scipio's character in this regard can perhaps be seen by his behaviour shortly after returning in triumph from Africa to a grateful Rome. Scipio refused to accept demands for him to become perpetual consul and dictator. For his self-restraint in putting the good of the republic ahead of his own gain, Scipio was praised by Livy for showing uncommon greatness of mind—an example conspicuously not emulated by Marius, Sulla or Caesar.

The relatives of Scipio continued to dominate the republic for a couple of generations. This domination came to an end in the tumults between the Gracchi brothers, who were his grandsons, and their other relatives in the period from 133 to 122 BC. The Gracchi brothers championed land redistribution in order to boost the ranks of potential Roman soldiers, as Roman soldiers needed to own land to be enfranchised for service in the legions and the number of Roman land owners was withering. They were lynched by their relatives who disapproved of their methods and perhaps had economic reasons to fear the land redistribution.

After the fall of the Gracchi, the house of Caecilius became more prominent. However, the Scipiones maintained their aristocratic lustre, providing the consular general who unsuccessfully prevented Sulla's second march on Rome and Metellus Scipio whose daughter was the last wife of Pompey the Great, and who took over command in the civil war against Julius Caesar after the death of Pompey. The granddaughter of Gaius Gracchus, Fulvia, was also unusually prominent for a Roman woman in the affairs of the late republic, marrying Publius Clodius, Gaius Curio and Mark Antony in turn. At a later date, some Roman emperors claimed descent from Scipio Africanus.

Cultural depictions

Classical literature

Scipio appears or is mentioned in passing in Cicero's De Republica and De Amicitia, and in Silius Italicus' Punica (Cicero was mentored by prominent Romans whose ancestors had been associated with Scipio). As a Roman hero, Scipio appears in Book VI of the Aeneid where he is shown to Aeneas in a vision in the underworld. Scipio figures prominently in Livy's "Ab urbe condita libri" and is named as an example of a warrior at the end of Book III of Lucretius' De rerum natura.

Medieval literature

Scipio is mentioned four times in Dante's Divine Comedy: in "Inferno"—Canto XXXI, in "Purgatorio"—Canto XXIX, and in "Paradiso"—Cantos VI and XXVII.

Renaissance literature and art

Portrait of Scipio Africanus, marble, c. 1460–1465, by Mino da Fiesole (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

Scipio is the hero of Petrarch's Latin epic Africa. 'The Continence of Scipio' was a stock motif in exemplary literature and art, as was the 'Dream of Scipio', portraying his allegorical choice between Virtue and Luxury. The Continence of Scipio, depicting his clemency and sexual restraint after the fall of Carthago Nova, was an even more popular subject. Versions of the subject were painted by many artists from the Renaissance through to the 19th century, including Andrea Mantegna and Nicolas Poussin.

Scipio is mentioned in Machiavelli's work The Prince (Chapter XVII "Concerning Cruelty And Clemency, And Whether It Is Better To Be Loved Than Feared"). Milton mentions Scipio in Book 9 of Paradise Lost and in Book 3 of Paradise Regained. Raphael's painting Vision of a Knight is thought to be a depiction of Scipio.

Music

Publius Cornelius Scipio was the title character of a number of Italian operas composed during the baroque period of music, including settings by George Frideric Handel, Leonardo Vinci, and Carlo Francesco Pollarolo. The march from Handel's setting, entitled Scipione, remains the regimental slow march of the British Grenadier Guards. Scipio is also referenced in the Italian national anthem.

Film and television

Shortly before Italy's invasion of Ethiopia, Benito Mussolini commissioned an epic film depicting the exploits of Scipio. Scipione l'africano, written by Carmine Gallone, won the Mussolini Cup for the greatest Italian film at the 1937 Venice Film Festival.

In 1971 Luigi Magni scripted and directed the movie Scipione, detto anche l'Africano (Scipio, aka "the African"), starring Marcello Mastroianni, Vittorio Gassman, Silvana Mangano and Woody Strode, in which the historical events are portrayed in a light and satirical mode, with some intentional references to the political events of the time in which the movie was made.

In the 1983 BBC mini-series The Cleopatras, Scipio is portrayed by Geoffrey Whitehead.

In the 2000 film Gladiator, the first battle in the Colosseum is meant to re-enact Scipio Africanus's battle of Zama against Hannibal's barbarian horde. In the film, Maximus ruins the re-enactment by leading the gladiators, who are meant to represent Hannibal's forces, to victory over Scipio's legionaries.

In the 2006 television film Hannibal, he is portrayed by British actor Shaun Dingwall, notably at the battles of Cannae and Zama.

Video games

Scipio features as a playable character, represented by a cataphract, in the Battle of Zama in Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome. He also appears in the Haemimont Games video game Imperivm III: The Great Battles of Rome, Centurion: Defender of Rome, and in the Hannibal at the Gates campaign in Total War: Rome II. Scipio appears twice as a playable character in the Mobile/PC Game Rise of Kingdoms.

Offices

The following table is derived from Broughton 1952, p. 555 unless otherwise indicated.

Year (BC) Office Colleague Comment
216 Military tribune
213 Curule aedile Marcus Cornelius Cethegus
216–210 Proconsul Spain
205 Consul Publius Licinius Crassus Dives Assigned Sicily extra sortem, then further assigned Africa
204–201 Proconsul Continuously prorogued in Africa; victor of Zama in 202
199 Censor Publius Aelius Paetus
199–189 Princeps senatus Chosen princeps senatus in his own censorship
194 Consul Tiberius Sempronius Longus Fought the Boii and Ligurians
193 Legate (ambassador) Sent to Africa to settle boundary dispute and thence possibly to Asia
190 Legate (lieutenant) Served under his brother, Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus
184? Legate? Possibly legate in Etruria

See also

Notes

  1. Etcheto 2012, pp. 274–278.
  2. Zmeskal 2009, p. 97.
  3. Zmeskal 2009, p. 92. Barbatus was consul in 298 and censor in 280; Lucius was consul in 259 and 258 BC.
  4. Zmeskal 2009, pp. 96–97.
  5. Zmeskal 2009, p. 96.
  6. Zmeskal 2009, p. 221.
  7. Briscoe 1989, p. 45.
  8. Broughton 1951, p. 237.
  9. Briscoe 1989, p. 49.
  10. Briscoe 2012; Polyb., 10.3.5. Pliny the Elder, writing in the 1st century AD, mentions that Scipio refused the civic crown for the deed. Goldsworthy 2003, p. 53, citing Plin. NH, 16.14.
  11. ^ Goldsworthy 2003, p. 53.
  12. Broughton 1951, p. 251.
  13. Livy, 22.53. See also, on Metellus, Broughton 1951, p. 260.
  14. Ridley, R T (1975). "Was Scipio Africanus at Cannae?". Latomus. 34 (1): 161–165. ISSN 0023-8856. JSTOR 41529611. Ridley cites Scullard 1929, p. 38.
  15. Broughton 1951, p. 263. Livy, 25.2.6, wrongly dates this to 212 BC; patricians held the curule aedileship in odd years, implying 213. Broughton also dismisses the "story that Scipio won election both for himself and his brother" – originating in Polyb., 10.4–5 – as "intrinsically improbable" and notes its general scholarly rejection. Broughton 1951, p. 267 n. 4.
  16. Livy, 25.2. Livy also records Scipio's response: "If the Quirites are unanimous in their desire to appoint me aedile, I am quite old enough".
  17. Briscoe 1989, p. 57.
  18. Briscoe 1989, pp. 57–59.
  19. Briscoe 1989, p. 59, citing Livy, 35.32–39.
  20. ^ Broughton 1951, p. 280.
  21. ^ Goldsworthy 2003, p. 56.
  22. Briscoe 1989, p. 59; Broughton 1951, p. 280.
  23. ^ Briscoe 2012.
  24. Briscoe 1989, p. 59, citing Livy, 26.17–20.
  25. Polyb., 10.15.4–5.
  26. Baker, Gabriel David (2021). Spare no one: mass violence in Roman warfare. War and Society. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 118–120. ISBN 978-1-5381-1221-2. OCLC 1182021748.
  27. Briscoe 1989, pp. 59–60.
  28. Briscoe 1989, p. 55, citing Livy, 26.38–39, 27.1–2, 27.12–16.
  29. Briscoe 1989, p. 60, citing Polyb., 11.20–24; Livy, 28.1–28.4.4, 12.10–16, 19–21.
  30. Briscoe 1989, p. 60.
  31. Briscoe 1989, p. 62.
  32. ^ Briscoe 1989, p. 63.
  33. Briscoe 1989, pp. 60–61.
  34. Canto, Alicia M (2004). "Itálica, sedes natalis de Adriano. 31 textos históricos y argumentos para una secular polémica (2004)". Athenaeum (in Spanish). 92: 367–408.
  35. Canto, Alicia M (2006). "Sobre el origen bético de Teodosio I el Grande, y su improbable nacimiento en Cauca de Gallaecia (2006)". Latomus (in Spanish). 65 (2): 388–421.
  36. Briscoe 1989, pp. 60–61, citing Livy, 28.38.1 for the turnover in command.
  37. Broughton 1951, pp. 299–300, noting Lentulus was another privatus cum imperio; both Lentulus and Acidinus were prorogued pro consule. Lentulus and Acidinus are those reported at Livy, 28.38.1; Polyb., 11.33.8 instead has Scipio leave Silanus and Lucius Marcius Septimius – one of Scipio's legates – in command.
  38. Broughton 1951, p. 299, citing Livy, 28.38.4, 31.20.3; Polyb., 11.33.7; App. Hisp., 38. Broughton also suggests the possibility of an ovatio.
  39. Gruen 1995, p. 61 n. 3, citing Livy, 28.38.2–4; Val. Max., 2.8.5; Dio, 17.57.6.
  40. Richardson, J S (1975). "The triumph, the praetors and the senate in the early second century BC". Journal of Roman Studies. 65: 50–63. doi:10.2307/370063. ISSN 0075-4358. JSTOR 370063. S2CID 163561022.
  41. Livy, 28.38. "ll the centuries voted amidst much enthusiasm for Scipio... It is recorded that a larger number of voters took part in that election than at any other time during the war. They had come from all parts, not only to give their votes, but also to get sight of Scipio".
  42. Goldsworthy 2003, p. 51.
  43. Drogula 2015, pp. 285, 298–299 n. 4, citing Livy, 28.40.1–2 and Plut. Fab., 25.2.
  44. Briscoe 1989, p. 63; Broughton 1951, p. 301.
  45. Goldsworthy 2003, p. 75.
  46. Drogula 2015, p. 136.
  47. Livy, 28.45–46.
  48. ^ Broughton 1951, p. 301.
  49. Broughton 1951, p. 304.
  50. Goldsworthy 2003, p. 76; Broughton 1951, p. 308.
  51. Broughton 1951, p. 308, citing Livy, 29.24–36, 30.3.3–30.4.12.
  52. Briscoe 1989, p. 63; Broughton 1951, p. 312.
  53. Briscoe 1989, pp. 63–64.
  54. Drogula 2015, p. 313, citing Livy, 30.24.1–4; Broughton 1951, p. 311
  55. Drogula 2015, p. 134 n. 11, citing Livy, 30.27.1–4. Scipio's position was regardless confirmed by plebiscite in Rome. Broughton 1951, pp. 317, 320.
  56. ^ Goldsworthy 2003, p. 76.
  57. Briscoe 1989, p. 64; Broughton 1951, p. 317.
  58. Briscoe 1989, pp. 64–65.
  59. Briscoe 1989, p. 65; Broughton 1951, p. 319.
  60. Broughton 1951, p. 321, citing Polyb., 16.23.5.
  61. Gruen 1995, p. 70, citing Livy, 30.45.3.
  62. Briscoe 1989, pp. 74, 73; Briscoe 2012.
  63. Broughton 1951, p. 327; Briscoe 2012.
  64. Scullard 1970, p. 191.
  65. Gruen, Erich S (1972). "Review of "Scipio Africanus: Soldier and Politician"". American Journal of Philology. 93 (2): 377–380. doi:10.2307/293271. ISSN 0002-9475. JSTOR 293271. Gruen writes also "there is no hint of an eclipse" politically and calls Scullard's inference that there was one "unfounded".
  66. ^ Broughton 1951, p. 343.
  67. Harris, W V. "Roman expansion in the west". In CAH 8 (1989), p. 110. "The reimposition of Roman power in northern Italy had a high priority, and each year from 201 to 190 the senate assigned one or both consuls to that region".
  68. Broughton 1951, pp. 343, 346 n. 1, noting also that both Plutarch and Nepos confuse Scipio Africanus with Scipio Nasica in this year.
  69. Briscoe 2012; Broughton 1951, p. 348.
  70. Briscoe 2012; Broughton 1951, pp. 348–349.
  71. Goldsworthy 2003, p. 77, citing Livy, 35.14.
  72. ^ Errington 1989, p. 283.
  73. Griffith, G T; Sherwin-White, S M; van der Spek, R J (2012). "Antiochus (3) III". Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.505. ISBN 978-0-19-938113-5.
  74. Errington 1989, p. 284.
  75. Broughton 1951, p. 356, 358.
  76. Errington 1989, p. 286.
  77. Errington 1989, p. 288.
  78. Errington 1989, pp. 286–287.
  79. Gruen 1995, p. 65.
  80. Gruen 1995, p. 69.
  81. Briscoe, John (7 March 2016). "Cornelius Scipio Asiagenes, Lucius". Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1868. ISBN 978-0-19-938113-5.
  82. Gruen 1995, p. 71. "ew heights of extravagance".
  83. Gruen 1995, p. 73.
  84. Gruen 1995, p. 87.
  85. Gruen 1995, p. 74. "No reconstruction can reconcile all the conflicting testimony".
  86. Gruen 1995, pp. 75–77, 86.
  87. Gruen 1995, p. 79, citing, among others, Polyb., 23.14.8–11; Livy, 38.55.10–13; Val. Max., 3.7.1d.
  88. Gruen 1995, pp. 80–81.
  89. Gruen 1995, p. 88.
  90. Miles 1995, pp. 59–60, referencing Livy, 39.52.
  91. Lushkov, A Haimson (2014). "Narrative and notice in Livy's fourth decade: the case of Scipio Africanus". Classical Antiquity. 33 (1): 102–129. doi:10.1525/CA.2014.33.1.102. ISSN 0278-6656. S2CID 149035118. Lushkov notes also, p. 121 n. 53, that Livy, 38.56.4 merely claims it is said that statutes of Scipios Africanus and Asiagenes adorn the tomb.
  92. Sen. Ep., 86.1. "I am inclined to think is the tomb of that great warrior".
  93. Richardson, L (1992). A new topographical dictionary of ancient Rome. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 359. ISBN 978-0-8018-4300-6.
  94. ^ Zmeskal 2009, p. 98.
  95. Zmeskal 2009, pp. 22, 21.
  96. Zmeskal 2009, p. 22.
  97. Zmeskal 2009, p. 99.
  98. Zmeskal 2009, p. 100.
  99. Zmeskal 2009, pp. 101–102.
  100. "Barba – NumisWiki, The Collaborative Numismatics Project". Forumancientcoins.com. Retrieved 19 October 2012.
  101. ^ Liddell Hart, Basil (1992) . Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon. Greenhill Books. pp. 2–10, 24, 25, 200–207. ISBN 1-85367-132-0.
  102. Allucius (Livy, History of Rome XXVI.50), cf. Indibilis (Valerius Maximus, Memorable Deeds and Sayings 4.3.1)
  103. Livy, Roman History, XXVI, 50 (extract)
  104. Lefkowitz, Mary; Fant, Maureen (1992). "Women's Life in Greece and Rome (selections): 53. Womanly virtue". Diotíma.
  105. ^ "Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 35, chapter 14". www.perseus.tufts.edu.
  106. Plutarch, Life of Caesar, 52.4–5
  107. Suetonius, Life of Caesar, 59
  108. "Giulio Licinio | The Continence of Scipio | NG643.2 | The National Gallery, London". Nationalgallery.org.uk. Retrieved 19 October 2012.
  109. "Raphael | An Allegory ('Vision of a Knight') | NG213 | The National Gallery, London". Nationalgallery.org.uk. Retrieved 19 October 2012.
  110. "How to get good generals in Centurion: Defender of Rome?". Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  111. Broughton 1951, pp. 250–251.
  112. Broughton 1951, p. 263.
  113. Broughton 1951, p. 317.
  114. ^ Broughton 1951, p. 327.
  115. Broughton 1951, p. 342.
  116. Broughton 1951, pp. 348–349.
  117. Broughton 1951, p. 358.
  118. Broughton 1951, p. 377, citing Livy, 38.56.8–9.

References

Modern sources

Primary sources

Further reading

External links

Political offices
Preceded byL. Veturius Philo
Q. Caecilius Metellus
Roman consul
205 BC
With: P. Licinius Crassus Dives
Succeeded byM. Cornelius Cethegus
P. Sempronius Tuditanus
Preceded byL. Valerius Flaccus
Cato the Censor
Roman consul II
194 BC
With: Ti. Sempronius Longus
Succeeded byL. Cornelius Merula
Q. Minucius Thermus
Preceded byG. Claudius Nero
M. Livius Salinator
Roman censor
199 BC
With: P. Aelius Paetus
Succeeded byG. Cornelius Cethegus
Sex. Aelius Paetus Catus
Categories: