Misplaced Pages

Operation Donnerkeil: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:58, 22 December 2021 editMisterBee1966 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers190,193 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:58, 23 December 2024 edit undoVbbanaz05 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,522 edits Fixing the infobox 
(45 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1942 German military operation}} {{Short description|1942 German military operation}}
{{good article}} {{good article}}

{{Infobox military conflict
{{Copy edit|date=November 2023}}{{Infobox military conflict
| conflict = Operation Donnerkeil | conflict = Operation Donnerkeil
| partof = the ] of ] | partof = the ] of ]
Line 9: Line 10:
| date = 11–12 February 1942 | date = 11–12 February 1942
| place = ], ] and northern ] | place = ], ] and northern ]
|coordinates = {{Coord|50|N|02|W|display=INLINE,title}} | coordinates = {{Coord|50|N|02|W|display=INLINE,title}}
| result = German victory | result = German victory
| combatant1 = {{Flag|United Kingdom}}<br />{{Flagcountry|Canada|1921}} | combatant1 = {{Flag|United Kingdom}}<br />{{Flagcountry|Canada|1921}}
Line 16: Line 17:
| commander2 = {{Flag icon|Nazi Germany}} ]<br />{{Flag icon|Nazi Germany}} ] | commander2 = {{Flag icon|Nazi Germany}} ]<br />{{Flag icon|Nazi Germany}} ]
| strength1 = ~450 aircraft | strength1 = ~450 aircraft
| strength2 = 252 ] and ] fighters<ref name="Caldwell 1996, p. 204">Caldwell 1996, p. 204.</ref><ref name="Weal 1996, p. 15.">Weal 1996, p. 15.</ref><br />30 ] ]s<ref name="Weal 1996, p. 15.">Weal 1996, p. 15.</ref><br />32 ]s | strength2 = 252 ] and ] fighters{{sfn|Caldwell|1996|p=204}}{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=15}}<br />30 ] ]s{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=15}}<br />32 ]s
| casualties1 = <br />41 aircraft<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref> | casualties1 = 41 aircraft{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}}
| casualties2 = 17 fighters<br />5 bombers<br />23 airmen killed<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref> | casualties2 = 17 fighters<br />5 bombers<br />23 airmen killed{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}}
| notes = | notes =
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Western Front (World War II)}} | campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Western Front (World War II)}}
}} }}
'''Unternehmen Donnerkeil''' ('''Operation Thunderbolt''')<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 114.">Hooton 1994, p. 114.</ref>{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=190}}<ref>Forsyth 2009, p. 14.</ref> was the ] for a ] ] of the ]. ''Donnerkeil'' was designed as an ] operation to support the '']{{'s}}'' (German Navy) ], also known as the Channel Dash. '''Unternehmen Donnerkeil''' ('''Operation Thunderbolt'''){{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=190}} was the ] for a ] ] of the ]. ''Donnerkeil'' was an ] operation in support of ], also known as the Channel Dash by the '']'' (German Navy).


In 1941 ''Kriegsmarine'' surface vessels had carried out ] sorties in support of the German ]s in the ]. In January 1941 ] was launched followed by ] in May 1941. The dominance of the ]'s surface fleet prevented the German units returning to ports in the ] or Germany. The surviving ships, the battleships '']'' and '']'' and the cruiser '']'', docked in the port of ]. Throughout 1941 ] attacked the ships in dock. The proximity of the ports to ] (RAF) airfields allowed a large number of sorties to be flown against the targets in quick succession. The '']'' (Naval High Command), and ] desired to move the ships out of range from potential air raids. In 1941 ''Kriegsmarine'' surface vessels had carried out ] in support of the German ]s in the ]. In January 1941 ] was launched followed by ] in May 1941. The dominance of the ]'s surface fleet prevented the German units returning to ports in the ] or Germany. The surviving ships, the battleships '']'' and '']'' and the cruiser '']'', docked in the port of ]. Throughout 1941 ] attacked the ships in dock. The proximity of the ports to ] (RAF) airfields allowed a large number of sorties to be flown against the targets in quick succession. '']'' (the Naval High Command), and ] desired to move the ships out of range of potential air raids.


In December 1941 the '']'' (High Command of the Air Force) was ordered to formulate an air superiority plan for the protection of three German capital ships to escape from France to Germany through the English Channel. '']'' (General of the Fighter Force) ] prepared the aerial assets for the operation. Both ''Cerberus'' and its supporting operation, ''Donnerkeil'', were launched on 11 February 1942. During the first phase of the operation the Germans achieved surprise. The German ships reached Germany on 13 February 1942, just two days after the start of ''Cerberus'' and ''Donnerkeil''. In December 1941, '']'' (High Command of the Air Force) was ordered to plan an operation to protect the three German capital ships to escape from Brest to Germany through the English Channel. '']'' (General of the Fighter Force) ] prepared the aircraft for the operation. ''Cerberus'' and its supporting operation, ''Donnerkeil'', began on 11 February 1942. During the first phase of the operation the Germans achieved surprise. The German ships reached Germany on 13 February 1942, two days after the start of ''Cerberus'' and ''Donnerkeil''.


During the Channel Dash the ''Luftwaffe'' succeeded in defeating air attacks on the German ships during the operation, thus allowing them to reach German waters. In the air battles that took place over the Channel the British suffered heavy losses for a non-existent return. German losses were modest, and the operation achieved its objective. During the Channel Dash the Luftwaffe defeated British air attacks on the German ships, allowing them to reach German waters. In the air battles that took place over the Channel the British suffered many losses for no return; German losses were modest and the operation achieved its objective.


==Background== ==Background==
The first German ]s to dock at Brest were the ''Scharnhorst'' and ''Gneisenau'', on 22 March 1941. In the previous eight weeks, January—March, they had participated in the German ] against Allied shipping in the ]. Just nine weeks later, the ] ''Prinz Eugen'' also sought refuge in the harbour on 1 June 1941, after the failed ] (Operation Exercise Rhine). However, whilst in port, the ships were in easy range of British ] and suffered frequent attacks and some damage. A ten-month offensive by the RAF from 29 March 1941 succeeded in flying 2,928 sorties against the Brest harbour, 171 in daylight. Some of these suffered heavy losses. A raid on 24 July lost 12 percent of its strength. Night bombing was safer as the Germans lacked ]s and the 18 losses to enemy action were claimed by ] (AAA). During the course of their campaign the RAF used more sophisticated navigation aids. On the night of the 7/8 December 1941 the ] was employed for the first time.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 114.">Hooton 1994, p. 114.</ref> The first German ]s to dock at Brest were ''Scharnhorst'' and ''Gneisenau'', on 22 March 1941. In the previous eight weeks they had participated in the German ] against Allied shipping in the ]. The ] ''Prinz Eugen'' also sought refuge in the harbour on 1 June 1941, after the failed ] (Operation Rhine Exercise). Whilst in port, the ships were in easy range of British ] and suffered frequent attacks and some damage. A ten-month offensive by the RAF from 29 March 1941 comprised 2,928 sorties against the Brest harbour and 171 in daylight. A raid on 24 July lost 12 percent of its strength. Night bombing was safer as the Germans lacked ]s and the 18 losses to enemy action were claimed by ]. During their campaign the RAF used more sophisticated navigation aids; on the night of the 7/8 December 1941 the ] was employed for the first time.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}


Concerned after the loss of '']'', ] ordered the ''Kriegsmarine'' to move the ships to Germany for overhauls in preparation for their deployment to Norway. There they were to serve as a ], and as the premier naval defence for German-occupied Norway. After lengthy discussions the '']'' opted for the shorter, but arguably more dangerous route, through the ].<ref name="Weal 1996, p. 15.">Weal 1996, p. 15.</ref><ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 114.">Hooton 1994, p. 114.</ref><ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 89.">Garrett 1978, p. 89.</ref><ref>Blair 1996, pp. 482–483, 487.</ref> Concerned after the loss of '']'', ] ordered the ''Kriegsmarine'' to move the ships to Germany for overhauls in preparation for their deployment to Norway. There they were to serve as a ] and as the premier naval defense for German-occupied Norway. After lengthy discussions the '']'' opted for the shorter but arguably more dangerous route, through the ].{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=15}}{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=89}}{{sfn|Blair|1996|pp=482–483, 487}}


On 12 January 1942 Hitler met with the commanders of the operation at his Headquarters in ] (]). Present were ], Commander-in-Chief of the '']'' (German Armed Forces), ] (Chief of the Luftwaffe General Staff), ] (Chief of Staff for Military Operations) and ], '']'' (General of the Fighter Forces), ] (Commander-in-Chief of the Navy) and ] ], who was to lead the battle group (''Kampfgruppe'').<ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 89.">Garrett 1978, p. 89.</ref> During the course of the meeting Hitler likened the German fleet to "a patient with cancer which is doomed unless they submit to an operation. An operation, on the other hand, even though it may have to be drastic, will at least offer some hope that the patient's life may yet be saved. The passage of our ships is such an operation. It must be attempted".<ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 89.">Garrett 1978, p. 89.</ref> Not much operational detail was discussed. The ''Luftwaffe'' was ordered to provide air cover and diversion raids against British targets. Jeschonnek promised around 250 aircraft.<ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 89.">Garrett 1978, p. 89.</ref> On 12 January 1942 Hitler met with the commanders of the operation at his Headquarters in ] (the ]). Present were ], Commander-in-Chief of the '']'' (German Armed Forces), ] (Chief of the Luftwaffe General Staff), ] (Chief of Staff for Military Operations) and ], '']'' (General of the Fighter Forces), ] (Commander-in-Chief of the Navy) and ] ], who was to lead the battle group (''Kampfgruppe'').{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=89}} During the course of the meeting Hitler likened the German fleet to "a patient with cancer which is doomed unless they submit to an operation. An operation, on the other hand, even though it may have to be drastic, will at least offer some hope that the patient's life may yet be saved. The passage of our ships is such an operation. It must be attempted".{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=89}} Not much operational detail was discussed. The Luftwaffe was ordered to provide air cover and diversion raids against British targets. Jeschonnek promised around 250 aircraft.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=89}}


==Preparations== ==Preparations==


===Luftwaffe plan=== ===Luftwaffe plan===
] ]
The ''OKL'' was not happy about supporting ''Cerberus''. Jeschonnek remarked to Galland that if ''Cerberus'' failed then the ''Luftwaffe'' would be made a ]. Jeschnonnek was to be proved right. During 12 January 1942 meeting, the Navy demanded maximum fighter and won Hitler's support. During the meeting Jeschonnek stood his ground against Galland and refused to guarantee reinforcements to the Western Fighter Forces from other theatres. Galland was given executive power for the air operation which was given the code name ''Unternehmen Donnerkeil'' (Operation Thunderbolt). The existence of the operation was so secret that both Jeschonnek and Galland had to sign secrecy pledges as they left Hitler's Headquarters in East Prussia.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 114.">Hooton 1994, p. 114.</ref> OKL was not happy about ''Cerberus''; Jeschonnek remarked to Galland that if ''Cerberus'' failed then the Luftwaffe would be made a ]. Jeschnonnek was to be proved right. During the 12 January 1942 meeting, the Navy demanded maximum fighter cover and won Hitler's support. During the meeting Jeschonnek stood his ground against Galland and refused to guarantee reinforcements to the Western fighter forces from other theatres. Galland was given executive power for the air operation which was given the code name ''Unternehmen Donnerkeil'' (Operation Thunderbolt). The existence of the operation was so secret that both Jeschonnek and Galland had to sign secrecy pledges as they left Hitler's Headquarters in East Prussia.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}


The details of the plan were worked out with '']'' (]) ], '']'' ]'s chief of staff, '']'' (Air Fleet 3).<ref>Hooton 2010, p. 121.</ref> To assemble sufficient strength some training units had to be mobilised (the bulk of the '']'' was in the ] owing to ]).<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 114.">Hooton 1994, p. 114.</ref> The details of the plan were worked out with '']'' (]) ], the chief of staff of '']'' (Air Fleet 3, '']'' ]).{{sfn|Hooton|2010|p=121}} To assemble sufficient strength some training units had to be mobilized (the bulk of the '']'' was in the ] owing to ]).{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}


The route was subdivided into three sectors based upon the existing ''Jafü'' (Fighter Sector) boundaries, but to ensure local control ], former '']'' (Wing Commander) of '']'' (Fighter Wing 27) was appointed ''Jagdfliegerführer Schiff'', shortened to ''Jafü Schiff'' (meaning Fighter Controller Ship) and embarked onto ''Scharnhorst'' as a signals officer in order to communicate with ''Luftwaffe'' units during the operation. Eight dummy operations, involving around 450 sorties, were made from 22 January to 10 February to train for the mission. It is unclear whether the British were aware of these training missions.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 114.">Hooton 1994, p. 114.</ref> The route was divided into three sectors based upon the ''Jafü'' (Fighter Sector) boundaries but to ensure local control ], former '']'' (Wing Commander) of '']'' (Fighter Wing 27) was appointed ''Jagdfliegerführer Schiff'', shortened to ''Jafü Schiff'' (Fighter Controller Ship) and embarked on ''Scharnhorst'' as a signals officer to communicate with Luftwaffe units during the operation. Eight dummy operations, involving around 450 sorties, were made from 22 January to 10 February to train for the mission. It is unclear whether the British were aware of these training missions.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}


To disrupt British radio transmissions, ]'s unit, the ''Funkhorchdienst'' (Radio Monitoring Service, or ]) attempted to jam radio-telephone frequencies. They created a subtle jamming technique which increased atmospheric interference which degraded the performance of British coastal radars. In addition ]s of '']'' (Bomber Wing 2) was ordered to fly electronic deception missions over the western channel to divert enemy aircraft. ]'s '']'' prepared to strike at RAF bases in south-west England and to engage and slow down British naval forces that might attempt an interception. ''Fernaufklärungsgruppe 123'' (strategic or long-range reconnaissance) was responsible for maintaining reconnaissance in the channel's east and west entrance and was to support ''Fliegerkorps IX''.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 115.">Hooton 1994, p. 115.</ref> To disrupt British radio transmissions, the ''Funkhorchdienst'' (Radio Monitoring Service, ], commanded by ]) attempted to jam radio-telephone frequencies. They created a subtle jamming technique which increased atmospheric interference which degraded the performance of British coastal radars. ]s of '']'' (Bomber Wing 2) was ordered to fly electronic deception missions over the western channel to divert enemy aircraft. '']'' ( ]) prepared to strike at RAF bases in south-western England and to engage and slow down British naval forces that might attempt an interception. ] (strategic or long-range reconnaissance) was responsible for maintaining reconnaissance in the east and west ends of the Channel and was to support ''Fliegerkorps IX''.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=115}}


To ensure constant air support, '']'' (Fighter Wings) and ''Nachtjagdgeschwader'' (Night Fighter Wings) in the shape of '']'', were ordered to achieve a frantic pace in servicing and preparing aircraft for their next mission. To keep a constant aerial vigil over the task force, the 'black men' (mechanics) had to complete rearming and a refuel in 30 minutes or less.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 115.">Hooton 1994, p. 115.</ref> Galland insisted that the air units aircraft should be split between high and low altitude to provide sound cover. The low altitude groups would be able to evade detection by British coastal radar. Galland demanded an umbrella of at least 16 fighters over the ships at any one time along the whole length of the channel. The fighter group would be split into two groups of eight aircraft for their respective patrol altitudes. Each formation was split into two ''Schwärme'' of four aircraft. The ''Schwärme'' tactics involved one formation flying to sea and one to land in a zigzag pattern. All ''Schwärme'' were ordered to fly back and forth along the line of ships in wide figures of eight while maintaining radio silence. Every sortie was meticulously timed to allow the fighters exactly 30 minutes over the ships, enough to maintain cover and allow the relieved units to refuel and rearm and return to start the cycle again. However, during ''Donnerkeil'', the relieving sortie arrived after only 20 minutes which increased the actual fighter cover to 32 fighters for half of the operation.<ref name="Weal 1996, p. 16.">Weal 1996, p. 16.</ref> To ensure constant air support, '']'' (Fighter Wings) and '']'' (Night Fighter Wing 1) were ordered to achieve a frantic pace in servicing and preparing aircraft for their next mission. To keep a constant aerial vigil over the task force, the 'black men' (mechanics) had to rearm and refuel aircraft in 30 minutes or less.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=115}} Galland insisted that the aircraft should be split between high and low altitude to provide sound cover. The low altitude groups would be able to evade detection by British coastal radar. Galland demanded an umbrella of at least 16 fighters over the ships at any one time along the whole length of the channel. The fighters would be split into formations of eight aircraft for their respective patrol altitudes. Each formation was split into two ''Schwärme'' of four aircraft. The ''Schwärme'' tactics involved one formation flying to sea and one to land in a zigzag pattern. All ''Schwärme'' were ordered to fly back and forth along the line of ships in wide figures of eight while maintaining radio silence. Every sortie was meticulously timed to allow the fighters 30 minutes over the ships, enough to maintain cover and allow the relieved units to refuel, rearm and return to start the cycle again. However, during ''Donnerkeil'', the relieving sortie arrived after only 20 minutes which increased the fighter cover to 32 fighters for half of the operation.{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=16}}


Galland made it explicitly clear to fighter pilots the ships must be protected at all costs. They were expected to fly at least four sorties on the day of the operation. Success would not be measured by numbers of enemy aircraft shot down. RAF aircraft leaving the target area were to be avoided, but attacking aircraft were to be engaged at all costs – if necessary, through ].<ref>''Executive Fuller! - The Royal Air Force and the Channel Dash'' By Group Captain Alistair Byford, Air Power Review, Volume 12, Number 3, Autumn 2009, p. 50</ref> Galland made it clear to fighter pilots the ships must be protected at all costs. They were expected to fly at least four sorties on the day of the operation. Success would not be measured by numbers of enemy aircraft shot down. RAF aircraft leaving the target area were to be avoided but attacking aircraft were to be engaged at all costs – if necessary, through ].{{sfn|Byford|2011|p=43}}


===British preparations=== ===British preparations===
RAF forces code-named their response as Operation Fuller. The British Air Forces predicted the Germans might opt to choose the English Channel as their route. Captain Norman Dening, head of the ]’s Operational Intelligence Centre was not certain that the Germans would attempt it, though he regarded as a possibility. At the end of January he had warned that the German warships were preparing to put to sea and a major operation should be expected. Dening sent a message to ] ]: Operation Fuller was the code-name for the RAF plan against a German breakout. The RAF predicted the Germans might opt for the English Channel as their route. Captain Norman Dening, head of the ] Operational Intelligence Centre was not certain that the Germans would attempt it, though he regarded as a possibility. At the end of January he had warned that the German warships were preparing to put to sea and a major operation should be expected. Dening sent a message to ] ]:


<blockquote>The short cut of the German ships is via the English Channel. It is 240 miles from Brest to Cherbourg and another 120 miles from Cherbourg to the Dover straits. While ships could make the passage from Brest to Cherbourg or from Cherbourg to the Dover straits in the same dark period, they could not make the complete passage from Brest to Dover in one dark period. <blockquote>The short cut of the German ships is via the English Channel. It is 240 miles from Brest to Cherbourg and another 120 miles from Cherbourg to the Dover straits. While ships could make the passage from Brest to Cherbourg or from Cherbourg to the Dover straits in the same dark period, they could not make the complete passage from Brest to Dover in one dark period. At first sight this passage from up the Channel seems hazardous for the Germans. It is probable, however, that as their heavy ships are not fully efficient, they would prefer such a passage, relying for their security on the destroyers and aircraft which are efficient, and knowing full well that we have no heavy ships to oppose them in the Channel.... Taking all factors into consideration, it appears that the Germans can pass east up the Channel with much less risk than they will incur if they attempt an ocean passage.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=93}}</blockquote>
At first sight this passage from up the Channel seems hazardous for the Germans. It is probable, however, that as their heavy ships are not fully efficient, they would prefer such a passage, relying for their security on the destroyers and aircraft which are efficient, and knowing full well that we have no heavy ships to oppose them in the Channel...
Taking all factors into consideration, it appears that the Germans can pass east up the Channel with much less risk than they will incur if they attempt an ocean passage.<ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 93.">Garrett 1978, p. 93.</ref></blockquote>


] ], commander-in-chief of ] agreed this was the probable route. He expected the Germans to make an attempt anytime after 10 February. Unfortunately for the British, the ] and the three RAF commands, RAF Coastal Command, ] and ], believed the Germans would use the darkness for the longest and most dangerous part of the journey through the straits and would leave in daylight. The far from adequate forces at their disposal, they believed, would be best used at night. Most of RAF Bomber Command was ordered to stand down accordingly. Such an order made it totally unprepared to strike in daylight hours on 12 February.<ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 93.">Garrett 1978, p. 93.</ref> ] ], commander-in-chief of ] agreed this was the probable route. He expected the Germans to make an attempt any time after 10 February. Unfortunately for the British, the ] and the three RAF commands, RAF Coastal Command, ] and ], believed the Germans would use the darkness for the longest and most dangerous part of the journey through the straits and would leave in daylight. The far from adequate forces at their disposal, they believed, would be best used at night. Most of RAF Bomber Command was ordered to stand down accordingly. Such an order made it unready to operate in daylight on 12 February.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=93}}


Coastal Command had agreed to provide three squadrons of ] ]s. The Fleet Air Arm (FAA) contributed one squadron of ] torpedo bombers. RAF Bomber Command had some 300 bombers on standby for any operation. There were problems, however. The Swordfish were very slow thus escort of the aircraft was difficult. The Beaufort squadrons were all spread out and it was difficult to bring them together. One squadron was based at ], ], one at ], ], England, and one near St Eval, ], England.<ref name="Garrett 1978, p. 93.">Garrett 1978, p. 93.</ref> Coastal Command had agreed to provide three squadrons of ] ]s. The Fleet Air Arm (FAA) contributed one squadron of ] torpedo bombers. RAF Bomber Command had some 300 bombers on standby for an operation. The Swordfish were very slow and escorting them was difficult. The Beaufort squadrons were spread out and it was difficult to bring them together. One squadron was based at ], ], one at ], ] and one near ], ].{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=93}}


==Forces involved== ==Forces involved==


===Luftwaffe=== ===Luftwaffe===
The ''Luftwaffe'' contributed five wings to the operation. '']'' (Fighter Wing 1 or JG 1), '']'' (JG 2), '']'' (JG 26) were equipped with day fighter aircraft, mostly the ] and ]. JG 2 and JG 26 operated the Fw 190, while JG 1 operated the Bf 109. ''Nachtjagdgeschwader'' 1 was also pressed into the air superiority role. Its ]s operated in much smaller numbers. ''Kampfgeschwader'' 2 operated in a support role, mainly ] and air raids on enemy airfields in southern England to distract the RAF from the Channel's airspace. The Germans, in total, had a combined strength of 252 fighters, 30 heavy fighters and 32 bombers.<ref name="Caldwell 1996, p. 204"/><ref name="Weal 1996, p. 15.">Weal 1996, p. 15.</ref><ref>de Zeng ''et al'' 2007, p. 33.</ref> JG 1 and JG 2 operated the Bf 109, while JG 26 maintained a "monopoly" on the Fw 190.<ref>Caygill 2002, p. 41.</ref> The Luftwaffe contributed five wings to the operation. '']'' (Fighter Wing 1 or JG 1), '']'' (JG 2), '']'' (JG 26) equipped with day fighters, mostly the ] and ]. JG 2 and JG 26 operated the FW 190, while JG 1 operated the Bf 109. ''Nachtjagdgeschwader'' 1 was also pressed into service. Its ]s operated in much smaller numbers. ''Kampfgeschwader'' 2 operated in a support role, mainly ] and air raids on enemy airfields in southern England, to distract the RAF from the Channel. The Germans had 252 fighters, 30 heavy fighters and 32 bombers.{{sfn|Caldwell|1996|p=204}}{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=15}}{{sfn|de Zeng|Stanket|Creek|2007|p=33}} JG&nbsp;1 and JG&nbsp;2 operated the Bf&nbsp;109, while JG&nbsp;26 maintained a "monopoly" on the FW&nbsp;190.{{sfn|Caygill|2002|p=41}}<!--The start of the para has JG2 and 26 flying FW 190s-->


===RAF and FAA=== ===RAF and FAA===
Confidence in the British bomber force was low. Having had no anti-shipping attack training, their ability to inflict damage to the ships was poor. The main hope was placed in the torpedo bomber force made up mainly of the Beaufort and Swordfish aircraft of Coastal Command and the Fleet Air Arm. Beauforts of ], ] and ] were made available from Coastal Command for the mission, but were short of torpedoes.<ref name="Goulter 1995, p. 164.">Goulter 1995, p. 164.</ref> The three torpedo squadrons were the only ones available on 12 February 1942. Some 57 ]s had been diverted to other theatres, leaving a chronic shortage of torpedo bombers in Britain at a time when a major enemy naval operation was expected. Moreover, a further two squadrons (] and ]) had been withdrawn to convert to ]s. ] was in the midst of a transfer to the ] at the time of the German operation.<ref>Buckley 1995, p. 198.</ref> Confidence in the British bomber force was low. Having had no anti-shipping attack training, their ability to inflict damage to the ships was poor. The main hope was placed in the torpedo bomber force made up mainly of the Beaufort and Swordfish aircraft of Coastal Command and the Fleet Air Arm. Beauforts of ], ] and ] were made available from Coastal Command for the mission but were short of torpedoes.{{sfn|Goulter|1995|p=164}} The three torpedo squadrons were the only ones available on 12 February 1942; about 57 Beauforts had been diverted to other theatres, leaving a chronic shortage of torpedo bombers in Britain at a time when a major enemy naval operation was expected. ] and ] had been withdrawn to convert to ]s. ] was in the midst of a transfer to the ].{{sfn|Buckley|1995|p=198}}


No. 825 Squadron FAA and their Fairey Swordfish were also made available. ]'s of ] and ] were also committed for reconnaissance operations. ] was recalled from leave to take part in any potential operation in the Channel. Hudsons from ] were also available, and were placed on high alert. They took part in the fighting. RAF Bomber Command contributed its ], containing some 242 of the 300 aircraft available to the service.<ref name="Ashworth 1992, pp. 52–55.">Ashworth 1992, pp. 52–55.</ref> No. 825 Squadron FAA and their Fairey Swordfish were also made available. ]s of ] and ] were also committed for reconnaissance operations. No. 22 Squadron RAF was recalled from leave to take part in an operation over the Channel. Hudsons from ] were also available, were placed on high alert and took part in the fighting. RAF Bomber Command contributed ], containing some 242 of the 300 aircraft available to the service.{{sfn|Ashworth|1992|pp=52–55}} Fighter Command committed ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], 137, ], ], ], ], and ] squadrons.{{sfn|Franks|1998|pp=12–14}}<ref>Hawes, Richard, Worth, Richard and Elrod, John. ''Channel Dash''. Retrieved: 12 September 2010.</ref>

] committed several squadrons to the operation; ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ],{{sfn|Franks|1998|pp=12–14}} ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>Hawes, Richard, Worth, Richard and Elrod, John. ''Channel Dash''. Retrieved: 12 September 2010.</ref>


==Channel Dash== ==Channel Dash==


===Contact=== ===Contact===
] ]
During the evening of the 10 February 1942 the German flotilla prepared to undertake their operation. As they slipped anchor RAF bombers appeared over head. The German ships conducted a U-turn and sped back to the dock. The RAF bombers released their bombs but did little damage. Fortunately for the German ships they did not notice anything untoward.<ref name="Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103.">Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103.</ref> During the evening of the 10 February 1942 the German flotilla prepared to undertake their operation. As they slipped anchor RAF bombers appeared overhead. The German ships conducted a U-turn and sped back to the dock. The RAF bombers released their bombs but did little damage. Fortunately for the German ships the British did not notice anything untoward.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=102–103}}


] intercepts had put the British on alert.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 115.">Hooton 1994, p. 115.</ref> However, a series of mistakes and bad luck enabled the Germans to evade detection. Three ]s of Coastal Command conducted a patrol at three positions. The first, named "Stopper", maintained surveillance between sunset and first light off the port of Brest. The Second, "Line SE" watched due north of the port, and the third, "Habo", covered the area between ] and ]. The patrols lasted between 01:00 hours to dawn on 11 February. At 19:25 on 11 February, "Stopper" took off as usual but was intercepted by a Bf 110 night fighter of NJG 1. The Hudson evaded the Bf 110, but its ASV radar equipment was not serviceable. The aircraft headed back to St. Eval, landing at 20:40. Its replacement headed over the same area, reaching the location at 22:38. It was too late, during the interlude, Ciliax and his ships had slipped their moorings. The “Line SE” Hudson should have picked up the German fleet, but in a repeat incident the ASV failed at 20:55. At 21:50 all attempts to repair it failed, and the Hudson returned to base. No replacement took its place. Everything now depended on "Habo", but Ciliax's luck held. At dawn, mist began to form over the airfield at Thorney Island. The mist was threatening to deny a clear landing run for the Hudson, so it was recalled one hour early, just as the German ships were approaching "Habo’s" zone.<ref name="Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103."/> II./NJG 1 flew 19 sorties, protecting the ships during the night, until replaced by JG 2 at 08:00.<ref name="Hooton 1994, pp. 114.">Hooton 1994, pp. 114.</ref><ref>Treadwell 2003, pp. 92–93.</ref> ] intercepts had put the British on alert.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=115}} Mistakes and bad luck enabled the Germans to evade detection. Three Hudsons of Coastal Command conducted a patrol at three positions. The first, named "Stopper", maintained surveillance between sunset and first light off the port of Brest. The Second, "Line SE" watched due north of the port and the third, "Habo", covered the area between ] and ]. The patrols lasted between 01:00 hours to dawn on 11 February. At 19:25 on 11 February, "Stopper" took off as usual but was intercepted by a Bf 110 night fighter of NJG 1. The Hudson evaded the Bf 110 but its ASV radar equipment was unserviceable. The aircraft headed back to St. Eval, landing at 20:40. Its replacement headed over the same area, reaching the location at 22:38. During the interlude, Ciliax and his ships had slipped their moorings. The "Line SE" Hudson should have picked up the German fleet but its ASV failed at 20:55. At 21:50 attempts to repair it failed and the Hudson returned to base. No replacement took its place. Everything now depended on "Habo" but Ciliax's luck held. At dawn, mist began to form over the airfield at Thorney Island. The mist was threatening to deny a clear landing run for the Hudson, so it was recalled an hour early, just as the German ships were approaching "Habo".{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=102–103}} II./NJG&nbsp;1 flew 19 sorties, protecting the ships during the night, until replaced by JG&nbsp;2 at 08:00.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=114}}{{sfn|Treadwell|2003|pp=92–93}}


For 11 hours the German fleet sailed from Brest into the English Channel to the Dover Straits. By chance, a mechanic on the radar station at ] had just finished repairing the equipment when he picked up 27 echos at 10:15 on 12 February, south of ]. The information was relayed to ] ], who ordered his Air Officer liaison to contact ] to ask for armed reconnaissance. Ramsay also warned ] and the FAA squadron operating out of ] that possible targets were in the Channel, though he did not know the exact number or size of the enemy vessels. The performance of the radar was suppressed because of jamming measures (''Ballstöranlage'') undertaken by two ]s which had been flying off the south coast from their airfield near ]. The flights ceased at 09:00 when installations along the French coast had taken over. The detection by Fairlight was a piece of good fortune, the Germans had assumed it to be out of action.<ref name="Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103."/> Ten ]s from III./KG 2 flew missions against ] harbour and airfield, while 15 flew diversion missions to keep RAF fighters clear of the He 111s.<ref>Hooton 2010, p. 122.</ref> For 11 hours the German fleet sailed from Brest towards the Dover Straits. By chance, a mechanic on the radar station at ] had just finished repairing the equipment when he picked up 27 echoes at 10:15 on 12 February, south of ]. The information was relayed to Ramsay, who ordered his Air Officer liaison to contact ] to ask for armed reconnaissance. Ramsay also warned ] and the FAA squadron from ] that possible targets were in the Channel, though he did not know the exact number or size of the enemy vessels. The performance of the radar was suppressed because of jamming measures (''Ballstöranlage'') undertaken by two ]s which had been flying off the south coast from their airfield near ]. The flights ceased at 09:00 when installations along the French coast had taken over. The detection by Fairlight was a piece of good fortune, the Germans had assumed it to be out of action.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=102–103}} Ten Do 217s from III./KG&nbsp;2 flew missions against ] harbour and airfield, while 15 flew diversions to keep RAF fighters clear of the He&nbsp;111s.{{sfn|Hooton|2010|p=122}}


Ramsay's request arrived at ]. Two experienced pilots, ] ] (10 victories) and ] Finlay Boyd (14 victories), were sent on patrol to investigate. Flying over the channel in Spitfires, they ran into large numbers of Bf 109s protecting a large fleet of warships and dived away. Holding radio silence they kept their discovery until they landed. They sighted the ships at 10:42 and landed at 11:09. It was another 16 minutes before Bomber Command was alerted and Ramsay did not know of the situation until 11:30.<ref name="Weal 1996, p. 16.">Weal 1996, p. 16.</ref><ref name="Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103."/> Soon afterwards, at around 12:16 ], the first naval actions began between escorting ]s and British ]s (MTBs) and the British commands were finally alerted.<ref>Garrett 1978, pp. 99–100.</ref> Galland ordered all low flying to cease and allowed Max Ibel and his team aboard ''Scharnhorst'' to break radio silence. Ibel then began directing Fw 190 and Bf 109s toward RAF units heading to the area. As the first outnumbered British units entered the airspace over the ships, the German vessels were now at their closest point to German airfields. It allowed the ''Luftwaffe'' to offer maximum protection.<ref>Kaplan 2007, p. 34.</ref> Ramsay's request arrived at ]. Two experienced pilots, ] ] (10 victories) and ] Finlay Boyd (14 victories), were sent on patrol to investigate. Flying over the channel in Spitfires, they ran into large numbers of Bf&nbsp;109s protecting a large fleet of warships and dived away. Holding radio silence they kept their discovery until they landed. They sighted the ships at 10:42 and landed at 11:09. It was another 16 minutes before Bomber Command was alerted and Ramsay did not know of the situation until 11:30.{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=16}}{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=102–103}} At around 12:16 ], the first naval actions began between escorting ]s and British ]s (MTBs) and the British commands were finally alerted.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=99–100}} Galland ordered all low flying to cease and allowed Max Ibel and his team aboard ''Scharnhorst'' to break radio silence. Ibel then began directing Fw&nbsp;190 and Bf&nbsp;109s towards RAF units heading to the area. As the first outnumbered British units arrived over the ships, the German vessels were now at their closest point to German airfields. It allowed the Luftwaffe to offer maximum protection.{{sfn|Kaplan|2007|p=34}}


===Main assaults=== ===Main assaults===
] ]
] ], acting as Squadron Leader, No. 825 Squadron FAA took off with his ] formation at 12:25 to attack the ships. No. 411 and 64 Squadron were to escort the FAA but arrived over Manston 15 minutes late and missed the rendezvous. The only unit to keep to mission orders was Squadron Leader ]'s No. 72 Squadron. Unaware of the Swordfish squadron's location, they ran into each other by fortunate accident. Owing to low cloud cover, they dropped to between 50 and 100 feet. The heavy German fighter cover put an end to the protection the Spitfire's could provide as the RAF fighters now had to look after themselves. The Spitfires and Swordfish were engaged by Fw 190s of ''8 staffel'' and ''9 staffel''./JG 26 led by '']'' (Group Commander) ] of III./JG 26. The Fw 190s were just relieving fighters of JG 2. Frail and slow, the Swordfish forced German pilots to lower their undercarriages to prevent overshooting the biplanes. In the event all six Swordfish were shot down. The Spitfires destroyed three Fw 190s in return. Several Swordfish managed to fire off their torpedoes but none found their mark. Lieutenant Commander Esmonde was shot down and killed by an Fw 190.<ref name="Weal 1996, p. 17.">Weal 1996, p. 17.</ref> He was awarded the ]. Only five of the original eighteen Swordfish crew survived. No. 41 Squadron RAF claimed three Bf 109s (most likely from JG 1) destroyed and one damaged off the Belgian coast. No. 72 Squadron claimed three Fw 190s destroyed and four damaged in the battles around 13:00. No. 410 Squadron claimed two Bf 109s destroyed and two damaged in the same dogfights.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 115.">Hooton 1994, p. 115.</ref><ref name="Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103."/><ref name="Weal 1996, p. 17.">Weal 1996, p. 17.</ref><ref>Foreman 2005, pp. 127–128</ref><ref>Caldwell 1996, p. 207.</ref><ref>Jackson 2002, pp. 56–57.</ref> The German ships consumed very little ammunition, as the action had been carried out largely by the ''Luftwaffe''.<ref>Garrett 1978, p. 104.</ref> ] ], acting as Squadron Leader, No. 825 Squadron FAA, took off with his Swordfish formation at 12:25 to attack the ships. No. 411 and 64 Squadrons were to escort the FAA but arrived over Manston 15 minutes late and missed the rendezvous. The only unit to keep to mission orders was No. 72 Squadron (Squadron Leader ]). Unaware of the Swordfish squadron's location, they ran into each other by accident. Owing to low cloud, they dropped to between 50 and 100 feet. The German fighter cover put an end to the protection the Spitfire's could provide as the RAF fighters now had to look after themselves. The Spitfires and Swordfish were engaged by Fw&nbsp;190s of 8. ''Staffel'' and 9. ''Staffel'' of JG&nbsp;26 led by '']'' (Group Commander) ] of III./JG&nbsp;26. The Fw&nbsp;190s were just relieving fighters of JG 2. Frail and slow, the Swordfish forced German pilots to lower their undercarriages to prevent overshooting the biplanes. In the event all six Swordfish were shot down. The Spitfires destroyed three Fw&nbsp;190s in return. Several Swordfish managed to drop torpedoes but none found their mark. Esmonde was shot down and killed by a FW&nbsp;190.{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=17}} He was awarded the ]. Only five of the original eighteen Swordfish crew survived. No. 41 Squadron RAF claimed three Bf&nbsp;109s (most likely from JG 1) destroyed and one damaged off the Belgian coast. No. 72 Squadron claimed three Fw&nbsp;190s destroyed and four damaged in the battles around 13:00. No. 410 Squadron claimed two Bf&nbsp;109s destroyed and two damaged in the same dogfights.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=115}}{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=102–103}}{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=17}}{{sfn|Foreman|2005|pp=127–128}}{{sfn|Caldwell|1996|p=207}}{{sfn|Jackson|2002|pp=56–57}} The German ships consumed very little ammunition, as the action had been carried out largely by the Luftwaffe.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=104}}


The stand down order had meant RAF Bomber Command's contribution to the proceedings came relatively late in the day. It dispatched a total of 73 bombers at between 13:55 and 14:50 (]). None of the attackers succeeded in hitting their targets. At 14:35 nine ]s from No. 42 Squadron led by W.H Cliff took off. Arriving over Manston at 14:50 they found other aircraft from No. 407 RCAF orbiting. It took nearly 30 minutes to form a proper formation. With several other squadrons they attacked the ''Gneisenau'' and ''Prinz Eugen'' at heights of between 60 and 100 feet but their torpedoes missed. No losses were suffered by No. 42 Squadron. The Hudsons struck at between 400 and 900 feet. Two RCAF bombers were lost without success. No. 217 Squadron nearly achieved a hit on ''Gneisenau'', but the ship turned away, just missing the salvo. Later, another wave of 134–137 bombers intercepted the ships between 16:00 and 17:05. Only 20 crews managed to make attacks owing to poor training (Bomber Command crews were not trained to hit naval targets), a low cloud base (700 metres) and poor visibility (sea level visibility was between 1,000 and 2,000 yards). Nine bombers were lost. Another formation of 35 ] aircraft attempted a strike between 17:50 and 18:15, losing two of their number. The most notable raid in this action was by six Beauforts from No. 86, three from No. 217 and three from No. 22 Squadron. Wing Commander C. Flood, No. 86 Squadron led the attack in the only ASV-loaded aircraft. Locating the German ships in the darkness they attacked, but heavy AAA fire scattered the bombers and no successes were achieved. Of the 242 bombers that took part in the missions, it is likely only 39 conducted attacks, though it is possible that a further 16 carried out attacks, suggesting a total of 54 aircraft actually released their bombs against the ships. Of this total 15 of those were shot down. RAF Fighter Command also threw in fighter-bombers to try and inflict damage, operating Hawker Hurricanes over the Dover area.<ref name="Ashworth 1992, pp. 52–55."/>{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=189}}<ref>Garrett 1978, p. 107.</ref><ref>Goulter 1995, p. 163.</ref> The stand down order had meant RAF Bomber Command's contribution to the proceedings came relatively late in the day. It dispatched 73 bombers from 13:55 to 14:50 GMT. None of the attackers hit their targets. At 14:35 nine Beauforts from No. 42 Squadron led by W.H Cliff took off. Arriving over Manston at 14:50 they found other aircraft from No. 407 Squadron RCAF orbiting. It took nearly 30 minutes to form a proper formation. With several other squadrons they attacked the ''Gneisenau'' and ''Prinz Eugen'' at heights of between 60 and 100 feet but their torpedoes missed. No losses were suffered by No. 42 Squadron. The Hudsons struck at between 400 and 900 feet. Two RCAF bombers were lost without success. No. 217 Squadron nearly achieved a hit on ''Gneisenau'' but the ship turned away, just avoiding the salvo. Later, a wave of 134 to 137 bombers intercepted the ships between 16:00 and 17:05. Only 20 crews managed to attack owing to poor training (Bomber Command crews were not trained for naval targets), a low cloud base and poor visibility . Nine bombers were lost. Another formation of 35 ] aircraft attempted a strike between 17:50 and 18:15, losing two of their number. The most notable raid in this action was by six Beauforts from No. 86, three from No. 217 and three from No. 22 Squadron. Wing Commander C. Flood, No. 86 Squadron led the attack in the only ASV-equipped aircraft. Locating the German ships in the darkness they attacked but anti-aircraft fire scattered the bombers and no successes were achieved. Of the 242 bombers that took part in the missions, it is likely only 39 conducted attacks, with a possible that a 16, suggesting a total of 54 aircraft released bombs against the ships, of which 15 were shot down. RAF Fighter Command also threw in fighter-bombers to try and inflict damage, operating Hawker Hurricanes over the Dover area.{{sfn|Ashworth|1992|pp=52–55}}{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=189}}{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=107}}{{sfn|Goulter|1995|p=163}}


The only success the British managed to achieve was to damage both the ''Gneisenau'' and ''Scharnhorst'' (the latter seriously). ''Scharnhorst'' hit two mines, one at 14:31 GMT, and a further one at 21:34 GMT. ''Gneisenau'' also struck a mine at 18:55 GMT.<ref>Garrett 1978, p. 95.</ref> Both ships recovered and steamed on. ''Scharnhorst'' had been stopped dead in the water with engine damage after the first hit. The failure to alert Bomber Command earlier meant a chance was missed to deliver an attack on ''Scharnhorst'' when it was most vulnerable. The second and third mine hits came after nightfall, which enabled both vessels to avoid further attacks. The last RAF sighting of the ships had occurred at 18:00 GMT.<ref>Garrett 1978, p. 111.</ref> The British managed to damage both the ''Gneisenau'' and ''Scharnhorst'' (the latter seriously). ''Scharnhorst'' hit two mines, one at 14:31 GMT and a further one at 21:34 GMT. ''Gneisenau'' also struck a mine at 18:55 GMT.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=95}} Both ships recovered and steamed on. ''Scharnhorst'' had been stopped dead in the water with engine damage after the first hit. The failure to alert Bomber Command earlier meant a chance was missed to deliver an attack on ''Scharnhorst'' when it was most vulnerable. The second and third mine hits came after nightfall, which enabled both vessels to avoid further attacks. The last RAF sighting of the ships had occurred at 18:00 GMT.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=111}} It is unclear who was responsible for the damage on the German ships. It is possible that the mines were dropped by Hampden bombers. Should this be the case, the bombers achieved far more damage than the Royal Navy and the rest of the RAF combined.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|p=119}}

It is unclear exactly who was responsible for the damage on the German ships. It is possible that the mines were air-dropped by RAF ] bombers. Should this be the case, the bombers achieved far more damage than the Royal Navy and the rest of the RAF combined.<ref>Garrett 1978, p. 119.</ref>


===Losses and overclaiming=== ===Losses and overclaiming===
In protecting the RAF bombers, Fighter Command lost 20 fighters, 14 pilots killed and three captured. Only eight of the RAF fighters were shot down by the ''Luftwaffe''. A further eight were shot down by AAA fire, two collided and two were lost to unknown causes. Ten of the fighters were Spitfires, six were Hawker Hurricanes and four were ].{{sfn|Franks|1998|pp=13–14}} During the air battles, mutual ] took place, though the ''Luftwaffe'' was significantly worse. RAF Fighters claimed 16 Bf 109s destroyed and 13 damaged. Four Fw 190s were also claimed destroyed and six damaged. Actual German losses amounted to 17 fighters, along with five Do 217s. Human casualties amounted to 23 killed. German fighter units claimed 60 RAF aircraft shot down, with JG 26 awarded seven kills and six probable victories. Actual British losses were 41, a number of which were lost to AAA fire.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref><ref>Foreman 2005, pp. 127–130.</ref><ref name="Weal 1996, p. 18.">Weal 1996, p. 18.</ref> III./KG 2 had participated in raids against RAF airfields.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 115.">Hooton 1994, p. 115.</ref> The ''Luftwaffe'' had flown 300 fighter and 40 bomber missions during the 11–12 February.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref> In protecting the RAF bombers, Fighter Command lost 20 fighters, 14 pilots killed and three captured. Only eight of the RAF fighters were shot down by the Luftwaffe. A further eight were shot down by anti-aircraft fire, two collided and two were lost to unknown causes. Ten of the fighters were Spitfires, six were Hawker Hurricanes and four were ].{{sfn|Franks|1998|pp=13–14}} During the air battles, mutual ] took place, though the Luftwaffe was significantly worse. RAF Fighters claimed 16 Bf 109s destroyed and 13 damaged. Four Fw&nbsp;190s were also claimed destroyed and six damaged. German losses were 17 fighters, along with five Do 217s. Human casualties amounted to 23 killed. German fighter units claimed 60 RAF aircraft shot down, with JG&nbsp;26 awarded seven kills and six probables. British losses were 41, a number of which were lost to anti-aircraft fire.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}}{{sfn|Foreman|2005|pp=127–130}}{{sfn|Weal|1996|p=18}} The bomber unit III./KG 2 had participated in raids against RAF airfields.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=115}} The Luftwaffe had flown 300 fighter and 40 bomber missions during 11–12 February.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}}


==Attacks in port== ==Attacks in port==
The German flotilla had reached home ports on the evening of 12 February. However, while the threat from RAF bombers in daylight had now gone, Bomber Command was soon making night bombing attacks on ]’s port. ''Gneisenau'' was moved into an inner basin alongside her depot ship, ''Monte Olivia''. The hatches were left open and her tanks, still containing a large amount of fuel, were left unattended. RAF Bomber Command made its first attack on the night of the 25/26 February, when 61 bombers flew over Kiel. ''Monte Olivia'' was destroyed but ''Gneisenau'' escaped. On 26/27 February another 61 RAF bombers returned. A bomb penetrated ''Gneisenau''{{'}}s foredeck and exploded. The oil fumes from the tanks ignited and the ship was engulfed in fire from her bow to the Anton turret. The entire forward part of the bow needed to be replaced. She steamed to Gdynia, in ] on 4 April where she was decommissioned out of range of RAF bombers. ''Gneisenau'' did not put to sea again.<ref>Garrett 1978, pp. 119–121.</ref> The raid cost three aircraft, one Hampton and two Wellingtons. German casualties amounted to 16 civilians and 116 sailors dead.<ref name="MOD"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070607044832/http://www.raf.mod.uk/bombercommand/feb42.html |date=7 June 2007 }} ''Ministry of Defence'' 2004. Retrieved: 20 September 2010.</ref> The German flotilla had reached home ports on the evening of 12 February. The threat from RAF bombers in daylight had gone but Bomber Command was soon making night attacks on ] harbour. ''Gneisenau'' was moved into an inner basin alongside her depot ship, ''Monte Olivia''. The hatches were left open and her tanks, still containing a large amount of fuel, were left unattended. RAF Bomber Command made its first attack on the night of 25/26 February, when 61 bombers flew over Kiel. ''Monte Olivia'' was destroyed but ''Gneisenau'' escaped. On 26/27 February another 61 RAF bombers returned. A bomb penetrated ''Gneisenau''{{'}}s foredeck and exploded. The oil fumes from the tanks ignited and the ship was engulfed in fire from her bow to turret Anton. The forward part of the bow needed to be replaced. She steamed to Gdynia, in ] on 4 April where she was decommissioned out of range of RAF bombers. ''Gneisenau'' did not put to sea again.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=119–121}} The raid cost three aircraft, one Hampden and two Wellingtons. German casualties amounted to 16 civilians and 116 sailors dead.<ref name="MOD"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070607044832/http://www.raf.mod.uk/bombercommand/feb42.html |date=7 June 2007 }} ''Ministry of Defence'' 2004. Retrieved: 20 September 2010.</ref>


On 27/28 February 1942 33 bombers flew over ] looking for ''Scharnhorst''. Cloud obscured the target area and German reports noted only three explosions. Three ] bombers were lost to unstated causes.<ref name="MODa"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070607044832/http://www.raf.mod.uk/bombercommand/feb42.html |date=7 June 2007 }} ''Ministry of Defence'' 2004. Retrieved: 20 September 2010.</ref> In 1942 ''Scharnhorst'' had evaded the worst attacks from RAF Bomber Command. It was ready for redeployment by the summer, but a series of accidents, such as striking a mine and running aground meant this was delayed until the turn of the year. The ship made three unsuccessful attempts to sail to Norway. On 10 January 1943 she was spotted by RAF aircraft and turned back after reaching only the ]. Another attempt was tried in January but failed. On 3 March 1943 ''Scharnhorst'' finally made it to Norway.<ref>Garrett 1978, pp. 126–127.</ref> She would survive another eight months before being sent on her last wartime mission, ]. During her sortie ''Scharnhorst'' was sunk at the ].<ref>Garrett 1978, pp. 138–163.</ref><ref>Winton 2003, pp. 130–160.</ref> On 27/28 February 1942 33 bombers flew over ] looking for ''Scharnhorst''. Cloud obscured the area and German reports noted only three explosions. Three ] bombers were lost to unstated causes.<ref name="MODa"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070607044832/http://www.raf.mod.uk/bombercommand/feb42.html |date=7 June 2007 }} ''Ministry of Defence'' 2004. Retrieved: 20 September 2010.</ref> In 1942 ''Scharnhorst'' had evaded the worst attacks from RAF Bomber Command. It was ready for redeployment by the summer but accidents, such as striking a mine and running aground meant this was delayed until the turn of the year. It took three attempts to sail to Norway; on 10 January 1943 she was spotted by RAF aircraft and turned back after reaching the ]. Another attempt was in January failed. On 3 March 1943 ''Scharnhorst'' finally made it to Norway.{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=126–127}} She would survive another eight months before being sent on her last wartime mission, ]. During her sortie ''Scharnhorst'' was sunk at the ].{{sfn|Garrett|1978|pp=138–163}}{{sfn|Winton|2003|pp=130–160}}


==Aftermath== ==Aftermath==


===British failures=== ===British failures===
The failure to coordinate the FAA, RAF and Navy dispersed any counterstrike. Confusion owing to the weather and the lack of any centralised control of British sea and air forces caused each element to work independently of one another. This caused several ] incidents, such as the attack by No. 217 Squadron on HMS ''Mackay''. The most serious failure was Fighter Command's failure to provide adequate protection to bomber and naval forces. Although the weather also prevented greater German fighter activity by the time the target area was reached, valuable time had been lost by bomber formations searching for their fighter escorts over the rendezvous positions which either never arrived or were given incorrect orders or direction too late to be acted upon. Little communication was enabled between fighter and bomber units, but also between the strike units themselves. Compounding the problems, RAF Bomber Command's crews, which made up the majority of the strike forces, were not trained for attacks against naval targets. The only anti-shipping torpedo-bomber squadrons were No. 42 and 217 Squadrons of Coastal Command, which owing to logistical issues, were five torpedoes short of their total complement.<ref name="Goulter 1995, p. 164.">Goulter 1995, p. 164.</ref> The failure to coordinate the FAA, RAF and Navy dispersed any counterstrike. Confusion owing to the weather and the lack of central control of British sea and air forces caused each element to work independently. Several ] incidents occurred, such as the attack by No. 217 Squadron on HMS ''Mackay''. The most serious failure was Fighter Command's failure to protect bomber and naval forces. Although the weather also prevented greater German fighter activity by the time the target area was reached, valuable time had been lost by bomber formations searching for their fighter escorts over the rendezvouses which either never arrived or were given incorrect orders or direction too late to be acted upon. Little communication was enabled between fighter and bomber units but also between the strike units. Compounding the problems, RAF Bomber Command's crews, which made up the majority of the attacking aircraft, were not trained for attacks against naval targets. The only anti-shipping torpedo-bomber squadrons were No. 42 and 217 Squadrons of Coastal Command, which owing to supply difficulties, were five torpedoes short.{{sfn|Goulter|1995|p=164}}


Air Marshal ], RAF Coastal Command, blamed the failure of Operation ''Fuller'' on the neglect of anti-shipping aviation, not to those directing the forces during the operation or intelligence services. Joubert called for all anti-shipping units to be handed over to the service. Better training, more aircraft and a higher quality of equipment would allow the RAF to avoid a repeat of the Channel Dash. The Air Ministry refused his request and instead put ] Bomber Command in support of Coastal units against enemy shipping between ] and ].<ref>Goulter 1995, p. 165.</ref> Production and procurement remained in favour of Bomber Command, producing types for the ] campaign over Germany, even after the failure of ''Fuller''. Adding to the RAF's difficulty, most of Coastal Command's anti-shipping units were withdrawn to the more essential ] (MTO), leaving Coastal Command short of naval strike aircraft in 1942. Air Marshal ] agreed this needed to change arguing, "We agree on the importance of torpedo bomber aircraft, and this was proved completely during the passage of the ''Scharnhorst'' and ''Gneisenau'' up the channel".<ref name="Goulter 1995, p. 166–167.">Goulter 1995, pp. 166–167.</ref> In May 1942 Joubert succeeded in procuring the new ], which entered service in November 1942. However, only one squadron was made operational. Despite the need for anti-shipping strike aircraft, the service continued to struggle until 1943, when Portal fulfilled his promise and more of these aircraft, including the ], became available.<ref name="Goulter 1995, p. 166–167."/> Joubert de la Ferté blamed the failure of Operation Fuller on the neglect of anti-shipping aviation, not to those directing the forces during the operation or intelligence services. Joubert called for all anti-shipping units to be handed over to the service. Better training, more aircraft and a higher quality of equipment would allow the RAF to avoid a repeat of the Channel Dash. The Air Ministry refused his request and instead put ] Bomber Command in support of Coastal units against enemy shipping between ] and Wilhelmshaven.{{sfn|Goulter|1995|p=165}} Production and procurement remained in favour of Bomber Command, producing types for the ] campaign over Germany, even after the failure of Fuller. Adding to RAF difficulties, most of Coastal Command's anti-shipping units were transferred to the ] (MTO), leaving Coastal Command short of naval strike aircraft in 1942. Air Marshal ] agreed this needed to change arguing, "We agree on the importance of torpedo bomber aircraft, and this was proved completely during the passage of the ''Scharnhorst'' and ''Gneisenau'' up the channel".{{sfn|Goulter|1995|pp=166–167}} In May 1942 Joubert succeeded in procuring the new ], which entered service in November 1942 but only one squadron was made operational. Despite the need for anti-shipping strike aircraft, the service continued to struggle until 1943, when Portal fulfilled his promise and more of these aircraft, including the ], became available.{{sfn|Goulter|1995|pp=166–167}}


''Donnerkeil'' also proved to be a watershed in electronic warfare, for by using jamming techniques, Wolfgang Martini removed British inhibitions concerning the use of ] against the German defensive system (]) and paved the way for the debut of ] in June 1943, which had a devastating effect on the ability of German night-fighter radar defences to locate and intercept RAF bombers during the ]. The first step in this campaign was a ] operation, ], to steal a ] set on 27/28 February 1942. The British removed components and developed counter-measures. The Germans responded by fortifying all radar sets, which only made them more visible for RAF aerial reconnaissance. The British also began the occasional jamming of ] sets. The Germans did not realise this was happening until September 1942. German forces also used offensive jamming of British radar, to enable fighter-bomber operations over England. The British described them as a "real menace". Radar-jamming, counter-measures and other innovations escalated from that point onward.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref> ''Donnerkeil'' was a watershed in electronic warfare, by jamming, Martini removed British inhibitions concerning the use of ] against the ] on the Continent and paved the way for the debut of ] (Chaff) in June 1943, which had a devastating effect on the ability of German night-fighter radar defences to locate and intercept RAF bombers during the ]. The first step in this campaign was a ] operation, ], to steal a ] set on 27/28 February 1942. The British removed components and developed counter-measures. The Germans responded by fortifying all radar sets, which only made them more visible to RAF reconnaissance. The British also began the occasional jamming of ] sets. The Germans did not realise this was happening until September 1942. German forces also jammed British radar, to enable fighter-bomber operations over England. The British described them as a "real menace". Radar-jamming, counter-measures and other innovations escalated from that point onward.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}}


===German perspective=== ===German perspective===
Operation ''Donnerkeil'' had been an outstanding success for the Luftwaffe.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref> The measure of success lay not in the ratio of losses, which amounted to 2:1 in the German favour, but the failure of the RAF, FAA and Royal Navy to intercept or at least inflict severe damage to the German warships. The meagre forces committed by the Navy had been repulsed easily by the German warships and their escorts. Heavy AAA fire had offered a helpful defence against air attack, but the German air defence had succeeded, along with poor weather, in breaking up RAF assaults on the ships. Galland, responsible for the plan, called it the high point of his career.{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=190}} ''Donnerkeil'' had been an outstanding success for the Luftwaffe.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}} The measure of success lay not in the ratio of losses, which amounted to 2:1 in the German favour but the failure of the RAF, FAA and Royal Navy to intercept or at least inflict severe damage to the German warships. The meagre forces committed by the Navy had been repulsed easily by the German warships and their escorts. Anti-aircraft fire had offered a helpful defence against air attack but the German aircraft had succeeded, along with poor weather, in breaking up RAF attacks on the ships. Galland, responsible for the plan, called it the high point of his career.{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=190}}


However, for the ''Kriegsmarine'', Operation ''Cerberus'' had been operational success, but a strategic reverse. The present situation had forced them into an operation which was in effect, a strategic withdrawal from the Atlantic. From that point onwards, the German campaign in the Atlantic was to be carried by the U-boats, unsupported by a surface fleet. With the German ships removed from the French Atlantic ports, the British fleets could contain them much more effectively in Norway and the North Sea. Moreover, ''Scharnhorst'' and ''Gneisenau'' had been damaged by mines and required extensive repairs. ''Prinz Eugen'' was torpedoed and her ] collapsed just weeks after Cerberus. All three ships were out of action for extended periods. More bad luck followed, with ''Gneisenau'' being knocked out for good in February 1942 and the sinking of the ''Scharnhorst'' in December 1943. None of the ships sailed in the Atlantic again in the intervening period, leaving the Battle of the Atlantic to be carried on by U-boat forces.<ref name="Hooton 1994, p. 116.">Hooton 1994, p. 116.</ref>{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=190}}<ref>Jackson 2002, p. 59.</ref> For the ''Kriegsmarine'', ''Cerberus'' had been operational success and a strategic reverse. The situation had forced them into a strategic withdrawal from the Atlantic. From that point onwards, the German campaign in the Atlantic was to be carried by the U-boats, unsupported by a surface fleet. With the German ships removed from the French Atlantic ports, the British fleets could contain them much more effectively in Norway and the North Sea. ''Scharnhorst'' and ''Gneisenau'' had been damaged by mines and required extensive repairs. ''Prinz Eugen'' was torpedoed and her ] collapsed just weeks after ''Cerberus''. All three ships were out of action for extended periods. More bad luck followed, with ''Gneisenau'' being knocked out for good in February 1942 and the sinking of the ''Scharnhorst'' in December 1943. None of the ships sailed in the Atlantic again, leaving the Battle of the Atlantic to be carried on by U-boat forces.{{sfn|Hooton|1994|p=116}}{{sfn|Baker|1996|p=190}}{{sfn|Jackson|2002|p=59}}


==Notes== ==References==
===Citations===
{{Reflist|3}} {{Reflist|3}}


==References== ===Bibliography===
{{Refbegin}} {{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite book
* Ashworth, Chris. ''RAF Coastal Command: 1936–1969''. Patrick Stephens Ltd. 1992. {{ISBN|1-85260-345-3}}
|last=Ashworth
|first=Chris
|year=1992
|title=RAF Coastal Command: 1936–1969
|publisher=Patrick Stephens Ltd
|isbn=978-1-85260-345-8
}}
* {{Cite book * {{Cite book
|last=Baker |last=Baker
Line 135: Line 138:
|isbn=978-1-85915-017-7 |isbn=978-1-85915-017-7
}} }}
* {{cite book
* Blair, Clay. ''Hitler's U-boat War: The Hunters 1939–1942'' Cassel & Co. 1996. {{ISBN|0-304-35260-8}}
|last=Blair
* ]. ''The RAF and Trade Defence, 1919–1945: Constant Endeavour''. Ryburn Publishing. 1995. {{ISBN|1-85331-069-7}}
|first=Clay Jr.
* Caldwell, Donald L. (1994). ''JG 26 Photographic History of the Luftwaffe's Top Gun''. Motorbooks International Publishers & Wholesalers. {{ISBN|0-87938-845-5}}.
|author-link=Clay Blair
* Caldwell, Donald; Muller Richard (2007). ''The Luftwaffe Over Germany: Defense of the Reich''. Greenhill books. {{ISBN|978-1-85367-712-0}}.
|title=Hitler's U-Boat War: The Hunters 1939–1942
* Caygill, Peter. ''Focke-Wulf Fw 190''. Crowood Press, London. 2002. {{ISBN|978-1-84037-366-0}}
|volume=I
* ]. ''The Birds and the Fishes: The Story of Coastal Command''. Hutchinson. 1960. (No ISBN)
|publisher=Cassell
* de Zeng, H. L., D. G. Stanket and E. J. Creek. ''Bomber Units of the Luftwaffe 1933–1945: A Reference Source, Volume 2''. London: Ian Allan Publishing, 2007. {{ISBN|978-1-903223-87-1}}.
|year=1996
|isbn=978-0-304-35260-9
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Buckley
|first=John
|author-link=John Buckley (historian)
|year=1995
|title=The RAF and Trade Defence, 1919–1945: Constant Endeavour
|publisher=Ryburn Publishing
|isbn=978-1-85331-069-0
}}
* {{Cite magazine
|last=Byford
|first=Alistair
|year=2011
|title=Executive Fuller! – The Royal Air Force and the Channel Dash
|magazine=The Royal Air Force Air Power Review
|volume=50
|location=Witney
|publisher=Royal Air Force Historical Society
|url=https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/research/RAF-Historical-Society-Journals/Journal-50.pdf
|df=dmy-all
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Caldwell
|first=Donald L.
|year=1996
|title=The JG 26 War Diary: Volume One 1939–1942
|place=London, UK
|publisher=Grubstreet
|isbn=978-1-898697-52-7
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Caygill
|first=Peter
|year=2002
|title=Focke-Wulf Fw 190
|publisher=Crowood Press
|location=London
|isbn=978-1-84037-366-0
}}
* {{Cite book
|last1=de Zeng
|first1=H. L.
|last2=Stanket
|first2=D. G.
|last3=Creek
|first3=E. J.
|title=Bomber Units of the Luftwaffe 1933–1945: A Reference Source, Volume 2
|location=London
|publisher=]
|year=2007
|isbn=978-1-903223-87-1
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Foreman
|first=John
|year=2005
|title=RAF Fighter Command Victory Claims of World War Two: Part Two, 1 January 1941 – 30 June 1943
|publisher=Red Kite
|isbn=978-0-9538061-8-8
}}
* {{Cite book * {{Cite book
|last=Franks |last=Franks
Line 148: Line 214:
|year=1998 |year=1998
|title=Royal Air Force Fighter Command Losses of the Second World War Volume 2, Operational Losses: Aircraft and Crews, 1942–1943 |title=Royal Air Force Fighter Command Losses of the Second World War Volume 2, Operational Losses: Aircraft and Crews, 1942–1943
|location=Leicester |location=Leicester
|publisher=Midland |publisher=Midland
|isbn=978-1-85780-075-3 |isbn=978-1-85780-075-3
}} }}
* {{cite book
|last=Garrett
|first=Richard
|year=1978
|title=Scharnhorst and Gneisenau: The Elusive Sisters
|location=New York
|publisher=Hippocrene Books
|isbn=978-0-7153-7628-7
}}
* {{cite book
|last=Goulter
|first=Christina J. M.
|author-link=Christina Goulter
|title=A Forgotten Offensive: Royal Air Force Coastal Command's Anti-shipping Campaign, 1940–1945
|year=1995
|publisher=Frank Cass
|location=London
|isbn=978-0-7146-4147-8
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Hooton
|first=E.R.
|year=1994
|title=Phoenix Triumphant: The Rise and Rise of the Luftwaffe
|location=London
|publisher=Arms & Armour Press
|isbn=978-1-85409-181-9
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Hooton
|first=E.R.
|year=2010
|title=The Luftwaffe: A Study in Air Power, 1933–1945
|location=London
|publisher=Classic Publications
|isbn=978-1-906537-18-0
}}
* {{cite book
|last=Jackson
|first=Robert
|year=2002
|title=The Bismarck
|publisher=Weapons of War
|location=London
|isbn=978-1-86227-173-9
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Kaplan
|first=Philip
|year=2007
|title=Fighter Aces of the Luftwaffe in World War WWII
|location=Auldgirth, Dumfriesshire, UK
|publisher=Pen & Sword Aviation
|isbn=978-1-84415-460-9
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Treadwell
|first=Terry C.
|year=2003
|title=Messerschmitt Bf 110
|series=Classic World War II Aviation
|location=Bristol, Avon, UK
|publisher=Cerberus Publishing Ltd.
|isbn=978-1-84145-107-7
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Weal
|first=John
|year=1996
|title=Focke-Wulf Fw 190 Aces of the Western Front
|location=Oxford, UK
|publisher=]
|isbn=978-1-85532-595-1
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Winton
|first=John
|title=Death of the Scharnhorst
|publisher=Cassel
|year=2003
|isbn=978-0-304-35697-3
}}
{{Refend}}

===Further reading===
{{Refbegin}}
* Caldwell, Donald L. (1994). ''JG 26 Photographic History of the Luftwaffe's Top Gun''. Motorbooks International Publishers & Wholesalers. {{ISBN|0-87938-845-5}}.
* Caldwell, Donald; Muller Richard (2007). ''The Luftwaffe Over Germany: Defense of the Reich''. Greenhill books. {{ISBN|978-1-85367-712-0}}.
* ]. ''The Birds and the Fishes: The Story of Coastal Command''. Hutchinson. 1960. (No ISBN)
* Galland, Adolf. ''The First and the Last: Germany's Fighter Force in WWII'' (Fortunes of War). South Miami, Florida: Cerberus Press, 2005. {{ISBN|1-84145-020-0}} * Galland, Adolf. ''The First and the Last: Germany's Fighter Force in WWII'' (Fortunes of War). South Miami, Florida: Cerberus Press, 2005. {{ISBN|1-84145-020-0}}
* Garret, Richard. ''Scharnhorst and Gneisenau: The Elusive Sisters''. Hippocrene Books. 1978. {{ISBN|0-7153-7628-4}}
* ]. ''A Forgotten Offensive: Royal Air Force Coastal Command's Anti-Shipping Campaign, 1940–1945''. Frank & Cass. London. 2005. {{ISBN|0-7146-4147-2}}.
* Nauroth, Holger and Held, Werner. ''The defence of the Reich: Hitler's nightfighter planes and pilots''. Arms and Armour. London. 1982. {{ISBN|978-0-85368-414-5}} * Nauroth, Holger and Held, Werner. ''The defence of the Reich: Hitler's nightfighter planes and pilots''. Arms and Armour. London. 1982. {{ISBN|978-0-85368-414-5}}
* ]. ''Phoenix Triumphant: The Rise and Rise of the Luftwaffe''. Arms & Armour Press. 1994. {{ISBN|1-86019-964-X}}
* ]. ''The Luftwaffe: A Study in Air Power, 1933–1945''. Classic Publications, London. 2010. {{ISBN|978-1-906537-18-0}}
* Jackson, Robert. ''The Bismarck. London: Weapons of War''. Weapons of War. 2002. {{ISBN|1-86227-173-9}}.
* Treadwell, Terry C. ''Messerschmitt Bf 110''. (Classic World War II Aviation). Bristol, Avon, UK: Cerberus Publishing Ltd., 2005. {{ISBN|1-84145-107-X}}.
* Weal, John. ''Focke-Wulf Fw 190 Aces of the Western Front''. Oxford: Osprey, 1996. {{ISBN|1-85532-595-0}}.
* Winton, John. ''Death of the Scharnhorst''. Cassel. 2003. {{ISBN|0-304-35697-2}}
{{Refend}} {{Refend}}



Latest revision as of 17:58, 23 December 2024

1942 German military operation

This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (November 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Operation Donnerkeil
Part of the Western Front of World War II

Satellite view of the English Channel
Date11–12 February 1942
LocationEnglish Channel, North Sea and northern Germany50°N 02°W / 50°N 2°W / 50; -2
Result German victory
Belligerents
 United Kingdom
 Canada
 Germany
Commanders and leaders
United Kingdom Sholto Douglas
United Kingdom Philip de la Ferté
United Kingdom Trafford Leigh-Mallory
Nazi Germany Adolf Galland
Nazi Germany Max Ibel
Strength
~450 aircraft 252 Bf 109 and Fw 190 fighters
30 Bf 110 Heavy fighters
32 Dornier Do 217s
Casualties and losses
41 aircraft 17 fighters
5 bombers
23 airmen killed
Western Front of
World War II
Phoney War

Luxembourg

The Netherlands

Belgium

France

Britain

1941–1943

1944–1945

Germany

Strategic campaigns

Unternehmen Donnerkeil (Operation Thunderbolt) was the codename for a German military operation of the Second World War. Donnerkeil was an air superiority operation in support of Operation Cerberus, also known as the Channel Dash by the Kriegsmarine (German Navy).

In 1941 Kriegsmarine surface vessels had carried out commerce raiding in support of the German U-boats in the Battle of the Atlantic. In January 1941 Operation Berlin was launched followed by Operation Rheinübung in May 1941. The dominance of the Royal Navy's surface fleet prevented the German units returning to ports in the Baltic Sea or Germany. The surviving ships, the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau and the cruiser Prinz Eugen, docked in the port of Brest, France. Throughout 1941 RAF Bomber Command attacked the ships in dock. The proximity of the ports to Royal Air Force (RAF) airfields allowed a large number of sorties to be flown against the targets in quick succession. Oberkommando der Marine (the Naval High Command), and Adolf Hitler desired to move the ships out of range of potential air raids.

In December 1941, Oberkommando der Luftwaffe (High Command of the Air Force) was ordered to plan an operation to protect the three German capital ships to escape from Brest to Germany through the English Channel. General der Jagdflieger (General of the Fighter Force) Adolf Galland prepared the aircraft for the operation. Cerberus and its supporting operation, Donnerkeil, began on 11 February 1942. During the first phase of the operation the Germans achieved surprise. The German ships reached Germany on 13 February 1942, two days after the start of Cerberus and Donnerkeil.

During the Channel Dash the Luftwaffe defeated British air attacks on the German ships, allowing them to reach German waters. In the air battles that took place over the Channel the British suffered many losses for no return; German losses were modest and the operation achieved its objective.

Background

The first German Capital ships to dock at Brest were Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, on 22 March 1941. In the previous eight weeks they had participated in the German Operation Berlin against Allied shipping in the Atlantic Ocean. The heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen also sought refuge in the harbour on 1 June 1941, after the failed Operation Rheinübung (Operation Rhine Exercise). Whilst in port, the ships were in easy range of British air power and suffered frequent attacks and some damage. A ten-month offensive by the RAF from 29 March 1941 comprised 2,928 sorties against the Brest harbour and 171 in daylight. A raid on 24 July lost 12 percent of its strength. Night bombing was safer as the Germans lacked night-fighters and the 18 losses to enemy action were claimed by anti-aircraft guns. During their campaign the RAF used more sophisticated navigation aids; on the night of the 7/8 December 1941 the Oboe navigation aid was employed for the first time.

Concerned after the loss of Bismarck, Adolf Hitler ordered the Kriegsmarine to move the ships to Germany for overhauls in preparation for their deployment to Norway. There they were to serve as a fleet in being and as the premier naval defense for German-occupied Norway. After lengthy discussions the Oberkommando der Marine opted for the shorter but arguably more dangerous route, through the English Channel.

On 12 January 1942 Hitler met with the commanders of the operation at his Headquarters in East Prussia (the Wolf's Lair). Present were Wilhelm Keitel, Commander-in-Chief of the Wehrmacht (German Armed Forces), Hans Jeschonnek (Chief of the Luftwaffe General Staff), Alfred Jodl (Chief of Staff for Military Operations) and Adolf Galland, General der Jagdflieger (General of the Fighter Forces), Erich Raeder (Commander-in-Chief of the Navy) and Vice-Admiral Otto Ciliax, who was to lead the battle group (Kampfgruppe). During the course of the meeting Hitler likened the German fleet to "a patient with cancer which is doomed unless they submit to an operation. An operation, on the other hand, even though it may have to be drastic, will at least offer some hope that the patient's life may yet be saved. The passage of our ships is such an operation. It must be attempted". Not much operational detail was discussed. The Luftwaffe was ordered to provide air cover and diversion raids against British targets. Jeschonnek promised around 250 aircraft.

Preparations

Luftwaffe plan

Adolf Galland, the planner of Donnerkeil

OKL was not happy about Cerberus; Jeschonnek remarked to Galland that if Cerberus failed then the Luftwaffe would be made a scapegoat. Jeschnonnek was to be proved right. During the 12 January 1942 meeting, the Navy demanded maximum fighter cover and won Hitler's support. During the meeting Jeschonnek stood his ground against Galland and refused to guarantee reinforcements to the Western fighter forces from other theatres. Galland was given executive power for the air operation which was given the code name Unternehmen Donnerkeil (Operation Thunderbolt). The existence of the operation was so secret that both Jeschonnek and Galland had to sign secrecy pledges as they left Hitler's Headquarters in East Prussia.

The details of the plan were worked out with Oberst (Colonel) Karl Koller, the chief of staff of Luftflotte 3 (Air Fleet 3, Generalfeldmarschall Hugo Sperrle). To assemble sufficient strength some training units had to be mobilized (the bulk of the Jagdwaffe was in the Soviet Union owing to Operation Barbarossa).

The route was divided into three sectors based upon the Jafü (Fighter Sector) boundaries but to ensure local control Max Ibel, former Geschwaderkommodore (Wing Commander) of Jagdgeschwader 27 (Fighter Wing 27) was appointed Jagdfliegerführer Schiff, shortened to Jafü Schiff (Fighter Controller Ship) and embarked on Scharnhorst as a signals officer to communicate with Luftwaffe units during the operation. Eight dummy operations, involving around 450 sorties, were made from 22 January to 10 February to train for the mission. It is unclear whether the British were aware of these training missions.

To disrupt British radio transmissions, the Funkhorchdienst (Radio Monitoring Service, Signals intelligence, commanded by Wolfgang Martini) attempted to jam radio-telephone frequencies. They created a subtle jamming technique which increased atmospheric interference which degraded the performance of British coastal radars. Dornier Do 217s of Kampfgeschwader 2 (Bomber Wing 2) was ordered to fly electronic deception missions over the western channel to divert enemy aircraft. Fliegerkorps IX ( Joachim Coeler) prepared to strike at RAF bases in south-western England and to engage and slow down British naval forces that might attempt an interception. Fernaufklärungsgruppe 123 (strategic or long-range reconnaissance) was responsible for maintaining reconnaissance in the east and west ends of the Channel and was to support Fliegerkorps IX.

To ensure constant air support, Jagdgeschwader (Fighter Wings) and Nachtjagdgeschwader 1 (Night Fighter Wing 1) were ordered to achieve a frantic pace in servicing and preparing aircraft for their next mission. To keep a constant aerial vigil over the task force, the 'black men' (mechanics) had to rearm and refuel aircraft in 30 minutes or less. Galland insisted that the aircraft should be split between high and low altitude to provide sound cover. The low altitude groups would be able to evade detection by British coastal radar. Galland demanded an umbrella of at least 16 fighters over the ships at any one time along the whole length of the channel. The fighters would be split into formations of eight aircraft for their respective patrol altitudes. Each formation was split into two Schwärme of four aircraft. The Schwärme tactics involved one formation flying to sea and one to land in a zigzag pattern. All Schwärme were ordered to fly back and forth along the line of ships in wide figures of eight while maintaining radio silence. Every sortie was meticulously timed to allow the fighters 30 minutes over the ships, enough to maintain cover and allow the relieved units to refuel, rearm and return to start the cycle again. However, during Donnerkeil, the relieving sortie arrived after only 20 minutes which increased the fighter cover to 32 fighters for half of the operation.

Galland made it clear to fighter pilots the ships must be protected at all costs. They were expected to fly at least four sorties on the day of the operation. Success would not be measured by numbers of enemy aircraft shot down. RAF aircraft leaving the target area were to be avoided but attacking aircraft were to be engaged at all costs – if necessary, through ramming.

British preparations

Operation Fuller was the code-name for the RAF plan against a German breakout. The RAF predicted the Germans might opt for the English Channel as their route. Captain Norman Dening, head of the Admiralty Operational Intelligence Centre was not certain that the Germans would attempt it, though he regarded as a possibility. At the end of January he had warned that the German warships were preparing to put to sea and a major operation should be expected. Dening sent a message to First Sea Lord Dudley Pound:

The short cut of the German ships is via the English Channel. It is 240 miles from Brest to Cherbourg and another 120 miles from Cherbourg to the Dover straits. While ships could make the passage from Brest to Cherbourg or from Cherbourg to the Dover straits in the same dark period, they could not make the complete passage from Brest to Dover in one dark period. At first sight this passage from up the Channel seems hazardous for the Germans. It is probable, however, that as their heavy ships are not fully efficient, they would prefer such a passage, relying for their security on the destroyers and aircraft which are efficient, and knowing full well that we have no heavy ships to oppose them in the Channel.... Taking all factors into consideration, it appears that the Germans can pass east up the Channel with much less risk than they will incur if they attempt an ocean passage.

Air Marshal Philip Joubert de la Ferté, commander-in-chief of RAF Coastal Command agreed this was the probable route. He expected the Germans to make an attempt any time after 10 February. Unfortunately for the British, the Air Ministry and the three RAF commands, RAF Coastal Command, RAF Bomber Command and RAF Fighter Command, believed the Germans would use the darkness for the longest and most dangerous part of the journey through the straits and would leave in daylight. The far from adequate forces at their disposal, they believed, would be best used at night. Most of RAF Bomber Command was ordered to stand down accordingly. Such an order made it unready to operate in daylight on 12 February.

Coastal Command had agreed to provide three squadrons of Bristol Beaufort torpedo bombers. The Fleet Air Arm (FAA) contributed one squadron of Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers. RAF Bomber Command had some 300 bombers on standby for an operation. The Swordfish were very slow and escorting them was difficult. The Beaufort squadrons were spread out and it was difficult to bring them together. One squadron was based at Leuchars, Scotland, one at Thorney Island, Portsmouth and one near St Eval, Cornwall.

Forces involved

Luftwaffe

The Luftwaffe contributed five wings to the operation. Jagdgeschwader 1 (Fighter Wing 1 or JG 1), Jagdgeschwader 2 (JG 2), Jagdgeschwader 26 (JG 26) equipped with day fighters, mostly the Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Focke-Wulf Fw 190. JG 2 and JG 26 operated the FW 190, while JG 1 operated the Bf 109. Nachtjagdgeschwader 1 was also pressed into service. Its Messerschmitt Bf 110s operated in much smaller numbers. Kampfgeschwader 2 operated in a support role, mainly maritime interdiction and air raids on enemy airfields in southern England, to distract the RAF from the Channel. The Germans had 252 fighters, 30 heavy fighters and 32 bombers. JG 1 and JG 2 operated the Bf 109, while JG 26 maintained a "monopoly" on the FW 190.

RAF and FAA

Confidence in the British bomber force was low. Having had no anti-shipping attack training, their ability to inflict damage to the ships was poor. The main hope was placed in the torpedo bomber force made up mainly of the Beaufort and Swordfish aircraft of Coastal Command and the Fleet Air Arm. Beauforts of No. 42 Squadron RAF, No. 86 Squadron RAF and No. 217 Squadron RAF were made available from Coastal Command for the mission but were short of torpedoes. The three torpedo squadrons were the only ones available on 12 February 1942; about 57 Beauforts had been diverted to other theatres, leaving a chronic shortage of torpedo bombers in Britain at a time when a major enemy naval operation was expected. No. 415 and No. 489 Squadron RAF had been withdrawn to convert to Handley Page Hampdens. No. 22 Squadron RAF was in the midst of a transfer to the Middle East.

No. 825 Squadron FAA and their Fairey Swordfish were also made available. Lockheed Hudsons of No. 224 Squadron RAF and No. 233 Squadron RAF were also committed for reconnaissance operations. No. 22 Squadron RAF was recalled from leave to take part in an operation over the Channel. Hudsons from No. 407 Squadron RCAF were also available, were placed on high alert and took part in the fighting. RAF Bomber Command contributed No. 5 Group RAF, containing some 242 of the 300 aircraft available to the service. Fighter Command committed No. 1, 19, 91, 41, 118, 129, 137, 234, 401, 403, 607, 316, 411, 452, 485, 137, 128, 64, 65, 72, and 11 squadrons.

Channel Dash

Contact

Fairey Swordfish. All that were sent on the mission were shot down.

During the evening of the 10 February 1942 the German flotilla prepared to undertake their operation. As they slipped anchor RAF bombers appeared overhead. The German ships conducted a U-turn and sped back to the dock. The RAF bombers released their bombs but did little damage. Fortunately for the German ships the British did not notice anything untoward.

Ultra intercepts had put the British on alert. Mistakes and bad luck enabled the Germans to evade detection. Three Hudsons of Coastal Command conducted a patrol at three positions. The first, named "Stopper", maintained surveillance between sunset and first light off the port of Brest. The Second, "Line SE" watched due north of the port and the third, "Habo", covered the area between Le Havre and Boulogne. The patrols lasted between 01:00 hours to dawn on 11 February. At 19:25 on 11 February, "Stopper" took off as usual but was intercepted by a Bf 110 night fighter of NJG 1. The Hudson evaded the Bf 110 but its ASV radar equipment was unserviceable. The aircraft headed back to St. Eval, landing at 20:40. Its replacement headed over the same area, reaching the location at 22:38. During the interlude, Ciliax and his ships had slipped their moorings. The "Line SE" Hudson should have picked up the German fleet but its ASV failed at 20:55. At 21:50 attempts to repair it failed and the Hudson returned to base. No replacement took its place. Everything now depended on "Habo" but Ciliax's luck held. At dawn, mist began to form over the airfield at Thorney Island. The mist was threatening to deny a clear landing run for the Hudson, so it was recalled an hour early, just as the German ships were approaching "Habo". II./NJG 1 flew 19 sorties, protecting the ships during the night, until replaced by JG 2 at 08:00.

For 11 hours the German fleet sailed from Brest towards the Dover Straits. By chance, a mechanic on the radar station at Fairlight, East Sussex had just finished repairing the equipment when he picked up 27 echoes at 10:15 on 12 February, south of Cap Gris Nez. The information was relayed to Ramsay, who ordered his Air Officer liaison to contact No. 11 Group RAF to ask for armed reconnaissance. Ramsay also warned No. 16 Group RAF and the FAA squadron from RAF Manston that possible targets were in the Channel, though he did not know the exact number or size of the enemy vessels. The performance of the radar was suppressed because of jamming measures (Ballstöranlage) undertaken by two Heinkel He 111s which had been flying off the south coast from their airfield near Paris. The flights ceased at 09:00 when installations along the French coast had taken over. The detection by Fairlight was a piece of good fortune, the Germans had assumed it to be out of action. Ten Do 217s from III./KG 2 flew missions against Plymouth harbour and airfield, while 15 flew diversions to keep RAF fighters clear of the He 111s.

Ramsay's request arrived at RAF Kenley. Two experienced pilots, Group Captain Victor Beamish (10 victories) and Wing Commander Finlay Boyd (14 victories), were sent on patrol to investigate. Flying over the channel in Spitfires, they ran into large numbers of Bf 109s protecting a large fleet of warships and dived away. Holding radio silence they kept their discovery until they landed. They sighted the ships at 10:42 and landed at 11:09. It was another 16 minutes before Bomber Command was alerted and Ramsay did not know of the situation until 11:30. At around 12:16 GMT, the first naval actions began between escorting Schnellboots and British Motor Torpedo Boats (MTBs) and the British commands were finally alerted. Galland ordered all low flying to cease and allowed Max Ibel and his team aboard Scharnhorst to break radio silence. Ibel then began directing Fw 190 and Bf 109s towards RAF units heading to the area. As the first outnumbered British units arrived over the ships, the German vessels were now at their closest point to German airfields. It allowed the Luftwaffe to offer maximum protection.

Main assaults

Fw 190 of JG 26, 1942.

Lieutenant Commander Eugene Esmonde, acting as Squadron Leader, No. 825 Squadron FAA, took off with his Swordfish formation at 12:25 to attack the ships. No. 411 and 64 Squadrons were to escort the FAA but arrived over Manston 15 minutes late and missed the rendezvous. The only unit to keep to mission orders was No. 72 Squadron (Squadron Leader Brian Kingcome). Unaware of the Swordfish squadron's location, they ran into each other by accident. Owing to low cloud, they dropped to between 50 and 100 feet. The German fighter cover put an end to the protection the Spitfire's could provide as the RAF fighters now had to look after themselves. The Spitfires and Swordfish were engaged by Fw 190s of 8. Staffel and 9. Staffel of JG 26 led by Gruppenkommandeur (Group Commander) Gerhard Schöpfel of III./JG 26. The Fw 190s were just relieving fighters of JG 2. Frail and slow, the Swordfish forced German pilots to lower their undercarriages to prevent overshooting the biplanes. In the event all six Swordfish were shot down. The Spitfires destroyed three Fw 190s in return. Several Swordfish managed to drop torpedoes but none found their mark. Esmonde was shot down and killed by a FW 190. He was awarded the Victoria Cross. Only five of the original eighteen Swordfish crew survived. No. 41 Squadron RAF claimed three Bf 109s (most likely from JG 1) destroyed and one damaged off the Belgian coast. No. 72 Squadron claimed three Fw 190s destroyed and four damaged in the battles around 13:00. No. 410 Squadron claimed two Bf 109s destroyed and two damaged in the same dogfights. The German ships consumed very little ammunition, as the action had been carried out largely by the Luftwaffe.

The stand down order had meant RAF Bomber Command's contribution to the proceedings came relatively late in the day. It dispatched 73 bombers from 13:55 to 14:50 GMT. None of the attackers hit their targets. At 14:35 nine Beauforts from No. 42 Squadron led by W.H Cliff took off. Arriving over Manston at 14:50 they found other aircraft from No. 407 Squadron RCAF orbiting. It took nearly 30 minutes to form a proper formation. With several other squadrons they attacked the Gneisenau and Prinz Eugen at heights of between 60 and 100 feet but their torpedoes missed. No losses were suffered by No. 42 Squadron. The Hudsons struck at between 400 and 900 feet. Two RCAF bombers were lost without success. No. 217 Squadron nearly achieved a hit on Gneisenau but the ship turned away, just avoiding the salvo. Later, a wave of 134 to 137 bombers intercepted the ships between 16:00 and 17:05. Only 20 crews managed to attack owing to poor training (Bomber Command crews were not trained for naval targets), a low cloud base and poor visibility . Nine bombers were lost. Another formation of 35 Vickers Wellington aircraft attempted a strike between 17:50 and 18:15, losing two of their number. The most notable raid in this action was by six Beauforts from No. 86, three from No. 217 and three from No. 22 Squadron. Wing Commander C. Flood, No. 86 Squadron led the attack in the only ASV-equipped aircraft. Locating the German ships in the darkness they attacked but anti-aircraft fire scattered the bombers and no successes were achieved. Of the 242 bombers that took part in the missions, it is likely only 39 conducted attacks, with a possible that a 16, suggesting a total of 54 aircraft released bombs against the ships, of which 15 were shot down. RAF Fighter Command also threw in fighter-bombers to try and inflict damage, operating Hawker Hurricanes over the Dover area.

The British managed to damage both the Gneisenau and Scharnhorst (the latter seriously). Scharnhorst hit two mines, one at 14:31 GMT and a further one at 21:34 GMT. Gneisenau also struck a mine at 18:55 GMT. Both ships recovered and steamed on. Scharnhorst had been stopped dead in the water with engine damage after the first hit. The failure to alert Bomber Command earlier meant a chance was missed to deliver an attack on Scharnhorst when it was most vulnerable. The second and third mine hits came after nightfall, which enabled both vessels to avoid further attacks. The last RAF sighting of the ships had occurred at 18:00 GMT. It is unclear who was responsible for the damage on the German ships. It is possible that the mines were dropped by Hampden bombers. Should this be the case, the bombers achieved far more damage than the Royal Navy and the rest of the RAF combined.

Losses and overclaiming

In protecting the RAF bombers, Fighter Command lost 20 fighters, 14 pilots killed and three captured. Only eight of the RAF fighters were shot down by the Luftwaffe. A further eight were shot down by anti-aircraft fire, two collided and two were lost to unknown causes. Ten of the fighters were Spitfires, six were Hawker Hurricanes and four were Westland Whirlwinds. During the air battles, mutual overclaiming took place, though the Luftwaffe was significantly worse. RAF Fighters claimed 16 Bf 109s destroyed and 13 damaged. Four Fw 190s were also claimed destroyed and six damaged. German losses were 17 fighters, along with five Do 217s. Human casualties amounted to 23 killed. German fighter units claimed 60 RAF aircraft shot down, with JG 26 awarded seven kills and six probables. British losses were 41, a number of which were lost to anti-aircraft fire. The bomber unit III./KG 2 had participated in raids against RAF airfields. The Luftwaffe had flown 300 fighter and 40 bomber missions during 11–12 February.

Attacks in port

The German flotilla had reached home ports on the evening of 12 February. The threat from RAF bombers in daylight had gone but Bomber Command was soon making night attacks on Kiel harbour. Gneisenau was moved into an inner basin alongside her depot ship, Monte Olivia. The hatches were left open and her tanks, still containing a large amount of fuel, were left unattended. RAF Bomber Command made its first attack on the night of 25/26 February, when 61 bombers flew over Kiel. Monte Olivia was destroyed but Gneisenau escaped. On 26/27 February another 61 RAF bombers returned. A bomb penetrated Gneisenau's foredeck and exploded. The oil fumes from the tanks ignited and the ship was engulfed in fire from her bow to turret Anton. The forward part of the bow needed to be replaced. She steamed to Gdynia, in Poland on 4 April where she was decommissioned out of range of RAF bombers. Gneisenau did not put to sea again. The raid cost three aircraft, one Hampden and two Wellingtons. German casualties amounted to 16 civilians and 116 sailors dead.

On 27/28 February 1942 33 bombers flew over Wilhelmshaven looking for Scharnhorst. Cloud obscured the area and German reports noted only three explosions. Three Armstrong Whitworth Whitley bombers were lost to unstated causes. In 1942 Scharnhorst had evaded the worst attacks from RAF Bomber Command. It was ready for redeployment by the summer but accidents, such as striking a mine and running aground meant this was delayed until the turn of the year. It took three attempts to sail to Norway; on 10 January 1943 she was spotted by RAF aircraft and turned back after reaching the Skagerrak. Another attempt was in January failed. On 3 March 1943 Scharnhorst finally made it to Norway. She would survive another eight months before being sent on her last wartime mission, Operation Ostfront. During her sortie Scharnhorst was sunk at the Battle of the North Cape.

Aftermath

British failures

The failure to coordinate the FAA, RAF and Navy dispersed any counterstrike. Confusion owing to the weather and the lack of central control of British sea and air forces caused each element to work independently. Several friendly fire incidents occurred, such as the attack by No. 217 Squadron on HMS Mackay. The most serious failure was Fighter Command's failure to protect bomber and naval forces. Although the weather also prevented greater German fighter activity by the time the target area was reached, valuable time had been lost by bomber formations searching for their fighter escorts over the rendezvouses which either never arrived or were given incorrect orders or direction too late to be acted upon. Little communication was enabled between fighter and bomber units but also between the strike units. Compounding the problems, RAF Bomber Command's crews, which made up the majority of the attacking aircraft, were not trained for attacks against naval targets. The only anti-shipping torpedo-bomber squadrons were No. 42 and 217 Squadrons of Coastal Command, which owing to supply difficulties, were five torpedoes short.

Joubert de la Ferté blamed the failure of Operation Fuller on the neglect of anti-shipping aviation, not to those directing the forces during the operation or intelligence services. Joubert called for all anti-shipping units to be handed over to the service. Better training, more aircraft and a higher quality of equipment would allow the RAF to avoid a repeat of the Channel Dash. The Air Ministry refused his request and instead put No. 2 Group RAF Bomber Command in support of Coastal units against enemy shipping between Cherbourg and Wilhelmshaven. Production and procurement remained in favour of Bomber Command, producing types for the strategic bombing campaign over Germany, even after the failure of Fuller. Adding to RAF difficulties, most of Coastal Command's anti-shipping units were transferred to the Mediterranean Theatre of Operations (MTO), leaving Coastal Command short of naval strike aircraft in 1942. Air Marshal Charles Portal agreed this needed to change arguing, "We agree on the importance of torpedo bomber aircraft, and this was proved completely during the passage of the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau up the channel". In May 1942 Joubert succeeded in procuring the new Bristol Beaufighter, which entered service in November 1942 but only one squadron was made operational. Despite the need for anti-shipping strike aircraft, the service continued to struggle until 1943, when Portal fulfilled his promise and more of these aircraft, including the de Havilland Mosquito, became available.

Donnerkeil was a watershed in electronic warfare, by jamming, Martini removed British inhibitions concerning the use of ECM against the Kammhuber line on the Continent and paved the way for the debut of Window (Chaff) in June 1943, which had a devastating effect on the ability of German night-fighter radar defences to locate and intercept RAF bombers during the Defence of the Reich. The first step in this campaign was a British Army operation, Operation Biting, to steal a Würzburg radar set on 27/28 February 1942. The British removed components and developed counter-measures. The Germans responded by fortifying all radar sets, which only made them more visible to RAF reconnaissance. The British also began the occasional jamming of Freya radar sets. The Germans did not realise this was happening until September 1942. German forces also jammed British radar, to enable fighter-bomber operations over England. The British described them as a "real menace". Radar-jamming, counter-measures and other innovations escalated from that point onward.

German perspective

Donnerkeil had been an outstanding success for the Luftwaffe. The measure of success lay not in the ratio of losses, which amounted to 2:1 in the German favour but the failure of the RAF, FAA and Royal Navy to intercept or at least inflict severe damage to the German warships. The meagre forces committed by the Navy had been repulsed easily by the German warships and their escorts. Anti-aircraft fire had offered a helpful defence against air attack but the German aircraft had succeeded, along with poor weather, in breaking up RAF attacks on the ships. Galland, responsible for the plan, called it the high point of his career.

For the Kriegsmarine, Cerberus had been operational success and a strategic reverse. The situation had forced them into a strategic withdrawal from the Atlantic. From that point onwards, the German campaign in the Atlantic was to be carried by the U-boats, unsupported by a surface fleet. With the German ships removed from the French Atlantic ports, the British fleets could contain them much more effectively in Norway and the North Sea. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau had been damaged by mines and required extensive repairs. Prinz Eugen was torpedoed and her stern collapsed just weeks after Cerberus. All three ships were out of action for extended periods. More bad luck followed, with Gneisenau being knocked out for good in February 1942 and the sinking of the Scharnhorst in December 1943. None of the ships sailed in the Atlantic again, leaving the Battle of the Atlantic to be carried on by U-boat forces.

References

Citations

  1. ^ Caldwell 1996, p. 204.
  2. ^ Weal 1996, p. 15.
  3. ^ Hooton 1994, p. 116.
  4. ^ Hooton 1994, p. 114.
  5. ^ Baker 1996, p. 190.
  6. ^ Garrett 1978, p. 89.
  7. Blair 1996, pp. 482–483, 487.
  8. Hooton 2010, p. 121.
  9. ^ Hooton 1994, p. 115.
  10. ^ Weal 1996, p. 16.
  11. Byford 2011, p. 43.
  12. ^ Garrett 1978, p. 93.
  13. de Zeng, Stanket & Creek 2007, p. 33.
  14. Caygill 2002, p. 41.
  15. ^ Goulter 1995, p. 164.
  16. Buckley 1995, p. 198.
  17. ^ Ashworth 1992, pp. 52–55.
  18. Franks 1998, pp. 12–14.
  19. Hawes, Richard, Worth, Richard and Elrod, John. "Operation Cerberus/Operation Fuller, The Channel Dash, 11–13 February 1942." Channel Dash. Retrieved: 12 September 2010.
  20. ^ Garrett 1978, pp. 102–103.
  21. Treadwell 2003, pp. 92–93.
  22. Hooton 2010, p. 122.
  23. Garrett 1978, pp. 99–100.
  24. Kaplan 2007, p. 34.
  25. ^ Weal 1996, p. 17.
  26. Foreman 2005, pp. 127–128.
  27. Caldwell 1996, p. 207.
  28. Jackson 2002, pp. 56–57.
  29. Garrett 1978, p. 104.
  30. Baker 1996, p. 189.
  31. Garrett 1978, p. 107.
  32. Goulter 1995, p. 163.
  33. Garrett 1978, p. 95.
  34. Garrett 1978, p. 111.
  35. Garrett 1978, p. 119.
  36. Franks 1998, pp. 13–14.
  37. Foreman 2005, pp. 127–130.
  38. Weal 1996, p. 18.
  39. Garrett 1978, pp. 119–121.
  40. "RAF Campaign Diary, 26/27 February 1942." Archived 7 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine Ministry of Defence 2004. Retrieved: 20 September 2010.
  41. "RAF Campaign Diary, 27/28 February 1942." Archived 7 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine Ministry of Defence 2004. Retrieved: 20 September 2010.
  42. Garrett 1978, pp. 126–127.
  43. Garrett 1978, pp. 138–163.
  44. Winton 2003, pp. 130–160.
  45. Goulter 1995, p. 165.
  46. ^ Goulter 1995, pp. 166–167.
  47. Jackson 2002, p. 59.

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Caldwell, Donald L. (1994). JG 26 Photographic History of the Luftwaffe's Top Gun. Motorbooks International Publishers & Wholesalers. ISBN 0-87938-845-5.
  • Caldwell, Donald; Muller Richard (2007). The Luftwaffe Over Germany: Defense of the Reich. Greenhill books. ISBN 978-1-85367-712-0.
  • de la Ferté, Philiip Joubert. The Birds and the Fishes: The Story of Coastal Command. Hutchinson. 1960. (No ISBN)
  • Galland, Adolf. The First and the Last: Germany's Fighter Force in WWII (Fortunes of War). South Miami, Florida: Cerberus Press, 2005. ISBN 1-84145-020-0
  • Nauroth, Holger and Held, Werner. The defence of the Reich: Hitler's nightfighter planes and pilots. Arms and Armour. London. 1982. ISBN 978-0-85368-414-5

World War II
General
Topics
Theaters
Aftermath
War crimes
Participants
Allies
Axis
Neutral
Resistance
POWs
Timeline
Prelude
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
Categories: