| Revision as of 00:16, 27 February 2022 editAloha27 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,085 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Scorpio (astrology).Tag: Twinkle | Latest revision as of 20:56, 4 November 2022 edit undoJc3s5h (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,931 edits →November 2022: ANI | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid #FFFFFF">] ]</span> 00:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid #FFFFFF">] ]</span> 00:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| Ok, I study astrology and the reason Im editing it is that one planet rules just one sign, there is no such thing as co-ruling. And people editing here should know that before editing. ] (]) 11:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :] requires that sources be supported by ]. The problem is that astrology is a ], so sources that believe astrology is true are unreliable. Sources that describe the history of astrology, without expressing belief in it, could be acceptable. ] (]) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Really? == | |||
| Really? Who is expressing belief here? This what we learn, So you who hasn’t studied astrology and aren’t professional knows this better? According to you since it is a pseudoscience, people can put whatever info they want in there. Maybe you’re the one putting whatever you like without knowing the real thing. ] (]) 22:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==November 2022== | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| You are introducing changes that disagree with the cited source. Therefore you are making a false statement about what the reliable source says. ] (]) 16:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :are you serious? anyone can put whatever information they want in dictionary.com, are you 12 years old? Please Provide me with a reliable source for ex. an astrology book or sth official then I will stop editing, since you "know" astrology better than I do. You can block me for asking you to put accurate information, but I can report you for putting false, google based information in wikipedia. ] (]) 08:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 20:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:56, 4 November 2022
February 2022
Your recent editing history at Scorpio (astrology) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aloha27 talk 00:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Ok, I study astrology and the reason Im editing it is that one planet rules just one sign, there is no such thing as co-ruling. And people editing here should know that before editing. Goanoa (talk) 11:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- The English Misplaced Pages verifiability policy requires that sources be supported by reliable sources. The problem is that astrology is a pseudoscience, so sources that believe astrology is true are unreliable. Sources that describe the history of astrology, without expressing belief in it, could be acceptable. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Really?
Really? Who is expressing belief here? This what we learn, So you who hasn’t studied astrology and aren’t professional knows this better? According to you since it is a pseudoscience, people can put whatever info they want in there. Maybe you’re the one putting whatever you like without knowing the real thing. Goanoa (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
Your recent editing history at Aries (astrology) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are introducing changes that disagree with the cited source. Therefore you are making a false statement about what the reliable source says. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- are you serious? anyone can put whatever information they want in dictionary.com, are you 12 years old? Please Provide me with a reliable source for ex. an astrology book or sth official then I will stop editing, since you "know" astrology better than I do. You can block me for asking you to put accurate information, but I can report you for putting false, google based information in wikipedia. Goanoa (talk) 08:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Aries (astrology). Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)