Misplaced Pages

Lindbergh kidnapping: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:51, 12 February 2007 editAlextrevelian 006 (talk | contribs)1,228 edits Revert to revision 107223870 dated 2007-02-11 02:43:36 by Whojackie using popups← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:00, 11 January 2025 edit undo2607:fea8:1c5c:9b00:485c:2ded:fc1f:c5db (talk) In television 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Abduction and murder of Charles Lindbergh Jr. (1932)}}
]
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2018}}
{{Infobox civilian attack
| title = Lindbergh kidnapping
| image = lindbergh baby poster.jpg
| caption =
| date ={{start date and age|1932|03|01}}
| location = ], ], U.S.
| coordinates = {{Coord|40.4240|N|74.7677|W|region:US-NJ_type:landmark|display=title,inline}}
| type = ] by ], ]
| victim = Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr., aged 1{{Infobox event
| title = <br>
| child = yes
| burial = Ashes scattered in the Atlantic Ocean}}
| motive = Inconclusive; possibly ]
| convicted = ]
| charges =
| verdict = ]
| convictions =
*]
*]
*]{{Infobox event
| title = <br>
| child = yes
| sentence = ] by ]
| litigation = Two ]s filed by Hauptmann's wife against the state of New Jersey, arguing his innocence (''both dismissed'')
}}
}}On March 1, 1932, Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. (born June 22, 1930), the 20-month-old son of colonel ] and his wife, aviatrix and author ], was murdered after being abducted from his crib in the upper floor of the Lindberghs' home, ], in ], United States.<ref>{{Cite news |first=Barbara |last=Gill |title=Lindbergh kidnapping rocked the world 50 years ago |work=] |year=1981 |access-date=December 30, 2008 |quote=So while the world's attention was focused on Hopewell, from which the first press dispatches emanated about the kidnapping, the Democrat made sure its readers knew that the new home of Col. Charles A. Lindbergh and Anne Morrow Lindbergh was in East Amwell Township, Hunterdon County. |url=http://www.nj.com/lindbergh/hunterdon/index.ssf?/lindbergh/stories/demcovr.html |df=dmy-all |archive-date=March 3, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303212905/http://www.nj.com/lindbergh/hunterdon/index.ssf?%2Flindbergh%2Fstories%2Fdemcovr.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> On May 12, the child's corpse was discovered by a truck driver by the side of a nearby road.<ref name="Eaglet">{{Cite web |last=Aiuto |first=Russell |title=The Theft of the Eaglet |work=The Lindbergh Kidnapping |publisher=TruTv |url=http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/famous/lindbergh/index_1.html |access-date=June 24, 2009 |df=dmy-all |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121017090614/http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/famous/lindbergh/index_1.html |archive-date=October 17, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref name="Lindbergh web">{{Cite web |title=Lindbergh Kidnapping Index |url=http://www.charleslindbergh.com/kidnap/ |access-date=October 16, 2013 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


In September 1934, a German immigrant carpenter named ] was arrested for the crime. After a trial that lasted from January 2 to February 13, 1935, he was found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. Despite his conviction, he continued to profess his innocence, but all appeals failed and he was executed in the ] at the ] on April 3, 1936.<ref name="linder">{{Cite web |last=Linder |first=Douglas |title=The Trial of Richard "Bruno" Hauptmann: An Account |publisher=University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law |year=2005 |url=http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Hauptmann/AccountHauptmann.html |access-date=June 24, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090709013003/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Hauptmann/AccountHauptmann.html |archive-date=July 9, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Hauptmann's guilt or lack thereof continues to be debated in the modern day. Newspaper writer ] called the kidnapping and trial "the biggest story since the ]".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140308000607/http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/famous/lindbergh/trial_6.html |date=March 8, 2014 |df=dmy-all}}; CrimeLibrary.com; accessed August 2015</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Newton |first=Michael |title=The FBI Encyclopedia |year=2012 |publisher=McFarland |location=North Carolina, US |isbn=978-0-7864-6620-7 |page=197 |url=http://www.mcfarlandbooks.com/book-2.php?id=978-0-7864-6620-7 |df=dmy-all |access-date=August 9, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204202216/http://www.mcfarlandbooks.com/book-2.php?id=978-0-7864-6620-7 |archive-date=February 4, 2017 |url-status=dead }}</ref> American media called it the "]"; legal scholars have referred to the trial as one of the "]".<ref>{{Cite book |title=Crimes and Trials of the Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FPRslbPnMjwC |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year= 2007 |isbn=978-1-57356-973-6 |language=en |first1=Frankie Y. |last1=Bailey |first2=Steven |last2=Chermak |page=167 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> The crime spurred the ] to pass the ] (commonly referred to as the "Little Lindbergh Law"), which made transporting a kidnapping victim across state lines a ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Glass |first=Andrew |title=This Day on Capitol Hill: February 13 |publisher=The Politico | date = March 26, 2007 | url = http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0207/2725.html |access-date=June 24, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
The '''Lindbergh kidnapping''' was the ] and ] of '''Charles Lindbergh III''', the ] son of world famous ] ] and ], in ].


==Kidnapping==
The kidnapping and subsequent trial might be described as a ]: every development was followed by millions of people; newspaper writer ] called the affair "the biggest story since the ]."
At approximately 9 p.m. on March 1, 1932, the Lindberghs' nurse, Betty Gow, found that 20-month-old Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. was not with his mother, ], who had just come out of the bath. Gow then alerted ] who immediately went to the child's room, where he found a ransom note, containing poor handwriting and grammar, in an envelope on the windowsill. Taking a gun, Lindbergh went around the house and grounds with the family butler, Olly Whateley;<ref>{{cite book | title=Hauptmann's Ladder| author=Cahill, Richard T. Jr. | publisher=Kent State University| year=2014| pages=7–8}}</ref> they found impressions in the ground under the window of the baby's room, pieces of a wooden ladder, and a baby's blanket.<ref name=cahill>{{cite book | title=Hauptmann's Ladder | author=Cahill, Richard T. Jr. |pages=7–8 |publisher=Kent State University |year=2014}}</ref> Whateley telephoned the Hopewell police department while Lindbergh contacted his attorney and friend, ], and the New Jersey state police.<ref name=cahill/>


==Investigation==
] was convicted and executed for the crime, though he proclaimed his innocence. In the subsequent decades, many have argued that Hauptmann was innocent: the victim of a ] by authorities eager to resolve a highly public case. He undoubtedly possessed some of the ransom money, but beyond that, the questions of further involvement in the crime may remain open.


There is ample evidence that, at the very least, the ] was badly bungled. As ] writes, "From the very beginning, the investigation of the case was fragmented and mishandled, and it suffered from the triple liabilities of Lindbergh's fame, ego, and tendency to manage everything. Everyone that dealt with him was conscious that they were dealing with Colonel Lindbergh, and deferred to his opinions. Lindbergh, too, had a very high opinion of himself. He tended to give orders when it would have been more profitable to listen." In fairness, kidnappings of prominent persons were still fairly rare crimes at the time, and police forces had little experience with them.


Lindbergh authorized two separate intermediaries to contact the supposed kidnappers: one was a bombastic school teacher with ] delusions, the other a convicted ]. Ransom was paid to ''two'' different groups &ndash; and nearly paid to a third &ndash; but the child was never seen alive after the kidnapping. Even the identification of the corpse said to be the Lindbergh baby has been called into question. ], the ] of the child has never been ]&ndash;and, thus, the child may be classified as ].


An extensive search of the home and its surrounding area was conducted by police from nearby ] in coordination with the ].
The crime inspired the "]", which made ] a ], and also inspired the ] novel '']''.
]
After midnight, a fingerprint expert examined the ransom note and ladder; no usable fingerprints or footprints were found, leading experts to conclude that the kidnapper(s) wore gloves and had some type of cloth on the soles of their shoes.<ref>Lindbergh by A. Scott Berg</ref> No adult fingerprints were found in the baby's room, including in areas witnesses admitted to touching, such as the window, but the baby's fingerprints were found.


The brief, handwritten ransom note had many spelling and grammar irregularities:
==Background==
'''Charles Augustus Lindbergh, Jr.''' (], ]&ndash;March ]) was dubbed "The Eaglet" by the ]. His father's exploits in flying airplanes had earlier earned him immense popularity and acclaim, as well as the ] "The Lone Eagle".


{{blockquote
Lindbergh, Jr. (called "Little It" by his parents) was, beyond a slight deformity of some toes on his right foot, a healthy child. Later, the child became known as the "Lindbergh baby".
|text=<!-- Do not correct the misspellings in the note. They were in the original note -->
Dear Sir! Have 50.000$ {{sic|hide=y|re|dy}}<!--this is correct as to how the note was actually written: DO NOT CHANGE.--> 25 000$ in 20$ bills 15000$ in 10$ bills and 10000$ in 5$ bills After 2–4 days we will inform you {{sic|hide=y|we|re}} to deliver the {{sic|hide=y|mon|y}}. We warn you for making {{sic|hide=y|any|ding}} public or for notify the Police the child is in {{sic|hide=y|gut}} care. Indication for all letters are {{sic|hide=y|Sing|nature}} and 3 {{sic|hide=y|hoh|ls}}.<ref>{{cite book |title=Cemetery John: The Undiscovered Mastermind of the Lindbergh Kidnapping |author=Zorn, Robert |page=68 |publisher=The Overlook Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-1590208564 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
}}


At the bottom of the note were two interconnected blue circles surrounding a red circle, with a hole punched through the red circle and two more holes to the left and right.
To escape the media, the Lindberghs were building a 390 acre (1.6 km²) estate near ], where the family was spending weekends since the work was not complete. Though Hopewell was the nearest town, the estate was actually located in East Amwell Township (Hunterdon County), just north of Hopewell.
]
On further examination of the ransom note by professionals, they found that it was all written by the same person. They determined that due to the odd English, the writer must have been foreign and had spent some time in the United States but little. The FBI then found a sketch artist to make a portrait of the man that they believed to be the kidnapper.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Horan|first=James J.|date=1983-10-01|title=The Investigation of the Lindbergh Kidnapping Case|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/jfs11620j|journal=Journal of Forensic Sciences|volume=28|issue=4|pages=1040–1043|doi=10.1520/jfs11620j|issn=0022-1198}}</ref>


Another attempt at identifying the kidnapper was made by examining the ladder that was used in the crime to abduct the child. Police realized that while the ladder was built incorrectly, it was built by someone who knew how to construct with wood and had prior building experience. No fingerprints were found on the ladder. Slivers of the wood were examined, as the police believed that this evidence would lead to the kidnapper. They had a professional see how many different types of wood were used, what pattern was made by the nail holes and if it had been made indoors or outdoors. This was later a key element in the trial of the man who was accused of the kidnapping.
==The abduction==
Normally, the Lindberghs would have returned to ], where the young family had been staying with ]'s parents, for the week, but Charles, Jr. was recovering from a bad cold. His parents decided to remain at the house in ].


On March 2, 1932, ] Director ] contacted the Trenton New Jersey Police Department. He told the New Jersey police that they could contact the FBI for any resources and would provide any assistance if needed. The FBI did not have federal jurisdiction until May 13, 1932 when the President declared that the FBI was at the disposal of the New Jersey Police Department and that the FBI should coordinate and conduct the investigation.
On the evening of ], ] at about 8:00 p.m., the baby had been put to bed by his mother and ] Betty Gow. Gow stayed with the baby a few minutes longer until she was sure he was asleep. Mrs. Lindbergh looked in on the child at about 9:00 p.m. and found him sleeping quietly.


The New Jersey State police offered a $25,000 reward, {{Inflation|US|25000|1932|fmt=eq|r=-3}}, for anyone who could provide information pertaining to the case.
Gow checked on the baby a little before 10.00 p.m., and discovered he was not in his bed. She told Mrs. Lindbergh, and the two women initially suspected it was another joke by Mr. Lindbergh. He occasionally pulled ]s, and not long before, had secreted the child in a closet, claiming no awareness of his location while they searched the house. When quizzed as to the baby's whereabouts, however, Lindbergh grew alarmed and insisted it was no joke. He told a ], Ollie Whately, to telephone police (a call was placed at 10:25 p.m.) and then, carrying a ], Lindbergh searched the house and the grounds.


On March 4, 1932 a man by the name of ] had a discussion with ] and told her that he would be of great importance in retrieving the Lindbergh baby. Means told McLean that he could find these kidnappers because he was approached weeks before the abduction about participating in a "big kidnapping" and he claimed that his friend was the kidnapper of the Lindbergh child. The following day, Means told McLean that he had made contact with the person who had the Lindbergh child. He then convinced Mrs. McLean to give him $100,000 to obtain the child because the ransom money had doubled. McLean obliged, believing that Means really knew where the child was. She waited for the child's return every day until she finally asked Means for her money back. When he refused, Mrs. McLean reported him to the police and he was sentenced to fifteen years in prison on embezzlement charges.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Gardner|first=Lloyd|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/793996630|title=The case that never dies : the Lindbergh kidnapping|date=2004|publisher=Rutgers University Press|isbn=978-0-8135-6063-2|location=Piscataway|oclc=793996630}}</ref>
Outside, he found a shoddy, homemade wooden ladder on the ground below the second floor nursery window. Its top rung was broken.


Violet Sharpe,<ref group=lower-alpha>In some sources, spelled as Violet Sharp</ref> who was suspected as a conspirator, died by suicide on June 10,<ref>{{cite news|work=Buffalo Evening News|date=June 11, 1932|title=Fellow Servants Say Violet Hysterical Prior to Suicide|page=1|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/107201866/violet-sharpe/|via=newspapers.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|work=The Morning Call|location=Paterson, New Jersey|date=June 11, 1932|title=Waitress Under Constant Suspicion|page=2|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/107202951/waitress-under-constant-suspicion/|via=newspapers.com}}</ref> before she was scheduled to be questioned for the fourth time.<ref name="Lindbergh, Anne 1973">{{cite book |author=Lindbergh, Anne |title=Hour of Gold, Hour of Lead |url=https://archive.org/details/hourofgoldhourof0000lind |url-access=registration |location=San Diego, CA |publisher=Harcourt Brace Jovanovich |year=1973 |isbn=978-0151421763 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Her involvement was later ruled out due to her having an alibi for the night of March 1, 1932.
A letter was discovered on the nursery windowsill — presumably left there by the kidnapper(s) — but Lindbergh allowed no one to touch it until police arrived.


In October 1933, ] announced that the ] would take jurisdiction over the case.{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}
The first on the scene was Chief Harry Wolf of the Hopewell, New Jersey City police. Soon thereafter, however — and before Wolf could begin much of an investigation — many New Jersey State Police officers arrived, claiming control over the case. The State Police wandered around the Lindbergh home and grounds essentially at will, making no organized search and with no ranking officer clearly directing their actions. It is likely that the crime scene was contaminated by the New Jersey State police and that valuable physical evidence was compromised or destroyed. For example, there were reports of two sets of footprints on the ground near where the ladder had been leaned against the house. But the area was not secured, and many police walked in and out of the area before the footprints could be photographed or cast in plaster.


===Prominence===
The police searched the home and reported that they had scoured the surrounding grounds for miles without finding any evidence.
{{more citations needed|section|date=May 2020}}
]
Word of the kidnapping spread quickly. Hundreds of people converged on the estate, destroying any footprint evidence.<ref>{{cite book |title=Hauptmann's Ladder | author=Cahill, Richard T. Jr. |page=16 |publisher=Kent State University |year=2014 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Along with police, well-connected and well-intentioned people arrived at the Lindbergh estate. Military colonels offered their aid, although only one had law enforcement expertise{{snd}}], superintendent of the New Jersey State Police. The other colonels were Henry Skillman Breckinridge, a ] lawyer; and ], a hero of the ] who later headed the ] (OSS), the forerunner of the ]. Lindbergh and these men speculated that the kidnapping was perpetrated by organized crime figures. They thought that the letter was written by someone who spoke German as his native language. At this time, Charles Lindbergh used his influence to control the direction of the investigation.<ref>{{cite book |last=Fass |first=Paula S. |chapter =Chapter 3: "The nation's child ... is dead": The Lindbergh case |page=100 |title=Kidnapped: Child Abduction in America |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0195311419 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sgINgwBY7YMC&q=John+F+Condon+-++jafsie+-+actions&pg=PA124 |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


They contacted Mickey Rosner, a ] hanger-on rumored to know mobsters. Rosner turned to two ] owners, Salvatore "Salvy" Spitale and Irving Bitz, for aid. Lindbergh quickly endorsed the duo and appointed them his intermediaries to deal with the mob. Several organized crime figures – notably ], ], ], and ] – spoke from prison, offering to help return the baby in exchange for money or for legal favors. Specifically, Capone offered assistance in return for being released from prison under the pretense that his assistance would be more effective. This was quickly denied by the authorities.{{citation needed|date=November 2020}}
After midnight, a ] expert arrived at the home to examine the note left on the windowsill and the latter used. He found nothing of value. The ladder had 500 partial fingerprints and most unusable. The note was opened and read. The handwritten ransom note was riddled with spelling errors and grammatical irregularities:


]]]
:''Dear Sir! Have $50,000 redy $25,000 in $20 bills 15,000 in $10 bills and $10,000 in $5 bills. After 2-4 days we will inform you were to deliver the Money. We warn you for making anyding public or for notify the Police. The child is in gut care. Indication for all letters are singnature and three holes.''
The morning after the kidnapping, authorities notified President ] of the crime. At that time, kidnapping was classified as a state crime and the case did not seem to have any grounds for federal involvement. Attorney General ] met with Hoover and announced that the whole machinery of the Department of Justice would be set in motion to cooperate with the New Jersey authorities.<ref>{{cite news |newspaper=] |date=March 3, 1932 |access-date=December 18, 2016 |title=Federal Aid In Hunt Ordered By Hoover |url=http://www.charleslindbergh.com/ny/15.asp |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


The ] (later the FBI) was authorized to investigate the case, while the ], the ], the ] and the ] were told their services might be required. New Jersey officials announced a $25,000 reward for the safe return of "Little Lindy". The Lindbergh family offered an additional $50,000 reward of their own. At this time, the total reward of $75,000 (approximately $1,801,000 in 2024) was a tremendous sum of money, because the nation was in the midst of the ].
There were two interconnected circles (colored red and blue) below the message, punched through with three holes.


On March 6, a new ransom letter arrived by mail at the Lindbergh home. The letter was postmarked March 4 in ], and it carried the perforated red and blue marks. The ransom had been raised to $70,000. A third ransom note postmarked from Brooklyn, and also including the secret marks, arrived in Breckinridge's mail. The note told the Lindberghs that John Condon should be the intermediary between the Lindberghs and the kidnapper(s), and requested notification in a newspaper that the third note had been received. Instructions specified the size of the box the money should come in, and warned the family not to contact the police.
==The four colonels==
Word of the kidnapping spread quickly, and, along with police, the well-connected and well-intentioned arrived at the Lindbergh estate. Three were military colonels offering their aid, though only one had law enforcement expertise: ], superintendent of the New Jersey State Police. The other colonels were ], a ] lawyer; ] (a.k.a. "Wild Bill" Donovan, a hero of the ] who would later head the ]); and, of course, Colonel Lindbergh.


===John Condon===
Though there was precious little in the way of supporting evidence, the Four Colonels quickly concluded that the kidnapping was perpetrated by ] figures. The letter, they thought, seemed written by someone who spoke German as his native language.
During this time, ]{{snd}}a well-known Bronx personality and retired school teacher{{snd}}offered $1,000 if the kidnapper would turn the child over to a Catholic priest. Condon received a letter reportedly written by the kidnappers; it authorized Condon to be their intermediary with Lindbergh.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Aiuto |first=Russell |title=Parallel Threads, Continued |work=The Lindbergh Kidnapping |publisher=TruTv |url=http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/famous/lindbergh/3b.html |access-date =June 27, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Lindbergh accepted the letter as genuine.


Following the kidnapper's latest instructions, Condon placed a classified ad in the '']'' reading: "Money is Ready. Jafsie."<ref group=lower-alpha>"Jafsie" was a pseudonym based on a ] pronunciation of Condon's initials, "J.F.C."</ref> Condon then waited for further instructions from the culprits.<ref name="Jafsie">{{cite news|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1999/09/23/1999-09-23_half_dream_jafsie.html|title=Half Dream Jafsie|last=Maeder|first=Jay|date=September 23, 1999|newspaper=Daily News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090710195657/http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/1999/09/23/1999-09-23_half_dream_jafsie.html|archive-date=July 10, 2009|url-status=dead|access-date=June 27, 2009|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
The Colonels elected to take an unusual step, and contacted Mickey Rosner, a ] hanger-on rumored to know mobsters. Rosner, in turn, brought in two ] owners: Salvatore "Salvy" Spitale and Irving Bitz. Lindbergh quickly endorsed the duo and appointed them his intermediaries to deal with the mob.


A meeting between "Jafsie" and a representative of the group that claimed to be the kidnappers was eventually scheduled for late one evening at ] in the Bronx. According to Condon, the man sounded foreign but stayed in the shadows during the conversation, and Condon was thus unable to get a close look at his face. The man said his name was John, and he related his story: He was a "Scandinavian" sailor, part of a gang of three men and two women. The baby was being held on a boat, unharmed, but would be returned only for ransom. When Condon expressed doubt that "John" actually had the baby, he promised some proof: the kidnapper would soon return the baby's sleeping suit. The stranger asked Condon, "...&nbsp;would I burn if the package were dead?" When questioned further, he assured Condon that the baby was alive.
Unknown to Lindbergh, however, Bitz and Spitale were actually in cahoots with the New York '']'', a paper which hoped to use the duo to scoop other newspapers in the race for leads in the kidnapping story.


On March 16, Condon received a toddler's sleeping suit by mail, and a seventh ransom note.<ref name="FBI"/> After Lindbergh identified the sleeping suit, Condon placed a new ad in the ''Home News'': "Money is ready. No cops. No secret service. I come alone, like last time." On April 1 Condon received a letter saying it was time for the ransom to be delivered.
As is common in such high-profile cases, the Lindberghs were the victims of several cruel pranks and claims about their baby.


=== Ransom payment ===
==Federal interest==
The ransom was packaged in a wooden box that was custom-made in the hope that it could later be identified. The ransom money included a number of ]s; since gold certificates were about to be withdrawn from circulation,<ref name=FBI/> it was hoped greater attention would be drawn to anyone spending them.<ref name="linder"/><ref name="Manning"/> The bills were not ] but their serial numbers were recorded. Some sources credit this idea to ],<ref name=eigbook>{{cite book |last=Eig |first=Jonathan |title=Get Capone: The secret plot that captured America's most wanted gangster |url=https://archive.org/details/getcaponerealsto00eigj |url-access=limited |date=2010 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-1439199893 |page= |df=dmy-all}}</ref> others to ].<ref name=wallerbook>{{cite book |last1=Waller |first1=George |title=Kidnap: The story of the Lindbergh case |url=https://archive.org/details/kidnapstoryoflin00wall |url-access=registration |date=1961 |publisher=Dial Press |page= |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=The Money Trail: How Elmer Irey and his T-men brought down America's criminal elite |author=Folsom, Robert G. |pages=217–219 |publisher=Potomac Books |year=2010 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


On April 2, Condon was given a note by an intermediary, an unknown cab driver. Condon met "John" and told him that they had been able to raise only $50,000. The man accepted the money and gave Condon a note saying that the child was in the care of two innocent women.
The morning after the kidnapping, U.S. President ] was notified of the crime. Though the case did not seem to have any grounds for federal involvement (kidnapping then being classified as a local crime), Hoover bent the rules for the enormously popular Lindbergh, and declared that he would "move Heaven and Earth" to recover the missing child.


===Discovery of the body===
The ] (not yet called the ]) was authorized to investigate the case, while the ], ] and the ] and the Washington D.C. police were told their services might be required.
] on May 2, 1932]]
On May 12, delivery truck driver Orville Wilson and his assistant William Allen pulled to the side of a road about {{convert|4.5|mi}} south of the Lindbergh home near the hamlet of ] in neighboring Hopewell Township.<ref name="Lindbergh web"/> When Allen went into a grove of trees to urinate, he discovered the body of a toddler.<ref name="Time">{{cite magazine |title=Crime: Never-to-be-Forgotten |magazine=Time |date=May 23, 1932 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,743741,00.html?internalid=ACA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071116082351/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,743741,00.html?internalid=ACA |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 16, 2007 |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> The skull was badly fractured and the body decomposed, with evidence of scavenging by animals; there were indications of an attempt at a hasty burial.<ref name="Eaglet"/><ref name="Time"/> Gow identified the baby as the missing infant from the overlapping toes of the right foot and a shirt that she had made. It appeared the child had been killed by a blow to the head. Lindbergh insisted on cremation.<ref name="EveInd">{{cite news |title=Murdered child's body now reduced to pile of ashes |newspaper=The Evening Independent |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=N-NPAAAAIBAJ&pg=6172,6641444 |date=May 14, 1932 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


In June&nbsp;1932, officials began to suspect that the crime had been perpetrated by someone the Lindberghs knew. Suspicion fell upon Violet Sharpe, a British household servant at the Morrow home who had given contradictory information regarding her whereabouts on the night of the kidnapping. It was reported that she appeared nervous and suspicious when questioned. She died by suicide on June 10, 1932, by ingesting a silver polish that contained ] just before being questioned for the fourth time.<ref name="Lindbergh, Anne 1973">{{cite book |author=Lindbergh, Anne |title=Hour of Gold, Hour of Lead |url=https://archive.org/details/hourofgoldhourof0000lind |url-access=registration |location=San Diego, CA |publisher=Harcourt Brace Jovanovich |year=1973 |isbn=978-0151421763 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Her alibi was later confirmed, and police were criticized for heavy-handedness.<ref name="Bio">{{cite web |title=The Lindbergh Kidnapping |publisher=The Biography Channel |location=UK |url=http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/236:152/4/The_Lindbergh_Kidnapping.htm |access-date=June 28, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090710200300/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/236%3A152/4/The_Lindbergh_Kidnapping.htm |archive-date=July 10, 2009 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
New Jersey officials announced a $25,000 reward for the safe return of "Little It", additional to the Lindbergh family's offer of $50,000 — the total reward of $75,000 was a fortune in those early days of the ].


Condon was also questioned by police and his home searched, but nothing incriminating was found. Charles Lindbergh stood by Condon during this time.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Lindbergh Kidnapping |publisher=The Biography Channel UK |url=http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/236:152/5/The_Lindbergh_Kidnapping.htm |access-date=June 28, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090710200300/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/236%3A152/5/The_Lindbergh_Kidnapping.htm |archive-date=July 10, 2009 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
Several organized crime figures — notably ] — spoke from prison, offering to help return the baby to his family in exchange for money or for legal favors.


===John Condon's unofficial investigation===
==More ransom letters==
After the discovery of the body, Condon remained unofficially involved in the case. To the public, he had become a suspect and in some circles was vilified.<ref name="Press">{{cite web |title=Lindbergh Baby Booty |publisher=New York Press |date = March 11, 2003 |url=http://nypress.com/lindbergh-baby-booty-the-missing-ransom-money-may-still-be-up-there/ |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> For the next two years, he visited police departments and pledged to find "Cemetery John".
A few days after the kidnapping, a new ransom letter arrived at the Lindbergh home via the mail. ]ed in ], the letter was genuine, carrying the perforated red and blue marks. Police wanted to examine the letter, but instead, Lindbergh gave it to Rosen, who said he would pass it on to his supposed mob associates. In actuality, the note went back to the ''Daily News'', where someone photographed it. Before long, copies of the ransom note were being sold on street corners throughout New York for $5 each. Any ransom letters received after this one are therefore automatically suspect.


Condon's actions regarding the case were increasingly flamboyant. On one occasion, while riding a city bus, Condon claimed that he saw a suspect on the street and, announcing his secret identity, ordered the bus to stop. The startled driver complied and Condon darted from the bus, although his target eluded him. Condon's actions were also criticized as exploitive when he agreed to appear in a ] act regarding the kidnapping.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ministers protest billing of Condon; 25&nbsp;see Jafsie Vaudeville Act scheduled for Plainfield as tragic exploitation |work=The New York Times |date=January 5, 1936 |url=http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0B1FFB395D13728DDDAC0894D9405B868FF1D3 |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> ] published a ] account of Condon's involvement in the Lindbergh kidnapping under the title "Jafsie Tells All".<ref>{{cite web |title=Milestones Jan. 15, 1945 |work=Time Magazine |date=January 15, 1945 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,775414,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090712053358/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,775414,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 12, 2009 |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
A second ransom note then arrived, also postmarked in ]. ], Commissioner of the ], suggested that, given two Brooklyn postmarks, the kidnappers were probably working out of that city. He told Lindbergh that his officers could surveil postal letterboxes in Brooklyn, and that a device could be placed inside each letterbox to isolate the letters in sequence as they were dropped in, to help track down anyone who might be tied to the case. If Lindbergh, Jr. was being held in Brooklyn by the kidnappers, such a plan might help locate the child as well, even so far as police staging a raid to rescue the baby, Mulrooney insisted.


===Tracking the ransom money===
Lindbergh strongly disapproved of the plan. He feared for his son's life, and warned Mulrooney that if the plan were carried out, the whole of Lindbergh's considerable influence would be brought to bear on trying to ruin Mulrooney's career. Reluctantly, Mulrooney acquiesced.
]
The investigators who were working on the case were soon at a standstill. There were no developments and little evidence of any sort, so police turned their attention to tracking the ransom payments. A pamphlet was prepared with the ], and 250,000&nbsp;copies were distributed to businesses, mainly in New York City.<ref name="FBI">{{Cite web | title=The Lindbergh Kidnapping |work=FBI History – Famous Cases |publisher=Federal Bureau of Investigation |url=https://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/famcases/lindber/lindbernew.htm |access-date=June 25, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100918231213/http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/famcases/lindber/lindbernew.htm |archive-date=September 18, 2010 |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref name="Manning">{{Cite web |last=Manning |first=Lona |title=The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping |publisher=Crime Magazine |date=March 4, 2007 |url=http://www.crimemagazine.com/lindbergh-baby-kidnapping |access-date=June 24, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> A few of the ransom bills appeared in scattered locations, some as far away as Chicago and ], but those spending the bills were never found.


By a ], all gold certificates were to be exchanged for other bills by May 1, 1933.<ref name="Woolley">{{Cite web |last1=Woolley |first1=John |first2=Gerhard |last2=Peters |title=Executive Order 6102 – Requiring Gold Coin, Gold Bullion and Gold Certificates to be Delivered to the Government April 5, 1933 |publisher=The American Presidency Project |url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611&st=&st1= |access-date=June 24, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> A few days before the deadline, a man brought $2,980 to a Manhattan bank for exchange; it was later realized the bills were from the ransom. He had given his name as J.{{nbsp}}J. Faulkner of 537&nbsp;West 149th&nbsp;Street.<ref name="Manning"/> No one named Faulkner lived at that address, and a Jane Faulkner who had lived there 20&nbsp;years earlier denied involvement.<ref name="Manning"/>
The day after Lindbergh rejected Mulrooney's plan, a third letter was mailed — it too came from Brooklyn. This letter warned that since the police were now involved in the case, the ransom had been doubled to $100,000.


==Enter Jafsie== ==Arrest of Hauptmann==
{{Main|Richard Hauptmann}}
During a thirty-month period, a number of the ransom bills were spent throughout New York City. Detectives realized that many of the bills were being spent along the route of the ], which connected the Bronx with the east side of Manhattan, including the German-Austrian neighborhood of ].<ref name="linder"/>


On September 18, 1934, a Manhattan bank teller noticed a gold certificate from the ransom;<ref name="FBI"/> a New York license plate number (4U-13-41-N.Y) penciled in the bill's margin allowed it to be traced to a nearby gas station. The station manager had written down the license number because his customer was acting "suspicious" and was "possibly a counterfeiter".<ref name="FBI"/><ref name="linder"/><ref name="Manning"/><ref>{{cite web |title=National Affairs: 4U-13-41 |work=Time Magazine |date=October 1, 1934 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,930523,00.html?internalid=ACA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071116082437/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,930523,00.html?internalid=ACA |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 16, 2007 |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> The license plate belonged to a sedan owned by Richard Hauptmann of 1279 East 222nd Street in the Bronx,<ref name="linder"/> an immigrant with a criminal record in Germany. When Hauptmann was arrested, he was carrying a single 20-dollar gold certificate<ref name="FBI"/><ref name="linder"/> and over $14,000 of the ransom money was found in his garage.<ref>{{cite web |title=National Affairs Oct. 8, 1934 |work=Time Magazine |date=October 8, 1934 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,770014-2,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090712060018/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,770014-2,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 12, 2009 |access-date=June 28, 2009 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
At about this time in the ongoing drama, John F. Condon forced his way onstage. He was a 72 year-old school teacher in the ], and a prolific writer of fiery letters to newspapers, especially the Bronx '']''. He usually signed his letters with ]s like "P.A. Triot" or "J.U. Stice".


Hauptmann was arrested, interrogated, and beaten at least once throughout the following day and night.<ref name="Manning"/> Hauptmann stated that the money and other items had been left with him by his friend and former business partner ]. Fisch had died on March 29, 1934, shortly after returning to Germany.<ref name="linder"/> Hauptmann stated he learned only after Fisch's death that the shoebox that was left with him contained a considerable sum of money. He kept the money because he claimed that it was owed to him from a business deal that he and Fisch had made.<ref name="linder"/> Hauptmann consistently denied any connection to the crime or knowledge that the money in his house was from the ransom.
Condon wrote a letter to the ''Home News'' — signed with his legal name, for once — proclaiming his willingness to help the Lindbergh case in any way he could. He added $1000 of his own money to the reward.


When the police searched Hauptmann's home, they found a considerable amount of additional evidence that linked him to the crime. One item was a notebook that contained a sketch of the construction of a ladder similar to that which was found at the Lindbergh home in March 1932. John Condon's telephone number, along with his address, were discovered written on a closet wall in the house. A key piece of evidence, a section of wood, was discovered in the attic of the home. After being examined by an expert, it was determined to be an exact match to the wood used in the construction of the ladder found at the scene of the crime.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ladder – Crime of the Century |url=https://crimeofthecentury.weebly.com/ladder.html|access-date=2022-01-28|website=crimeofthecentury.weebly.com}}</ref>
Afterwards, Condon received a letter care of the ''Home News''. Purportedly written by the kidnappers, it was marked with the punctured red-and-blue circles, and authorized Condon as their intermediary with Lindbergh; The Lone Eagle accepted the letter as genuine, though at the time, neither man seemed to know that copies of the first mailed ransom letter were being sold by the hundreds, and that, by now, a great many people must have known the "signature" required to forge a letter from the kidnappers.


Hauptmann was indicted in the Bronx on September 24, 1934, for extorting the $50,000 ransom from Charles Lindbergh.<ref name="linder"/> Two weeks later, on October 8, Hauptmann was indicted in New Jersey for the murder of Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr.<ref name="FBI"/> Two days later, he was surrendered to New Jersey authorities by New York Governor ] to face charges directly related to the kidnapping and murder of the child. Hauptmann was moved to the Hunterdon County Jail in Flemington, New Jersey, on October 19.<ref name="FBI"/>
Following the latest letter's instructions, Condon placed a classified ad in the '']'': "Money is Ready. Jafsie". Condon's new pseudonym was based on a ] pronunciation of his initials, "J.F.C." Condon then waited for further instructions from the ](s).


==Enter Violet Sharpe== ==Trial and execution==
===Trial===
Violet Sharpe was a servant for the Lindbergh family. She usually stayed at the Next Day Hill. The day of the kidnapping, she was called by Betty Gow that Chas was sick and would not go to the Next Day Hill the next day. She was interviewed by the police, and she was acting very nervous and suspicious. She said the day of the crime, she had received a call from a man she'd met before. He asked if he would go to the movies with her. She accepted the offer, and she went with the man and another couple. She said she couldn't remember the movie she saw, the man's name, or the names of the couple that she went with. On another interview, she suddenly remembered that she did not go to the movies but to the Peanut Grill. The man's name was Ernie, she said. Also, her sister had come the day of the kidnapping. She had left on March 6 without telling police. On her last interview, she was just as hostile as she was on the last two interviews. They found cards in her room with the name Ernie Brinkert on them. She identified him as the man she went out with. Soon after, she was found dead. She committed suicide drinking poison. She did not kidnap the baby, but people believe she could have helped pull if off. Police asked Ernie Brinkert if he knew Sharpe, and he denied it. Six months later, Ernie Miller identified himself as the person he had asked Sharpe to go out with him. The two men looked nothing alike.
]
==Gaston Means, the socialite, and the baby trail==
Hauptmann was charged with ]. The trial was held at the ] in ], and was soon dubbed the "Trial of the Century".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/lindbergh/sfeature/crime.html |title=The Kidnapping |publisher=] |access-date=September 29, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110926075405/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/lindbergh/sfeature/crime.html |archive-date=September 26, 2011 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Reporters swarmed the town, and every hotel room was booked. Judge ] presided over the trial.
While the irrepressible Jafsie was shoehorning himself into the investigation, a professional ] named ] was drawn into the case. He took a telephone call from ], a wealthy Washington D.C. socialite who'd taken an interest in the kidnapping.


In exchange for rights to publish Hauptmann's story in their newspaper, ] was hired by the '']'' to serve as Hauptmann's attorney.<ref name=":0">{{cite book |title=Crime of the Century: The Lindbergh kidnapping hoax |first1=Gregory |last1=Ahlgren |first2=Stephen |last2=Monier |first3=Adolph |last3=Caso |editor-first=Adolph |editor-last=Caso |publisher=Branden Books |year=2009}}</ref> ], ], led the prosecution.
It remains unclear how McLean became convinced that Means could offer any help in the case, but he accepted her invitation. He told her that due to his many criminal contacts, he could quickly solve the kidnapping which seemed to have stumped police. Sure enough, a few days later, he told McLean that he had contacted the kidnappers and that he was their only authorized contact. As proof, Means provided a ] detail which had been withheld by police: the baby's sleeping suit lacked a diaper-changing flap then typical of such clothing. McLean contacted her friend, Rear Admiral Emory Land, who was a distant Lindbergh relative. When Land related the sleeping suit description to Mr. Lindbergh, the aviator was stunned: his son's sleeping suit had in fact, lacked a diaper flap.


Evidence against Hauptmann included $20,000 of the ransom money found in his garage and testimony alleging that his handwriting and spelling were similar to those of the ransom notes. Eight handwriting experts, including ],<ref name="fisher2">{{cite book |last=Fisher |first=Jim |title=The Lindbergh Case |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=99gyrLNk8kwC |year= 1994 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-2147-3 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> pointed out similarities between the ransom notes and Hauptmann's writing specimens. The defense called an expert to rebut this evidence, while two others declined to testify;<ref name=fisher2/> the latter two demanded $500 before looking at the notes and were dismissed when Lloyd Fisher, a member of Hauptmann's legal team,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/hunterdon-county/express-times/index.ssf/2011/12/trial_of_the_century_over_lind.html |title='Trial of the Century' over Lindbergh baby murder commemorated in new portraits |date=December 4, 2011 |access-date=February 26, 2018 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> declined.<ref name=gardner>{{cite book |last=Gardner |first=Lloyd C. |author-link=Lloyd Gardner |title=The Case That Never Dies |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NVLjmssWMJoC |year= 2004 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-3385-8 |page=336 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Other experts retained by the defense were never called to testify.<ref>{{cite book |author=Farr, Julia |title=Letter from Julia Farr to Lloyd Fisher |publisher=New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives |year= 1935 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
Curiously, Means reported the same fact as the letter-writer: the ransom was now doubled to $100,000. McLean gathered the money and gave it to Means, who insisted that while he could deliver the cash, the kidnappers would return the child only to a Roman Catholic priest. Father Francis J. Hurney agreed to receive the child. Means told Hurney, Land and McLean to retire to McLean's second home in ] and await further news.


On the basis of the work of ] at the ], the State introduced photographs demonstrating that part of the wood from the ladder matched a plank from the floor of Hauptmann's attic: the type of wood, the direction of tree growth, the milling pattern, the inside and outside surface of the wood, and the grain on both sides were identical, and four oddly placed nail holes lined up with nail holes in joists in Hauptmann's attic.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Sixteenth Rail: The Evidence, the Scientist, and the Lindbergh Kidnapping |year=2013 |first=Adam |last=Schrager |publisher=Fulcrum Publishing |isbn=978-1-55591-716-6 |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://foresthistory.org/csi-madison-wisconsin-wooden-witness/ |title=CSI Madison, Wisconsin: Wooden Witness |date=March 31, 2009 |first=Amanda T. |last=Ross |publisher=Forest History Society |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Condon's address and telephone number were written in pencil on a closet door in Hauptmann's home, and Hauptmann told police that he had written Condon's address:
There were now ongoing negotiations with two sets of alleged kidnappers. As Kurland writes, "nobody could explain why there were two different groups were trying to collect the ransom. Nonetheless, Lindbergh told Land/McLean/Means to go ahead."


{{blockquote|I must have read it in the paper about the story. I was a little bit interested and keep a little bit record of it, and maybe I was just on the closet, and was reading the paper and put it down the address ... I can't give you any explanation about the telephone number.}}
In the meantime, Means was stringing McLean and her entourage along. Following his instructions, the group moved from Maryland, to South Carolina, to El Paso, Texas (Means reported that the baby had been hidden in ]). At no point did they recover the Lindbergh child.


A sketch that Wilentz suggested represented a ladder was found in one of Hauptmann's notebooks. Hauptmann said this picture and other sketches therein were the work of a child.<ref>{{cite book |title=The State of New Jersey vs. Bruno Richard Hauptmann |series=Hunterdon County Court of Oyer and Termner |volume=5 |page=2606 |year=1935 |publisher=New Jersey State Law Library}}</ref>
McLean was tiring of the games. She demanded Means return either the money or produce the Lindbergh baby. When Means balked, McLean telephoned police. Means and another man were arrested and convicted of various crimes, and sentenced to prison.


Despite not having an obvious source of earned income, Hauptmann had bought a $400 radio (approximately {{Inflation|US|400|1934|r=-1|fmt=eq|cursign=$}}) and sent his wife on a trip to Germany.
==Cemetery John==
While Means was preparing money for his group of supposed kidnappers, "Jafsie" was in contact with a different group of supposed kidnappers. The meeting was scheduled for late one evening at ].


Hauptmann was identified as the man to whom the ransom money was delivered. Other witnesses testified that it was Hauptmann who had spent some of the Lindbergh gold certificates; that he had been seen in the area of the estate, in ], near ], on the day of the kidnapping; and that he had been absent from work on the day of the ransom payment and had quit his job two days later. Hauptmann never sought another job afterward, yet continued to live comfortably.<ref>{{cite magazine |author=James, Bill |year=2011 |magazine=Popular Crime |title= |pages=147–161}}</ref>
According to Condon, the man stayed in the shadows during the conversation, and he was thus unable to get a close look at his face. The man said his name was John, and he related his story: he was a "]n" ], part of a gang of three men and two women. The Lindbergh child was unharmed and being held on a ], but the kidnappers were still not ready to return him or receive the ransom.


When the prosecution rested its case, the defense opened with a lengthy examination of Hauptmann. In his testimony, Hauptmann denied being guilty, insisting that the box of gold certificates had been left in his garage by a friend, ], who had returned to Germany in December 1933 and died there in March 1934. Hauptmann said that he had one day found a shoe box left behind by Fisch, which Hauptmann had stored on the top shelf of his kitchen broom closet, later discovering the money, which he later found to be almost $40,000 (approximately {{Inflation|US-GDP|40000|1934|r=-3|fmt=eq|cursign=$}}). Hauptmann said that, because Fisch had owed him about $7,500 in business funds, Hauptmann had kept the money for himself and had lived on it since January&nbsp;1934.
When Condon expressed doubt that Cemetery John actually had the baby, he promised some proof: the kidnapper would soon return the baby's sleeping suit.


The defense called Hauptmann's wife, Anna, to corroborate the Fisch story. On cross-examination, she admitted that while she hung her apron every day on a hook higher than the top shelf, she could not remember seeing any shoe box there. Later, rebuttal witnesses testified that Fisch could not have been at the scene of the crime, and that he had no money for medical treatments when he died of tuberculosis. Fisch's landlady testified that he could barely afford the $3.50 weekly rent of his room.
Lindbergh insisted that Mulrooney not be informed, and so "Cemetery John" was not followed by police after the meeting.


In his closing summation, Reilly argued that the evidence against Hauptmann was entirely circumstantial, because no reliable witness had placed Hauptmann at the scene of the crime, nor were his fingerprints found on the ladder, on the ransom notes, or anywhere in the nursery.<ref>{{cite book |title=The State of New Jersey vs. Bruno Richard Hauptmann |series=Hunterdon County Court of Oyer and Termner |volume=11 |pages=4687–4788 |year=1935 |publisher=New Jersey State Law Library}}</ref>
Condon would later identify the stranger as "sounding foreign". The stranger asked Dr. Condon " ... would I burn , if the package were dead?" When questioned further, he assured Dr. Condon that the baby was alive.


===Appeals===
==Enter John Hughes Curtis==
Hauptmann was convicted on February 13, 1935, and immediately sentenced to death. His attorneys appealed to the ], which at the time was the state's highest court; the appeal was argued on June 29, 1935.<ref>{{cite book |author=Lutz, William |title=Plain Facts about the Hauptmann Case |year=c. 1937 |publisher=New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives}}</ref>


New Jersey Governor ] secretly visited Hauptmann in his cell on the evening of October 16, accompanied by a ] who spoke German fluently. Hoffman urged members of the Court of Errors and Appeals to visit Hauptmann.
There was another complication in the case when Commodore John Hughes Curtis became entangled in the kidnapping. Curtis reported that he was approached outside a ] ] by a man who called himself "Sam."


In late January 1936, while declaring that he held no position on the guilt or innocence of Hauptmann, Hoffman cited evidence that the crime was not a "one person" job and directed Schwarzkopf to continue a thorough and impartial investigation in an effort to bring all parties involved to justice.<ref>{{cite book |author=Hoffman, Harold Giles |title=Letter from Governor Hoffman to Colonel H. Norman Schwarzkopf |publisher=New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives |date=January 26, 1936 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
Sam said he had been part of the kidnapping gang, but, after a quarrel, decided to split from them. He could return the baby for only $25,000 and chose Curtis as his representative.


It became known among the press that on March 27, Hoffman was considering a second reprieve of Hauptmann's death sentence and was seeking opinions about whether the governor had the right to issue a second reprieve.<ref>{{cite news |title=Hoffman seeks reprieve advice |newspaper=The Daily Princetonian |date=March 28, 1936 |publisher=Princeton University Library}}</ref>
When Condon learned of Curtis's story, he promptly declared it a fraud. Lindbergh was not so sure and considered paying him the money.


On March 30, 1936, Hauptmann's second and final appeal asking for clemency from the New Jersey Board of Pardons was denied.<ref>{{cite news |author=Herman, Albert B., Clerk of the Board of Pardons |title=Board of Pardons Press Release |date=March 30, 1936 |publisher=New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives}}</ref> Hoffman later announced that this decision would be the final legal action in the case, and that he would not grant another reprieve.<ref>{{cite news |author=Blackman, Samuel G. |title=Pardons court again denies Hauptmann plea and governor declares "No reprieve" |newspaper=The Titusville Herald |date=March 31, 1936 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> Nonetheless, there was a postponement, when the Mercer County grand jury, investigating the confession and arrest of Trenton attorney, Paul Wendel, requested a delay from Warden Mark Kimberling.<ref>{{cite news |author=Porter, Russell B. |title=Hauptmann gets a stay for at least 48&nbsp;hours at grand jury request |newspaper=] |date=April 1, 1936 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> This, the final stay, ended when the Mercer County prosecutor informed Kimberling that the grand jury had adjourned after voting to end its investigation without charging Wendel.<ref>{{cite book |author=Marshall, Erwin E., Prosecutor of the Pleas |title=Letter from Erwin Marshall to Colonel Mark O. Kimberling |publisher=New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives |date=April 3, 1936 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
The New York police questioned Curtis, whose story quickly fell apart. Curtis announced that the scheme was a fraud: he'd hoped to sell his phony story to the press in order to raise money to pay off some creditors.


===Execution===
In a strange turn of events, Curtis was charged by the authorities — not with filing a false report, but with ] for his supposed dealings with the kidnappers. He was fined $1,000, and given a suspended one-year sentence.
Hauptmann turned down a large offer from a ] newspaper for a confession and refused a last-minute offer to commute his sentence from the death penalty to life without ] in exchange for a confession. He was executed by the ] on April 3, 1936.


After his death, some reporters and independent investigators came up with numerous questions about the way in which the investigation had been run and the fairness of the trial, including witness tampering and planted evidence. Twice in the 1980s, Anna Hauptmann sued the state of New Jersey for the ] of her husband. The suits were dismissed due to ] and because the ] had run out.<ref>{{Cite web |last=] |date=1994-10-20 |title=Anna Hauptmann; Wife of Man Convicted in Lindbergh Murder |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-10-20-mn-52380-story.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210426140100/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-10-20-mn-52380-story.html |archive-date=2021-04-26 |access-date=2021-04-26 |website=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US}}</ref> She continued fighting to clear his name until her death, at age 95, in 1994.<ref>{{Cite news |date=1994-10-19 |title=Hauptmann's Widow Dies |language=en-us |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/19/obituaries/hauptmann-s-widow-dies.html |access-date=2021-04-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150526104709/https://www.nytimes.com/1994/10/19/obituaries/hauptmann-s-widow-dies.html |archive-date=2015-05-26 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>
==Jafsie delivers the ransom==
A few days after Curtis's initial declaration, Condon got a package in the mail: it was a toddler's sleeping suit. Condon showed it to Lindbergh, who quickly identified it as his son's. Kurland writes, "On what basis he made this identification is not known, since the garment contained no laundrymark or other means of distinguishing it from the thousands of others identical to it sold in the stores."


==Alternative theories==
After the delivery of the sleeping suit, Condon took out a new ad in the ''Home News'' declaring, "Money is ready. No cops. No secret service. I come alone, like last time."
A number of books have asserted Hauptmann's innocence, generally highlighting inadequate police work at the crime scene, Lindbergh's interference in the investigation, the ineffectiveness of Hauptmann's counsel, and weaknesses in the witnesses and physical evidence. ], in particular, questioned much of the evidence, such as the origin of the ladder and the testimony of many of the witnesses.


According to author Lloyd Gardner, a fingerprint expert, Erastus Mead Hudson, applied the then-rare silver nitrate fingerprint process to the ladder and did not find Hauptmann's fingerprints, even in places that the maker of the ladder must have touched. According to Gardner, officials refused to consider this expert's findings, and the ladder was then washed of all fingerprints.<ref>{{cite book |author=Gardner, Lloyd G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t0ZPAgAAQBAJ&q=%22+testimony+of+dr.+erastus%22&pg=PA344 |title=The case that never dies |page=344 |year=2004| publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn = 978-0813554471}}</ref>
One month and one day after the child was kidnapped, on ], 1932 — perhaps a significant date — Condon received a letter from the purported kidnappers. They were ready to accept payment. The ransom had been bargained down to $70,000.


Jim Fisher, a former FBI agent and professor at ],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fisher |first=Jim |title=Biography |url=http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/bio.html |access-date=April 29, 2011 |archive-date=July 19, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719193423/http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/bio.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> has written two books, ''The Lindbergh Case'' (1987)<ref>{{cite book |last=Fisher |first=Jim |title=The Lindbergh Case |publisher=Rutgers University Press |orig-year=1987 |year=1994 |pages=480 |isbn=0-8135-2147-5}}</ref> and ''The Ghosts of Hopewell'' (1999),<ref>{{cite book |last=Fisher |first=Jim |title=The Ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the Record Straight in the Lindbergh Case |publisher=Southern Illinois Univ Press |year=1999 |page= |isbn=0-8093-2285-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/ghostsofhopewell00jimf/page/224 }}</ref> addressing what he calls a "revision movement" regarding the case.<ref>{{cite web |last=Fisher |first=Jim |title=The Lindbergh Case: A Look Back to the Future |page=3 |url=http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/lindbergh/s8243_3.html |access-date=April 29, 2011 |quote=For the Lindbergh case, the revisionist movement began in 1976 with the publication of a book by a tabloid reporter named Anthony Scaduto. In ''Scapegoat'', Scaduto asserts that the Lindbergh baby was not murdered and that Hauptmann was the victim of a mass conspiracy of prosecution, perjury and fabricated physical evidence. |df=dmy-all |archive-date=October 3, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111003103347/http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/lindbergh/s8243_3.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> He summarizes:
The ransom was packaged in a wooden box which was custom-made — with hopes that it could later be identified. $50,000 was in relatively new bank notes while $20,000 was in the older ]s then being withdrawn from circulation. It was hoped that anyone passing large amounts of gold notes would draw attention to themselves, and thus aid in identifying the culprit(s).


{{blockquote|Today, the Lindbergh phenomena{{sic}} is a giant hoax perpetrated by people who are taking advantage of an uninformed and cynical public. Notwithstanding all of the books, TV programs, and legal suits, Hauptmann is as guilty today as he was in 1932 when he kidnapped and killed the son of Mr. and Mrs. Charles Lindbergh.<ref>{{cite web |last=Fisher |first=Jim |title=The Lindbergh Case: How can such a guilty kidnapper be so innocent? |page=3 |url=http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/lindbergh/a1988_3.html |access-date=April 29, 2011}}</ref>}}
The next evening, Condon was given a note by cab driver Raymond Perrone, who said he'd been paid by a man to deliver the note to Condon. The note was the first in a series of convoluted instructions, leading Condon and Lindbergh all over ]. Eventually, Condon and Lindbergh finally delivered the money to ]. Condon met a man he thought might have been "Cemetery John", and told him that they'd been able to raise only $50,000. The man accepted the money, and gave Condon a note. Again, Lindbergh (who saw the man only from a distance) had insisted the police not be informed of the procedure, and again, a suspect got away without anyone following him.


Another book, ''Hauptmann's Ladder: A Step-by-Step Analysis of the Lindbergh Kidnapping'' by Richard T. Cahill Jr., concludes that Hauptmann was guilty but questions whether he should have been executed.<ref>{{cite news |last=Williams |first=David |date=2014-04-03 |title='Hauptmann's Ladder' revisits crime |url=https://www.courier-journal.com/story/entertainment/books/2014/04/03/hauptmanns-ladder-revisits-crime/7266717/ |newspaper=] |accessdate=2025-01-10 |archiveurl=https://archive.today/2025.01.10-131950/https://www.courier-journal.com/story/entertainment/books/2014/04/03/hauptmanns-ladder-revisits-crime/7266717/ |archivedate=2025-01-10 }}</ref>
The note reported that the child was being held on a boat called ''The Nelly'' in ] with two women. He told Condon the two women were innocent. Lindbergh went there, and searched the piers. There was no boat called ''The Nelly'', and a desperate Lindbergh took to flying an airplane low over the piers in an attempt to startle the kidnappers into showing themselves. After two days, Lindbergh admitted he'd been fooled.


According to John Reisinger in ''Master Detective'',{{Citation needed|date=February 2017}} New Jersey detective Ellis Parker conducted an independent investigation in 1936 and obtained a signed confession from former Trenton attorney Paul Wendel, creating a sensation and resulting in a temporary stay of execution for Hauptmann. The case against Wendel collapsed, however, when he insisted his confession had been coerced.<ref name="Master">{{cite book |title=Master Detective – Americas Real-life Sherlock|isbn=978-0983881827|last1=Reisinger|first1=John|date=February 2012|publisher=Glyphworks }}</ref>
==The body==
On May 12, 1932, delivery truck driver William Allen pulled his truck to the side of a road about 4.5 miles from the Lindbergh home. He went to a grove of trees to urinate, and there he discovered the corpse of a toddler. Allen notified police, who took the body to a ] in nearby ].


Robert Zorn's 2012 book '']'' proposes that Hauptmann was part of a conspiracy with two other German-born men, John and Walter Knoll. Zorn's father, economist Eugene Zorn, believed that as a teenager he had witnessed the conspiracy being discussed.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-08/news/32578390_1_lindbergh-kidnapping-true-magazine-charles-lindbergh |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307231540/http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-08/news/32578390_1_lindbergh-kidnapping-true-magazine-charles-lindbergh |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 7, 2014 |title=Tale of a Lindbergh conspiracy draws attention |author=Colimore, Edward |publisher=The Inquirer |date=July 8, 2012 |access-date=August 19, 2012 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
The body was badly decomposed, and had been partly eaten by ]s. The skull was badly fractured, the left leg and both hands were missing; and it was impossible to determine if the body was a boy or a girl.


==In popular culture==
Lindbergh and Gow identified the baby as the missing infant after less than three minutes' examination, based on the overlapping toes of the right foot, and the shirt that Gow had made for the baby. They surmised that the child had been killed by a blow to the head. The body was soon afterwards ] at Mr. Lindbergh's order.
]


===In novels===
The identification of the tiny body remains a point of contention on the case. In fact, Dr. Philip Van Ingen, Lindbergh Jr.'s pediatrician, had seen the baby only a few weeks before the kidnapping, and after his examination of the remains, refused to identify the corpse as the Lindbergh baby's, stating, "If someone were to come in here and offer me ten million dollars ... I simply wouldn't be able to identify those remains."
* 1934: ] was inspired by circumstances of the case when she described the kidnapping of Daisy Armstrong in her ] novel '']''.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=99gyrLNk8kwC&q=%22orient+express%22+lindbergh&pg=PA249 |title=The Lindbergh Case: A Story of Two Lives |author=Jim Fisher |publisher=Rutgers University Press |year= 1994 |page=249 |isbn=978-0813521473 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
* 1981: The kidnapping and its aftermath served as the inspiration for ]'s book '']''.<ref name=sendak>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-k6Nfqud-kIC&q=%22outside+over+there%22+lindbergh&pg=PA209 |title=The Reception of Grimms' Fairy Tales: Responses, reactions, revisions |editor=Haase, Donald |publisher=Wayne State University Press |year=1996 |isbn=978-0814322086 |page=209 |quote=In it, I am the Lindbergh baby.}}</ref>
* 1991: ]'s novel ''Stolen Away'', fifth in his Nathan Heller series, in which the fictional private eye gets involved in real historical mysteries and meets historical figures, Heller gets involved in investigating the Lindbergh kidnapping, interviews psychic ], and decades later meets a man whom they both believe to be the kidnapped and never returned Charles Lindbergh, Jr., having been raised and lived his whole life under another name. It won the 1992 ] for best hardcover private eye novel.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.privateeyewriters.com/shamus_winners.html | title=The Private Eye Writers of America }}</ref>
* 1993: In the novel '']'' by ] and ] based on the novel, a character takes inspiration from the Lindbergh kidnapping for his crime.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Extract: Along Came A Spider by James Patterson|url=https://www.deadgoodbooks.co.uk/extract-along-came-a-spider-james-patterson/|date=2017-04-26|website=Dead Good|access-date=2020-05-29}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Mitchell|first=Elvis|date=2001-04-06|title=Film Review; Weaving an Intricate Web To Trap a Wily Kidnapper|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/06/movies/film-review-weaving-an-intricate-web-to-trap-a-wily-kidnapper.html|access-date=2020-05-29|issn=0362-4331}}</ref>
* 2013: ''The Aviator's Wife'' by ] is a work of historical fiction told from the perspective of Anne Morrow Lindbergh.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Aviators Wife|url=https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/212004/the-aviators-wife-by-melanie-benjamin/|work=Penguin Random House}}</ref>
* 2022: ''The Lindbergh Nanny'' by ] is a work of historical fiction told from the perspective of Betty Gow.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Lindbergh Nanny|url=https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250827401/thelindberghnanny/ |work=Macmillan Publishers}}</ref>


==Investigation== ===In music===
* May 1932: Just one day after the Lindbergh baby was discovered murdered, the prolific country recording artist Bob Miller (under the pseudonym Bob Ferguson) recorded two songs for ] on May 13, 1932, commemorating the event. The songs were released on Columbia 15759-D with the titles "Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr." and "There's a New Star Up in Heaven (Baby Lindy Is Up There)".<ref name="bob-miller">{{cite book |author=Russell, Tony |title=Country music records: a discography, 1921–1942 |url=https://archive.org/details/countrymusicreco00tony |url-access=registration |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=US |year=2004 |page=|isbn=978-0-19-513989-1 }}</ref>
Once the Little Eaglet was presumed dead, the U.S. Congress rushed through legislation making kidnapping a ]. The Bureau of Investigations could now aid the case more directly.


===In film===
In July 1932, with few leads, officials began to suspect an "inside job": someone the Lindberghs trusted may have betrayed the family. Suspicions fell upon Violet Sharp, a British household servant of the Lindbergh home. She had lied about her whereabouts on the night of the kidnapping, and she eventually committed suicide after repeated questioning by the authorities.
* 2011: The kidnapping, investigation, and trial are featured in '']'', the biopic of ], Director of the ] (directed by ] and starring ]).


==The ransom== ===In television===
* 1976: '']''
Investigation of the case was soon caught in the doldrums: there were no developments and little evidence of any sort, so police turned their attention to tracking the ransom payments. A list of the serial numbers on the ransom bills were widely circulated to banks and businesses. During the following three years, a few of the bills turned up in scattered locations — as far away as ] and ] — but the people spending them eluded capture.
* 1990: In the opening episode to Season Two of '']'', after being shot ] says that he "wishes he could have cracked the Lindbergh kidnapping case".
* 1995: In '']'' ], as the FBI raids the Simpson family's home to capture Homer's mother, Mona, Abraham Simpson attempts to stall the FBI by claiming to be the Lindbergh baby.
* 1996: '']'' (1996)
* 2012: In ], Season 14, Episode 3, ADA ] says "I'll get him convicted for kidnapping the Lindbergh baby", regarding how the jury will perceive a defendant.
* 2024: In '']'', Season 1, Episode 1, Pippa cites the 200 people who confessed to the murder, stating that at least 199 must have been fake.


==See also==
Gold Certificates were to be turned in by May 1, 1932. After that day, they would be worthless. A few days before the deadline, a man in Manhattan brought in $2,990 of the ransom money to be exchanged. The bank was so busy, however, that no one remembered much of what he'd looked like. He'd filled out a required form, giving his name as J. J. Faulkner and his address as 537 West 159th Street in New York City.
* ]
* ]


== Explanatory notes ==
When authorities visited the address, they learned no one named Faulkner had lived there — or anywhere nearby — for many years. U.S. Treasury officials kept looking, and eventually learned that a woman named Jane Faulkner had lived at the address in question in 1913. She had moved after she married a German man named Gerhardt. The couple was tracked down, and both denied any involvement in the crime.
{{notelist}}


== General and cited references ==
Mr. Gerhardt had two children from his first marriage. Though neither could be conclusively tied to the kidnapping, there were some curious facts which lead authorities to suspect involvement: Gerhardt's son worked as a ] and lived about one block from "Jafsie", while Gerhardt's daughter had married a German gardener. "Jafsie" again figured in the investigation: after hearing the three men from the Gerhardt family speak, Condon declared that Gerhardt's son-in-law, the gardener, had a voice very similar to Cemetery John's. The police continued their investigation (Kurland characterizes it as "harassment"), and the gardener killed himself.
* {{cite book |author1=Ahlgren, Gregory |author2=Monier, Stephen |title=Crime of the Century: The Lindbergh kidnapping hoax |publisher=Branden Books |year=1993 |isbn=0-8283-1971-5}}
* {{cite book |author-link=Noel Behn |author=Behn, Noel |title=Lindbergh: The Crime |url=https://archive.org/details/lindberghcrime00behn |url-access=registration |publisher=Atlantic Monthly Press |year=1994 |isbn=0-8711-3544-2}}
* {{cite book |author-link=A. Scott Berg |author=Berg, A. Scott |title=] |publisher=G. P. Putnam's Sons |year=1998 |isbn=0-3991-4449-8}}
* {{cite book |author=Cahill, Richard T. Jr. |title=]: A Step-by-Step Analysis of the Lindbergh Kidnapping |publisher=Kent State University Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-60635-193-2}}
* {{cite book |author=Cook, William A. |title=The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping |publisher=Sunbury Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-6200-6339-2}}
* {{cite book |author=Doherty, Thomas |title=Little Lindy Is Kidnapped: How the Media Covered the Crime of the Century |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2020 |isbn= 978-0-2311-9848-6}}
* {{cite book |author=Fisher, Jim |title=The Lindbergh Case |publisher=Rutgers University Press |year=1994 |orig-year=1987 |isbn=0-8135-2147-5}}
* {{cite book |author=Fisher, Jim |title=The Ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the Record Straight in the Lindbergh Case |publisher=Southern Illinois University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-8093-2717-1}}
* {{cite book |author=Gardner, Lloyd C. |title=The Case That Never Dies: The Lindbergh Kidnapping |publisher=Rutgers University Press |year=2004 |isbn=0-813-53385-6}}
* {{cite book |author-link=Ludovic Kennedy |author=Kennedy, Sir Ludovic |title=The Airman and the Carpenter: The Lindbergh Kidnapping and the Framing of Richard Hauptmann |url=https://archive.org/details/airmancarpenterl00kenn |url-access=registration |publisher=Viking Press |year=1985 |isbn=0-670-80606-4}}
* {{cite book |author=Kurland, Michael |title=A Gallery of Rogues: Portraits in True Crime |publisher=Prentice Hall General Reference |year=1994 |isbn=0-671-85011-3}}
* {{cite book |author=Melsky, Michael |series=The Dark Corners |title=Of the Lindbergh Kidnapping |volume=1 |publisher=Infinity Publishing |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-4958-1042-8}}
* {{cite book |author=Milton, Joyce |title=Loss of Eden: A biography of Charles and Anne Morrow Lindbergh |url=https://archive.org/details/lossofedenbiogra00milt |url-access=registration |publisher=HarperCollins |year=1993 |isbn=0-0601-6503-0}}
* {{cite book |author=Newton, Michael |title=The Encyclopedia of Unsolved Crimes |publisher=Checkmark Books |year=2004 |isbn=0-8160-4981-5}}
* {{cite book |author=Norris, William |title=A Talent to Deceive |publisher=SynergEbooks |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-7443-1594-3}}
* {{cite book |author=Reisinger, John |title=Master Detective: Ellis Parker's independent investigation |publisher=Citadel Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-8065-2750-5 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/masterdetectivel0000reis }}
* {{cite book |author=Scaduto, Anthony |author-link=Anthony Scaduto |title=Scapegoat: The Lonesome Death of Richard Hauptmann |url=https://archive.org/details/scapegoatlonesom0000scad |url-access=registration |publisher=G. P. Putnam's Sons |year=1976 |isbn=0-3991-1660-5}}
* {{cite book |author=Schrager, Adam J. |title=The Sixteenth Rail: The evidence, the scientist, and the Lindbergh kidnapping |publisher=Fulcrum Publishing |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-5559-1716-6}}
* {{cite book |author=Waller, George |title=Kidnap: The Story of the Lindbergh case |url=https://archive.org/details/kidnapstoryoflin00wall |url-access=registration |publisher=Dial Press |year=1961}}
* {{cite book |author=Wilson, Colin |title=Murder in the 1930s |publisher=Carroll & Graf |year=1992 |isbn = 978-0-881-84855-7}}
* {{cite book |author=Zorn, Robert |title=]: The undiscovered mastermind of the Lindbergh kidnapping |publisher=Overlook Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-5902-0856-4}}


==Citations==
Condon was growing more flamboyant in his actions. One occasion, while riding a city bus, he saw a suspect and, announcing his ], ordered the bus to a stop. The startled driver complied, and Condon darted from the bus, though Condon's target eluded him. Another time he ] for his clandestine activities, with a collar pulled up to hide his handlebar mustache. The New York Police were by now aware of the "Jafsie" newspaper ads, and wanted to know who the mysterious Jafsie was, but Lindbergh refused to say anything.
{{reflist}}


==External links==
Eventually, Condon's flamboyance made it obvious that he was Jafsie. Tiring of Condon's interference, the police threatened to charge him as an accomplice to the crime. He afterwards curtailed his involvement.
* {{cite web |url=https://archive.org/details/LindberghBabyKidnappingFBIFiles |title=FBI files on the Lindbergh Kidnapping}}
* {{cite web|url=http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/lindbergh/chrono.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112001655/http://jimfisher.edinboro.edu/lindbergh/chrono.html|archive-date=2020-11-12|url-status=live|title=Lindbergh Case Chronology}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.nj.gov/state/archives/slcsp001.html |title=Photographic Evidence from the trial |publisher=New Jersey State Archives}}


{{FBI}}
The geographical pattern of the sightings led the investigators to conclude that the wanted person or persons lived in ]. A circular was sent out to gas stations throughout New York state with a list of the serial numbers of the ransom bills. The station attendants were requested to write the registration number of any vehicle driven by someone who used one of the bills to pay for ].
{{Lindbergh kidnapping}}

{{Anne Morrow Lindbergh}}
==Bruno Hauptmann==
{{Charles Lindbergh}}
<!--]-->
{{main article|Bruno Hauptmann}}

More than two years after the kidnapping, on ], ], a gold certificate from the ransom money was discovered by one of James J. Finn's agents, Thomas H. Sisk; it had a license plate number written on it. The ransom bills were paid when a man drove into a gas station, and the gas attendant wrote down the license plate number after reading a flyer warning about certain bills. The license plate belonged to a blue ] sedan owned by Bruno Richard Hauptmann, a ] immigrant with a ] in his homeland. After his immigration he preferred to use his second forename "Richard", which was more familiar to American native speakers of English than "]". In order to give it a more foreign touch the press used his first forename Bruno for reports during the trial instead of "Richard".

He was arrested a day after passing the ransom money. Police searched his home and found nearly $15,000 of the ransom money in the garage. Again, the scene was not secured, and reporters were allowed to wander the house. Hauptmann was arrested. When he was interviewed, he said that a man named Fisch, who had died earlier, was delivering the money in segments. When he was put in custody, the money "mysteriously" stopped coming. He also had notebooks full of sketches of ladders. The next day and later charged with the murder.

==Hauptmann's trial, conviction and execution==
]
Hauptmann was charged with ] and ] — conviction on even one charge could earn him the ]. He pled not guilty.

Held in ], the trial soon became a sensation: reporters swarmed the town, and every hotel room was booked.

Edward J. Reilly was hired by the '']'' to serve as Hauptmann's attorney. Reilly was a histrionic ], called "The Old Lion" to his face for his forceful personality, but called "Deathhouse Reilly" when his back was turned, since many of his clients ended up on death row. Two other lawyers, Lloyd Fisher and Frederick Pope, were co-counselors, but Reilly was in charge of the defense.

]

One of the State's first arguments was that the wood from the ladder left at the crime scene matched a plank from Hauptmann's attic: the type of wood, the direction of tree growth, the milling pattern at the factory, the inside and outside surface of the wood, and the grain on both sides were identical, and two oddly placed nail holes lined up with a joist splice in Hauptmann's attic.
Additionally, the prosecutors noted that Condon's address and telephone number had been found written in ] on a closet door in Hauptmann's home.
When it came time to introduce evidence about the tiny body discovered in the woods near the Lindbergh home, the prosecutors were cautious: they expected the defense to note that the child's own doctor had been unable to identify the remains. When Reilly rose to speak on the subject, he announced, "We concede that the corpse that was found was that of the Lindbergh baby." This admission surprised nearly everyone in the courtroom.

Condon and Lindbergh both testified, confirming that Hauptmann was Cemetery John (despite Condon's earlier insistence that Hauptmann was too small to have been the man). Amandus Hockmuth testified that he would have seen Hauptmann near the scene of the crime, but Reilly did not question Hockmuth about his ]s or his poor vision.

]
Hauptmann was ultimately convicted of the crimes and sentenced to death. His appeals were rejected, though New Jersey Governor ] granted a temporary reprieve of Hauptmann's execution, expressed doubt about the trial's fairness, and made the politically unpopular move to have the New Jersey Board of Pardons review the case.

Hauptmann turned down a $90,000 offer from a Hearst newspaper for a confession — such a large sum would have benefitted his wife and child — and refused a last-minute offer to commute his execution to a life sentence in exchange for a confession.

He was executed on ], ] in the electric chair just over four years after the kidnapping. Hauptmann's widow Anna continued to insist that he was innocent until her own death in 1994.

==Aftermath and unresolved questions==

In December 1935, The Lindberghs moved to ], partly to evade the spotlight over their first son's death.

===Questions about Hauptmann's guilt===
]
In the decades since the trial, many have argued that Hauptmann was not guilty of the crimes.

As Kurland writes, "The only thing we can be sure Hauptmann was guilty of was possession of some of the ransom money. The rest, incidentally, has never turned up. To the unbiased observer, it was never established that Hauptmann was Cemetery John; it was never established that Cemetery John was connected to the kidnapping and not just an ]ist; and it was never established that the body in the woods was that of the Lindbergh baby."

] goes even further, writing, "A review of the prosecution's evidence, coupled with FBI documents declassified in the 1990s, reveals a blatant frame up in the case."

Examples of irregularities include:

===The eyewitnesses===
Many of those who identified Hauptmann as involved in the crime have been criticized as unreliable.
*As noted above, one Lindbergh neighbor who reported Hauptmann surveilling the Lindbergh property was legally blind.
*Cab Driver Joseph Perrone (who delivered a note to Condon from Cemetery John in 1932) first insisted he was unable to identify the man who'd given him the note. Colonel Schwartzkopf described Perrone as "a totally unreliable witness." Yet by 1934, when he testified in court, Perrone firmly declared, without doubt, that Hauptmann had paid him to deliver the note.
*For more than two years, Condon insisted he had never caught more than the faintest glimpse of Cemetery John's face, and even then, the man kept to the shadows. Condon at first refused to identify Hauptmann's voice as matching Cemetery John's. However, after he was threatened with facing charges himself in connection to the crime, Condon made a quick turnaround, and asserted that Hauptmann and Cemetery John were one and the same.
*In his first interview after his encounter with Cemetery John, Lindbergh said he never got a good look at the man and that he heard the man speak only two words ("Hey, doctor!") from about 200 feet away. Yet when he testified at trial, Lindbergh's story had changed dramatically, and he identified Hauptmann as Cemetery John.

===Condon's telephone number in Hauptmann's house===
After Hauptmann's arrest, Dr. Condon's address and telephone number were found written in pencil on a closet door in Hauptmann's house. At the time, this was judged as a strong piece of evidence in favor of Hauptmann's guilt. Hauptmann himself admitted in a police interview that he had written Condon's address on the closet door: "I must have read it in the paper about the story. I was a little bit interested and keep a little bit record of it, and maybe I was just on the closet, and was reading the paper and put it down the address." When asked about Condon's telephone number, he could respond only, "I can't give you any explanation about the telephone number."

Later developments have cast doubt on this evidence. Friends and coworkers of Tom Cassidy, a New York City newspaper reporter, insisted that he had bragged often that he'd scrawled Condon's telephone number on the closet door in Hauptmann's house so that he'd have a hot story for his newspaper. Cassidy judged Hauptmann obviously guilty and considered his action only a minor indiscretion.

===Questions about the toddler's corpse===
Some have argued that the body was not in fact Lindbergh III. As noted above, the baby's own doctor was unable to identify the corpse. One other such critic was ], a self-taught ]. Unlike the bumbling "Jafsie", Parker was a seasoned professional, respected by law enforcement: he aided both New York City and State police on several murder investigations, and had delivered guest lectures to both the ] and ].

Not long after the little corpse was discovered, Parker noted several irregularities about the supposed Lindbergh Baby's remains:

*The area where the corpse was found had reportedly been thoroughly searched by state police. This raised several possibilities: perhaps the area had not been searched as thoroughly as the police insisted, or perhaps the baby had been placed there some time after the search.
*Parker thought the body was far more decomposed than it should have been even if Lindbergh III was killed on the night he was abducted.
*When measured at his last exam just a few weeks before his kidnapping, Lindbergh III had been 29 inches long. Allowing for the corpse's missing foot, it had been over 33 inches long, in Parker's opinion. It was unlikely, said Parker, that the Lindbergh child had grown four inches so quickly.

Parker speculated that ] had tired of the perpetual attention from police since the kidnapping, and had procured an infant's corpse of roughly the same age as the Lindbergh baby, then placed it in the woods near the home in an effort to put an end to the search for the baby. His suggestions seem to have been ignored by police and Lindbergh.

] notes that, as late as ], a man claimed to have been the Lindbergh baby, raised by a different family and returning in his old age. His claims were disproved after ].

===Alternate scenarios===
Given that many doubt Hauptmann's guilt, some have proposed other scenarios for the crime. Most of these are highly speculative, with little or no corroborative evidence.

*One of the more controversial theories is that Charles Lindbergh, known for playing sick practical jokes on his wife, had accidentally dropped the baby from the infamous ladder during a kidnapping prank that went terribly wrong.
*One theory claims that Charles Lindbergh himself accidentally killed his son after playing too roughly with him. This explanation points to Lindbergh's supposed refusal of an autopsy on the body and his commandeering of the investigation as evidence of foul play.
*One theory is that the ] out of Detroit did the kidnapping.
*The suicide of Lindbergh maid Violet Sharpe has been cited by some as proof of her involvement in an "inside job".
*In his 1994 book ''Lindbergh: The Crime'', ] proposed that Lindbergh's sister-in-law, Elizabeth Morrow, murdered the child due to jealousy; Lindbergh himself then concocted the kidnapping story to avoid scandal.

===Re-examination of evidence===
In 2005, the ] television program '']'' conducted a re-examination of the evidence in the kidnapping. Their investigation focused primarily on the handwriting samples and the infamous side-rail of the kidnap ladder, known as "Rail 16."

While certain comparisons of the handwriting used by the prosecution to tie the ransom notes to Hauptmann were proven false, other comparisons between Hauptmann's known handwriting and the ransom notes did apparently bear out the prosecution's claim that Hauptmann had written the notes. The notable characteristics included the tendency to write the letter N backwards, and a very distinctive and unusual capital D.

However, tying Hauptmann to the ransom notes would leave open the possibility that he had seized an opportunity to extort money only once the news was out. To tie him to the actual kidnapping, he would need to be linked to the ladder used in the crime. During the trial, prosecutors and investigators had argued that the portion of the ladder entered into evidence as "Rail 16" was part of a floorboard in Hauptmann's attic which had been cut short. A re-examination of both Rail 16 and the attic floorboard indicated that they were, in fact, part of the same original board.

Additional examination was made of photographs of the kidnap ladder from the crime scene, the day after the kidnapping (and long before Bruno Hauptmann had come up in the investigation). Several distinctive knots on "Rail 16" are visible in these photographs, which would seem to contradict the claims that the police had swapped out "Rail 16" before the trial.

In the end, the program concluded that Hauptmann had indeed been involved, though noted that this left other unresolved questions. In particular, it is still unclear how Hauptmann — with no connection to the Lindbergh family — could have had any knowledge of their last-minute change in plans, which left them in their Hopewell home that particular night.

== Books ==
There are many books written about the Lindbergh kidnapping. A complete and meticulously researched book on the affair was ''The Airman and the Carpenter'' written by ], in 1985. Kennedy was noted for three prior books where he established the innocence of wrongly convicted men. While Kennedy does not clear Hauptmann of some complicity with regard to the ransom money, he explains how some of the evidence against Hauptmann was manipulated and distorted. The most famous "error" was that a New York City detective discovered that rung from the kidnapper's ladder came from the attic in Hauptmann's home. Various experts had testified that the type of wood and grain from the attic matched the wooden rung in the ladder. Kennedy says that the ladder rung was 1/4 inch thicker than the wood purportedly taken from Hauptmann's attic and claims it could not have been taken from the attic. Kennedy also points out that Hauptmann was given several opportunities to "confess". He was offered to be given life instead of execution and one newspaper offered to give $90,000 to support his wife and child for the rest of their lives, if he would confess to them. In Kennedy's opinion, it appears that Hauptmann was a stubborn German who would rather die than confess to a crime he did not commit.

In 1999, the latest book on the Lindbergh kidnapping was published, ''The Ghosts Of Hopewell: Setting The Record Straight In The Lindbergh Case'', written by Jim Fisher, a former FBI special agent. Fisher is convinced that Hauptmann was guilty of the kidnapping and attempts to dispute the "factual errors" listed by Kennedy. Some of Fisher's points are well taken, but he errs when he notes that Lindbergh claimed to have recognized the voice of Hauptmann during an exchange of ransom money. Kennedy's research notes the ransom taker said "Hey Doc," but at the trial, the same man is said to have called "Hey Doctor" in a German accent. Lindbergh testified that was the voice of Hauptmann (spoken several years earlier). Later, some of the jurors mentioned that Lindbergh's testimony was crucial in their verdict. Fisher states (page 138) that "Colonel Lindbergh, whether you like him or not was not a liar." Fisher says "The case has become legendary and as such has become fodder for conspiracy theorists, sensationalists, and revisionists promoting their own agendas." In his view, many people think Hauptmann was innocent "Because having an innocent man to railroaded to his death by a bunch of stupid and corrupt cops is a more interesting story than the police working hard to catch the right man. A lot of people are fascinated, and comforted by, the idea of police misconduct leading to injustice. In an era where what one believes is more important than what one knows, Bruno Hauptmann can be innocent, and the Lindbergh baby alive, selling computers in Connecticut."

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* "]"
* ] (the scientific means of identifying deceased persons)
* ]

==References==
* Ahlgren, Gregory and Stephen Monier, ''Crime of the Century:The Lindbergh Kidnapping Hoax'', Branden Books, 1993, ISBN 0-8283-1971-5
* Kurland, Michael, ''A Gallery of Rogues: Portraits in True Crime'', Prentice Hall General Reference, 1994, ISBN 0-671-85011-3
* Newton, Michael, ''The Encyclopedia of Unsolved Crimes'', Checkmark Books, 2004, ISBN 0-8160-4981-5

==External links==
*
*
*
* --- dissenting views on the notorious trial
*
*


{{DEFAULTSORT:Lindbergh}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:00, 11 January 2025

Abduction and murder of Charles Lindbergh Jr. (1932)

Lindbergh kidnapping
LocationHopewell Township, New Jersey, U.S.
Coordinates40°25′26″N 74°46′04″W / 40.4240°N 74.7677°W / 40.4240; -74.7677
DateMarch 1, 1932; 92 years ago (1932-03-01)
Attack typeChild murder by head trauma, child abduction
VictimCharles Augustus Lindbergh Jr., aged 1
BurialAshes scattered in the Atlantic Ocean
MotiveInconclusive; possibly ransom
ConvictedBruno Richard Hauptmann
VerdictGuilty on all counts
Convictions
SentenceDeath by electric chair
LitigationTwo lawsuits filed by Hauptmann's wife against the state of New Jersey, arguing his innocence (both dismissed)

On March 1, 1932, Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. (born June 22, 1930), the 20-month-old son of colonel Charles Lindbergh and his wife, aviatrix and author Anne Morrow Lindbergh, was murdered after being abducted from his crib in the upper floor of the Lindberghs' home, Highfields, in East Amwell, New Jersey, United States. On May 12, the child's corpse was discovered by a truck driver by the side of a nearby road.

In September 1934, a German immigrant carpenter named Bruno Richard Hauptmann was arrested for the crime. After a trial that lasted from January 2 to February 13, 1935, he was found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. Despite his conviction, he continued to profess his innocence, but all appeals failed and he was executed in the electric chair at the New Jersey State Prison on April 3, 1936. Hauptmann's guilt or lack thereof continues to be debated in the modern day. Newspaper writer H. L. Mencken called the kidnapping and trial "the biggest story since the Resurrection". American media called it the "crime of the century"; legal scholars have referred to the trial as one of the "trials of the century". The crime spurred the U.S. Congress to pass the Federal Kidnapping Act (commonly referred to as the "Little Lindbergh Law"), which made transporting a kidnapping victim across state lines a federal crime.

Kidnapping

At approximately 9 p.m. on March 1, 1932, the Lindberghs' nurse, Betty Gow, found that 20-month-old Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. was not with his mother, Anne Morrow Lindbergh, who had just come out of the bath. Gow then alerted Charles Lindbergh who immediately went to the child's room, where he found a ransom note, containing poor handwriting and grammar, in an envelope on the windowsill. Taking a gun, Lindbergh went around the house and grounds with the family butler, Olly Whateley; they found impressions in the ground under the window of the baby's room, pieces of a wooden ladder, and a baby's blanket. Whateley telephoned the Hopewell police department while Lindbergh contacted his attorney and friend, Henry Breckinridge, and the New Jersey state police.

Investigation

An extensive search of the home and its surrounding area was conducted by police from nearby Hopewell Borough in coordination with the New Jersey State Police.

The ransom note

After midnight, a fingerprint expert examined the ransom note and ladder; no usable fingerprints or footprints were found, leading experts to conclude that the kidnapper(s) wore gloves and had some type of cloth on the soles of their shoes. No adult fingerprints were found in the baby's room, including in areas witnesses admitted to touching, such as the window, but the baby's fingerprints were found.

The brief, handwritten ransom note had many spelling and grammar irregularities:

Dear Sir! Have 50.000$ redy 25 000$ in 20$ bills 15000$ in 10$ bills and 10000$ in 5$ bills After 2–4 days we will inform you were to deliver the mony. We warn you for making anyding public or for notify the Police the child is in gut care. Indication for all letters are Singnature and 3 hohls.

At the bottom of the note were two interconnected blue circles surrounding a red circle, with a hole punched through the red circle and two more holes to the left and right.

Re-creation of the ransom note's "signature", with black dots rep­re­sent­ing punc­tures in the paper

On further examination of the ransom note by professionals, they found that it was all written by the same person. They determined that due to the odd English, the writer must have been foreign and had spent some time in the United States but little. The FBI then found a sketch artist to make a portrait of the man that they believed to be the kidnapper.

Another attempt at identifying the kidnapper was made by examining the ladder that was used in the crime to abduct the child. Police realized that while the ladder was built incorrectly, it was built by someone who knew how to construct with wood and had prior building experience. No fingerprints were found on the ladder. Slivers of the wood were examined, as the police believed that this evidence would lead to the kidnapper. They had a professional see how many different types of wood were used, what pattern was made by the nail holes and if it had been made indoors or outdoors. This was later a key element in the trial of the man who was accused of the kidnapping.

On March 2, 1932, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover contacted the Trenton New Jersey Police Department. He told the New Jersey police that they could contact the FBI for any resources and would provide any assistance if needed. The FBI did not have federal jurisdiction until May 13, 1932 when the President declared that the FBI was at the disposal of the New Jersey Police Department and that the FBI should coordinate and conduct the investigation.

The New Jersey State police offered a $25,000 reward, equivalent to $558,000 in 2023, for anyone who could provide information pertaining to the case.

On March 4, 1932 a man by the name of Gaston B. Means had a discussion with Evalyn Walsh McLean and told her that he would be of great importance in retrieving the Lindbergh baby. Means told McLean that he could find these kidnappers because he was approached weeks before the abduction about participating in a "big kidnapping" and he claimed that his friend was the kidnapper of the Lindbergh child. The following day, Means told McLean that he had made contact with the person who had the Lindbergh child. He then convinced Mrs. McLean to give him $100,000 to obtain the child because the ransom money had doubled. McLean obliged, believing that Means really knew where the child was. She waited for the child's return every day until she finally asked Means for her money back. When he refused, Mrs. McLean reported him to the police and he was sentenced to fifteen years in prison on embezzlement charges.

Violet Sharpe, who was suspected as a conspirator, died by suicide on June 10, before she was scheduled to be questioned for the fourth time. Her involvement was later ruled out due to her having an alibi for the night of March 1, 1932.

In October 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt announced that the Federal Bureau of Investigation would take jurisdiction over the case.

Prominence

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Lindbergh kidnapping" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Aerial view of the Lindbergh estate in 1932

Word of the kidnapping spread quickly. Hundreds of people converged on the estate, destroying any footprint evidence. Along with police, well-connected and well-intentioned people arrived at the Lindbergh estate. Military colonels offered their aid, although only one had law enforcement expertise – Herbert Norman Schwarzkopf, superintendent of the New Jersey State Police. The other colonels were Henry Skillman Breckinridge, a Wall Street lawyer; and William J. Donovan, a hero of the First World War who later headed the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. Lindbergh and these men speculated that the kidnapping was perpetrated by organized crime figures. They thought that the letter was written by someone who spoke German as his native language. At this time, Charles Lindbergh used his influence to control the direction of the investigation.

They contacted Mickey Rosner, a Broadway hanger-on rumored to know mobsters. Rosner turned to two speakeasy owners, Salvatore "Salvy" Spitale and Irving Bitz, for aid. Lindbergh quickly endorsed the duo and appointed them his intermediaries to deal with the mob. Several organized crime figures – notably Al Capone, Willie Moretti, Joe Adonis, and Abner Zwillman – spoke from prison, offering to help return the baby in exchange for money or for legal favors. Specifically, Capone offered assistance in return for being released from prison under the pretense that his assistance would be more effective. This was quickly denied by the authorities.

New Jersey State Police Superintendent Norman Schwarzkopf Sr.

The morning after the kidnapping, authorities notified President Herbert Hoover of the crime. At that time, kidnapping was classified as a state crime and the case did not seem to have any grounds for federal involvement. Attorney General William D. Mitchell met with Hoover and announced that the whole machinery of the Department of Justice would be set in motion to cooperate with the New Jersey authorities.

The Bureau of Investigation (later the FBI) was authorized to investigate the case, while the United States Coast Guard, the U.S. Customs Service, the U.S. Immigration Service and the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia were told their services might be required. New Jersey officials announced a $25,000 reward for the safe return of "Little Lindy". The Lindbergh family offered an additional $50,000 reward of their own. At this time, the total reward of $75,000 (approximately $1,801,000 in 2024) was a tremendous sum of money, because the nation was in the midst of the Great Depression.

On March 6, a new ransom letter arrived by mail at the Lindbergh home. The letter was postmarked March 4 in Brooklyn, and it carried the perforated red and blue marks. The ransom had been raised to $70,000. A third ransom note postmarked from Brooklyn, and also including the secret marks, arrived in Breckinridge's mail. The note told the Lindberghs that John Condon should be the intermediary between the Lindberghs and the kidnapper(s), and requested notification in a newspaper that the third note had been received. Instructions specified the size of the box the money should come in, and warned the family not to contact the police.

John Condon

During this time, John F. Condon – a well-known Bronx personality and retired school teacher – offered $1,000 if the kidnapper would turn the child over to a Catholic priest. Condon received a letter reportedly written by the kidnappers; it authorized Condon to be their intermediary with Lindbergh. Lindbergh accepted the letter as genuine.

Following the kidnapper's latest instructions, Condon placed a classified ad in the New York American reading: "Money is Ready. Jafsie." Condon then waited for further instructions from the culprits.

A meeting between "Jafsie" and a representative of the group that claimed to be the kidnappers was eventually scheduled for late one evening at Woodlawn Cemetery in the Bronx. According to Condon, the man sounded foreign but stayed in the shadows during the conversation, and Condon was thus unable to get a close look at his face. The man said his name was John, and he related his story: He was a "Scandinavian" sailor, part of a gang of three men and two women. The baby was being held on a boat, unharmed, but would be returned only for ransom. When Condon expressed doubt that "John" actually had the baby, he promised some proof: the kidnapper would soon return the baby's sleeping suit. The stranger asked Condon, "... would I burn if the package were dead?" When questioned further, he assured Condon that the baby was alive.

On March 16, Condon received a toddler's sleeping suit by mail, and a seventh ransom note. After Lindbergh identified the sleeping suit, Condon placed a new ad in the Home News: "Money is ready. No cops. No secret service. I come alone, like last time." On April 1 Condon received a letter saying it was time for the ransom to be delivered.

Ransom payment

The ransom was packaged in a wooden box that was custom-made in the hope that it could later be identified. The ransom money included a number of gold certificates; since gold certificates were about to be withdrawn from circulation, it was hoped greater attention would be drawn to anyone spending them. The bills were not marked but their serial numbers were recorded. Some sources credit this idea to Frank J. Wilson, others to Elmer Lincoln Irey.

On April 2, Condon was given a note by an intermediary, an unknown cab driver. Condon met "John" and told him that they had been able to raise only $50,000. The man accepted the money and gave Condon a note saying that the child was in the care of two innocent women.

Discovery of the body

An illustration of Charles Jr. on the cover of Time magazine on May 2, 1932

On May 12, delivery truck driver Orville Wilson and his assistant William Allen pulled to the side of a road about 4.5 miles (7.2 km) south of the Lindbergh home near the hamlet of Mount Rose in neighboring Hopewell Township. When Allen went into a grove of trees to urinate, he discovered the body of a toddler. The skull was badly fractured and the body decomposed, with evidence of scavenging by animals; there were indications of an attempt at a hasty burial. Gow identified the baby as the missing infant from the overlapping toes of the right foot and a shirt that she had made. It appeared the child had been killed by a blow to the head. Lindbergh insisted on cremation.

In June 1932, officials began to suspect that the crime had been perpetrated by someone the Lindberghs knew. Suspicion fell upon Violet Sharpe, a British household servant at the Morrow home who had given contradictory information regarding her whereabouts on the night of the kidnapping. It was reported that she appeared nervous and suspicious when questioned. She died by suicide on June 10, 1932, by ingesting a silver polish that contained cyanide just before being questioned for the fourth time. Her alibi was later confirmed, and police were criticized for heavy-handedness.

Condon was also questioned by police and his home searched, but nothing incriminating was found. Charles Lindbergh stood by Condon during this time.

John Condon's unofficial investigation

After the discovery of the body, Condon remained unofficially involved in the case. To the public, he had become a suspect and in some circles was vilified. For the next two years, he visited police departments and pledged to find "Cemetery John".

Condon's actions regarding the case were increasingly flamboyant. On one occasion, while riding a city bus, Condon claimed that he saw a suspect on the street and, announcing his secret identity, ordered the bus to stop. The startled driver complied and Condon darted from the bus, although his target eluded him. Condon's actions were also criticized as exploitive when he agreed to appear in a vaudeville act regarding the kidnapping. Liberty magazine published a serialized account of Condon's involvement in the Lindbergh kidnapping under the title "Jafsie Tells All".

Tracking the ransom money

A 1928 series $10 gold certificate

The investigators who were working on the case were soon at a standstill. There were no developments and little evidence of any sort, so police turned their attention to tracking the ransom payments. A pamphlet was prepared with the serial numbers on the ransom bills, and 250,000 copies were distributed to businesses, mainly in New York City. A few of the ransom bills appeared in scattered locations, some as far away as Chicago and Minneapolis, but those spending the bills were never found.

By a presidential order, all gold certificates were to be exchanged for other bills by May 1, 1933. A few days before the deadline, a man brought $2,980 to a Manhattan bank for exchange; it was later realized the bills were from the ransom. He had given his name as J. J. Faulkner of 537 West 149th Street. No one named Faulkner lived at that address, and a Jane Faulkner who had lived there 20 years earlier denied involvement.

Arrest of Hauptmann

Main article: Richard Hauptmann

During a thirty-month period, a number of the ransom bills were spent throughout New York City. Detectives realized that many of the bills were being spent along the route of the Lexington Avenue subway, which connected the Bronx with the east side of Manhattan, including the German-Austrian neighborhood of Yorkville.

On September 18, 1934, a Manhattan bank teller noticed a gold certificate from the ransom; a New York license plate number (4U-13-41-N.Y) penciled in the bill's margin allowed it to be traced to a nearby gas station. The station manager had written down the license number because his customer was acting "suspicious" and was "possibly a counterfeiter". The license plate belonged to a sedan owned by Richard Hauptmann of 1279 East 222nd Street in the Bronx, an immigrant with a criminal record in Germany. When Hauptmann was arrested, he was carrying a single 20-dollar gold certificate and over $14,000 of the ransom money was found in his garage.

Hauptmann was arrested, interrogated, and beaten at least once throughout the following day and night. Hauptmann stated that the money and other items had been left with him by his friend and former business partner Isidor Fisch. Fisch had died on March 29, 1934, shortly after returning to Germany. Hauptmann stated he learned only after Fisch's death that the shoebox that was left with him contained a considerable sum of money. He kept the money because he claimed that it was owed to him from a business deal that he and Fisch had made. Hauptmann consistently denied any connection to the crime or knowledge that the money in his house was from the ransom.

When the police searched Hauptmann's home, they found a considerable amount of additional evidence that linked him to the crime. One item was a notebook that contained a sketch of the construction of a ladder similar to that which was found at the Lindbergh home in March 1932. John Condon's telephone number, along with his address, were discovered written on a closet wall in the house. A key piece of evidence, a section of wood, was discovered in the attic of the home. After being examined by an expert, it was determined to be an exact match to the wood used in the construction of the ladder found at the scene of the crime.

Hauptmann was indicted in the Bronx on September 24, 1934, for extorting the $50,000 ransom from Charles Lindbergh. Two weeks later, on October 8, Hauptmann was indicted in New Jersey for the murder of Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. Two days later, he was surrendered to New Jersey authorities by New York Governor Herbert H. Lehman to face charges directly related to the kidnapping and murder of the child. Hauptmann was moved to the Hunterdon County Jail in Flemington, New Jersey, on October 19.

Trial and execution

Trial

Lindbergh testifying at Hauptmann's trial. Hauptmann is in half-profile at right.

Hauptmann was charged with capital murder. The trial was held at the Hunterdon County Courthouse in Flemington, New Jersey, and was soon dubbed the "Trial of the Century". Reporters swarmed the town, and every hotel room was booked. Judge Thomas Whitaker Trenchard presided over the trial.

In exchange for rights to publish Hauptmann's story in their newspaper, Edward J. Reilly was hired by the New York Daily Mirror to serve as Hauptmann's attorney. David T. Wilentz, Attorney General of New Jersey, led the prosecution.

Evidence against Hauptmann included $20,000 of the ransom money found in his garage and testimony alleging that his handwriting and spelling were similar to those of the ransom notes. Eight handwriting experts, including Albert S. Osborn, pointed out similarities between the ransom notes and Hauptmann's writing specimens. The defense called an expert to rebut this evidence, while two others declined to testify; the latter two demanded $500 before looking at the notes and were dismissed when Lloyd Fisher, a member of Hauptmann's legal team, declined. Other experts retained by the defense were never called to testify.

On the basis of the work of Arthur Koehler at the Forest Products Laboratory, the State introduced photographs demonstrating that part of the wood from the ladder matched a plank from the floor of Hauptmann's attic: the type of wood, the direction of tree growth, the milling pattern, the inside and outside surface of the wood, and the grain on both sides were identical, and four oddly placed nail holes lined up with nail holes in joists in Hauptmann's attic. Condon's address and telephone number were written in pencil on a closet door in Hauptmann's home, and Hauptmann told police that he had written Condon's address:

I must have read it in the paper about the story. I was a little bit interested and keep a little bit record of it, and maybe I was just on the closet, and was reading the paper and put it down the address ... I can't give you any explanation about the telephone number.

A sketch that Wilentz suggested represented a ladder was found in one of Hauptmann's notebooks. Hauptmann said this picture and other sketches therein were the work of a child.

Despite not having an obvious source of earned income, Hauptmann had bought a $400 radio (approximately equivalent to $9,110 in 2023) and sent his wife on a trip to Germany.

Hauptmann was identified as the man to whom the ransom money was delivered. Other witnesses testified that it was Hauptmann who had spent some of the Lindbergh gold certificates; that he had been seen in the area of the estate, in East Amwell, New Jersey, near Hopewell, on the day of the kidnapping; and that he had been absent from work on the day of the ransom payment and had quit his job two days later. Hauptmann never sought another job afterward, yet continued to live comfortably.

When the prosecution rested its case, the defense opened with a lengthy examination of Hauptmann. In his testimony, Hauptmann denied being guilty, insisting that the box of gold certificates had been left in his garage by a friend, Isidor Fisch, who had returned to Germany in December 1933 and died there in March 1934. Hauptmann said that he had one day found a shoe box left behind by Fisch, which Hauptmann had stored on the top shelf of his kitchen broom closet, later discovering the money, which he later found to be almost $40,000 (approximately equivalent to $713,000 in 2023). Hauptmann said that, because Fisch had owed him about $7,500 in business funds, Hauptmann had kept the money for himself and had lived on it since January 1934.

The defense called Hauptmann's wife, Anna, to corroborate the Fisch story. On cross-examination, she admitted that while she hung her apron every day on a hook higher than the top shelf, she could not remember seeing any shoe box there. Later, rebuttal witnesses testified that Fisch could not have been at the scene of the crime, and that he had no money for medical treatments when he died of tuberculosis. Fisch's landlady testified that he could barely afford the $3.50 weekly rent of his room.

In his closing summation, Reilly argued that the evidence against Hauptmann was entirely circumstantial, because no reliable witness had placed Hauptmann at the scene of the crime, nor were his fingerprints found on the ladder, on the ransom notes, or anywhere in the nursery.

Appeals

Hauptmann was convicted on February 13, 1935, and immediately sentenced to death. His attorneys appealed to the New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals, which at the time was the state's highest court; the appeal was argued on June 29, 1935.

New Jersey Governor Harold G. Hoffman secretly visited Hauptmann in his cell on the evening of October 16, accompanied by a stenographer who spoke German fluently. Hoffman urged members of the Court of Errors and Appeals to visit Hauptmann.

In late January 1936, while declaring that he held no position on the guilt or innocence of Hauptmann, Hoffman cited evidence that the crime was not a "one person" job and directed Schwarzkopf to continue a thorough and impartial investigation in an effort to bring all parties involved to justice.

It became known among the press that on March 27, Hoffman was considering a second reprieve of Hauptmann's death sentence and was seeking opinions about whether the governor had the right to issue a second reprieve.

On March 30, 1936, Hauptmann's second and final appeal asking for clemency from the New Jersey Board of Pardons was denied. Hoffman later announced that this decision would be the final legal action in the case, and that he would not grant another reprieve. Nonetheless, there was a postponement, when the Mercer County grand jury, investigating the confession and arrest of Trenton attorney, Paul Wendel, requested a delay from Warden Mark Kimberling. This, the final stay, ended when the Mercer County prosecutor informed Kimberling that the grand jury had adjourned after voting to end its investigation without charging Wendel.

Execution

Hauptmann turned down a large offer from a Hearst newspaper for a confession and refused a last-minute offer to commute his sentence from the death penalty to life without parole in exchange for a confession. He was executed by the electric chair on April 3, 1936.

After his death, some reporters and independent investigators came up with numerous questions about the way in which the investigation had been run and the fairness of the trial, including witness tampering and planted evidence. Twice in the 1980s, Anna Hauptmann sued the state of New Jersey for the unjust execution of her husband. The suits were dismissed due to prosecutorial immunity and because the statute of limitations had run out. She continued fighting to clear his name until her death, at age 95, in 1994.

Alternative theories

A number of books have asserted Hauptmann's innocence, generally highlighting inadequate police work at the crime scene, Lindbergh's interference in the investigation, the ineffectiveness of Hauptmann's counsel, and weaknesses in the witnesses and physical evidence. Ludovic Kennedy, in particular, questioned much of the evidence, such as the origin of the ladder and the testimony of many of the witnesses.

According to author Lloyd Gardner, a fingerprint expert, Erastus Mead Hudson, applied the then-rare silver nitrate fingerprint process to the ladder and did not find Hauptmann's fingerprints, even in places that the maker of the ladder must have touched. According to Gardner, officials refused to consider this expert's findings, and the ladder was then washed of all fingerprints.

Jim Fisher, a former FBI agent and professor at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, has written two books, The Lindbergh Case (1987) and The Ghosts of Hopewell (1999), addressing what he calls a "revision movement" regarding the case. He summarizes:

Today, the Lindbergh phenomena [sic] is a giant hoax perpetrated by people who are taking advantage of an uninformed and cynical public. Notwithstanding all of the books, TV programs, and legal suits, Hauptmann is as guilty today as he was in 1932 when he kidnapped and killed the son of Mr. and Mrs. Charles Lindbergh.

Another book, Hauptmann's Ladder: A Step-by-Step Analysis of the Lindbergh Kidnapping by Richard T. Cahill Jr., concludes that Hauptmann was guilty but questions whether he should have been executed.

According to John Reisinger in Master Detective, New Jersey detective Ellis Parker conducted an independent investigation in 1936 and obtained a signed confession from former Trenton attorney Paul Wendel, creating a sensation and resulting in a temporary stay of execution for Hauptmann. The case against Wendel collapsed, however, when he insisted his confession had been coerced.

Robert Zorn's 2012 book Cemetery John proposes that Hauptmann was part of a conspiracy with two other German-born men, John and Walter Knoll. Zorn's father, economist Eugene Zorn, believed that as a teenager he had witnessed the conspiracy being discussed.

In popular culture

Record label of "Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr." by Bob Ferguson

In novels

  • 1934: Agatha Christie was inspired by circumstances of the case when she described the kidnapping of Daisy Armstrong in her Hercule Poirot novel Murder on the Orient Express.
  • 1981: The kidnapping and its aftermath served as the inspiration for Maurice Sendak's book Outside Over There.
  • 1991: Max Allan Collins's novel Stolen Away, fifth in his Nathan Heller series, in which the fictional private eye gets involved in real historical mysteries and meets historical figures, Heller gets involved in investigating the Lindbergh kidnapping, interviews psychic Edgar Cayce, and decades later meets a man whom they both believe to be the kidnapped and never returned Charles Lindbergh, Jr., having been raised and lived his whole life under another name. It won the 1992 Shamus Award for best hardcover private eye novel.
  • 1993: In the novel Along Came a Spider by James Patterson and the film based on the novel, a character takes inspiration from the Lindbergh kidnapping for his crime.
  • 2013: The Aviator's Wife by Melanie Benjamin is a work of historical fiction told from the perspective of Anne Morrow Lindbergh.
  • 2022: The Lindbergh Nanny by Mariah Fredericks is a work of historical fiction told from the perspective of Betty Gow.

In music

  • May 1932: Just one day after the Lindbergh baby was discovered murdered, the prolific country recording artist Bob Miller (under the pseudonym Bob Ferguson) recorded two songs for Columbia on May 13, 1932, commemorating the event. The songs were released on Columbia 15759-D with the titles "Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr." and "There's a New Star Up in Heaven (Baby Lindy Is Up There)".

In film

In television

See also

Explanatory notes

  1. In some sources, spelled as Violet Sharp
  2. "Jafsie" was a pseudonym based on a phonetic pronunciation of Condon's initials, "J.F.C."

General and cited references

Citations

  1. Gill, Barbara (1981). "Lindbergh kidnapping rocked the world 50 years ago". The Hunterdon County Democrat. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 30 December 2008. So while the world's attention was focused on Hopewell, from which the first press dispatches emanated about the kidnapping, the Democrat made sure its readers knew that the new home of Col. Charles A. Lindbergh and Anne Morrow Lindbergh was in East Amwell Township, Hunterdon County.
  2. ^ Aiuto, Russell. "The Theft of the Eaglet". The Lindbergh Kidnapping. TruTv. Archived from the original on 17 October 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  3. ^ "Lindbergh Kidnapping Index". Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  4. ^ Linder, Douglas (2005). "The Trial of Richard "Bruno" Hauptmann: An Account". University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. Archived from the original on 9 July 2009. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  5. Notorious Murders Archived March 8, 2014, at the Wayback Machine; CrimeLibrary.com; accessed August 2015
  6. Newton, Michael (2012). The FBI Encyclopedia. North Carolina, US: McFarland. p. 197. ISBN 978-0-7864-6620-7. Archived from the original on 4 February 2017. Retrieved 9 August 2012.
  7. Bailey, Frankie Y.; Chermak, Steven (2007). Crimes and Trials of the Century [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 167. ISBN 978-1-57356-973-6.
  8. Glass, Andrew (26 March 2007). "This Day on Capitol Hill: February 13". The Politico. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  9. Cahill, Richard T. Jr. (2014). Hauptmann's Ladder. Kent State University. pp. 7–8.
  10. ^ Cahill, Richard T. Jr. (2014). Hauptmann's Ladder. Kent State University. pp. 7–8.
  11. Lindbergh by A. Scott Berg
  12. Zorn, Robert (2012). Cemetery John: The Undiscovered Mastermind of the Lindbergh Kidnapping. The Overlook Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-1590208564.
  13. Horan, James J. (October 1, 1983). "The Investigation of the Lindbergh Kidnapping Case". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 28 (4): 1040–1043. doi:10.1520/jfs11620j. ISSN 0022-1198.
  14. Gardner, Lloyd (2004). The case that never dies : the Lindbergh kidnapping. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-6063-2. OCLC 793996630.
  15. "Fellow Servants Say Violet Hysterical Prior to Suicide". Buffalo Evening News. June 11, 1932. p. 1 – via newspapers.com.
  16. "Waitress Under Constant Suspicion". The Morning Call. Paterson, New Jersey. June 11, 1932. p. 2 – via newspapers.com.
  17. ^ Lindbergh, Anne (1973). Hour of Gold, Hour of Lead. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. ISBN 978-0151421763.
  18. Cahill, Richard T. Jr. (2014). Hauptmann's Ladder. Kent State University. p. 16.
  19. Fass, Paula S. (1997). "Chapter 3: "The nation's child ... is dead": The Lindbergh case". Kidnapped: Child Abduction in America. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0195311419. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  20. "Federal Aid In Hunt Ordered By Hoover". The New York Times. 3 March 1932. Retrieved 18 December 2016.
  21. Aiuto, Russell. "Parallel Threads, Continued". The Lindbergh Kidnapping. TruTv. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  22. Maeder, Jay (23 September 1999). "Half Dream Jafsie". Daily News. Archived from the original on 10 July 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  23. ^ "The Lindbergh Kidnapping". FBI History – Famous Cases. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Archived from the original on 18 September 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2009.
  24. ^ Manning, Lona (4 March 2007). "The Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping". Crime Magazine. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  25. Eig, Jonathan (2010). Get Capone: The secret plot that captured America's most wanted gangster. Simon and Schuster. p. 372. ISBN 978-1439199893.
  26. Waller, George (1961). Kidnap: The story of the Lindbergh case. Dial Press. p. 71.
  27. Folsom, Robert G. (2010). The Money Trail: How Elmer Irey and his T-men brought down America's criminal elite. Potomac Books. pp. 217–219.
  28. ^ "Crime: Never-to-be-Forgotten". Time. 23 May 1932. Archived from the original on 16 November 2007. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  29. "Murdered child's body now reduced to pile of ashes". The Evening Independent. 14 May 1932.
  30. "The Lindbergh Kidnapping". UK: The Biography Channel. Archived from the original on 10 July 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  31. "The Lindbergh Kidnapping". The Biography Channel UK. Archived from the original on 10 July 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  32. "Lindbergh Baby Booty". New York Press. 11 March 2003. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  33. "Ministers protest billing of Condon; 25 see Jafsie Vaudeville Act scheduled for Plainfield as tragic exploitation". The New York Times. 5 January 1936. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  34. "Milestones Jan. 15, 1945". Time Magazine. 15 January 1945. Archived from the original on 12 July 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  35. Woolley, John; Peters, Gerhard. "Executive Order 6102 – Requiring Gold Coin, Gold Bullion and Gold Certificates to be Delivered to the Government April 5, 1933". The American Presidency Project. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  36. "National Affairs: 4U-13-41". Time Magazine. 1 October 1934. Archived from the original on 16 November 2007. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  37. "National Affairs Oct. 8, 1934". Time Magazine. 8 October 1934. Archived from the original on 12 July 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
  38. "Ladder – Crime of the Century". crimeofthecentury.weebly.com. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
  39. "The Kidnapping". PBS. Archived from the original on 26 September 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2011.
  40. Ahlgren, Gregory; Monier, Stephen; Caso, Adolph (2009). Caso, Adolph (ed.). Crime of the Century: The Lindbergh kidnapping hoax. Branden Books.
  41. ^ Fisher, Jim (1994). The Lindbergh Case. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-2147-3.
  42. "'Trial of the Century' over Lindbergh baby murder commemorated in new portraits". 4 December 2011. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  43. Gardner, Lloyd C. (2004). The Case That Never Dies. Rutgers University Press. p. 336. ISBN 978-0-8135-3385-8.
  44. Farr, Julia (1935). Letter from Julia Farr to Lloyd Fisher. New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives.
  45. Schrager, Adam (2013). The Sixteenth Rail: The Evidence, the Scientist, and the Lindbergh Kidnapping. Fulcrum Publishing. ISBN 978-1-55591-716-6.
  46. Ross, Amanda T. (31 March 2009). "CSI Madison, Wisconsin: Wooden Witness". Forest History Society.
  47. The State of New Jersey vs. Bruno Richard Hauptmann. Hunterdon County Court of Oyer and Termner. Vol. 5. New Jersey State Law Library. 1935. p. 2606.
  48. James, Bill (2011). "". Popular Crime. pp. 147–161.
  49. The State of New Jersey vs. Bruno Richard Hauptmann. Hunterdon County Court of Oyer and Termner. Vol. 11. New Jersey State Law Library. 1935. pp. 4687–4788.
  50. Lutz, William (c. 1937). Plain Facts about the Hauptmann Case. New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives.
  51. Hoffman, Harold Giles (26 January 1936). Letter from Governor Hoffman to Colonel H. Norman Schwarzkopf. New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives.
  52. "Hoffman seeks reprieve advice". The Daily Princetonian. Princeton University Library. March 28, 1936.
  53. Herman, Albert B., Clerk of the Board of Pardons (March 30, 1936). "Board of Pardons Press Release". New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. Blackman, Samuel G. (31 March 1936). "Pardons court again denies Hauptmann plea and governor declares "No reprieve"". The Titusville Herald.
  55. Porter, Russell B. (1 April 1936). "Hauptmann gets a stay for at least 48 hours at grand jury request". The New York Times.
  56. Marshall, Erwin E., Prosecutor of the Pleas (3 April 1936). Letter from Erwin Marshall to Colonel Mark O. Kimberling. New Jersey State Police Museum and Learning Center Archives.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  57. Los Angeles Times (October 20, 1994). "Anna Hauptmann; Wife of Man Convicted in Lindbergh Murder". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 26, 2021. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  58. "Hauptmann's Widow Dies". The New York Times. October 19, 1994. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 26, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  59. Gardner, Lloyd G. (2004). The case that never dies. Rutgers University Press. p. 344. ISBN 978-0813554471.
  60. Fisher, Jim. "Biography". Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved April 29, 2011.
  61. Fisher, Jim (1994) . The Lindbergh Case. Rutgers University Press. p. 480. ISBN 0-8135-2147-5.
  62. Fisher, Jim (1999). The Ghosts of Hopewell: Setting the Record Straight in the Lindbergh Case. Southern Illinois Univ Press. p. 224. ISBN 0-8093-2285-4.
  63. Fisher, Jim. "The Lindbergh Case: A Look Back to the Future". p. 3. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2011. For the Lindbergh case, the revisionist movement began in 1976 with the publication of a book by a tabloid reporter named Anthony Scaduto. In Scapegoat, Scaduto asserts that the Lindbergh baby was not murdered and that Hauptmann was the victim of a mass conspiracy of prosecution, perjury and fabricated physical evidence.
  64. Fisher, Jim. "The Lindbergh Case: How can such a guilty kidnapper be so innocent?". p. 3. Retrieved April 29, 2011.
  65. Williams, David (April 3, 2014). "'Hauptmann's Ladder' revisits crime". Courier Journal. Archived from the original on January 10, 2025. Retrieved January 10, 2025.
  66. Reisinger, John (February 2012). Master Detective – Americas Real-life Sherlock. Glyphworks. ISBN 978-0983881827.
  67. Colimore, Edward (8 July 2012). "Tale of a Lindbergh conspiracy draws attention". The Inquirer. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014. Retrieved 19 August 2012.
  68. Jim Fisher (1994). The Lindbergh Case: A Story of Two Lives. Rutgers University Press. p. 249. ISBN 978-0813521473.
  69. Haase, Donald, ed. (1996). The Reception of Grimms' Fairy Tales: Responses, reactions, revisions. Wayne State University Press. p. 209. ISBN 978-0814322086. In it, I am the Lindbergh baby.
  70. "The Private Eye Writers of America".
  71. "Extract: Along Came A Spider by James Patterson". Dead Good. April 26, 2017. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  72. Mitchell, Elvis (April 6, 2001). "Film Review; Weaving an Intricate Web To Trap a Wily Kidnapper". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  73. "The Aviators Wife". Penguin Random House.
  74. "The Lindbergh Nanny". Macmillan Publishers.
  75. Russell, Tony (2004). Country music records: a discography, 1921–1942. US: Oxford University Press. p. 621. ISBN 978-0-19-513989-1.

External links

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Field offices
Organization
Criminal, Cyber, Response,
and Services Branch
Human Resources Branch
National Security Branch
Science and Technology Branch
Other branches
Technology
Ranks
Methods and
activities
People
Buildings
Related
OtherHogan's Alley
Lindbergh kidnapping
People
Media
Anne Morrow Lindbergh
Works
Related
Charles Lindbergh
Aircraft
Works
Personal life
In culture
Categories: