Revision as of 18:34, 12 February 2007 editOrangemonster2k1 (talk | contribs)3,549 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 August 2009 edit undoRobofish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,579 edits AfD nomination of Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case. (TW) | ||
(279 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
==Calton== | |||
Don't give up just yet. There is two seperate conversations going on about Calton...one, a RfC and another an arbitration . Why not add your current situation with Calton to one or both of those. The more people who let their voices be heard the better the chance that Calton might get his tune changed. - ] <sup>(] - ])</sup> 17:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Hmm, a soul mate for you, Gordon, someone as equally clueless about Misplaced Pages policy. | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
:And speaking of not knowing Misplaced Pages policy -- or simple directions, as seen at the top of ]: | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 22:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
:''This page is for discussion '''about the village pump''' only. You may want one of the village pump subpages below, or one of the links on the village pump main page. Irrelevant discussions will be moved or removed.'' | |||
:--] | ] 17:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
::The second one is an arbitration between him and DeanHinnen on "Free Republic". Not sure what it is about. - ] <sup>(] - ])</sup> 18:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
I'm sorry, Gordon. I'd like to support you because I always find it painful to see a situation where ''everyone'' seems to be against one person. But I've looked at your links, and I do think you have a conflict of interest and that they don't fit in with all the ], ], ] policies or guidelines that I have been reading. Also, I think it's a really bad idea to call someone else's edit "vandalism" in a content dispute. Vandalism is when someone changes the image of Pope Benedict to Michael Jackson, inserts dirty words into articles, blanks large sections, or deliberately inserts false information (like Adolf Hitler was born in 1482). It's not vandalism when someone removes a link on the grounds that it's not reliable, regardless of how long that link has been there. Please give up this fight, because I have a feeling it will get very painful for you if you don't. ] 18:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Well, I've decided an even bettr route: To NOT fight at all, but rahter to let the Lord fight my battle - I've made my case, and I trust God to let the chips fall where they may: I've followed the proper protocal on how to address this matter, and that, in and of itself, is a positive result.--] 18:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 August 2009
Redirect to:
Articles for deletion nomination of Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case
I have nominated Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)