| Revision as of 20:21, 14 February 2007 editTJ Spyke (talk | contribs)93,344 edits →3RR: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:24, 20 January 2024 edit undoUtopes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,774 edits Notification: listing of It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| {{archive box|*]<br> | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | |||
| *]<br> | |||
| |- | |||
| *]<br> | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ]. Archives prior to February 10, 2008 (Archive 16) were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived. | |||
| *]<br> | |||
| |- | |||
| *] | |||
| |} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| |counter=31 | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archive box|auto=long}} | |||
| {{Boxboxtop|}} | |||
| {{User MAW400}} | |||
| {{Boxboxbottom}} | |||
| </small> | |||
| == Help == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I don't understand why you left a vandalism template on my talk page. I was only removing your UNSOURCED match (which is only really 1/2 of a match.) All you have to do is wait for the end of RAW, what's the big hurry? ] <small>(])</small> 02:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :How is it unsourced? They just announced it on international TV. ] 02:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help. | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Slamboree 95.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| == WikiCup 2010 June newsletter == | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 18:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:GAB 00.JPG)== | |||
| We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Ian Rose}} (A), {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Sturmvogel_66}} (B, and the round's overall leader), {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|ThinkBlue}} (C) {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Casliber}} and {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|TonyTheTiger}} (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at ], and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the ]. | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the ]- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself. | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 18:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at ] and ]. Our thanks go to {{Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Participant|Stone}} for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! <small>If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from ].</small> ], ] and ] | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:NYR 05.JPG)== | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0055 --> | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 19:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| ==Shadowclan Sockpuppets== | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| This article seems to have many sockpuppets supporting it and will not allow another AFD. "shadowclan" is an online gaming guild not notable. ] 01:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. | |||
| |} | |||
| ==May 2013== | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wii Play.jpg)== | |||
| <!-- ] 03:14, 19 January 2038 (UTC) --> | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for persistent ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] ] 20:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=I understand why I was blocked, and why some people don't think my edits (which never actually harmed articles, and actually improve them. And it annoyed me when a editor would revert the WHOLE edit instead of just the parts they feel were against the rules) were just beneficial to the site. I think enough time has passed that I have been able to reflect on it and change. I just want to be able to work on articles again and improve them, and will do my best not to violate the rules. I was actually working with an editor about making proposals to update the rules with common sense changes. I don't want to break any rules or be disruptive, I just want to be able to help and will do whatever I am asked to get my ban lifted. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 19:54, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | decline=I don't find this request particularly compelling, I think the best way forward would be if you indicated if you would be willing to abide by the conditions proposed below and them post a new unblock request. ] (]) 20:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 02:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi TJ. In the future, there are bound to be things that will annoy you again; wikipedia is big, there are people that are somewhat annoying, and a text-only medium as wikipedia is bound to provide misunderstandings that might also annoy you. You have a history of literally years of ANI threads and blocks. Your past behavior around problematic behavior and blocks have seemed to have been, ignore people who point out problems in your behaviour, and when it comes to blocks to just sit them out, and not changing anything in your behaviour. From your request here, what I read is that you say you understand you deserved it, but really you were doing the right thing. It should be obvious from your block log now that it is not. So you now say you will be doing your best not to break the rules, but you said that before, and it didn't work out. I really can't see how it is any different now, and any effective unblock request should address that. ] (]) 20:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Although I know my edits were good and helpful, I understand that the admins in charge don't want those edits. So I would just avoid making those edits. I would try to get the community to adopt policy changes for stuff that would improve articles (and maybe stem the tide of editors leaving), but would follow the rules in place. I have improved in the past, like how I stopped engaging in edit wars (a problem I had early), so I can change and get better. I just want a chance to show I can do better, I have been a very good editor (I was one of the primary editors that got the ] article to FA status) and my only problems are that fixing redirects is frowned upon. Even though it is just plain silly to be not allowed, I will abide by it. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::As a piece of friendly advice: Just avoid changing redirects altogether. Don't "fix" them for any reason. They are obviously a weak spot in your editing history and I have very little confidence that you even understand the community rules in this area. The ] shows that you've been making changes like this several times per month even since your current block was put in place. Not all are bad, but several clearly violate ]. I don't think you have any self control when it comes to "fixing" redirects, so if you're allowed back from this third indef block, you should really resist the temptation to touch any redirects at all. -] (]) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :To the reviewing admin: If you are interested in restoring TJ Spyke's access, I'd strongly recommend that it be a conditional unblock based on a firm commitment by TJ Spyke to leave all redirects entirely alone from now on. And obviously he'd need to be monitored for a period to ensure his compliance. He's not a ''worthless'' editor by any means, but the problems he does have are utterly intractable in my opinion. The only way to control the issue would be to impose zero tolerance for his redirect "fixing" behavior. -] (]) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::What would be considered leaving all redirects alone? For example, would fixing a link from "Wrestlemania" to "WrestleMania" violate it? Or "North America Eastern Time Zone" to "Eastern Time Zone"? I.e. would I have to avoid changing any links, or what? Assuming I do get unblocked. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Any unblock would be basically under probation. You seem quite capable of finding new and novel ways to do stuff that the community either doesn't want happening, or currently doesn't want you to do. I would like to discuss with your blocking admin and ANI the following unblock conditions: | |||
| :::#You are banned from changing the target of any wikilink for a year. If you would want to change <nowiki>]</nowiki> to WrestleMania, you'll use a piped link that conserves the target as in <nowiki>]</nowiki> | |||
| :::#You will observe a 1 revert rule for six months | |||
| :::#For the duration of a year, any administrator can unilaterally place you under a topic ban for ''any'' topic and any length up to six months. In case you believe that a specific topic ban isn't justified, you may request the topic ban lifted on ANI. The topic ban will remain in effect until the discussion on ANI is closed as not to uphold the topic ban. You will not request revocation of a topic ban for 30 days after any request to lift a topic ban has not been granted. If you are placed under a topic ban under this provision, and it is not subsequently revoked, a new 12 month period starts | |||
| :::#You will place these conditions at the top of your talkpage for their duration. | |||
| :::These are fairly heavy conditions, but at the moment I'm personally not comfortable with more lenient conditions. If you agree to these, the next step will be discussing them with the admin that blocked you, and further discussion on AN. ] (]) 17:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:BFG06.jpg)== | |||
| ] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 16:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 09:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20#It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 02:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:WrestleMania 23.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 10:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Doctor33 == | |||
| Minutes after his last edit, his sockpuppet case just came through by coincidence. He's finally been given a indefinite block. So I think it's all sorted now. -- ]] 12:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wii_Play.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. ]≈<small>]</small> 17:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| Want to add a comment on the report? You know where to go. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 00:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Mod Ruling== | |||
| Ok, how can we get a mod ruling on this, because this bullshit has to stop. ] 00:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, because you keep vandalizing the page and won't stop. BTW, there are no mods here, I think you mean admins. ] 00:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: No, You're the one vandalizing the page by removing what was essentially the whole fucking point of the show. Also, mods, admins, whatever you wanna call them. Someone needs to make a ruling, because this is pointless.] 00:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::The whole point of the show was a reunion of ECW wrestlers, the Bischoff thing was just one angle (which was only used to set up the brawl). Now stop pretending your vandalism is justified. ] 00:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It was used to set up the brawl. Which is why it happened after the brawl right? Your logic is amazing. ] 00:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I requested mediation ] 01:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You do know that there is a WikiProject for wrestling? ]. ] 01:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 01:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == DX == | |||
| Please stop removing Ric Flair and John Cena from the list of peripheral members. They are very close to members, Cena's tag-champ with Shawn even, and as the page says, they've allied against Rated RKO many times. Please do not remove this content again. ] 04:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Allies, peripheral members, same difference. Are we really suppose to believe that Mike Tyson and Jason Sensation are more members than Cena or Flair? ] 05:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: I've watched WWF/E for years, don't make me out like an idiot. As for the 3RR rules: well, you're removing content for no reason, which I believe is vandalism. Knock yourself out. ] 05:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::After spotting this in the Recent Changes, you have both been reported for 3RR. --] 06:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I left a message on the DX talk page. Good luck with the 3RR thing. Peace, -- '''] ]]''' 06:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| :Check your e-mail William. ] 21:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] | |||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 48 hours. ] 10:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)</div> | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sonic Wii.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. This is an automated message from ] 18:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=Before I was blocked, I had started a discussion at Talk:D-Generation X to resolve the dispute (although another editor agreed with me), and we had started to solve it. I also believe the length of my block (48 hours) is unfair. The other editor is the one who started the reverts, did more reverting than me, is currently in trouble for also reverting the Chaz Princeton article, wasn't willing to start a discussion), yet he was only blocked for 8 hours (which means his block has expired). So my block at the very least should be shortened. The other guy seems to be more to blame, so I don't think it's fair my punishment is more than triple his.|decline=This isn't your first block; looks like your fifth, and your third specifically for 3RR. It would appear to be the other user's first offense. You are well aware of the policy at this point. ] ] 04:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| Look at the talk page, me and him were trying to solve the problem. Can my block at least be reduced to 24 hours? I would like to be able to edit again before RAW begins (Monday night at 9pm). ] 04:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| We do need lots of vandal fighters on Monday nights, and he is one of the main vandal fighters who can recognize fancruft, original research, and week-by-week events without error. Block him over a Monday night and tons of wrestling articles pay the price. IMO, he does deserve the 48 hour block, sorry TJ, but we need this guy tomorrow night. Peace -- '''] ]]''' 04:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your mail == | |||
| Re your mail: you got 48h because of your previous record. And please realise that "the other guy started it" is not a good reason for breaking 3RR. | |||
| OTOH you're being reasonable now. If you'll leave that article alone for the length of your block (talk page is OK though) and promise to be good, I'll unblock you ] 09:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I promise. I will discuss the issue on the talk page, but will leave the actual page alone for a couple of days. ] 20:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: OK its done ] 20:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Batista == | |||
| I didn't add anything that hadn't occurred; Undertaker challenged Batista, it's in the past. It's not speculation, it's fact. (It's on the Undertaker page too.){{unsigned|160.39.212.149}} | |||
| :The match hasn't occured yet. I will take care of Undertaker's page as well. ] 03:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==It doesn't sound better== | |||
| Why cant you accept the fact that not everyone is going to share the same views you do? | |||
| The talk page at ] shows that more people agree it doesn't sound good. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No one objected because you started reverting before you claimed it sounded better on the project talk page. It doesn't sound better. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::It doesn't sound right though. Keep it simple. And like I said, do not blatantly revert just because you don't like other edits. Wait, talk it out, and see what happens. We were discussing it on the Project Talk Page, but you had to go ahead and revert anyways without a discussion first. Why do you think happened? I've been on Misplaced Pages longer and already you have more consecutive 3RR blocks than I do. Remember talk things out first. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 04:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Listen, when someone says, "It took place... (on).... (at)...(in)..." what more do you need to say? If you say "It took place... (on)... AND EMMANATED FROM ... (in)..." it sounds like you are repeating the same thing. It’s like saying "Something took place here and here again". It just doesn't sound right. The other way is better because it’s simple and gets straight to the point. Remember that certain words are best used in the right situations. In this case "AND EMMANATED FROM" is completely unnecessary. For now, there is this you should worry about, . Good luck with that. Cheers! -- ] <sup>]</sup> 05:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I agree with what bulletproof says, you seem to change the endings to the match as well to complete nonsense WITHOUT consulting anyone, plus it might help if you actually watched the pay-per-views so you know what the endings were ] 13:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :HBK, you are talking utter nonsense and you know it. ] 22:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Oh really? And why's that exactly? ] 18:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edit to ] == | |||
| In regards to , a link to ] already exists in the infobox. A second one is redundant and unneeded, especially from the reader's point of view. I believe ] covers this. ] 18:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==EWF== | |||
| Uhhh, how exactly do you figure that the EWF is not notable with so many mainstream sources? - 128.241.40.27 <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 02:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| :The page has to establish notability, which so far it doesn't. ] 02:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| That doesnt answer the question - {{unsigned|198.138.41.77}} | |||
| :::It is not my job to figure out if it's notable, it's the article's job to show why it is notable. ] 02:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::An article on George W. Bush would be deleted if it didn't say why he was important. That same goes for everything else. The page has to say why it is notable. If it doesn't it is useless. -- '''] ]]''' 02:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Fair enough - {{unsigned|198.138.41.77}} | |||
| == 3.38 million vs. 3.19 million == | |||
| Hi TJ! I've added a new section to the Wii discussion page to talk about the Worldwide numbers. Please see ] -> 3.38 million vs. 3.19 million. Thanks! --] 22:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == NWO 2000 proof == | |||
| Here are two sites that say that RDJJ was pinned after the 3D: | |||
| http://www.gerweck.net/nowayout00.htm | |||
| http://slam.canoe.ca/SlamWrestlingPPV/nowayout2000.html | |||
| And a picture showing Road Dogg getting pinned from WWE.com: | |||
| http://www.wwe.com/shows/nowayout/history/2000/photos/ | |||
| Also, do you have the tape at home? If you do, I suggest you rewatch it if these sites aren't good enough. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 22:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| ==RE: WrestleMania 22== | |||
| Well, the only reason why I found the WMVI/X8 thing notable was because coincidentally Edge and DDP both returned to compete at a WrestleMania after making an appearance at one before. Not only that but I find it even more interesting that they would return to a WrestleMania in the same stadium they appeared in before. I think it should be added if CM Punk goes on to compete at 23. However, I’m not too sure if he actually was one of the gangsters that appeared at 22 so a source would be need. I'll look for one. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 23:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I've got a picture of him. He had them up on his website. Check there. ] 02:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/6784/19aa0.jpg ] 21:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Michaels and Cena Page== | |||
| Just wanna let you know that the page has been re-created. I don't know how to do the AFD, could you help? ] | |||
| == Re: Children's Machine == | |||
| Sorry about that. Requested Move section created on talk page. Sigh, my browser crashed ''again'' while doing that. It's a Linux-specific problem, apparently. I guess Mozilla don't really care. I was tired and grumpy after it crashed the first time, I just wanted to go to bed, that's why I forgot to complete it. Sorry. — <span class="jeremysig" style="padding: 0.2em; border: 1px solid #6AF; background-color: #CEF; color: #000;">]</span><span class="jeremytalk" style="padding: 0.2em; border: 1px solid #FA6; border-left: none; background-color: #FEC; color: #000;">]</span> 10:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Vista== | |||
| Please restate your opinion on the ] move on the ]. Thank you. ]/<sup><small>]</small></sup> 03:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] code name == | |||
| The project code name for the Wii console was only "Revolution", just as the code name for the Nintendo GameCube was just "Dolphin" (as opposed to "Nintendo Dolphin"). "Nintendo Revolution" is what the press called it, which was presumably for clarifcation purposes. Information on this should be available in the references and external links of the ] article. ] 19:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Angle TNA.jpg)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. ] 08:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Adminship == | |||
| I think there is no way you could pass an RfA at the current time. People are very conscientious about a block record, and seeing that you were blocked just a week ago, you would definitely receive a ton of opposition. With your block log and history, I would suggest you wait at least 4-5 months before going for RfA. People need to see that you have improved your ways, and they shouldn't be seeing any recent blocks. Also, ] goes a long way. I know there are many accusations of your "article-controlling" and I'd appreciate it if you would ] for some of these users, and discuss with them instead of reverting their edits. You should read ]; some people complain against you because you write an edit summary like "rv vandalism", but it is just a good faith edit and nothing more. Calling someone's contributions can be slanderous to the person, and by doing so, we might end up losing a member of Misplaced Pages. So, basically I suggest you polish up your act for a few months before considering adminship here. ''']]''' 14:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: ] == | |||
| I noticed that you edited someone else's comment for clarity, spelling or grammar. As a rule, please refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see ]. Thanks, <!-- Template:Notyours -->] | ] 19:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Twilight Princess== | |||
| Please respond at the Twilight Princess talk page. <font color="#000080">]</font><small><font color="#00A86B">]</font></small> 01:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your edits to ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> ] 04:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == February 2007 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Misplaced Pages has a ] that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Misplaced Pages:Template messages/User talk namespace|, as you did to ],}} makes it harder to read. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-mos1}} --> –] 11:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] | |||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 -->] 12:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| Well, I guess you saw you violated 3RR a bit too late, TJ Spyke. If you are in a heated debate over an article and you feel you might cross 3RR, just stop and go to ] and request page protection or go to ] and report the other user for the violation. Thanks. ''']]''' 18:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I thought about doing that, but I thought I would get blocked as well. I could appeal the block, but they would probably just tell me to wait since it's just a 12 hour block (which expires in about 9 hours). I would think the blocking admin would have looked at what I tried to do to stop the problem, oh well. ] 20:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs == | |||
| Re : Another admin deleted it again. -- ] 19:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:24, 20 January 2024
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 30. Archives prior to February 10, 2008 (Archive 16) were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Help
Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help.
WikiCup 2010 June newsletter
We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were 
Ian Rose (submissions) (A), 
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (B, and the round's overall leader), 
ThinkBlue (submissions) (C) 
Casliber (submissions) and 
TonyTheTiger (submissions) (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.
Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.
If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 and Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to 
Stone (submissions) for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
May 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 20:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
TJ Spyke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand why I was blocked, and why some people don't think my edits (which never actually harmed articles, and actually improve them. And it annoyed me when a editor would revert the WHOLE edit instead of just the parts they feel were against the rules) were just beneficial to the site. I think enough time has passed that I have been able to reflect on it and change. I just want to be able to work on articles again and improve them, and will do my best not to violate the rules. I was actually working with an editor about making proposals to update the rules with common sense changes. I don't want to break any rules or be disruptive, I just want to be able to help and will do whatever I am asked to get my ban lifted. TJ Spyke 19:54, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't find this request particularly compelling, I think the best way forward would be if you indicated if you would be willing to abide by the conditions proposed below and them post a new unblock request. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Hi TJ. In the future, there are bound to be things that will annoy you again; wikipedia is big, there are people that are somewhat annoying, and a text-only medium as wikipedia is bound to provide misunderstandings that might also annoy you. You have a history of literally years of ANI threads and blocks. Your past behavior around problematic behavior and blocks have seemed to have been, ignore people who point out problems in your behaviour, and when it comes to blocks to just sit them out, and not changing anything in your behaviour. From your request here, what I read is that you say you understand you deserved it, but really you were doing the right thing. It should be obvious from your block log now that it is not. So you now say you will be doing your best not to break the rules, but you said that before, and it didn't work out. I really can't see how it is any different now, and any effective unblock request should address that. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Although I know my edits were good and helpful, I understand that the admins in charge don't want those edits. So I would just avoid making those edits. I would try to get the community to adopt policy changes for stuff that would improve articles (and maybe stem the tide of editors leaving), but would follow the rules in place. I have improved in the past, like how I stopped engaging in edit wars (a problem I had early), so I can change and get better. I just want a chance to show I can do better, I have been a very good editor (I was one of the primary editors that got the Wii article to FA status) and my only problems are that fixing redirects is frowned upon. Even though it is just plain silly to be not allowed, I will abide by it. TJ Spyke 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- As a piece of friendly advice: Just avoid changing redirects altogether. Don't "fix" them for any reason. They are obviously a weak spot in your editing history and I have very little confidence that you even understand the community rules in this area. The edit history of your IP account shows that you've been making changes like this several times per month even since your current block was put in place. Not all are bad, but several clearly violate WP:NOTBROKEN. I don't think you have any self control when it comes to "fixing" redirects, so if you're allowed back from this third indef block, you should really resist the temptation to touch any redirects at all. -Thibbs (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Although I know my edits were good and helpful, I understand that the admins in charge don't want those edits. So I would just avoid making those edits. I would try to get the community to adopt policy changes for stuff that would improve articles (and maybe stem the tide of editors leaving), but would follow the rules in place. I have improved in the past, like how I stopped engaging in edit wars (a problem I had early), so I can change and get better. I just want a chance to show I can do better, I have been a very good editor (I was one of the primary editors that got the Wii article to FA status) and my only problems are that fixing redirects is frowned upon. Even though it is just plain silly to be not allowed, I will abide by it. TJ Spyke 20:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- To the reviewing admin: If you are interested in restoring TJ Spyke's access, I'd strongly recommend that it be a conditional unblock based on a firm commitment by TJ Spyke to leave all redirects entirely alone from now on. And obviously he'd need to be monitored for a period to ensure his compliance. He's not a worthless editor by any means, but the problems he does have are utterly intractable in my opinion. The only way to control the issue would be to impose zero tolerance for his redirect "fixing" behavior. -Thibbs (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- What would be considered leaving all redirects alone? For example, would fixing a link from "Wrestlemania" to "WrestleMania" violate it? Or "North America Eastern Time Zone" to "Eastern Time Zone"? I.e. would I have to avoid changing any links, or what? Assuming I do get unblocked. TJ Spyke 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Any unblock would be basically under probation. You seem quite capable of finding new and novel ways to do stuff that the community either doesn't want happening, or currently doesn't want you to do. I would like to discuss with your blocking admin and ANI the following unblock conditions:
- You are banned from changing the target of any wikilink for a year. If you would want to change ] to WrestleMania, you'll use a piped link that conserves the target as in ]
- You will observe a 1 revert rule for six months
- For the duration of a year, any administrator can unilaterally place you under a topic ban for any topic and any length up to six months. In case you believe that a specific topic ban isn't justified, you may request the topic ban lifted on ANI. The topic ban will remain in effect until the discussion on ANI is closed as not to uphold the topic ban. You will not request revocation of a topic ban for 30 days after any request to lift a topic ban has not been granted. If you are placed under a topic ban under this provision, and it is not subsequently revoked, a new 12 month period starts
- You will place these conditions at the top of your talkpage for their duration.
- These are fairly heavy conditions, but at the moment I'm personally not comfortable with more lenient conditions. If you agree to these, the next step will be discussing them with the admin that blocked you, and further discussion on AN. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Any unblock would be basically under probation. You seem quite capable of finding new and novel ways to do stuff that the community either doesn't want happening, or currently doesn't want you to do. I would like to discuss with your blocking admin and ANI the following unblock conditions:
- What would be considered leaving all redirects alone? For example, would fixing a link from "Wrestlemania" to "WrestleMania" violate it? Or "North America Eastern Time Zone" to "Eastern Time Zone"? I.e. would I have to avoid changing any links, or what? Assuming I do get unblocked. TJ Spyke 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion
User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. realsanix (Hello!) 16:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
"It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § It's a Wonderful Life (that 70's show) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)