Revision as of 02:22, 13 June 2022 view sourceAkashroy100 (talk | contribs)1 edit changed the false information to the reliable and accurate one as per mentioned in wikiislam.net (official website)Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:00, 23 November 2024 view source PowerBUL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users586 editsNo edit summary | ||
(220 intermediate revisions by 70 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description| |
{{Short description|Wiki covering selective topics on Islam and owned by Ex-Muslims of North America}} | ||
{{pp|small=yes}} | |||
{{Infobox website | {{Infobox website | ||
| name = WikiIslam | | name = WikiIslam | ||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
| launch_date = {{Start date and age|df=yes/no|2006|09|04}} | | launch_date = {{Start date and age|df=yes/no|2006|09|04}} | ||
| current_status = Active | | current_status = Active | ||
| content_license = ] 3.0 | | content_license = ] 3.0 | ||
}} | |||
}} | |||
'''WikiIslam''' strives to be the most comprehensive and accurate source of information on Islam freely and accessibly available online, drawing from both Islam's primary sources (the Qur'an, hadith and Islamic scholars) as well as from the historical-critical (sometimes called revisionist) analysis of these primary sources by modern historians. Currently, WikiIslam hosts 964 articles. | |||
<!-- Please see ongoing discussion in article's talk page before changing introduction. See WP:CON -->'''WikiIslam''' is an ]{{refn|<ref name="CIWI">{{cite journal |last1=Larsson |first1=Göran |title=Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam |journal=Contemporary Islam |date=1 June 2007 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=53–67 |doi=10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2 |s2cid=144896607 |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2 |language=en |issn=1872-0226}}</ref><ref name="CyberOrient">{{cite journal |last1=Enstedt |first1=Daniel |last2=Larsson |first2=Göran |title=Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations of Islam on WikiIslam.net |journal=CyberOrient |date=2013 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=64–93 |doi=10.1002/j.cyo2.20130701.0003 |url=https://cyberorient.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2013/04/CyberOrient_Vol_7_Iss_1_Enstedt_Larsson.pdf |access-date=12 July 2020 |issn=1804-3194}}</ref><ref name ="Breivik">{{Cite book|title=In the Tracks of Breivik: Far Right Networks in Northern and Eastern Europe |first=Göran |last=Larsson |chapter=Islamophobia or Legitimate Concern? Contrasting Official and Populist Understanding of Opposition to Muslims |publisher=Lit Verlag |year=2014 |isbn=9783643905420 |location=Vienna |oclc=881140905 |pages=155–66 |editor-last1=Mays |editor-first1=Christin |editor-last2=Deland |editor-first2=Mats |editor-last3=Minkenberg |editor-first3=Michael}}</ref><ref name="Uddin">{{cite book |last1=Uddin |first1=Asma T. |title=When Islam Is Not a Religion: Inside America's Fight for Religious Freedom |date=2019 |location=New York |isbn=978-1643131740 |edition=First Pegasus Books hardcover |quote=The rampantly anti-Muslim website, WikiIslam, connects Islam and pedophilia even more brazenly, 'Pedophilia is permitted in the Qur’an, was practiced by Prophet Muhammad and his companions, and some Muslims today continue to commit the crime, following their prophet’s example.'}}</ref><ref name="InOutIslam">{{cite book |last1=Enstedt |first1=Daniel |editor1-last=van Nieuwkerk |editor1-first=Karin |title=Moving in and out of Islam |date=2018 |publisher=University of Texas Press |location=Austin, TX |isbn=978-1-4773-1748-8 |page=74 |edition=First |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uPxzDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA74 |chapter=Understanding Religious Apostasy, Disaffiliation, and Islam in Contemporary Sweden |quote=Anti-Muslim rhetoric on internet sites such as WikiIslam.net ... and faithfreedom.org ... reproduce a negative image of religion that is associated with Islam.}}</ref><ref name="Khan">{{cite book |last1=Khan |first1=Nadia |editor1-last=Smith |editor1-first=Jane |editor2-last=Haddad |editor2-first=Yvonne |title=The Oxford Handbook of American Islam |date=Jan 2015 |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199862634 |chapter=American Muslims in the Age of New Media |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199862634.013.005 |quote=American Muslim organizations use new media both to address issues internal to their community and to counter growing anti-Muslim sentiment. For example, in 2005, Wiki Islam debuted, claiming to provide a 'politically incorrect' alternative to Misplaced Pages.}}</ref>}} and ]{{refn|<ref name="CIWI"/><ref name="Shukri"/>}} wiki.<ref name ="Breivik"/> The website was founded by ] in 2006.<ref name ="Breivik"/> Registered users may modify and edit its content;<ref name ="Breivik"/> in 2015, the website was acquired by the ]<ref name="EXMNA">{{Cite news|date=2015-12-03|title=Ex-Muslims of North America takes ownership and operation of WikiIslam|url=https://exmuslims.org/ex-muslims-north-america-takes-ownership-operation-wikiislam/|access-date=2020-05-26|website=Ex-Muslims of North America|language=en-US}}</ref> and underwent a major revision in 2020.<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023">{{cite journal |last1=Kozaric |first1=Edin |last2=Brekke |first2=Torkel |title=The case of WikiIslam: scientification of Islamophobia or legitimate critique of Islam? |journal=Ethnic and Racial Studies |date=2023 |pages=1–19 |doi=10.1080/01419870.2023.2268154 |s2cid=264331620 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/01419870.2023.2268154?needAccess=true |language=en |doi-access=free |hdl=10852/109661 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> | |||
As a non-political and non-religious wiki, the site remains neutral towards religions, world views, and issues of a political nature and likewise stays away from extremist, sensationalist or emotional commentary. | |||
WikiIslam is an international site with contributors and readers from all over the world, and the site's policies and content reflect this. | |||
The articles on WikiIslam are produced by an open community of editors from various political, religious, and ethnic backgrounds. The only thing contributors are required to have in common is a commitment to providing unbiased and objective information on Islam. If you think you fit this description and would like to contribute, contact us, and you will readily be provided with a login. | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
The website was registered on October 27, 2005 and launched on September 4, 2006.<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}} It was founded by ], an Iranian-born Canadian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, Faith Freedom International,<ref name="Breivik"/>{{rp|162}}{{Efn|FFI has stated that its aim is to "unmask Islam and help Muslims leave ".<ref name="Breivik" />}} part of the ] network.<ref name="Busher">{{cite book |last1=Busher |first1=Joel |title=The Making of Anti-Muslim Protest: Grassroots Activism in the English Defence League |date=2016 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=9781315661377}}</ref>{{rp|47|quote=He was particularly taken by the writings of Ali Sina, an Iranian ex-Muslim, the founder of Faith Freedom Initiative, a well-known counter-jihad website, and a board member of Pamela Geller's Stop Islamization of Nations.}} As of 2013, among the site's aim was to act in defence against a perceived "global threat" of Muslims and Islam;<ref name="CyberOrient" />{{rp|65|quote=Besides providing critical information about Islam and Muslims, the aim of the site is also to build online defensive position against Islam and Muslims as a global threat....WikiIslam provides Internet users with new ways of combating and criticising Islam and Muslims in both cyberspace and offline, by circulating critical information about Islam and Muslims.}} the site described its purpose as "collect facts relating to the criticism{{Efn|As used on WikiIslam, to be "critical" has meant holding preconceived negative opinions of Muslims and Islam.<ref name="CIWI" />{{rp|57|quote=Those who call up the homepage are also reminded that this is a critical site and that it does not contain any pro-Islamic content. In this specific context, to be critical is to hold a preconceived and negative opinion about Islam and Muslims.}}}} of Islam from valid Islamic sources" without the effect of " censorship" that is common in ].<ref name="Breivik" />{{rp|162}}<ref name=":0">{{cite book |last1=Gardell |first1=Mattias |author-link=Mattias Gardell |title=Islamofobi |date=2012 |publisher=Leopard förlag |location=Stockholm |isbn=9789173434027 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vC6bCwAAQBAJ |language=Swedish |quote=WikiIslam – en 'islamkritisk encyklopedi' som skapades av antimuslimska cyberaktivister som slutit sig till att deras inlägg på Misplaced Pages 'censurerades' av politiskt korrekta redaktörer och motsades av muslimer som lade sig i samtalet om islam och muslimer – anser att 'termen islamofobi är avledande, uppeggande och ofta används för att förhindra mycket legitim kritik av islam'.}}</ref><ref name="CIWI" />{{rp|57}} It rejected concerns of Islamophobia by arguing that Islam has been proved to be a "dangerous ideology".<ref name=":0" /> | |||
WikiIslam aims to provide accurate and accessible information from traditional and critical perspectives on the beliefs, practices, and development of Islam. WikiIslam is a non-partisan website focused exclusively on Islamic beliefs and practices. All content is therefore focused purely on Islam and how it is practiced, not on its promotion, condemnation, or topics that are sociopolitical in nature or are with regard to other faith traditions. | |||
As a "community-edited website", the wiki was set to be edited and modified by (registered) approved ].<ref name="Breivik" />{{rp|162}} {{As of|2018}},{{Efn|name=Larsson2018|Larsson's latest publication on the site is from 2018 where he asks readers to consult his publications from 2007 and 2013 for scholarship on WikiIslam.<ref name="Larsson2018">{{Cite journal|last=Larsson|first=Göran|date=2018-03-13|title=Disputed, Sensitive and Indispensable Topics: The Study of Islam and Apostasy|url=https://brill.com/view/journals/mtsr/30/3/article-p201_1.xml|journal=Method & Theory in the Study of Religion|volume=30|issue=3|pages=201–226|doi=10.1163/15700682-12341435|issn=0943-3058|quote=For example, the anti-Muslim webpage WikiIslam (on this homepage, see Larsson 2007; Enstedt and Larsson 2013) simply concludes: 'The punishment for apostasy in the Islamic faith is death.'}}</ref>}} information on (alleged) internal contradictions in the ], persecution of non-Muslims and ex-Muslims, follies of ] etc. were held; a narrow focus is maintained on "violence, sexuality and gender conflicts".<ref name="CIWI" /><ref name="Breivik" />{{rp|162}} Also as of 2018,{{Efn|name=Larsson2018}} apostasy testimonies were featured too<ref name="CyberOrient" /> and the site held a list of 101 provocative questions which are to be asked of any Muslim to prove that Islam is not a "true religion," running in tune with the site's active encouragement to criticize Muslims.<ref name="CIWI" />{{rp|59|quote=WikiIslam also encourages its visitors to question and criticise all Muslims for their belief in Islam.... The visitor is also recommended to make use of the Internet to criticise Muslims and spread negative information about them and about Islam.}} The same year, WikiIslam was noted to feature slurs about Muhammad.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=O'Brian |first=Peter |date=2018 |title=Islamophobia & Europhobia: Expanding Rhetorics of Exclusion |url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=698049 |journal=Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology & Cultural Studies |language=English |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=16 |issn=2066-768X}}</ref> Translations of content into multiple languages are available.<ref name="CyberOrient" /> In December 2015, the ] (EXMNA), a secularist organization, took ownership and operation of the site.<ref name="EXMNA" /> | |||
All content on WikiIslam is required to reference either primary, historical sources (such as the earliest qur'anic codices, hadiths, siras, and tafsirs) or scholarly secondary sources published by reliable academic journals and presses (e.g. Fred Donner's ''Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam'', published by Harvard University Press). While the claims of latter-day Islamic scholars (e.g. Ibn Kathir or al-Suyuti) provide useful reference for the continuously developing positions of the various Islamic orthodoxies, they do not suffice as historical evidence for the claims they present. | |||
Around 2020, a major revision to WikiIslam took place with a stated aim to "provide accurate and accessible information from traditional and critical perspectives” on Islam, and stressing a "zero-tolerance policy on hateful, misleading, unencyclopedic, and polemical content."<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|2}} As of 2022, WikiIslam did not "meet all the requirements stated in their own vision document," although some content was in line with the new vision.<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|9–10, 16}} Articles generally presented how Muslim scholars have addressed specific "questions or episodes in the history of Islam"; internal variations and differences among Muslim scholars are also "often presented."<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|10}} However, there is "seldom (if ever)" content that includes modern discussions or "progressive interpretations."<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|10}} In addition, there was a bias in the selection of topics covered on the website, some of which explicitly or implicitly linked Muslims with a non-rational worldview that is incompatible with a scientific outlook, and often tended to cast them or Islam in a negative light when voices of contemporary scholars or contextualisation of debates were lacking.<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|11, 3}} WikiIslam continues to have "hardly any information that presents Muslims in a positive or neutral way."<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|11}} | |||
WikiIslam requires written content to be at once accessibly and professional. Articles are required to be clear and detailed without assuming anything other than most basic background knowledge on the part of the audience. Skewed perspectives and modes of writing of any sort, be they provincial, parochial, or patriarchal, have no place on WikiIslam. | |||
Any site content that falls beyond the bounds set by WikiIslam is removed or renovated by editors upon being brought to their attention. | |||
== Reception == | == Reception == | ||
{{Islamophobia}} | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Policies and Guidelines | |||
In 2007, Göran Larsson<!-- Do not wikilink ], who is not the same person -->, Professor of Religious Studies at ], argued that WikiIslam is an ] web portal{{efn|Larsson's 2007 view was summarized by Ruth Tsuria, an expert on the intersection of digital media and religion:<ref name="Profile Ruth Tsuria">{{Cite web|date=2017-08-03|title=Profile Ruth Tsuria|url=https://www.shu.edu/profiles/RuthTsuria.cfm|access-date=2021-12-26|website=Seton Hall University|language=en}}</ref> "Larsson argues that WikiIslam takes a closed attitude in its understanding of Islam, and so should be seen as an Islamophobic web portal."<ref name="Tsuria 225">{{Cite journal |last=Tsuria |first=Ruth |date=2013-01-01 |title=The video Three Things About Islam: Islamophobia online or a religious dialogue |url=https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67442 |journal=Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis |volume=25 |pages=225 |doi=10.30674/scripta.67442 |issn=2343-4937 |doi-access=free}}</ref> However, Larsson conceded that since WikiIslam contained a list of links to other websites—such as that of the ]—, it was difficult to argue that ''all'' information posted on the site was Islamophobic.<ref name="CIWI" />{{rp|63}}}} and that the stories on WikiIslam were selected only to show that Muslims are "ignorant, backward or even stupid".<ref name="CIWI" />{{rp|59|quote=My impression is that the stories reported by WikiIslam have merely been selected to show that Muslims are ignorant, backward or even stupid.}} In a 2014 survey of "anti-Muslim websites",<ref name="Breivik" />{{rp|161}} Larsson profiled WikiIslam's apparent aim as "present Islamic history, theology and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith".<ref name="Breivik" />{{rp|162|quote=he apparent aim of this site is to present Islamic history, theology and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith, discouraging them from either taking up or continuing its practice. The focus, in other words, is on violence, sexuality and gender conflicts, leaving WikiIslam's potential visitors without easy access to material that might counterbalance its narrowly-focused view and/or convey the fact that Muslim theologians hold differing opinions about many of the site's topics.}} He repeated his position in 2018, citing WikiIslam as an example of an "anti-Muslim webpage."<ref name="Larsson2018" /> | |||
Over the course of many years, WikiIslam has developed a comprehensive and ever evolving set collection of policies and guidelines to help administer, guide, and set expectations for the work of its editors. These policies and guidelines define everything from the specific sort of content considered appropriate to the wiki (its scope), writing style, citation format and standards, article structure, source-editing practices (Wikitext), guidelines for talk pages, pending changes protection practices, good faith practices, and the wiki's legal disclaimers. | |||
WikiIslam's admins enforce the above policies, and editors and visitors are encouraged to either report deviations from these standards to those better situated to correct them or to correct the error or violation themselves (by requesting an account if needed). | |||
== Policies and Guidelines == | |||
== Content == | |||
=== Scope and article relevance === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance | |||
This article defines the scope of WikiIslam, to assist editors and volunteers in understanding the nature and limits of WikiIslam. The article relevance section of this article and the flowchart included therein give more detailed guidance as to how one can determine whether or not an article or a body of content have a home on WikiIslam. | |||
=== How to Edit === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:How to Edit | |||
This article is a quick, easy introduction to the main tools used in creating end editing WikiIslam articles. | |||
=== Source editing === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Source Editing | |||
Formatting a WikiIslam article differs from when writing on a standard word processor. Wikis use text codes to create particular elements of the page (e.g., headings). This markup language is known as wikitext (or wiki-markup) and is designed for ease of editing. | |||
The Source Editing page will teach editors how to edit from the articles source. It also teaches how to use types of quoting, linking, and important templates for all editors. Learning the WikiIslam source language will make editing much easier and intuitive. | |||
Editors who are wondering how to create specific parts of an article should go here. | |||
== Article guidelines == | |||
=== Naming Conventions === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Article Naming | |||
Names of article on WikiIslam need to allow them to be accurately and efficiently found in Google searches, while accurately describing the article and also not causing broken links on WikiIslam or elsewhere. | |||
=== Writing style === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Writing Style Guide | |||
WikiIslam is an international site with administrators, editors and contributors from all over the world. Readership is vast and not saturated by any demographic of visitors, so the content should reflect this. Material should be tailored to accommodate, as best as possible, a universal audience. | |||
WikiIslam is not a political site. The site does not have a left or right-wing political agenda, nor is it a counter-jihad site. Articles concerning immigration, culture wars, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and other related issues are strictly prohibited. Articles should always remain neutral towards all religions and world views, neither promoting nor criticizing them. | |||
Editors are expected to take a scholarly and rational approach in their conduct and criticisms. Editors should stay away from extremist, sensationalist, sarcastic or emotional commentary by letting the facts speak for themselves. Articles should also be free from vulgar, offensive, or slang language. In short, articles should include no personal opinions or deductions, only referenced facts. | |||
Any analysis of Islam should be based on its own mainstream rules and religious sources, meaning articles should never endorse (but may simply document or challenge) fringe theories unsupported by the majority of evidence. There should be no personal opinions or abstract deductions, and every statement of fact must be supported by reliable, published sources. Use of secondary sources to present a historical-critical perspective is also encouraged. Content of this sort should derive from content published by reliable academic journal and presses (e.g. Fred Donner's ''Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam'', published by Harvard University Press). | |||
Copying and pasting articles from other sites is not allowed. Nor is, for various reasons, copying and pasting articles from Misplaced Pages. However, there are some exceptions to this rule e.g. where a suitable Misplaced Pages article is going to be deleted or has been deleted. If something specific is being quoted from another site, it should be made clear that it is a quotation. | |||
=== Citing, linking, quoting, plagiarism === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Citing, Linking, and Quoting | |||
All statements of facts, especially those that are likely to be challenged, must be referenced using inline citations. Naked URLs are not sufficient. What is being referenced should be easily identifiable without having to leave the page through an external link. Minimal information (if available) should include the URL, page title, author, publisher and the date of publication. Each link must also be archived to avoid link rot. When quoting from these sources, bold or italic emphasis may be added, but underlining and all-capitals should be avoided. | |||
Although WikiIslam does not host original research, and is built upon citations of established works of scholarship and primary sources, it does consist of original content. As such, WikiIslam maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards the wholesale copying and pasting of content from other websites, whether they be Misplaced Pages or any other source in print or on the web. As such any editor who engages in this type of plagiarism will be subject to an immediate ban. | |||
=== Article structure === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Structure | |||
The Structure of an article concerns the organization of sections and media. Better structure allows the reader to navigate the page easier and feels more intuitive. The structure should also seek to give maintain cohesiveness throughout the wiki. This aims to give the reader a better experience by using a predictable layout. WikiIslam employs an encyclopedic format for all articles. (e.g. 72 Virgins, The Qur'an). All articles can be adjusted to keep the flow and intuitive feel of the article but must be encyclopedic in nature. | |||
=== Article deletion === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Articles or Categories for Deletion | |||
Articles which meet the following criteria are subject to speedy deletion: | |||
* Broken redirects to non-existent pages | |||
* Libelous articles without any 3rd party references | |||
* Articles copied entirely from another source such as Misplaced Pages, word-for-word and without substantial reworking or rewording | |||
In addition, any article which fails to meet the criteria of our | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance | |||
document is subject to deletion. | |||
== Reliable sources == | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Reliable Sources | |||
WikiIslam articles should be based on reliable, published sources. References that are cited must explicitly support any claims being made. There are three types of sources: | |||
=== Primary sources === | |||
Primary sources are original materials, an artifact, a document, a recording, or other source of information that was created at the time under study. In an article about a book it would be the book itself. In the case of a person, it would be the subject themselves. WikiIslam's analysis of Islam is based on its own sources (the Qur'an, hadith and Islamic scholars) as well as secondary scholarly sources (e.g. Shahab Ahmed's ''Before Orthodoxy'', published by Harvard University Press). | |||
Use of primary sources is not limited and they should be freely used in articles. However, only published and recognized translations of primary sources are to be used, and they must be quoted exactly as they appear in the cited reference. | |||
=== Secondary sources === | |||
Secondary sources are documents or recordings that relate or discuss information originally presented elsewhere. For example, a statement by a scholar about a certain battle in the history of Islam would be a secondary source. News articles that report on a development or an incident are also secondary sources. Statements of fact concerning Islam from polemic sources such as books, articles or commentaries by individuals such as Robert Spencer, Pamela Gellar, Mark A. Gabriel etc. are not to be used under any circumstances as references on WikiIslam. If editors come across any such statements, they must remove them immediately. | |||
Secondary sources referenced on WikiIslam should be published by reliable academic presses and journals. | |||
=== Tertiary sources === | |||
Tertiary sources are sources that rely upon primary and secondary sources. Unlike secondary sources, they attempt to provide a broad introductory overview of a topic. ''The New Encyclopedia of Islam'' would be an example. They may be used as well. There are a variety of encyclopedias. | |||
== Interactions == | |||
=== User names/pages === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:User Names and Pages | |||
Usernames should be chosen appropriately and should not be promotional, misleading, disruptive or offensive towards a race, religion or social group in any way. Usernames that fall under any of these categories will be renamed by an administrator. | |||
Userpages should not be used as placeholders or homes for articles and essays. Personal email addresses should also not be displayed. Active editors with over 50 constructive edits are permitted to post links. However, these should also be chosen appropriately and they should try to keep the number of links within 10. | |||
=== Talk pages === | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Talk Pages | |||
The purpose of a talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes directly relating to its associated article or project page. Acceptable topics for discussion include concerns directly relating to the page, such as inaccuracies, formatting, renaming, merging and suggestions for further improvement. They are not there for irrelevant debates or for general attacks on the site or its editors. | |||
Talk pages should not be blanked, and other users' messages should not be removed or altered unless a valid reason is provided (such as violating the above rules). All new discussion topics should be given a relevant heading and created at the bottom of the page, below all previous discussions, and all messages should be signed and follow the rules concerning indentation. Users should avoid excessive emphasis and be concise; capital letters are considered shouting, and long, rambling messages or SMS language may be difficult to understand and will be ignored. For continuity of discussion, comments should be kept on the same talk page where they were initiated. | |||
==== Indentation ==== | |||
Good indentation makes prolonged discussions on talk pages easier to read and understand. Replies should always be indented and placed beneath the last comment. Indents are achieved by typing one or more leading colon ":" characters at the very left margin, just before the new text about to be added. With every new comment added, the number of colons must be increased by one. | |||
A long discussion will cause indentation to become too deep, which can make it difficult to read in narrower browser windows. When this occurs, editors should consider resetting the level of indentation by outdenting their next comment. Outdenting must be performed by using the "Outdent" template. | |||
==== Signatures ==== | |||
Signing comments on talk pages, both for the article and non-article namespaces, facilitates discussion by helping identify the author of a particular comment. Occasional forgetfulness is understandable but if certain editors continually ignore requests to sign their comments, any new comments by them should be reverted and a discussion should be initiated on their user talk page. | |||
Customized signatures, like usernames, should be chosen appropriately and not be promotional, misleading, disruptive or offensive. They must include at least one direct internal link to the editor's user page, user talk page, or contributions page, allowing other editors easy access to their talk page and contributions log. Images or templates should not be used in signatures as this may cause unnecessary server load. | |||
=== Contributions === | |||
==== Pending changes ==== | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Pending Changes Protection | |||
Pending changes protection has been implemented to help maintain the quality of the sites content and to minimize vandalism. This means changes from new editors are reviewed by other editors (usually within 24 hours) before they appear on the website. Once a new user demonstrates that their edits are properly referenced, properly formatted and comply with guidelines, they will receive the 'Editor' user right which means their own edits will be approved automatically. | |||
==== Corrections ==== | |||
It is the responsibility of each individual editor to make sure that their own edits are of a high standard. Edits should not be made with the expectation that someone else will fix the problems those edits may have caused (e.g. spelling, punctuation, formatting, broken links/redirects etc.). | |||
When a user makes contributions that need corrections or cleanup by another editor, these issues should be explained to them on their talk page. If their contributions continue to suffer from the same issues after being corrected two or three times and having the matter explained to them, editors should then revert their future edits, ask them to see their talk page (in the edit summary) and consult with other editors and administrators. | |||
==== Good faith ==== | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Assume Good Faith | |||
Assuming good faith is the assumption that a user's edits and comments are made in good faith. This guideline does not prohibit discussion and criticism. Rather, editors should not attribute the actions being criticized to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice or obvious vandalism. If an editor wishes to express doubts about the conduct of another user, they should substantiate those doubts with specific diffs and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for their concerns. WikiIslam administrators and other experienced editors involved in dispute resolution will usually be glad to help, and are very capable of identifying policy-breaching conduct if their attention is drawn to clear and specific evidence. | |||
==== Blocking policy ==== | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:Blocking_Policy | |||
Blocking is a tool to be used to protect the integrity of WikiIslam and the harmony of the community of its editors. Blocks are not to be used to settle score, punish lack of knowledge, or exclude certain points of view. Rather they are to be used to keep the Wiki free of bots, vandals, griefers, trolls, and other bad faith actors. The main criterion for a block is the question: can this user make a positive contribution to the site in the future? If the answer is no then a block is warranted. Different types of infractions warrant different types of blocks for different amounts of time, depending on the severity of the infraction. | |||
== Legal == | |||
Main page: WikiIslam:General disclaimer | |||
The community working here is a voluntary association of individuals and groups who are developing an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia. The structure of this site, which is a wiki, allows anyone with an Internet connection and World Wide Web browser to alter the content found here. Therefore, please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by professionals with the expertise necessary to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information. | |||
That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in WikiIslam; much of the time you will. However, WikiIslam cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields. | |||
== History == | |||
As of late 2018, Ex-Muslims of North America initiated an overhaul of WikiIslam, with the stated goal of setting a high criteria of objectivity, neutrality, and professionalism. The mission statement and new policy and writing guidelines were added, while many articles on the site were removed, including satirical and polemical content, ex-Muslim testimonies, as well as op-eds and personal essays. Article templates, hubs, the main website categorization system, and the front page were also heavily modified. | |||
WikiIslam was created on October 27, 2005 by various online activists led by the user Axius and was hosted on server space provided by Faith Freedom International. Starting in August 2008, the site separated from FFI, hosted its own servers, and began operating as an independent site run by its contributors. In 2015, following excessive amounts of vandalism, the site came under the management of the Ex-Muslims of North America. | |||
== Audience == | |||
On average, it currently receives over 250,000 visitors a month generating about 500,000 page views. As of September 2014, Alexa.com places it within the top 70,000 most visited websites. | |||
WikiIslam's audience is not "Eurocentric". A large percentage of its readers are from Eastern or Muslim-majority nations such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, and Singapore (often accessed through WikiIslam's alternative domains, especially where WikiIslam has been banned). Likewise, many of the site's administrators and editors are from a Muslim background or are skeptics from Muslim majority nations. | |||
The site is always looking for editors to translate English articles into Indonesian, Urdu, Bengali, Arabic, and other languages. There are translations from English already available at the site in several languages, including Azerbaijani, French, Turkish and Uzbek. A Russian sub-domain was started in early 2013 and a Bulgarian sub-domain was created in April, 2015. | |||
== WikiIslam vs. Misplaced Pages == | |||
WikiIslam's primary focus is on the religion of Islam while Misplaced Pages is a compendium of general knowledge. These differing goals have led to different policies and guidelines. | |||
In 2013, Daniel Enstedt and Larsson wrote that the website has been "often perceived as being anti-Muslim, if not Islamophobic,"<ref name="CyberOrient" />{{rp|65|quote=For highlighting negative and biased perceptions about Islam and Muslims, the site is often perceived as being anti-Muslim, if not Islamophobic.}} describing the then-present content on WikiIslam as part of a "negative and biased"<ref name="CyberOrient"/>{{rp|64|quote=From the six testimonies it is clear that Islam is presented in a negative and biased way, as summed up in the following three points: (1) Islam is an irrational, illogical way of thought; the beliefs that Islam holds to be true are false; (2) Islam is not about peace, high standards and God; Islam is an evil, self-centered and morally corrupt religion, and Muslims are hypocrites; (3) Islam is an oppressive, misogynist and violent religion, and is negative for its followers, especially women.}} representation of Islam that could "easily be turned into an important weapon in the hands of those who want to express anti-Muslim feelings"; the site propagated "an Islamophobic world view that present Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all others."<ref name="CyberOrient" />{{rp|88|quote=From this point of view these stories can easily be turned into an important weapon in the hands of those who want to express anti-Muslim feelings and so constitute an important element in an Islamophobic world view that presents Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all other world views.}} Both Enstedt and Larrson have contended WikiIslam's selection and presentation of Islamic topics to be "very one-dimensional" with "alternative interpretations seldom represented".<ref name="CyberOrient" />{{rp|64–65|quote=Quotes are taken from Islamic sources and sayings from Muslim spokespersons and therefore presented as authentic, but selection and presentation of the material remains very one-dimensional, and alternative interpretations are seldom represented.}}<ref name="Breivik" />{{rp|162|quote=The focus, in other words, is on violence, sexuality and gender conflicts, leaving WikiIslam's potential visitors without easy access to material that might counterbalance its narrowly-focused view and/or convey the fact that Muslim theologians hold differing opinions about many of the site's topics.}} | |||
Misplaced Pages discourages the use of primary and what they term as "non-notable/reliable" sources. WikiIslam, on the other hand, (in addition to secondary scholarly sources) encourages the use of authentic primary religious text and the rulings of authoritative Muslim scholars who may not be notable to people outside of the Muslim world but who are giants from within. | |||
In 2019, Asma Uddin, an advisor on religious liberty to the ] and a fellow at the ],<ref>{{Cite web|last=Affairs|first=Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World|title=Asma Uddin|url=https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/asma-uddin|access-date=2021-12-26|website=berkleycenter.georgetown.edu|language=en}}</ref> reiterated WikiIslam to be a "rampantly anti-Muslim website".<ref name="Uddin" /> The same year, Syaza Shukri, Professor of Political Sciences at ], deemed the lack of positive content on WikiIslam to demonstrate a "definite agenda": the promotion of a monolithic version of Islam—violent, oppressive, and unrepresentative of "how a majority of Muslims view their religion".<ref name="Shukri">{{cite journal |last1=Shukri |first1=Syaza Farhana Mohamad |title=The Perception of Indonesian Youths toward Islamophobia: An Exploratory Study |journal=Islamophobia Studies Journal |date=2019 |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=61–75 |doi=10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |jstor=10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |s2cid=213425625 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061 |issn=2325-8381 |quote=Larsson (2007) did a research on Islamophobia on the Internet, specifically the anti-Islam portal WikiIslam. Unlike Misplaced Pages, WikiIslam only produces content that are critical to Islam. While the owner does not consider the website to be a hate site, the fact that there is nothing positive about Islam on it proves that it has a definite agenda.... WikiIslam is of course promoting Islam as a monolithic religion that is violent and oppressive, and more importantly, does not represent how a majority of Muslims view their religion.}}</ref>{{rp|65}} Rabia Kamal, a cultural anthropologist based at ], finds WikiIslam to be of the many Islamophobic websites dedicated to "surveillance" of Islam and Muslims.<ref name="Kamal">{{cite journal |last1=Kamal |first1=Rabia |title=Muslims and Social Media in North America |journal=Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion |date=18 July 2022 |doi=10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.899|isbn=978-0-19-934037-8 |quote=In fact, many Islamophobic websites have taken on the responsibility of nongovernmental surveillance as an element of their agenda. Internet hubs such as WikiIslam and websites such as Campus Watch, Jihad Watch, and thereligionofpeace.com are just a few of the digital platforms explicitly dedicated to the surveillance of Muslims and Islam both on- and offline.}}</ref> | |||
Misplaced Pages focuses on "verifiability, not truth". In regards to Islam, it has meant they accept what "notable/reliable" western commentators say about Islam's religious texts over what the religious text and Muslim authorities actually say themselves. Conversely, WikiIslam accepts what the religious texts and Muslim authorities say over the opinions and interpretations of third-party western commentators. | |||
In 2023, a content analysis of WikiIslam by Edin Kozaric of Oslo Metropolitan University and Torkel Brekke, Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo, was published following what the researchers described as "a serious effort to reinvent itself as a scientific, neutral, and unbiased website in several ways."<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|2}} Analysing how external websites had cited WikiIslam over many years, the researchers concluded that its articles had been "used to give legitimacy to arguments made on other websites, many of which contain Islamophobic messaging." Their analysis of the most widely disseminated WikiIslam articles found them "largely selective when it comes to topics covered, and to some extent selective in the choice of references." Some of the articles "could be said to espouse attitudes that are Islamophobic", though they noted "at the same time it is also important to underline that the articles often present alternative and conflicting opinions about the topics that are discussed." Kozaric and Brekke's overall impression of WikiIslam was that the information presented about Islam was "far from neutral"; their main concern was that "WikiIslam presents itself as an encyclopedic and scientific site without a political agenda and that it does not critically reflect upon how it can be used for serving other interests."<ref name="KozaricBrekke2023" />{{rp|16}} | |||
== |
==Notes== | ||
{{notelist}} | |||
== |
==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
== External links == | |||
# ↑ "Wikiislam.net", Alexa.com, accessed October 19, 2013. | |||
*{{official website|https://wikiislam.net/Main_Page}} | |||
# ↑ "Wikiislam.net/ Audience", Alexa.com, accessed November 28, 2011. | |||
# ↑ ], Misplaced Pages, accessed February 10, 2012. | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 08:00, 23 November 2024
Wiki covering selective topics on Islam and owned by Ex-Muslims of North America
Owner | Ex-Muslims of North America |
---|---|
Founder(s) | Ali Sina |
URL | wikiislam |
Launched | 4 September 2006; 18 years ago (2006-09-04) |
Current status | Active |
Content license | CC BY-NC 3.0 |
WikiIslam is an anti-Muslim and anti-Islam wiki. The website was founded by Ali Sina in 2006. Registered users may modify and edit its content; in 2015, the website was acquired by the Ex-Muslims of North America and underwent a major revision in 2020.
Overview
The website was registered on October 27, 2005 and launched on September 4, 2006. It was founded by Ali Sina, an Iranian-born Canadian ex-Muslim, and originally maintained by his organization, Faith Freedom International, part of the counter-jihad network. As of 2013, among the site's aim was to act in defence against a perceived "global threat" of Muslims and Islam; the site described its purpose as "collect facts relating to the criticism of Islam from valid Islamic sources" without the effect of " censorship" that is common in Misplaced Pages. It rejected concerns of Islamophobia by arguing that Islam has been proved to be a "dangerous ideology".
As a "community-edited website", the wiki was set to be edited and modified by (registered) approved netizens. As of 2018, information on (alleged) internal contradictions in the Quran, persecution of non-Muslims and ex-Muslims, follies of Muhammad etc. were held; a narrow focus is maintained on "violence, sexuality and gender conflicts". Also as of 2018, apostasy testimonies were featured too and the site held a list of 101 provocative questions which are to be asked of any Muslim to prove that Islam is not a "true religion," running in tune with the site's active encouragement to criticize Muslims. The same year, WikiIslam was noted to feature slurs about Muhammad. Translations of content into multiple languages are available. In December 2015, the Ex-Muslims of North America (EXMNA), a secularist organization, took ownership and operation of the site.
Around 2020, a major revision to WikiIslam took place with a stated aim to "provide accurate and accessible information from traditional and critical perspectives” on Islam, and stressing a "zero-tolerance policy on hateful, misleading, unencyclopedic, and polemical content." As of 2022, WikiIslam did not "meet all the requirements stated in their own vision document," although some content was in line with the new vision. Articles generally presented how Muslim scholars have addressed specific "questions or episodes in the history of Islam"; internal variations and differences among Muslim scholars are also "often presented." However, there is "seldom (if ever)" content that includes modern discussions or "progressive interpretations." In addition, there was a bias in the selection of topics covered on the website, some of which explicitly or implicitly linked Muslims with a non-rational worldview that is incompatible with a scientific outlook, and often tended to cast them or Islam in a negative light when voices of contemporary scholars or contextualisation of debates were lacking. WikiIslam continues to have "hardly any information that presents Muslims in a positive or neutral way."
Reception
In 2007, Göran Larsson, Professor of Religious Studies at University of Gothenburg, argued that WikiIslam is an Islamophobic web portal and that the stories on WikiIslam were selected only to show that Muslims are "ignorant, backward or even stupid". In a 2014 survey of "anti-Muslim websites", Larsson profiled WikiIslam's apparent aim as "present Islamic history, theology and practitioners in a way which leaves the reader with an exceedingly negative image of the faith". He repeated his position in 2018, citing WikiIslam as an example of an "anti-Muslim webpage."
In 2013, Daniel Enstedt and Larsson wrote that the website has been "often perceived as being anti-Muslim, if not Islamophobic," describing the then-present content on WikiIslam as part of a "negative and biased" representation of Islam that could "easily be turned into an important weapon in the hands of those who want to express anti-Muslim feelings"; the site propagated "an Islamophobic world view that present Islam and Muslims as diametrically opposite to all others." Both Enstedt and Larrson have contended WikiIslam's selection and presentation of Islamic topics to be "very one-dimensional" with "alternative interpretations seldom represented".
In 2019, Asma Uddin, an advisor on religious liberty to the OSCE and a fellow at the Aspen Institute, reiterated WikiIslam to be a "rampantly anti-Muslim website". The same year, Syaza Shukri, Professor of Political Sciences at International Islamic University Malaysia, deemed the lack of positive content on WikiIslam to demonstrate a "definite agenda": the promotion of a monolithic version of Islam—violent, oppressive, and unrepresentative of "how a majority of Muslims view their religion". Rabia Kamal, a cultural anthropologist based at University of San Francisco, finds WikiIslam to be of the many Islamophobic websites dedicated to "surveillance" of Islam and Muslims.
In 2023, a content analysis of WikiIslam by Edin Kozaric of Oslo Metropolitan University and Torkel Brekke, Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo, was published following what the researchers described as "a serious effort to reinvent itself as a scientific, neutral, and unbiased website in several ways." Analysing how external websites had cited WikiIslam over many years, the researchers concluded that its articles had been "used to give legitimacy to arguments made on other websites, many of which contain Islamophobic messaging." Their analysis of the most widely disseminated WikiIslam articles found them "largely selective when it comes to topics covered, and to some extent selective in the choice of references." Some of the articles "could be said to espouse attitudes that are Islamophobic", though they noted "at the same time it is also important to underline that the articles often present alternative and conflicting opinions about the topics that are discussed." Kozaric and Brekke's overall impression of WikiIslam was that the information presented about Islam was "far from neutral"; their main concern was that "WikiIslam presents itself as an encyclopedic and scientific site without a political agenda and that it does not critically reflect upon how it can be used for serving other interests."
Notes
- FFI has stated that its aim is to "unmask Islam and help Muslims leave ".
- As used on WikiIslam, to be "critical" has meant holding preconceived negative opinions of Muslims and Islam.
- ^ Larsson's latest publication on the site is from 2018 where he asks readers to consult his publications from 2007 and 2013 for scholarship on WikiIslam.
- Larsson's 2007 view was summarized by Ruth Tsuria, an expert on the intersection of digital media and religion: "Larsson argues that WikiIslam takes a closed attitude in its understanding of Islam, and so should be seen as an Islamophobic web portal." However, Larsson conceded that since WikiIslam contained a list of links to other websites—such as that of the Middle East Media Research Institute—, it was difficult to argue that all information posted on the site was Islamophobic.
References
- ^ Larsson, Göran (1 June 2007). "Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam". Contemporary Islam. 1 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2. ISSN 1872-0226. S2CID 144896607.
- ^ Enstedt, Daniel; Larsson, Göran (2013). "Telling the Truth about Islam? Apostasy Narratives and Representations of Islam on WikiIslam.net" (PDF). CyberOrient. 7 (1): 64–93. doi:10.1002/j.cyo2.20130701.0003. ISSN 1804-3194. Retrieved 12 July 2020.
- ^ Larsson, Göran (2014). "Islamophobia or Legitimate Concern? Contrasting Official and Populist Understanding of Opposition to Muslims". In Mays, Christin; Deland, Mats; Minkenberg, Michael (eds.). In the Tracks of Breivik: Far Right Networks in Northern and Eastern Europe. Vienna: Lit Verlag. pp. 155–66. ISBN 9783643905420. OCLC 881140905.
- ^ Uddin, Asma T. (2019). When Islam Is Not a Religion: Inside America's Fight for Religious Freedom (First Pegasus Books hardcover ed.). New York. ISBN 978-1643131740.
The rampantly anti-Muslim website, WikiIslam, connects Islam and pedophilia even more brazenly, 'Pedophilia is permitted in the Qur'an, was practiced by Prophet Muhammad and his companions, and some Muslims today continue to commit the crime, following their prophet's example.'
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Enstedt, Daniel (2018). "Understanding Religious Apostasy, Disaffiliation, and Islam in Contemporary Sweden". In van Nieuwkerk, Karin (ed.). Moving in and out of Islam (First ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-4773-1748-8.
Anti-Muslim rhetoric on internet sites such as WikiIslam.net ... and faithfreedom.org ... reproduce a negative image of religion that is associated with Islam.
- Khan, Nadia (Jan 2015). "American Muslims in the Age of New Media". In Smith, Jane; Haddad, Yvonne (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of American Islam. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199862634.013.005. ISBN 9780199862634.
American Muslim organizations use new media both to address issues internal to their community and to counter growing anti-Muslim sentiment. For example, in 2005, Wiki Islam debuted, claiming to provide a 'politically incorrect' alternative to Misplaced Pages.
- ^ Shukri, Syaza Farhana Mohamad (2019). "The Perception of Indonesian Youths toward Islamophobia: An Exploratory Study". Islamophobia Studies Journal. 5 (1): 61–75. doi:10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061. ISSN 2325-8381. JSTOR 10.13169/islastudj.5.1.0061. S2CID 213425625.
Larsson (2007) did a research on Islamophobia on the Internet, specifically the anti-Islam portal WikiIslam. Unlike Misplaced Pages, WikiIslam only produces content that are critical to Islam. While the owner does not consider the website to be a hate site, the fact that there is nothing positive about Islam on it proves that it has a definite agenda.... WikiIslam is of course promoting Islam as a monolithic religion that is violent and oppressive, and more importantly, does not represent how a majority of Muslims view their religion.
- ^ "Ex-Muslims of North America takes ownership and operation of WikiIslam". Ex-Muslims of North America. 2015-12-03. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
- ^ Kozaric, Edin; Brekke, Torkel (2023). "The case of WikiIslam: scientification of Islamophobia or legitimate critique of Islam?". Ethnic and Racial Studies: 1–19. doi:10.1080/01419870.2023.2268154. hdl:10852/109661. S2CID 264331620.
- Busher, Joel (2016). The Making of Anti-Muslim Protest: Grassroots Activism in the English Defence League. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781315661377.
- ^ Gardell, Mattias (2012). Islamofobi (in Swedish). Stockholm: Leopard förlag. ISBN 9789173434027.
WikiIslam – en 'islamkritisk encyklopedi' som skapades av antimuslimska cyberaktivister som slutit sig till att deras inlägg på Misplaced Pages 'censurerades' av politiskt korrekta redaktörer och motsades av muslimer som lade sig i samtalet om islam och muslimer – anser att 'termen islamofobi är avledande, uppeggande och ofta används för att förhindra mycket legitim kritik av islam'.
- ^ Larsson, Göran (2018-03-13). "Disputed, Sensitive and Indispensable Topics: The Study of Islam and Apostasy". Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. 30 (3): 201–226. doi:10.1163/15700682-12341435. ISSN 0943-3058.
For example, the anti-Muslim webpage WikiIslam (on this homepage, see Larsson 2007; Enstedt and Larsson 2013) simply concludes: 'The punishment for apostasy in the Islamic faith is death.'
- O'Brian, Peter (2018). "Islamophobia & Europhobia: Expanding Rhetorics of Exclusion". Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology & Cultural Studies. 11 (1): 16. ISSN 2066-768X.
- "Profile Ruth Tsuria". Seton Hall University. 2017-08-03. Retrieved 2021-12-26.
- Tsuria, Ruth (2013-01-01). "The video Three Things About Islam: Islamophobia online or a religious dialogue". Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis. 25: 225. doi:10.30674/scripta.67442. ISSN 2343-4937.
- Affairs, Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World. "Asma Uddin". berkleycenter.georgetown.edu. Retrieved 2021-12-26.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Kamal, Rabia (18 July 2022). "Muslims and Social Media in North America". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.899. ISBN 978-0-19-934037-8.
In fact, many Islamophobic websites have taken on the responsibility of nongovernmental surveillance as an element of their agenda. Internet hubs such as WikiIslam and websites such as Campus Watch, Jihad Watch, and thereligionofpeace.com are just a few of the digital platforms explicitly dedicated to the surveillance of Muslims and Islam both on- and offline.