Revision as of 17:37, 26 June 2022 editViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,672 editsm Reverted edits by 76.50.6.65 (talk) to last version by Kassandras1029Tag: Rollback← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:00, 5 March 2024 edit undo37.111.155.194 (talk) →Evaluation: ReplyTag: Reply |
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Brands|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Brands|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject California|class=C|importance=Low|la=Yes|la-importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject California|importance=Low|la=Yes|la-importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Companies|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Professional sound production|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Professional sound production|importance=Low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Beats Electronics/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Beats Electronics/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
|
|
|
|
The article “Beats Electronics” is written exceptionally well. I feel as though those who have contributed to the creation of this article have successfully created an effective lead section, incorporated only the relevant and key information, all meanwhile maintaining a neutral tone throughout the entirety of the article. My one and only complaint would be that I found it a bit difficult to follow the large number of key dates, such as investments and subsidiaries. I would suggest to possibly include a timeline to not only further facilitate the understanding of events in chronological order, but to also offer a quick overview of events that readers can quickly scan over. Great job! —-] (]) 05:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
The article “Beats Electronics” is written exceptionally well. I feel as though those who have contributed to the creation of this article have successfully created an effective lead section, incorporated only the relevant and key information, all meanwhile maintaining a neutral tone throughout the entirety of the article. My one and only complaint would be that I found it a bit difficult to follow the large number of key dates, such as investments and subsidiaries. I would suggest to possibly include a timeline to not only further facilitate the understanding of events in chronological order, but to also offer a quick overview of events that readers can quickly scan over. Great job! —-] (]) 05:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I have no any documents is confidential .I try to improve myself and make small business but high quality people and Clover Hill wont to distract myself ] (]) 22:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
The article “Beats Electronics” is written exceptionally well. I feel as though those who have contributed to the creation of this article have successfully created an effective lead section, incorporated only the relevant and key information, all meanwhile maintaining a neutral tone throughout the entirety of the article. My one and only complaint would be that I found it a bit difficult to follow the large number of key dates, such as investments and subsidiaries. I would suggest to possibly include a timeline to not only further facilitate the understanding of events in chronological order, but to also offer a quick overview of events that readers can quickly scan over. Great job! —-Kassandras1029 (talk) 05:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC)