| Revision as of 00:37, 27 February 2007 editNealparr (talk | contribs)6,895 editsm →Parapsychology article← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023 edit undoCycloneYoris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,964 edits Notification: listing of Rvvv at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="550" align="center" | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="left"|] ] ] ] ] | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |} | |||
| == Re: ] == | |||
| (in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--] (]|]) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| <div align="center"> | |||
| == Chhh listed at ] == | |||
| <div class="boilerplate" style="background-color:#f5e7b0; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding-top:6px; padding-right:6px; padding-left:33px; padding-bottom:6px; border: 1px solid #aaa; width:435px; align:center;"><div style="display:block; position:relative; left:-27px; width:20px; padding-top:17px; height:50px; float: left; clear: left;">]</div><div align="left">This user is a part of ''']''', which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the ]. If you would like to participate, you can visit the ], where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.</div></div> | |||
| ] | |||
| </div> | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Chhh'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| <div style="float: left; clear: left; width:235px; border-right-style:double; border-left-style:double; border-top-style:double; border-bottom-style:double; padding-top:20px; padding-right:20px; padding-left:20px; padding-bottom:20px; border-width:3px;"><font size="3" font color="ff0033" font face="arial">Please put all new content | |||
| <br /> | |||
| at the bottom of the page</font> | |||
| <br /><br /> | |||
| <font size="3" font color="ff0033" font face="">-Thanks </font></div> | |||
| <div style="float: right; clear: right; padding-left:10px; border-width:3px;"><table border='0' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='300'><tr><td> <font size="2" font color="b97600" font face="">You scored as <b>Cultural Creative</b>. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational.</font><br><br></td></tr></table><font face='Arial' size='1'></font></table> | |||
| <table border='0' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='300'><tr><td><table border='0' width='300' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Cultural Creative</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='94' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>94%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Postmodernist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='88' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>88%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Existentialist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='81' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>81%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Idealist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='63' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>63%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Modernist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='63' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>63%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Fundamentalist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='44' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>44%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Materialist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='31' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>31%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Romanticist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='25' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>25%</font></td></tr></td></tr></table><br><br><font face='Arial' size='1'></font></table> | |||
| </div> | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == "ESPPP" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17#Rvvv}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="display:block; position:absolute; left:13px; top:425px;width:235px; border-right-style:double; border-left-style:double; border-top-style:double; border-bottom-style:double; padding-top:20px; padding-right:20px; padding-left:20px; padding-bottom:20px; border-width:3px;"><font size="3" font color="674303" font face="arial"> '''Hi all,'''</font> | |||
| <font font color="674303" font face="arial">I live/work in Monument Valley Utah. It is wilderness, and I have a lot of time to study, especially Parapsychology.</font> | |||
| <font font color="674303" font face="arial">I'd be very happy to hear from you.</font> | |||
| ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 06:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </font></div> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your many '''excellent contributions''' to the parapsychology article as well as your many contributions to the area as a whole. - ] 23:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for your many '''outstanding contributions''' to paranormal articles. - ] <small> ] </small> 22:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| ==Come play== | |||
| LOL! I love it! Love the sandbox too, what a cool idea! Yes, I'd love to play! Fantastic! Hey, what happened to your barnstar? ] <small> ] </small> 06:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Because of the bandwidth problem? I see. Heck, I'm hoping for more barnstars myself...;) ] <small> ] </small> 06:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == parapsychology as a science == | |||
| All the proof that is needed is the fact that the AAAS is partnered with a noted parapsychology research group. | |||
| If America's most prestigious scientific scientific grouping supports the scientific nature of parapsychology research, then it is clearly and undeniably a science. | |||
| HOWEVER, while parapsychology is a science. Not all of its research/finding are scientific or supported by science. For example, the existence of EVP can be researched using science, and ''anomalies'' have been found using scientific methods for finding anomalies, it absolutely has not been rationalized using science and is not accepted as proven by science. | |||
| ] 07:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The fact that the AAAS supports the validity of parapsychology as a research field is all the proof that you need that it is a science. Else, try looking up the Ganzfeld experiment. It's had more mainstream coverage than most. | |||
| ] 07:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You could try looking at "An Introduction to Parapsychology" by Harvey Irwin. Irwin has lectured in parapsychology as a scientific field for 25 years at the university of New England and has a lot to say. Try reading chapter 17. It deals with both efforts to establish parapsychology as a science, and mainstream sciences reactions. | |||
| Also try looking at J B Rhine's efforts to ensure that parapsychology experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, and that they used credible methodologies. | |||
| ] 09:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You might also like to point out that parapsychology is "the scientific study of ....", not the "search for proof for.....". This means that mainstream scientists who uses science to debunk something paranormal, or to prove a previous parapsychology experiment is flawed, are themselves conducting a parapsychology experiment. | |||
| ] 09:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==EVP IV== | |||
| Told ya I didn't like the EVP article nor it's editorial disputes, and your last comments are exactly why. The entire thing is horrible, that's why I always stayed away from it. ] <small> ] </small> 07:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :2:51am eastern standard time here. No idea why I'm still up. I'm just a Wikimaniac, I guess...;) ] <small> ] </small> 07:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::"Casters of pearls", oh, man, I just cannot stop laughing about that one! LOL!!! ] <small> ] </small> 08:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| It would be great if you could come back to the EVP talk page and point out some weasel words and incoherent statements. I'm showing them a few, but it would be great to have your assistance...] <small> ] </small> 22:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I've got to go to the store. Can we remove the tags for now, and if the issues aren't addressed, then put them back? This seems to be a huge sore point with them. ] <small> ] </small> 22:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Unless you have an objection, since we're actively discussing the issues you raised, I'll temporarily remove the tags and put them back if they're not addressed to your satisfaction. Let me know if this is not ok. ] <small> ] </small> 22:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| No probs, the EVP article has been a bit of a problem even more than most. It seems tht we have been going round in circles for months and the different senses of EVP seems to never get resolved. I'm not at all sure how we're going to get the thing into a reasonable state.] 02:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Martin, to your point about someone not liking "is defined as", I don't see any problem with it. The skeptics will have a problem with it, because it's a clear statement, without skeptical qualifieres; but a clear statement from all views is absolutely necessary for NPOV - and since the actual basis for EVP is indeed from the view that it exists, and is from a paranormal source - that is the significant definition to start the article with. From the skeptical viewpoint, EVP is a mirage, false, and so EVP doesn't exist, thus there would be no article. Secondly, EVP hasn't been proven false. You can't base an article on those negative assumptions. That's what their entire argument started with, "nothing in science, therefore only popular culture can be used". Well, pop culture thinks it exists. ] <small> ] </small> 04:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wow!== | |||
| Thank you for the magnificent, moving barnstar!!! WOW! How did you know I've always wanted one of those! Really appreciated man...now, I'm getting tired...oh, wait..am I allowed? Do I lose my "tireless" barnstar if I get tired? Augh! Sincerely, thanks...! 08:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edward== | |||
| Nice analysis of Belbo's position! I think you clarified it nicely. ] <small> ] </small> 02:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::''Can't we get the John Edward pic back?'' | |||
| :I'm working on it. The original was put up by ] and disputed by wikidudeman. It's in licensing limbo at the moment. ] <small> ] </small> 05:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::''Till the next mediation over that word.'' | |||
| ::Definite ''word'', man. I'm sure it's not over, the 'other side' won't give it up until it says "John Edward is a fraud and a fake". Never ending battle for truth, justice and NPOV!! ] <small> ] </small> 07:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| What do you think of ]? I scanned it in from the book I own. Hard to get the colors right on it....] <small> ] </small> 08:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:John_Edward_Crossing_Over_Cover_Face_1.gif == | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
| # Go to ] and edit it to add <code><nowiki>{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}</nowiki></code>, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''. | |||
| # On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
| Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Replaceable --> ]≈<small>]</small> 22:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Regarding ]== | |||
| Well heck, I was just arguing a point that I thought was valid without realizing that others already had that idea and were talking about it. So far I've been asking where does it say that parapsychology must produce positive results to be a science, and here you go and find sources about that very thing! This would be a great contribution to the article! Great job. If anything, it will help the mediation which is probably where this is heading. | |||
| --''']''' <sup>(]|])</sup> 04:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Extrasensory Perception== | |||
| On ] (which I update too frequently) I have decided to open the file drawers belonging to Dean Radin at ''Extrasensory Perception.'' (Start from the beginning of the section.) There are a few citations missing. I hope to find these sources again. But I haven't made up my mind how hard I want to search. Here too, I tried to clarify my use of terms relating to mental health and the mind. It is not name calling. It is a somewhat educated observation. There is too much paranoia on the Misplaced Pages. "When you attack my beliefs you attack me." What's with that? Everything is an attack there are no such things as disagreement and challenge? I have seen you use the "us" and "them" labels, a bad sign. Perhaps you will be entertained by my weird style of magic. ] 26 Feb 2007 | |||
| ==Parapsychology article== | |||
| Would ArbCom take the case (I mean, after mediation)? Aren't their decisions binding? I want a ruleing on parapsychology as a science for the purposes of Misplaced Pages. Failed science or no. ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 23:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no idea. Neutrality is number 2 on the 5 pillar list ]. Number 5 is that there's no hard rules. So while I'm not totally familar with it, I doubt anything is actually "binding". What I'm shooting for is number 2. By attributing the definition to the Parapsychology Association, it is neutrally put. That is, you can either agree with the Parapsychology Association or not. With deeply controversial topics (like I said, the same debate going on here has been going on since the 70s), it's up to the reader to decide for themselves. We'll see how it goes. Are you happy with the current opening? | |||
| :--''']''' <sup>(]|])</sup> 00:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023
File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hampton11235 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: Astral projection
(in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--dchmelik (t|c) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Chhh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chhh. Since you had some involvement with the Chhh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Socratic barnstar.jpg
The file File:Socratic barnstar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
"ESPPP" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ESPPP. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#ESPPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
"Rvvv" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Rvvv has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17 § Rvvv until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)