Misplaced Pages

User:Moncrief: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:06, 15 March 2005 editMoncrief (talk | contribs)Administrators37,304 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:13, 30 June 2020 edit undoMoncrief (talk | contribs)Administrators37,304 editsNo edit summary 
(76 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Wikipedian since October 2003.
==Early life==


== Three major pet peeves ==
Moncrief is an ] man who was born in the U.S. state of ] in ]. When Moncrief was three years old, he and his parents moved to ], where they lived for approximately nine months. In ], Moncrief's mother - who was not getting along with Moncrief's father and who wanted to be separated from him - took Moncrief and moved to ], where she and Moncrief's father had met, had married, and had lived during the late ]. Moncrief's father followed and the three family members attempted, for a time, to live all together again. However, Moncrief's mother and father soon separated again (they ]d in ]) and Moncrief's father moved to a city approximately 40 miles away. Moncrief is an only child.


1) '''Not spelling out numbers from one to nine''', where it is appropriate to do so (and it almost always is). I'd love to eliminate every reference to "4 lakes" and "6 composers" on this site. It should be "four lakes" and "six composers." Numerals in Misplaced Pages articles, for numbers under ten, look tacky; we should expect more from Misplaced Pages.
== Education ==


2) '''US postal abbreviations of states''' in articles that aren't about, well, postal abbreviations. "Lexington, KY" means nothing to someone outside the United States, and it looks dreadful. It's an address on an envelope as requested by the US Postal Service; it's not a real place. SPELL OUT STATE NAMES. Or omit the state names altogether on the second reference. Postal abbreviations don't belong in an encyclopedia.
Moncrief went to a public elementary school - the same school from ], which he started in ] until the sixth grade, which he completed in ]. He then attended a private secondary school for grades seven through twelve (] - ]), located in another suburb about 18 miles from where he and his mother were living at the time. During this period, Moncrief and his mother moved to several residences within two suburban communities and his father continued to live separately from them but in the same metropolitan area.


3) ''']s''' (&). This is an encyclopedia. There isn't any excuse for being too lazy to spell out the word ''and''. Ampersands just don't cut it. The only exceptions are cases in which the ampersand is part of the original title, such as '']'', and even that one is arguable. If you're too lazy to spell out the word ''and'', then I'm not really sure why you're contributing to an encyclopedia.
Moncrief's favorite subjects in high school were history and English.


== ] ==
Moncrief attended college in the ] (] - ]), and continued to live in that region of the country until December ], at which time he moved back to California, where he had grown up.


My current passion is ]. Let's remember to make redirects! Redirects save time. They lessen the chances of two separate articles on the same topic. They help people find what they're looking for faster. And they're fun and easy! Here's to redirects!
== Redirects ==


This is how bad it is: unbelievably, there wasn't, until I fixed it, a redirect for the article on the famous artist Christo from the page "Christo" to the non-intuitive (for most users) actual article at ]. Check "What Links Here" at that article to see just how many (dozens and dozens) of links were showing up red simply because no one, incredibly, thought to do a redirect from "Christo".
My current passion is REDIRECTS. Let's remember to make redirects! Redirects save time. They lessen the chances of two separate articles on the same topic. They help people find what they're looking for faster. And they're fun and easy! Here's to redirects!


In my opinion, you can't overdo it on redirects, not unless you're doing redirects where there should rightly be a disambiguation page. And, even in those cases, a temporary redirect page, until someone puts together a dab page, is better than nothing at all. Several times I've come across duplicate articles, each under a separate namespace but about the same person or thing, and it's just because no one thought to do an obvious redirect.


Let me say it one more way: '''Creating redirects is part of writing a new Misplaced Pages article. If you haven't done redirects, you haven't finished the job!'''
== A Favorite Quote That is Relevant to Misplaced Pages ==


(Note: Since I wrote the above, I've been told there had been a Christo redirect, but that I just happened to come across the article at a time when it had been deleted, mistakenly, for about two weeks, as the namespace of the article moved. That makes me feel a bit better.)
"The Internet has created the most precise mirror of people as a whole that we've yet had. It is not a summary prepared by a social scientist or an élite think tank. It is not the hagiography of an era, condensed by a romantic idealist or a sneering cynic. It is the real us, available for direct inspection for the first time. Our collective window shades are now open. We see the mundanity, the avarice, the ugliness, the perversity, the loneliness, the love, the inspiration, the serendipity, and the tenderness that manifest in humanity. Seen in proportion, we can breath a sigh of relief. We are basically OK."

== ]==

More and more on Misplaced Pages I'm seeing this "notability" creature raise its ugly head, and I'm seeing the vague term defined more and more broadly. I fear that some users' obsession with notability -- or, more precisely, enforcing their standards of notability-- has the potential to turn Misplaced Pages into a place of two warring factions. I'm a firm believer in that now-tired but still-true cliche that "Misplaced Pages is not paper." What purpose does it serve to delete otherwise fact-based and readable articles about subjects that are supposedly "non-notable"? This is not, repeat not, a traditional encyclopedia, and we have the luxury to be able to include obscure and esoteric information that paper encyclopedias don't. I wouldn't actually call myself a rabid inclusionist -- I'm all for deleting vanity pages and the like -- but I've just seen too many examples lately, for my comfort, of people playing the "notability" card as a catch-all excuse to delete that which need not be deleted and that which does not harm Misplaced Pages.

Note: The "Arguments against deleting articles for non-notability" section of the article on notability I've linked above actually corresponds quite closely to my own beliefs on the subject.

== A favorite quote that is relevant to Misplaced Pages ==

"The Internet has created the most precise mirror of people as a whole that we've yet had. It is not a summary prepared by a social scientist or an elite think tank. It is not the hagiography of an era, condensed by a romantic idealist or a sneering cynic. It is the real us, available for direct inspection for the first time. Our collective window shades are now open. We see the mundanity, the avarice, the ugliness, the perversity, the loneliness, the love, the inspiration, the serendipity, and the tenderness that manifest in humanity. Seen in proportion, we can breathe a sigh of relief. We are basically OK."


- ] - ]


{{User en}} <BR>

{{user es-1}} <BR>

{{User Wiki age|day=27|month=10|year=2003}}
{{User wikipedia/Administrator}}

Latest revision as of 18:13, 30 June 2020

Wikipedian since October 2003.

Three major pet peeves

1) Not spelling out numbers from one to nine, where it is appropriate to do so (and it almost always is). I'd love to eliminate every reference to "4 lakes" and "6 composers" on this site. It should be "four lakes" and "six composers." Numerals in Misplaced Pages articles, for numbers under ten, look tacky; we should expect more from Misplaced Pages.

2) US postal abbreviations of states in articles that aren't about, well, postal abbreviations. "Lexington, KY" means nothing to someone outside the United States, and it looks dreadful. It's an address on an envelope as requested by the US Postal Service; it's not a real place. SPELL OUT STATE NAMES. Or omit the state names altogether on the second reference. Postal abbreviations don't belong in an encyclopedia.

3) Ampersands (&). This is an encyclopedia. There isn't any excuse for being too lazy to spell out the word and. Ampersands just don't cut it. The only exceptions are cases in which the ampersand is part of the original title, such as Laverne & Shirley, and even that one is arguable. If you're too lazy to spell out the word and, then I'm not really sure why you're contributing to an encyclopedia.

Redirects

My current passion is REDIRECTS. Let's remember to make redirects! Redirects save time. They lessen the chances of two separate articles on the same topic. They help people find what they're looking for faster. And they're fun and easy! Here's to redirects!

This is how bad it is: unbelievably, there wasn't, until I fixed it, a redirect for the article on the famous artist Christo from the page "Christo" to the non-intuitive (for most users) actual article at Christo and Jeanne-Claude. Check "What Links Here" at that article to see just how many (dozens and dozens) of links were showing up red simply because no one, incredibly, thought to do a redirect from "Christo".

In my opinion, you can't overdo it on redirects, not unless you're doing redirects where there should rightly be a disambiguation page. And, even in those cases, a temporary redirect page, until someone puts together a dab page, is better than nothing at all. Several times I've come across duplicate articles, each under a separate namespace but about the same person or thing, and it's just because no one thought to do an obvious redirect.

Let me say it one more way: Creating redirects is part of writing a new Misplaced Pages article. If you haven't done redirects, you haven't finished the job!

(Note: Since I wrote the above, I've been told there had been a Christo redirect, but that I just happened to come across the article at a time when it had been deleted, mistakenly, for about two weeks, as the namespace of the article moved. That makes me feel a bit better.)

Notability

More and more on Misplaced Pages I'm seeing this "notability" creature raise its ugly head, and I'm seeing the vague term defined more and more broadly. I fear that some users' obsession with notability -- or, more precisely, enforcing their standards of notability-- has the potential to turn Misplaced Pages into a place of two warring factions. I'm a firm believer in that now-tired but still-true cliche that "Misplaced Pages is not paper." What purpose does it serve to delete otherwise fact-based and readable articles about subjects that are supposedly "non-notable"? This is not, repeat not, a traditional encyclopedia, and we have the luxury to be able to include obscure and esoteric information that paper encyclopedias don't. I wouldn't actually call myself a rabid inclusionist -- I'm all for deleting vanity pages and the like -- but I've just seen too many examples lately, for my comfort, of people playing the "notability" card as a catch-all excuse to delete that which need not be deleted and that which does not harm Misplaced Pages.

Note: The "Arguments against deleting articles for non-notability" section of the article on notability I've linked above actually corresponds quite closely to my own beliefs on the subject.

A favorite quote that is relevant to Misplaced Pages

"The Internet has created the most precise mirror of people as a whole that we've yet had. It is not a summary prepared by a social scientist or an elite think tank. It is not the hagiography of an era, condensed by a romantic idealist or a sneering cynic. It is the real us, available for direct inspection for the first time. Our collective window shades are now open. We see the mundanity, the avarice, the ugliness, the perversity, the loneliness, the love, the inspiration, the serendipity, and the tenderness that manifest in humanity. Seen in proportion, we can breathe a sigh of relief. We are basically OK."

- Jaron Lanier


enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.


es-1Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.


21YThis Wikipedian joined Misplaced Pages on October 27, 2003 (21 years, 2 months, 1 week and 3 days ago).
This user is an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)
Categories: