| Revision as of 03:54, 19 October 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to Talk:Popular Front of India/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:51, 5 January 2025 edit undoRavensfire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers88,947 editsm rv sockTag: Rollback |
| (37 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=90|archive_units=days|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
{{Indian English}} |
|
{{Indian English}} |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa}} |
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Banner Shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject India|class=c|importance=low|politics=yes|politics-importance=mid|assess-date=May 2012}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Islam|class=c|importance=High}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Discrimination |class=c |importance=High}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Organizations|class=c|importance=Mid}} |
|
| ⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{Article discretionary sanctions|ipa}} |
|
|
{{oldafdfull |
|
{{oldafdfull |
|
| date = February 20, 2007 |
|
| date = February 20, 2007 |
|
| result = '''keep''' |
|
| result = '''keep''' |
|
| votepage = Popular Front of India |
|
| votepage = Popular Front of India |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C| |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|politics=yes|politics-importance=mid|assess-date=May 2012}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=High}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=High}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive}} |
|
⚫ |
|algo = old(365d) |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
| ⚫ |
|counter = 2 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
⚫ |
|counter = 4 |
| ⚫ |
|algo = old(20d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Popular Front of India/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Popular Front of India/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 June 2024 == |
|
==Recent removals== |
|
|
I have undone the recent removals by Venkat TL given the large number of objections raised in above sections. It is not justifiable to remove sourced content only because it is critical of PFI. Removing allegations because they haven't ended up in conviction shouldn't be done unless the information is itself incorrect or it comes from improper source but we are not seeing that here. <span style="font-family:Monospace;color:black">>>> ].]</span> 11:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
:@] You are not allowed to restore ] violations and violations of ]. The article was a mess and I wonder how much of this was added by you. If you restore or edit war over this, I will report this. ] (]) 11:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Pfi was not formed to counter Hindus but to oppose Hindus and establish Islamist supremacy and to subdue others . It's written in their own charter that they want to make india and Islamic state by 2047 ] (]) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> The current statement is supported by reliable sources. <span style="font-family:monospace;">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ]) 09:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2024 == |
|
::You need to describe which "BLP" violation happened. The version which I restored has been stable for months before you started to remove content that happened to be critical of this organization. <span style="font-family:Monospace;color:black">>>> ].]</span> 11:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::@] naming of multiple individuals accused of crime without convictions. ] (]) 11:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Can you cite the specific examples? If no arrest happened then we can remove those particular names. Conviction is not necessary as long as the text is clearly stating it as mere allegation. <span style="font-family:Monospace;color:black">>>> ].]</span> 11:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::@] So you are telling me that you restored everything without even checking if the content that you have restored agrees with the policies of Misplaced Pages or not? and want me to point them out for you? I believe this grossly irresponsible behavior. Please look at my edit summaries, in page history, for example look at ], ], ] Also see ] that says "''The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.''". If you believe that I had wrongly removed something that you believe was appropriate for the article. Please let me know. Do not do blanket reverts like you did here ]. ] (]) 12:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::], just an illuminating comment: your construction of the said policy leaves a lot to be desired. These are essentially your edits that have come under the purview of editorial dispute and you should be the first one to make efforts to comply with ] in order to facilitate consensus building...rather than engender and partake in an edit war. ] (]) 12:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Diffs are the edits where I have removed content that clearly violates the policy. And Extorc added them in ]. Are you saying They are in compliance with policy? All of them? which? Please follow the Policy about, '''] and ]'''. No discussion is needed to remove them. But consensus is needed to restore them. ] (]) 12:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
::::::::There is no BLP violation. No I didn't "restored everything without even checking", but because the content existed for months and was vetted by not only me but also {{U|Kautilya3}}. |
|
|
|
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Creation of an Islamic State in India", please add this: The PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047 as per the ].<ref name="e270">{{cite web | last=Ramdas | first=P | title=PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047: NIA | website=The New Indian Express | date=26 June 2024 | url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2024/Jun/26/pfi-wanted-to-establish-islamic-rule-in-india-by-2047-nia-3 | access-date=2 October 2024}}</ref> ] (]) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::::::] was a bad removal because the content talked about ED booking PFI for money-laundering and finding 'financial links' between PFI and anti-CAA protests. ] was even worse and your explanation read like ] because you haven't provided a source which could prove the sting operation to be false. ] is just the same because the content is treating the those allegations as only allegations and talking about charges and arrests. It is completely fine. |
|
|
|
:11 days have passed since I made this request. How do I get someone to respond or carry out my request?-] (]) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::::::You are not allowed to reinstate your problematic edits until you have gained consensus. You made the mass removal and your edits were reverted. Now you are supposed to gain consensus instead of edit warring. That said, you are not in the position to cite ] especially when your explanations are without any basis. <span style="font-family:Monospace;color:black">>>> ].]</span> 13:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Done sorry for the delay.] (]) 17:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::::::The article is obviously in a very poor state, most of it is just an indiscriminate collection of allegations picked out of statements from politicians, police, etc with whatever source one could find. Can you not edit war and keep restoring it? The article needs to summarise the allegations rather than be a page about allegations that it is at present. <span style="background-color:#B2BEB5;padding:2px 12px 2px 12px;font-size:10px">] <sub>]</sub></span> 14:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::{{U|Akshaypatill}}, {{U|Vsa111}}, {{U|Extorc}}, {{U|DogeChungus}}, {{U|Kautilya3}}, {{u|ChandlerMinh}}, {{u|Rejoy2003}}, {{u|Phoenix14061990}}, {{noping|Venkat TL}}, removed a lot of sentences on 23rd September, please restore what you feel was not original research.-] (]) 14:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::] You really need to double check before you ping people unnecessarily. I never edited on 23rd September. The day the organisation was banned that's on 28 September is when I had contributed. And it was more of addition and less of deletion. Added to this, I deleted only the common wikilinks and general fixes. No statement or anything important related were deleted. ] 15:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::{{u|Rejoy2003}}, I think you misunderstood. I merely requested you and some others to restore what {{noping|Venkat TL}} removed on 23 September. {{U|Extorc}}, has mentioned what was removed (see above).-] (]) 16:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2024 (2) == |
|
== Past Tense == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
I think the terminology should be changed to the past tense because it was banned yesterday and I think the end date should be added in the info box. ] (]) 12:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Links to terrorist organizations", please change this sentence, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict" to, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict, due to threats by the PFI". ] (]) 16:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:11 days have passed since I made this request. How do I get someone to respond or carry out my request?-] (]) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Grammatical error? == |
|
|
|
Very sorry for the delay.] (]) 17:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{re|Pharaoh of the Wizards}} I see that you have just copied and pasted the whole thing but you were supposed to avoid copying the first bit, that is, the sentence to be replaced. Please delete the old sentence now (and add links where they are needed).-] (]) 19:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
"Popular Front of India (PFI) is a Indian Muslim political organisation, that engages in a radical and exclusivist style of Muslim minority politics." |
|
|
|
:Done hopefully got it right this time.] (]) 19:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::{{re|Pharaoh of the Wizards}} Please remove the inverted commas and add a full stop at the end of the sentence.-] (]) 03:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
Should be it.. |
|
|
|
:Done hopefully it is right now.] (]) 03:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
"Popular Front of India (PFI) is an Indian Muslim political organisation, that engages in a radical and exclusivist style of Muslim minority politics."? |
|
|
|
|
|
I know it's a little but it disturbs me a lot ] (]) 07:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:Yes, an unfortunate grammatical error that likely was introduced during the recent spree of edits. Thanks for pointing it out, IP! Fixed. ] (]) 07:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Poor citations throughout == |
|
|
|
|
|
Attribution of "radicalism" to any group that is Islamic in nature, especially in light of a fascist state, without very clear backing with violent events initiated solely by the group is already revealing of the subject nature of this. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Outlook link (currently citation 20) doesn't work but the text links the group to Al Qaeda. This is again typical of the far right trolls in India to use Islamophobic ideas en masse to falsify narratives online. |
|
|
|
|
|
Citation 19 is a paper but you cannot find the reference to Taliban or Al Qaeda. ] (]) 11:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:@] you are absolutely correct. ] (]) 12:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2022 == |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Please change this sentence in the lead, "It was banned by the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) on 28 September 2022 for a period of five years." to, " it was banned by the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) on 28 September 2022 for a period of five years for anti-social activities."- ] (]) 00:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 11:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:: Then please change it to......"it was banned by the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) on 28 September 2022 for a period of five years for unlawful activities." with as a source.-] (]) 14:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Do not post extraneous links. The very invocation of the UAPA law implies the bit that you desire us to add again. The article does a good job at elucidating the said activities in its main body. Its lead is not the place for hair-splitting. So that's a no again. ] (]) 14:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
Pfi was not formed to counter Hindus but to oppose Hindus and establish Islamist supremacy and to subdue others . It's written in their own charter that they want to make india and Islamic state by 2047 Abraca21 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Creation of an Islamic State in India", please add this: The PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047 as per the NIA. QueSera1 (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Links to terrorist organizations", please change this sentence, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict" to, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict, due to threats by the PFI". QueSera1 (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The current statement is supported by reliable sources. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 09:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)