Talk:Wind power: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:05, 21 October 2022 editChidgk1 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions60,271 edits →Should the "Impact on environment and landscape" section be moved to lead of main article and excerpted back here?: 3rd opinion?← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 00:35, 28 November 2024 edit undoRCraig09 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users18,831 edits Undid revision 1259952898 by 2402:4000:1380:4BEF:180B:F8B1:F80B:713A (talk)Tag: Undo
(47 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talk header\|search=yes~~\|archive_age=2\|archive_units=months\|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III~~}}		{{Talk header\|search=yes}}
	{{Vital article\|level=3\|topic=Technology\|class=B}}
	{{Article history		{{Article history
	\|action1=GAN		\|action1=GAN
Line 14:		Line 13:
	\|currentstatus=DGA		\|currentstatus=DGA
	}}		}}
	{{WikiProject banner shell\|1=		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|vital=yes\|1=
	{{WikiProject Environment~~\|class=B~~ \|importance=high \|sustainability=y}}		{{WikiProject Environment\|importance=high \|sustainability=y}}
	{{WikiProject Energy~~\|class=B~~ \|importance=top}}		{{WikiProject Energy\|importance=top}}
	{{WikiProject Climate change~~\|class=B~~\|importance=Top}}		{{WikiProject Climate change\|importance=Top}}
	{{WikiProject Physics~~\|class=B~~ \|importance=mid \|fluid-dynamics=yes }}		{{WikiProject Physics\|importance=mid \|fluid-dynamics=yes }}
	{{WikiProject Mills ~~\|class=B~~ \|importance=high ~~\|b1=y\|b2=y\|b3=y\|b4=y\|b5=y\|b6=y~~ }}		{{WikiProject Mills \|importance=high }}
	{{WP1.0\|class=B\|b1=y\|b2=y\|b3=y\|b4=y\|b5=y\|b6=y\|importance=Low\|category=category\|VA=yes}}
	}}		}}
	{{copied\|from=Wind turbine\|from_oldid=1026977172\|to=Wind power\|date={{date\|2021-08-17}}\|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wind_power&diff=1039256031&oldid=1037341105}}		{{copied\|from=Wind turbine\|from_oldid=1026977172\|to=Wind power\|date={{date\|2021-08-17}}\|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wind_power&diff=1039256031&oldid=1037341105}}
Line 34:		Line 32:
	\|algo = old(60d)		\|algo = old(60d)
	\|archive = Talk:Wind power/Archive %(counter)d		\|archive = Talk:Wind power/Archive %(counter)d
			}}
			{{Broken anchors\|links=
			* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (Terminology) ]. <!-- {"title":"Terminology","appear":null,"disappear":{"revid":1029512780,"parentid":1025923455,"timestamp":"2021-06-20T12:46:20Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} -->
	}}		}}

			== Should non-electricity be in History section? ==
	==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
	] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available ]. Peer reviewers: ].

			@] You tagged because “The article seems to be exclusively about producing electricity from wind power, but then history section talks about windmills and sails” so you think that should be removed from history? Or if not what do you suggest? ] (]) 14:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
	{{small\|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 13:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
	== habitat loss in lead ==

			:Perhaps it should be removed from history and the page on ] would explain it only. More can be included on the development of the electricity producing wind turbine over time and what companies were involved on the Wind Power page history section. Also, should the definition be revised to Wind Power is the process of generating energy from the wind as apposed to useful work? (the short description of the article is about producing electricity) Just my thoughts. ] (]) 00:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
	Should we remove ", which can lead to "industrialization of the countryside" and habitat loss." from the lead because:
			::(or people involved) ] (]) 00:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

			:I think we can keep the information about historical use of wind power, but we need to be explicit from the lead that this article only deals with electricity production. The history section should then reflect this, briefly talking about pre-electricity uses but then focusing on the history of wind power for electricity production (which is mostly what it already does actually) --] (]) 09:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
	1) Most new European wind power is far offshore I think - cite 5 seems re Europe mainly
			::I have excerpted - feel free to revert and solve the problem your way if you prefer ] (]) 15:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

			== No legitimate source for the claim that Hammurabi had a plan to use wind power ==
	2) Offshore windpower creates habitat with foundations as far as I know. So there ought to be studies cited in the body text estimating whether there is a net loss or gain of habitat I think. After that it could be summarized in the lead if significant

			I was interested in the information that Hammurabi might have used wind power and tried to find more details only to discover that every reference I found about this (on Misplaced Pages or otherwise) ultimately cites the 1976 book ''The Generation of electricity by wind power'' by E. Golding which has a single throwaway line about it and which itself only cites ''The Story of the Rotor'' by Anton Flettner from 1926, which has a single throwaway line with no source whatsoever.
	] (]) 18:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

			the Golding book:
	{{u\|Asarlaí}} OK I accept your point that the sentence refers to onshore. But is habitat loss significant compared to other causes of habitat loss? ] (]) 11:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
			https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Generation_of_Electricity_by_Wind_Po/lRojAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Hammurabi

			the Flettner book:
	By all means, delete any reference to blatant existing & future ruination of scenery, both inland and looking out from ocean shores (30+ mile visibility offsets are often impractical). It's all about selling these huge machines as "green" when they're clearly industrial & invasive. Wind turbines also show no real evidence of flattening the global CO2 curve (fossil fuels build them, plus Jevons paradox when people think they can waste "clean" electricity). https://falseprogress.home.blog/2016/08/29/wind-turbines-desecrate-nature/ <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			https://books.google.com/books?id=W99NAAAAMAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&vq=hammurabi&dq=flettner%20the%20story%20of%20the%20rotor&pg=PA95#v=snippet&q=hammurabi&f=false

			I have only just created an account to post this and can't edit the page myself since it's protected, but it seems to me that this information has no real source and should be removed? If so can someone with access remove it? ] (]) 15:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
	== It's fair to say, they can cause premature death in PEOPLE. ==

			== Economics and policy sections seem incomplete ==
	At least these GIANT turbines! Should as this is the case here NOT AND NEVER combined with:
	* strict military grade RF devices of any kind and design
	* MASERs (microwaves-operated LASERs, as a LASER uses light, a MASER uses microwaves/RF!)
	* Smart meters
	* illegal antenna setups of any kind

			In the current version, the 'Economics' section is very limited. It mentions costs but fails to mention the value of the electricity generated by wind power plant. I suggest adding a few sentences and linking to the 'Merit Order' page, which describes the value problem of variable renewable energy in detail.
	If else wind power usage causes premature death in people, I do not know!
	But the 5G in Gateshead was ENSURED to cause it. Reasons why:
	* illegal antenna designs for LED street lights 5G (maybe not the rest?!)
	* 450 Nanometers frequency in use in the lamp light part (this frequency can cause eye cancer in people! and prostate cancer in the males!)
	--] (]) 13:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

			Likewise, the content of the 'Central Government' subsection under 'Politics' is very limited and I also found it misleading. The references are almost exclusively referring to offshore wind. The first sentence seem to indicate that new installations are "generally subsidy free", but I believe this refer to offshore wind power only. I suggest rewriting this section completely, shift focus to both onshore and offshore wind power, and broaden the geographical scope. ] (]) 11:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
	== Should the "Impact on environment and landscape" section be moved to lead of main article and excerpted back here? ==

			== Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2024 ==
	That would have the advantage it would be less work to keep up to date I guess - for example I might trim it slightly and add a couple of sentences specifically about offshore ] (]) 10:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

			{{edit semi-protected\|Wind power\|answered=yes}}
	:I disagree. I don't see anything in the section that needs constantly updated? I also disagree that the section needs trimmed. It's already one of the shortest in the article and is concise, relevant and well-sourced. So it's already a snippet of the main article, which is much longer. ~] 13:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
			Economcis = Economics ] (]) 07:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
	::Ah I did not mean to make it shorter in the long run but to trim a bit to add new info. Originally the info was in 3 places but I recently combined the lead of the main article with ] As offshore wind power is growing so fast nowadays I feel the emphasis should be a little more on the offshore to keep it relevant - for example presumably there will be research on whether floating is more environmentally friendly than concrete-based which can first be detailed in the body of the main article and then summarized in the lead. So I think it would be good for those kind of updates to automatically come through here. ] (]) 15:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
			:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> 💜 <span style="border-radius:4px;background:#edf"> ] </span> ] - 07:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
	:::I welcome more info being added, but I don't think info needs to be removed first - the ''numbers'' could be trimmed however. Offshore wind power might be growing, but the article says there is much more on-land wind power right now, so we should focus slightly more on that. ~] 08:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

	~~Anyone~~ ~~else~~ ~~got an opinion for or against excerpting?~~ ] (]) 13:05, 21 ~~October~~ ~~2022~~ (UTC)		:... - ] (]) 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:35, 28 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wind power article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 2 months

Wind power was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 10, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
November 10, 2021	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This

level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment: Sustainability High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Misplaced Pages:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Energy Top‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Mills High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Wind turbine was copied or moved into Wind power with this edit on 17 August 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

] The anchor (Terminology) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Should non-electricity be in History section?

@Ita140188 You tagged because “The article seems to be exclusively about producing electricity from wind power, but then history section talks about windmills and sails” so you think that should be removed from history? Or if not what do you suggest? Chidgk1 (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps it should be removed from history and the page on history of wind power would explain it only. More can be included on the development of the electricity producing wind turbine over time and what companies were involved on the Wind Power page history section. Also, should the definition be revised to Wind Power is the process of generating energy from the wind as apposed to useful work? (the short description of the article is about producing electricity) Just my thoughts. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

(or people involved) Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

I think we can keep the information about historical use of wind power, but we need to be explicit from the lead that this article only deals with electricity production. The history section should then reflect this, briefly talking about pre-electricity uses but then focusing on the history of wind power for electricity production (which is mostly what it already does actually) --Ita140188 (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

I have excerpted - feel free to revert and solve the problem your way if you prefer Chidgk1 (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

No legitimate source for the claim that Hammurabi had a plan to use wind power

I was interested in the information that Hammurabi might have used wind power and tried to find more details only to discover that every reference I found about this (on Misplaced Pages or otherwise) ultimately cites the 1976 book The Generation of electricity by wind power by E. Golding which has a single throwaway line about it and which itself only cites The Story of the Rotor by Anton Flettner from 1926, which has a single throwaway line with no source whatsoever.

the Golding book: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Generation_of_Electricity_by_Wind_Po/lRojAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Hammurabi

the Flettner book: https://books.google.com/books?id=W99NAAAAMAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&vq=hammurabi&dq=flettner%20the%20story%20of%20the%20rotor&pg=PA95#v=snippet&q=hammurabi&f=false

I have only just created an account to post this and can't edit the page myself since it's protected, but it seems to me that this information has no real source and should be removed? If so can someone with access remove it? Minovi (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Economics and policy sections seem incomplete

In the current version, the 'Economics' section is very limited. It mentions costs but fails to mention the value of the electricity generated by wind power plant. I suggest adding a few sentences and linking to the 'Merit Order' page, which describes the value problem of variable renewable energy in detail.

Likewise, the content of the 'Central Government' subsection under 'Politics' is very limited and I also found it misleading. The references are almost exclusively referring to offshore wind. The first sentence seem to indicate that new installations are "generally subsidy free", but I believe this refer to offshore wind power only. I suggest rewriting this section completely, shift focus to both onshore and offshore wind power, and broaden the geographical scope. Tove-88 (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Economcis = Economics 2603:8000:D300:3650:B089:CD81:58FB:92D (talk) 07:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 💜 melecie talk - 07:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Done... - Adolphus79 (talk) 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Categories: