Misplaced Pages

User talk:Amaury: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:44, 17 December 2022 view sourceMagical Golden Whip (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,214 edits Credits: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:09, 10 January 2025 view source Amaury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers98,513 editsmNo edit summary 
(207 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<templatestyles src="User:Amaury/styles.css" />
{{User:Tkgd2007/Userboxes/My time|-7}}


<div style="color: #FFFFFF; background: #001932; border: 5px solid #000000; padding: 1%;">
{{clear}}

{{editnotice
| header = Welcome to my talk page!
| headerstyle = text-align: center;
| text = Today is {{#time: l, F j, Y|now-8 hours}}<br />The current time is {{#time: g:i A|now-8 hours}} (PST)
| textstyle = color: #FFFFFF; background-color: #324B64; border: 1px solid #000000; font-weight: bold; font-size: 200%; text-align: center;
}}

{{editnotice
| header = Attention!
| headerstyle = color: #FFFF00;
| text = Due to persistent disruption by an immature block-evading IP, this page has been indefinitely semi-protected. Newly registered users and IPs are not able to post on this talk page. ] • 07:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
| textstyle = color: #FFFFFF; background-color: #324B64; border: 1px solid #000000; font-weight: bold; font-size: 200%; text-align: center;
}}


== Archive Statistics == == Archive Statistics ==
Line 7: Line 21:
* The numbers in the cells indicate how many total discussions there are for each year, each month, and overall. * The numbers in the cells indicate how many total discussions there are for each year, each month, and overall.


{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" {| class="wikitable"
|- |-
! Month
! style="text-align: left;" | Month
! 2008 ! 2008
! ] ! ]
Line 25: Line 39:
! ] ! ]
! ] ! ]
! ]
! style="background-color: #FFFFE0;" | Total
! ]
! ]
! Total
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | January | January
| – | –
| 12 | 12
Line 43: Line 60:
| 3 | 3
| 6 | 6
| 0
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''82'''
| 2
|
| 84
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | February | February
| – | –
| 13 | 13
Line 61: Line 81:
| 5 | 5
| 2 | 2
| 1
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''103'''
| 1
|
| 105
|- |-
| March
| style="text-align: left;" | March
| – | –
| 11 | 11
Line 79: Line 102:
| 4 | 4
| 1 | 1
| 4
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''127'''
| 0
|
| 131
|- |-
| April
| style="text-align: left;" | April
| – | –
| 20 | 20
Line 97: Line 123:
| 5 | 5
| 2 | 2
| 1
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''146'''
| 1
|
| 148
|- |-
| May
| style="text-align: left;" | May
| – | –
| 23 | 23
Line 115: Line 144:
| 1 | 1
| 5 | 5
| 0
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''128'''
| 1
|
| 129
|- |-
| June
| style="text-align: left;" | June
| – | –
| 14 | 14
Line 133: Line 165:
| 9 | 9
| 4 | 4
| 4
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''128'''
| 2
|
| 134
|- |-
| July
| style="text-align: left;" | July
| – | –
| 20 | 20
Line 151: Line 186:
| 2 | 2
| 5 | 5
| 2
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''128'''
| 1
|
| 131
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | August | August
| – | –
| 8 | 8
Line 169: Line 207:
| 0 | 0
| 2 | 2
| 1
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''116'''
| 0
|
| 117
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | September | September
| – | –
| 8 | 8
Line 187: Line 228:
| 7 | 7
| 5 | 5
| 3
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''71'''
| 1
|
| 75
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | October | October
| – | –
| 24 | 24
Line 204: Line 248:
| 1 | 1
| 6 | 6
| 8
| 2
| 0
| |
| 104
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''94'''
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | November | November
| – | –
| 11 | 11
Line 222: Line 269:
| 5 | 5
| 3 | 3
| 4
| 5
| 5
| |
| 75
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''58'''
|- |-
| style="text-align: left;" | December | December
| 0 | 0
| 9 | 9
Line 239: Line 289:
| 8 | 8
| 10 | 10
| 6
| 6
| 3
| 6 | 6
| |
| 103
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''82'''
|- |-
| Total
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''Total'''
| 0
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''0'''
| 173
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''173'''
| 163
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''163'''
| 0
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''0'''
| 13
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''13'''
| 69
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''69'''
| 0
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''0'''
| 154
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''154'''
| 115
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''115'''
| 158
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''158'''
| 152
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''152'''
| 120
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''120'''
| 72
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''72'''
| 51
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''51'''
| 50
| style="background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''32'''
| 26
| style="color: #FF0000; background-color: #FFFFE0; text-align: center;" | '''1,272'''
| 20
|
| 1,336
|} |}


== October 2022 == == January 2025 ==
=== ] templates ===
I understand why you reversed the templates. However, I'm only trying to make things simpler by removing some of the redirects. For example: Instead of "Template:Disney XD original series," it'll just be "Template:Disney XD." I figured the sister channels don't really need specific titles. ] (]) 16:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

=== '']'' ===
Are you still watching this one? Recent edits by IP are very strange – removing the airdates (and ratings?) columns from the season #1 episodes tables (I oppose that), and then trying to add a huge new ratings table to the bottom of the article. If you are still watching this one, please try to keep an eye on it. Thanks. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 14:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

: OK, now I would appreciate your backup here, as the IP is still at it. Thank you. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 12:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
:: Thanks for that. I have now left a warning on the IP's talk page – they should be discussing their proposed changes, or at least ask why they are being reverted. If they don't do that, then we know they're not serious about editing. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 19:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
::: {{Re|IJBall}} Being "confusing" is not a sufficient explanation. And it's not confusing, anyway. ] • 19:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

=== User ] ===
<small>'''''Related discussion: ] from ]'''''</small>

{{Re|IJBall}} They are at it again. ] • 16:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
: Some of those edits are OK, but is very problematic. I'm starting to wonder if this is a ] issue, or a ] issue. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 18:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
: I have left a followup message on their Talk page. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 18:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
{{od|1}} Please be aware of recent edits at ] – would appreciate you keeping an eye out here too. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 16:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

==='']'' ===
See: ! --] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
: {{U|Starforce13}}!!! ] • 22:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
:: I saw it earlier today and I'm still shocked. Of all Disney shows, I still can't believe ''Bunk'd'' is the one that gets to be the longest running. But at least, I'm glad the new Disney regime is letting shows last more than 3-4 seasons.— ] 23:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
::: {{Re|Starforce13}} We of course have ''Raven's Home'' as the runner-up. ] • 23:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
:::: Yeah, and hopefully we see more of these going forward.— ] 23:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
::::: {{Re|Starforce13}} I'm still sad by the casting changes in ''Raven's Home''. I felt more stories could have been told with Nina, Levi, Tess, and even Chelsea. Like how ''Boy Meets World'' continued after high school and followed the characters' college lives. Although I do like the new main characters in ''Raven's Home''. While I wish they would have kept Xander, Jorge, and Tiffany, the Ross children leaving camp after the third season made sense as both the actors and characters were growing up and it was time to hand over the counselor reigns to other characters, like Destiny. It's akin to '']'' characters leaving after they graduate, with the exception of Eli due to how popular Eclare was. Besides Eli, Emma and some other characters from their inception in the first season were the only other characters to appear after graduating high school. And I'm only talking about graduating characters, I'm not talking about characters who disappeared before graduating, some of which were just written off with no explanation—Dave and Wesley come to mind. ] • 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::: Yeah, with long running shows, especially those set in a school, like ''Degrassi'', you have to keep replacing some of the cast to keep it realistic and let those who want to move on leave. HBO Max was going to do a new Degrassi and I was so excited to see if anyone from ''Degrassi: The Next Class'' will return, but I don't think that show will happen now. I think ''Bunk'd'' could have kept Tiffany/Jorge if they wanted and they could have had them grow to become CITs like what they did with Destiny. But honestly, replacing the non-Ross kids from S1/S2 with Destiny's group made the show so much better. So, I won't complain. I wish the new season didn't replace the characters again though - especially Ava. She and Gwen were the best recent additions and I understand why Gwen had to leave but Ava leaving made no sense. I like the new ''Raven's Home'' cast too but I really wanted to see more of the original. But, I think Navia and Sky chose to leave on their own because they revealed new big roles (''Surviving Summer'', ''Gotham Knights'') almost immediately. If that's the case, I'm happy for them. Having exposure outside of Disney is usually a big plus. Like Jenna Ortega is now one of the most in-demand young actresses at the moment. If ''Stuck in the Middle'' got S4, she wouldn't have been cast in ''You'' which gave her so much attention and dozens of big roles. — ] 01:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

=== In other news... ===
...I am becoming more convinced that ] is another sock of ]. I don't have solid enough evidence yet to take it to ], but there's enough article and editing-type overlap to make me suspicious, and I may take a more thorough look over the weekend... This doesn't affect you. I'm just putting it out there. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 19:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

=== '']'' ===
Hey, now that I'm seeing ads for it, shouldn't ''The Really Loud House'' get a standalone article now?! {{U|Magitroopa}}? {{U|Starforce13}}?... P.S. I suggest working the live-action ] TV movie more into that article than the original '']'' artcle. FWIW. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 14:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

:No clue when/if I may get to it, but incase anyone does get to it before me, the backdoor pilot Christmas special draft is at ], and the current information on it in the main article is at ]. ] (]) 14:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
:: Yes, it deserves its own article and the Christmas special definitely belongs there since it's a backdoor pilot. I haven't been keeping up to date with ''The Loud House'' franchise, but live action is something I met get into. — ] 02:28, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

{{od|2}} Has anyone watched this yet? Did they explain the absence of the oldest sister? {{U|Magitroopa}}? {{U|Starforce13}}? Thanks. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 15:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

: I haven't *fully* watched it, but I believe she is still in it. However, I believe she is credited as a guest star in the first episode. ] (]) 15:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
::{{Re|Magitroopa}} I would highly advise adding a 'Guest' cast section to the article then, listing at least her. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 16:32, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
::: {{re|IJBall}}, the in-universe explanation was that Lori is in college and she's only home for a few days. So, it seems she'll be recurring at best. — ] 22:06, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
::::Thanks {{U|Starforce13}}. Do you know what the explanation for the other sister that was only credited as a guest star? (after a recast...) Is that just the baby sister? --] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
::::: {{u|IJBall}}, yes, the other one is the baby sister (Lily) who barely talks. — ] 22:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

=== ] ===
You probably don't have any time to look at this either, huh?... My guess is that he qualifies for an article by now. The problem is I don't have the time to try and dig up the sourcing to show that. Oh well... --] <small>(] • ])</small> 18:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

:I've done basic cleanup here now. Dunno if I'm going to do much else. At the least, '']'' needs to be added to the article, and better (much better!!) sources need to be found. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

=== Unconstructive? ===
How is that unconstructive? Linking to ] from ], her character on '']''? ] (]) 22:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

:You readded the edit after being reverted the first time – that's textbook ] and violates ]. On my end, you removed a citation needed tag without explanation, and included unnecessary piping. I'll add back the link, both nothing else you did is necessary. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 23:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

=== Isabela Merced ===

I fail to see what valid information is being removed. It's not vital information for her notes section to know what movie is on a streaming platform, vast majority of other actor filmographies don't. Explain why this is important information to retain and I'll leave it. ] 18:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

== November 2022 ==
=== Barnstar from me to you :) ===

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You revert so many edits EVERY SINGLE day. You revert vandalism and contribute so much. I sometimes get annoyed by some vandals but you revert their bad edits. <span style="color:silver">] (]) 18:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)</span>
|}<!--template:The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar-->
===Happy Birthday!===
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
<div style="display: flex; align-items: center; min-height: 100px; padding: 1em; border: solid 3px #2B547E; background-color: #E6E6FA;">] '''Wishing ] a very happy birthday on behalf of the ]!''' &nbsp; <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 18:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)</div>
===Happy Birthday!===
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
{{ombox
| name = Happy Birthday
| image = ]
| imageright = ]
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue);
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
| text = <big>'''Happy birthday!'''</big><br />Hi Amaury! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! ]<sup>]</sup> 21:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
}}

===Happy Thanksgiving===
{| style="margin:1em auto; border-radius:1em; box-shadow:0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); font-family:Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; border:3px solid Brown; padding:6px; background:Tan;"
|]
|YoungForever has given you a ]! Turkeys promote ] and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! — ]] 17:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
{{small|Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{tls|Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.}}
|}<!-- Template:Thanksgiving Turkey -->

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 -->

== Number of Categories ==

Where does it say that categories require at least a dozen links? It sounds like you are quoting something. ] (]) 17:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

== Ultra Violet & Black Scorpion ==

I don't think I noticed that statement of cancellation was mentioned in production section. ] (]) 06:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

== Danger Force Characters ==

{{archive top|result=This discussion is pointless here, as it is just a bunch of complaining. Use the article talk page; however, the episode list is perfectly up-to-date. For the record, I disagree with this move, as they are still two separate series, but I'm not going to bother fighting it and will respect the consensus on the article's talk page. ] • 20:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)|status=closed}}

I know you have deleted several of the characters that I just added before. Can I ask the reason behind this? I went through and added the characters that have appeared at least 3 times and/or had a major impact on the shows. The only one I may agree with you is Mike Carn's character, but we have Nathan Kress's character listed who appeared for like 2-3 seconds. ] (]) 18:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

: Chest Monster has appeared in,

Lil' Dynomite
Monsty
An Imposter Among Us
A Danger Among Us
Krampapalooza
Attack of the Clones
Let's Go to the Movies!
Wedding of the Trentury

and Angela has appeared in,

The Danger Force Awakens
Vidja Games
Twin It to Win It
Family Lies
An Imposter Among Us
Unmasked


=== ] at ] ===
::: {{U|Amaury}}!!! Clearly, the episode list hasn't been updated. I know IMDB can't be used but clearly you can check and they have been clearly added in all those episodes. In addition where does it say 5 episodes as other users have mentioned 3 episodes. ] (]) 20:16, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


Could you ] ] (]) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
: {{Re|Deepfriedokra}} Thank you for the message. I will start off by saying that I don't claim to be perfect, and mistakes certainly happen.
:* Diffs 1 and 6 were already answered by other users.
:* Diff 2 was a mistake that I did not catch.
:* Diff 3 was in violation of ] a common word. This disruption has been a long-term problem in slow-motion from various IPs since at least September 2020, unless I missed something in the article history. I will going to ] the next time it happens. It wasn't happening frequently enough that I didn't know if a request at WP:RFPP would have been approved, but it's getting old and will be going there next time.
:* Diff 4 introduced cast and characters that were not recurring, with the exception of Iggy and Young Alisha. Non-main cast and characters with a credit of guest star or higher need a minimum of five appearances to be considered recurring.
:* Diffs 5, 9, and 10 introduced category/template bloat.
:* Diff 7 broke code formatting, which is often ] that people do.
:* Diff 8 introduced unsourced content.
:* Diff 11 was a partial mistake, as the edit did introduce problems, so it was roughly 50% bad. This is also another area of sneaky vandalism, as people often make up or guess what characters' full names are, which is in-universe ], unless there's a reliable primary or secondary source, such as the credits (primary).
:* Diff 12 introduced a sentence fragment, as well as intentionally breaking the formatting with that line break, despite the user claiming they were correcting grammar.
:* Diff 13 violates ].
:* Diff 14 introduced unnecessary sourcing. The series' credits serve as the primary source. Once an episode airs, a source is no longer required since the episode itself serves as the source. For example, if a secondary source says John Smith as The Great Apple will appear, once that episode airs, the secondary source is no longer required, since the actor and who they portray will be listed in the primary source—the credits.


: Having said all that, I don't appreciate a random user who I don't know stalking my edits and trying to cause trouble by blowing a potentially small problem out of proportion, especially a user who not only has ''far'' less edits than I do, but has also been around for ''far'' less time than I have. 14 edits out of my almost 90,000 edits overall or out of my almost 1,500 edits for 2024 that are potentially a problem don't show a pattern; otherwise, this would have been raised long ago. Unless I'm going around making severe personal attacks that require immediate attention, which I am not, they need to find something better to do with their time than to follow me around just to look for me to mess up. I'm only human, I'm not a robot. This isn't your fault, of course, and I do appreciate the message once again. ''']''' • 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
== Credits ==
::Hi Amaury, I don't think anyone is saying these reverts were all wrong, so no one is asking for a long justification for each of them. They are saying (and I am too) that the edits you reverted were, with 2 exceptions, good faith edits, certainly not obvious vandalism, and so they needed more than an unexplained rollback. This is not 14 edits out of 90,000 (nor 1,500), it is 12 edits out of the 57 edits you made between 12/21 and 12/30. As I said at AARV, all that is needed is a recalibration of your "obvious problem edit/bad faith edit” criterion. But that recalibration is needed, or else someone is going to remove your rollback permission. It doesn't need to be a big deal, but it does need addressing. Nobody is asking you to be perfect; all we're asking is that you take feedback onboard. Indeed, it looks to me like starting on the 31st, you did stop unexplained rollbacks. A simple "ok, my bad, some of those times I shouldn't have used rollback, and I've started explaining the reverts" would have nipped this in the bud. ] (]) 15:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Re|Floquenbeam}} Thank you for the message. I could and should have clarified more, but the whole "my bad" is basically what I was at least trying to get across with my not being perfect and make mistakes comment. While I can admit that what was construed as ] by another user wasn't the best of arguments, I still personally feel that the rest of the point I was trying to make is valid. AP was trying to make a mountain out of a molehill and it's pretty clear that they were following me around just looking for me to mess up just so they could have their five minutes of fame and make a report, at least in my opinion. Why so quick to go to a noticeboard to look for possible sanctions after only one message on my talk page? Then to start out with the whole "I don't like that it had to come to this, but..." just sends the wrong vibes. I don't mean for this to sound like I'm whining, because I'm not trying to, that's just what it felt like to me.


::: I do see the point you're making about looking at the edits between December 21 and December 31, but I feel it's also important to look at my edits as a whole. That's the point I was trying to make, in which more often than not, I do use edit summaries for reverts like the highlighted ones in this report. If only looking at the edits between those two dates, it makes it look bad for me, as if I'm always that way. One final point is that I wasn't ignoring AP, I just don't edit Misplaced Pages as much as I used to, as seen by my edit statistics on my user page and the long time it took to update them and my talk page archives. (The really high edit counts are when I was regularly fighting vandalism.) It's a combination of being busy in real life and just not currently having heavy interest here, so I'll normally only get on for a bit and revert any problematic edits I see. If I see I have a message, I skim it and end up forgetting about it. I can be more careful moving forward, but I also don't want to feel like I have to walk on eggshells in fear of, so to speak, AP reporting me again. ''']''' • 20:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't mean it like I was yelling at you, but since it was you I had the issue with, I thought this would be a better place. Plus I was a bit frustrated as it would be helpful if you gave the policy where it states that it is 5 episodes as I have always heard 3 episodes. Anyway, do you know how I can check the credits for Dayna Dooley as Officer Walnut as she did appear on Henry Danger for another 3 episodes? I looked on the episode page and she doesn't seem to be listed. ] (]) 20:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:09, 10 January 2025

Welcome to my talk page! Today is Saturday, January 11, 2025
The current time is 8:02 AM (PST)
Attention! Due to persistent disruption by an immature block-evading IP, this page has been indefinitely semi-protected. Newly registered users and IPs are not able to post on this talk page. Amaury07:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Archive Statistics

  • The numbers in the cells indicate how many total discussions there are for each year, each month, and overall.
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
January 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 13 7 17 5 3 6 0 2 84
February 13 35 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 12 10 5 2 1 1 105
March 11 24 0 0 1 0 42 6 13 10 8 7 4 1 4 0 131
April 20 25 0 1 0 0 38 6 11 14 10 14 5 2 1 1 148
May 23 13 0 10 12 0 15 4 18 15 7 5 1 5 0 1 129
June 14 4 0 1 39 0 10 6 15 14 9 3 9 4 4 2 134
July 20 3 0 1 14 0 18 12 13 20 16 4 2 5 2 1 131
August 8 34 0 0 3 0 7 12 19 13 14 4 0 2 1 0 117
September 8 5 0 0 0 0 9 9 6 13 5 4 7 5 3 1 75
October 24 5 0 0 0 0 6 21 16 10 5 1 6 8 2 0 104
November 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 13 9 5 3 4 5 5 75
December 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 5 13 18 15 8 10 6 6 3 6 103
Total 0 173 163 0 13 69 0 154 115 158 152 120 72 51 50 26 20 1,336

January 2025

User:Amaury using rollback to revert constructive or good-faith edits without explanation at WP:AARV

Could you address the concerns raised here? Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra: Thank you for the message. I will start off by saying that I don't claim to be perfect, and mistakes certainly happen.
  • Diffs 1 and 6 were already answered by other users.
  • Diff 2 was a mistake that I did not catch.
  • Diff 3 was in violation of WP:OVERLINKING a common word. This disruption has been a long-term problem in slow-motion from various IPs since at least September 2020, unless I missed something in the article history. I will going to WP:RFPP the next time it happens. It wasn't happening frequently enough that I didn't know if a request at WP:RFPP would have been approved, but it's getting old and will be going there next time.
  • Diff 4 introduced cast and characters that were not recurring, with the exception of Iggy and Young Alisha. Non-main cast and characters with a credit of guest star or higher need a minimum of five appearances to be considered recurring.
  • Diffs 5, 9, and 10 introduced category/template bloat.
  • Diff 7 broke code formatting, which is often sneaky vandalism that people do.
  • Diff 8 introduced unsourced content.
  • Diff 11 was a partial mistake, as the edit did introduce problems, so it was roughly 50% bad. This is also another area of sneaky vandalism, as people often make up or guess what characters' full names are, which is in-universe WP:TRIVIA, unless there's a reliable primary or secondary source, such as the credits (primary).
  • Diff 12 introduced a sentence fragment, as well as intentionally breaking the formatting with that line break, despite the user claiming they were correcting grammar.
  • Diff 13 violates WP:REDNOT.
  • Diff 14 introduced unnecessary sourcing. The series' credits serve as the primary source. Once an episode airs, a source is no longer required since the episode itself serves as the source. For example, if a secondary source says John Smith as The Great Apple will appear, once that episode airs, the secondary source is no longer required, since the actor and who they portray will be listed in the primary source—the credits.
Having said all that, I don't appreciate a random user who I don't know stalking my edits and trying to cause trouble by blowing a potentially small problem out of proportion, especially a user who not only has far less edits than I do, but has also been around for far less time than I have. 14 edits out of my almost 90,000 edits overall or out of my almost 1,500 edits for 2024 that are potentially a problem don't show a pattern; otherwise, this would have been raised long ago. Unless I'm going around making severe personal attacks that require immediate attention, which I am not, they need to find something better to do with their time than to follow me around just to look for me to mess up. I'm only human, I'm not a robot. This isn't your fault, of course, and I do appreciate the message once again. Amaury03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Amaury, I don't think anyone is saying these reverts were all wrong, so no one is asking for a long justification for each of them. They are saying (and I am too) that the edits you reverted were, with 2 exceptions, good faith edits, certainly not obvious vandalism, and so they needed more than an unexplained rollback. This is not 14 edits out of 90,000 (nor 1,500), it is 12 edits out of the 57 edits you made between 12/21 and 12/30. As I said at AARV, all that is needed is a recalibration of your "obvious problem edit/bad faith edit” criterion. But that recalibration is needed, or else someone is going to remove your rollback permission. It doesn't need to be a big deal, but it does need addressing. Nobody is asking you to be perfect; all we're asking is that you take feedback onboard. Indeed, it looks to me like starting on the 31st, you did stop unexplained rollbacks. A simple "ok, my bad, some of those times I shouldn't have used rollback, and I've started explaining the reverts" would have nipped this in the bud. Floquenbeam (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
@Floquenbeam: Thank you for the message. I could and should have clarified more, but the whole "my bad" is basically what I was at least trying to get across with my not being perfect and make mistakes comment. While I can admit that what was construed as WP:ITIS by another user wasn't the best of arguments, I still personally feel that the rest of the point I was trying to make is valid. AP was trying to make a mountain out of a molehill and it's pretty clear that they were following me around just looking for me to mess up just so they could have their five minutes of fame and make a report, at least in my opinion. Why so quick to go to a noticeboard to look for possible sanctions after only one message on my talk page? Then to start out with the whole "I don't like that it had to come to this, but..." just sends the wrong vibes. I don't mean for this to sound like I'm whining, because I'm not trying to, that's just what it felt like to me.
I do see the point you're making about looking at the edits between December 21 and December 31, but I feel it's also important to look at my edits as a whole. That's the point I was trying to make, in which more often than not, I do use edit summaries for reverts like the highlighted ones in this report. If only looking at the edits between those two dates, it makes it look bad for me, as if I'm always that way. One final point is that I wasn't ignoring AP, I just don't edit Misplaced Pages as much as I used to, as seen by my edit statistics on my user page and the long time it took to update them and my talk page archives. (The really high edit counts are when I was regularly fighting vandalism.) It's a combination of being busy in real life and just not currently having heavy interest here, so I'll normally only get on for a bit and revert any problematic edits I see. If I see I have a message, I skim it and end up forgetting about it. I can be more careful moving forward, but I also don't want to feel like I have to walk on eggshells in fear of, so to speak, AP reporting me again. Amaury20:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)