| Revision as of 01:13, 29 January 2023 editLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators766,262 edits AFD nomination← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:13, 23 December 2024 edit undoFrost (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,408 editsm →Top AfC Editor: fix tableTag: AWB | ||
| (372 intermediate revisions by 80 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| | algo = old( |
| algo = old(7d) | ||
| | archive = User talk:Twinkle1990/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:Twinkle1990/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| | counter = |
| counter = 32 | ||
| | maxarchivesize = 5K | | maxarchivesize = 5K | ||
| | archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | | archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] Restored revision 1230573385 by Twinkle1990 (talk): Please don't mess-up against ] == | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] has been accepted == | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> | |||
| Hi ], | |||
| Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br /> | |||
| => https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=What_You_Wish_For&diff=1230596183&oldid=1230590279 | |||
| The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its ]. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they ] over time. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
| I'm not sure if you've undone the right revision, mate - you've restored the article practically to the state it was in when I was submitting it last night. All the changes in "Release", "Reception", ] and ] are gone now... Was that intentional? 🤨 | |||
| <div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now ] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer.</div> | |||
| And if we are talking about ] - which sources in my changes were unreliable? Both ] and ] have been on the reliable list, haven't they? | |||
| If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to ] without posting a request to ].</span> | |||
| Cheers, | |||
| If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. | |||
| 17:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 17:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :You should read ] carefully. ] (]) 17:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks again, and happy editing! | |||
| ::Twinkle, you made quite a few changes which also appears to have removed sourced content and information in the infobox. You need to provide a more thorough explanation. If some of the sources were not reliable, you need point to which ones, etc. Simply linking to ] is not sufficient as that is mostly a how-to guide. ] (]) 17:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 20:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | |||
| :::I can only concur with ]: quite a few people have made substantial changes to the article and invested their time and efforts - undoing a bunch of changes wholesale to the revision made previously by you is not a terribly nice thing to do, mate. 🤔 | |||
| :::Your revision has been undone ] - could you still just clarify which sources have you found to be unreliable? Without referring us to ] and ], please. Just so that I know (because I make quite a lot of changes based on what I'm told to be sound and reliable policies). | |||
| :::] (]) 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You talk about ] and ]? | |||
| ::::You used sourcing as "{{tq|Cite Box Office Mojo |id=13638858}}" where I used the url, you used ] as source, where I replaced with ]. This is not how the ] works. | |||
| ::::Your version {{tq|"The film received generally favourable reviews from critics."}} was removed. Which source said that? Please do not ad ]. | |||
| ::::Is richgirlnetwork.tv more reliable than ]? ] (]) 02:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{od}} {{u|BlairThimper73}} is connected to the subject per their . Hence, their edits meet ]. ] (]) 03:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::@] wow, so you are suggesting that ] should be allowed as a source? And richgirlnetwork.tv more reliable than '']''? What explanation do you expect from me, while you are questioning me for removing some unreliable and prohibited sources?? I guess, no more thorough is needed because you don't want to see the red flags in sourcing of current article. ] (]) 02:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No, I did not suggest anything about any of the sources nor make any opinion about your changes. If IMDB was one the sources, you were correct to remove it and any other unreliable sources. My point was you needed to provide a better explanation to Szagory so they can understand why you did what you did. ] (]) 15:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Can you please see the diff that Szagory raised here? You will clearly see red flags. Furthermore, please check this . Szagory's AFC submission was at that stage with non-RS sourcing. Any reviewer would have declined such a poorly sourced draft. But I moved further and added several ] and reviews before accepting. | |||
| :::::Also, check ] page, how they are craving for ] even after several warnings by numerous editors. ] (]) 15:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Again, I am not validating if the revert was correct or not. All I was saying is that you needed to provide a better explanation which you now have. ] (]) 15:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::They were already well guided about sourcing in their talk page. ] (]) 15:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Top AfC Editor== | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for January 12== | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- ( | )-->. Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor''' | |||
| |- | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 06:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: center; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | In 2024 you were one of the , thank you! --] (]) 14:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ] == | |||
| |} | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 10:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :@] please drop me message to uplift the article for GA status. ] (]) 12:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image tagging for File:Shilksha Mandal.jpg== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. | |||
| To add this information, click on ], then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on ]. | |||
| For more information on using images, see the following pages: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| Thank you for your cooperation. --] (]) 17:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Removed GA nominations == | |||
| Hello. I'm leaving you this message to let you know that I've removed four of your Good Article nominations at ], ], ], and ]. It appears you have not substantially contributed to these articles before nominating them. While "drive-by" nominations have always been discouraged, there is now a consensus that they are subject to removal without review. The relevant discussion can be found ], and any further questions can be posted at ]. I'd also suggest taking the time to make sure an article meets the ] before nominating it, and be careful not to nominate too many at once until you've completed a few nominations (the nomination process can sometimes be difficult and time consuming). ] (]) 17:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| An article you recently created, ], is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from ], ]. <small>(])</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (] is of ] on Misplaced Pages). I've moved your draft to ] (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's ] and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ] (]) 13:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Poster of Candy web series.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Trial By Fire poster.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --]<sup>«¦]¦»</sup> 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Streaming service doesn't meet WP:GNG'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] 22:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] 06:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Dharavi Bank (Web series).jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Dadasaheb Phalke Award == | |||
| Hi, in you claimed that the web series ''Candy'' won {{tq|the Dadasaheb Phalke Award for "Best web series" in 2022}}. However, that is a misunderstanding. The very notable ] is given to one individual every year, for a lifetime's service to Indian cinema. It is not given to films, web series, Best Actor in Supporting Role, or anything like that. What the web series won was the Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival Award for best web series. Since that is not a notable award, it should not be included in the article – and to the article about the genuine Dadasaheb Phalke Award is extremely misleading. For more info on this, see ]. --'']'' <small>] ]</small> 20:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==AFD nomination== | |||
| Hello, Twinkle1990, | |||
| At least one AFD nomination you made was done incorrectly. You didn't tag the article and I don't believe that you notified the article creator about the deletion tagging. Please follow the guidelines to a "T" at ] if you want to make future nominations. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:13, 23 December 2024
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
What You Wish For Restored revision 1230573385 by Twinkle1990 (talk): Please don't mess-up against WP:RS
Hi Twinkle1990,
=> https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=What_You_Wish_For&diff=1230596183&oldid=1230590279
I'm not sure if you've undone the right revision, mate - you've restored the article practically to the state it was in when I was submitting it last night. All the changes in "Release", "Reception", WP:Plot and WP:Lead are gone now... Was that intentional? 🤨
And if we are talking about WP:RS - which sources in my changes were unreliable? Both Box Office Mojo and The Numbers (website) have been on the reliable list, haven't they?
Cheers, 17:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC) Szagory (talk) 17:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- You should read WP:CITE carefully. Twinkle1990 (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Twinkle, you made quite a few changes which also appears to have removed sourced content and information in the infobox. You need to provide a more thorough explanation. If some of the sources were not reliable, you need point to which ones, etc. Simply linking to WP:CITE is not sufficient as that is mostly a how-to guide. S0091 (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can only concur with S0091: quite a few people have made substantial changes to the article and invested their time and efforts - undoing a bunch of changes wholesale to the revision made previously by you is not a terribly nice thing to do, mate. 🤔
- Your revision has been undone user:BlairThimper73 - could you still just clarify which sources have you found to be unreliable? Without referring us to WP:RS and WP:CITE, please. Just so that I know (because I make quite a lot of changes based on what I'm told to be sound and reliable policies).
- Szagory (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- You talk about WP:RS and WP:CITE?
- You used sourcing as "
Cite Box Office Mojo
" where I used the url, you used IMDb as source, where I replaced with IGN. This is not how the WP:RS works. - Your version
"The film received generally favourable reviews from critics."
was removed. Which source said that? Please do not ad original research. - Is richgirlnetwork.tv more reliable than Movie Insider? Twinkle1990 (talk) 02:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- BlairThimper73 is connected to the subject per their own say. Hence, their edits meet conflicting. Twinkle1990 (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @S0091 wow, so you are suggesting that IMDb should be allowed as a source? And richgirlnetwork.tv more reliable than Movie Insider? What explanation do you expect from me, while you are questioning me for removing some unreliable and prohibited sources?? I guess, no more thorough is needed because you don't want to see the red flags in sourcing of current article. Twinkle1990 (talk) 02:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, I did not suggest anything about any of the sources nor make any opinion about your changes. If IMDB was one the sources, you were correct to remove it and any other unreliable sources. My point was you needed to provide a better explanation to Szagory so they can understand why you did what you did. S0091 (talk) 15:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please see the diff that Szagory raised here? You will clearly see red flags. Furthermore, please check this diff. Szagory's AFC submission was at that stage with non-RS sourcing. Any reviewer would have declined such a poorly sourced draft. But I moved further and added several reliable sourcing and reviews before accepting.
- Also, check User talk:Szagory page, how they are craving for IBDb even after several warnings by numerous editors. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again, I am not validating if the revert was correct or not. All I was saying is that you needed to provide a better explanation which you now have. S0091 (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- They were already well guided about sourcing in their talk page. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again, I am not validating if the revert was correct or not. All I was saying is that you needed to provide a better explanation which you now have. S0091 (talk) 15:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, I did not suggest anything about any of the sources nor make any opinion about your changes. If IMDB was one the sources, you were correct to remove it and any other unreliable sources. My point was you needed to provide a better explanation to Szagory so they can understand why you did what you did. S0091 (talk) 15:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Twinkle, you made quite a few changes which also appears to have removed sourced content and information in the infobox. You need to provide a more thorough explanation. If some of the sources were not reliable, you need point to which ones, etc. Simply linking to WP:CITE is not sufficient as that is mostly a how-to guide. S0091 (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Top AfC Editor
|
The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor | |
| In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |