Misplaced Pages

Talk:Book of Lismore: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:14, 8 March 2007 editManopingo (talk | contribs)200 edits is an original piece of writing  Latest revision as of 04:03, 29 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,659,611 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Ireland}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
⚫ This new ''temp stub article'' is an original piece of writing, by myself. Of course, the historical data will remain the same and that cannot be changed.
{{WikiProject Ireland|importance= mid}}
}}
==Untitled==
⚫ This new ] is an original piece of writing, by myself. Of course, the historical data will remain the same and that cannot be changed. ] 18:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

:Have added links etc. No-one should have any CR problems with the article now.-] 02:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

=="Confiscated" or "stolen"?==
First time using this medium so please excuse of there are errors.
Finbarr,
In the article on the Book of Lismore you speak of the book being 'confiscated'.
Surely this is incorrect - the book was stolen, robbed.
Denis <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Above comment originally placed on my Talk page but needs to be here. Personally, I have no idea which word is the more appropriate. Hope others can advise... --] (]) 09:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
::'Confiscated' indicates that it was taken on the basis of a legal authority, we should not be swayed by whether we think it was a reasonable action. Changing this to 'stolen' without adding a source or referring to the existing sources could be interpreted as a ]. If there is real doubt about the circumstances then we could use the more neutral 'taken'. ] (]) 16:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:03, 29 January 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconIreland Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This new temp stub article is an original piece of writing, by myself. Of course, the historical data will remain the same and that cannot be changed. Manopingo 18:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Have added links etc. No-one should have any CR problems with the article now.-Manopingo 02:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

"Confiscated" or "stolen"?

First time using this medium so please excuse of there are errors. Finbarr, In the article on the Book of Lismore you speak of the book being 'confiscated'. Surely this is incorrect - the book was stolen, robbed. Denis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denis.kiely (talk • contribs) 09:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Above comment originally placed on my Talk page but needs to be here. Personally, I have no idea which word is the more appropriate. Hope others can advise... --A bit iffy (talk) 09:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
'Confiscated' indicates that it was taken on the basis of a legal authority, we should not be swayed by whether we think it was a reasonable action. Changing this to 'stolen' without adding a source or referring to the existing sources could be interpreted as a point-of-view edit. If there is real doubt about the circumstances then we could use the more neutral 'taken'. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Categories: