| Revision as of 07:56, 27 April 2023 editArmando AZ (talk | contribs)426 edits →Comments by other users: ClarifityTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:28, 12 July 2023 edit undoMarioGom (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers35,188 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Armando AZ/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tags: Replaced Manual revert | ||
| (42 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|Armando AZ}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Armando AZ}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| ===24 April 2023=== | |||
| {{SPI case status|CUrequest}} | |||
| ====Suspected sockpuppets==== | |||
| {{sock list|1=Alfredo18elguapo|2=Pessi69|3=186.32.48.176|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> | |||
| Following the ], edits on Peruvian topics have become contentious. Recent edits on these topics have ]. On the article ], of ] and ]; Armando AZ was attempting to use ''written'' unrelated sources placed into the ] article ''10 years ago'' to synthesize an original argument. Armando AZ responded with more ] using more unrelated sources, which . Upon looking at each individual source, I removed each of them while providing a rationale.</nowiki>]</nowiki>]</nowiki>]</nowiki>]</nowiki>] | |||
| From nowhere, ] reverted my edits without providing rationale and and saying that "most users agree with" Armando AZ, though no other users were involved in the article, making this curious to me. Reviewing past edits to see if there were other users supporting Armando AZ, I found the ] 186.32.48.176, who has similar edits with both Armando AZ and Alfredo18elguapo; all have the common edits with ] (, , ) and more curiously on the articles ] (, , ) and the ] ( while and editing at the same time). This would stop here, but then I saw a new user editing on Peruvian topics and notice this exchange of and then being by an established user. Overall, this activity warrants a look, especially after looking at it through the "Editor interaction utility". ] (]) 20:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :It was my mistake to have interfered. In my defense I will say that I am a , I have not gotten into any trouble there. I usually edit articles referring to political or social issues, so it's obvious that I'm going to come across several times with users who do the same (like you in this case). The editions in state atheism are '''one from March 2021 and another from 2023''' and they have nothing to do with each other; a case of ]. Finally, he clarifies that my IP is indeed the one of ], that is why we not only appear editing together on this page but also in Spanish. For example: https://es.m.wikipedia.org/Especial:History/Fosa_com%C3%BAn or https://es.m.wikipedia.org/Especial:History/Partido_de_la_Reconstrucci%C3%B3n_del_Orden_Nacional . Regarding the last case, say that it is likely that it is a puppet or multi-account, since in fact he has an , in which he has not yet edited anything. But the fact is that it is not mine ] (]) 22:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| {{A note}} It appears that for pushing narratives.-] (]) 21:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| {{A note}} Alfredo18elguapo also , raising concerns of ].--] (]) 22:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :look at the time ] (]) 22:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :: ] (]) 22:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | |||
| :<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| Reply: Nice try, but the accusation doesn't hold up. Other users have made edits with me, for example with the user ], who is older than me. And just like me, he has been peppered with the whole issue of controversial WMrapids editions and articles, such as ] and ]; even despite receiving warnings for their biases in said editions ( and ). On the other hand, having to cite a two-year-old edit as proof that "you edit articles similar to a other user" is just ridiculous. Finally, say that my blocking was due to the on the Spanish Misplaced Pages, who did not stop blocking me despite my attempts to dialogue with him. I made a claim a few weeks ago explaining this and it has been pending review ever since. I clarify that I am not taking this in any way personally, I have gone through processes like this before and now I know how to respond appropriately, so I hope my answer is not misinterpreted and I apologize in advance if anyone feels offended by this.] (]) 00:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:28, 12 July 2023
Armando AZ
Armando AZ (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Armando AZ/Archive.