| Revision as of 15:32, 18 March 2007 editDev920 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers11,505 edits →Awards/Dev920/ANI: well, stop editing then if I annoy you so much.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:31, 2 October 2023 edit undoQwerfjkl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers212,906 edits Notifying user about Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members (via script) | ||
| (58 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{busy|]}} | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |{{{message|''']''' is busy in ] and may not respond swiftly to queries.}}} | |||
| |} | |||
| ''] | ''] | ||
| ==Gone for a while== | ==Gone for a while== | ||
| Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. ] 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. ] 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| === Philadelphia Meetup 3 === | |||
| FYI ... ] | |||
| --] <sup>(])</sup> 00:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Help requested== | |||
| How do I protect my page from during extended periods of absence? --] 13:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] case== | |||
| <nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki> | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. ] 03:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Bring it on bitch. ] 03:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I had nothing to do with User:Student Erotica, and no sockpuppetry was actually proven.|decline=The meatpuppetry was obvious. Denied. — ] ] 03:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I had nothing to do with Student Erotica, and no sockpuppetry was actually proven.|decline=Your attempt at convincing me is as successful as your attempt at convincing Irishguy. — ] 01:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| : Hello South Philly. Please see: ]. —]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 14:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * User also posted a more extensive at WP:AN using a doppleganger account established and marked as such in 2006. I've blocked the doppleganger, which should be unblocked if the block here is ever lifted. ] 01:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Barnstar! == | |||
| **Frankly, he admitted the meatpuppetry in : ''What you call meatpupptery, I call loyalty''. Call it whatever you want...but it is still the same thing. He was knowingly gaming the system to edit war. ] ] 21:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thanks a lot for the unexpected barnstar! This really brightened my day, I appreciate it. :) I hope you have a day as great as mine. - ] <sup>]</sup> 14:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unblock== | |||
| I am appreciative as well. Thank you for the barnstar! --<font color="Gray">]</font> <font color="LightSeaGreen">]</font><sub>]</sub> 21:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=blocking not warranted|decline=Per the above declines. — ] (]) 18:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Nomination== | |||
| Thanks ... I think ... --] <sup>(])</sup> 14:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Over on the ] page there was an edit war. An anon user started editing in some text under | |||
| == Barnstar Thanks == | |||
| :{{user5|1=151.201.155.166}} | |||
| :{{user5|1=151.197.111.178}} | |||
| When told to register, they did so as: | |||
| :{{user5|Student erotica}} | |||
| In the end, Student Erotica got blocked as being my sock. Not so. There was nothing proven, just allegations. I got blocked. I gave up editing Misplaced Pages a while a go because I wasn't enjoying it. I don't necessarily plan to continue ever again, but this block annoys me, and it is being used against another user, who I happen to have worked with a lot. | |||
| I am sorry for being a contentious editor, please unblock me. Cordially, ] (]) 18:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your kind gesture, I greatly appreciate it :).] <font color="purple">]</font> 16:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| ==Just because== | |||
| |- | |||
| For your hard work with barnstars ] 14:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |] | |||
| :Thanks! --<small>] ]</small> 16:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |{{{message|''']''' is busy in ] and may not respond swiftly to queries.}}} | |||
| |} | |||
| ''] | |||
| == Evrik == | |||
| ==Gone for a while== | |||
| Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. ] 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Would you care to take a look at ] and leave a comment if you feel it is appropriate? Thank you. -- <font color="#DE3163">]</font> • <small><font color="#660066">]</font> | <font color="#FF4F00">]</font> | <font color="#2E8B57">]</font></small> 23:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unblock== | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=blocking not warranted. Over on the ] page there was an edit war. An anon user started editing in some text under :<span>] <span class="plainlinks " >(] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' )</span></span> :<span>] <span class="plainlinks " >(] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' )</span></span> When told to register, they did so as: :<span>] <span class="plainlinks " >(] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ] '''·''' )</span></span> In the end, Student Erotica got blocked as being my sock. Not so. There was nothing proven, just allegations. I got blocked. I gave up editing Misplaced Pages a while a go because I wasn't enjoying it. I don't necessarily plan to continue ever again, but this block annoys me, and it is being used against another user, who I happen to have worked with a lot. I am sorry for being a contentious editor, please unblock me. Cordially, ] (]) 00:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | decline=While I am glad you finally submitted something more than "Am not!" as a counterargument, it seems that the consensus has been clear to the contrary. You've had enough of this; I'm revoking talk page access. — ] (]) 02:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| *I'm not familiar with the dispute in ], but I've removed your wikilink to ], which redirects to ]. If you weren't aware of the redirect, you may want to clarify that, since attempting to pin a psychological diagnosis on someone is a particularly ugly form of ]. <font face="Trebuchet MS, Trebuchet"><i><b>]]</b></i></font> 00:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| There are three proposals which need some comments. Please weigh in: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| Two of the three are sensitive, and ] is taking the whole . Finally, there has never been a standard for how much support is needed for the creation of a barnstar. The LGBT star went up with seven votes, and thuglas is threatening to post '''his''' star when he gets ten supportive votes. Thoughts? --] <sup>(])</sup> | |||
| Barnstar]] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| Two of the three are sensitive, and ] is taking the whole . Finally, there has never been a standard for how much support is needed for the creation of a barnstar. The LGBT star went up with seven votes, and thuglas is threatening to post '''his''' star when he gets ten supportive votes. Thoughts? --] <sup>(])</sup> | |||
| *Once again, someone disagrees with my interpretation of our very loose guidelines. Now I don't mind when two users like and , but they've taken the disagreement and posted negative comments over at that . | |||
| :So ... could you please weigh in one last time ... new barnstar or a wikiproject award ]. Thanks. --] <sup>(])</sup> 22:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I'll look. --] 02:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Philadelphia 3== | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Philadelphia 3/invite}} | |||
| ==Confused== | |||
| I'm confused- for what post are you apologising? I don't remember ever interacting with you on Misplaced Pages before you posted to my talkpage a moment ago... <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 15:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : No I hadn't. This isn't an area of the encyclopedia I involve myself in much. I only noticed the discussions there because of the proposal to change the text of the "Editor's Barnstar", which concerned me because it would have changed it considerably from the purpose that Guanaco had created it for (and he is of course no longer around to comment). I was then asked to comment on the Copyeditor proposal by Kathryn NicDhàna. Which struck me as a good idea for recognising some of the more Wikignomish activities that often go unrecognised on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| : Having now read your post I must say that I would have responded strongly had I not first received you apology. But to clarify, my comment on Evrik's RfC had no connection to my discussion with Kathryn. Evrik's behaviour as highlighted in that RfC concerns me, you will note that a member of ArbCom has also endorsed the complaint. I would like to point out that I endorsed Evrik's RfC the day before Kathryn posted on my talkpage and therefore before I knew of the Copyeditor award proposal. | |||
| : Finally if you feel anything I said in response to Kathryn's question on my talkpage was incorrect please let me know. My comment about Evrik there may well have been influenced by my having read the RfC the previous night. Whether in good faith or not, his actions as regards this proposal do strike me as heavy handed. Yours, <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 15:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for your response. I wish to try and avoid getting bogged down in this dispute and in any event will be largely away from Misplaced Pages for the next few days. Given the proposals I see you have made in relation to the Awards process I would like to suggest the following: | |||
| ::# If any person is given particular responsibilities on Misplaced Pages and this is usually for ensuring that an element of process runs smoothly, it is essential that such persons are chosen through concensus. If it is not at present the policy of the Awards Wikiproject to elect coordinators etc. it should be. | |||
| ::# Where someone exercises authority over other Wikipedians by virtue of being responsible for administering some element of process (something that in my opinion should be avoid as much as possible), it is essential that they do so openly and kindly. In this context I would recommend that where a proposal is archieved without being adopted, the reasons for this should be explained fully by the archiver at the top of the discussion and a kind note be left on the talkpage of the proposer, including an explanation of how this decision may be challenged. | |||
| ::I think you are quite right to seek codification of the criteria by which barnstars and other awards are chosen and that should ensure peoplen understand the process and see that they are being dealt with fairly. I hope you will invite comment from the Village Pump on the specifics of such a criteria so that any decision reflects the concensus of the Misplaced Pages community generally. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 16:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Comments== | |||
| ] {{unsigned|Thuglas|10:57, 1 March 2007}} | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks for the head's up. --] <sup>(])</sup> 21:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Woops. == | |||
| You mean did I intend to make it easier to add one's name and to remove evrik from his self-appointed position as coordinator? Sorry, yes I did, I will move it back. ] (Have a nice day!) 23:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *You are not good for wikipedia. --] 18:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Yea== | |||
| haha i guess wikipedia is just frustraing me more than its worth. - taking too much time aswell cya - ]<sup>]|]</sup> 14:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Good luck. --] 18:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikiprojects have no special authority == | |||
| :: The above is complete and utter bollocks - EVERY Wikipedian has the right to have a say - do not be confused about this, wikiprojects are co-ordination tools, they do NOT get to opt out of basic policies, they do not get to opt out of core values of the project and you have NO authority to decide who gets a say - especially in light of the fact that at least 5 editors have stated that we are not have an exclusive vote - you have no right to implement what you like over the top of the community. --] 16:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please don't curse on my page. It is not civil. --] 18:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey there, about WikiProject Awards... == | |||
| Hey South Philly. | |||
| I just want to say I get just as frustrated as you appear to about the current situation here. I want this project to work, because I think that, working properly, it could be an asset to the community. I know your pretty POed about thulgas leaving, thats a quite a large blow to this project and wikipedia as a whole, but please don't post stuff like | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| Dev920 drove away thuglas from wikipedia. --South Philly 18:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| Seriously man, I know you don't like dev920, and with obvious reasons on your part, but this ''really'' isn't cool at all. I neither like nor dislike Dev920's treatment of this situation, so don't take my actions the wrong way, I just want the project to work. I really am not trying to get at you here, but ''please'' don't post stuff like that, it doesn't help us at all and just widens the gap between what seems to be two different groups forming. ] 22:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I get totally what you're saying, and I understand your anger and frustration. But you're right, of course, there are big changes that need to happen for this project to get back to normal order. Kudos, ] 19:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: yes it was just horrible dev920, not a like a whole stream of other editors told you the co-ordinator was a bad idea and you trying to rig the vote didn't help or throwing your toys out of the pram when the community told you that was a no-no. No it's just dev920 all on her own... --] 19:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *This whole thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. --] 14:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Awards/Dev920/ANI === | |||
| :This looks to me like a very clear case of sockpuppetry - ] is exhibiting a number of behavioral similarities to you, and is supporting your viewpoint apparently without question. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 01:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I'll make no comment about the situation that does or did pertain at the Project, I haven't looked closely enough at it to say. But if the situation there has to any reasonable extent "stabilised", then I don't see what purpose there is in further posting to ANI. That's what I was trying to Subtly Hint(TM) at. I'd think that waiting until the dust settles would be exactly the right thing to do at the moment. ] 15:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| *Situations like this and editors like Dev920 are what make me less likely to edit on Misplaced Pages. --] 14:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ]] 12:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :Stop editing then, instead of leaving messages threatening to do so. ] (Have a nice day!) 15:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== CfD nomination at {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}} == | ||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''{{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}}''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notify--> Thank you. ]] 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed ]. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, ]. ] 17:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 2 October 2023
|
South Philly is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
User talk:South Philly/Archive
Gone for a while
Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. South Philly 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/South Philly for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Gscshoyru 03:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bring it on bitch. South Philly 03:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I had nothing to do with User:Student Erotica, and no sockpuppetry was actually proven.
Decline reason:
The meatpuppetry was obvious. Denied. — IrishGuy 03:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I had nothing to do with Student Erotica, and no sockpuppetry was actually proven.
Decline reason:
Your attempt at convincing me is as successful as your attempt at convincing Irishguy. — Yamla 01:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- User also posted a more extensive unblock request at WP:AN using a doppleganger account established and marked as such in 2006. I've blocked the doppleganger, which should be unblocked if the block here is ever lifted. GRBerry 01:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Frankly, he admitted the meatpuppetry in this edit: What you call meatpupptery, I call loyalty. Call it whatever you want...but it is still the same thing. He was knowingly gaming the system to edit war. IrishGuy 21:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Unblock
South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
blocking not warranted
Decline reason:
Per the above declines. — Sandstein (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Over on the erotica page there was an edit war. An anon user started editing in some text under
- 151.201.155.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 151.197.111.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
When told to register, they did so as:
- Student erotica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
In the end, Student Erotica got blocked as being my sock. Not so. There was nothing proven, just allegations. I got blocked. I gave up editing Misplaced Pages a while a go because I wasn't enjoying it. I don't necessarily plan to continue ever again, but this block annoys me, and it is being used against another user, who I happen to have worked with a lot.
I am sorry for being a contentious editor, please unblock me. Cordially, South Philly (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
|
|
South Philly is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
User talk:South Philly/Archive
Gone for a while
Busy in real life. Email me if you want me to answer. South Philly 19:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Unblock
South Philly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
blocking not warranted. Over on the erotica page there was an edit war. An anon user started editing in some text under :151.201.155.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) :151.197.111.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) When told to register, they did so as: :Student erotica (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) In the end, Student Erotica got blocked as being my sock. Not so. There was nothing proven, just allegations. I got blocked. I gave up editing Misplaced Pages a while a go because I wasn't enjoying it. I don't necessarily plan to continue ever again, but this block annoys me, and it is being used against another user, who I happen to have worked with a lot. I am sorry for being a contentious editor, please unblock me. Cordially, South Philly (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
While I am glad you finally submitted something more than "Am not!" as a counterargument, it seems that the consensus has been clear to the contrary. You've had enough of this; I'm revoking talk page access. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- This looks to me like a very clear case of sockpuppetry - User:Student erotica is exhibiting a number of behavioral similarities to you, and is supporting your viewpoint apparently without question. Hersfold 01:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Current-PhiladelphiaCOTM
Template:Current-PhiladelphiaCOTM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. TartarTorte 12:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)