Misplaced Pages

Jolyon Maugham: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:04, 23 June 2023 editAtchom (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users45,088 edits Undid revision 1161494645 by Sideswipe9th (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:16, 10 November 2024 edit undoPretzelles (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,368 edits added image 
(62 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
| name = Jolyon Maugham | name = Jolyon Maugham
| honorific_suffix = {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|KC}} | honorific_suffix = {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|KC}}
| image = | image = Jolyon Maugham, September 2017 (cropped).jpg
| alt = | alt =
| caption = | caption = Maugham in 2017
| birth_name = Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham | birth_name = Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1971|07|01|df=y}} | birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1971|07|01|df=y}}
Line 23: Line 23:
| father = ] | father = ]
}} }}
'''Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|KC}} ({{IPAc-en|m|ɔː|m}}; born 1 July 1971)<ref name='who'>{{cite book |chapter=Maugham, Jolyon Toby Dennis |title=Who's Who|location=Oxford|publisher=A & C Black|year=2015|isbn=978-0-19-954088-4|doi=10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U283232|title-link=Who's Who (UK)}}</ref> is a British barrister.<ref name='Dev'/> A taxation law specialist, he is the founder and director of the ], through which he has played a role in bringing to court a number of legal challenges to the ] process, which he opposed. He has written on Brexit and legal issues for publications such as '']'',<ref>{{cite news |last=Maugham |first=Jolyon |date=19 November 2016 |title=How Nicola Sturgeon could shake up 'cosy consensus' and use Article 50 to wrest back control of Scotland's future |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/11/19/how-nicola-sturgeon-could-shake-up-cosy-consensus-and-use-articl/ |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> '']''<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jolyon-maugham |title=Jolyon Maugham |work=The Guardian |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> and the '']''.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/writers/320811 |title=Jolyon Maugham |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> '''Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|KC}} ({{IPAc-en|m|ɔː|m}}; born 1 July 1971<ref name='who'>{{cite book |chapter=Maugham, Jolyon Toby Dennis |title=Who's Who|location=Oxford|publisher=A & C Black|year=2015|isbn=978-0-19-954088-4|doi=10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U283232|title-link=Who's Who (UK)}}</ref>) is a British barrister.<ref name='Dev'/> Initially a practitioner in contentious taxation law, he stepped away in order to act as the founder and director of the ], through which he has played a role in bringing to court a number of legal challenges to the ] process. He has written on Brexit and legal issues for publications such as '']'',<ref>{{cite news |last=Maugham |first=Jolyon |date=19 November 2016 |title=How Nicola Sturgeon could shake up 'cosy consensus' and use Article 50 to wrest back control of Scotland's future |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/11/19/how-nicola-sturgeon-could-shake-up-cosy-consensus-and-use-articl/ |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> '']''<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jolyon-maugham |title=Jolyon Maugham |work=The Guardian |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> and the '']''.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/writers/320811 |title=Jolyon Maugham |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> He published his first book in 2023.


==Early life==
Maugham has been at the centre of a number of controversies: a 2022 profile in ''The Times'' described him as "the ] of the Bar", who "rose from relative obscurity to found the Good Law Project".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Baksi |first=Catherine |date=24 February 2022 |title=Judges slap down busybody litigants |work=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/judges-slap-down-busybody-litigants-3xjqnqmds}}</ref>

==Biography==
Maugham is the son of the novelist ], although they did not meet until Maugham was 17. He was brought up in New Zealand by his English mother, Lynne Joyce Maugham, and his adoptive father, Alan Barker.<ref name='who'/><ref>{{cite news |last=Eleftheriou-Smith |first=Loulla-Mae |date=29 August 2017 |title=Katie Hopkins' attempt to shame barrister on Twitter for having an Etonian father backfires |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/katie-hopkins-jo-maugham-etonian-father-qc-barrister-twitter-a7917621.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220614/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/katie-hopkins-jo-maugham-etonian-father-qc-barrister-twitter-a7917621.html |archive-date=14 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/31/class-ability-understand-others-background-poverty-wealth|title=We're too fixated on class. What matters is our ability to understand others |date=31 August 2017|work=]}} Article with brief autobiography.</ref> At 16 he had to leave his parents' house after a dispute, and did cleaning work. He went to England in 1989<ref>{{cite web|url=http://twitter.com/jolyonmaugham|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|title=Jo Maugham|website=Twitter|date=9 April 2022|accessdate=9 April 2022}}</ref> and stayed with his mother's father after finishing school.<ref name=corrupt>{{Cite news |title='I don't like acts of dishonesty by the state': Jolyon Maugham QC on Covid cronyism |last=Adams |first=Tim |work=The Observer |date=22 November 2020 |url= https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/nov/22/jolyon-maugham-qc-covid-cronyism-good-law-project }}</ref> Maugham is the son of the novelist ], although they did not meet until Maugham was 17. He was brought up in New Zealand by his English mother, Lynne Joyce Maugham, and his adoptive father, Alan Barker.<ref name='who'/><ref>{{cite news |last=Eleftheriou-Smith |first=Loulla-Mae |date=29 August 2017 |title=Katie Hopkins' attempt to shame barrister on Twitter for having an Etonian father backfires |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/katie-hopkins-jo-maugham-etonian-father-qc-barrister-twitter-a7917621.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220614/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/katie-hopkins-jo-maugham-etonian-father-qc-barrister-twitter-a7917621.html |archive-date=14 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/31/class-ability-understand-others-background-poverty-wealth|title=We're too fixated on class. What matters is our ability to understand others |date=31 August 2017|work=]}} Article with brief autobiography.</ref> At 16 he had to leave his parents' house after a dispute, and did cleaning work. He went to England in 1989<ref>{{cite web|url=http://twitter.com/jolyonmaugham|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|title=Jo Maugham|website=Twitter|date=9 April 2022|accessdate=9 April 2022}}</ref> and stayed with his mother's father after finishing school.<ref name=corrupt>{{Cite news |title='I don't like acts of dishonesty by the state': Jolyon Maugham QC on Covid cronyism |last=Adams |first=Tim |work=The Observer |date=22 November 2020 |url= https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/nov/22/jolyon-maugham-qc-covid-cronyism-good-law-project }}</ref>


Maugham went to ].<ref name='who'/> He graduated with a ] ] in European Legal Studies from ] (]) in 1995.<ref>{{cite book |last=Moyes |first=W.A. |title=Hatfield 1846-1996: A history of Hatfield College in the University of Durham |date=1996 |publisher=Hatfield College Trust |page=315 |isbn=978-0-903324-01-4}}</ref> He also spent some time in Belgium at the ], studying under ],<ref>{{cite web |last1=O'Brien |first1=James |title=Full Disclosure : Jolyon Maugham |url=https://www.globalplayer.com/podcasts/episodes/7DrdALh/ |publisher=] |language=en |format=podcast - 00:33:00 |date=2 September 2021}}</ref> and later completed an ] at ].<ref name="Dev">{{cite web |url=http://www.devereuxchambers.co.uk/barristers/profile/jolyon-maugham |title=Jolyon Maugham QC - Profile |last= |first= |date= |website=devereuxchambers.co.uk |publisher=Devereaux Chambers |archivedate=22 April 2018 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180422143634/http://www.devereuxchambers.co.uk/barristers/profile/jolyon-maugham}}</ref> As a student he was sent by a temping agency to carry out secretarial work at a law firm, but was sent back for being a man. Maugham sued, claiming to be a victim of sex discrimination, and was awarded compensation.<ref name="guardian">{{cite news |last1=Stuart |first1=Liz |last2=Ram |first2=Natasha |title=Jobs and Money: Barristers |url=https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2001/jan/06/features.jobsmoney4 |accessdate=17 September 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=6 January 2001}}</ref> Maugham went to ].<ref name='who'/> He graduated with a ] ] in European Legal Studies from ] (]) in 1995.<ref>{{cite book |last=Moyes |first=W.A. |title=Hatfield 1846-1996: A history of Hatfield College in the University of Durham |date=1996 |publisher=Hatfield College Trust |page=315 |isbn=978-0-903324-01-4}}</ref> He also spent some time in Belgium at the ], studying under ],<ref>{{cite web |last1=O'Brien |first1=James |title=Full Disclosure : Jolyon Maugham |url=https://www.globalplayer.com/podcasts/episodes/7DrdALh/ |publisher=] |language=en |format=podcast - 00:33:00 |date=2 September 2021}}</ref> and later completed an ] at ].<ref name="Dev">{{cite web |url=http://www.devereuxchambers.co.uk/barristers/profile/jolyon-maugham |title=Jolyon Maugham QC - Profile |last= |first= |date= |website=devereuxchambers.co.uk |publisher=Devereaux Chambers |archivedate=22 April 2018 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180422143634/http://www.devereuxchambers.co.uk/barristers/profile/jolyon-maugham}}</ref> As a student he was sent by a temping agency to carry out secretarial work at a law firm, but was sent back for being a man. Maugham sued, claiming to be a victim of sex discrimination, and was awarded compensation.<ref name="guardian">{{cite news |last1=Stuart |first1=Liz |last2=Ram |first2=Natasha |title=Jobs and Money: Barristers |url=https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2001/jan/06/features.jobsmoney4 |accessdate=17 September 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=6 January 2001}}</ref>


==Career==
Maugham completed his ] in the ] of ].<ref name=guardian/> He became a ] in 2015.<ref name="Dev"/> Maugham was a tenant at Devereux Chambers, specialising in taxation law. He left Devereux Chambers at the end of 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/jolyonmaugham/status/1338828720338046976|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|title=Moving offices in advance of my end of year departure from Devereux Chambers|date=15 December 2020|access-date=8 April 2022|website=Twitter|language=en}}</ref> Maugham completed his ] in the ] of ].<ref name=guardian/> Initially practising from chambers in New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, Maugham was latterly a tenant at Devereux Chambers, specialising in taxation law. He was appointed ] in 2015.<ref name="Dev"/> He left Devereux Chambers at the end of 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/jolyonmaugham/status/1338828720338046976|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|title=Moving offices in advance of my end of year departure from Devereux Chambers|date=15 December 2020|access-date=8 April 2022|website=Twitter|language=en}}</ref>


In 2023, Maugham published a book, ''Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple the Powerful'', which looked at three cases and what they can tell us about using the law for social good.<ref>https://guardianbookshop.com/bringing-down-goliath-9780753559789</ref> Yuan Yi Zhu in ] described it as "the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Zhu |first=Yuan Yi |date=2023-06-11 |title=Bringing Down Goliath by Jolyon Maugham review the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC |language=en |work=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bringing-down-goliath-by-jolyon-maugham-review-2x2df8qcx |access-date=2023-06-11 |issn=}}</ref> Maugham claimed that Zhu's negative ''Times'' review was the result of the newapaper's politics, leading to mockery from author ], who said that authors should "never go full Joylon" in response to negative reviews, resulting in a further online spat between Maugham and Rowling.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Heap |first=Emily-Jane |date=2023-04-22 |title=JK Rowling in trans row with Left-wing lawyer over ‘stinker’ book review |language=en-GB |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/04/22/jk-rowling-trans-row-jolyon-maugham-kc-book-review/ |access-date=2023-06-11 |issn=0307-1235}}</ref> In 2023, Maugham published ''Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple the Powerful'', a book that examines three cases and what they can tell us about using the law for social good.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://guardianbookshop.com/bringing-down-goliath-9780753559789 | title=Bringing Down Goliath }}</ref> It made the ''Sunday Times'' bestseller list. The reviewer in the ]' medical ], the '']'', wrote: "Maugham’s blow-by-blow account of the ] will make your blood run cold." They refer to Maugham's description of "a despairing senior civil servant who asked for the 'VIP lane' to be abolished as the PPE sourcing team was 'drowning in VIP requests and "High Priority" contacts that...either do not hold the correct certification or do not pass due diligence'... was crowding out companies who had an actual track record in manufacturing and distributing medical-grade PPE." Summarising the book's importance, the reviewer writes "Here's why you need to read this book. In these days of complex capitalism, every contract has numerous subcontractors and a murky chain of accountability. In such circumstances, investigative journalists and honest, questioning citizens can get only so far, because powerful people lie".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Greenhalgh |first1=Trish |title=Books: Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple The Powerful: Exposing the PPE Profiteering Scandal|location=London|doi-access=free|publisher=]|journal=] |date=August 2023 |volume=73 |issue=733 |pages=366–367 |doi=10.3399/bjgp23X734601|pmc=10405961 }}</ref> Yuan Yi Zhu gave a critical review in '']'' and described it as "the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Zhu |first=Yuan Yi |date=2023-06-11|title=Bringing Down Goliath by Jolyon Maugham review the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC |language=en |work=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bringing-down-goliath-by-jolyon-maugham-review-2x2df8qcx |access-date=2023-06-11 |issn=}}</ref>

==Involvement in politics==


=== Legal challenges to Brexit === === Legal challenges to Brexit ===
Maugham's cases include an unsuccessful case by British ] in Europe who objected to their loss of ],<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Carrol |first=Lisa |date=17 January 2017 |title=Britons tell Dutch court their EU rights cannot be removed |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/17/britons-dutch-court-eu-rights-cannot-be-removed |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Maugham |first=Jolyon |date=1 March 2018 |title=Our rights to EU citizenship are worth fighting for – despite Brexit |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/01/eu-citizenship-brexit-ecj-netherlands |work=The Guardian |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament,<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Leary |first=Elisabeth |date=20 March 2018 |title=Court rules in favour of case on Britain's ability to reverse Brexit |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article50/court-rules-in-favour-of-case-on-britains-ability-to-reverse-brexit-idUSKBN1GW195 |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> and a failed legal challenge to referendum spending by ].<ref>{{cite news |last=George |first=Hannah |title= Anti-Brexit group wins challenge against 'Vote Leave' spending |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/anti-brexit-group-wins-challenge-against-vote-leave-spending-jf3zzsjz |work=] |date=23 March 2018 |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Dickie |first1=Mure |last2=Croft |first2=Jane |title=UK asks Supreme Court to rule on Scottish and Welsh Brexit laws |url=https://www.ft.com/content/8f63a486-4233-11e8-803a-295c97e6fd0b |work=] |date=17 April 2018 |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> Maugham brought an unsuccessful case by British ] in Europe who objected to their loss of ],<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Carrol |first=Lisa |date=17 January 2017 |title=Britons tell Dutch court their EU rights cannot be removed |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/17/britons-dutch-court-eu-rights-cannot-be-removed |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Maugham |first=Jolyon |date=1 March 2018 |title=Our rights to EU citizenship are worth fighting for – despite Brexit |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/01/eu-citizenship-brexit-ecj-netherlands |work=The Guardian |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament,<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Leary |first=Elisabeth |date=20 March 2018 |title=Court rules in favour of case on Britain's ability to reverse Brexit |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article50/court-rules-in-favour-of-case-on-britains-ability-to-reverse-brexit-idUSKBN1GW195 |work=] |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> and a failed legal challenge to referendum spending by ].<ref>{{cite news |last=George |first=Hannah |title= Anti-Brexit group wins challenge against 'Vote Leave' spending |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/anti-brexit-group-wins-challenge-against-vote-leave-spending-jf3zzsjz |work=] |date=23 March 2018 |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Dickie |first1=Mure |last2=Croft |first2=Jane |title=UK asks Supreme Court to rule on Scottish and Welsh Brexit laws |url=https://www.ft.com/content/8f63a486-4233-11e8-803a-295c97e6fd0b |work=] |date=17 April 2018 |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref>


===Affiliations with political parties=== ===Affiliations with political parties===
Maugham had advised the ] on tax policy under ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Swinford |first=Stephen |title=Labour's non-dom adviser represented celebrity tax dodge film schemes |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/11522525/Labours-non-dom-adviser-represented-celebrity-tax-dodge-film-schemes.html |work=] |date=8 April 2015 |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> He was formerly on the advisory council of liberal conservative think tank ], which advises the ].<ref>{{Cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180708125510/https://brightblue.org.uk/about/advisory-council/|archive-date=8 July 2018|url =https://brightblue.org.uk/about/advisory-council/|title=Advisory council |website=brightblue.org.uk |publisher=Bright Blue|date=8 July 2018|access-date=8 July 2018}}</ref> The ''Times'' reported that Maugham "flirted with Labour in the run-up to the 2015 election, harbouring a fleeting fantasy of becoming attorney-general".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Lang|first=Kirsty|title=The activist lawyers taking on the government|newspaper=]|language=en|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-activist-lawyers-taking-on-the-government-n2pbt0nzr|access-date=2021-11-22|issn=0140-0460}}</ref> Maugham had advised the ] on tax policy under ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Swinford |first=Stephen |title=Labour's non-dom adviser represented celebrity tax dodge film schemes |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/11522525/Labours-non-dom-adviser-represented-celebrity-tax-dodge-film-schemes.html |work=] |date=8 April 2015 |access-date=22 April 2018}}</ref> He was formerly on the advisory council of liberal conservative think tank ], which advises the ].<ref>{{Cite web|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180708125510/https://brightblue.org.uk/about/advisory-council/|archive-date=8 July 2018|url =https://brightblue.org.uk/about/advisory-council/|title=Advisory council |website=brightblue.org.uk |publisher=Bright Blue|date=8 July 2018|access-date=8 July 2018}}</ref> The ''Times'' reported that Maugham "flirted with Labour in the run-up to the 2015 election, harbouring a fleeting fantasy of becoming attorney-general, but decided he wasn’t a party political animal".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Lang|first=Kirsty|title=The activist lawyers taking on the government|newspaper=]|language=en|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-activist-lawyers-taking-on-the-government-n2pbt0nzr|access-date=2021-11-22|issn=0140-0460}}</ref>

In April 2017, Maugham reportedly contemplated forming a new ] political party, "''Spring''",<ref name="Buzz">{{cite news | last1 = Di Stefano | first1 = Mark | last2 = Waterson | first2 = Jim | title = People keep trying to start pro-EU British centrist movements on Twitter | url = https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/you-only-get-what-you-give | work = ] | date = 18 October 2017 | access-date = 5 October 2018}}</ref> and standing for election against Prime Minister ] in her constituency of ],<ref>{{cite book | last = Maugham | first = Jolyon | title = Spring The Party | url = https://jolyonmaugham.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/spring-the-party.pdf | date = 17 April 2017 | access-date = 2 October 2018}}</ref> but decided against it.<ref>{{cite web|title=Statement of persons nominated - Maidenhead|url=https://www3.rbwm.gov.uk/downloads/file/3117/statement_of_persons_nominated_-_maidenhead|website=Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead|access-date=2 October 2018|archive-date=2 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170802163820/https://www3.rbwm.gov.uk/downloads/file/3117/statement_of_persons_nominated_-_maidenhead|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = McDonald | first = Karl | title = All the centrist parties that have already failed since Britain voted for Brexit | url = https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/centrist-parties-failed-britain-voted-brexit/ | work = ] | date = 9 April 2018 | access-date = 2 October 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2017/04/jolyon-maugham-an-apology/|title=Jolyon Maugham QC|date=27 April 2017|website=Legal Cheek|access-date=7 January 2019}}</ref>


===The Good Law Project=== ===The Good Law Project===
Maugham is on the Board of the ], a not-for-profit campaign organisation that aims to use the law to protect the interests of the public. Maugham is the founder and Executive Director of the ] (GLP), a not-for-profit campaign organisation that aims to use the law to protect the interests of the public.


During the ], Maugham and the Good Law Project challenged the appointments of key figures in the British government's pandemic response, such as ] and ]. GLP alleged their appointments were the result of a "culture of cronyism and the highly secretive use of billions of pounds of public funds".<ref name=corrupt/> In June 2021, the challenge against the appointment of Bingham was dropped.<ref>In 2022 he lost on all points in his case against Harding{{Cite web|date=2021-06-23|title=Legal action over Kate Bingham's role in UK Covid vaccine taskforce dropped|url=http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jun/23/legal-action-over-kate-bingham-role-in-uk-covid-vaccine-taskforce-dropped|access-date=2021-11-22|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> Bingham's work on the UK's ] has been praised by scientists and international media,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Landler |first1=Mark |last2=Mueller |first2=Benjamin |date=2021-01-29 |title=Vaccine Rollout Gives U.K. a Rare Win in the Pandemic |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/29/world/europe/covid-vaccine-uk.html |access-date=2021-05-02 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Balls |first=Katy |date=6 February 2021 |title=Secrets of the Vaccine Taskforce's success |url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/secrets-of-the-vaccine-taskforces-success |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210204043845/https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/secrets-of-the-vaccine-taskforces-success |archive-date=4 February 2021 |access-date=2021-05-02 |website=www.spectator.co.uk}}</ref><ref name=":12">{{Cite web |last=Cookson |first=Clive |date=13 November 2020 |title=Scientists defend controversial head of UK vaccine task force |url=https://www.ft.com/content/9f08cd41-c895-4138-ba37-6f9c36fcef31 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201113154502/https://www.ft.com/content/9f08cd41-c895-4138-ba37-6f9c36fcef31 |archive-date=13 November 2020 |access-date=2021-05-02 |website=Financial Times}}</ref> particularly for securing 350 million doses of six vaccines and setting up infrastructure for clinical trials, manufacturing and distribution.<ref name=":12" /> During the ], the Good Law Project joined with the ] in challenging the appointments of key figures in the British government's pandemic response, such as ] and ]. GLP alleged their appointments were the result of a "culture of cronyism and the highly secretive use of billions of pounds of public funds".<ref name=corrupt/> In June 2021, the challenge against the appointment of Bingham was dropped.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2021-06-23|title=Legal action over Kate Bingham's role in UK Covid vaccine taskforce dropped|url=http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jun/23/legal-action-over-kate-bingham-role-in-uk-covid-vaccine-taskforce-dropped|access-date=2021-11-22|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> The court ruled that the GLP did not have standing to bring the claims, but for the Runnymede claim ruled that the health secretary, ], failed to comply with his equality duty in making the appointments.<ref>{{cite web |title=Matt Hancock failed in equality duty over Covid appointments|date=15 February 2022 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60386670 |website=bbc.co.uk |publisher=BBC |access-date=28 October 2024}}</ref>


In November 2021, a company which supplied face shields during the COVID-19 pandemic announced it was suing GLP for defamation after it alleged the firm had obtained its contract through political connections and had supplied substandard equipment, without evidence.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2021-11-10|title=Stroud company to sue the Good Law Project over PPE claims|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-59223699|access-date=2021-11-22}}</ref> The same month, Maugham had to apologize on behalf of GLP to the Health Secretary and the High Court after breaching civil procedure rules in a case concerning the supply of PPE equipment.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hyde2021-11-15T16:56:00+00:00|first=John|title=Maugham apologises for Good Law Project's procedure rules mistake|url=https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/maugham-apologises-for-good-law-projects-procedure-rules-mistake/5110551.article|access-date=2021-11-22|website=Law Gazette|language=en}}</ref> In November 2021, the company Platform 14, which supplied face shields during the ] said it would sue GLP for defamation after GLP alleged the firm had obtained its £120m contract through political connections and had supplied substandard equipment.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2021-11-10|title=Stroud company to sue the Good Law Project over PPE claims|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-59223699|access-date=2021-11-22}}</ref>{{update needed|reason=Did Platform 14 bring a suit against GLP?|date=October 2024}} In a separate case, regarding the award of ] contracts to healthcare company ], Maugham apologised on behalf of GLP to the Health Secretary and the High Court for publishing a witness statement which had not been entered into evidence in the case, a breach of civil procedure rules.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Hyde2021-11-15T16:56:00+00:00|first=John|title=Maugham apologises for Good Law Project's procedure rules mistake|url=https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/maugham-apologises-for-good-law-projects-procedure-rules-mistake/5110551.article|access-date=2021-11-22|website=Law Gazette|language=en}}</ref>


A 2022 profile in ''The Times'' described him as "the ] of the Bar", who "rose from relative obscurity to found the Good Law Project".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Baksi |first=Catherine |date=24 February 2022 |title=Judges slap down busybody litigants |work=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/judges-slap-down-busybody-litigants-3xjqnqmds}}</ref>
=== Transgender rights ===
Maugham has been an outspoken supporter of ] and as of November 2020 is representing a ] in a lawsuit against the ] over treatment delays.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Hunte|first=Ben|date=2020-11-23|title=Trans teen in legal action over gender clinic wait|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55015959|url-status=live|access-date=2020-12-22}}</ref> As of June 2021, Maugham is involved in an appeal against a decision to award charitable status to ] on the basis that it did not "meet the threshold tests to be registered as a charity";<ref>{{cite web |last1=Parsons |first1=Vic |title=LGBT+ groups appeal decision to register anti-trans LGB Alliance as charity |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/06/02/lgb-alliance-charity-commission-status-appeal-mermaids-good-law-project-trans/ |website=] |access-date=2 June 2021 |date=2 June 2021}}</ref> Maugham has spoken publicly about the charity, which he accused of being "a transphobic hate group."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Parsons |first1=Vic |title=What we can learn from LGB Alliance, Keira Bell and the hostile anti-trans media |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/04/27/good-law-project-jolyon-maugham-trans-rights-uk-keira-bell-puberty-blockers-lgb-alliance/ |website=] |access-date=2 June 2021 |date=27 April 2021}}</ref>


=== Transgender matters ===
==Controversies==
Maugham has been an outspoken supporter of ] and as of November 2020 is representing a ] in a lawsuit against the ] over treatment delays.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Hunte|first=Ben|date=2020-11-23|title=Trans teen in legal action over gender clinic wait|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55015959|access-date=2020-12-22}}</ref>


As of June 2021, Maugham was involved in an appeal by ] against a decision to award charitable status to ]. The appeal was made on the basis of the notion that LGB Alliance did not meet the threshold tests to be registered as a charity.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Parsons |first1=Vic |title=LGBT+ groups appeal decision to register anti-trans LGB Alliance as charity |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/06/02/lgb-alliance-charity-commission-status-appeal-mermaids-good-law-project-trans/ |website=] |access-date=2 June 2021 |date=2 June 2021}}</ref> Maugham has spoken publicly about the charity, which he described as "a transphobic hate group."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Parsons |first1=Vic |title=What we can learn from LGB Alliance, Keira Bell and the hostile anti-trans media |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/04/27/good-law-project-jolyon-maugham-trans-rights-uk-keira-bell-puberty-blockers-lgb-alliance/ |website=] |access-date=2 June 2021 |date=27 April 2021}}</ref> Mermaids lost the appeal.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gentleman |first1=Amelia |title=Trans children’s charity Mermaids fails to have charitable status stripped from LGB Alliance|date=6 July 2023 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/06/trans-charity-mermaids-fails-to-have-charitable-status-stripped-from-lgb-alliance |website=theguardian.com |publisher=Guardian |access-date=1 October 2023}}</ref>
=== Criticism of judges ===
In 2019, Maugham was criticized by many in the legal community after he accused two High Court judges, ] and ], of being biased in favour of the government after Mr Justice Swift refused permission to Good Law Project to bring a legal challenge against Brexit.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McKinney |first=CJ |date=26 March 2019 |title=Jolyon Maugham QC suffers backlash on Twitter after calling High Court judge 'pro-Government' |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2019/03/jolyon-maugham-qc-suffers-backlash-on-twitter-after-calling-high-court-judge-pro-government/ |website=Legal Cheek}}</ref>

In 2021, Maugham was further criticized for suggesting that ] was transphobic after she ruled in '']'' that it was unlikely that a child under the age of 16 could be ''Gillick'' competent to consent to puberty blocking treatment.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-04-10 |title=A QC’s truth {{!}} Sarah Phillimore |url=https://thecritic.co.uk/the-truth-must-be-spoken/ |access-date=2023-06-22 |website=The Critic Magazine |language=en-GB}}</ref>

===Doxing of home address===
In late 2019 Maugham accused the ] presenter ] of ] at a time when he was receiving ]s.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> He also criticised the television programme ] for allowing Hartley-Brewer to appear as a panellist.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Hartley-Brewer defended herself by saying Maugham's address was already easily available online and that he had previously revealed it himself in published interviews.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott>{{cite news|last=Bond|first=Kimberley|date=10 October 2019|title=Julia Hartley-Brewer to feature on Question Time despite boycott|url=https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2019-10-10/julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/|work=]|accessdate=29 December 2019}}</ref>

===Killing of a fox===
{{tweet
|text = Already this morning I have killed a fox with a baseball bat. How's your Boxing Day going?
|name = Jolyon Maugham QC
|username = JolyonMaugham
|date = 26 December 2019
|ID = 1210110735189233665
}}
On the morning of 26 December 2019 (]), Maugham stated in a ] post that he had "killed a fox with a baseball bat" whilst wearing his wife's ].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last=Booth |first=William |date=30 December 2019 |title=A British barrister was famous for battling Brexit. Then he beat a fox to death, while wearing a kimono. |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/a-british-barrister-was-known-for-battling-brexit-then-he-beat-a-fox-to-death-while-wearing-a-kimono/2019/12/30/64c50612-2aed-11ea-bffe-020c88b3f120_story.html}}</ref> Maugham claimed that the fox was entrapped by the netting surrounding a hen house in his garden. The killing drew widespread condemnation and received extensive coverage, domestically and internationally.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /> The ] investigated the matter,<ref>{{cite news|date=27 December 2019|title=RSPCA investigates after lawyer Jolyon Maugham kills fox with baseball bat|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50919327|work=]|accessdate=29 December 2019}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite news|last=Gayle|first=Damien|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer Jolyon Maugham clubs fox to death while wearing kimono|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/26/prominent-lawyer-jolyon-maugham-tweets-about-clubbing-a-fox-to-death|work=]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/27/rspca-investigates-after-lawyer-jolyon-maugham-kills-fox|title=RSPCA investigates after lawyer Jolyon Maugham kills fox|last=Gayle|first=Damien|date=2019-12-27|work=]|access-date=2019-12-27}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite news|last=Dearden|first=Lizzie|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer sparks backlash with tweet about 'killing fox with baseball bat'|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jolyon-maugham-tweet-kill-fox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220614/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jolyon-maugham-tweet-kill-fox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-date=14 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Doherty-Cove|first=Jody|date=27 December 2019|title=Sussex windmill owner 'killed fox with baseball bat'|url=https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/18124662.sussex-windmill-owner-killed-fox-baseball-bat/|work=]|accessdate=27 December 2019}}</ref> but decided not to prosecute because a post-mortem showed the fox had been killed swiftly, meaning that "the evidential threshold needed to take a prosecution under the ] code was not met".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51755899 |title=Fox-killing lawyer Jolyon Maugham will not be charged, says RSPCA |date=5 March 2020 |accessdate=22 May 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref>


In 2023, Maugham was criticised by the judge in the trial of the ] for a tweet he had made alleging transphobia by the defendants. He deleted the tweet and subsequently apologised.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pidd |first1=Helen |title=Why Brianna Ghey police quickly ruled out transphobia as motive|date=20 December 2023 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/dec/20/why-brianna-ghey-police-quickly-ruled-out-transphobia-as-motive |website=theguardian.com |publisher=Guardian |access-date=22 December 2023}}</ref>
In 2021, Maugham claimed he and his chambers were blacklisted by law firm ] after he killed the fox.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Connelly |first=Thomas |date=15 February 2021 |title=Jo Maugham QC claims Allen & Overy blacklisted him and his chambers |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2021/02/jo-maugham-qc-claims-ao-blacklisted-him-and-his-chambers/}}</ref>


=== Breach of court rules === ===Other matters===
In 2021, Maugham had to apologize after Good Law Project published a witness statement before it was put into evidence, thus breaching High Court litigation rules.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hyde |first=John |date=15 November 2021 |title=Maugham apologises for Good Law Project's procedure rules mistake |work=The Law Society Gazette |url=https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/maugham-apologises-for-good-law-projects-procedure-rules-mistake/5110551.article}}</ref>


In 2019, Maugham said that two High Court judges, ] and ], were biased in favour of the government following Mr Justice Swift's refusal of permission to Good Law Project to bring a legal challenge against Brexit. Maugham was criticised by other lawyers on the social network site ] for the statement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McKinney |first=CJ |date=26 March 2019 |title=Jolyon Maugham QC suffers backlash on Twitter after calling High Court judge 'pro-Government' |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2019/03/jolyon-maugham-qc-suffers-backlash-on-twitter-after-calling-high-court-judge-pro-government/ |website=Legal Cheek}}</ref>
=== Apologies for social media statements ===
In 2020, Maugham had to apologize after comparing ] breaching COVID-19 lockdown rules to ‘a man with HIV having unprotected sex’, which was widely decried as offensive.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Milton |first=Josh |date=25 May 2020 |title=Lawyer best-known for clubbing a fox to death apologises after comparing Dominic Cummings to 'a man with HIV having unprotected sex' |url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/05/25/jolyon-maugham-coronavirus-covid-19-hiv-dominic-cummings-durham/ |website=]}}</ref>


In late 2019 Maugham referred to the ] presenter ] having ] at a time when he was receiving ]s.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Maugham criticised the television programme ] for allowing Hartley-Brewer to appear as a panellist. There was considerable criticism of the decision on social networks and a campaign to boycott Question Time in view of its decision to feature Hartley-Brewer following her actions.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/> Hartley-Brewer said Maugham's address was already easily available online and that he had previously revealed it himself in published interviews.<ref name=radio-times-julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott>{{cite news|last=Bond|first=Kimberley|date=10 October 2019|title=Julia Hartley-Brewer to feature on Question Time despite boycott|url=https://www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2019-10-10/julia-hartley-brewer-to-feature-on-question-time-despite-boycott/|work=]|accessdate=29 December 2019}}</ref>
In 2022, Maugham was forced to apologize after falsely claiming he won a judicial review against ], the former ], in which he had claimed that ] and ] were given appointments because of their "personal or political connections" to politicians. The High Court had in fact ruled that "The evidence provides no support for this at all. Baroness Harding had previous relevant experience of senior positions in large retail businesses and in the NHS. Mr Coupe had vast experience of managing complex public-facing organisations".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Willems |first=Michiel |date=17 February 2022 |title=Barrister Jolyon Maugham QC apologises for falsely claiming court victory against Matt Hancock |url=https://www.cityam.com/barrister-jolyon-maugham-qc-apologises-for-falsely-claiming-court-victory-against-matt-hancock/ |website=City A.M.}}</ref>


On 26 December 2019 (]), Maugham stated in a ] post that he had "killed a fox with a baseball bat".<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last=Booth |first=William |date=30 December 2019 |title=A British barrister was famous for battling Brexit. Then he beat a fox to death, while wearing a kimono. |newspaper=] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/a-british-barrister-was-known-for-battling-brexit-then-he-beat-a-fox-to-death-while-wearing-a-kimono/2019/12/30/64c50612-2aed-11ea-bffe-020c88b3f120_story.html}}</ref> Maugham said that the fox was entrapped by the netting surrounding a hen house in his garden. The killing drew widespread condemnation and received extensive coverage, domestically and internationally.{{refn|name=foxpress|<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />}} The ] investigated the matter,<ref name=":0">{{cite news|last=Gayle|first=Damien|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer Jolyon Maugham clubs fox to death while wearing kimono|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/26/prominent-lawyer-jolyon-maugham-tweets-about-clubbing-a-fox-to-death|work=]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite news|last=Dearden|first=Lizzie|date=26 December 2019|title=Prominent lawyer sparks backlash with tweet about 'killing fox with baseball bat'|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jolyon-maugham-tweet-kill-fox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220614/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jolyon-maugham-tweet-kill-fox-baseball-bat-lawyer-reaction-a9260486.html |archive-date=14 June 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|work=]|accessdate=26 December 2019}}</ref> but decided not to prosecute because a post-mortem showed the fox had been killed swiftly, meaning that "the evidential threshold needed to take a prosecution under the ] code was not met".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51755899 |title=Fox-killing lawyer Jolyon Maugham will not be charged, says RSPCA |date=5 March 2020 |accessdate=22 May 2020 |publisher=BBC}}</ref> In 2021, Maugham said that he and his chambers were blacklisted by law firm ] as a result of the incident.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Connelly |first=Thomas |date=15 February 2021 |title=Jo Maugham QC claims Allen & Overy blacklisted him and his chambers |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2021/02/jo-maugham-qc-claims-ao-blacklisted-him-and-his-chambers/}}</ref>
==See also==
*]
*]


==References== ==References==

Latest revision as of 16:16, 10 November 2024

British barrister (born 1971)

Jolyon MaughamKC
Maugham in 2017
BornJolyon Toby Dennis Maugham
(1971-07-01) 1 July 1971 (age 53)
St Pancras, London, England
NationalityBritish, New Zealander
Education
OccupationBarrister
Known forBrexit litigation
Spouse Claire Prihartini ​(m. 2007)
FatherDavid Benedictus

Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham KC (/mɔːm/; born 1 July 1971) is a British barrister. Initially a practitioner in contentious taxation law, he stepped away in order to act as the founder and director of the Good Law Project, through which he has played a role in bringing to court a number of legal challenges to the Brexit process. He has written on Brexit and legal issues for publications such as The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and the New Statesman. He published his first book in 2023.

Early life

Maugham is the son of the novelist David Benedictus, although they did not meet until Maugham was 17. He was brought up in New Zealand by his English mother, Lynne Joyce Maugham, and his adoptive father, Alan Barker. At 16 he had to leave his parents' house after a dispute, and did cleaning work. He went to England in 1989 and stayed with his mother's father after finishing school.

Maugham went to Wellington High School, New Zealand. He graduated with a first-class LLB in European Legal Studies from Durham University (Hatfield College) in 1995. He also spent some time in Belgium at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, studying under Walter Van Gerven, and later completed an MA at Birkbeck, University of London. As a student he was sent by a temping agency to carry out secretarial work at a law firm, but was sent back for being a man. Maugham sued, claiming to be a victim of sex discrimination, and was awarded compensation.

Career

Maugham completed his pupillage in the chambers of Lord Irvine. Initially practising from chambers in New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, Maugham was latterly a tenant at Devereux Chambers, specialising in taxation law. He was appointed Queen's Counsel in 2015. He left Devereux Chambers at the end of 2020.

In 2023, Maugham published Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple the Powerful, a book that examines three cases and what they can tell us about using the law for social good. It made the Sunday Times bestseller list. The reviewer in the Royal College of General Practitioners' medical journal, the British Journal of General Practice, wrote: "Maugham’s blow-by-blow account of the PPE fiasco will make your blood run cold." They refer to Maugham's description of "a despairing senior civil servant who asked for the 'VIP lane' to be abolished as the PPE sourcing team was 'drowning in VIP requests and "High Priority" contacts that...either do not hold the correct certification or do not pass due diligence'... was crowding out companies who had an actual track record in manufacturing and distributing medical-grade PPE." Summarising the book's importance, the reviewer writes "Here's why you need to read this book. In these days of complex capitalism, every contract has numerous subcontractors and a murky chain of accountability. In such circumstances, investigative journalists and honest, questioning citizens can get only so far, because powerful people lie". Yuan Yi Zhu gave a critical review in The Times and described it as "the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC".

Legal challenges to Brexit

Maugham brought an unsuccessful case by British expatriates in Europe who objected to their loss of European Union citizenship, a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament, and a failed legal challenge to referendum spending by Vote Leave.

Affiliations with political parties

Maugham had advised the Labour Party on tax policy under Ed Miliband. He was formerly on the advisory council of liberal conservative think tank Bright Blue, which advises the Conservative Party. The Times reported that Maugham "flirted with Labour in the run-up to the 2015 election, harbouring a fleeting fantasy of becoming attorney-general, but decided he wasn’t a party political animal".

The Good Law Project

Maugham is the founder and Executive Director of the Good Law Project (GLP), a not-for-profit campaign organisation that aims to use the law to protect the interests of the public.

During the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, the Good Law Project joined with the Runnymede Trust in challenging the appointments of key figures in the British government's pandemic response, such as Kate Bingham and Dido Harding. GLP alleged their appointments were the result of a "culture of cronyism and the highly secretive use of billions of pounds of public funds". In June 2021, the challenge against the appointment of Bingham was dropped. The court ruled that the GLP did not have standing to bring the claims, but for the Runnymede claim ruled that the health secretary, Matt Hancock, failed to comply with his equality duty in making the appointments.

In November 2021, the company Platform 14, which supplied face shields during the COVID-19 pandemic said it would sue GLP for defamation after GLP alleged the firm had obtained its £120m contract through political connections and had supplied substandard equipment. In a separate case, regarding the award of PPE contracts to healthcare company Abingdon Health, Maugham apologised on behalf of GLP to the Health Secretary and the High Court for publishing a witness statement which had not been entered into evidence in the case, a breach of civil procedure rules.

A 2022 profile in The Times described him as "the Marmite of the Bar", who "rose from relative obscurity to found the Good Law Project".

Transgender matters

Maugham has been an outspoken supporter of transgender rights and as of November 2020 is representing a transgender boy in a lawsuit against the NHS over treatment delays.

As of June 2021, Maugham was involved in an appeal by Mermaids against a decision to award charitable status to LGB Alliance. The appeal was made on the basis of the notion that LGB Alliance did not meet the threshold tests to be registered as a charity. Maugham has spoken publicly about the charity, which he described as "a transphobic hate group." Mermaids lost the appeal.

In 2023, Maugham was criticised by the judge in the trial of the murder of Brianna Ghey for a tweet he had made alleging transphobia by the defendants. He deleted the tweet and subsequently apologised.

Other matters

In 2019, Maugham said that two High Court judges, Mr Justice Swift and Mr Justice Supperstone, were biased in favour of the government following Mr Justice Swift's refusal of permission to Good Law Project to bring a legal challenge against Brexit. Maugham was criticised by other lawyers on the social network site Twitter for the statement.

In late 2019 Maugham referred to the Talkradio presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer having revealed his home address at a time when he was receiving death threats. Maugham criticised the television programme Question Time for allowing Hartley-Brewer to appear as a panellist. There was considerable criticism of the decision on social networks and a campaign to boycott Question Time in view of its decision to feature Hartley-Brewer following her actions. Hartley-Brewer said Maugham's address was already easily available online and that he had previously revealed it himself in published interviews.

On 26 December 2019 (Boxing Day), Maugham stated in a Twitter post that he had "killed a fox with a baseball bat". Maugham said that the fox was entrapped by the netting surrounding a hen house in his garden. The killing drew widespread condemnation and received extensive coverage, domestically and internationally. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals investigated the matter, but decided not to prosecute because a post-mortem showed the fox had been killed swiftly, meaning that "the evidential threshold needed to take a prosecution under the CPS code was not met". In 2021, Maugham said that he and his chambers were blacklisted by law firm Allen & Overy as a result of the incident.

References

  1. ^ "Maugham, Jolyon Toby Dennis". Who's Who. Oxford: A & C Black. 2015. doi:10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U283232. ISBN 978-0-19-954088-4.
  2. ^ "Jolyon Maugham QC - Profile". devereuxchambers.co.uk. Devereaux Chambers. Archived from the original on 22 April 2018.
  3. Maugham, Jolyon (19 November 2016). "How Nicola Sturgeon could shake up 'cosy consensus' and use Article 50 to wrest back control of Scotland's future". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  4. "Jolyon Maugham". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  5. "Jolyon Maugham". New Statesman. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  6. Eleftheriou-Smith, Loulla-Mae (29 August 2017). "Katie Hopkins' attempt to shame barrister on Twitter for having an Etonian father backfires". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  7. Maugham, Jolyon (31 August 2017). "We're too fixated on class. What matters is our ability to understand others". The Guardian. Article with brief autobiography.
  8. Maugham, Jolyon (9 April 2022). "Jo Maugham". Twitter. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  9. ^ Adams, Tim (22 November 2020). "'I don't like acts of dishonesty by the state': Jolyon Maugham QC on Covid cronyism". The Observer.
  10. Moyes, W.A. (1996). Hatfield 1846-1996: A history of Hatfield College in the University of Durham. Hatfield College Trust. p. 315. ISBN 978-0-903324-01-4.
  11. O'Brien, James (2 September 2021). "Full Disclosure : Jolyon Maugham" (podcast - 00:33:00). LBC.
  12. ^ Stuart, Liz; Ram, Natasha (6 January 2001). "Jobs and Money: Barristers". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
  13. Maugham, Jolyon (15 December 2020). "Moving offices in advance of my end of year departure from Devereux Chambers". Twitter. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  14. "Bringing Down Goliath".
  15. Greenhalgh, Trish (August 2023). "Books: Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple The Powerful: Exposing the PPE Profiteering Scandal". British Journal of General Practice. 73 (733). London: Royal College of General Practitioners: 366–367. doi:10.3399/bjgp23X734601. PMC 10405961.
  16. Zhu, Yuan Yi (11 June 2023). "Bringing Down Goliath by Jolyon Maugham review — the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC". The Times. Retrieved 11 June 2023.
  17. O'Carrol, Lisa (17 January 2017). "Britons tell Dutch court their EU rights cannot be removed". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  18. Maugham, Jolyon (1 March 2018). "Our rights to EU citizenship are worth fighting for – despite Brexit". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  19. O'Leary, Elisabeth (20 March 2018). "Court rules in favour of case on Britain's ability to reverse Brexit". Reuters. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  20. George, Hannah (23 March 2018). "Anti-Brexit group wins challenge against 'Vote Leave' spending". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  21. Dickie, Mure; Croft, Jane (17 April 2018). "UK asks Supreme Court to rule on Scottish and Welsh Brexit laws". Financial Times. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  22. Swinford, Stephen (8 April 2015). "Labour's non-dom adviser represented celebrity tax dodge film schemes". The Telegraph. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  23. "Advisory council". brightblue.org.uk. Bright Blue. 8 July 2018. Archived from the original on 8 July 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
  24. Lang, Kirsty. "The activist lawyers taking on the government". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  25. "Legal action over Kate Bingham's role in UK Covid vaccine taskforce dropped". The Guardian. 23 June 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  26. "Matt Hancock failed in equality duty over Covid appointments". bbc.co.uk. BBC. 15 February 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2024.
  27. "Stroud company to sue the Good Law Project over PPE claims". BBC News. 10 November 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  28. Hyde2021-11-15T16:56:00+00:00, John. "Maugham apologises for Good Law Project's procedure rules mistake". Law Gazette. Retrieved 22 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  29. Baksi, Catherine (24 February 2022). "Judges slap down busybody litigants". The Times.
  30. Hunte, Ben (23 November 2020). "Trans teen in legal action over gender clinic wait". BBC News. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
  31. Parsons, Vic (2 June 2021). "LGBT+ groups appeal decision to register anti-trans LGB Alliance as charity". PinkNews. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  32. Parsons, Vic (27 April 2021). "What we can learn from LGB Alliance, Keira Bell and the hostile anti-trans media". PinkNews. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  33. Gentleman, Amelia (6 July 2023). "Trans children's charity Mermaids fails to have charitable status stripped from LGB Alliance". theguardian.com. Guardian. Retrieved 1 October 2023.
  34. Pidd, Helen (20 December 2023). "Why Brianna Ghey police quickly ruled out transphobia as motive". theguardian.com. Guardian. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  35. McKinney, CJ (26 March 2019). "Jolyon Maugham QC suffers backlash on Twitter after calling High Court judge 'pro-Government'". Legal Cheek.
  36. ^ Bond, Kimberley (10 October 2019). "Julia Hartley-Brewer to feature on Question Time despite boycott". Radio Times. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
  37. ^ Gayle, Damien (26 December 2019). "Prominent lawyer Jolyon Maugham clubs fox to death while wearing kimono". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  38. ^ Booth, William (30 December 2019). "A British barrister was famous for battling Brexit. Then he beat a fox to death, while wearing a kimono". The Washington Post.
  39. ^ Dearden, Lizzie (26 December 2019). "Prominent lawyer sparks backlash with tweet about 'killing fox with baseball bat'". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2022. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  40. "Fox-killing lawyer Jolyon Maugham will not be charged, says RSPCA". BBC. 5 March 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  41. Connelly, Thomas (15 February 2021). "Jo Maugham QC claims Allen & Overy blacklisted him and his chambers".

External links

Categories: