Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Russia: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:53, 4 August 2023 editEzhiki (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,314 edits Russian Empire subdivisions' translations: another cmt← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:32, 6 January 2025 edit undoAlaexis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,793 edits Proposing the Draft:Feodorovsky Gorodok with source issues: ReplyTag: Reply 
(260 intermediate revisions by 90 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
] ]
{{talk header}} {{talk header}}
{{WikiProject Russia|class=Project|importance=NA|notaskforce=yes}} {{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=NA|notaskforce=yes}}
}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-12-12/WikiProject report|writer= ]| ||day =12|month=December|year=2011}} {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-12-12/WikiProject report|writer= ]| ||day =12|month=December|year=2011}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-02-12/WikiProject report|writer=]||day=12|month=February|year=2014}} {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-02-12/WikiProject report|writer=]||day=12|month=February|year=2014}}
Line 18: Line 20:
}} }}


== Page move request ==
==] has been nominated for discussion==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for '''deletion'''. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify-->—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">May 6, 2016</span>; 12:47 (UTC)

== equal marriages Romanov Bagration . ==

When Princess Tatiana Konstantinovna , daughter of G-D Konstantine Konstantinovich, obtained the consent of her father to marry Konstantine Bagration and of course the blessing of HIM Nicholas II, she signed an official renouncement to their future children's rights, and that was BEFORE the abdication of the Romanov dynasty. So did her niece Ekaterina Ioannovna, princess of the Imperial Blood, in the late thirties, when she married Ruggero, marchese (in italian, or marquess, it means the same,) Farace di Villaforesta, for their children. Neither of these children : Nicoletta, Fiammetta and Ivan Farace ever considered themselves as heirs.... but Ivan, now marchese Farace di Villaforesta, is an active honorary member of the Family Association since his mother passed away in 2007. Like HM the King of Greece, Prince Michael of Kent, and other members of the Family, not necess<ref></ref>arily of the Dynasty. If Konstantine was not equal to Tatiana Konstantinovna, Leonida was not equal to Vladimir Kirilovich.( Who was not a grand duke himself, according to the Laws, it was a "titre de courtoisie"...). This is simple and clear . Grand dukes, during the last years of the Empire, were only brothers, children and grand children of the Emperor. The sons of GD Konstantine Konstantinovich were born as grand dukes, but became princes when the Laws were modified, before the end or the monarchy. The last Emperor was GD Mikhail for a very short time, and all the grand dukes and grand duchesses are now dead, alas.
'''Sources : myself, marchesa Farace di Villaforesta'''<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small>

== Antarctica ==

I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage-->

== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – ]] 16:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 09:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

== ] ==

Good morning. The paragraph "Notable people" is organized and structured very badly, to the point that I would rather not change anything, because I could be wrong, since in some parts it is not understandable at all, and in all other parts almost nothing is understood. For example, it's not clear (due to the incorrect or lack of use of commas, to distinguish one known person from another) who is who (e.g., the name of a singer is present, but his genre (i.e. 'classical') is not specified; the singer in question is Yuri Bashmet; its genre is not "pop", but "classical" (within the subparagraph "Musicians, composers and singers")). Could someone take care of the paragraph I refer to and put it in order? Page: ]. ] (]) 22:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (] • ]) 13:46, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

== Russian-speaker needed ==

Hello, I need the help of someone who speaks Russian. Context at ]. Does this source say that the 1411th ammunition depot was in Voznesensk from July 1945 to May 1949, or that it took that timeframe to move it from Voznesensk to Cobasna and that we therefore don't know when was it first moved to Voznesensk? ] ] ] 07:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

:It literally says that the depot was being moved to Voznesensk from July 1945 to May 1949, and that the depot is now located in Cobasna. ] (]) 07:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
::Would it then be accurate to say that the depot was located in Kungur on 28 July 1941–July 1945, in Voznesensk in July 1945–May 1949 and in Cobasna from May 1949 onwards? ] ] ] 08:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
:::Approximately yes. My understanding is that 1945 to 1949 was the transition period, when the depot was being moved. I do not think the source goes into more details. ] (]) 08:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
::::Ok, thank you for your help. ] ] ] 09:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

== Ruble vs rouble ==

There is a discussion at ] that may interest members of this project. <span style="border:1px solid blue;border-radius:4px;color:blue;box-shadow: 3px 3px 4px grey;">]&nbsp;<span style="font-size:xx-small; vertical-align:top">]&nbsp;</span></span> 11:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

:<s>My opinion is that "ruble" is specifically North American English and that unless an article is tagged "use American/Canadian English" then "rouble" is to be preferred as this is used in more forms of English than "ruble". Non-American sources almost universally use "rouble", such as the European Central Bank (and the English websites of all EU national central banks), Reuters, the Oxford English Dictionary, and Goznak. ] (]) 12:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)</s> <small>Ban-evasion by ] ] (]) 14:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)</small>
::<s>Much of the support for "ruble" over "rouble" on Misplaced Pages outside of articles specifically written in North American English seems to be a result of regional bias and some degree of ]. A certain editor who had something of an obsession with trying to force one of the spellings depended entirely on using American sources and cherrypicking minor uses elsewhere (which were usually direct quotes from a specific person or fringe sources of little overall importance). ] (]) 05:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC)</s> <small>Ban-evasion by ] ] (]) 14:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)</small>

== Merger proposal ==
There is currently a discussion on whether to merge ] into ] underway ], for which input from members of the WikiProject would be very valuable. ] (]) 17:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

== Merging ] into ] ==

There is currently a discussion ongoing on whether to merge ] back into ] underway ], for which further input would be very valuable. ] (]) 18:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

== Using an image non-freely licensed on the Russian Misplaced Pages here? ==

As the title states, I was wondering if ] could be used on this Misplaced Pages? I am writing an article for the Urta-Bulak gas field and I feel like the image would serve as a useful illustration. I am unsure of how to navigate copyright surrounding images, so any help is appreciated. TIA. ]. '']'' ''<sub><small>]</small></sub>'' 02:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

:It is used on a ] basis in ru-wiki. To be on the safe side I would re-upload it to en-wiki as the fair use criteria may be different for different wikipedias. ]<sub>]</sub> 12:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
::Yes, I think so too. Do you think it is a good image, however? There are other examples on the Internet, but apparently it is from a documentary called "Extinguishing with a Nuclear Charge. 1074 Days of Burning", but, I cannot find the original. Keen to hear your thoughts. ]. '']'' ''<sub><small>]</small></sub>'' 10:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

== WikiProject Russia template parameters ==

Hello! I've been editing many WikiProject Russia templates at the talk pages of Russian city/town/village articles, and I have two questions. Firstly, does <code>|humgeo=yes</code> belong in every city article (e.g., ])? And secondly, is it also acceptable to add the <code>|imageneeded=</code> parameter to articles that lack images? Thank you. ] (]'''-''']) 21:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

:Pinging {{u|Ezhiki}} and {{u|Slon02}}, who are active in this WikiProject. ] (]'''-''']) 13:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
::Thank you for working on these, Nythar! All cities (and populated places in general) are within scope of "human geography", so if you see a humgeo parameter missing, please add it. And also "yes" on the second question (although I'm not sure how many people are actively working on finding/adding images, but at least it'll be tagged). Cheers,—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">June 23, 2023</span>; 13:36 (UTC) 13:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

==AS-28==
I've suggested that ] be split to ], as the majority of the article is about its rescue, so should exist as an accident article instead of a sub article. For the discussion, please see ] -- ] (]) 23:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – ]] 09:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 00:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

==Input requested==
There is a discussion at the ] on July 14 about the "Age of majority and Russian monarchs". If you can contribute that would be great. Regards, --<span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:orange">]</span> ] 23:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

== "There are 5 streets." ==
This exact sentence shows up in ''a lot'' of Russian village/locality/selo articles, sometimes with a citation and sometimes not. I've been changing the "5" to "five" per ], got 36 today, and am beginning to doubt whether it's even true. Can anyone who reads Russian or knows about rural civic planning shed some light on the situation (or could someone who runs bots mass delete the string if it's a lie)? ] (]) 04:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

:I think that these articles were created automatically and just state the number of streets a given settlement has. It's not necessarily five, ] has only four, for example. ]<sub>]</sub> 06:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
::That's a relief. But even there, how does the autocreator know? Is there a database? ] (]) 07:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
:::Yes, I'm pretty sure you can download it yourself here https://fias.nalog.ru/Frontend. ]<sub>]</sub> 09:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
::::I won't, but thanks, good to know! ] (]) 22:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::I'm not even sure this is a fact worth including, referenced or not. The population count gives a far more accurate estimation of the rural locality's size than the number of streets (which can range from 1–2 houses to hundreds anyway).—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">July 20, 2023</span>; 14:03 (UTC) 14:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

== Translation check please ==

Hello, I'm working my way through ] to check that the referencing is suitable for all the people on the list. For a Russian rapper, ], there is the following link - https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/445803-oksimiron-vypustil-mikstejp-so-starymi-trekami-smutnoe-vrema-vmesto-novogo-al-boma Google translate says there's nothing in that article about bipolar disorder but I know not to trust Google translate so I was wondering if anyone in your project would have the time to confirm whether the link says anything about bipolar? ] (]) 23:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


See ]: rename to ]. --] ] 18:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
:It doesn't but Oxxxymiron did say he suffers from it . I don't know if it's enough for the inclusion in the list. ]<sub>]</sub> 06:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
::Thank you for checking. I think what I'll do is replace the reference with the other one, and stick a better reference needed template next to it. Thank you again. ] (]) 23:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Requested merge at ] ==


] has created ] if anyone is interested in reviewing the article and providing feedback. ] (]) 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
]
An editor has requested a merge at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 21:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
== ] rewrite ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran ] 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
I have rewritten the article based on the information already present in said article, as such I need someone proficient in Russian to ensure that my rewrite is at least comparable to the source texts. If possible, also verify that said sources are reliable (some websites are only archived) and replace/remove those sources which are not.
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)


== Deletion review of Anti-Russian violence in Chechnya (1991–1994) ==
Thank you/Спасибо! <span style="background-color: #87CEEB; color:white">]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFB6C1">]</span></sup> 14:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


You may want to weigh in ]. ]<sub>]</sub> 07:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
== Another discussion at ] ==


== Discussion invite: length of Joseph Stalin article ==
The matter of the {{tlx|globalize}} tag in the ] article is discussed. More inputs are welcome there. Link: ] ] (]) 22:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)


Editors are invited to give comments on the legnth of the article ]. The discussion can be found at ]. ] (]) 17:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
== POV at ] ==


== Requested move at ] ==
This article reads like a (bad) translation of a Kremlin press release. I'm not very competent in this area, so I bring it here that knowledgeable editors can have a look. Thanks! --] (]) 14:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 06:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
:Indeed, there are sentences like {{tq|The second summit Russia-Africa is being challenging and critical one for Russia after several rounds of unilateral sanctions, multipolarity world, and new hegemony for equal treated partners happen rooted by west counterparts to support Russo-Ukrainian war since February 2022 ago. This summit has been received any challenges and obstacles doubled by several occasion provoked and insults by western countries, especially pressure towards the leaders of most African nations to reduce, anticipated, or ignored to attend this summit, especially from former western colonizer in African continent to ensure their grips in Africa, like US, UK, Finland, dan France.}} I'm also not going to be able to do much here, but someone certainly should at the least clean up the English. I'm not even entirely sure what those sentences are supposed to mean.--] (]) 15:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
::I toned it down a bit, pls free to copyedit. Since the summit will apparently continue, more POV edits could be introduced, but I added the article to my watchlist. ] (]) 15:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)


== A Class promotion for ] ==
== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (] • ]) 14:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


According to ], when there is not a formal process to assess A class, it requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors without significant opposes. This is to let you know know that I have started a discussion for whether to upgrade the ] to A. I hope to hear feedback. Thanks, ] (]) 01:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
==Maps to include in infobox of Russia==
There is a discussion at ] about the inclusion of several maps in the infobox. Your input in the discussion is appreciated. Regards,--<span style="border-radius:8em;padding:0 7px;background:orange">]</span> ] 02:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== The picture ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
] That's sort of odd there's no heraldic stuff or coat of arms (e.g. the two-headed bird) is used for "WikiProject RUSSIA" logo, unlike many other "WikiProject ''x''" logos. ] (]) 13:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
:If you want to try your hand at designing a new, better logo, by all means go for it :) Cheers,—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">August 1, 2023</span>; 16:05 (UTC) 16:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Russian Empire subdivisions' translations ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


== Proposing the ] with source issues ==
{{bcc|Mzajac}}{{bcc|WikiEditor1234567123}}{{bcc|Samiollah1357}}<!--Pinging you as I've noticed your interest in such articles and their translations-->For the subdivisions of the ], I suggest using an <nowiki>{{efn}}</nowiki> note for multiple translations; or if there's only a Russian translation, to put it simply in parenthesis. In regards to the Russian translation itself, since the subdivisions would be mentioned in Russian literature and texts printed prior to the ], we should include the pre-reform orthography alongside the modern Russian translation in the note, but use modern Russian everywhere else in the article including in the infobox. For example, here are the ]'s translations which contain a Russian and Belarusian translation inside an <nowiki>{{efn}}</nowiki> note:


Hi everyone, I would like to submit ] about a historical place linked to the Tsar Nicholas II and its family, especially in the years of WWI: it is the place where an hospital was organized and where the empress Alexandra and its 4 daughters were employed as Red Cross nurses for two and half years, until the February 1917 revolution.
'''Code:'''
We have plenty of photos of them and I already inserted also a gallery, selecting for now the most representative ones... but the problem relies on the sources and references: at the moment I inserted some sources, mainly divided into two types:
:<nowiki>{{efn|{{bulletedlist|{{lang-ru|Брестский уезд}}, {{lang-ru|label=<small>]</small>|Брестскій уѣздъ}}|{{lang-be|Брэсцкі павет}}}}}}</nowiki>
*some of institutional catalogs of important places in russia, to certify that this place really exists (with already some introductory text to it);
'''Appears in the note as:'''
*one from an important blog about the Romanov and related things, with some articles to certify many details about it: this is an important blog, with even a second domain name. It is a trusted sources among us Romanov lovers.
:{{bulletedlist|{{lang-ru|Брестский уезд}}, {{lang-ru|label=<small>]</small>|Брестскій уѣздъ}}|{{lang-be|Брэсцкі павет}}}}
The reviewer @] said that he cannot verify if the sources are reliable or not, not knowing the russian language. Someone here from the project may know it and verify these sources, so that I can put some inline link and ultimately re-send the draft for review?
However, where the modern and pre-reform Russian spellings are identical, there shant be a need to add the latter template – for example, see the translation in ]. Also, needless to say, the Russian romanisation should be done in accordance with ] (redundant if the article title is the romanised Russian translation). Moreover, there is a ] against using stress marks, at least in this niche area. Let me know if you have any thoughts/suggestions. Best, – ] ''<sup><span style="font-size:75%">]</span></sup>'' 08:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks a lot to everyone listening. :) -- ] (]) 15:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)


:@], the blog you're using is a self-published source. It's maintained by certain Paul Gilbert. Assuming is true, you can probably make an argument that he's an expert and therefore it's an admissible source per ].
:I am fine with this, and I do not think the stress marks are needed, though users would add them anyway. ] (]) 08:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:However, I'd suggest using sources that would leave no room for doubt. It's likely that it will take less time than arguing about the merits of the blog. Searching for Фёдоровский Городок on Google Books produces several results that seem pertinent (Двор российских императоров. Энциклопедия жизни и быта, Взрослый мир императорских резиденций - both by Igor Zimin and Ратная палата. Исторический очерк). ]<sub>]</sub> 21:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
::{{u|Ymblanter}}, I vaguely recall some weeks ago stumbling upon a discussion wherein users were trying to form a consensus against using stress marks / pronunciation diacritics for Russian translations, are you aware of it? Best, – ] ''<sup><span style="font-size:75%">]</span></sup>'' 12:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:::Yes, I remember about as much, and I think there was no consensus, but I do not remember where it was. ]? ] (]) 12:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
::::]: the outcome of the RfC was "there is a discernible consensus to generally omit stress marks" and " re-iterates existing policies like ] and ]. This discussion establishes that stress marks in Cyrillic should be used in accordance with those policies, that is, only where the best-quality English language sources demonstrate that their use is generally accepted as a best practice." I haven't seen any sources using stress marks for the uezd translations so I don't see why they should be included in this case. – ] ''<sup><span style="font-size:75%">]</span></sup>'' 12:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:::::I agree with you, my point is that users who are unaware of this consensus (and some would not even care about consensus) would add stress marks, and a few people who try top impose consensus would have to watch all these articles. ] (]) 12:50, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:::::Olympian, thank you for pointing out that RfC; I totally missed, having been on an extended wikibreak and all. I do think much of the reasoning in support of the removal of stress marks, at least from the Russian translation of the article's title, was based on a rather silly premise (''stress marks in Cyrillic should be used... only where the best-quality English language sources demonstrate that their use is generally accepted as a best practice'', seriously? Is there ''one'' English-language source in existence, outside of the realm of language study, where this is the case?) Plus, anyone trying to learn how to read Cyrillic will learn about stress marks pretty much on that same day, but pretending that everyone can parse IPA or learn it in a jiffy is a rather bold assumption. I'd be all for revisiting this; the RfC made some valid points, but the overall outcome is just too drastic.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">August 3, 2023</span>; 19:03 (UTC) 19:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:That looks pretty good.
:Should we not list the appropriate languages in alphabetical order? Belarusian-Estonian-Kazakh-Russian-Ukrainian-Uzbek, etcetera.
:Should the use of efn be mandated? Why not normally list one or two languages in the lead, as is usual, and only bury the additional obsolete spelling in a note? Obviously there may be exceptions where an article has a “Name” section, too. &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 14:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
::I'd be OK with using alpha order all else being equal. But Russian should come first simply because the units being discussed were a part of the Russian Empire, and the local language(s) should come next (except, obviously, for cases where a unit has been inherited from the Russian Empire but continued to exist in the successor entity). Everything else that's relevant for other reasons can be alphabetical no problem.
::Pre-reform spelling should definitely be included (if only because so many good sources are pre-1917). If having it in the lede is too visually straining, it can always be made into a footnote annotating the modern spelling; I have no problem with that.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">August 3, 2023</span>; 19:03 (UTC) 19:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:::The national languages should come first, simply because the Russian empire was a foreign empire. &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 05:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
::::Russian should come first simply because it was the language that was forced upon national populations and, as a result, the language in which the majority of the sources will be in. Putting national languages first, albeit a minor decision, is a step towards whitewashing history. You can't have it both ways!—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">August 4, 2023</span>; 13:44 (UTC) 13:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
::::(And just to clarify, I'm talking strictly about the Russian Empire here; not about the modern occupied regions. With those, putting Russian first only makes sense if a separate article about the occupied territory exists).—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">August 4, 2023</span>; 13:47 (UTC) 13:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
::Thanks for your thoughts. I definitely think the <nowiki>{{efn}}</nowiki> template is useful for listing multiple translations without cluttering the lead, it's done well in ], for example. In regards to the order of translations, I think the official (Russian) translation first should come first followed by the translations of prevalent linguistic groups. Exceptions can be made for more detailed such articles with "Name" sections, though this is unlikely to be the case for the majority of these articles. – ] ''<sup><span style="font-size:75%">]</span></sup>'' 22:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
:::“Prevalent linguistic groups” sounds like some kind of infection. They’re actually the nations.
:::”official (Russian) translation” — what? &nbsp;—'']&nbsp;].'' 05:45, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
::::I think (and correct me if I'm wrong), Olympian means the official Russian name of the administrative unit. The one which is romanized (and used as the title) in absence of an established common English name. Which is another good argument for putting Russian first&mdash;romanizing the name in the national language would make no sense, because no matter how obscure the romanized Russian name might be, the variant based on the local language is going to be even less common.—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); <span class="nowrap">August 4, 2023</span>; 13:52 (UTC) 13:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:32, 6 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Russia and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconRussia
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
WikiProject Russia was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 12 December 2011.
WikiProject Russia was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 12 February 2014.

To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Russia: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2014-01-18

Things you can do Привет and Welcome! The following is a list of things you can do:

Russia articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA Other ??? Total
FA 9 17 29 32 1 88
FL 2 4 6 2 14
FM 96 96
A 2 3 12 12 29
GA 27 39 117 226 3 412
B 221 295 523 765 1 21 250 2,076
C 362 634 1,293 3,005 4 26 826 6,150
Start 435 1,526 6,439 14,594 9 46 2,521 25,570
Stub 12 229 4,101 45,157 56 34 3,608 53,197
List 70 95 436 3,289 37 5 248 4,180
Category 21,486 21,486
Disambig 250 250
File 473 473
Portal 26 26
Project 126 126
Redirect 1 523 1,936 114 2,574
Template 4,386 4,386
NA 14 14
Other 120 120
Assessed 1,140 2,842 12,957 67,605 29,020 246 7,457 121,267
Unassessed 370 4 20 1,346 1,740
Total 1,140 2,842 12,957 67,975 29,024 266 8,803 123,007
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 478,425 Ω = 5.47

Page move request

See Talk:Folklore of Russia: rename to Russian folklore. --Altenmann >talk 18:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Succession, continuity and legacy of the Soviet Union

RuASG has created Succession, continuity and legacy of the Soviet Union if anyone is interested in reviewing the article and providing feedback. Mellk (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Mezhdunarodnaya (Moscow Metro)#Requested move 28 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Mezhdunarodnaya (Moscow Metro)#Requested move 28 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review of Anti-Russian violence in Chechnya (1991–1994)

You may want to weigh in here. Alaexis¿question? 07:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Discussion invite: length of Joseph Stalin article

Editors are invited to give comments on the legnth of the article Joseph Stalin. The discussion can be found at on the article's talk page. Z1720 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:RSM-56 Bulava#Requested move 3 November 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:RSM-56 Bulava#Requested move 3 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Frostly (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

A Class promotion for 1995 Neftegorsk earthquake

According to WP:A?, when there is not a formal process to assess A class, it requires the support of at least two uninvolved editors without significant opposes. This is to let you know know that I have started a discussion for whether to upgrade the 1995 Neftegorsk earthquake to A. I hope to hear feedback. Thanks, SamBroGaming (talk) 01:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Eurasian Economic Union

Eurasian Economic Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Lake Vostok

Lake Vostok has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Proposing the Draft:Feodorovsky Gorodok with source issues

Hi everyone, I would like to submit this draft about a historical place linked to the Tsar Nicholas II and its family, especially in the years of WWI: it is the place where an hospital was organized and where the empress Alexandra and its 4 daughters were employed as Red Cross nurses for two and half years, until the February 1917 revolution. We have plenty of photos of them and I already inserted also a gallery, selecting for now the most representative ones... but the problem relies on the sources and references: at the moment I inserted some sources, mainly divided into two types:

  • some of institutional catalogs of important places in russia, to certify that this place really exists (with already some introductory text to it);
  • one from an important blog about the Romanov and related things, with some articles to certify many details about it: this is an important blog, with even a second domain name. It is a trusted sources among us Romanov lovers.

The reviewer @Lemonaka said that he cannot verify if the sources are reliable or not, not knowing the russian language. Someone here from the project may know it and verify these sources, so that I can put some inline link and ultimately re-send the draft for review? Thanks a lot to everyone listening. :) -- LucaLindholm (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

@LucaLindholm, the blog you're using is a self-published source. It's maintained by certain Paul Gilbert. Assuming this is true, you can probably make an argument that he's an expert and therefore it's an admissible source per WP:SELFPUBLISHED.
However, I'd suggest using sources that would leave no room for doubt. It's likely that it will take less time than arguing about the merits of the blog. Searching for Фёдоровский Городок on Google Books produces several results that seem pertinent (Двор российских императоров. Энциклопедия жизни и быта, Взрослый мир императорских резиденций - both by Igor Zimin and Ратная палата. Исторический очерк). Alaexis¿question? 21:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: