Misplaced Pages

User talk:Migsmigss: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:54, 23 August 2023 editMigsmigss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,950 edits Hounding?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:39, 27 August 2023 edit undoNil Einne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers73,105 edits Block notice versus declined unblock requests: ReplyTag: Reply 
(32 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Let's Talk== == August 2023 ==
{{unblock reviewed |1=An indefinite block for an unproven accusation of hounding? The other editor who engaged in edit warring and article ownership didn't get anything? Sorry, but this is abuse of power by ]. Can some other admins check this please? I request an accountability check on admin ]. Thanks. ] (]) 12:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |decline = This unblock request does not address the reason for your block, which is harassment. Reading through the ANI thread, I too conclude that you have been attempting to harass KyleJoan. You are going to have to do some self-reflection and come up with a more convincing unblock request which addresses your own conduct. ]] 12:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)}}
]


{{unblock reviewed |1=Based on the responses of two uninvolved admins, yes, I acknowledge my mistake, and extend my apologies. I am sorry. I promise not to engage in hounding or any other form of harassment. I am willing to accept a block for a time, all I'm asking is for my block not to be indefinite. Thank you.] (]) 12:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |decline = That's a sudden turnaround from attacking the blocking administrator. An indefinite block is not infinite, and you can request an unblock in time via the ]. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 12:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)}}
<div style="display: table; border: 0.5px solid #aaaaaa; border-radius: 0px; background-color: #79FFB8; padding: 10px;">'''Welcome to my Talk page!
<br>'''Looking forward to working with you in creating, maintaining, and developing Wiki articles, pages, and media! Let's foster an ], ], and ] environment here, where seasoned editors engage in a ] in enriching both the quantity and quality of Misplaced Pages content, while also ].
<br>
<br>'''If you have any topic or issue you wish to discuss with me, you're welcome to create a new section down below. Let's discuss with ]—as all human beings should.
<br>
<br>'''Cheers!
<br>'''] 12:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)'''</div>


== Block notice versus declined unblock requests ==
==Migsmigss, you are invited to the Teahouse!==


Hey - what I said in response to Nil Einne was that the block notice may be removed - it has been. What policy requires is that declined unblock requests be kept here. Hope everything is clear now; please don't remove them again. You're welcome to remove this message when the protection expires (but not the notices above). ]] 07:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

:The specific policy involved is ], which states "A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes: Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active sitewide block.". ] (]) 09:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
::I tried to be clear in my response but Migsmiggs, you've misunderstood what I was saying if you think I was saying you were allowed to remove the declined unblock requests. You're not as long as you are blocked. What I was trying to say is you could remove the notice you received about being blocked, but you had to keep the requests you made to be unblocked which had been declined. Basically you need to keep your talk page as it is now except you can also remove all the comments here under "Block notice versus declined unblock requests". Again you have to keep the declined unblocked requests which are currently under the subject heading August 2023. ] (]) 11:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
|- valign="top"
| ]
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Migsmigss'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Worm That Turned}} (]).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the ]</small>

<small>20:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->

== Overlinking ==

Please actually read ]. It is not always about the ''amount'' of links.

"Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked:

*Everyday words understood by most readers in context.
*The names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar:
**This generally includes major examples of: geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America), '''locations (e.g., Berlin; New York City, or just New York if the city context is already clear; London, if the context rules out London, Ontario; Japan, Brazil, Southeast Asia)''', languages (e.g., English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish), nationalities and ethnicities (e.g., English, British, Chinese, Turkish, African-American, Hispanic), and religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism)
*Common occupations
*Common units of measurement, e.g. units relating to currency, time, temperature, length, area, or volume. If both non-metric and metric equivalents are provided, as in 5 centimetres (2.0 in), usually neither unit needs to be linked, because almost all readers will understand at least one of the units.
*Dates (see § Chronological items, below)"
Countries generally should not be linked. ] }</b>]] 03:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

:"Should?" We are observing best practices and guidelines, not hard and fast rules. If it is helpful in the overall development of an article, then it must be accommodated. If it helps the content, then it is preferred, as it adheres to the principles of Misplaced Pages, rather than limiting an article. Thanks.

] (]) 18:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

== help me in the page ] ==
the page is gone to speedy deletion and i don't know do anything extra,, please helpp!! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Hello. I'm traveling right now and won't be able to do the nitty-gritty on why the article got deleted. If you're planning to create a new one, please make sure all sources and references are acceptable and verifiable, and all information included in said article are provided and supplemented with the right sources/references. Hoping you successfully publish an article this time. Will help in copyediting and then some, once I find the time.

Cheers.

] (]) 07:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

@]. I see you've restarted work on this page. Keep it up! To improve the quality of the article and avoid it getting deleted, include sufficient and verifiable information on the topic/subject, and also back all edits with reliable sources and references. Will visit the article as soon as I can, and hopefully help improve it. I'm still traveling now, but will try to help as soon as I can. All the best!

] (]) 17:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your time.--] (]) 17:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=990308533 -->

== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1056563443 -->

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1124425186 -->

== ]? ==

How long have you been interested in contributing to {{pagelinks|Paul Mescal}} and {{pagelinks|Taron Egerton}}? Is it merely a wild coincidence that you began editing the two, both of which are in my 50 most recent contributions, after our interaction on {{pagelinks|Staz Nair}}? ]<sup>]</sup> 08:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Excuse me? I don't need to explain anything to you. You do not own Misplaced Pages, nor those articles.
:So you ''didn't'' review ]? Part of communication is answering questions, you know? ]<sup>]</sup> 08:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
:: How condescending. "Part of communication is answering questions, you know?"—Not when the process is self-incriminating. You accuse me of hounding, and then you ask questions for me to explain your accusation? (If you really wanted answers for your questions, they are readily available in my edit summary, which is accessible to anyone. But you already know that.) How laughable. How condescending.] (]) 10:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:39, 27 August 2023

August 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Migsmigss (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

An indefinite block for an unproven accusation of hounding? The other editor who engaged in edit warring and article ownership didn't get anything? Sorry, but this is abuse of power by ~ ToBeFree. Can some other admins check this please? I request an accountability check on admin ~ ToBeFree. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not address the reason for your block, which is harassment. Reading through the ANI thread, I too conclude that you have been attempting to harass KyleJoan. You are going to have to do some self-reflection and come up with a more convincing unblock request which addresses your own conduct. Girth Summit (blether) 12:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Migsmigss (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Based on the responses of two uninvolved admins, yes, I acknowledge my mistake, and extend my apologies. I am sorry. I promise not to engage in hounding or any other form of harassment. I am willing to accept a block for a time, all I'm asking is for my block not to be indefinite. Thank you.Migsmigss (talk) 12:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's a sudden turnaround from attacking the blocking administrator. An indefinite block is not infinite, and you can request an unblock in time via the standard offer. Acroterion (talk) 12:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block notice versus declined unblock requests

Hey - what I said in response to Nil Einne was that the block notice may be removed - it has been. What policy requires is that declined unblock requests be kept here. Hope everything is clear now; please don't remove them again. You're welcome to remove this message when the protection expires (but not the notices above). Girth Summit (blether) 07:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The specific policy involved is WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK, which states "A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes: Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active sitewide block.". 331dot (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
I tried to be clear in my response but Migsmiggs, you've misunderstood what I was saying if you think I was saying you were allowed to remove the declined unblock requests. You're not as long as you are blocked. What I was trying to say is you could remove the notice you received about being blocked, but you had to keep the requests you made to be unblocked which had been declined. Basically you need to keep your talk page as it is now except you can also remove all the comments here under "Block notice versus declined unblock requests". Again you have to keep the declined unblocked requests which are currently under the subject heading August 2023. Nil Einne (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)