Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rebroad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:59, 24 March 2007 editThuranX (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers20,147 edits i do mind← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:23, 8 October 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,272 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Rebroad/Archive 2023) (botTag: Manual revert 
(566 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
'''Welcome!'''
|minthreadsleft = 0

|minthreadstoarchive = 1
THIS IS MY USER TALK. IF YOU VANDALIZE IT, I WILL REVERT THE VANDALISM. AS MANY TIMES AS IT TAKES. HITTING MY TALK WITH 'CEASE AND DESIST' VANDALISM WARNINGS FOR UNDOING YOUR BAD INFO, OR YOUR OWN VANDALISM, WILL ALSO BE REVERTED.
|algo = old(45d)

|archive = User talk:Rebroad/Archive %(year)d
NEW COMMENTS GO AT THE BOTTOM.
}}

<div class="usermessage"><div class="plainlinks">Please leave a '''.'''</div></div>

Old stuff moved to ] --] 17:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

== You recent edits, and your AN/I ==

I have looked over your comment, and the pages in question. I responded at AN/I, and would appreciate you looking in on things. I also notice that durign this process, you've elected to archive your entire talk. While it's your right to archive regularly, I would suggest that in the future, you NOT move entire conversations between you and an editor who you're bringing to AN/I. It looks like you're trying to hide something. As I said a couple hours ago on AN/I, it looks like she's right about things. please return to AN/I for more discussions. ] 17:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

:No, the purpose of replacing them is so that during an ongoing problem, OTHER editors can see what the history of the dispute was, without digging through page's history, switching to the archive, then running through a long set of diffs, as you have made me, and no doubt, others do. What you did was NOT what my user talk note refers to. Look through my history. I've deleted recently, in fact, some hostile commentary from editors who can't AGF and work on a problem. My actual warnings and such are pretty much intact. My archives still hold such things, including my blocks. I remove stuff that goes like 'screw you, i'm smart and your wrong so go away and dont come here', not 3rr warning templates and such. Your removal of such obfuscates the situation. As I said above, doing such makes you look combative, resistant to being warned, and probably guilty of whatever the warning was about. Try to avoid it. ] 17:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

::And since you thoroughly misunderstand the warning, I DO in fact mind your copying it. ] 17:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:23, 8 October 2023

Please leave a new message.