Misplaced Pages

List of gospels: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:52, 26 September 2023 edit2601:2c5:c380:89a0:c5fc:f675:68d8:bc31 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:44, 8 January 2025 edit undoThomasKross (talk | contribs)20 edits Add internal linkTags: Visual edit Newcomer task Newcomer task: copyedit 
(51 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
]s]] ]s]]


A ] (a contraction of ] {{lang|ang|god spel}}, meaning "good news/glad tidings", comparable to ] {{lang|grc|εὐαγγέλιον}}, {{transliteration|grc|evangelion}}){{sfn|Woodhead|2004|p=4}} is a written account of the career and teachings of ].{{sfn|Tuckett|2000|p=522}} The term originally meant the Christian message itself, but came to be used for the books in which the message was set out{{sfn|Cross|Livingstone|2005|p=697}} in the 2nd century. ] (]: εὐαγγέλιον; ]: ''evangelium'') are written records detailing the life and teachings of ].{{sfn|Tuckett|2000|p=522}} The term originally referred to the ] message itself but later came to refer to the books in which the message was written. {{sfn|Cross|Livingstone|2005|p=697}}


Gospels are a ] of ] literature that recount the life of Jesus. The ] has four ], which are accepted as the only authentic scripture by the great majority of Christians, but many others exist, or used to exist, and are called either ] or ]a. Some of these have left considerable traces on ] traditions, including ]. Gospels are a ] of ] in ] literature. The ] includes four ], but there are many gospels not included in the biblical canon. <ref>{{Cite web |title=The Story Of The Storytellers - What Are The Gospels? {{!}} From Jesus To Christ {{!}} FRONTLINE {{!}} PBS |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/story/gospels.html |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=www.pbs.org}}</ref> These additional gospels are referred to as either ] or ]. Some of these texts have impacted ] traditions, including many forms of ].


==Canonical gospels== ==Canonical gospels==
Line 14: Line 14:
** ] ** ]
** ] ** ]
⚫ ** ]
* ] (see also the ]) * ] (see also the ])
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]


===Hypothesized sources of the synoptic gospels=== ===Hypothesized sources of the synoptic gospels===
{{Main|Two-source hypothesis|Four-document hypothesis}} {{Main|Two-source hypothesis|Four-document hypothesis}}
* ] – '''Q''' is material common to Matthew and Luke, but not found in Mark * ] – '''Q''' is a material common to Matthew and Luke, but not found in Mark
* ] – '''M''' is material unique to Matthew * ] – '''M''' is a material unique to Matthew
* ] – '''L''' is material unique to Luke * ] – '''L''' is a material unique to Luke


===Hypothesized sources of the Gospel of John=== ===Hypothesized sources of the Gospel of John===
Line 30: Line 30:
==Apocrypha and pseudepigrapha== ==Apocrypha and pseudepigrapha==
{{Main|Apocrypha|Pseudepigrapha}} {{Main|Apocrypha|Pseudepigrapha}}

=== Closely related to the Canonical Gospels ===

* ] – 2nd century, closely related to the Gospel of Luke with modifications to suit ].

===Gnostic gospels=== ===Gnostic gospels===
{{Main|Gnostic Gospels}} {{Main|Gnostic Gospels}}
* ] – The Gospel of Thomas (also known as the Coptic Gospel of Thomas) is a non-canonical sayings gospel. * ] – The Gospel of Thomas (also known as the Coptic Gospel of Thomas) is a non-canonical sayings gospel.<ref name=":0" />
* ] – 2nd century, potentially an edited version of the Gospel of Luke (see: ]) * ] – composed in Egypt around 120-140 AD, thought to be a Gnostic ] of the canonical gospels.<ref name=":0" />
* ] (]) – mid-2nd century, departed from earlier Gnostic works by admitting and defending the physicality of Christ and his resurrection.
* ] – composed in Egypt around 120 to 140 AD, thought to be a Gnostic ] of the canonical gospels
* ] (]) – mid-2nd century, departed from earlier Gnostic works by admitting and defending the physicality of Christ and his resurrection * ] – mid-2nd century, thought to be a Gnostic cosmology, most likely in the form of a dialogue between Jesus and his disciples.
* ] – mid-2nd century, thought to be a Gnostic cosmology, most likely in the form of a dialogue between Jesus and his disciples * ] – 2nd century Gnostic text.
* ] – 2nd century Gnostic text * ] – 2nd century, documents Gnostic teachings in the form of a dialogue between Jesus and Judas.
* ] – 2nd century Gnostic text * ] – second quarter of the 2nd century.<ref name=":0" />
* ] – second quarter of the 2nd century * ] – 3rd-century non-canonical sayings gospel.
* ] – 3rd-century Gnostic text
* ] – a ] gospel titled the Gospel of the Twelve, this work is shorter than the regular gospels and seems to be different from the lost Gospel of the Twelve.<ref>Harris, J. R., ed. ''The Gospel of the Twelve Apostles Together with the Apocalypses of Each One of Them'' (Cambridge, 1900).</ref> * ] – a ] gospel titled the Gospel of the Twelve, this work is shorter than the regular gospels and seems to be different from the lost Gospel of the Twelve.<ref>Harris, J. R., ed. ''The Gospel of the Twelve Apostles Together with the Apocalypses of Each One of Them'' (Cambridge, 1900).</ref>
* ] – 4th century, an ] poem that is only mentioned once by a single ] source, ],<ref>Pan. Hæres. 26. § 2</ref> and is referred to once in the 6th century ] * ] – 4th century, an ] poem that is only mentioned once by a single ] source, ],<ref>Pan. Hæres. 26. § 2</ref> and is referred to once in the 6th century ].
* ] – also called Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit * ] – also called Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit.


===Jewish-Christian gospels=== ===Jewish-Christian gospels===
{{Main|Jewish-Christian gospels}} {{Main|Jewish-Christian gospels}}
* ] * ] – consisting of seven citations by Epiphanius, GE-1 to GE-7.
* ] * ] – consisting of citations and marginal notes by Jerome and others (GN-1 to GN-36).
* ] * ] – a fragmented ] of the ], modified to reflect the theology of the writer.
* ] * ] – a lost gospel mentioned by ] as part of a list of heretical works.<ref name=":0" />


===Infancy gospels=== ===Infancy gospels===
* ]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=Robert |author1-link=R. McL. Wilson |editor1-last=Tenney |editor1-first=Merrill |editor1-link=Merrill C. Tenney |title=The Zondervan pictorial encyclopedia of the Bible |date=1975 |publisher=Zondervan Publishing House |location=Grand Rapids, MI |isbn=0310331889 |page=311 |url=https://archive.org/details/zondervanpictori0000unse/page/310/mode/2up |access-date=13 February 2023 |language=English |quote=A late and secondary compilation, ultimately dependent on the Protevangelium of James and the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, but greatly amplified. It derives from a Syr. original, but the date of this source is doubtful.}} * ]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=Robert |author1-link=R. McL. Wilson |editor1-last=Tenney |editor1-first=Merrill |editor1-link=Merrill C. Tenney |title=The Zondervan pictorial encyclopedia of the Bible |date=1975 |publisher=Zondervan Publishing House |location=Grand Rapids, MI |isbn=0310331889 |page=311 |url=https://archive.org/details/zondervanpictori0000unse/page/310/mode/2up |access-date=13 February 2023 |language=en |quote=A late and secondary compilation, ultimately dependent on the Protevangelium of James and the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, but greatly amplified. It derives from a Syr. original, but the date of this source is doubtful.}}
<br/><br/> <br/><br/>
Also available on (which )</ref> Also available on (which )</ref>
Line 61: Line 65:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* Latin Infancy Gospel (also known as the "J Composition")<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ehrman |first1=Bart |last2=Pleše |first2=Zlatko |editor1-last=Ehrman |editor1-first=Bart |editor1-link=Bart D. Ehrman |title=The Other Gospels: Accounts of Jesus from Outside the New Testament |date=December 18, 2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=USA |isbn=9780199335220 |pages=58-77 |quote=The Latin Infancy Gospel ... is a later account of the births and early lives of Mary and Jesus}}</ref> * Latin Infancy Gospel (also known as the "J Composition")<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ehrman |first1=Bart |last2=Pleše |first2=Zlatko |editor1-last=Ehrman |editor1-first=Bart |editor1-link=Bart D. Ehrman |title=The Other Gospels: Accounts of Jesus from Outside the New Testament |date=December 18, 2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=USA |isbn=9780199335220 |pages=58–77 |quote=The Latin Infancy Gospel ... is a later account of the births and early lives of Mary and Jesus}}</ref>
* ] * ]


Line 73: Line 77:
Fragmentary gospels are those preserved from ]. Fragmentary gospels are those preserved from ].


* ] – mentioned only once by ] around 400 AD, who preserves a single brief passage in quotation * ] – mentioned only once by ] around 400 AD, who preserves a single brief passage in quotation.
* ] – 3rd century – attributed to the Persian ], the founder of ] * ] – 3rd century – attributed to the Persian ], the founder of ].
* ] (also known as the Unknown Berlin gospel) – highly fragmentary 6th century manuscript based on a late 2nd or early 3rd century original, a dialogue rather than a narrative, heavily Gnostic in character in that salvation is dependent upon possessing secret knowledge * ] (also known as the Unknown Berlin gospel) – highly fragmentary 6th century manuscript based on a late 2nd or early 3rd century original, a dialogue rather than a narrative, heavily Gnostic in character in that salvation is dependent upon possessing secret knowledge.
* Coptic Gospel of the Twelve – late 2nd century ] work – although often equated with the Gospel of the Ebionites, it appears to be an attempt to retell the Gospel of John in the pattern of the Synoptics; it quotes extensively from the Gospel of John. * Coptic Gospel of the Twelve – late 2nd century ] work – although often equated with the Gospel of the Ebionites, it appears to be an attempt at retelling the Gospel of John in the pattern of the Synoptics; it quotes extensively from the Gospel of John.{{Citation needed|reason=Possibly conflating different sources|date=September 2024}}


===Reconstructed gospels=== ===Reconstructed gospels===
Reconstructed gospels are those preserved from ] and ]. Reconstructed gospels are those preserved from ] and ].


* ] – suspect: the single source mentioning it is considered by many to be a modern forgery, and it was lost before it could be independently authenticated. * ] – legitimacy is a subject of debate as the single source mentioning it is considered by many to be a modern forgery, and was lost before it could be independently authenticated.
* ] – a lost text from the New Testament apocrypha. The content has been surmised from descriptions in works by church fathers. * ] – a lost text from the New Testament apocrypha. The content has been surmised from descriptions in works by church fathers.<ref name=":0" />


===Lost gospels=== ===Lost gospels===
* ] – around 90–120 AD – according to Epiphanius,<ref>Pan. Haer. 28.5.1., I 317.10</ref> this is a Jewish gospel identical to the Gospel of the Ebionites, and apparently, a truncated version of the Gospel of Matthew according to the Hebrews. * ] – around 90-120 AD according to Epiphanius,<ref>Pan. Haer. 28.5.1., I 317.10</ref> this is a Jewish gospel identical to the Gospel of the Ebionites, and apparently a truncated version of the Gospel of Matthew, according to the Hebrews.
* Gospel of ] – mid- to late 2nd century, a further edited version of Marcion's edited version of Luke * Gospel of ] – mid to late 2nd century, a further edited version of Marcion's edited version of Luke.
* Gospel of ]{{efn|Mentioned by ] in Adversus Valentinianos, according to ], it is the same as the ]}} * Gospel of ]{{efn|Mentioned by ] in Adversus Valentinianos, according to ], it is the same as the ]}}
* Gospel of the ]{{efn|] ascribed a gospel to the sect of ]. It is more probable however, that he referred to the Gospel of ]}} * Gospel of the ]{{efn|] ascribed a gospel to the sect of ]. It is more probable however, that he referred to the Gospel of ]}}
* ] – mentioned by only two 5th century sources (] and ]) who list it as apocryphal{{efn|Augustine and Innocent only mentioned it once with no information about it. If it is the same as the Acts of Andrew, then it was written around 150–250 AD and is not lost, and is kind of a Christian retelling of the Odyssey, only with St. Andrew in the lead role.}} * ] – mentioned by only two 5th century sources (] and ]) who list it as apocryphal.{{efn|Augustine and Innocent only mentioned it once with no information about it. If it is the same as the Acts of Andrew, then it was written around 150–250 AD and is not lost, and is kind of a Christian retelling of the Odyssey, only with St. Andrew in the lead role.}}
* ] – mentioned by only two 5th century sources, ]<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Jerome |first=St. |author-link=Jerome |url=https://archive.org/details/commentary-on-matthew-st-jerome |title=St. Jerome: Commentary on Matthew. |date=2008 |publisher=The Catholic University of America Press |year=2008 |location=New York |publication-date=2008 |pages=51-52 |language=en |translator-last=Scheck |translator-first=Thomas |trans-title=}}</ref> and ] which both list it as apocryphal.{{efn|] mentions it also in Catul. Script. Eccles. in Pantæn. {{expand abbreviation|date=July 2022}}}}
*] – this work is mentioned only once, in the 5th century ], which lists it as apocryphal.
* ] – mentioned by only two 5th century sources, which list it as apocryphal.{{efn|] mentions it twice: Catul. Script. Eccles. in Pantæn. and Præfat. in Comm. in Matt.{{expand abbreviation|date=July 2022}} It is also mentioned once in the Decree of Gelasius}} * Gospel of Hesychius – mentioned only by Jerome and the Decree of Gelasius, which both list it as apocryphal.{{efn|This phrase is found in the Decree of Gelasius wherein certain gospels are condemned by that title. What they were is uncertain. Jerome speaks of "those books which go under the names of Lucian and Hesychius and are esteemed through the perverse humors of some".}}
* Gospel of Hesychius – mentioned only by Jerome and the Decree of Gelasius that list it as apocryphal.{{efn|This phrase is found in the Decree of Gelasius wherein certain gospels are condemned by that title. What they were is uncertain. Jerome speaks of "those books which go under the names of Lucian and Hesychius and are esteemed through the perverse humors of some".}} * Gospel of Lucius – mentioned only by Jerome and the Decree of Gelasius, which list it as apocryphal.
⚫ * Gospel of Merinthus{{efn|The Gospel of Merinthus is mentioned only by ] as one of those spurious gospels which he supposes were written in the apostles' time and referred to by Luke in Luke 1:1 "as not being a true and genuine account". ] supposes that Merinthus and Cerinthus are the same person and that Cerinthus was changed into Merinthus by the way of banter or reproach. Although Epiphanius makes them into two different persons, yet in the heresy of the Cerinthians, he professes himself uncertain. He said "The Cerinthians are also called Merinthians as we see by the accounts we have; but whether this Cerinthus was also called Merinthus, a fellow laborer of his, God knows".<ref>Jones, ''A new and full method of settling the canonical authority of the New Testament''</ref>}} – mentioned only by Epiphanius; thought by most to be the Gospel of Cerinthus, with the confusion due to a scribal error.
* Gospel of Lucius – mentioned only by Jerome and the Decree of Gelasius that list it as apocryphal.
⚫ * Gospel of Merinthus{{efn|The Gospel of Merinthus is mentioned only by ] as one of those spurious gospels which he supposes were written in the apostles' time and referred to by Luke in Luke 1:1 "as not being a true and genuine account". ] supposes that Merinthus and Cerinthus are the same person and that Cerinthus was changed into Merinthus by the way of banter or reproach. Although Epiphanius makes them into two different persons, yet in the heresy of the Cerinthians, he professes himself uncertain. He said "The Cerinthians are also called Merinthians as we see by the accounts we have; but whether this Cerinthus was also called Merinthus, a fellow laborer of his, God knows".<ref>Jones, ''A new and full method of settling the canonical authority of the New Testament''</ref>}} – mentioned only by Epiphanius; probably the Gospel of Cerinthus, and the confusion due to a scribal error.
* An unknown number of other ] gospels not cited by name.{{efn|The ] had various gospels. ] speaks of their writing "The Revelation of Adam, and other false gospels".}} * An unknown number of other ] gospels not cited by name.{{efn|The ] had various gospels. ] speaks of their writing "The Revelation of Adam, and other false gospels".}}
* Gospel of the Adversary of the Law and the Prophets<ref>Augustine, ''Contra Adversarium Legis et Prophetarum'', 2.3.14.</ref> * Gospel of the Adversary of the Law and the Prophets.<ref>Augustine, ''Contra Adversarium Legis et Prophetarum'', 2.3.14.</ref>
* ] – lost narrative of the life of Jesus, mentioned by ], the passages quoted by Justin may have originated from a ] of the ] composed by Justin or his school. * ] – a lost narrative of the life of Jesus, mentioned by ]; the passages quoted by Justin may have originated from a ] of the ] composed by Justin or his school.


===Fragments of possibly unknown or lost (or existing) gospels=== ===Fragments of possibly unknown or lost (or existing) gospels===
Fragmentary gospels are those preserved from ]. Fragmentary gospels are those preserved from ].


* ] – late 2nd century manuscript of possibly earlier original; contents parallel John 5:39–47, 10:31–39; Matthew 1:40–45, 8:1–4, 22:15–22; Mark 1:40–45, 12:13–17; and Luke 5:12–16, 17:11–14, 20:20–26, but differ textually; also contains incomplete miracle account with no equivalent in canonical Gospels * ] – late 2nd century manuscript of a possibly earlier original; contents parallel John 5:39–47, 10:31–39; Matthew 1:40–45, 8:1–4, 22:15–22; Mark 1:40–45, 12:13–17; and Luke 5:12–16, 17:11–14, 20:20–26, but differ textually; also contains an incomplete miracle account which has no equivalent in the canonical Gospels.
* ] – a fragment of about 100 Greek letters in 3rd century script; the text seems to parallel Mark 14:26–31 * ] – a fragment of about 100 Greek letters in 3rd century script; the text seems to parallel Mark 14:26–31.
* ] – fragments #1, 654, and 655 appear to be fragments of Thomas; #210 is related to Matthew 7:17–19 and Luke 6:43–44 but not identical to them; #840 contains a short vignette about Jesus and a Pharisee not found in any known gospel, the source text is probably mid-2nd century; #1224 consists of paraphrases of Mark 2:17 and Luke 9:50 * ] – fragments #1, 654, and 655 appear to be fragments of Thomas; #210 is related to Matthew 7:17–19 and Luke 6:43–44 but not identical to them; #840 contains a short vignette about Jesus and a Pharisee not found in any known gospel, the source text is probably mid-2nd century; #1224 consists of paraphrases of Mark 2:17 and Luke 9:50.
* ] – modern forgery based on the Gospel of Thomas<ref name="GJW.sabar">{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/07/the-unbelievable-tale-of-jesus-wife/485573/|title=The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus's Wife|author=Ariel Sabar|access-date=June 18, 2016|work=]}}</ref><ref name=GJW.grondin>{{cite news|last=Bernhard|first=Andrew|title=How The Gospel of Jesus's Wife Might Have Been Forged|url=http://www.gospels.net/gjw/mighthavebeenforged.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305100316/http://www.gospels.net/gjw/mighthavebeenforged.pdf|publisher=gospels.net|date=October 11, 2012|archive-date=March 5, 2016|access-date=June 11, 2017}}</ref> * ] – modern forgery based on the Gospel of Thomas.<ref name="GJW.sabar">{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/07/the-unbelievable-tale-of-jesus-wife/485573/|title=The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus's Wife|author=Ariel Sabar|access-date=June 18, 2016|work=]}}</ref><ref name=GJW.grondin>{{cite news|last=Bernhard|first=Andrew|title=How The Gospel of Jesus's Wife Might Have Been Forged|url=http://www.gospels.net/gjw/mighthavebeenforged.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305100316/http://www.gospels.net/gjw/mighthavebeenforged.pdf|publisher=gospels.net|date=October 11, 2012|archive-date=March 5, 2016|access-date=June 11, 2017}}</ref>
* Papyrus Berolinensis 1171book of Enoch 0 – 6th century Greek fragment, possibly from an apocryphal gospel or amulet based on John. * Papyrus Berolinensis 1171, Book of Enoch 0-6th century Greek fragment, possibly from an apocryphal gospel or amulet based on John.
* Papyrus Cairensis 10735 – 6th or 7th century Greek fragment, possibly from a lost gospel, may be a homily or commentary * Papyrus Cairensis 10735 – 6th or 7th century Greek fragment, possibly from a lost gospel, may be a homily or commentary.
* Papyrus Merton 51 – fragment from apocryphal gospel or a homily on Luke 6:7 * Papyrus Merton 51 – fragment from apocryphal gospel or a homily on Luke 6:7.
* Strasbourg Fragment – fragment of a lost gospel, probably related to ] * Strasbourg Fragment – fragment of a lost gospel, likely related to ].


==Medieval gospels== ==Medieval gospels==
* ] – a lost 8th or 9th century Manichean work * ] – a lost 8th or 9th century Manichean work.
* ] – a post-10th century Christian devotional work (or works) in many variants, the first section is highly dependent upon the 5th century Acts of Pilate * ] – a post-10th century Christian devotional work (or works) in many variants; the first section is highly dependent upon the 5th century Acts of Pilate.
* ] – a 16th century harmony of the four canonical gospels, probably of Spanish (]) origin, or possibly Italian * ] – a 12th century Cathar scripture.
* ] – a 16th century harmony of the four canonical gospels, probably of Spanish (]) origin, or possibly Italian.
* ] – a 12th century Cathar scripture


==Modern gospels== ==Modern gospels==
{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}<!--criteria for inclusion: An article exists, or a good reference exists to show partial notability. --> <!--criteria for inclusion: An article exists, or a good reference exists to show partial notability. -->
=== XIX Century ===
⚫ * ] (1908)

⚫ * ] (1830)
⚫ * ] (1907){{efn|The Eye-Witness gospel is a gospel written by Elsie Louise Morris and/or Benjamin Fish Austin. The gospel purports to be an old manuscript found in an old Alexandria Library giving a graphic and detailed account of Jesus as a friend of Jesus. The gospel states that Jesus did not die on the cross, but died six months later. The gospel references the Essenes a lot, and is allegedly written by an elder of the Essene order who was a close friend of Jesus'. The document was discovered in a building in Alexandria, but since then, the document has disappeared. It was published in 1907 by John Richardson and again by the Holmes Book Company in 1919. This information was retrieved from 4Enoch.org}}
⚫ * ] (1937; 1974)
⚫ * ] (1908, Steiner){{efn|The Fifth Gospel by ] is another gospel obtained from ]. The gospel is in the form of 13 lectures. The book contains Zoroastrian themes along with Christian themes. The gospel states that the Lord's Prayer is based on an ancient pagan prayer that Jesus obtained from Ahriman. Steiner states that the Gospel can be read at Akashic Record. The gospel's authenticity is doubted because ] and ] both produced stories of Jesus' life from Akashic Record. Most of the text can be read at Google Books with the title The Fifth Gospel: From the Akashic Record.}}
⚫ * The Fifth Gospel (1956, Naber){{efn|Hans Naber (or Kurt Berna) was a soldier in World War II who claimed to have been given a message from Jesus Christ about the ] and that he did not die on the cross. He claimed too much blood was on the shroud and that corpses do not bleed, thus the person was probably alive or dying. He published a series of books in an attempt to prove that Jesus did not die on the cross, but survived and went to India. The Fifth Gospel ({{lang|de|Das Fünfte Evangelium}}) was a book in which he attempted to prove that Jesus traveled to India with ] and ].}}
⚫ * ] (1993, Vandenberg), Novel
⚫ * ] (1974)
⚫ * ] (1977){{efn|Grabriele Wittek, founder of the new religious movement ] published this gospel as a rebuilding of the gospel of the Holy Twelve. The full title of the book is ''This Is My Word – Alpha and Omega: The Gospel of Jesus. the Christ Revelation, which True Christians the World Over Have Come to Know.'' The gospel can be read online at Das-Wort Publishing House in Universelles Leben.}}
⚫ * ] (1927)
⚫ * ] (1904){{efn|] was a French poet who claimed to have found gospel written by the Apostle ]. He said he found the manuscript at the St. Wolfgang Abbey. Unlike other biblical hoaxes, Mendes presented the manuscript, which was written in Old Latin that the Romans had used. However, the manuscript was quickly proved to be a hoax as it was written by Mendes. The gospel is an infancy Gospel attributed to the Apostle Peter. It was originally written in Latin by Mendes but was eventually translated into French by Mendes. The title of the original book is {{lang|fr|L'Evangile de l'enfance de Notre Seigneur Jésus Christ selon Saint Pierre, mis en français par Catulle Mendès d'après le manuscrit de l'Abbaye de Saint Wolfgang}}, or ''The Gospel of the infancy of our Lord Jesus Christ according to Saint Pierre, translated into French by Catulle Mendès from the manuscript of the Abbey of St. Wolfgang.''}}
⚫ * ] (1881)
* ] (1820) * ] (1820)
⚫ * ] (1830)
⚫ * ] (1917){{efn|], founder of the ] movement published a book called Jehoshua the Nazir. He claimed to get it from various Eastern mysterious sources. The book was first published in 1917 with the title ''Yehoshua Nazir; Jesus the Nazarite; life of Christ.'' The book is accepted as scripture by the Mazdaznan followers. The text is available on the Internet Text Archive.}}
⚫ * ] of the Essenes (1848){{efn|] was a German writer and journalist, most notable for his revision of ] in 1848. In 1867 he published the ''Ur-Gospel of the Essenes'' ({{lang|de|Urevangelium der Essäer}}). It was also known as the ''Fifth Gospel'' ({{lang|de|Das Fünfte Evangelium}}) and later as ''Jesus the Nazarene — Life, Teachings and Natural Death of the Wisest of the Wise. Reality Retold and Dedicated to the German People'' ({{lang|de|Jesus der Nazarener — Des Weisesten der Weisen Leben, Lehre und natürliches Ende. Der Wirklichkeit nacherzählt und dem deutschen Volke gewidmet.}}) The book has not been translated into English and the full text in German is available at the internet text archive under the title {{lang|de|Jesus der Nazarener}}.}}
⚫ * ] (1929){{efn|] was a notable ] author and author of the Mystical Life of Jesus. The gospel was allegedly inspired by the Aquarian Gospel. The book is a collection of records about Jesus retrieved from the ancient monastreries of the Essenes and the Rosicrucian Order. Lewis allegedly went with a staff of researchers through Palestine and Egypt visiting holy sites and obtaining information. The book states that Jesus entered priesthood and secret priesthood and talks about the doctrines and secret facts about the resurrection.}}
⚫ * ] (1851–1864)
⚫ * ] (1881)
* ] (1882) * ] (1882)
* ] (1894) * ] (1894)

=== XX Century ===

⚫ * ] (1904){{efn|] was a French poet who claimed to have found gospel written by the Apostle ]. He said he found the manuscript at the St. Wolfgang Abbey. Unlike other biblical hoaxes, Mendes presented the manuscript, which was written in Old Latin that the Romans had used. However, the manuscript was quickly proved to be a hoax as it was written by Mendes. The gospel is an infancy Gospel attributed to the Apostle Peter. It was originally written in Latin by Mendes but was eventually translated into French by Mendes. The title of the original book is {{lang|fr|L'Evangile de l'enfance de Notre Seigneur Jésus Christ selon Saint Pierre, mis en français par Catulle Mendès d'après le manuscrit de l'Abbaye de Saint Wolfgang}}, or ''The Gospel of the infancy of our Lord Jesus Christ according to Saint Pierre, translated into French by Catulle Mendès from the manuscript of the Abbey of St. Wolfgang.''}}
⚫ * ] (1907){{efn|The Eye-Witness gospel is a gospel written by Elsie Louise Morris and/or Benjamin Fish Austin. The gospel purports to be an old manuscript found in an old Alexandria Library giving a graphic and detailed account of Jesus as a friend of Jesus. The gospel states that Jesus did not die on the cross, but died six months later. The gospel references the Essenes a lot, and is allegedly written by an elder of the Essene order who was a close friend of Jesus'. The document was discovered in a building in Alexandria, but since then, the document has disappeared. It was published in 1907 by John Richardson and again by the Holmes Book Company in 1919. This information was retrieved from 4Enoch.org}}
⚫ * ] (1908)
⚫ * ] (1908, Steiner){{efn|The Fifth Gospel by ] is another gospel obtained from ]. The gospel is in the form of 13 lectures. The book contains Zoroastrian themes along with Christian themes. The gospel states that the Lord's Prayer is based on an ancient pagan prayer that Jesus obtained from Ahriman. Steiner states that the Gospel can be read at Akashic Record. The gospel's authenticity is doubted because ] and ] both produced stories of Jesus' life from Akashic Record. Most of the text can be read at Google Books with the title The Fifth Gospel: From the Akashic Record.}}
⚫ * ] (1917){{efn|], founder of the ] movement published a book called Jehoshua the Nazir. He claimed to get it from various Eastern mysterious sources. The book was first published in 1917 with the title ''Yehoshua Nazir; Jesus the Nazarite; life of Christ.'' The book is accepted as scripture by the Mazdaznan followers. The text is available on the Internet Text Archive.}}
⚫ * ] (1927)
⚫ * ] (1929){{efn|] was a notable ] author and author of the Mystical Life of Jesus. The gospel was allegedly inspired by the Aquarian Gospel. The book is a collection of records about Jesus retrieved from the ancient monastreries of the Essenes and the Rosicrucian Order. Lewis allegedly went with a staff of researchers through Palestine and Egypt visiting holy sites and obtaining information. The book states that Jesus entered priesthood and secret priesthood and talks about the doctrines and secret facts about the resurrection.}} – based heavily on The Aquarian Gospel where entire chapters were plagiarized
⚫ * ] (1937; 1974)
* ] (1955) * ] (1955)
⚫ * ] of the Essenes (1848){{efn|] was a German writer and journalist, most notable for his revision of ] in 1848. In 1867 he published the ''Ur-Gospel of the Essenes'' ({{lang|de|Urevangelium der Essäer}}). It was also known as the ''Fifth Gospel'' ({{lang|de|Das Fünfte Evangelium}}) and later as ''Jesus the Nazarene — Life, Teachings and Natural Death of the Wisest of the Wise. Reality Retold and Dedicated to the German People'' ({{lang|de|Jesus der Nazarener — Des Weisesten der Weisen Leben, Lehre und natürliches Ende. Der Wirklichkeit nacherzählt und dem deutschen Volke gewidmet.}}) The book has not been translated into English and the full text in German is available at the internet text archive under the title {{lang|de|Jesus der Nazarener}}.}}
⚫ * ] (1851–1864)
⚫ * ] (1972)
* ] (1956) * ] (1956)
⚫ * The Fifth Gospel (1956, Naber){{efn|Hans Naber (or Kurt Berna) was a soldier in World War II who claimed to have been given a message from Jesus Christ about the ] and that he did not die on the cross. He claimed too much blood was on the shroud and that corpses do not bleed, thus the person was probably alive or dying. He published a series of books in an attempt to prove that Jesus did not die on the cross, but survived and went to India. The Fifth Gospel ({{lang|de|Das Fünfte Evangelium}}) was a book in which he attempted to prove that Jesus traveled to India with ] and ].}}
{{div col end}}
⚫ * ] (1972)
⚫ * ] (1974)
⚫ * ] (1977){{efn|Grabriele Wittek, founder of the new religious movement ] published this gospel as a rebuilding of the gospel of the Holy Twelve. The full title of the book is ''This Is My Word – Alpha and Omega: The Gospel of Jesus. the Christ Revelation, which True Christians the World Over Have Come to Know.'' The gospel can be read online at Das-Wort Publishing House in Universelles Leben.}}
⚫ * ] (1993, Vandenberg), Novel


== See also == == See also ==
Line 153: Line 160:
* '']'' * '']''
* '']'' * '']''
* '' ]''
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 168: Line 176:


==References== ==References==
* {{Cite book
|last1 = Cross
|first1 = Frank Leslie
|last2 = Livingstone
|first2 = Elizabeth A.
|title = The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church
|publisher = Oxford University Press
|year = 2005
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=fUqcAQAAQBAJ
|isbn = 978-0192802903
}}
* ''New Testament Apocrypha'', by Wilhelm Schneemelcher, R. M. Wilson. * ''New Testament Apocrypha'', by Wilhelm Schneemelcher, R. M. Wilson.
* ''New Testament Apocrypha: Gospels and Related Writings'', by Wilhelm Schneemelcher, R. M. Wilson. * ''New Testament Apocrypha: Gospels and Related Writings'', by Wilhelm Schneemelcher, R. M. Wilson.
* {{Cite book
| last = Tuckett
| first = Christopher
| chapter = Gospel, Gospels
| editor1-last = Freedman
| editor1-first = David Noel
| editor2-last = Myers
| editor2-first = Allen C.
| title = Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible
| year = 2000
| publisher = Eerdmans
| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=qRtUqxkB7wkC&pg=PA523
| isbn = 978-9053565032
}}
* ''History of the Christian Religion to the Year Two Hundred'', by Charles B. Waite. * ''History of the Christian Religion to the Year Two Hundred'', by Charles B. Waite.
* {{cite book |title=Christianity: A Very Short Introduction |last=Woodhead |first=Linda |year=2004 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0dFLBAAAQBAJ |isbn=978-0199687749}} * {{cite book |title=Christianity: A Very Short Introduction |last=Woodhead |first=Linda |year=2004 |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0dFLBAAAQBAJ |isbn=978-0199687749}}
Line 175: Line 208:
==External links== ==External links==
* Five lectures given by Rudolf Steiner in 1913 * Five lectures given by Rudolf Steiner in 1913
{{Bibliographies on Christian topics}}
{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gospels}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Gospels}}

Latest revision as of 08:44, 8 January 2025

For gospel as the Christian message, see The Gospel.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "List of gospels" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
A large old Bible, open and displaying two pages of densely-written calligraphy, with some decoration surrounding one section on the left-hand page.
The canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John can be found in most Christian Bibles

Gospels (Greek: εὐαγγέλιον; Latin: evangelium) are written records detailing the life and teachings of Jesus. The term originally referred to the Christian message itself but later came to refer to the books in which the message was written.

Gospels are a genre of ancient biography in early Christian literature. The New Testament includes four canonical gospels, but there are many gospels not included in the biblical canon. These additional gospels are referred to as either New Testament apocrypha or pseudepigrapha. Some of these texts have impacted Christian traditions, including many forms of iconography.

Canonical gospels

Main article: Canonical gospels See also: New Testament, Christian biblical canons, and Development of the New Testament canon

Hypothesized sources of the synoptic gospels

Main articles: Two-source hypothesis and Four-document hypothesis
  • Q source – Q is a material common to Matthew and Luke, but not found in Mark
  • M source – M is a material unique to Matthew
  • L source – L is a material unique to Luke

Hypothesized sources of the Gospel of John

  • Signs Gospel – narrative of the Seven Signs
  • Discourses Gospel – source of the discourse material

Apocrypha and pseudepigrapha

Main articles: Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha

Closely related to the Canonical Gospels

Gnostic gospels

Main article: Gnostic Gospels

Jewish-Christian gospels

Main article: Jewish-Christian gospels

Infancy gospels

Other gospels

Partially preserved gospels

Fragmentary preserved gospels

Fragmentary gospels are those preserved from primary sources.

  • Gospel of Eve – mentioned only once by Epiphanius around 400 AD, who preserves a single brief passage in quotation.
  • Gospel of Mani – 3rd century – attributed to the Persian Mani, the founder of Manichaeism.
  • Gospel of the Savior (also known as the Unknown Berlin gospel) – highly fragmentary 6th century manuscript based on a late 2nd or early 3rd century original, a dialogue rather than a narrative, heavily Gnostic in character in that salvation is dependent upon possessing secret knowledge.
  • Coptic Gospel of the Twelve – late 2nd century Coptic language work – although often equated with the Gospel of the Ebionites, it appears to be an attempt at retelling the Gospel of John in the pattern of the Synoptics; it quotes extensively from the Gospel of John.

Reconstructed gospels

Reconstructed gospels are those preserved from secondary sources and commentaries.

  • Secret Gospel of Mark – legitimacy is a subject of debate as the single source mentioning it is considered by many to be a modern forgery, and was lost before it could be independently authenticated.
  • Gospel of Matthias – a lost text from the New Testament apocrypha. The content has been surmised from descriptions in works by church fathers.

Lost gospels

  • Gospel of Cerinthus – around 90-120 AD according to Epiphanius, this is a Jewish gospel identical to the Gospel of the Ebionites, and apparently a truncated version of the Gospel of Matthew, according to the Hebrews.
  • Gospel of Apelles – mid to late 2nd century, a further edited version of Marcion's edited version of Luke.
  • Gospel of Valentinus
  • Gospel of the Encratites
  • Gospel of Andrew – mentioned by only two 5th century sources (Augustine and Pope Innocent I) who list it as apocryphal.
  • Gospel of Bartholomew – mentioned by only two 5th century sources, Jerome and Gelasian Decree which both list it as apocryphal.
  • Gospel of Hesychius – mentioned only by Jerome and the Decree of Gelasius, which both list it as apocryphal.
  • Gospel of Lucius – mentioned only by Jerome and the Decree of Gelasius, which list it as apocryphal.
  • Gospel of Merinthus – mentioned only by Epiphanius; thought by most to be the Gospel of Cerinthus, with the confusion due to a scribal error.
  • An unknown number of other Gnostic gospels not cited by name.
  • Gospel of the Adversary of the Law and the Prophets.
  • Memoirs of the Apostles – a lost narrative of the life of Jesus, mentioned by Justin Martyr; the passages quoted by Justin may have originated from a gospel harmony of the Synoptic Gospels composed by Justin or his school.

Fragments of possibly unknown or lost (or existing) gospels

Fragmentary gospels are those preserved from primary sources.

  • Papyrus Egerton 2 – late 2nd century manuscript of a possibly earlier original; contents parallel John 5:39–47, 10:31–39; Matthew 1:40–45, 8:1–4, 22:15–22; Mark 1:40–45, 12:13–17; and Luke 5:12–16, 17:11–14, 20:20–26, but differ textually; also contains an incomplete miracle account which has no equivalent in the canonical Gospels.
  • Fayyum Fragment – a fragment of about 100 Greek letters in 3rd century script; the text seems to parallel Mark 14:26–31.
  • Oxyrhynchus Papyri – fragments #1, 654, and 655 appear to be fragments of Thomas; #210 is related to Matthew 7:17–19 and Luke 6:43–44 but not identical to them; #840 contains a short vignette about Jesus and a Pharisee not found in any known gospel, the source text is probably mid-2nd century; #1224 consists of paraphrases of Mark 2:17 and Luke 9:50.
  • Gospel of Jesus' Wife – modern forgery based on the Gospel of Thomas.
  • Papyrus Berolinensis 1171, Book of Enoch 0-6th century Greek fragment, possibly from an apocryphal gospel or amulet based on John.
  • Papyrus Cairensis 10735 – 6th or 7th century Greek fragment, possibly from a lost gospel, may be a homily or commentary.
  • Papyrus Merton 51 – fragment from apocryphal gospel or a homily on Luke 6:7.
  • Strasbourg Fragment – fragment of a lost gospel, likely related to Acts of John.

Medieval gospels

Modern gospels

XIX Century

XX Century

See also

Notes

  1. Mentioned by Tertullian in Adversus Valentinianos, according to Irenaeus, it is the same as the Gospel of Truth
  2. Epiphanius ascribed a gospel to the sect of Encratites. It is more probable however, that he referred to the Gospel of Tatian
  3. Augustine and Innocent only mentioned it once with no information about it. If it is the same as the Acts of Andrew, then it was written around 150–250 AD and is not lost, and is kind of a Christian retelling of the Odyssey, only with St. Andrew in the lead role.
  4. Jerome mentions it also in Catul. Script. Eccles. in Pantæn.
  5. This phrase is found in the Decree of Gelasius wherein certain gospels are condemned by that title. What they were is uncertain. Jerome speaks of "those books which go under the names of Lucian and Hesychius and are esteemed through the perverse humors of some".
  6. The Gospel of Merinthus is mentioned only by Epiphanius as one of those spurious gospels which he supposes were written in the apostles' time and referred to by Luke in Luke 1:1 "as not being a true and genuine account". Fabricius supposes that Merinthus and Cerinthus are the same person and that Cerinthus was changed into Merinthus by the way of banter or reproach. Although Epiphanius makes them into two different persons, yet in the heresy of the Cerinthians, he professes himself uncertain. He said "The Cerinthians are also called Merinthians as we see by the accounts we have; but whether this Cerinthus was also called Merinthus, a fellow laborer of his, God knows".
  7. The Gnostics had various gospels. Epiphanius speaks of their writing "The Revelation of Adam, and other false gospels".
  8. Friedrich Clemens Gerke was a German writer and journalist, most notable for his revision of Morse Code in 1848. In 1867 he published the Ur-Gospel of the Essenes (Urevangelium der Essäer). It was also known as the Fifth Gospel (Das Fünfte Evangelium) and later as Jesus the Nazarene — Life, Teachings and Natural Death of the Wisest of the Wise. Reality Retold and Dedicated to the German People (Jesus der Nazarener — Des Weisesten der Weisen Leben, Lehre und natürliches Ende. Der Wirklichkeit nacherzählt und dem deutschen Volke gewidmet.) The book has not been translated into English and the full text in German is available at the internet text archive under the title Jesus der Nazarener.
  9. Catulle Mendès was a French poet who claimed to have found gospel written by the Apostle Peter. He said he found the manuscript at the St. Wolfgang Abbey. Unlike other biblical hoaxes, Mendes presented the manuscript, which was written in Old Latin that the Romans had used. However, the manuscript was quickly proved to be a hoax as it was written by Mendes. The gospel is an infancy Gospel attributed to the Apostle Peter. It was originally written in Latin by Mendes but was eventually translated into French by Mendes. The title of the original book is L'Evangile de l'enfance de Notre Seigneur Jésus Christ selon Saint Pierre, mis en français par Catulle Mendès d'après le manuscrit de l'Abbaye de Saint Wolfgang, or The Gospel of the infancy of our Lord Jesus Christ according to Saint Pierre, translated into French by Catulle Mendès from the manuscript of the Abbey of St. Wolfgang.
  10. The Eye-Witness gospel is a gospel written by Elsie Louise Morris and/or Benjamin Fish Austin. The gospel purports to be an old manuscript found in an old Alexandria Library giving a graphic and detailed account of Jesus as a friend of Jesus. The gospel states that Jesus did not die on the cross, but died six months later. The gospel references the Essenes a lot, and is allegedly written by an elder of the Essene order who was a close friend of Jesus'. The document was discovered in a building in Alexandria, but since then, the document has disappeared. It was published in 1907 by John Richardson and again by the Holmes Book Company in 1919. This information was retrieved from 4Enoch.org
  11. The Fifth Gospel by Rudolf Steiner is another gospel obtained from Akashic records. The gospel is in the form of 13 lectures. The book contains Zoroastrian themes along with Christian themes. The gospel states that the Lord's Prayer is based on an ancient pagan prayer that Jesus obtained from Ahriman. Steiner states that the Gospel can be read at Akashic Record. The gospel's authenticity is doubted because Levi Dowling and Edgar Cayce both produced stories of Jesus' life from Akashic Record. Most of the text can be read at Google Books with the title The Fifth Gospel: From the Akashic Record.
  12. Otoman Zar-Adusht Ha'nish, founder of the Mazdaznan movement published a book called Jehoshua the Nazir. He claimed to get it from various Eastern mysterious sources. The book was first published in 1917 with the title Yehoshua Nazir; Jesus the Nazarite; life of Christ. The book is accepted as scripture by the Mazdaznan followers. The text is available on the Internet Text Archive.
  13. Harvey Lewis was a notable Rosicrucian author and author of the Mystical Life of Jesus. The gospel was allegedly inspired by the Aquarian Gospel. The book is a collection of records about Jesus retrieved from the ancient monastreries of the Essenes and the Rosicrucian Order. Lewis allegedly went with a staff of researchers through Palestine and Egypt visiting holy sites and obtaining information. The book states that Jesus entered priesthood and secret priesthood and talks about the doctrines and secret facts about the resurrection.
  14. Hans Naber (or Kurt Berna) was a soldier in World War II who claimed to have been given a message from Jesus Christ about the Shroud of Turin and that he did not die on the cross. He claimed too much blood was on the shroud and that corpses do not bleed, thus the person was probably alive or dying. He published a series of books in an attempt to prove that Jesus did not die on the cross, but survived and went to India. The Fifth Gospel (Das Fünfte Evangelium) was a book in which he attempted to prove that Jesus traveled to India with Mary Magdelene and Thomas the Apostle.
  15. Grabriele Wittek, founder of the new religious movement Universal Life published this gospel as a rebuilding of the gospel of the Holy Twelve. The full title of the book is This Is My Word – Alpha and Omega: The Gospel of Jesus. the Christ Revelation, which True Christians the World Over Have Come to Know. The gospel can be read online at Das-Wort Publishing House in Universelles Leben.

Footnotes

  1. Tuckett 2000, p. 522.
  2. Cross & Livingstone 2005, p. 697.
  3. "The Story Of The Storytellers - What Are The Gospels? | From Jesus To Christ | FRONTLINE | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2024-10-29.
  4. ^ Jerome, St. (2008). St. Jerome: Commentary on Matthew. Translated by Scheck, Thomas. New York: The Catholic University of America Press. pp. 51–52.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  5. Harris, J. R., ed. The Gospel of the Twelve Apostles Together with the Apocalypses of Each One of Them (Cambridge, 1900).
  6. Pan. Hæres. 26. § 2
  7. Wilson, Robert (1975). Tenney, Merrill (ed.). The Zondervan pictorial encyclopedia of the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House. p. 311. ISBN 0310331889. Retrieved 13 February 2023. A late and secondary compilation, ultimately dependent on the Protevangelium of James and the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, but greatly amplified. It derives from a Syr. original, but the date of this source is doubtful.

    Also available on BibleGateway.com's Encyclopedia of the Bible (which is derived from the Zondervan work)
  8. Ehrman, Bart; Pleše, Zlatko (December 18, 2013). Ehrman, Bart (ed.). The Other Gospels: Accounts of Jesus from Outside the New Testament. USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 58–77. ISBN 9780199335220. The Latin Infancy Gospel ... is a later account of the births and early lives of Mary and Jesus
  9. Jarus, Owen (February 3, 2015). "Newfound 'Gospel of the Lots of Mary' Discovered in Ancient Text". Live Science. Retrieved February 8, 2015.
  10. Pan. Haer. 28.5.1., I 317.10
  11. Jones, A new and full method of settling the canonical authority of the New Testament
  12. Augustine, Contra Adversarium Legis et Prophetarum, 2.3.14.
  13. Ariel Sabar. "The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus's Wife". The Atlantic. Retrieved June 18, 2016.
  14. Bernhard, Andrew (October 11, 2012). "How The Gospel of Jesus's Wife Might Have Been Forged" (PDF). gospels.net. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 5, 2016. Retrieved June 11, 2017.

References

External links

Bibliographies on Christian topics
Topics
Denominations
Locations
By or about
Christian figures
Categories: