Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 12:23, 26 November 2024

2023 Venezuelan referendum

3 December 2023 (2023-12-03)
Voting system	Majority vote
Outcome	Turnout: 51.01% (officially)
1. Do you agree to reject by all means in accordance with the law, the line fraudulently interposed by the 1899 Paris Arbitration Award, which seeks to deprive us of our Guayana Esequiba?
Declared	99.89%
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 10,315,485 98.00% No 210,329 2.00% Valid votes 10,525,814 99.72% Invalid or blank votes 29,278 0.28% Total votes 10,555,092 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 51.01%
2. Do you support the 1966 Geneva Agreement as the only valid legal instrument to reach a practical and satisfactory solution for Venezuela and Guyana regarding the controversy over the territory of Guayana Esequiba?
Declared	99.89%
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 10,322,718 98.27% No 181,725 1.73% Valid votes 10,504,443 99.52% Invalid or blank votes 50,649 0.48% Total votes 10,555,092 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 51.01%
3. Do you agree with Venezuela's historical position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice to resolve the territorial controversy over Guayana Esequiba?
Declared	99.89%
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 10,132,099 98.24% No 181,725 1.76% Valid votes 10,313,824 99.51% Invalid or blank votes 50,649 0.49% Total votes 10,364,473 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 51.01%
4. Do you agree to oppose, by all legal means, Guyana's claim to unilaterally dispose of a sea pending delimitation, illegally and in violation of international law?
Declared	99.89%
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 10,134,189 96.37% No 381,770 3.63% Valid votes 10,515,959 99.63% Invalid or blank votes 39,133 0.37% Total votes 10,555,092 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 51.01%
5. Do you agree with the creation of the Guayana Esequiba state and the development of an accelerated plan for comprehensive care for the current and future population of that territory, which includes, among others, the granting of citizenship and identity card? Venezuela, in accordance with the Geneva Agreement and International Law, consequently incorporating said state on the map of Venezuelan territory?
Declared	99.89%
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 10,070,255 96.37% No 379,397 3.63% Valid votes 10,449,652 99.00% Invalid or blank votes 105,440 1.00% Total votes 10,555,092 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 51.01%

Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute
History
Schomburgk Line (1840) Venezuelan crisis (1895) Paris Arbitral Award (1899) Mallet-Prevost memorandum (1949) Geneva Agreement (1966) Rupununi uprising (1969) Port of Spain Protocol (1970) 2023 Guyana–Venezuela crisis Venezuelan referendum
v t e

A consultative referendum was initiated by the government of Nicolás Maduro regarding Venezuela's claim over the Guayana Esequiba, whose territory is disputed with, and controlled by, neighboring Guyana. The referendum took place on 3 December 2023 in Venezuela. The population of the territory in question was not consulted and did not vote as voting only took place within Venezuela.

The referendum consisted of five questions concerning various aspects of Venezuela's claim to territory controlled and administered by Guyana, including rejection of the International Court of Justice's jurisdiction over the dispute, the establishment of a Guayana Esequiba state, and granting its population immediate Venezuelan citizenship. The referendum was one of the contributing factors for the Guyana–Venezuela crisis.

According to the Venezuelan government, more than 95% of Venezuelans who voted selected "yes" on each of the five questions on the ballot. International analysts and media reported that turnout had been remarkably low and that the Venezuelan government had falsified the results.

Following the poor turnout, the chief prosecutor of Venezuela, Tarek William Saab, accused opposition leaders of sabotaging the referendum and issued arrest warrants for 15 of them, with charges such as treason and conspiracy. This appeared to be a further attempt to suppress political opposition ahead of the 2024 presidential election, despite free and fair elections being agreed with the US as a condition for lifting sanctions.

Background

The territory controlled and administered by Guyana and claimed by Venezuela is a 159,500 km (61,600 sq mi) region west of the Essequibo River. Portions of the area were formerly under the control of the Dutch empire as part of the Essequibo colony. In 1814, the British acquired the area as a result of a treaty with the Netherlands. Following the establishment of Gran Colombia in 1819, territorial disputes began between Gran Colombia, later Venezuela, who annexed Essequibo, and the British, who appointed Robert Hermann Schomburgk to define the western boundary in 1835. His "Schomburgk line" established the boundary and coincided with the position of Essequibo according to the older maps of the Dutch. In 1841 the government of José Antonio Páez denounced, instead, the incursion of Venezuelan territory by the British Empire.

Subsequently, gold was discovered in the Yuruarí River basin in 1876. In 1895, Venezuela sought the support of the United States and advocated for the country to intervene in the dispute through the Monroe Doctrine. The United States House of Representatives proposed Resolution 252 to Congress, which recommended the dispute be resolved by international arbitration following pressure from American president Grover Cleveland. During the Venezuelan crisis of 1895, the Schomburgk Line was proposed as a border between Venezuela and British Guiana but neither of the parties agreed on the exact boundary. With the Treaty of Washington in 1897, however, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Venezuela both agreed to arbitration with the expectation that the arbitral ruling in Paris would ultimately be a "full, perfect, and final settlement" to the border dispute. It was the belief that the resulting decision was a compromise between the great powers of the time.

The region's status is subject to the Geneva Agreement of 1966, signed by the governments of the United Kingdom, Venezuela, and British Guiana. The agreement stipulated that the parties involved will agree to find a peaceful, practical, and satisfactory resolution to the dispute. Venezuela argues that the 1966 agreement nullified the results of the original arbitration that established the Schomburgk line as the border between Venezuela and Guyana. Venezuela's claim to the territory it calls "Guayana Esequiba" is one of the only issues that receives unified support from both chavistas and the Venezuelan opposition.

Venezuela insists on following the terms of the 1966 agreement and achieving a solution through dialogue. Venezuela believes that the principle of uti possidetis would apply in the situation. Guyana's leadership rejects direct dialogue with Venezuela on the matter and President of Guyana Irfaan Ali insists on a resolution done through the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Venezuela, in turn, does not recognize the legitimacy of the ICJ in resolving the dispute. In 2023, the President of Venezuela sent a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations to ask him to mediate the dispute.

Claims over the territory intensified as a result of the discovery of significant discovery of oil and gas deposits on offshore sites of the territory. Critics of the referendum believe that it is a way to test support for the ruling government ahead of next year's elections, as well as creating pressure for international courts to grant Venezuela full rights over the territory.

Questions

The following questions were approved by the National Electoral Council on 23 October 2023 and approved by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Justice Court on 1 November 2023:

1. "Do you agree to reject by all means in accordance with the law, the line fraudulently interposed by the 1899 Paris Arbitration Award, which seeks to deprive us of our Guayana Esequiba?"
2. "Do you support the 1966 Geneva Agreement as the only valid legal instrument to reach a practical and satisfactory solution for Venezuela and Guyana regarding the controversy over the territory of Guayana Esequiba?"
3. "Do you agree with Venezuela's historical position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice to resolve the territorial controversy over Guayana Esequiba?"
4. "Do you agree to oppose, by all legal means, Guyana's claim to unilaterally dispose of a sea pending delimitation, illegally and in violation of international law?"
5. "Do you agree with the creation of the Guayana Esequiba state and the development of an accelerated plan for comprehensive care for the current and future population of that territory, which includes, among others, the granting of citizenship and identity card? Venezuela, in accordance with the Geneva Agreement and International Law, consequently incorporating said state on the map of Venezuelan territory?"

Conduct

On 19 November, a referendum rehearsal was held in Venezuela. On 29 November, an electoral rehearsal was also organized for high school students between the ages of 12 and 18. It was announced that more than 350,000 military personnel would guard the electoral process nationwide.

During the referendum on 3 December, low turnout and presence at polling stations were reported.

The National Electoral Council of Venezuela (CNE) declared that voters chose "yes" more than 95% of the time on each of five questions on the ballot, saying that there was a total of 10,554,320 votes, without specifying if it was the number of voters or of answered questions.

International analysts and media reported that turnout had been remarkably low and that the Venezuelan government had falsified the results. The CNE published and later deleted a table showing around 2 million votes for each of the five questions, suggesting that the votes were counted instead of the voters. Opposition politician Henrique Capriles, who also voted in the referendum, declared that the turnout was around 10.2%, saying that each voter had five choices, which would mean that 2,110,864 people participated. Nevertheless, there existed five votes per ballot for each individual.

Results

Question 1

Do you agree to reject by all means in accordance with the law, the line fraudulently interposed by the 1899 Paris Arbitration Award, which seeks to deprive us of our Guayana Esequiba?

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	10,315,485	98.00
No	210,329	2.00
Invalid or blank votes	29,278	0.28
Total votes	10,525,814	100.00
Registered voters/turnout	20,694,124	51.01
Source: CNE (99.89% declared)

Question 2

Do you support the 1966 Geneva Agreement as the only valid legal instrument to reach a practical and satisfactory solution for Venezuela and Guyana regarding the controversy over the territory of Guayana Esequiba?

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	10,322,718	98.27
No	181,725	1.73
Invalid or blank votes	50,649	0.48
Total votes	10,504,443	100.00
Registered voters/turnout	20,694,124	51.01
Source: CNE (99.89% declared)

Question 3

Do you agree with Venezuela's historical position of not recognizing the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice to resolve the territorial controversy over Guayana Esequiba?

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	10,132,099	96.35
No	384,321	3.65
Invalid or blank votes	38,672	0.37
Total votes	10,516,420	100.00
Registered voters/turnout	20,694,124	51.01
Source: CNE (99.89% declared)

Question 4

Do you agree to oppose, by all legal means, Guyana's claim to unilaterally dispose of a sea pending delimitation, illegally and in violation of international law?

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	10,134,189	96.37
No	381,770	3.63
Invalid or blank votes	39,133	0.37
Total votes	10,515,959	100.00
Registered voters/turnout	20,694,124	51.01
Source: CNE (99.89% declared)

Question 5

Do you agree with the creation of the Guayana Esequiba state and the development of an accelerated plan for comprehensive care for the current and future population of that territory, which includes, among others, the granting of citizenship and identity card? Venezuela, in accordance with the Geneva Agreement and International Law, consequently incorporating said state on the map of Venezuelan territory?

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	10,070,255	96.37
No	379,397	3.63
Invalid or blank votes	105,440	1.00
Total votes	10,449,652	100.00
Registered voters/turnout	20,694,124	51.01
Source: CNE (99.89% declared)

Reactions

International

The proposed questions were condemned by the Guyanese government, which appealed to the International Court of Justice for intervention against Venezuela. The Venezuelan ambassador to Guyana, Carlos Amador Pérez Silva, was summoned by Guyana to express the nation's "deep concern" over the proposed referendum.

The Commonwealth of Nations Secretary-General Patricia Scotland condemned the referendum proposal on grounds of territorial sovereignty. The leadership of the Caribbean Community voiced support for Guyana, stating that the referendum would have no bearing on international law and stating that international law prohibits an individual nation's unilateral seizure of another's territory.

In response to the escalating tensions in the region, Brazil increased its military presence along its northern border in November 2023.

The Secretary General of the Organization of American States (OAS), Luis Almagro, issued a statement condemning the consultation, considering that "it is illegal according to the 1966 Geneva Agreement". In the communiqué, Almagro reiterated that both countries had the responsibility to resolve the dispute peacefully.

Domestic

Within Venezuela, the Episcopal Conference of Venezuela asked that the referendum not be "manipulated by purely political interests or as a means of pressure on citizens", advocating that the conflict between Guyana and Venezuela to be resolved within the framework of "dialogue and law", peacefully and not escalate into a larger dispute.

The Unitary Platform opposition coalition called on the population to decide "freely" and making use of their "free will" whether to participate in the referendum and how to answer to its questions. Opposition politicians Juan Guaidó and Leopoldo López rejected the referendum, as did opposition parties such as Popular Will and Justice First. Opposition presidential candidate María Corina Machado assured that sovereignty was not consulted, but exercised, and asked to suspend the referendum in order to form a national team to file a claim at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Guaidó stated that "Sovereignty, like rights, are exercised and defended. You do not consult them, you do not beg for them", while López said that "The referendum was a failure for the dictatorship". Juan Pablo Guanipa, politician of the Justice First party, also rejected the referendum, declaring "it is a referendum that they organize for everything, except to defend". Through a public statement, Justice First condemned the intention to "politically instrumentalize a matter that corresponds to national sovereignty", and a statement published by Popular Will read: "The territorial integrity of a country must be defined by means of the exercise of the State's authority and backed by the legitimacy granted by international laws and historical tradition", besides denouncing that public employees were being forced to vote in the referendum.

On the other hand, Democratic Action politician, Carlos Prosperi [es], declared that he would participate in the referendum, inviting to participate in it. Henrique Capriles, former presidential candidate (2012 and 2013) and from Justice First, also announced that he would participate in the process, although he rejected its politicization. Manuel Rosales, also a former presidential candidate (2006), also called to vote in the referendum. The Venezuelan government accused the opposition of calling to boycotting the referendum and of violating agreements signed in Barbados, which included the ratification of Venezuela's "historical, sovereign and inalienable rights" over the Essequibo territory.

The Communist Party of Venezuela (PCV), one of the parties banned by the Maduro government, described the referendum as the "old strategy of the bourgeoisie to instill patriotic and chauvinist feelings in a good part of the population (...) making people believe that in our country there is no more important problem to solve", which would serve the State to suspend the 2024 presidential elections.

Former Chavista officials Andrés Izarra and Rafael Ramírez considered the referendum a failure. Ramírez described the process as "a thunderous failure", while Izarra pointed out that pre-referendum polls estimated a turnout of approximately 20%, a figure that Izarra said was an overestimate. After the referendum, Venezuelan political scientist Nicmer Evans [es] declared that the figures caused "irreparable damage" to the credibility of the Electoral Power, the National Electoral Council.

See also

• 1984 Argentine Beagle conflict dispute resolution referendum
• 2018 Guatemalan territorial dispute referendum
• Guyana–Venezuela crisis (2023–present)
• Foreign policy of Nicolás Maduro
• Guyana–Venezuela relations
• South American territorial disputes
• Uti possidetis juris

References

1. "Venezuela sets referendum date on territory dispute with Guyana". Reuters. 20 October 2023. Archived from the original on 7 November 2023. Retrieved 6 November 2023.
2. ^ van den Berg, Stephanie (15 November 2023). "Venezuela tells World Court referendum to go ahead despite Guyana resistance". Reuters. Archived from the original on 28 November 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
3. ^ Paredes, Norberto (1 December 2023). "Esequibo: 5 claves para entender el controvertido referendo en Venezuela sobre la región que le disputa a Guyana". BBC News (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 1 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
4. ^ Shortell, David (4 December 2023). "Venezuelans approve takeover of oil-rich region of Guyana in referendum". CNN. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023. In a news conference announcing preliminary results from the first tranche of counted votes, the Venezuelan National Electoral Council said voters chose "yes" more than 95% of the time on each of five questions on the ballot.
5. ^ Luke Taylor (4 December 2023). "Maduro vote to claim Guyana's territory backfires as Venezuelans stay home". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
6. Genevieve Glatsky; Isayen Herrera (6 December 2023). "Venezuela Orders Arrest of Top Opposition Figures, Claiming Treason". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
7. British Guiana Boundary: Arbitration with the United States of Venezuela. The Case (and Appendix) on Behalf of the Government of Her Britannic Majesty Archived 8 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine Volume 7. Printed at the Foreign office, by Harrison and sons, 1898.
8. ^ Paredes, Norberto (4 October 2023). "Esequibo: por qué se agudizó la disputa por la zona que enfrenta a Guyana y Venezuela desde hace casi dos siglos". BBC News Mundo (in Spanish). British Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 27 November 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
9. Jacob Roggeveen, "Het Brandende Veen", 1675; van Bouchenroeder, 1797, Nationaal Archief, inv. nr. 1489.
10. "Treaty of arbitration between Venezuela and Great Britain, signed at Washington and dated the second day of February, 1897" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2013. Retrieved 30 October 2013.
11. "Summary of the Judgement of 18 December 2020" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
12. Garcia Cano, Regina; Arraez, Juan (29 November 2023). "Venezuela's planned vote over territory dispute leaves Guyana residents on edge". ABC News. A. B. C. News. Archived from the original on 29 November 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
13. ^ Chabrol, Denis (23 October 2023). "Venezuelan electoral council approves five questions for referendum on Essequibo". Demerara Waves Online News- Guyana. Archived from the original on 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
14. "Venezuela realiza con "éxito" simulacro de referendo por zona en disputa con Guyana". France24. 19 November 2023. Archived from the original on 19 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
15. "Bachilleres participan en referendo "simbólico" sobre el Esequibo". ALnavío (in Spanish). 29 November 2023. Archived from the original on 2 December 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
16. "Bachilleres participan en simulacro electoral sobre el Esequibo". El Nacional. 29 November 2023. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
17. "Más de 350.000 militares custodiarán el referendo sobre el Esequibo". El Nacional. 29 November 2023. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
18. "FOTOS | Se registra poca afluencia de electores en el referendo no vinculante sobre el Esequibo". Monitoreamos. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 6 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
19. "Referéndum consultivo comienza con una escasa afluencia de electores en los centros". Runrunes. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 6 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
20. "Poca afluencia de venezolanos en el referendo del Esequibo convocado por Maduro". ABC. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 6 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
21. "Poca afluencia de votantes domina el referendo por el Esequibo". Diario Las Américas. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
22. ^ "Capriles cifra en 89,8% la abstención en el referendo sobre disputa con Guyana". El Nacional (in Spanish). 4 December 2023.
23. ^ "Capriles cifra en 89,8 % la abstención en el referendo venezolano sobre disputa con Guyana". Swissinfo (in Spanish). 4 December 2023. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
24. ""Catástrofe", "descontento", "abstención": Analistas ponen la lupa al referendo de Maduro sobre el Esequibo". NTN24 (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
25. ^ "Pese a los pocos votantes, el régimen de Maduro reportó "millones" de sufragios por el "sí" en el referéndum consultivo". Infobae. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
26. ^ "Venezuela aprueba referendo no vinculante sobre el Esequibo". DW. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2023.
27. "Guyana Summons Venezuelan Ambassador In Border Spat". Barrons. AFP-Agence France Presse. 24 September 2023. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
28. "Statement by the Commonwealth Secretary-General on the escalation of the Guyana-Venezuela border dispute". Commonwealth. Archived from the original on 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
29. "Caricom urges respect for international law". Jamaica Observer. 26 October 2023. Archived from the original on 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
30. Chabrol, Denis (25 October 2023). "CARICOM says Venezuela's referendum has no bearing on international law". Demerara Waves Online News- Guyana. Archived from the original on 3 November 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
31. "Brazil increases northern border military presence amid Venezuela-Guyana spat -ministry". Reuters. 29 November 2023. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 30 November 2023.
32. Peralta, Patricio (27 October 2023). "Crece tensión entre Guyana y Venezuela por cuestionado referendo sobre el Esequibo". France 24 (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 4 November 2023. Retrieved 4 November 2023.
33. Rodríguez Rosas, Ronny (24 November 2023). "Obispos piden "no manipular" con referendo del Esequibo". Efecto Cocuyo. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
34. "Obispos de Venezuela: No manipular el referéndum con fines políticos o de presión". Vatican News. 23 November 2023. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
35. ^ "Oposición de Venezuela llama a los ciudadanos a decidir "libremente" sobre preguntas del referendo sobre el Esequibo". Voz de América (in Spanish). 13 November 2023. Archived from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
36. ^ "Guaidó sobre el referéndum sobre el Esequibo: "La soberanía, como los derechos, se ejercen y se defienden. No los consultas, no los mendigas"". Alberto News. 10 November 2023. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
37. ^ Prieto, Dayana (4 December 2023). "Leopoldo López: "El referéndum fue un rotundo fracaso"". EVTV. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
38. ^ Higueras, Martín (5 December 2023). "Maduro busca olvidar sus problemas en Venezuela elevando la tensión con Guyana". Libertad Digital. Archived from the original on 6 December 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
39. "Venezuela: María Corina Machado dice que el referendo por el Esequibo es un "error" y considera que "debe suspenderse"". Voz de América. 22 November 2023. Archived from the original on 25 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
40. "Juan Pablo Guanipa rechazó la consulta del Esequibo: "es un referendo que hacen para todo, menos para defender" – Monitoreamos". Monitoreamos. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
41. "Juan Pablo Guanipa afirma que el referendo es "para todo, menos para defender el Esequibo"". El Nacional. 2 December 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
42. "VP rechaza referendo Esequibo y denuncia que empleados públicos son obligados a votar". Noticiero Digital. 1 December 2023. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
43. "Carlos Prosperi reaparece en redes para apoyar el referendo sobre el Esequibo". Tal Cual. 27 November 2023. Archived from the original on 28 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
44. TalCual (29 November 2023). "Capriles aseguró que votar en el referendo sobre el Esequibo no es apoyar a Maduro". Tal Cual. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
45. "Capriles participará en la consulta sobre el Esequibo: "Esto no se trata de Maduro"". El Nacional. 29 November 2023. Archived from the original on 29 November 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
46. "Manuel Rosales llama a votar en el referendo sobre el Esequibo". 29 de noviembre de 2023. Archived from the original on 3 December 2023. Retrieved 3 December 2023.
47. "PCV se pronunció ante el referendo consultivo sobre el territorio Esequibo". Aporrea. 28 November 2023. Archived from the original on 28 November 2023. Retrieved 29 November 2023.
48. ^ "Andrés Izarra y Rafael Ramírez fustigaron al referendo: "es un estruendoso fracaso"". El Nacional. 3 December 2023.
49. ^ "Rafael Ramírez aseguró que el referendo del Esequibo es "un estruendoso fracaso del madurismo" – Monitoreamos". Monitoreamos. 3 December 2023. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
50. "Poder Electoral aclara que más de 10 millones de personas participaron en referendo sobre el Esequibo". Voz de América (in Spanish). 4 December 2023. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 5 December 2023.

v t e Elections and referendums in Venezuela
Presidential elections	1947 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2000 2006 2012 2013 2018 2024
Parliamentary elections	1832 1835 1838 1841 1844 1847 1850 1853 1856 1859 1863 1873 1877 1882 1888 1890 1894 1898 1922 1929 1931 1936 1941 1947 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Regional elections	1989 1992 1995 1998 2000 2004 2008 2012 2017 2021 2025
Municipal elections	1948 ... 2013 2017 2018 2021 2025
Constituent Assemblies	1811 1819 1821 1830 1857 1858 1864 1874 1881 1891 1893 1901 1904 1909 1914 1922 1925 1928 1931 1936 1946 1952 1961 1999 2017
Referendums	1957 1999 (Apr) 1999 (Dec) 2000 2004 2007 2009 2017 2020 2023

• 2023 controversies
• 2023 referendums
• 2023 in international relations
• 2023 in Venezuela
• December 2023 events in Venezuela
• Referendums in Venezuela
• Border polls
• Crisis in Venezuela
• Guyana–Venezuela relations
• Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute
• Guyana–Venezuela crisis (2023–present)