Revision as of 14:08, 11 January 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,302 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Archive 15) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:01, 16 January 2025 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors378,496 edits →Single-page edition is broken: add to checklist? | ||
(133 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
== Vandalism Removal == | |||
== New former editor-in-chief? == | |||
I'm a bit confused by : is there a new former editor-in-chief who doesn't appear in {{section link|Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/About#Editors in chief}}? ] (]) 02:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:That editor (called ] at this project. I was already out as part of the team so I can't really speak to which issues EricPupper published. As I was a prior regime guy, I'll say no more. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:copperplate gothic light;">] (])</span> 02:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
::My mistake; I forgot (or didn't know about?) the account rename. ] (]) 02:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
I've just found out that an IP ] me and another user from the list last month. Could we do something to prevent that? Thanks ] (]) 14:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Color of section headings == | |||
:{{Ping|JPxG}} should be easy for an admin to change page privileges?? ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 19:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Yeah, this is cooked. I do not see a single IP subscription in this whole list, which suggests there is no reason to not have it semiprotected -- have also taken the liberty of TE-move protecting it because inb4onwheels. <b style="font-family:monospace;color:#E35BD8">]×]]</b> 22:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Writer Request == | |||
Is it just me, or are the black section headings above the white article titles incredibly hard to see? They are placed on top of predominantly dark images, doesn't just make them hard to read, some of them are nearly invisible. Couldn't they just be made a similar color to the article titles themselves? ] (]) 14:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
I would like to help write stories for the Signpost as a official writer. Would that be possible. ] (]) 02:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] Completely agreed! I raised it as well. ~ 🦝 ] (he/him • ]) 13:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Write something good and submit it. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Voilà! ] (]) 03:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Links between Comix columns == | |||
== Last (12-12-24) issue was not announced == | |||
As far as I can tell, six "Comix" columns were published: | |||
Or at least, not through MassMessage. Was that intentional? — ] ] 15:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
:@] it was announced, ]. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 15:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
::Probably because I ask for it interwiki, at enws. Seems that all users of ] did not get it (). — ] ] 15:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
# ] | |||
== Reply button is not working == | |||
Two questions: | |||
While readinga signpost i tried to reply to a comment showing below the page but the button gave me error said | |||
* First two (2022-08-31 and 2022-09-30) link to each other because the name of the column was changed. Shouldn't similar links be added between 2023-01-01 and 2023-12-04? | |||
" Could not find the comment you're replying to on the page" | |||
* 2023-12-24 links to 2023-12-04 at the bottom as {{tq|← Previous "Comix"}}. But 2023-12-04 doesn't link back as {{tq|Next "Comix" →}}. This just seems like a bug. | |||
] (]) 09:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|R1F4T}} - try it now. If you are on the article page, click on the talk tab and then the "edit" or "+" links on the top line. This should work automatically every time, but I think sometimes for the first comment a bit of code gets accidentally removed in the prepublication process (and then it should be just like creating any other talk page). Maybe if the comment was removed while you were typing, you'd get messed up. Maybe if you are commenting on an old article, something different might be happening. ]<sub>(])</sub> <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 19:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
::Very belatedly redoing ping to {{ping|R1F4T}} ... ] (]) 15:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Single-page edition is broken == | |||
What do you think? —] (]) 15:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
] is nearly empty, and ] shows the list of stories (slightly broken) but not the stories itself. {{ping|JPxG}} can you take a look? ] (]) <small>(please use ]!)</small> 08:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Iranian state interference with WP content? == | |||
:In bed but I think it is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2025-01-15/Op-ed -- throwing a ref error is what the single page says. Try <pre>intitle:"Signpost/2025-01-15" insource:/\<ref/</pre> to find ref tags in articles ? I would appreciatr someone helping eith this. <b style="font-family:monospace;color:#E35BD8">]×]]</b> 08:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Here's an interesting article about alleged Iranian state interference with Misplaced Pages content that might be of interest to ''Signpost'' contributors: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/iranian-cyber-army-blamed-as-wikipedia-deletes-atrocities/news-story/3947931532816bc4f1a9c5eca7df5f71 — ] (]) 12:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
::ohhhh i bet its the CALCULATORS. well ok here are the pagesizes | |||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/From the editors}} From the editors | |||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Traffic report}} Traffic report | |||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/In the media}} In the media | |||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Technology report}} Technology report | |||
⚫ | ::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Essay}} Essay | ||
⚫ | ::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Opinion}} Opinion | ||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/News and notes}} News and notes | |||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Serendipity}} Serendipity | |||
⚫ | ::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Op-ed}} Op-ed | ||
⚫ | ::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/In focus}} In focus | ||
::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Arbitration report}} Arbitration report | |||
⚫ | ::* {{PAGESIZE:Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15/Humour}} Humour | ||
::<b style="font-family:monospace;color:#E35BD8">]×]]</b> 08:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Okay, God knows what is actually wrong -- I am severely in need of going back to bed -- but I have gotten some grotesque trailer-park hack to work so that people can, at least, read a working single-page edition for these first few hours. This should be diagnosed and fixed when I wake up. Thanks to {{ping|Tamzin}} for figuring out that just transclusing the articles directly worked... <b style="font-family:monospace;color:#E35BD8">]×]]</b> 08:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::Thank you! ] (]) <small>(please use ]!)</small> 09:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::Looks like the original version of the single page edition works now, but <code>Post‐expand include size: 2003573/2097152 bytes</code> is really close to the limit. You are probably right that the calculator examples take up quite a bit of that limit (The calculator article is 892980 / 2097152 bytes which is 43% of that limit). ] (]) 12:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Possibly unrelated to the above, I cleaned up some mismatched block and article start/end tags that were causing some of the articles to be too narrow in the single-page edition. A check for matching start/end templates could go on the publication checklist. – ] (]) 18:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:01, 16 January 2025
← Current issueWT:POSTFeedbackPlease use this page for general or technical issues, praise, queries, or complaints related to The Signpost as a whole.
|
To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all talk pages of subpages of Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost except /Newsroom redirect here. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The Signpost (talk · chat) |
---|
|
|
|
Recent changes: main · talk |
|
Vandalism Removal
I've just found out that an IP removed me and another user from the list last month. Could we do something to prevent that? Thanks Nobody (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- @JPxG: should be easy for an admin to change page privileges?? ☆ Bri (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is cooked. I do not see a single IP subscription in this whole list, which suggests there is no reason to not have it semiprotected -- have also taken the liberty of TE-move protecting it because inb4onwheels. jp×g🗯️ 22:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Writer Request
I would like to help write stories for the Signpost as a official writer. Would that be possible. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Write something good and submit it. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Voilà! Carrite (talk) 03:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Last (12-12-24) issue was not announced
Or at least, not through MassMessage. Was that intentional? — Alien 3
3 3 15:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Alien333 it was announced, for me at least. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 15:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Probably because I ask for it interwiki, at enws. Seems that all users of the interwiki list did not get it (random example). — Alien 3
3 3 15:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Probably because I ask for it interwiki, at enws. Seems that all users of the interwiki list did not get it (random example). — Alien 3
Reply button is not working
While readinga signpost i tried to reply to a comment showing below the page but the button gave me error said " Could not find the comment you're replying to on the page" R1F4T (talk) 09:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @R1F4T: - try it now. If you are on the article page, click on the talk tab and then the "edit" or "+" links on the top line. This should work automatically every time, but I think sometimes for the first comment a bit of code gets accidentally removed in the prepublication process (and then it should be just like creating any other talk page). Maybe if the comment was removed while you were typing, you'd get messed up. Maybe if you are commenting on an old article, something different might be happening. Smallbones(smalltalk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Very belatedly redoing ping to @R1F4T: ... Graham87 (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Single-page edition is broken
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Single/2025-01-15 is nearly empty, and Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Single shows the list of stories (slightly broken) but not the stories itself. @JPxG: can you take a look? FunIsOptional (talk) (please use ping!) 08:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- In bed but I think it is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2025-01-15/Op-ed -- throwing a ref error is what the single page says. Try
intitle:"Signpost/2025-01-15" insource:/\<ref/
to find ref tags in articles ? I would appreciatr someone helping eith this. jp×g🗯️ 08:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)- ohhhh i bet its the CALCULATORS. well ok here are the pagesizes
- 3,423 From the editors
- 84,211 Traffic report
- 18,148 In the media
- 27,219 Technology report
- 5,495 Essay
- 8,006 Opinion
- 16,051 News and notes
- 11,154 Serendipity
- 19,101 Op-ed
- 16,376 In focus
- 5,760 Arbitration report
- 4,172 Humour
- jp×g🗯️ 08:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, God knows what is actually wrong -- I am severely in need of going back to bed -- but I have gotten some grotesque trailer-park hack to work so that people can, at least, read a working single-page edition for these first few hours. This should be diagnosed and fixed when I wake up. Thanks to @Tamzin: for figuring out that just transclusing the articles directly worked... jp×g🗯️ 08:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! FunIsOptional (talk) (please use ping!) 09:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like the original version of the single page edition works now, but
Post‐expand include size: 2003573/2097152 bytes
is really close to the limit. You are probably right that the calculator examples take up quite a bit of that limit (The calculator article is 892980 / 2097152 bytes which is 43% of that limit). Bawolff (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, God knows what is actually wrong -- I am severely in need of going back to bed -- but I have gotten some grotesque trailer-park hack to work so that people can, at least, read a working single-page edition for these first few hours. This should be diagnosed and fixed when I wake up. Thanks to @Tamzin: for figuring out that just transclusing the articles directly worked... jp×g🗯️ 08:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- ohhhh i bet its the CALCULATORS. well ok here are the pagesizes
Possibly unrelated to the above, I cleaned up some mismatched block and article start/end tags that were causing some of the articles to be too narrow in the single-page edition. A check for matching start/end templates could go on the publication checklist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)