Revision as of 06:40, 18 February 2024 editDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,142 edits →Controversy: cite for second Spaces← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:15, 4 December 2024 edit undo172.3.141.215 (talk) →Calendar | ||
(65 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Use American English|date=February 2024}} | {{Use American English|date=February 2024}} | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2024}} | {{Use mdy dates|date=February 2024}} | ||
] | |||
{{mi| | |||
⚫ | The '''Calendargate''' controversy among ] developed in December 2023 after the release of a 2024 calendar featuring photographs of female conservative activists and commentators, several of whom wore revealing clothing. Debates online among conservatives, including some of the women who had posed for the calendar, continued on social media websites into 2024.<ref name="Vox article">{{cite news|last=Beauchamp|first=Zack|title=How a horny beer calendar sparked a conservative civil war|url=https://www.vox.com/politics/2024/1/10/24024341/calendargate-conservative-civil-war|newspaper=]|publisher=]|date=January 10, 2024|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref> | ||
{{notability|date=February 2024}} | |||
{{primary sources|date=February 2024}} | |||
}} | |||
⚫ | The '''Calendargate''' controversy among ] developed in December 2023 after the release of a 2024 calendar featuring photographs of |
||
], ], and ] criticized it for its display of public sexuality. More ] and ] sided in favor of the calendar against the criticism, describing it as overly puritanical and censorious. Observers from that side of the political spectrum cited the controversy as reflecting continued tension between the two factions that had united to support former president ] in his re-election bid.{{Citation needed|date=March 2024}} | |||
The controversy was seen as dividing the two largest elements of the political coalition supporting ]'s ] later that year. Liberal observers who commented saw the controversy as reflecting a fundamental contradiction in the coalition's underlying beliefs that the calendar's critics, knew needed to be resolved for future political success; while its supporters saw as not mattering, a divide that had been endemic since the two groups joined forces behind Trump.<ref name="Kevin Drum">{{cite web|last=Drum|first=Kevin|authorlink=Kevin Drum|title=Calendargate is splitting the right|url=https://jabberwocking.com/calendargate-is-splitting-the-right/|website=jabberwocking.com|date=January 10, 2024|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Amanda Marcotte">{{cite news|last=Marcotte|first=Amanda|authorlink=Amanda Marcotte|title=Why Evangelicals are raging about Ultra Right Beer's sexy anti-woke calendar|url=https://www.salon.com/2024/01/12/magas-sexy-beer-calendar-scandal-cracks-up-the-christian-right/|newspaper=]|date=January 12, 2024|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref> | |||
==Background== | |||
Earlier in 2023, conservatives angry that ] had hired ] ] ] as a ] for ] launched ] that hurt the brand's sales enough to cost it the position of America's bestselling beer, which it had held since 2001.<ref name="NYT Bud Light story">{{cite news|last=Moreno|first=J. Edward|title=How a Mexican Lager Quietly Rose to Become America's Best-Selling Beer|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/23/business/modelo-bud-light.html|newspaper=]|date=July 23, 2023|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Star-Advertiser story">{{cite news|last=Durbin|first=Dee-Ann|title=Bud Light, top U.S. seller since 2001, loses sales crown|url=https://www.staradvertiser.com/2023/06/14/breaking-news/bud-light-top-u-s-seller-since-2001-loses-sales-crown/|newspaper=]|via=]|date=June 14, 2023|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref> Conservatives had previously mostly eschewed organized boycotts of consumer products over political issues, a tactic more commonly associated with political progressives, and had never succeeded as they appeared to have done with Bud Light. They thus felt empowered to find new ways of challenging corporate America, which despite its traditional preference for government by the ] had been increasingly criticized by conservatives as "]", catering to racial and sexual minorities in the effort to broaden their customer bases. Many conservatives focused on creating alternative brands to popular ones that they saw as too closely associated with causes and organizations they identified with the political left.<ref name="The Hill brands story">{{cite news|last=Shapero|first=Julia|title=Conservative companies create parallel economy as polarization thrives|url=https://thehill.com/business/4247848-conservative-companies-create-parallel-economy-as-polarization-thrives/|newspaper=]|date=October 18, 2023|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Vox article" /> | |||
In April 2023, as conservative anger towards Bud Light grew, Seth Weathers, under the name Conservative Dad, launched Ultra Right Beer, brewed in ], as an alternative. Within two weeks he reported over $1 million from sales of 20,000 six-packs. "This is more than a beer company, it's a movement of people who are speaking up and saying no", he said, urging conservatives to not buy any ] products again. "This behavior from Big Corporate will never end until conservatives hold the line."<ref name="Ultra Right Beer launch">{{cite news|last=Spady|first=Aubrie|title='Ultra Right' conservative beer expected to hit $1M in sales since Bud Light boycotts: 'It's a movement'|url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/ultra-right-conservative-beer-expected-1m-sales-bud-light-boycotts-movement|newspaper=]|date=April 26, 2023|access-date=February 13, 2024}}</ref> | |||
==Calendar== | ==Calendar== | ||
Earlier in 2023, conservatives were angry that ] had hired trans woman influencer ] as a ] for ] launched ]. In April 2023, Seth Weathers, under the name Conservative Dad, launched Ultra Right Beer, brewed in ], as an alternative. Within two weeks, he reported over $1 million from sales of 20,000 six-packs.<ref name="Vox article" /> | |||
In early December Ultra Right offered as ] on its website "Conservative Dad's <u>''Real''</u> Women of America 2024 Calendar |
In early December 2023, Ultra Right offered as ] on its website "Conservative Dad's <u>''Real''</u> Women of America 2024 Calendar". It featured pictures of women known as conservative commentators, ]s, and activists in ] poses, many of which in minimal attire.{{efn|Loesch is wearing a T-shirt, jeans and lifting an ] in each arm}} One of the images featured conservative comedian Ashley St. Clair wearing a black bra and pearl necklace while sitting in a ], an apparent reference to one of Mulvaney's Bud Light videos.<ref name="Mediaite piece">{{cite news|last=Frevele|first=Jamie|title='Conservative Dad's' Calendar Featuring Scantily Clad Riley Gaines and Other Sexy Pics Sparks Outrage on Right|url=https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/conservative-dads-calendar-featuring-scantily-clad-riley-gaines-and-other-sexy-pics-sparks-outrage-on-right/|newspaper=]|date=December 28, 2023|access-date=February 16, 2024}}</ref> Ultra Right said that 10% of the calendar's sales would go to the ] Center to "protect women's sports from extreme leftist ideology seeking to destroy real women".<ref name="Daily Dot" /> | ||
==Reaction== | |||
The website described the calendar as "a celebration of conservative women who are fighting woke extremist to preserve real women". Weathers clarified that the calendar's message was ] in a statement beginning with an apparent denial. "This calendar is in no way intended to discredit transwomen ... because there is no such thing as a 'transwoman'", he told ].<ref name="Fox Business calendar story">{{cite web|last=Schoffstall|first=Joe|title=Anti-woke beer company teams up with Riley Gaines to launch 'Real women of America' calendar|url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/anti-woke-beer-company-teams-up-riley-gaines-launch-real-women-america-calendar|newspaper=]|date=December 6, 2023|access-date=February 14, 2023}}</ref> It was noted that one of the images featured conservative comedian Ashley St. Clair wearing a black bra and pearl necklace while sitting in a ], an apparent reference to one of Mulvaney's Bud Light videos.<ref name="Black Tea News">{{cite news|last=Barr|first=Christina L.|title=Why There's Conservative Drama Over #Calendargate|url=https://www.blackteanews.com/columns/2024/1/1/why-theres-drama-over-conservativegate|newspaper=Black Tea News|date=January 1, 2024|access-date=February 14, 2024}}</ref><ref name="Mediaite piece">{{cite news|last=Frevele|first=Jamie|title='Conservative Dad's' Calendar Featuring Scantily Clad Riley Gaines and Other Sexy Pics Sparks Outrage on Right|url=https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/conservative-dads-calendar-featuring-scantily-clad-riley-gaines-and-other-sexy-pics-sparks-outrage-on-right/|newspaper=]|date=December 28, 2023|access-date=February 16, 2024}}</ref> | |||
Some conservative commentators reacted negatively in a vigorous online debate later that month around the ] holidays,<ref name="Vox article" /> criticizing it as ],<ref name="Mediaite piece" /><ref name="Daily Dot">{{cite news|last=Ettinger|first=Marlon|title=Conservative Dad's 'Real Women of America' pin-up calendar divides the online right|url=https://www.dailydot.com/debug/conservative-dad-pinup-calendar-ultra-right-beer/|newspaper=]|date=December 28, 2023|access-date=February 19, 2024}}</ref> even calling it "demonic".<ref name="Vox article" /><ref name="Hochman essay"/> Former Trump attorney ] responded to another tweet mocking Gaines for posing so suggestively for the calendar after having cited fears of locker-room voyeurism to justify excluding trans women from sports. She wrote: "This is the problem with conservatives who think they can act just like the secular world. If conservatives aren't morally grounded Christians, what are we even 'conserving'?"<ref name="Vox article" /> | |||
Commentators who supported the calendar not only described social conservatives as being prudish but saw it as also taking a stand against homosexuality. ] co-founder ] called the controversy "literally gay" and added: "You're allowed to enjoy looking at sexy, beautiful women. It's healthy and normal. Grow up." Scott Greer, a former editor at '']'', wrote that "he outrage over the tacky conservative dad calendar proves that the chief enemy for some conservative women is male sexuality. There is a reason why so many of them marry closet cases." One commenter, quoted in '']'', argued that the controversy showed that "he ] doesn’t want a world without a tyrannical priest class ... they just want to replace the femminist-nuerotic-flamboyant priest class with their own alliance of the bowtied, resentful, and closeted."<ref name="Daily Dot" /> | |||
==Controversy== | |||
==Subsequent analysis, commentary, and opinion== | |||
The day after the calendar was released, conservative Christian author and filmmaker ] condemned it on Twitter. Calling it "DISGUSTING and DEGENERATE", he said it made conservatives who claimed to be "'anti-porn' and 'anti-]'" look hypocritical. "I HATE the Conservative movement!"<ref name="First Kilgore tweet">{{cite tweet|user=EvanAKilgore|number=1733223154917503334|title=The 'Conservative Dad's Real Women of America' calendar is DISGUSTING and DEGENERATE ...}}</ref> | |||
===From conservatives=== | |||
'']'' columnist Madeline Kearns observed that the calendar laid bare a faultline among conservatives regarding sexuality in culture: "Either the sexual revolution was fun and games until a bunch of overzealous feminists and LGBT activists ruined it, or the sexual revolution was doomed from the start and the '90s-style smut found in advertising, movies, and calendars isn't much removed from our present degradation." She took the latter position, that conservatives should seek the restoration of "a courtship culture, one that emphasizes male and female sexual complementarity, abstinence before marriage, fidelity within it, openness to the gift of children, as well as the cultivation of a culture in which beauty is prized over the vulgar and obscene."<ref name="NRO piece">{{cite news|last=Kearns|first=Madeline|title=On Right-Wing Smut|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/01/on-right-wing-smut/|newspaper=]|date=January 1, 2024|access-date=February 19, 2024}}</ref> | |||
At another conservative publication, '']'', Tiana Lowe Doescher took the opposite viewpoint, calling the calendar "anodyne and innocuous at worst ... PG-13 and tolerably cringe". The debate it provoked was likewise "the dumbest possible online nontroversy". She chided critics calling it pornographic, noting that conservatives had largely won their political and cultural battle over sexually explicit material online, at least as far as restricting minors' access to it. "#Calendargate is a dud for the conservative movement, and on a personal level, it reeks of simple internalized sexism, as though women's bodies should be shrouded rather than celebrated."<ref name="Washington Examiner">{{cite news|last=Doescher|first=Tiana Loewe|title=The conservative pin-up calendar is harmless kitsch, not pornography|url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/?p=2708866|newspaper=]|date=December 28, 2023|access-date=February 19, 2024}}</ref> | |||
Nate Hochman, a conservative writer and activist, who had in 2021 defended ]'s controversial decision to rescind porn star ]'s invitation to appear at their conference,<ref name="American Mind">{{cite web|last=Hochman|first=Nate|title=No, Porn Stars Are Not Conservative|url=https://americanmind.org/salvo/no-porn-stars-are-not-conservative/|website=The American Mind|publisher=]|date=July 26, 2021|access-date=February 21, 2024}}</ref>{{relevance inline|date=March 2024}} found fault with both sides in an essay about the controversy in '']'', a ] publication. He wrote: "In the abstract, calendars with pictures of women in bikinis aren't much to write home about" but that what he found "exceptionally off-putting" about the Real Women of America calendar—"a ham-handed right-wing effort to be hip"—was that it had been created by and for conservatives. He explained: "It's difficult not to feel a certain number of secondhand embarrassment for everyone involved." At the same time, Hochman wrote, "the calendar's critics ... veered into much more bizarre territory", in particular proposing instead that it show conservative women either pregnant or attending to children, "somehow an even more disconcerting concept".<ref name="Hochman essay">{{cite news|last=Hochman|first=Nate|title=Beyond the Calendar Wars|url=https://www.theamericanconservative.com/beyond-the-calendar-wars/|newspaper=]|date=January 1, 2024|access-date=February 21, 2024}}</ref> The underlying problem according to Hochman was conservatives' failure to articulate a vision of what American culture should be, or even a consistent critique of what it was. He explained:<ref name="Hochman essay" />{{blockquote|onservatives no longer have the foggiest idea of what a 'culture' actually is, let alone what it would take to shape one... Instead of creating an authentic counterculture—one that might someday be able to challenge the hegemony of our decaying mainstream institutions—conservatives are locked in a dialectic relationship with the very social norms and mores that they ostensibly seek to overcome.}} | |||
Around the ] holidays at the end of the month, the criticism gave rise to vigorous debate among online conservatives. On December 24, conservative Christian rapper ] commented on ] that the calendar's combination of "half naked women" with Christian imagery was "demonic".<ref name="Gray tweet">{{Cite tweet|user=RealBrysonGray|number=1738794883656057057|title=The fact that conservatives made a calendar with half naked women then decided to put Christian imagery on the photos is demonic}}</ref> He appeared to be referring to its picture of Josie the Redheaded Libertarian, in which she stands in a kitchen wearing a short blue dress with one leg lifted and bent, looking toward the camera while she holds a freshly prepared pie, a pose suggesting a ], with a wooden crucifix conspicuous on the wall behind her.<ref name="Black Tea News" /> Two days later, after the holiday, former Trump attorney ] responded to another tweet mocking Gaines for posing so suggestively for the calendar after having cited fears of locker-room voyeurism to justify excluding transwomen from sports. "This is the problem with conservatives who think they can act just like the secular world," she wrote. "If conservatives aren't morally grounded Christians, what are we even 'conserving'?"<ref name="Ellis tweet">{{cite tweet|user=JennaEllisEsq|number=1740050525410775099|title=This is the problem with conservatives who thi nk they can act just like the secular world. If conservatives aren't morally grounded Christians, what are we even 'conserving'? This whole calendar thing is a no from me, but it's not surprising given the current state of the movement.}}</ref> | |||
===From progressives=== | |||
Podcaster ] posted at length later that day:<ref name="Stuckey tweet">{{cite tweet|user=conservmillen|number=1739839656731017646|title=You can probably guess what I think about a calendar branded for 'conservative dads filled with pictures of women, many of them married and many of them very scantily clad. Hate it ...}}</ref> | |||
The progressive outlet '']'' called Calendargate "deeply revealing about the fault lines inside the conservative movement". Writer Zack Beauchamp identified the conflict as between social conservatives who prioritized "]" while on the other he identified the more ]-leaning "]" ("leave-me-alone bros who resent what they see as censorious political correctness"), a divide he traced back to a 1966 debate between ] and ], with newer postliberals like Missouri senator ] joining the social conservatives in urging a greater role for government. Calendargate "exposes the ways in which the attempts to remake conservatism in the 'anti-woke' era will create new sources of tension inside the conservative camp—and highlights the way this struggle might play out inside conservative cultural spaces."<ref name="Vox article" /> | |||
{{quote|You can probably guess what I think about a calendar branded for "conservative dads" filled with pictures of women, many of them married and many of them very scantily clad. Hate it. I also find the discourse ridiculous, as if we're all supposed to pretend we don't understand the purpose of a calendar of posed, full-body pictures of women. You can call me a prude, puritanical, or jealous of these women's beauty—whatever makes you feel better. I just don't see the value in marketing what's basically, in some photos, soft porn to married (or unmarried) men. Of course these women are gorgeous, and of course I'm all for celebrating true femininity in an age that can't define "woman". In my view, this doesn't accomplish that at all ... I'm aware there may be bigger battles to fight than this. But I happen to know that there are many Christian conservatives who share this same perspective behind the scenes, and I wanted to give them a voice. The polarization between Christian and secular conservatism is only going to grow, my friends, so buckle up!}} | |||
], a defender of the calendar, also noted the division and called on conservatives to unite. "The other side is literally giving tampon sponsorships to chicks with dicks", he wrote. "Can we focus on the actual enemy for once?"<ref name="Pearson tweet">{{cite tweet|user=thecjpearson|number=1739800502701810164|title=Why are conservatives mad about hot conservative women taking PG-13 photos for a calendar? The other side is literally giving tampon sponsorships to chicks with dicks. Can we focus on the actual enemy for once?}}</ref> | |||
At '']'', ] characterized the Barstool faction as having more traditional views of ], "see sex as men's right and women's burden—and childbirth and marriage as ways to trap women into servitude to men", and observed that the social conservatives understood that was "a hard sell outside of their circles" politically. According to Marcotte, Trump's success and their tacit acceptance of his embrace of this viewpoint left them "lying in the bikini photoshoot bed they made for themselves".<ref name="Amanda Marcotte">{{cite news|last=Marcotte|first=Amanda|author-link=Amanda Marcotte|title=Why Evangelicals are raging about Ultra Right Beer's sexy anti-woke calendar|url=https://www.salon.com/2024/01/12/magas-sexy-beer-calendar-scandal-cracks-up-the-christian-right/|newspaper=]|date=January 12, 2024|access-date=February 12, 2024}}</ref> '']'' derived the message of Calendargate to be that "onservatives should be upholding family values like the sanctity of marriage, honoring women, especially the mothers of their children, celebrating 'real' women without objectifying them, but also reiterating the alpha male status that will make America great again."<ref name="Mediaite piece" /> | |||
In a ] hosted by the conservative magazine '']'', ] called the calendar "ultra cringe. I don't think should have been done, and if it was done it shouldn't have been done in this way".<ref name="Human Events tweet">{{cite tweet|user=HumanEvents|number=1740569790127714366|title=@JackPosobiec on Calendargate: 'I do think this is ultra cringe. I don't think that this calendar should have been done, and if it was done it shouldn't have been done in this way.'"}}</ref> Inez Stepman, a fellow at the ], recalled how as a child her parents would decide whether she could see a particular ] film based on whether its quality offset whatever content had led to the rating. "he only comment I'll make on The Calendar is that it fails that test", she said.<ref name="Stepman tweet">{{cite tweet|user=InezFeltscher|number=1740134822251569258|title=When I was a kid my parents decided which R rated movies I was allowed to watch based on whether their merit and quality as films made worthwhile whatever violence/sex/drugs were shown and the only comment I'll make on The Calendar is that it fails that test. The sexuality factor is very tame and low but the quality of the calendar fails to meet even that threshold and so it seems gratuitous. QED.}}</ref> | |||
Progressive journalist ] wrote on his blog: "I only wish that I believed this would become a huge, ongoing fight rather than petering out (so to speak) after a few weeks. But this isn't the kind of thing Fox News will obsess about, so it's unlikely to last." He took no position on the issues involved but, noting that this sort of internal feud was more common on the political left, said it was "nice to see conservatives taking a crack at it. Let's keep it going, OK?"<ref name="Kevin Drum">{{cite web|last=Drum|first=Kevin|author-link=Kevin Drum|title=Calendargate is splitting the right|url=https://jabberwocking.com/calendargate-is-splitting-the-right/|website=Jabberwocking.com|date=January 10, 2024|access-date=February 21, 2024}}</ref> | |||
Responses from those who had no problem with the calendar came in the next day. Critics of the calendar were likened to the ];<ref name="Emmons tweet">{{cite tweet|user=libbyemmons|number=1740187747703541931|title=Call me crazy but I don't think women's modesty needs to be policed. We're not the Taliban.}}</ref> one commenter posted a picture of ] and suggested Gray's condemnation of the calendar showed "just how much he lusted after his grandma".<ref name="Gray ??? retweet">{{cite tweet|user=RealBrysonGray|number=1740482836548010200|title=????}}</ref> Another tweet called the images "beautiful pics tastefully done" compared to the calendars she had seen on the walls of auto repair shops she had frequented with her mechanic father growing up.<ref name="Danelishen tweet">{{cite tweet|user=ChessChick|number=1740426927004115196|title=This is tame af. You know you guys never grew up with a mechanic for a father spending your childhood hanging out in car shops.... and it shows. Beautiful pics tastefully done.}}</ref> Accompanied by the image of a 1990 '']'' cover featuring Trump and a ], ] expressed amazement that many of his fellow Trump supporters "have suddenly found some superior sense of morality over a calendar with well-known conservative women on its pages."<ref name="Prather tweet">{{cite tweet|user=WatchChad|number=1740038890608861389|title=Amazing how many people that voted Trump in '16 and '20 (like me), and some who plan to in '24 (also like me), have suddenly found some superior sense of morality over a calendar with well-known conservative women on its pages.}}</ref> Later, ] co-founder ] called the controversy "literally gay. You're allowed to enjoy looking at sexy, beautiful women. It's healthy and normal. Grow up."<ref name=McInnes tweet">{{cite tweet|user=XGavinMcInnes|number=1741173275697266820|title=The controversy around this sexy conservative calendar is literally gay. You're allowed to enjoy looking at sexy, beautiful women. It's healthy and normal. Grow up.}}</ref> ] producer Peyton Drew posted additional pictures from the shoot in response.<ref name="Drew tweet">{{cite tweet|user=peytondreww|number=1740458625418813553|title=Oops. So scandalous 🤭 | Another photo from my set for @ultrarightbeer calendar coming right up to trigger you 😘 #CalendarGate #MissJanuary 🇺🇸 @sethweathers why do you objectify us like this?! 😂}}</ref> | |||
'']'' writer Magdalene Taylor took note of a video Isabella Marie DeLuca, another young conservative influencer, had posted in October of herself baking a cake that had drawn fresh attention after Calendargate. In the video, her breasts under her T-shirt are prominent while she bakes. It does not focus on them nor otherwise draw attention to them but some commentators suggested DeLuca was drawing attention to "the spectacle of those giant ta tas" anyway, or that they expected her to add a link to her supposed ] page. She said that the labeling of that content as well as the calendar images as "pornographic", despite the minimal sexual aspect, showed how pervasive pornography was in modern culture. She added: " really does increasingly dictate how we view the world, and many now broadly define porn as anything that seeks our attention. .. By calling everything porn, we're not really making any sort of point. We're just making more porn."<ref name="Vice story">{{cite news|last=Taylor|first=Magdalene|title=Nobody Knows What Porn Is Anymore|url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/93kmjz/porn-brain-social-media|newspaper=]|date=January 5, 2024|access-date=February 21, 2024}}</ref> | |||
Josie took some of the criticism personally, sometimes commenting on how her female critics were dressed in photos. On ], she responded to ] host ]'s saying "nothing about this calendar is Christian or conservative" by writing "Too much cleavage for a moral Christian girl" over a headshot of Perez in front of a microphone.<ref name="Josie Christmas tweet">{{cite tweet|user=TRHLofficial|number=1739441636000559586|title=Shot Chaser}}</ref> "Oh spare me your righteous indignation, Jenna", she wrote on the morning of December 28, contrasting her calendar photo with an image of Ellis in a tight pink dress in front of a movie poster for '']''. "I am wearing more layers than you."<ref name="Josie first tweet">{{cite tweet|user=TRHLofficial|number=1740367618601898177|title=Oh spare me your righteous indignation, Jenna. I am wearing more layers than you.}}</ref> Two hours later Josie said she did not mind that her response increased Ellis's ]: "She needs that ad revenue money to start paying back all those people she took money from."<ref name="Josie second tweet">{{cite tweet|user=TRHLofficial|number=1740389297197375702|title=I'm OK giving Jenna Ellis engagements. She needs that ad revenue money to start paying back all those people she took money from.}}</ref> After she speculated that the real reason for objections to her calendar photo was not so much that she was in it but that she was attractive, noting that she had the same bodily measurements as ], another interlocutor noted that degree of self-absorption was exactly what critics were objecting to.<ref name="Black Tea News" /> "Your wife got you wanking it to my calendar page didn't she", Josie responded.<ref name="Josie third tweet">{{cite tweet||user=TRHLofficial|number=1739804289424408801|title=This just got personal ... Your wife got you wanking it to my calendar page didn't she}}</ref> | |||
Weathers weighed in as well. Responding to a tweet where it was suggested that "if more wives tried to look like the women in the calendar...maybe their marriages would be a little better", he extended that to both sexes. "Imagine the improved marriages if people's take on #CalendarGate was to join the gym so they'd be sexually appealing for their spouses?" he asked. "Our country is obese. Stop bitching about people who have worked hard for their bodies & join a gym to get your own!"<ref name="Weathers tweet">{{cite tweet|user=sethweathers|number=1740407619179688415|title=This calendar should motivate men & women to get healthy & in shape! ...}}</ref> He later posted a ] video on the subject from ], in which the former congressman praised the calendar as "fabulous", urged everyone watching to buy at least two, said he would buy 50 and called its critics "delusional".<ref name="Weathers Santos tweet">{{cite tweet|user=sethweathers|number=1740209636404527106|title=We have the final authority weighing in on #CalendarGate}}</ref> | |||
After Posobiec hosted a three-hour Spaces where he, Gray, Josie, St. Clair and Weathers debated the issue,<ref name="Second Spaces">{{cite web|title=Blood on the Snow, CalendarGate Debate|url=https://spacesdashboard.com/space/1lDxLPwvOymxm/blood-on-the-snow-calendargate-debate|website=]|date=December 27, 2023|access-date=February 18, 2023}}</ref> social conservatives began responding again, sharing how alienating the criticism was. "It really made me realize the 'Conservative Movement' isn't for me much longer", Kilgore said afterwards. "It's all a massive grift and these people laugh at Christians with traditional values."<ref name="Kilgore second tweet">{{cite tweet|user=EvanAKilgore|number=1740171363527066111|title=The Space debating the Conservative Dad Calendar with @JackPosobiec@sethweathers@RealBrysonGray@stclairashley@TRHLofficial and others really made me realize the 'Conservative Movement' isn't for me much longer. It's all a massive grift and these people laugh at Christians with traditional values.}}</ref> He later characterized the discussion as the other four "criticiz, laugh at him, and deflect/] all evening??" rather than addressing his core criticism.<ref name="Kilgore third tweet">{{cite tweet|user=EvanAKilgore|number=1740226113337786432|title=Did a single person give a solid Biblical refute to @RealBrysonGray calling the calendar demonic.. or did everyone just criticize him, laugh at him, and deflect/virtue-signal all evening??}}</ref> The next day he reported that St. Clair, whom he had considered a friend, had blocked him.<ref name="Kilgore fourth tweet">{{cite tweet|user=EvanAKilgore|number=1740457832665977331|title=Last week you were running up to me in the hotel at a political event screaming 'EVANNN!!!' and gave me a big hug. This week, you're blocking me bc I opposed a calendar I morally disagreed with and interacted with some tweets condemning past behaviors. Dang. 🥲}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|Conservatism|United States}} | |||
*] | *] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Line 52: | Line 43: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 06:15, 4 December 2024
2023 controversy among US conservatives
The Calendargate controversy among American conservatives developed in December 2023 after the release of a 2024 calendar featuring photographs of female conservative activists and commentators, several of whom wore revealing clothing. Debates online among conservatives, including some of the women who had posed for the calendar, continued on social media websites into 2024.
Social conservatives, evangelicals, and postliberals criticized it for its display of public sexuality. More libertarians and barstool conservatives sided in favor of the calendar against the criticism, describing it as overly puritanical and censorious. Observers from that side of the political spectrum cited the controversy as reflecting continued tension between the two factions that had united to support former president Donald Trump in his re-election bid.
Calendar
Earlier in 2023, conservatives were angry that AB InBev had hired trans woman influencer Dylan Mulvaney as a brand ambassador for Bud Light launched a boycott. In April 2023, Seth Weathers, under the name Conservative Dad, launched Ultra Right Beer, brewed in Gwinnett County, Georgia, as an alternative. Within two weeks, he reported over $1 million from sales of 20,000 six-packs.
In early December 2023, Ultra Right offered as merchandise on its website "Conservative Dad's Real Women of America 2024 Calendar". It featured pictures of women known as conservative commentators, influencers, and activists in pin-up poses, many of which in minimal attire. One of the images featured conservative comedian Ashley St. Clair wearing a black bra and pearl necklace while sitting in a bubble bath, an apparent reference to one of Mulvaney's Bud Light videos. Ultra Right said that 10% of the calendar's sales would go to the Riley Gaines Center to "protect women's sports from extreme leftist ideology seeking to destroy real women".
Reaction
Some conservative commentators reacted negatively in a vigorous online debate later that month around the Christmas holidays, criticizing it as lustful, even calling it "demonic". Former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis responded to another tweet mocking Gaines for posing so suggestively for the calendar after having cited fears of locker-room voyeurism to justify excluding trans women from sports. She wrote: "This is the problem with conservatives who think they can act just like the secular world. If conservatives aren't morally grounded Christians, what are we even 'conserving'?"
Commentators who supported the calendar not only described social conservatives as being prudish but saw it as also taking a stand against homosexuality. Proud Boys co-founder Gavin McInnes called the controversy "literally gay" and added: "You're allowed to enjoy looking at sexy, beautiful women. It's healthy and normal. Grow up." Scott Greer, a former editor at The Daily Caller, wrote that "he outrage over the tacky conservative dad calendar proves that the chief enemy for some conservative women is male sexuality. There is a reason why so many of them marry closet cases." One commenter, quoted in The Daily Dot, argued that the controversy showed that "he movement conservative doesn’t want a world without a tyrannical priest class ... they just want to replace the femminist-nuerotic-flamboyant priest class with their own alliance of the bowtied, resentful, and closeted."
Subsequent analysis, commentary, and opinion
From conservatives
National Review Online columnist Madeline Kearns observed that the calendar laid bare a faultline among conservatives regarding sexuality in culture: "Either the sexual revolution was fun and games until a bunch of overzealous feminists and LGBT activists ruined it, or the sexual revolution was doomed from the start and the '90s-style smut found in advertising, movies, and calendars isn't much removed from our present degradation." She took the latter position, that conservatives should seek the restoration of "a courtship culture, one that emphasizes male and female sexual complementarity, abstinence before marriage, fidelity within it, openness to the gift of children, as well as the cultivation of a culture in which beauty is prized over the vulgar and obscene."
At another conservative publication, The Washington Examiner, Tiana Lowe Doescher took the opposite viewpoint, calling the calendar "anodyne and innocuous at worst ... PG-13 and tolerably cringe". The debate it provoked was likewise "the dumbest possible online nontroversy". She chided critics calling it pornographic, noting that conservatives had largely won their political and cultural battle over sexually explicit material online, at least as far as restricting minors' access to it. "#Calendargate is a dud for the conservative movement, and on a personal level, it reeks of simple internalized sexism, as though women's bodies should be shrouded rather than celebrated."
Nate Hochman, a conservative writer and activist, who had in 2021 defended Turning Point USA's controversial decision to rescind porn star Brandi Love's invitation to appear at their conference, found fault with both sides in an essay about the controversy in The American Conservative, a paleoconservative publication. He wrote: "In the abstract, calendars with pictures of women in bikinis aren't much to write home about" but that what he found "exceptionally off-putting" about the Real Women of America calendar—"a ham-handed right-wing effort to be hip"—was that it had been created by and for conservatives. He explained: "It's difficult not to feel a certain number of secondhand embarrassment for everyone involved." At the same time, Hochman wrote, "the calendar's critics ... veered into much more bizarre territory", in particular proposing instead that it show conservative women either pregnant or attending to children, "somehow an even more disconcerting concept". The underlying problem according to Hochman was conservatives' failure to articulate a vision of what American culture should be, or even a consistent critique of what it was. He explained:
onservatives no longer have the foggiest idea of what a 'culture' actually is, let alone what it would take to shape one... Instead of creating an authentic counterculture—one that might someday be able to challenge the hegemony of our decaying mainstream institutions—conservatives are locked in a dialectic relationship with the very social norms and mores that they ostensibly seek to overcome.
From progressives
The progressive outlet Vox called Calendargate "deeply revealing about the fault lines inside the conservative movement". Writer Zack Beauchamp identified the conflict as between social conservatives who prioritized "traditional values" while on the other he identified the more libertarian-leaning "Barstool conservatives" ("leave-me-alone bros who resent what they see as censorious political correctness"), a divide he traced back to a 1966 debate between William F. Buckley Jr. and Hugh Hefner, with newer postliberals like Missouri senator Josh Hawley joining the social conservatives in urging a greater role for government. Calendargate "exposes the ways in which the attempts to remake conservatism in the 'anti-woke' era will create new sources of tension inside the conservative camp—and highlights the way this struggle might play out inside conservative cultural spaces."
At Salon, Amanda Marcotte characterized the Barstool faction as having more traditional views of patriarchy, "see sex as men's right and women's burden—and childbirth and marriage as ways to trap women into servitude to men", and observed that the social conservatives understood that was "a hard sell outside of their circles" politically. According to Marcotte, Trump's success and their tacit acceptance of his embrace of this viewpoint left them "lying in the bikini photoshoot bed they made for themselves". Mediaite derived the message of Calendargate to be that "onservatives should be upholding family values like the sanctity of marriage, honoring women, especially the mothers of their children, celebrating 'real' women without objectifying them, but also reiterating the alpha male status that will make America great again."
Progressive journalist Kevin Drum wrote on his blog: "I only wish that I believed this would become a huge, ongoing fight rather than petering out (so to speak) after a few weeks. But this isn't the kind of thing Fox News will obsess about, so it's unlikely to last." He took no position on the issues involved but, noting that this sort of internal feud was more common on the political left, said it was "nice to see conservatives taking a crack at it. Let's keep it going, OK?"
Vice writer Magdalene Taylor took note of a video Isabella Marie DeLuca, another young conservative influencer, had posted in October of herself baking a cake that had drawn fresh attention after Calendargate. In the video, her breasts under her T-shirt are prominent while she bakes. It does not focus on them nor otherwise draw attention to them but some commentators suggested DeLuca was drawing attention to "the spectacle of those giant ta tas" anyway, or that they expected her to add a link to her supposed OnlyFans page. She said that the labeling of that content as well as the calendar images as "pornographic", despite the minimal sexual aspect, showed how pervasive pornography was in modern culture. She added: " really does increasingly dictate how we view the world, and many now broadly define porn as anything that seeks our attention. .. By calling everything porn, we're not really making any sort of point. We're just making more porn."
See also
Notes
- Loesch is wearing a T-shirt, jeans and lifting an assault rifle in each arm
References
- ^ Beauchamp, Zack (January 10, 2024). "How a horny beer calendar sparked a conservative civil war". Vox. Vox Media. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
- ^ Frevele, Jamie (December 28, 2023). "'Conservative Dad's' Calendar Featuring Scantily Clad Riley Gaines and Other Sexy Pics Sparks Outrage on Right". Mediaite. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
- ^ Ettinger, Marlon (December 28, 2023). "Conservative Dad's 'Real Women of America' pin-up calendar divides the online right". The Daily Dot. Retrieved February 19, 2024.
- ^ Hochman, Nate (January 1, 2024). "Beyond the Calendar Wars". The American Conservative. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
- Kearns, Madeline (January 1, 2024). "On Right-Wing Smut". National Review Online. Retrieved February 19, 2024.
- Doescher, Tiana Loewe (December 28, 2023). "The conservative pin-up calendar is harmless kitsch, not pornography". The Washington Examiner. Retrieved February 19, 2024.
- Hochman, Nate (July 26, 2021). "No, Porn Stars Are Not Conservative". The American Mind. Claremont Institute. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
- Marcotte, Amanda (January 12, 2024). "Why Evangelicals are raging about Ultra Right Beer's sexy anti-woke calendar". Salon.com. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
- Drum, Kevin (January 10, 2024). "Calendargate is splitting the right". Jabberwocking.com. Retrieved February 21, 2024.
- Taylor, Magdalene (January 5, 2024). "Nobody Knows What Porn Is Anymore". Vice. Retrieved February 21, 2024.