Misplaced Pages

William Remington: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:30, 24 February 2024 editNeverDoING (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,536 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:59, 19 January 2025 edit undoThe-dansker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,272 edits AftermathTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{About|the economist|the athlete and bishop|William Remington (athlete)}} {{About|the economist|the athlete and bishop|William Remington (athlete)}}
{{Infobox person {{Infobox person
| image =William Walter Remington.png | image = William Walter Remington.png
| image_size = | image_size =
| caption = Remington testifying before a Senate committee in 1948 | caption = Remington testifying before a Senate committee in 1948
Line 12: Line 12:
| death_cause = ] | death_cause = ]
| education = ] (1939)<br>] (1940) | education = ] (1939)<br>] (1940)
| employer = ] (1936-1937)<br>] (1940-1941)<br>] (1947-1948) | employer = ] (1936–1937)<br>] (1940-1941)<br>] (1947–1948)
| occupation = | occupation =
| title = | title =
Line 19: Line 19:
* Jane Alben * Jane Alben
}} }}
| parents = Lillian Maude Sutherland (1888-?) <br>Frederick C. Remington (1870-1956) | parents = Lillian Maude Sutherland (1888–1969) <br>Frederick C. Remington (1870–1956)
}} }}


'''William Walter Remington''' (1917&ndash;1954) was an American ] who was employed in various federal government positions for the United States. His career was interrupted by accusations of ] made by ], a ] spy and defector. '''William Walter Remington''' (1917&ndash;1954) was an American ] who was employed in various United States government positions. His career was interrupted by accusations of Communist ] made by ], a ] spy and defector.


Remington was tried twice on different charges. He was convicted of ] in connection with these charges in 1953. He was sentenced to three years in federal prison. He was murdered in Lewisburg prison in November 1954.<ref> Remington was tried twice and convicted twice. The first conviction was set aside on legal grounds, but the second conviction, in 1953 on two counts of ], was upheld. He was sentenced to three years in federal prison. In November 1954, he was murdered in his cell by fellow inmates at ].<ref>
{{cite book {{cite book
| last = Schrecker | last = Schrecker
| first = Ellen | first = Ellen
| author-link = Ellen Schrecker | author-link = Ellen Schrecker
| year = 1998 | year = 1998
Line 34: Line 34:
| publisher = ] | publisher = ]
| isbn = 0-316-77470-7 | isbn = 0-316-77470-7
| page = 361 | page = 361
}}</ref> }}</ref>


==Background== ==Background==
William Walter Remington was born on October 25, 1917, in ]. He was raised in ", '']'', November 25, 1954.</ref> by parents Lillian Maude Sutherland (1888-1969) and Frederick C. Remington (1870–1956).<ref>] for ]</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last =Ogden | first =David | title =Cold War Science and the Body Politic | url =http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/literature_and_medicine/v019/19.2ogden.html }}</ref> His father worked for the ];<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Two Pictures |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,888975,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123165106/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,888975,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 23, 2010 |magazine=] |date= February 5, 1951|access-date=2008-06-07 }}</ref> his mother was an art teacher in ].<ref name=NYT19541125/> William Walter Remington was born on October 25, 1917, in ]. He was raised in ],<ref name=NYT19541125>{{cite news |newspaper=] |date=25 November 1954 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/25/archives/remington-denied-link-to-red-spies-former-federal-economist-was.html |url-access=limited |title=Remington Denied Link to Red Spies. Former Federal Economist Was Serving 3-Year Term on Perjury Charges. }}</ref> by parents Lillian Maude Sutherland (1888-1969) and Frederick C. Remington (1870–1956).<ref>] for ]</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last =Ogden | first =David | title=Cold War Science and the Body Politic |url-access=limited |url=https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/20260 |journal=] |volume=19 |number=2 |date=Fall 2000 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |pages=241–261}}</ref> His father worked for the ];<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Two Pictures |magazine=] |date= February 5, 1951|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,888975,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123165106/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,888975,00.html |archive-date=November 23, 2010|access-date=2008-06-07 }}</ref> his mother was an art teacher in ].<ref name=NYT19541125/>


Remington was admitted to ] at age 16, graduating ] and ] in 1939,. He earned a ] from ] in 1940.<ref name=NYT19541125/><ref name=time>{{cite magazine |title=Death Among Thieves |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820921,00.html?promoid=googlep |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024105811/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820921,00.html?promoid=googlep |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 24, 2012 |magazine=] |access-date=2008-05-11 | date=December 6, 1954}}</ref> Coming from a branch of the wealthy Remington family of ], Remington's parents were demanding. Remington distinguished himself in school. He was admitted to ] at age 16, graduating ] and ] in 1939. He then earned a ] from ] in 1940.<ref name=NYT19541125/><ref name=time>{{cite magazine |title=Death Among Thieves |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 24, 2012 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820921,00.html?promoid=googlep |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121024105811/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820921,00.html?promoid=googlep |magazine=] |access-date=2008-05-11 | date=December 6, 1954}}</ref> Coming from a branch of the wealthy Remington family (from ] in the ]), Remington's parents were demanding.


The son developed a somewhat unconventional and flamboyant personality. From an early age, he was drawn to radical leftist politics, and declared to his friends when he was 15 that he was a Communist. During the Depression, numerous intellectuals were drawn to communism. In college, he became active with members of the ], and later the ]. In later testimony, Remington stated that while he was a ] when he entered college, he "moved left quite rapidly" and became a radical but was never a Communist Party or Young Communist League member at Dartmouth.<ref>, '']'', January 28, 1951. Accessed June 19, 2008. "He went to Dartmouth a Republican but 'moved left quite rapidly' and considered himself a 'radical.' He was not a member of the Communist party or Young Communist League but occasionally told other students in jest that he was a 'bolshevik.'"</ref> Whether or not he ever officially joined the party, later became a point of contention in his legal battles. The son developed a somewhat unconventional and flamboyant personality. From an early age, he was drawn to radical leftist politics, and declared to his friends when he was 15 that he was a Communist. During the Depression, numerous intellectuals were drawn to ]. In college, he befriended members of the ] (YCL) and ] (CPUSA). In subsequent trial testimony, Remington stated that while he was a ] when he entered college, he "moved left quite rapidly" and became a radical but was never a YCL or CPUSA member at Dartmouth.<ref>{{cite news |title=The Nation: Remington on the Stand |newspaper=] |url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1951/01/28/issue.html |url-access=limited |date=28 January 1951 |access-date=19 June 2008 |quote=He went to Dartmouth a Republican but 'moved left quite rapidly' and considered himself a 'radical.' He was not a member of the Communist party or Young Communist League but occasionally told other students in jest that he was a 'bolshevik.'}}</ref> Whether Remington ever officially joined these Communist organizations became a key point of contention in his legal battles.


==Career== ==Career==
After getting his master's degree in economics, Remington was employed in a number of federal civil service posts, principally as an economist: After obtaining his ] in economics, Remington was employed in a number of federal civil service posts, principally as an economist:
*], ], September 1936 to May 1937 *], ], September 1936 to May 1937
* Workers Education Committee, Knoxville, April to August 1937 * Workers Education Committee, Knoxville, April to August 1937
Line 54: Line 54:
*], March 1947 to March 1948<ref name=NYT19480910>Trussell, C. P. , '']'', September 10, 1948. Accessed June 19, 2008.</ref> *], March 1947 to March 1948<ref name=NYT19480910>Trussell, C. P. , '']'', September 10, 1948. Accessed June 19, 2008.</ref>


For his position with the Office of Price Administration, Remington was required to undergo a loyalty-security check, which began in 1941. He admitted having been active in Communist-allied groups such as the ], but denied any sympathy with communism and swore under oath that he was not and had never been a member of the Communist Party. His leftist affiliations raised concerns, but the investigation was superficial and his security clearance was approved.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}} For his position with the Office of Price Administration, Remington was required to undergo a loyalty-security check, which began in 1941. He admitted having been active in Communist-allied groups such as the ], but denied any sympathy with communism and swore under oath that he was not and had never been a member of the Communist Party. Although his leftist affiliations raised concerns, the inquiry was somewhat superficial in nature (despite dragging out for many months), and his security clearance was approved.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|pp=63–64}}</ref>


==Alleged espionage== ==Alleged espionage==
] (here, in 1948) accused Remington of being a member of her Soviet spy network]] ] (here, in 1948) accused Remington of being a member of her Soviet spy network]]
According to later testimony by Remington, the espionage case that would change his life began in 1942 when he and his wife Ann started socializing with ], editor of the Communist publication, '']''. North was an old friend of Ann's mother. On one occasion, North invited Remington to lunch in New York City, at which time Remington was introduced to ], a supposed writer working on a book about war mobilization. Remington had a follow-up meeting with Golos in March 1942, and it was then that Remington was introduced to a woman identified as "Helen Johnson", a researcher helping Golos with his book. Only years later, Remington claimed, did he learn that Helen Johnson was actually ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Cook |first=Fred J. |title=Maverick: Fifty Years of Investigative Reporting |publisher=G.P. Putnam's Sons |location=New York |year=1984 |isbn=0399129936 |page=33 |chapter=Witch-Hunters: The Remington Case}}</ref>
In March 1942 and continuing for two years, Remington had occasional meetings with ] at which he gave her information. This material included data on airplane production and other matters concerning the aircraft industry, as well as some information on an experimental process for manufacturing ].<ref>, '']'', January 8, 1951. Accessed June 1, 2008.</ref> Remington later said that he was unaware that Bentley was connected with the Communist Party, that he believed she was a journalist and researcher, and that the information he gave her was not secret.


On nearly a dozen occasions in 1942 and 1943, Remington met with Bentley and supplied her with information. The two of them would meet alone outside his War Production Board office without a corroborating third person present. She testified that the meetings occurred "on street corners, park benches and in secluded restaurants."{{sfn|Cook|1984|p=32}} In his testimony, Remington said "he had suggested a couple of times that she come to his office, but she always had an excuse for not doing so."{{sfn|Cook|1984|pp=33–34}} The material he gave her included data on U.S. airplane production and other matters pertaining to the aircraft industry, as well as some information on an experimental process for manufacturing ] from garbage.<ref>{{cite magazine |date=8 January 1951 |title=A Woman's Memories |magazine=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123121744/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,805638,00.html |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,805638,00.html |access-date=1 June 2008 |archive-date=23 November 2010}}</ref> Remington later asserted (a) he was unaware "Helen Johnson" was connected with the Communist Party, (b) he believed she was a leftist researcher concerned whether American big business was fully aiding the Soviet war effort against ],{{sfn|Cook|1984|p=33}} and (c) the information he supplied her was publicly available.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Fried |first=Richard M. |title=Review: Liars' Club: The Remington Case |volume=24 |number=1 |date=March 1996 |journal=Reviews in American History |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/30030638 |jstor=30030638 |pages=156–160}} Review of ''Un-American Activities: The Trials of William Remington'' by Gary May.</ref>
But Bentley was a Communist and an espionage agent for the ]. In 1945 she broke with the Communists and became an informer for the ]. She implicated a number of her contacts, including Remington. Bentley's revelations of Soviet espionage activities in the United States received a great deal of press attention. She identified more than 80 Americans—including several employees of government offices—as working for the Soviets, of whom only William Remington was still working in a government position.


But Bentley was a Communist and an espionage agent for the ]. In 1945, she broke with the Communists and became an informer for the ]. She implicated a number of her contacts, including Remington. Bentley's revelations of Soviet espionage activities in the United States received a great deal of press attention. She identified more than 80 Americans—including several employees of government offices—as working for the Soviets, of whom only William Remington was still holding a government position.
Acting on Bentley's information, the FBI began secret surveillance of Remington in late 1945. Remington was by this time disillusioned with communism and had broken off his relationships with radical organizations, so the investigation revealed nothing of interest.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=87}}</ref>
In 1946, Remington was working with the ]. From there he transferred in March 1947 to a position with the ], where he was paid an annual salary of $10,305.<ref name=NYT19480910/> Because the FBI was keeping Bentley's testimony and its investigation of Remington secret, it raised no objection. Remington continued to serve in fairly high-level government posts.


Acting on Bentley's information, the FBI began secret surveillance of Remington in late 1945. He was by this time disillusioned with communism and had broken off his relationships with radical organizations, and so the investigation revealed nothing of interest.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=87}}</ref> In 1946, Remington was working with the ]. From there he transferred in March 1947 to a position with the ], where he was paid an annual salary of $10,305.<ref name=NYT19480910/> Because the FBI was keeping Bentley's testimony and its investigation of Remington secret, it raised no objection to his transfer, and he continued to serve in fairly high-level government posts.
In 1947, Remington was interviewed by the FBI and also questioned before a federal ] in ] about the information he had given to Elizabeth Bentley. He testified that no secret information was involved, and the issue seemed to end there. Remington became an ] ] from this time and for the following year. He sent the FBI information on more than fifty people, only four of whom were connected with his own case. Most of those he named he had never met. He accused them of being Communists, isolationists, Negro nationalists, or "extreme liberals." He also verbally attacked his wife Ann, from whom he had become estranged, and his mother-in-law Elizabeth Moos, both avowed Communists.{{citation needed|date=July 2023}}


In 1947, Remington was interviewed by the FBI and also questioned before a federal ] in ] about the information he had given to Elizabeth Bentley. He testified that no confidential information was involved, and the issue seemed to end there. Remington became an ] ] from this time and for the following year. He sent the FBI information on more than fifty people, only four of whom were connected with his own case. Most of those he named he had never met. He accused them of being Communists, isolationists, Negro nationalists, or "extreme liberals." He also verbally attacked his wife Ann, from whom he had become estranged, and his mother-in-law Elizabeth Moos, both avowed Communists.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=52}}</ref>
Another loyalty investigation of Remington was opened early in 1948. In June, he was relieved of his duties pending the findings of that investigation. In July of that year, the '']'' published a series of articles about Elizabeth Bentley, and the ] opened hearings to investigate her allegations. At these hearings, Bentley made her accusations against Remington public. He denied her allegations. The '']'' described him as "a boob...who was duped by clever Communist agents."{{citation needed|date=July 2023}} At his loyalty review hearings, Remington downplayed his earlier connections with Communist and leftist organizations. He said that his wife's adherence to Communist doctrine was the reason for the end of their marriage.{{citation needed|date=July 2023}}


Another loyalty investigation of Remington was opened early in 1948. In June, he was relieved of his duties pending the findings of that investigation. In July of that year, the '']'' published a series of articles about Elizabeth Bentley, and the ] opened hearings to investigate her allegations. At these hearings, Bentley made her accusations against Remington public. He denied her allegations. The '']'' described him as "a boob...who was duped by clever Communist agents."<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=100}}</ref> At his loyalty review hearings, Remington downplayed his earlier connections with Communist and leftist organizations. He said that his wife's adherence to Communist doctrine was the reason for the end of their marriage.{{citation needed|date=July 2023}}
While testifying before the Senate, Bentley was protected from libel suits. When she repeated her charge that Remington was a Communist on ]'s '']'', he sued her and NBC for libel. At this point, Remington's case acquired considerable notoriety. When Remington's lawyers attempted to subpoena Bentley, she could not be found. Headlines included "RED WITNESS "MISSING" AT 100-G SLANDER SUIT" and the like.{{citation needed|date=July 2023}} When she finally reappeared, she was subpoenaed for the libel suit.


While testifying before the Senate, Bentley was protected from libel suits. When she repeated her charge on ]'s '']'' that Remington was a Communist, he sued her and NBC for libel. At this point, Remington's case acquired considerable notoriety. When Remington's lawyers attempted to subpoena Bentley, she could not be found. Headlines included "RED WITNESS "MISSING" AT 100-G SLANDER SUIT" and the like.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=122}}</ref> When she finally reappeared, she was subpoenaed for the libel suit.
She refused to testify at Remington's loyalty hearing. The ] noted that the only serious evidence against Remington was "the uncorroborated statement of a woman who refuses to submit herself to cross-examination."<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=129}}</ref> It cleared Remington to return to his government post. The libel suit was settled out of court shortly thereafter, with NBC paying Remington $10,000.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Other Voices |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820552,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110131114444/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820552,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 31, 2011 |quote=When ex-Spy Bentley repeated her charge on a television show, Remington sued for $100,000 slander, settled out of court, reportedly for $10,000. |magazine=] |date=May 15, 1950 |access-date=2008-05-31 }}</ref>

She refused to testify at Remington's loyalty hearing. The Loyalty Review Board noted that the only serious evidence against Remington was "the uncorroborated statement of a woman who refuses to submit herself to cross-examination."<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=129}}</ref> It cleared Remington to return to his government post. The libel suit was settled out of court shortly thereafter, with NBC paying Remington $10,000.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Other Voices |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 31, 2011 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820552,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110131114444/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,820552,00.html |quote=When ex-Spy Bentley repeated her charge on a television show, Remington sued for $100,000 slander, settled out of court, reportedly for $10,000. |magazine=] |date=May 15, 1950 |access-date=2008-05-31 }}</ref>


==Second round of investigations== ==Second round of investigations==
] ]
In 1950, the FBI and the federal grand jury in New York City reopened their investigations of Remington, and the ] (HUAC) opened a third. Because of continuing suspicions about him, Remington had been demoted at the Commerce Department. His once-promising career in the Truman administration was stagnant. Ann Remington, now divorced from him, was subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury. She testified that her husband had been a dues-paying member of the Communist Party, and that he had given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley while knowing that Bentley was a Communist.<ref name=remcase>{{cite news |title=The Remington Case; Prosecution's Witness |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1950/12/31/archives/the-remington-case-prosecutions-witness.html |work=] |date=December 31, 1950 |access-date=2008-06-04 }}</ref> A few days later she recanted, and stated that she would claim ] and refuse to testify against her ex-husband in any trial. The grand jury decided to indict Remington for committing perjury when he denied ever being a member of the Communist Party. In 1950, the FBI and the federal grand jury in New York City reopened their investigations of Remington, and the ] (HUAC) opened a third investigation. Because of continuing suspicions about him, Remington had been demoted at the Commerce Department. His once-promising career in the Truman administration was stagnant. Ann Remington, now divorced from him, was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury. She testified that her husband had been a dues-paying member of the Communist Party, and that he had given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley while knowing that Bentley was a Communist.<ref name=remcase>{{cite news |title=The Remington Case; Prosecution's Witness |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1950/12/31/archives/the-remington-case-prosecutions-witness.html |work=] |date=December 31, 1950 |access-date=2008-06-04 }}</ref> A few days later she recanted, and stated that she would claim ] and refuse to testify against her ex-husband in any trial. The grand jury decided to indict Remington for committing perjury when he denied ever being a member of the Communist Party.


==Trials== ==Trials==


===First trial (1950-1951)=== ===First trial (1950-1951)===
Remington's first trial began in late December 1950. ], later to become famous as ]'s chief counsel and already a noted anti-communist, joined the prosecution's legal team. Remington's first trial began in late December 1950. ], later to become famous as ]'s chief counsel and already a noted anti-communist, joined the prosecution's legal team.


<blockquote>"Elizabeth Bentley later supplied a wealth of detail about Remington's involvement with her and the espionage conspiracy. Remington's defense was that he had never handled any classified material, hence could not have given any to Miss Bentley. But she remembered all the facts about the rubber-from-garbage invention. We had searched through the archives and discovered the files on the process. We also found the aircraft schedules, which were set up exactly as she said, and inter office memos and tables of personnel which proved Remington had access to both these items. We also discovered Remington's application for a naval commission in which he specifically pointed out that he was, in his present position with the Commerce Department, entrusted with secret military information involving airplanes, armaments, radar, and the Manhattan Project (the atomic bomb)."<ref>''Roy Cohn,'' McCarthy (1968), page 38</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>"Elizabeth Bentley later supplied a wealth of detail about Remington's involvement with her and the espionage conspiracy. Remington's defense was that he had never handled any classified material, hence could not have given any to Miss Bentley. But she remembered all the facts about the rubber-from-garbage invention. We had searched through the archives and discovered the files on the process. We also found the aircraft schedules, which were set up exactly as she said, and inter office memos and tables of personnel which proved Remington had access to both these items. We also discovered Remington's application for a naval commission in which he specifically pointed out that he was, in his present position with the Commerce Department, entrusted with secret military information involving airplanes, armaments, radar, and the Manhattan Project (the atomic bomb)."<ref>''Roy Cohn,'' McCarthy (1968), page 38</ref></blockquote>
Line 86: Line 87:
During the trial eleven witnesses claimed they knew Remington was a communist. They included Elizabeth Bentley, Ann Remington, Professor Howard Bridgeman of ], Kenneth McConnell, a Communist organizer in Knoxville; Rudolph Bertram and Christine Benson, who worked with him at the Tennessee Valley Authority; and ], who claimed he provided Remington with copies of the southern edition of the communist newspaper, the '']''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://spartacus-educational.com/William_Remington.htm|title=William Remington}}</ref> During the trial eleven witnesses claimed they knew Remington was a communist. They included Elizabeth Bentley, Ann Remington, Professor Howard Bridgeman of ], Kenneth McConnell, a Communist organizer in Knoxville; Rudolph Bertram and Christine Benson, who worked with him at the Tennessee Valley Authority; and ], who claimed he provided Remington with copies of the southern edition of the communist newspaper, the '']''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://spartacus-educational.com/William_Remington.htm|title=William Remington}}</ref>


Ann Moos Remington reversed herself again and testified that her ex-husband had been a Communist Party member and that he had knowingly given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley. Bentley testified, repeating her charge that Remington had given her secret information, saying with regard to the synthetic rubber formula, "He said to me that...he thought that the Russians would need something very much like this."<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=227}}</ref> The prosecution also showed that Remington had handled secret documents that were somewhat similar to the aircraft production information that Bentley said she received from him.{{citation needed|date=May 2021}} Ann Moos Remington reversed herself again and testified that her ex-husband had been a Communist Party member and that he had knowingly given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley. Bentley testified, repeating her charge that Remington had given her secret information, saying with regard to the synthetic rubber formula, "He said to me that...he thought that the Russians would need something very much like this."<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=227}}</ref> The prosecution also showed that Remington had handled secret documents that were somewhat similar to the aircraft production information that Bentley said she received from him.{{citation needed|date=May 2021}}


During the trial, the defense attorneys revealed that John Brunini, the foreman of the grand jury that indicted Remington, had a personal and financial relationship with Elizabeth Bentley and had agreed to co-author a book with her.{{citation needed|date=May 2021}} During the trial, the defense attorneys revealed that John Brunini, the foreman of the grand jury that indicted Remington, had a personal and financial relationship with Elizabeth Bentley and had agreed to co-author a book with her.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|pp=156–157}}</ref>


Remington was convicted after a seven-week trial. Judge Gregory E. Noonan sentenced him to five years, the maximum for perjury. He noted that Remington's act of perjury had involved disloyalty to his country. Remington's conviction was celebrated by many. A '']'' editorial said: "William W. Remington now joins the odiferous list of young Communist punks who wormed their way upward in the Government under the New Deal. He was sentenced to five years in prison, and he should serve every minute of it. In Russia, he would have been shot without trial."<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=267}}</ref> Remington was convicted after a seven-week trial. Judge Gregory E. Noonan sentenced him to five years, the maximum for perjury. He noted that Remington's act of perjury had involved disloyalty to his country. Remington's conviction was celebrated by many. A '']'' editorial said: "William W. Remington now joins the odiferous list of young Communist punks who wormed their way upward in the Government under the New Deal. He was sentenced to five years in prison, and he should serve every minute of it. In Russia, he would have been shot without trial."<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=267}}</ref>


] (here, in 1910) overturned the first trial's verdict against Remington]] ] (here, in 1910) overturned the first trial's verdict against Remington]]
Line 98: Line 99:
The government presented a new indictment, charging Remington with five counts of perjury based on his testimony during the first trial. The charge from the first trial, that he perjured himself when denying he had ever been a Communist Party member, was not included. The government presented a new indictment, charging Remington with five counts of perjury based on his testimony during the first trial. The charge from the first trial, that he perjured himself when denying he had ever been a Communist Party member, was not included.


The second Remington trial began in January 1953 with Judge Vincent L. Leibell presiding. It lasted eight days. The jury found Remington guilty of two counts, for lying when he said he had not given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley and that he did not know of the existence of the Young Communist League, which had a chapter at Dartmouth while Remington was a student there.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Remington Convicted |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,889623,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081222110200/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,889623,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 22, 2008 |magazine=]| date= February 9, 1953 |access-date=2008-05-29 }}</ref> Leibell sentenced Remington to three years in prison.<ref name=Appeal>{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Remington |court=] |date=November 24, 1953 |url=https://www.fastcase.com/Google/Start.aspx?C=9c9e2bbdd854c5b943efab301b1cbcce05234b1faa1fd219&D=cdf46080dab20e2ad8f3c7a284c2920bb2420431fdee35ef }}</ref> The second Remington trial began in January 1953 with Judge Vincent L. Leibell presiding. It lasted eight days. The jury found Remington guilty of two counts, for lying (1) when he said he had not given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley, and (2) when he claimed not to know in college of the existence of the Young Communist League, even though it had a chapter at Dartmouth while he was a student there.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Remington Convicted |magazine=] |date= February 9, 1953 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,889623,00.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 22, 2008 |access-date=2008-05-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081222110200/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,889623,00.html }}</ref> Leibell sentenced Remington to three years in prison.<ref name=Appeal>{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Remington |court=] |date=November 24, 1953 |url=https://www.fastcase.com/Google/Start.aspx?C=9c9e2bbdd854c5b943efab301b1cbcce05234b1faa1fd219&D=cdf46080dab20e2ad8f3c7a284c2920bb2420431fdee35ef }}</ref>


==Imprisonment and murder== ==Imprisonment and murder==
Line 104: Line 105:
While his attorneys prepared another appeal, Remington began his sentence at ]. There he became friends with fellow prisoner, nonviolent action theorist ], before Remington was transferred to Lewisburg. The appeals court upheld the original verdict, and in February 1954, the ] declined to hear the case.<ref name=Appeal/> While his attorneys prepared another appeal, Remington began his sentence at ]. There he became friends with fellow prisoner, nonviolent action theorist ], before Remington was transferred to Lewisburg. The appeals court upheld the original verdict, and in February 1954, the ] declined to hear the case.<ref name=Appeal/>


Among the inmates at Lewisburg was George McCoy, a violent man with an I.Q. of 61. McCoy was known to have made a number of angry remarks about Remington's communism. On the morning of November 22, 1954, McCoy convinced another inmate, 17-year-old juvenile delinquent Lewis Cagle, Jr., to join him in attacking Remington as he slept. Cagle used a piece of brick in a sock as a weapon, striking Remington four times on the head. A third man, Robert Carl Parker, also participated.<ref name=time/> Two days later, November 24, 1954, Remington died of his injuries.<ref>{{cite news |title=Remington Dies in Prison. 2 Inmates Named as Killers. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/25/archives/remington-dies-in-prison-2-inmates-named-as-killers-remington-is.html |newspaper=] |date=November 25, 1954|access-date=2008-05-29 }}</ref> Among the inmates at Lewisburg was George McCoy, a violent man with an I.Q. of 61. McCoy was known to have made a number of angry remarks about Remington's communism. On the morning of November 22, 1954, McCoy convinced another inmate, 17-year-old juvenile delinquent Lewis Cagle, Jr., to join him in attacking Remington as he slept. Cagle used a piece of brick in a sock as a weapon, striking Remington four times on the head. A third man, Robert Carl Parker, also participated.<ref name=time/> Two days later, November 24, 1954, Remington died of his injuries.<ref>{{cite news |title=Remington Dies in Prison. 2 Inmates Named as Killers. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/25/archives/remington-dies-in-prison-2-inmates-named-as-killers-remington-is.html |newspaper=] |date=November 25, 1954|access-date=2008-05-29 }}</ref>


The prison warden described it to Remington's second wife as "not a personal attack against Bill...but just the actions of a couple of hoodlums who got all worked up by...the publicity about Communists."<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=308}}</ref> The ] said that robbery was the motive for the crime.<ref>{{cite news |title=Remington Death Laid To Robbery. 3d Convict Named In Killing. F.B.I. Says He Admitted Looting Victim's Cell. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/27/archives/remington-death-laid-to-robbery-3d-convict-named-in-killing-fbi.html |newspaper=New York Times|date=November 27, 1954|access-date=2008-06-04 | first=William G. | last=Weart}}</ref> His funeral was held in ] on November 28, 1954.<ref>{{cite news |title=Policemen Guard Remington Rites. Six Posted at Jersey Church Because of Threats to Kin of Convict Slain in Prison. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/28/archives/policemen-guard-remington-rites-six-posted-at-jersey-church-because.html |newspaper=] |date=November 28, 1954|access-date=2008-06-04 }}</ref> The prison warden described it to Remington's second wife as "not a personal attack against Bill...but just the actions of a couple of hoodlums who got all worked up by...the publicity about Communists."<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=308}}</ref> The ] said that robbery was the motive for the crime.<ref>{{cite news |title=Remington Death Laid To Robbery. 3d Convict Named In Killing. F.B.I. Says He Admitted Looting Victim's Cell. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/27/archives/remington-death-laid-to-robbery-3d-convict-named-in-killing-fbi.html |newspaper=New York Times|date=November 27, 1954|access-date=2008-06-04 | first=William G. | last=Weart}}</ref> His funeral was held in ] on November 28, 1954.<ref>{{cite news |title=Policemen Guard Remington Rites. Six Posted at Jersey Church Because of Threats to Kin of Convict Slain in Prison. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1954/11/28/archives/policemen-guard-remington-rites-six-posted-at-jersey-church-because.html |newspaper=] |date=November 28, 1954|access-date=2008-06-04 }}</ref>


==Aftermath== ==Aftermath==
Press attention focused on whether more should have been done to protect Remington in prison, and whether his murder was motivated by anti-communism. When Cagle confessed, the FBI instructed him to describe the crime as if he and McCoy had been trying to rob Remington.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=314}}</ref> When McCoy confessed four days later, he said he hated Remington for being a Communist and denied any robbery motive.{{citation needed|date=July 2023}} Press attention focused on whether more should have been done to protect Remington in prison, and whether his murder was motivated by anti-communism. When Cagle confessed, the FBI instructed him to describe the crime as if he and McCoy had been trying to rob Remington.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=314}}</ref> When McCoy confessed four days later, he said he hated Remington for being a Communist and denied any robbery motive.<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|pp=312–318}}</ref>


Worried that Cagle and McCoy's confessions might be ruled inadmissible and afraid that a jury would be sympathetic toward men who murdered a Communist,<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=318}}</ref> U.S. attorney J. Julius Levy later accepted pleas of second degree murder from McCoy, Cagle, and Parker. McCoy and Cagle both received life sentences, while Parker received a 20-year sentence.<ref>{{Cite web |date=1955-05-28 |title=Logansport Pharos Tribune Archives, May 28, 1955, p. 4 |url=https://newspaperarchive.com/logansport-pharos-tribune-may-28-1955-p-4/ |access-date=2023-07-01 |website=NewspaperArchive.com |language=en}}</ref> Worried that Cagle and McCoy's confessions might be ruled inadmissible, and afraid that a jury would be sympathetic toward men who murdered a Communist,<ref>{{Harvnb|May|1994|p=318}}</ref> U.S. attorney J. Julius Levy later accepted pleas of second degree murder from McCoy, Cagle, and Parker. McCoy and Cagle both received life sentences, while Parker received a 20-year sentence.<ref>{{Cite web |date=1955-05-28 |title=Logansport Pharos Tribune Archives, May 28, 1955, p. 4 |url=https://newspaperarchive.com/logansport-pharos-tribune-may-28-1955-p-4/ |access-date=2023-07-01 |website=NewspaperArchive.com |language=en}}</ref>


Remington remained a puzzling figure for Americans who had difficulty understanding how a "golden boy" from a prestigious family could get caught up in espionage. In his memoir, the investigative journalist ] recounted an incident that illustrated the prevailing sentiment of the time. In early 1957, he was approached by ], editor of ''Saga'' magazine:{{blockquote|"Fred, we've been wondering whether you could do a good, in-depth piece for us on William Remington. We'd like to answer the question why a man like Remington from a good family background, a choirboy in his youth, later became a Communist and a spy. It's like the ] case. What motivates such men? We'd like to get some insight into what changes men from such good, solid, conservative backgrounds into Communists and traitors to their country. Do you think you could do that for us?"{{sfn|Cook|1984|p=26}}}}
==Marriage and family==
Remington was married twice. He and Ann Moos had two children, daughter Galeyn and son Bruce, together. They divorced. Moos died in 2015.<ref name=larochelle>, May 5, 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-08.</ref>


==Marriage and family==
His second wife was Jane Alben, and they had a son Neil together. Jane Alben died in 1994.<ref name=larochelle/>
Remington was married twice. He and Ann Moos had two children, Galeyn and Bruce. After he divorced Ann, he married Jane Alben. They had a son Neil together.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://brucelarochelle.wordpress.com/2017/06/06/marker/ |title=Marker |date=6 June 2017 |publisher=brucelarochelle}}</ref>


==Legacy== ==Legacy==
Remington's biographer Gary May concludes:{{blockquote|Clearly, Remington was no political innocent duped by the Communists, and his conviction for perjury seems justified. Yet Remington was no pro-Soviet automaton, no slave to Party or ideology, and not even the FBI, at least privately, was willing to classify him as a Russian spy.<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=321}}</ref>}}
Remington's biographer Gary May concludes:
<blockquote>"Clearly, Remington was no political innocent duped by the Communists, and his conviction for perjury seems justified. Yet Remington was no pro-Soviet automaton, no slave to Party or ideology, and not even the FBI, at least privately, was willing to classify him as a Russian spy."<ref>{{Harvnb|May| 1994 |p=321}}</ref></blockquote>


==See also== ==See also==
Line 131: Line 131:
==External links== ==External links==
* Declassified files * Declassified files
* , 1951 photo of Remington with children * , 1951 photo of Remington with children


==Sources== ==Sources==
Line 154: Line 154:
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 00:59, 19 January 2025

Soviet spy in the United States This article is about the economist. For the athlete and bishop, see William Remington (athlete).
William Remington
Remington testifying before a Senate committee in 1948
BornWilliam Walter Remington
(1917-10-25)October 25, 1917
New York City
DiedNovember 24, 1954(1954-11-24) (aged 37)
Lewisburg Federal Penitentiary
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania
Cause of deathMurder
EducationDartmouth College (1939)
Columbia University (1940)
Employer(s)Tennessee Valley Authority (1936–1937)
National Resources Planning Board (1940-1941)
Council of Economic Advisers (1947–1948)
Spouses
  • Ann Moos
  • Jane Alben
Parent(s)Lillian Maude Sutherland (1888–1969)
Frederick C. Remington (1870–1956)

William Walter Remington (1917–1954) was an American economist who was employed in various United States government positions. His career was interrupted by accusations of Communist espionage made by Elizabeth Bentley, a Soviet spy and defector.

Remington was tried twice and convicted twice. The first conviction was set aside on legal grounds, but the second conviction, in 1953 on two counts of perjury, was upheld. He was sentenced to three years in federal prison. In November 1954, he was murdered in his cell by fellow inmates at Lewisburg prison.

Background

William Walter Remington was born on October 25, 1917, in New York City. He was raised in Ridgewood, New Jersey, by parents Lillian Maude Sutherland (1888-1969) and Frederick C. Remington (1870–1956). His father worked for the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; his mother was an art teacher in New York.

Remington distinguished himself in school. He was admitted to Dartmouth College at age 16, graduating Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude in 1939. He then earned a Master's degree from Columbia University in 1940. Coming from a branch of the wealthy Remington family (from Ilion, New York in the Mohawk Valley), Remington's parents were demanding.

The son developed a somewhat unconventional and flamboyant personality. From an early age, he was drawn to radical leftist politics, and declared to his friends when he was 15 that he was a Communist. During the Depression, numerous intellectuals were drawn to communism. In college, he befriended members of the Young Communist League (YCL) and Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA). In subsequent trial testimony, Remington stated that while he was a Republican when he entered college, he "moved left quite rapidly" and became a radical but was never a YCL or CPUSA member at Dartmouth. Whether Remington ever officially joined these Communist organizations became a key point of contention in his legal battles.

Career

After obtaining his Master's degree in economics, Remington was employed in a number of federal civil service posts, principally as an economist:

For his position with the Office of Price Administration, Remington was required to undergo a loyalty-security check, which began in 1941. He admitted having been active in Communist-allied groups such as the American Peace Mobilization, but denied any sympathy with communism and swore under oath that he was not and had never been a member of the Communist Party. Although his leftist affiliations raised concerns, the inquiry was somewhat superficial in nature (despite dragging out for many months), and his security clearance was approved.

Alleged espionage

Elizabeth Bentley (here, in 1948) accused Remington of being a member of her Soviet spy network

According to later testimony by Remington, the espionage case that would change his life began in 1942 when he and his wife Ann started socializing with Joseph North, editor of the Communist publication, New Masses. North was an old friend of Ann's mother. On one occasion, North invited Remington to lunch in New York City, at which time Remington was introduced to Jacob Golos, a supposed writer working on a book about war mobilization. Remington had a follow-up meeting with Golos in March 1942, and it was then that Remington was introduced to a woman identified as "Helen Johnson", a researcher helping Golos with his book. Only years later, Remington claimed, did he learn that Helen Johnson was actually Elizabeth Bentley.

On nearly a dozen occasions in 1942 and 1943, Remington met with Bentley and supplied her with information. The two of them would meet alone outside his War Production Board office without a corroborating third person present. She testified that the meetings occurred "on street corners, park benches and in secluded restaurants." In his testimony, Remington said "he had suggested a couple of times that she come to his office, but she always had an excuse for not doing so." The material he gave her included data on U.S. airplane production and other matters pertaining to the aircraft industry, as well as some information on an experimental process for manufacturing synthetic rubber from garbage. Remington later asserted (a) he was unaware "Helen Johnson" was connected with the Communist Party, (b) he believed she was a leftist researcher concerned whether American big business was fully aiding the Soviet war effort against Nazi Germany, and (c) the information he supplied her was publicly available.

But Bentley was a Communist and an espionage agent for the Soviet Union. In 1945, she broke with the Communists and became an informer for the FBI. She implicated a number of her contacts, including Remington. Bentley's revelations of Soviet espionage activities in the United States received a great deal of press attention. She identified more than 80 Americans—including several employees of government offices—as working for the Soviets, of whom only William Remington was still holding a government position.

Acting on Bentley's information, the FBI began secret surveillance of Remington in late 1945. He was by this time disillusioned with communism and had broken off his relationships with radical organizations, and so the investigation revealed nothing of interest. In 1946, Remington was working with the Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion. From there he transferred in March 1947 to a position with the President's Council of Economic Advisers, where he was paid an annual salary of $10,305. Because the FBI was keeping Bentley's testimony and its investigation of Remington secret, it raised no objection to his transfer, and he continued to serve in fairly high-level government posts.

In 1947, Remington was interviewed by the FBI and also questioned before a federal grand jury in New York City about the information he had given to Elizabeth Bentley. He testified that no confidential information was involved, and the issue seemed to end there. Remington became an anti-communist informer from this time and for the following year. He sent the FBI information on more than fifty people, only four of whom were connected with his own case. Most of those he named he had never met. He accused them of being Communists, isolationists, Negro nationalists, or "extreme liberals." He also verbally attacked his wife Ann, from whom he had become estranged, and his mother-in-law Elizabeth Moos, both avowed Communists.

Another loyalty investigation of Remington was opened early in 1948. In June, he was relieved of his duties pending the findings of that investigation. In July of that year, the New York World-Telegram published a series of articles about Elizabeth Bentley, and the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations opened hearings to investigate her allegations. At these hearings, Bentley made her accusations against Remington public. He denied her allegations. The Washington Post described him as "a boob...who was duped by clever Communist agents." At his loyalty review hearings, Remington downplayed his earlier connections with Communist and leftist organizations. He said that his wife's adherence to Communist doctrine was the reason for the end of their marriage.

While testifying before the Senate, Bentley was protected from libel suits. When she repeated her charge on NBC Radio's Meet the Press that Remington was a Communist, he sued her and NBC for libel. At this point, Remington's case acquired considerable notoriety. When Remington's lawyers attempted to subpoena Bentley, she could not be found. Headlines included "RED WITNESS "MISSING" AT 100-G SLANDER SUIT" and the like. When she finally reappeared, she was subpoenaed for the libel suit.

She refused to testify at Remington's loyalty hearing. The Loyalty Review Board noted that the only serious evidence against Remington was "the uncorroborated statement of a woman who refuses to submit herself to cross-examination." It cleared Remington to return to his government post. The libel suit was settled out of court shortly thereafter, with NBC paying Remington $10,000.

Second round of investigations

Ann Remington in Federal Court

In 1950, the FBI and the federal grand jury in New York City reopened their investigations of Remington, and the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) opened a third investigation. Because of continuing suspicions about him, Remington had been demoted at the Commerce Department. His once-promising career in the Truman administration was stagnant. Ann Remington, now divorced from him, was subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury. She testified that her husband had been a dues-paying member of the Communist Party, and that he had given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley while knowing that Bentley was a Communist. A few days later she recanted, and stated that she would claim marital privilege and refuse to testify against her ex-husband in any trial. The grand jury decided to indict Remington for committing perjury when he denied ever being a member of the Communist Party.

Trials

First trial (1950-1951)

Remington's first trial began in late December 1950. Roy Cohn, later to become famous as Joseph McCarthy's chief counsel and already a noted anti-communist, joined the prosecution's legal team.

"Elizabeth Bentley later supplied a wealth of detail about Remington's involvement with her and the espionage conspiracy. Remington's defense was that he had never handled any classified material, hence could not have given any to Miss Bentley. But she remembered all the facts about the rubber-from-garbage invention. We had searched through the archives and discovered the files on the process. We also found the aircraft schedules, which were set up exactly as she said, and inter office memos and tables of personnel which proved Remington had access to both these items. We also discovered Remington's application for a naval commission in which he specifically pointed out that he was, in his present position with the Commerce Department, entrusted with secret military information involving airplanes, armaments, radar, and the Manhattan Project (the atomic bomb)."

During the trial eleven witnesses claimed they knew Remington was a communist. They included Elizabeth Bentley, Ann Remington, Professor Howard Bridgeman of Tufts University, Kenneth McConnell, a Communist organizer in Knoxville; Rudolph Bertram and Christine Benson, who worked with him at the Tennessee Valley Authority; and Paul Crouch, who claimed he provided Remington with copies of the southern edition of the communist newspaper, the Daily Worker.

Ann Moos Remington reversed herself again and testified that her ex-husband had been a Communist Party member and that he had knowingly given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley. Bentley testified, repeating her charge that Remington had given her secret information, saying with regard to the synthetic rubber formula, "He said to me that...he thought that the Russians would need something very much like this." The prosecution also showed that Remington had handled secret documents that were somewhat similar to the aircraft production information that Bentley said she received from him.

During the trial, the defense attorneys revealed that John Brunini, the foreman of the grand jury that indicted Remington, had a personal and financial relationship with Elizabeth Bentley and had agreed to co-author a book with her.

Remington was convicted after a seven-week trial. Judge Gregory E. Noonan sentenced him to five years, the maximum for perjury. He noted that Remington's act of perjury had involved disloyalty to his country. Remington's conviction was celebrated by many. A Washington Daily News editorial said: "William W. Remington now joins the odiferous list of young Communist punks who wormed their way upward in the Government under the New Deal. He was sentenced to five years in prison, and he should serve every minute of it. In Russia, he would have been shot without trial."

Judge Learned Hand (here, in 1910) overturned the first trial's verdict against Remington

Remington's attorneys appealed the verdict. The judicial panel hearing the case included Judge Learned Hand, one of the United States' most eminent jurists. The conviction was overturned on the grounds that Judge Noonan's instructions to the jury were too vague as to exactly what constituted "membership" in the Communist Party, and a new trial was ordered. Hand also criticized grand jury foreman John Brunini and Thomas Donegan, the assistant to the Attorney General who directed the grand jury investigation, for Brunini's relationship with Bentley, and for "judicial improprieties" in their abusive treatment of both Ann and William Remington during questioning.

Second trial (1953)

The government presented a new indictment, charging Remington with five counts of perjury based on his testimony during the first trial. The charge from the first trial, that he perjured himself when denying he had ever been a Communist Party member, was not included.

The second Remington trial began in January 1953 with Judge Vincent L. Leibell presiding. It lasted eight days. The jury found Remington guilty of two counts, for lying (1) when he said he had not given secret information to Elizabeth Bentley, and (2) when he claimed not to know in college of the existence of the Young Communist League, even though it had a chapter at Dartmouth while he was a student there. Leibell sentenced Remington to three years in prison.

Imprisonment and murder

Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury (here, in 2016), where Remington served time

While his attorneys prepared another appeal, Remington began his sentence at Danbury Federal Correctional Institution. There he became friends with fellow prisoner, nonviolent action theorist Gene Sharp, before Remington was transferred to Lewisburg. The appeals court upheld the original verdict, and in February 1954, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case.

Among the inmates at Lewisburg was George McCoy, a violent man with an I.Q. of 61. McCoy was known to have made a number of angry remarks about Remington's communism. On the morning of November 22, 1954, McCoy convinced another inmate, 17-year-old juvenile delinquent Lewis Cagle, Jr., to join him in attacking Remington as he slept. Cagle used a piece of brick in a sock as a weapon, striking Remington four times on the head. A third man, Robert Carl Parker, also participated. Two days later, November 24, 1954, Remington died of his injuries.

The prison warden described it to Remington's second wife as "not a personal attack against Bill...but just the actions of a couple of hoodlums who got all worked up by...the publicity about Communists." The FBI said that robbery was the motive for the crime. His funeral was held in Ridgewood, New Jersey on November 28, 1954.

Aftermath

Press attention focused on whether more should have been done to protect Remington in prison, and whether his murder was motivated by anti-communism. When Cagle confessed, the FBI instructed him to describe the crime as if he and McCoy had been trying to rob Remington. When McCoy confessed four days later, he said he hated Remington for being a Communist and denied any robbery motive.

Worried that Cagle and McCoy's confessions might be ruled inadmissible, and afraid that a jury would be sympathetic toward men who murdered a Communist, U.S. attorney J. Julius Levy later accepted pleas of second degree murder from McCoy, Cagle, and Parker. McCoy and Cagle both received life sentences, while Parker received a 20-year sentence.

Remington remained a puzzling figure for Americans who had difficulty understanding how a "golden boy" from a prestigious family could get caught up in espionage. In his memoir, the investigative journalist Fred J. Cook recounted an incident that illustrated the prevailing sentiment of the time. In early 1957, he was approached by Edward Fitzgerald, editor of Saga magazine:

"Fred, we've been wondering whether you could do a good, in-depth piece for us on William Remington. We'd like to answer the question why a man like Remington from a good family background, a choirboy in his youth, later became a Communist and a spy. It's like the Alger Hiss case. What motivates such men? We'd like to get some insight into what changes men from such good, solid, conservative backgrounds into Communists and traitors to their country. Do you think you could do that for us?"

Marriage and family

Remington was married twice. He and Ann Moos had two children, Galeyn and Bruce. After he divorced Ann, he married Jane Alben. They had a son Neil together.

Legacy

Remington's biographer Gary May concludes:

Clearly, Remington was no political innocent duped by the Communists, and his conviction for perjury seems justified. Yet Remington was no pro-Soviet automaton, no slave to Party or ideology, and not even the FBI, at least privately, was willing to classify him as a Russian spy.

See also

References

  1. Schrecker, Ellen (1998). Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Little, Brown and Company. p. 361. ISBN 0-316-77470-7.
  2. ^ "Remington Denied Link to Red Spies. Former Federal Economist Was Serving 3-Year Term on Perjury Charges". The New York Times. 25 November 1954.
  3. 1920 US Census for Glen Rock, New Jersey
  4. Ogden, David (Fall 2000). "Cold War Science and the Body Politic". Literature and Medicine. 19 (2). Johns Hopkins University Press: 241–261.
  5. "Two Pictures". Time. February 5, 1951. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved 2008-06-07.
  6. ^ "Death Among Thieves". Time. December 6, 1954. Archived from the original on October 24, 2012. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
  7. "The Nation: Remington on the Stand". The New York Times. 28 January 1951. Retrieved 19 June 2008. He went to Dartmouth a Republican but 'moved left quite rapidly' and considered himself a 'radical.' He was not a member of the Communist party or Young Communist League but occasionally told other students in jest that he was a 'bolshevik.'
  8. ^ Trussell, C. P. "Exposure Hinted of Loyalty Files; Raising of Curbs on Records Is Predicted as Key Men Confer in Washington", The New York Times, September 10, 1948. Accessed June 19, 2008.
  9. May 1994, pp. 63–64
  10. Cook, Fred J. (1984). "Witch-Hunters: The Remington Case". Maverick: Fifty Years of Investigative Reporting. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. p. 33. ISBN 0399129936.
  11. Cook 1984, p. 32.
  12. Cook 1984, pp. 33–34.
  13. "A Woman's Memories". Time. 8 January 1951. Archived from the original on 23 November 2010. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
  14. Cook 1984, p. 33.
  15. Fried, Richard M. (March 1996). "Review: Liars' Club: The Remington Case". Reviews in American History. 24 (1): 156–160. JSTOR 30030638. Review of Un-American Activities: The Trials of William Remington by Gary May.
  16. May 1994, p. 87
  17. May 1994, p. 52
  18. May 1994, p. 100
  19. May 1994, p. 122
  20. May 1994, p. 129
  21. "Other Voices". Time. May 15, 1950. Archived from the original on January 31, 2011. Retrieved 2008-05-31. When ex-Spy Bentley repeated her charge on a television show, Remington sued for $100,000 slander, settled out of court, reportedly for $10,000.
  22. "The Remington Case; Prosecution's Witness". New York Times. December 31, 1950. Retrieved 2008-06-04.
  23. Roy Cohn, McCarthy (1968), page 38
  24. "William Remington".
  25. May 1994, p. 227
  26. May 1994, pp. 156–157
  27. May 1994, p. 267
  28. May 1994, p. 179
  29. "Remington Convicted". Time. February 9, 1953. Archived from the original on December 22, 2008. Retrieved 2008-05-29.
  30. ^ United States v. Remington (United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit November 24, 1953), Text.
  31. "Remington Dies in Prison. 2 Inmates Named as Killers". New York Times. November 25, 1954. Retrieved 2008-05-29.
  32. May 1994, p. 308
  33. Weart, William G. (November 27, 1954). "Remington Death Laid To Robbery. 3d Convict Named In Killing. F.B.I. Says He Admitted Looting Victim's Cell". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-06-04.
  34. "Policemen Guard Remington Rites. Six Posted at Jersey Church Because of Threats to Kin of Convict Slain in Prison". New York Times. November 28, 1954. Retrieved 2008-06-04.
  35. May 1994, p. 314
  36. May 1994, pp. 312–318
  37. May 1994, p. 318
  38. "Logansport Pharos Tribune Archives, May 28, 1955, p. 4". NewspaperArchive.com. 1955-05-28. Retrieved 2023-07-01.
  39. Cook 1984, p. 26.
  40. "Marker". brucelarochelle. 6 June 2017.
  41. May 1994, p. 321

External links

Sources

Categories:
William Remington: Difference between revisions Add topic