Misplaced Pages

User talk:ArglebargleIV: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:13, 8 April 2007 editLloyd Shaw (talk | contribs)4 edits Not advertising.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:09, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,359 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
(729 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

Permanent link archiving :<br>
] :<br>
<span class="plainlinks"></span>
<span class="plainlinks">
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
</span>


Please add new comments at the bottom of this page, and sign them.<br>Although Misplaced Pages itself is not censored, I reserve the right to delete offensive obscenity and deliberately disruptive edits. If you're just complaining about me, though, I'll leave it on here, I've nothing to hide. (Except my real name, of course.) -- ] 22:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Please add new comments at the bottom of this page, and sign them.<br>Although Misplaced Pages itself is not censored, I reserve the right to delete offensive obscenity and deliberately disruptive edits. If you're just complaining about me, though, I'll leave it on here, I've nothing to hide. (Except my real name, of course.) -- ] 22:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


== ]: May 14–16 ==
You seem to have an issue with an article about "Vibration Training". Very similar to Pilates it should at least have a reference here at Misplaced Pages. With no bias. Please explain exactly why you did this. As no group , company or person was promoted as per the rules. Thankyou.
]

]
== Re: Thank you ==
The ] is holding online working days in May. As a member of ], editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

You are welcome - no worries! I saw the new pages log after I deleted it the first time and thought it had been recreated by the creating user - it was much nicer to see that it was just having a tag put on it. Thanks for your diligence too. -- ] 22:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thanks for fixing my user page after it was vandalized! ] 20:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

== Author Bibliography ==

First of all i didnt relieze that what i was doing was not allowed

secod i was wondering if it would be alright just to have the images next to the titles of the books and maybe the year it was published leaving out the text.--] 23:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

== Asterisks ==

I noticed you were wondering about the asterisks on several SeaWorld articles. They represent the named orca is deceased. Just passing on the information! ] 16:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
: Thanks for the reply! Even though the asterisk system is used throughout SeaWorld and the orca community, I completely understand. I viewed the Kalina (whale) article and I absolutely love your idea regarding the decease references. Great job! ] 23:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

== Gravitor/Carfiend ==

These two users appear to be separate actual users, but joined at the hip. Their behavior patterns are similar. We went through this with them last summer, and they seemed to go away in September, but they recently resurfaced, again totally focused on this one subject. In my opinion he/they are basically "trolls", or at least they exhibit "excessive" trolling behavior. They are good at starting edit wars and refusing to discuss things, then turning around and accusing everyone else of what they are guilty of. They are very good at pulling others into their game. I got sucked into it last summer, but I've tried to stay on the periphery of it this time and just watch the circus. ] 03:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

: They do seem to be team editing and are thoroughly invested in the double standard. In particular Carfiend's edits (and their timing) during these past few weeks seem to be tactical appendages. I also notice, as Wahkeenah noted, that they seem to co-opt effective arguments and try to use them as their own - usually though, IMHO, they lack the ethical and authetically rational grounds that make those arguments effective and are left with mere choreography and unmoored rationales. I hesitate to say much more, as little pitchers have big ears and I'm sick of reading '''mockumentary''' versions of arguments and insights I hold as valid. By way of complete disclosure I initiated a RFC on Carfiend last summer as a result of the incidences that Wahkeenah desribes. The behavior which prompted the RFC is still apparent. ] 04:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

::You can say that again. The pattern is the same, except that this time it's Gravitor that's more the aggressor. The RFC on Carfiend died on the vine when the both of them disappeared in mid-September... apparently, waiting for the heat to die down so they could start their game again. ] 05:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
:::I was just having a discussion with ], who is talking about doing an RFC on the content dispute. I think that's actually a "request for mediation", and that RFC's are about users, but I could be wrong. Meanwhile, some memories came back as I was telling him about the RFC and the request for mediation that both died when those guys disappeared in September... specifically, about the ridiculous debate over the "rendezvous" definition. Remember that? Anyway, once Carfiend was shown up by the facts, he went away, and took Gravitor (and some other red-link users with similar M.O.s) with him. For awhile. ] 11:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

::::Looks like Gravitor managed to suck Numskll into a set of 3-revert-violations, and they have both been blocked for 24 hours, by separate admins. My guess is that they each went to separate admins to complain about the other. Such a to-do. ] 21:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:::::And by the looks of Gravitor's talk page, he's learned nothing. He continues to delete stuff from his talk page that he doesn't like (calling it "trolling", as Carfiend did in similar circumstances last summer) and continues to parrot the sockpuppet question by accusing several of us of same. (I don't speak for anyone else here, but *I* don't do sockpuppets.) ] 19:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

== Your 3RR warning ==
Thanks. This is me trying to take your advice. I apologize for the inconvenience. The issue of content vs authority is so maddening though - especially given wholely user defined (and collaborative) topics and the range of motives at play. I'm working on more effective rhetorical strategems . . . I'll try (without actually promising) not to always be such a pain. ] 03:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
==Your efforts on Independent evidence==
I appreciate your efforts to make progress on this page, and am trying to assume your good faith, but so far the process has resulted in a total revert on the issues without any rational justification on the talk page. Please take a look at my concerns, Thanks, ] 17:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
:1. Not one piece of evidence on the page is presented by "''proponents of the theory that the Moon landings did not happen''). None of the sources that the evidence come from have anything to do with the hoax.
:2. Not one piece of evidence on the page was collected as a rebuttal to the hoax. In fact, nearly all of it (perhaps all) was collected '''before the hoax accusations were even made'''. To present this as part of a back-and-forth between the hoax proponents and landing defenders is a gross misrepresentation.
:3. The people who collected this evidence are independent observatories and amateur astronomers. They collected it for their own reasons, certainly not as part of the hoax discussion.
:4 The discussions on Misplaced Pages that produced this page are not a good reason to structure the information.

::Did you manage to take a look at this? Thanks, ] 16:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

== Edit summaries ==

Hi, just thought you might want to check your edit summaries; I think something is broken. Thanks – ] 06:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

== <deleted> ==

'''Obscenity deleted by ArglebargleIV.''' <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 01:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

In the Watergate era, the expression "]" was a hot catchphrase for awhile. It's still good. :) ] 04:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Darn, I should have used that! And I was even around then (although still in elementary school), I should have remembered it. Oh well. :-) -- ] 04:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

== Empress Xiao De Xian ==
Yes i know what u mean whit the ID thing about her. But i was actually sure that is was her. In the book there is no source to that bit of text. Sterling Seagrave wrote that there was an ancestor painting of Empress Xiao Zhen Xian. He also wrote how the painting looks like and by that i thought it was actually Empress Xiao De Xian. He says that she had a pointy chin and a dreamly look and if u look closely to the painting "i have got a much bigger and better version of it" u can see what i mean.
But sometime it's very difficult to give reference cause a lot of chinese history is based on rumours. But anyway we can discuss about it:). (Read the book it's very good. ) It's called the Dragon Lady by Sterling Seagrave ISBN 0-679-40230-6

But one thing is sure, There is no ancestor painting of Empress Xiao Zhen Xian so it must be someone else.


== Read before you call some a vandal ==

Hey Jackass, John Renold Aufenstein was cited. It was erased because someone put an offensive name, calling him gay. Instead of reverting, they deleted the name

You see the little 1 in brackets?

ITS A CITATION.

Try clicking on it and seeing the reference next time.

Thank you.

] 03:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


Oh, wow. I'm glad you could spend your time on worrying about c's page, even enough to ask a reference who submitted it, and if someone disagrees with you, which seems to be quite a few people, you could always call them vandals. Nothing like threating an anonymous user with a non-static ip (or dynamic... it changes whenever they log out).

Sorry if you failed your book report on Ryan Seacrest because someone cited another website and reveled that Seacrest's name was actually ethnic. Now what will America do if they found out.

Maybe you're right, we should cover it up and erases any traces of it. What will we do if he says "Aufenstein, out"


Pandemonium, I tell you.


Hey ArglebargleIV, I submitted an entry to the notable games section of Marty Foster's body of work. I appreciate your concern and hesitation regarding my addition. I would like an additional review of the matter, as I believe my entry to be accurate and cited appropriately.
But then again, someone will always know and make elaborate clues to get to the truth and Dan Brown will write a novel about it. I think he'll go for '''The Arglebargle Code''' or '''Arglebargles and Dynamic63.136.116.166s'''


] 04:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.


'''More information, and registration details, at <big>]</big>.'''--] 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Wow, it took a whole two seconds to think up what i wrote, but i guess 2 seconds of thinking is just plain unhealthy.
It seems to me that most vandalism on seacrest is about his sexual orientation...
I guess someone decided to go to IMDb and make up a name, solely to place it on here...
A name that sounds Jewish...


== ] article question ==
We'll I see how calling him gay with ] and an ethnic name with no gay name calling are alike. Gay, Jewish... same thing, right?
Hey ArglebargleIV, I made a change to Siva_Shankar Baba page because the content on the paragrapah arrest is incorrect and he was falsely implicated. Therefore it is appropriate to just state the fact that he was arrested and that the case is under investigation. The false allegations on his page would be offensive to thousands of his followers. I appreciate your understanding in this context. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span>


Can you please explain why you are falsely charging Siva Shankar Baba ? What is your motive behind it. Please explain.
] 05:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
* It is not a matter of my falsely charging ] -- you removed a paragraph which was referenced, I was merely restoring it since your reason was basically "I and other people think it's wrong." You should discuss that at ] before making removals like that. -- ] (]) 05:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


== Sorry about the reversion == == Citation removed ==


] : Many citations were removed by you. They should be restored. Thanks! ] (]) 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I got a little carried away. Normally I would only revert a user page, not a user's talk page. Feel free to delete ''this'', though. :) ] 04:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


* I was merely restoring ]'s edit that I accidentally overwrote. I believe, although you should confirm with them, that your string of edits was reverted by them because, in that string, you removed the Articles for Deletion template, which you're not supposed to do while the discussion about deleting the article is still open. If you think your references would help the article, you should add them to the article, but leave the AFD template alone. -- ] (]) 05:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
==Templates==
Hi Argle, for future reference, it's not a good idea to place warning templates on the pages of established editors, or to accuse them of vandalism, as you did . It's best to assume good faith of people who've been contributing for a long time, and if you feel you have to comment on an edit from a long-term contributor, always best to leave a personal note. Cheers, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 18:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


== REMOVING TWO ENTRIES ON PAGE LIST OF OVERSEAS MILITARY BASES: ==
==Adam Aircraft Industries==
I am a former employeee so I have personal experience. Please don't delete that again, it needs to be said.--] 22:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


Hi ArglebargleIV, I have to remove the two entries on aforementioned page, in segment India's overseas military bases, as it mentioned bases in Iran & Singapore. However it's false, as Iranian Government has only permitted cargo shipping operations for India at Chabahar port (even that has been curtailed as last year Iranian Government expelled India from further work), not stationing of military, as well as the case of Singapore, where only joint training is proposed of both navies & not birthing rights, so in pure sense, it's not called a military base in technicality. -- <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span>
I deleted nothing, and I am the source because as I said I AM A FORMER EMPLOYEE. Stop deleting information about a company that you have absolutely no idea about.--] 22:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


* I only reverted your edit because there was no explanation given in the edit summary, not because I think you're correct or incorrect. If you remove it again, fill in the summary with why you removed the data, and you should probably make a mention of why on the talk page for ], so other editors can understand the why of your edit, and possibly discuss it as well. Thanks! -- ] (]) 09:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Whatever, this is ridiculous and you are ridiculous.--] 22:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


== Reverting legitimate corrections ==
So according to yours and wikipedias reasoning, anything that is not sourced should not be in an article. Then why do I get the same crap for taking things that are not sourced out of articles? Its the exact same thing you are doing, yet Im the only one getting bitched at.--] 22:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


In , the IP was correct. (See: ].) Did you check to see if that were the case or was your revert a knee-jerk reaction to an IP edit? ] (]) 12:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
== Deleted namecalling comment by ] ==
* It was not a "knee-jerk reaction to an IP edit". I made a mistake. I have put ]'s edit back (with correct spelling). -- ] (]) 17:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
**Actually the former text was correct: the Caspian Sea is saline and the sentence speaks of ''freshwater'' lakes. ] (]) 18:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
***Thank you for correcting the article and correcting me. -- ] (]) 18:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


== Could you assist me with a concern about edits credited to me that I !definitely! didn't make? Thanks (: ==
== FinancialContent, Inc. Dispute ==


Trying to reach out, as I'm seeing my IP and/or username associated with several edits that range from pointless to offensive. I don't know how it happened, I'm not exceptionally tech savvy but my IP address was on an edit you fixed in the LGBT portal. Even if I wasn't part of the lgbtqai comment, the comment I supposedly made would be really upsetting to me. Not to mention I don't want homophobic vandalism to contribute to my account ever getting blocked.
This isn't a spam promotion - we're just putting up info on when the company was founded and what it is factually, however I feel that a speedy deletion is being made to quickly.


Thank you for your time ] (]) 01:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
The page in question is ] and ] - i'd prefer to use the latter.


* I'll try to do my best, but for an authoritative answer, I suggest posting this at ] (I hope I picked the right one!)<br>In general, practically no one can see which IP you are using if you edit while you are logged in. That information is kept private, and can only be accessed by a ], a fairly small group of trusted users who use that power to check for people using multiple accounts when it is not allowed. (More details and a better explanation at the Checkuser link.) I'm not a Checkuser (or an administrator, or even close to being one!). Nobody's going to associate you with IP edits, because, except in very rare circustances, nobody's going to connect your Misplaced Pages account to any IP address. Many internet connections do not have fixed IP addresses -- what may have happened to you is your current IP address may have 'belonged' to another person earlier, and they did the nasty edits (and I understand, I certainly wouldn't want to be associated with those myself!) I don't think you should worry about it, but you can try posting at ] or maybe ] or ]. I hope that helped. -- ] (]) 10:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Other companies, such as ], have done the same thing we are trying to do.
* On second thought, ] or ] are better first choices to verify this. -- ] (]) 12:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


== Thanks! == ==Reporting a user==
Hi ArglebargleIV, I would like to report the activities of ] (]) who keeps removing content from pages, including sourced information, with no justification. ] (]) 16:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page, I really appreciate it! --] 00:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
== RfC on Gravitor ==
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A ] has been filed concerning the '''conduct''' of {{User|Gravitor}}. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. -- ] 13:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:ConductDiscussion -->


If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 -->
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> –] (]) 13:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


== Moved from my user page == == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
'''Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia created for, and by, the people.'''
"Wiki-bullies" who view themselves righteous enforcers of "wiki-law" undermine their own supposed beliefs. If you really want to be an encyclopedia editor, GET A REAL JOB WITH A REAL ENCYCLOPEDIA.


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITTANICA.
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT WORLD BOOK.


If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
WIKIPEDIA IS WRITTEN BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, AND MUST NOT BE POLICED BY PSEUDO-ENFORCERS.


</div>
Just because there is no real-world law regarding wikipedia, why must you create one for yourself? Why must you always seek to gain power? Can you no longer be content with being an equal; a peer? Your power-hungry behavior is an animosity, echoing the behavior of countless other unwanted enforcers who drew themselves to power.
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 -->


== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
Grow up.
{{unsigned|Quickfastgoninja}}


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
==Reply==
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
Apologies for no sig; I can't find the tildes on my laptop - not even kidding.
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Thought I was on your talk page earlier; D'oh!
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
-quickfastgoninja


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Stop removing my reference links ==


If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
These are legitimate interviews on pornconfidential.com No one is spamming. Please stop <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 05:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->


</div>
== ] ==
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 -->


== Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C ==
Hi ArglebargleIV


<section begin="announcement-content" />
I saw your message on the ] page and I wanted to just leave a message to say a couple of things. First, I'm not angry at all that you've marked the page for deletion. The work you do keeps Misplaced Pages a tidy and clean place. I also anticipated that the article may be marked for deletion, because as you said, it is the first of its kind for any football|soccer player on Misplaced Pages. However, I ask you to listen to my points as to why this article should remain on Misplaced Pages, since they were what made me think the article should be created in the first place.
:''] ''


Dear Wikimedian,
*This is the most comprehensive football|soccer player's article on Misplaced Pages, and just because Pele's article is not so comprehensive, it shouldn't mean that others are limited to its size. It seems like an unnecessary bottleneck.
*The goals which Gilberto have scored are encyclopaedic information
*The information which is listed on ] was listed on his main article (]) for a number of months, proving it is indeed fit for Misplaced Pages, and...
*It was only moved to a separate page because it was too chunky for its parent page. If the goals page is deleted, the information will only be pasted back onto the main article; I feel that would be less tidy/organized that it having its own page.
*The reason Pele doesn't have his own goal page (or table) is due to the sheer number of goals that Gilberto scored. Some of the details of the goals are probably lost to history. Gilberto will only ever score about 50 goals, and they are all fairly recent, so his page can exist quite easily. The information is readily available. This is not to say that just the fact that Gilberto has scored LESS goals than most allows him to have his own goal page. Quite the opposite. There is even more reason that Pele should have his own page; the only reason that he doesn't though, is that nobody is willing (or able?) to compile a list of his many hundreds of career goals. This is a first step to more comprehensive soccer player articles; it shows editors a new added level of useful detail which can be attained.
*Maybe Gilberto's goal page will lead to Pele (and other notable footballers) having their own statistics/goal pages. Maybe not. But the fact that no other editors have taken the time to compile such lists which require their own pages, surely does not mean that those editors which have, cannot have their pages exist.
*Some Basketball and American Football players do have their own 'statistics' pages. See ] or ]. True, this page isn't on the same scale as said career achievements pages, but the fact that Gilberto is so much less famous means his small goals page is correct to scale.


You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
Wow! I typed a lot. I apologise. Thank you for reading, and I appreciate your comments, whether they are for or against the article's existence.


This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
All the best, and keep up the good work. -] 18:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ].
:Dear ArglebargleIV... what can I say... thanks! I appreciate how willing you've been to hear my arguments. I've seen that a lot of people have been angry at you for your work, but you've shown that if people approach you in a decent manner, you're very accommodating. All the best, ] 19:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
==Re: Speedy==
No, you tagging it as speedy is not 3RR, it clearly qualifies. If he keeps recreating it that is disruption, I will have to deal with this when I get back as I'm leaving for class right now, feel free to tag it again though. ] 21:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" />
== Ramana (film) ==


] 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Unfortuately when you moved it you also moved to speedy deletion request too. Thanks! - ]<font color="#000000">]</font><font color="#000000"><sup style="font-variant: small-caps;">|</sup></font><font color="#000000">]</font> 22:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 -->


== Invitation to participate in a research ==


Hello,
== Nonsense edits by user Bantilan ==


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
Hi there;


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
You've previously flagged the user "Bantilan" for adding nonsense ... it looks like he's at it again from an anonymous IP address ... maybe you could request that this guy's IP address get blocked? Still figuring out how to do this kind of thing myself ... thanks. Here's the edit history page for his IP address: http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/125.60.189.62


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
== Thanks ==
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. We make a good anti-vandal team.--] (] <small>•</small> ]) 00:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== ] ==


]
I've removed the speedy deletion tag from the above article. While the subject might not be notable, the article does ''assert'' notability in a reasonable way. You may wish to list it at ] instead, to get a broader consensus on the article. Thanks for your time and your hard work reporting these articles - even though I'm not deleting this particular one, your efforts are very much appreciated. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
:Okay, I should have noticed the difference between having notability and asserting notability -- thanks for the correction and the advice! -- ] 13:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 -->


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
==Wrong Info==
*Please stop putting inflated sales for Britney Spears and Backstreet Boys' albums. And I got the correct info from Billboard and RIAA for the List of USA's highest selling albums list, so everything I put is fine.] 21:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


Hello,
== ] ==


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
Hi, I note that at the article Westfield Penrith you recently reverted an IP edit with the edit comment you copied from ] - ''removing external link: *.gpt.com.au -- per external link guidelines''.
Unfortunately, in this case, ] was not in line with ] as the link removed was the only reference for this article - an inline citation pointing to the website of the 1/2 owner of this complex. A ] beats no reference at all. Please don't remove inline citations under the edit comment of complying with ], which relates to excessive links in an '''external links''' section (such as bands linking their ''official site'' as well as their myspace page and their forum page and their page on google images...).


Take the survey ''''''.
I have:
* restored the inline citation
* verified that it is appropriate source for this article
* inserted additional information from this source.
Thanks,
]]] 22:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
:I was concerned about ending up in a revert war over an external link. ''Sometimes'' IP edits are worth keeping but I know I revert a lot more IP than signed-in edits myself... ]]] 21:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


]


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== Fafarazzi ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744489 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
I added more info about fafarazzi, a few citings of it's history, and a link to a google search on it on the discussion page. That should be enough for notability.--] 21:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
== The New Release ==
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I would like to know why you went ahead with the deletion of the page I created. As I stated, I was working very hard on this page in order to make it less of an "advertisement" as you called it. Now I have to start over again. Please alert me before you do this again.


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
] 13:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


</div>
== Cool guy came back ==
</div>
Please check ]. I cannot really justify speedy deletion - once we remove his name from the articles they cease to be spam. But if you think they need AfD, go ahead. -- ] 16:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

Latest revision as of 00:09, 19 November 2024

Permanent link archiving :

Please add new comments at the bottom of this page, and sign them.
Although Misplaced Pages itself is not censored, I reserve the right to delete offensive obscenity and deliberately disruptive edits. If you're just complaining about me, though, I'll leave it on here, I've nothing to hide. (Except my real name, of course.) -- ArglebargleIV 22:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Queering Misplaced Pages 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.


Hey ArglebargleIV, I submitted an entry to the notable games section of Marty Foster's body of work. I appreciate your concern and hesitation regarding my addition. I would like an additional review of the matter, as I believe my entry to be accurate and cited appropriately.


We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Siva Shankar Baba article question

Hey ArglebargleIV, I made a change to Siva_Shankar Baba page because the content on the paragrapah arrest is incorrect and he was falsely implicated. Therefore it is appropriate to just state the fact that he was arrested and that the case is under investigation. The false allegations on his page would be offensive to thousands of his followers. I appreciate your understanding in this context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sss srini (talk • contribs)

Can you please explain why you are falsely charging Siva Shankar Baba ? What is your motive behind it. Please explain.

Citation removed

Sudip Lamichhane : Many citations were removed by you. They should be restored. Thanks! Takdeerr (talk) 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

  • I was merely restoring user:Materialscientist's edit that I accidentally overwrote. I believe, although you should confirm with them, that your string of edits was reverted by them because, in that string, you removed the Articles for Deletion template, which you're not supposed to do while the discussion about deleting the article is still open. If you think your references would help the article, you should add them to the article, but leave the AFD template alone. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

REMOVING TWO ENTRIES ON PAGE LIST OF OVERSEAS MILITARY BASES:

Hi ArglebargleIV, I have to remove the two entries on aforementioned page, in segment India's overseas military bases, as it mentioned bases in Iran & Singapore. However it's false, as Iranian Government has only permitted cargo shipping operations for India at Chabahar port (even that has been curtailed as last year Iranian Government expelled India from further work), not stationing of military, as well as the case of Singapore, where only joint training is proposed of both navies & not birthing rights, so in pure sense, it's not called a military base in technicality. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.228.192.1 (talk • contribs)

  • I only reverted your edit because there was no explanation given in the edit summary, not because I think you're correct or incorrect. If you remove it again, fill in the summary with why you removed the data, and you should probably make a mention of why on the talk page for List of countries with overseas military bases, so other editors can understand the why of your edit, and possibly discuss it as well. Thanks! -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Reverting legitimate corrections

In this case, the IP was correct. (See: List of lakes by area.) Did you check to see if that were the case or was your revert a knee-jerk reaction to an IP edit? MarconiCheese (talk) 12:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Could you assist me with a concern about edits credited to me that I !definitely! didn't make? Thanks (:

Trying to reach out, as I'm seeing my IP and/or username associated with several edits that range from pointless to offensive. I don't know how it happened, I'm not exceptionally tech savvy but my IP address was on an edit you fixed in the LGBT portal. Even if I wasn't part of the lgbtqai comment, the comment I supposedly made would be really upsetting to me. Not to mention I don't want homophobic vandalism to contribute to my account ever getting blocked.

Thank you for your time Agentgdward (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

  • I'll try to do my best, but for an authoritative answer, I suggest posting this at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard (I hope I picked the right one!)
    In general, practically no one can see which IP you are using if you edit while you are logged in. That information is kept private, and can only be accessed by a WP:checkuser, a fairly small group of trusted users who use that power to check for people using multiple accounts when it is not allowed. (More details and a better explanation at the Checkuser link.) I'm not a Checkuser (or an administrator, or even close to being one!). Nobody's going to associate you with IP edits, because, except in very rare circustances, nobody's going to connect your Misplaced Pages account to any IP address. Many internet connections do not have fixed IP addresses -- what may have happened to you is your current IP address may have 'belonged' to another person earlier, and they did the nasty edits (and I understand, I certainly wouldn't want to be associated with those myself!) I don't think you should worry about it, but you can try posting at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard or maybe Misplaced Pages:Teahouse or Misplaced Pages:Help desk. I hope that helped. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • On second thought, Misplaced Pages:Teahouse or Misplaced Pages:Help desk are better first choices to verify this. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Reporting a user

Hi ArglebargleIV, I would like to report the activities of 213.249.184.124 (contribs) who keeps removing content from pages, including sourced information, with no justification. Arabela13 (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:6TeamRoundRobin

Template:6TeamRoundRobin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)