Revision as of 20:46, 29 April 2024 editHistoryofIran (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers97,604 edits →Reach consensus: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:42, 7 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to Talk:Hazaras/Archive 3) (bot |
(72 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Hazara|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=High|}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups|importance=High|}} |
|
{{WikiProject Afghanistan|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Afghanistan|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Central Asia|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Central Asia|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Iran|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Iran|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=High|Balochistan=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan|Balochistan=y|importance=High|Balochistan-importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=mid|mongolia=yes|mongolia-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=mid|mongolia=yes|mongolia-importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Line 33: |
Line 31: |
|
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=150|index=/Archive index}} |
|
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=150|index=/Archive index}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== The use of the word "azra" instead of "Hazara" among Hazaras to refer to themselves. == |
|
== Provide a source == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the Etymology section of the article it claims that Hazaras use the word "azra" to refer to themselves. I see it uses a secondary source for this claim. But a primary source on this topic I have discrovered, "The Races Of Afghanistan |
|
@] The number given is from already established sources give proof otherwise you will be reported. ] (]) 02:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
by H. W. Bellew" records that Hazaras in the late 1800s never refered to themselves as "hazara" and it is external word that outsiders call Hazaras. They refered to themselves as simply what tribe they are from. So I believe this "azra" word, anecdotally speaking as a hazara, is unheard off ontop of being a novelty with no historical basis. This is all my belief of course backed by a primary acccount. ] (]) 02:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Ross E. Denison in his introduction notes to Dughlat's Tarikh-i rashidi mentions that "Hazara" has no "racial consideration" to it and means "Hill-men" or "mountaineer". Bacon in her work makes the same observation that it means something akin to "Mountain tribal" and is word that is used for other ethinc groups also if they are mountain tribal. Though they both acknowledge that in the modern era the term "Hazara" is a word reserved for the people who live within Central Afghanistan now. ] (]) 11:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Dear user, you must provide a reliable source. Thanks! ] (]) 02:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::I agree but the number I gave is from sources mentioned by country In the infobox. ] (]) 03:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thank you! The number should not be estimated based on countries because some countries where Hazaras live are not available in the infobox and the number I restored is higher than your estimate. ] (]) 03:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::If you find any source then use it but so far these are the only sources so it ehould be based on these numbers. ] (]) 07:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::What you are dling counts as vandalism if you do it again I will report you I have given you many chances find a source that proves you claims. @] ] (]) 18:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Dear {{Ping|Barbardo}} Based on which source did you make changes to the article? If you consider my edits to be vandalism, then you are doing vandalism yourself. I have also given you chances to provide reliable sources to prove your claim. ] (]) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Are you being serious? You are messing with the sources given and claiming its 10 to 14 million find a source to prove it even the changes you made only made 8 million if you dont provide a source to prove your claim and revert the edit you will be reported. I already told you I got the numbers from the countries mentioned in the userbox lets see whp they will agree with if you think I am the vandal. @] ] (]) 19:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::You may not change the figure provided based on the source that the total Hazara population are "more than 8 million". Thanks! ] (]) 20:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::But its not hazara largerly only live in pakistan, afghanistan and iran there population number is given while the rest is diaspora in europe and northen america and they are not in the millions and their numbers are already given @] ] (]) 20:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Ignore what I said you gave a source now my bad @] ] (]) 20:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::Thank you! ] (]) 21:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::What is even going on here. You two are still reverting each other (] and ]). ] (]) 22:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::I think we settled it now so its fine. ] (]) 22:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 September 2024 == |
|
== Non-existent and wrong source == |
|
|
|
|
|
The did not say anything about the language and history of the Hazara people. The information in the Hazaras article was added based on this false and non-existent source. Please see ] (]) 23:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 December 2023 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
{{edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
Add a few famous people in the article. ] (]) 15:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
Hazaras are evidently descendants of the Kushan people ] (]) 11:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Source? --] (]) 11:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 18:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:It is generally agreed that the Kushans were a people of Tocharian origin. If not, it is universally accepted that they were a phenotypically Caucasian Indo-European group. This would mean they most likely resembled the modern-day Nuristani or Pamiri, not the Hazara. |
|
|
:# The first mention of the Hazaras was by Babur in his autobiography, "Baburnama," where he notes that the Hazaras speak "]." Most historians agree that the 16th century marks the period when the Hazaras emerged as a distinct ethnic group. |
|
|
:# Faiz Muhammad Kateb, a Hazara historian, in his book on Afghanistan’s history, ''Siraj al-Tawarikh'', notes that he is from the tribe of "]," a Timurid/Mughal nobleman and commander-in-chief of Babur’s army from the Mongol Barlas tribe. He further mentions that his father’s name was "Said Muhammad Moghol." |
|
|
:# In his book, Kateb also records that about 10,000 families in Ghazni, referred to as "]," spoke Mongolian. This was in the late 1800s. |
|
|
:Considering this, it should be sufficient to prove that the Hazaras are of Mongol origin, particularly through the Timurids, Chagatais, and Ilkhanates. I would recommend Elizabeth Bacon's work on this subject. ] (]) 03:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::The origins of the Hazara people have not been fully reconstructed. Genetic and linguistic analyses describe Hazaras as an ethnically mixed group, with varying degrees of ancestry linked to contemporary Turkic, Mongolic, and Iranic populations. phenotypically, Hazaras share a common racial structure and physical resemblance with the Turkic people of Central Asia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:#The first mention of the Hazaras was by Babur in his autobiography, '']'', also he notes the Hazaras as Turkic (]). |
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 December 2023 == |
|
|
|
:#"] belonged to the ] ] confederation. His ancestral homeland is ], in present day ]. Emir Muhammad Khwaja was the son of Emir Haji Saifuddin who was wazir of ], and the ], the ], and the ] were Turkic in every way. |
|
|
:#The "Muhammad Khwaja Hazaras" spoke the ], a ] of the ] branch, which was completely a Turkic language.--] (]) 10:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 November 2024 == |
|
{{Edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
|
I would like to add Pakistani Hazara jurist ] to the article. ] (]) 17:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 17:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
== Population == |
|
|
|
I want to include the total population of Hazaras "'''c. 10-12 million'''"<ref></ref> according to the source in the article.--] (]) 10:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
{{ping|HistoryofIran}} If the source I added is not ], then the previous source is still not ]. It was previously removed because it was not ]. Thank you! ] (]) 16:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:] '''Not done''': it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 09:07, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2024 == |
|
:Just because x is unreliable doesn't mean that y also is. However, since the consensus was that Minahan is not ], I removed it and thus its numbers too. ] (]) 16:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks! ] (]) 16:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
== Reverting reasons == |
|
|
|
1. Under 20 and 21st century, I'm requesting to add further information about the Mazar-e Sharif massacre and link the wiki page to it (https://en.wikipedia.org/1998_Mazar-i-Sharif_massacre). The main source for the massacre is from Human Rights Watch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/afghan/Afrepor0.htm |
|
{{Ping|HistoryofIran}} Hi, I don't know why you reverted my edit as I explained it. There is a tribe called ], who are descendants of the Mongol Empire's soldiers led by Genghis Khan in Afghanistan. |
|
|
And what I removed was inaccurate information that did not pertain to the Hazara people. ] (]) 18:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I'm requesting to add a separate section about Hazara embroidery, which is an important part of Hazara culture. |
|
:I still don't understand. Are you trying to refute scholars by stating your own deduction? Or are you stating that the sources don't even mention the Hazara? The former is obviously not acceptable. ] (]) 18:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::As I said in the editing summary, ] are not Hazaras, this is a clear truth. First: the information that I removed was said based on the ] about the Hazara people. Second: that content doesn't help much for the Misplaced Pages article, it's better not to have it. ] (]) 19:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::So the former then. That is not acceptable, Wiki is based on ], not our personal opinions. Please dont do this again. Ill later do a check and see if you removed more sourced info in this article in the past. It looks like you have resumed your past edits of removing sources info about the Mongol aspect of the Hazaras, which will not be further tolerated. ] (]) 20:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Dear ]: Misplaced Pages should be based on facts, information that is unlikely to be true should not be found here. ] (]) 20:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Yes, and it's currently based on facts. It would likely not be based on facts if we added your opinion. Why? Because Misplaced Pages is based on ], not your personal opinion. You've been around since 2021, you should know this. ] (]) 21:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::For those interested, I've taken this to ] . ] (]) 23:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: |
|
== Transliteration == |
|
|
|
https://trc-leiden.nl/trc-needles/regional-traditions/iranian-plateau/hazara-embroidery-afghanistan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://camilcollection.com/blog#:~:text=The%20Hazaras%20from%20central%20Afghanistan,work%20rather%20than%20freestyle%20embroidery. |
|
@] can you show where "Həzārə" was "agreed upon"? I can't find anything on the talk page(s) and there's nothing in the edit log to suggest there was a consensus. ] (]) 23:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.vam.ac.uk/event/R7BV5VdP7L/hazara-dress-and-embroidery-from-afghanistan?srsltid=AfmBOop450aRPlfbkVRbiIUgL_1dYvAdZ3kwdk02zT-_c0ab5NXQ0Y2m |
|
:Hi! It "Həzārə" was a minor edit that doesn't need to be discussed, you can make changes to it if you wish. ] (]) 23:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Oh my bad, I didn't look at the edit log correctly, sorry about that! ] (]) 23:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.womenrise.art/story/hazara-artist-latifa-attaii |
|
== Hazaras == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hazaras are not native to Pakistan and Iran. They are merely inhabitants of said countries. |
|
|
|
|
|
They are native to the Hazarajat region. ] (]) 21:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
|
I would like to restore some recently deleted reliable sourced information. ] (]) 18:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 18:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2024 (2) == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Hazaras|answered=yes}} |
|
|
A user named ] has recently removed several reliable sourced content supported from Encyclopaedia of Islam and Encyclopædia Iranica, and made inappropriate changes in the article. See I hereby request to participate in the editing of the article and edit and restore those authentic sourced materials. ] (]) 20:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Actually, KoizumiBS restored sourced information that was removed by the now indeffed user who kept attempting to remove the Mongol aspect of the Hazara, and who also made incorrect claims like you. You wouldn't happen to know Jadidjw? --] (]) 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::There is reason to believe that Bravehm is a sockpuppet of the blocked Iampharzad and Jadidjw. See ] ] (]) 23:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::The current changes in the article are biased and tasteful by one person. They edit the article according to their will, not from all aspects, they changed the correct and stable contents under the pretext of reverting some information. ] (]) 23:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::You misleadingly claimed that KoizumiBS removed sourced information, when they literally did the opposite. And yet you're calling KoizumiBS biased and distasteful? That is rich. ] (]) 23:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::So what is the reason for changing the article information and this type editing of KoizumiBS. See all KoizumiBS contributions, they are only for one purpose in Misplaced Pages ] (]) 00:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::This sounds like ]. ] (]) 00:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Don't get it wrong. Any subversive editing should not be liked. ] (]) 00:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::You're still yet to explain why its "subversive", and as long as you haven't done that, this is ]. ] (]) 00:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::Under the guise of restored sourced info, KoizumiBS has changed sourced info that previously had nothing wrong with it, and this is a subversive edit. ] (]) 00:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::Not good enough, this is quite vague. Please come with examples. ] (]) 00:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::For example, KoizumiBS changed sourced info from Encyclopaedia of Islam "The Hazara people speak the Hazaragi dialect of Persian, which is infused with many ] and a few ] words." to "According to ], The Hazara speak an eastern variety of Persian called Hazaragi with many ] and ] words." |
|
|
:::::::::::Changed sourced info from Encyclopaedia Iranica "In the 16th-century, some Hazaras spoke a Mongolian language." to "According to a number of sources, in the 16th century the Mongolian language was widespread among the Hazaras." |
|
|
:::::::::::Others see for yourself. ] (]) 01:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::This is poor, the two examples you came up with are more and less the same before and after, KoizumiBS literally just restored the information removed by Jadidjw. So much for the "subversive edit". I'm outta here. ] (]) 01:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::I have left the others for you to check because there are too many of them and it would be difficult to describe them here. ] (]) 01:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::Not how it works. ] (]) 23:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Reach consensus == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. ] (]) 05:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
{{ping|HistoryofIran}} It was a restoretion of the previous sourced edit where the User:KoizumiBS made inappropriate changes. |
|
|
User:KoizumiBS has mentioned about Sultan Masaudi Hazaras in the "Etymology" section, which is not appropriate there. ] (]) 23:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
:{{not done for now}}:<!-- Template:EEp --> Please write out exactly what you want put in the article ] (]) 09:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Lede requires better formatting, grammar and is missing punctuations. == |
|
:You didn't think it fit the Etymology section.. so you removed it completely instead of moving it to another section (eg History section)? There's something you're not telling. Is this ] like the thread above? ] (]) 00:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::The content about Hazaras of Sultan Masaudi Hazaras and Kedi Hazaras ware removed because they not quite appropriate in the Etymology section. ] (]) 01:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::You've already mentioned that part. But why not move it somewhere else instead of completely removing it? ] (]) 02:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::To be honest, I don’t understand why these groups are mentioned in the Etymology section. I think they should be moved to the History section. "Turkoman Hazaras" is only the name of one of the tribes, and not the equivalent of an ethnonym "Hazaras". ] (]) 07:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Agreed, though for some reason Bravehm keeps removing it instead, they just did again, I think there is an ulterior motive here. I'm getting deja vu from my experience with Iampharzad and co. ] (]) 11:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::{{Done}} moved somewhere else. ] (]) 12:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::I am not the person you make me out to be. ] (]) 12:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::"Turkoman Hazaras" are a tribe against which Babur launched a military campaign. The ethnonym "Turkoman" isn't a name for all Hazaras. See "]" and "]". ] (]) 01:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::Read the ], ], ] rules: "Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself".--] (]) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::It doesn't matter one or more Hazara tribes, it is about Hazara's ethnic roots, and this is in the "Origin" part of the article. When it is like this about the Mongols, then you attribute one tribe on all Hazaras. Several information that you included in the article, it was only about one or a group of Hazaras, but you attributed it to all Hazaras. ] (]) 05:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::You have included several information about the Mongolian aspect of the Hazaras in the article, They are basically about one tribe or a group related to the Hazaras, but you attributed it to all Hazaras. |
|
|
:::::::::For example you have given a Russian source which is only about one group of them, like: "еще в XVI веке говорили хазарейцы по-монгольски в северной части Афганистана" (In the 16th century, the Hazaras in northern Afghanistan spoke Mongolian) But you attributed it to all the Hazaras and its ]. ] (]) 06:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::I include the information about one group of Hazaras in the article, and the information you added, which is only about one group, should be corrected. ] (]) 06:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::Everything I added was taken from reliable sources. I didn’t write my personal thoughts here. ] (]) 07:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::Thanks for rewriting and correcting the info. |
|
|
:::::::::::My goal is that in the genetic studies of an ethnic group, all aspects of its descent should be studied. Since the Hazaras are made up of three racial groups of Iranian, Turkic and Mongols, all three aspects should be studied, not just the Mongol aspects, or Turkic aspects, or Iranian aspects. ] (]) 11:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::Please refrain from altering/removing sourced information without any ]. To others reading this, this is what Bravehm altered; "According to Doctor of Sciences Lutfi Temirkhanov, the ancestors of '''the''' Hazaras were Mongol-speaking" -> "According to Doctor of Sciences Lutfi Temirkhanov, the ancestors of '''some''' Hazaras were Mongol-speaking." And they removed this; "According other sources, the Hazara population speaks Persian with some Mongolian words." ] (]) 12:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::Because the info is not even in the source, Timur Khanov cited Babur notes, for example, while Babur did not said all Hazaras speak Mongolian, but '''some''' of them. I added the word '''some''' for this reason. ] (]) 13:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::The removal under the edit summary (Unresearched and repeated) was about the existence of words from other languages in Hazaragi and there were four contents about it, removal was only one of them, because it was repetitive, incomplete and only mentioned about the Mongolian language, while there are many Turkic words are available in Hazaragi. It is better to highlight the non-Mongolic aspects of the Hazaras too. ] (]) 14:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::{{tq|Because the info is not even in the source}} |
|
|
::::::::::::::The next time you make a dishonest claim or any sort of disruption, you and your SPI case will be taken to ANI. What the two citations say (Google translate); |
|
|
::::::::::::::* "the Mongol troops left in Afghanistan by Genghis Khan or his successors became the initial layer, the basis of the Hazara ethnogenesis." |
|
|
::::::::::::::* "The participation of the Mongols in the ethnogenesis of the Hazaras is evidenced by linguistic data... also historical sources (for example, “Notes of Babur”) and toponymic data" |
|
|
::::::::::::::{{tq|while there are many Turkic words are available in Hazaragi. It is better to highlight the non-Mongolic aspects of the Hazaras too.}} |
|
|
::::::::::::::Then add (sourced) info about their non-Mongol aspect instead of removing sourced info about their Mongol aspect..? ] (]) 15:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::::So why did Babur state in Baburnama that some Hazaras speak Mongolian. (i.e. not all Hazaras) This cannot be a lie in any way and no one believes that all Hazaras spoke Mongolian. And it is still not believable that some 1000-man corps from in about 800 years ago are the ancestors of all Hazaras, and unlikely that the 8 or 10 million Hazara population was formed from that 1000-man corps in about 800 years ago. ] (]) 16:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::::Please read ], ], ] and ]. ] (]) 17:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::{{Ping|KoizumiBS}} One request |
|
|
:::::::::::This article contains info about the percentage of Mongolian and Turkic words. The info you added is only about the percentage of Mongolian words in the Hazara language, not others... It means that the information is not complete. |
|
|
:::::::::::So the previous is better, ({{tq|The Turkic and Mongolic words make up about 20% of the vocabulary of Hazaragi dialect.}}) because it is about the percentage of both language's words. |
|
|
:::::::::::With Thanks! ] (]) 16:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
More dishonesty and pov pushing to remove the Mongol aspects of the Hazara by Bravehm . Despite the source literally saying "Overall, our findings suggest that Hazaras have experienced genetic admixture with the local or neighboring populations and formed the current East-West Eurasian admixed genetic profile after their separation from the Mongolians." {{ping|Bravehm}} I hope you have a good explanation for this. --] (]) 12:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:That is because the information is outside of genetic studies. ] (]) 12:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
Same as above. ] (]) 14:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::What? ] (]) 12:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::You've edited your comment twice after I replied to it (which you shouldn't unless it's a grammar mistake, just make a new comment) and it still doesn't make sense. ] (]) 13:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::That info is not entirely true that the Hazaras only separated from the Mongols and have no other ancestors without them. ] (]) 13:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::It doesn't mean that their only ancestors were Mongols... and your personal opinion is still irrelevant, we follow ]. I've had enough of you and your socks. ] (]) 13:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::*Again, it is not related to genetic studies. |
|
|
:::::* "www.fsigenetics.com" is not ]. |
|
|
:::::*You can't accuse me of having sock accounts when I don't. |
|
|
:::::] (]) 15:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Keep making disruptive edits to decrease the Mongol aspect of the Hazara , they will eventually get reverted after your block, just like Iampharzad and co. If the SPI turns out inconclusive for whatever reason, I'll be taking those diffs to ]. ] (]) 16:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::I improved the article, not made any disruptive edits. |
|
|
:::::::Why and for what reason do I get blocked when there is no reason? I don't really know (Iampharzad) and this is my only account. ] (]) 16:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Another attempt at decreasing the Mongol aspect of the Hazara . ] (]) 12:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::My editing is to improve the article, not anything else and that editing of mine, has nothing to do with what you say. You only repeat the same words (Mongol aspect) for many times and trying to deprive me of the right to edit. Before reverting my edits pov pushingly, note what the facts are and what are edited to improve the article. |
|
|
:::::::::As a Misplaced Pages user, as you have the right to edit, I also have. ] (]) 18:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::You have a right indeed, but disruption is still not allowed, which you have resorted to once more Ill repeat it for the third time: those are not Baburs words about the Mongol invasion bit, open the source and see for yourself. ] (]) 18:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::Yes, the translator has said, so the information and its source are not reliable and accurate. ] (]) 18:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::According to whom? ] (]) 19:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::Not reliable because the author '''Babur''' does not say that, but the translator is mentioned at the bottom of the page. The translator's job is just the '''translation of the book'''. ] (]) 19:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::Thats not how ] works. Once again you removed info about the Mongol aspect. ] (]) 20:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::::The translator said those words without citing any sources. |
|
|
:::::::::::::::The info about Mongol aspect should not be removed if it is true. That information that is not reliable whether Mongolian, Turkic or Iranian, must be corrected or removed. ] (]) 20:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::::::Can you make up your mind? First because theyre “simply the translators”, and now because they “didnt cite any source”..? You dont know how ] works, and youre clearly removing to reduce thr Mongol aspect. Not worth waiting for the SPI, straight to ANI it is. ] (]) 20:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
In the Etymology section of the article it claims that Hazaras use the word "azra" to refer to themselves. I see it uses a secondary source for this claim. But a primary source on this topic I have discrovered, "The Races Of Afghanistan
by H. W. Bellew" records that Hazaras in the late 1800s never refered to themselves as "hazara" and it is external word that outsiders call Hazaras. They refered to themselves as simply what tribe they are from. So I believe this "azra" word, anecdotally speaking as a hazara, is unheard off ontop of being a novelty with no historical basis. This is all my belief of course backed by a primary acccount. Mioncraft (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
1. Under 20 and 21st century, I'm requesting to add further information about the Mazar-e Sharif massacre and link the wiki page to it (https://en.wikipedia.org/1998_Mazar-i-Sharif_massacre). The main source for the massacre is from Human Rights Watch.
2. I'm requesting to add a separate section about Hazara embroidery, which is an important part of Hazara culture.