| Revision as of 17:51, 25 May 2024 editTommygunn7886 (talk | contribs)185 editsNo edit summaryTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:28, 5 August 2024 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,678 edits Adding sockpuppetry block notice per w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Tommygunn7886 (using spihelper.js) |
| (20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== Please use edit summaries == |
|
== Blocked for sockpuppetry == |
|
⚫ |
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ] per the evidence presented at ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], but '''not for '']'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be ] or ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's ], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. ] (]) 13:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
|
] Hello. Thank you for ] to ]. I noticed that your recent edit to ] did not have an ]. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
The edit summary field looks like this: |
|
|
{{The edit-summary field/OOUI}} |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.''' With a ] you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}, and then click the "Save" button. |
|
|
Thanks!{{sp}}<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ] (]) 20:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Notice: Administrator's noticeboard report == |
|
|
|
|
|
This message is to notify you that a discussion has been created at the Administrator's noticeboard regarding your recent behavior. is the link to that discussion. ] (]) 04:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Discussion moved to the following location: ] (]) 04:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== May 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' for 48 hours from editing for contravening Misplaced Pages's ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's ], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-hblock --> |
|
|
:You failed to substantiate your grave personal attacks. The other editor seems to have neutrally summarized what a published source said. When your block expires, you are ''obligated'' to comply with ]. ] (]) 06:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Also ]. And in my opinion a dose of ], ], ], ]. Not to mention making the article say the . Take a step back and see how things have gone off track and come back and make it right. There are proper ways to pursue the changes you think should be made. ] (]) 06:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Introduction to contentious topics == |
|
|
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them''', a topic designated as ''']'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. |
|
|
|
|
|
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: |
|
|
*adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages; |
|
|
*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; |
|
|
*follow editorial and behavioural best practice; |
|
|
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and |
|
|
*refrain from gaming the system. |
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> ] (]) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
