Revision as of 19:18, 27 May 2024 editVeg Historian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users53,997 edits →"particularly in diet"← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:14, 15 January 2025 edit undoQutecumber (talk | contribs)8 editsm →Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2025 | ||
(29 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
]</center>}} | ]</center>}} | ||
== |
== "particularly in diet" == | ||
⚫ | I know this has been discussed a hundred times but... this isn't a dictionary, this is an encyclopedia. It's ok for a dictionary to reflect how people misuse words, but an encyclopedia should reflect what the word ''actually'' means. As I dig deeper all I can see is that The Vegan Society never defined veganism as a diet. They always defined it as a philosophy. ] (]) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
In the interests of fairness, shouldn't there be a section listing critiques and criticisms of the vegan diet from a health point of view at the very least? The only dissenting voice given in the article is from "Discrimination against vegans" and "Vegaphobia" which very strongly implies that only irrational and spiteful people would have any problem with this lifestyle. It just seems strange that nearly every other movement listed on this site follows a very standard formula of its history, its beliefs, and nearly always ends with a list of its criticisms written from a neutral point of view. Why should veganism be any different? ] (]) 03:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Phoenix | |||
⚫ | :It wasn't originally defined as a philosophy, vegan back then just meant "non-dairy vegetarian". Watson's first definition of veganism in 1945 was very simple, "''the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products''". Veganism as a philosophy was first defined by Leslie Cross in 1951. It's both a diet and a philosophy. Over time it was turned into a philosophy. Most vegans today consider it a philosophy. Nothing wrong with that they can call it what they want, but we can't deny diet has been an important factor. ] (]) 19:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
:You are correct, wikipedia is misrepresenting veganism, by suggesting that it is mainly dietary. The usage of "particularly in diet" is completely incorrect. | |||
:The correct definition is: "Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals" ~ The Vegan Society | |||
:The wikipedia definition has been incorrect for many years, and they do not appear to allow the page to be corrected. This would have been pointed out to wikipedia many times. After many years of donations, they will not be receiving any more of my money. ] (]) 02:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Your definition of veganism is incorrect, and misleading, it has been this way for years, and there is no doubt this has been pointed out to you many times, yet it remains incorrect. Why is this? Veganism is not a diet. | |||
: Agree with this - personally I have no issue with vegans or veganism in general but it is odd that this article is basically uncritical. ] (]) 08:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
::From the lede: "Vitamin B12 supplementation is important because its deficiency can cause blood disorders and potentially irreversible neurological damage". In general, ] are to be avoided. ] (]) 09:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::Under the subheading “Philosophy, religion, or politics” ] says: | |||
:::<br> | |||
:::“For topics about a particular point of view – such as philosophies (Idealism, Naturalism, Existentialism), political outlooks (Capitalism, Marxism), or religion (Islam, Christianity, Atheism) – it will usually be appropriate to have a ‘Criticism’ section or ‘Criticism of ...’ subarticle. Integrating criticism into the main article can cause confusion because readers may misconstrue the critical material as representative of the philosophy's outlook, the political stance, or the religion's tenets.” | |||
:::<br> | |||
:::Since veganism is both a dietary choice and a philosophy, maybe this applies here. ] (]) 01:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I heard what you are saying, but in this case, the criticism should be incorporated into the article. I don't trust people to list criticisms from a neutral point of view... I think having a criticisms section would invite trolls to vandalize the article, which is something we do NOT want. ] (]) 02:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I agree. Having a criticism section would invite the trolls and be very bad. ] (]) 02:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
The term veganism was coined by The Vegan Society, their definition is not up for dispute | |||
== Merge == | |||
"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals." ] (]) 02:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | |||
::The Vegan Society definition of veganism changed many times in the past. Their original definition of veganism in 1945 was "''the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products''" . The claims about veganism being a philosophy came years later. | |||
::The line on the article "''Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products—particularly in diet—and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals''", is accurate per the sourcing. ] (]) 11:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Ok, here is my suggestion for a lead sentence that reflects this without downplaying the other aspects of the lifestyle: "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of ] and the consumption of ] — and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals." If a reliable source is needed, I would suggest this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016330/ | |||
::::What do you think? --] (]) 22:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::] has a poor academic reception and has been accused of predatory publishing. I doubt many would agree the source qualifies as a good ]. ] (]) 22:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Ok, here's another source: https://www.academia.edu/3641785/Resisting_the_Globalization_of_Speciesism_Vegan_Abolitionism_as_a_Site_of_Consumer_Based_Social_Change | |||
::::::Is this a reliable source? | |||
⚫ | ::::::] (]) 18:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::::::Looks good to me.] (]) 03:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::FYI the modern vegan society definition is already cited on the article in the "definition" section ] (]) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Maybe link it but not completely merge ] (]) 05:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::FYI the contemporary definition of veganism, which has not changed in many years, is the definition that this article should commence with. Anything else is a deliberate misrepresentation of the truth. Veganism is not a diet, vegetarianism is, they are two completely different things. ] (]) 12:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | : |
||
::::Your profile on wikipedia clearly states your bias, as a vegetarian you should remove yourself from any, and all interactions with vegan pages. Misplaced Pages should be treating them as completely different subjects, since they are. | |||
::::Your claim of "objectivity" is a mockery to the premise of Misplaced Pages. Your sole interest is to pretend that vegetarianism is ethical, deliberately contriving similarities with veganism, and grouping the two together at every opportunity. It is a wonder you do not boast about blocking the correction of this page on your profile, there is still some room for more boasting... ] (]) 12:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Your account is likely to be blocked if you continue with that because you are far too aggressive and are making personal attacks. It's not worth responding to your false allegations and misinformation. I founded ]. We already have a definition section of veganism on the article and a lead that is well sourced. ] if you want your suggestions to be added to the article, but doubtful because we have already had this discussion many times before. Check the archives. ] (]) 12:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Begenuine8 has been indef blocked for making personal attacks. If any other users want to continue this discussion make sure to suggest good ]. As noted already in the "Definition" section of the article, we do cite the Vegan Society's modern definition of veganism. ] (]) 15:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== lack of criticism page == | |||
:No. Abolitionism and veganism are interrelated yet distinct philosophies. They complement each other. ] (]) 13:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
If Veganism is to be seen as a philosophy then they’re must be a page dedicated to criticism. This isn’t due to the philosophy being “wrong” however the page currently presents this particular idea as being unfalsifiable thus unable to be disputed. ] (]) 12:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::This merge proposal is also discussed at ]. I ''oppose'' this merge. There are a number of RS sources that have significant coverage of Abolitionism as a concept, which alone is justification for a separate article.] (]) 13:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
:"Must be" only if there are sufficient reliable sources on the matter. Provide them. ] (]) 12:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Prevalence by country: Germany, incorrect statement == | |||
== Personal health benefits == | |||
...better educated (people who ended their formal education with Hauptschule graduation)... | |||
I don't think it's accurate to say someone may practice veganism for personal health benefits. If this person doesn't have any other reason for eating vegan, what's stopping them from buying shampoo that contains animal ingredients or buying leather? Someone may adopt a diet that's ''coincidentally'' vegan for personal health benefits, but that's not the same thing as practicing veganism. ] (]) 03:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
In Germany, Hauptschule is not considered better educated. It's the lowest of the 3 schools kids attend starting 5th grade. ] (]) 23:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Please read the FAQ at the top of this page ] ] 06:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:I deleted the part that goes into detail about education and East/West Germany. The study is too small to draw any of these conclusions. ] (]) 09:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2025 == | |||
== "particularly in diet" == | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Veganism|answered=no}} | |||
⚫ | I know this has been discussed a hundred times but... this isn't a dictionary, this is an encyclopedia. It's ok for a dictionary to reflect how people misuse words, but an encyclopedia should reflect what the word ''actually'' means. As I dig deeper all I can see is that The Vegan Society never defined veganism as a diet. They always defined it as a philosophy. ] (]) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
⚫ | :It wasn't originally defined as a philosophy, vegan back then just meant "non-dairy vegetarian". Watson's first definition of veganism in |
||
CHANGE | |||
"Early vegetarians included Indian philosophers such as ], ], Acharya ], ], ], and ]; the Indian emperors ] and ]." | |||
... | |||
"Greek philosophers such as ], ], ], ], and ]; and the Roman poet ] and the playwright ]. | |||
TO | |||
"Early vegetarians included Indian philosophers such as ], ], Acharya ], ], ], and ]; the Indian emperors ] and ].<ref>For Valluvar, see Kamil Zvelebil, {{ISBN|978-90-04-03591-1}}, E. J. Brill, 1973, pp. 156–171.{{pb}}P. S. Sundaram, ''Tiruvalluvar Kural'', Penguin, 1990, p. 13. {{ISBN|978-0-14-400009-8}}{{pb}}A. A. Manavalan, Essays and Tributes on Tirukkural (1886–1986 AD) (1 ed.). Chennai: International Institute of Tamil Studies, 2009, pp. 127–129.</ref>" | |||
... | |||
"Greek philosophers such as ], ], ], ], and ], along with the Roman poet ] and the playwright ], are often cited as vegetarians or proponents of vegetarianism.<ref name="Dombrowski1984">{{cite journal |last1=Dombrowski |first1=Daniel A. |date=January 1984 |title=Vegetarianism and the Argument from Marginal Cases in Porphyry |journal=Journal of the History of Ideas |volume=45 |issue=1 |pages=141–143 |doi=10.2307/2709335 |issn=0022-5037 |jstor=2709335 |pmid=11611354}}{{pb}} | |||
Daniel A. Dombrowski, ''The Philosophy of Vegetarianism'', University of Massachusetts Press, 1984, 2.</ref>" |
Latest revision as of 01:14, 15 January 2025
view · edit Frequently asked questions
To view an answer, click the link to the right of the question. Q1: Why does the article distinguish between dietary and ethical vegans? Aren't ethical vegans the only true vegans? The article makes the distinction because reliable sources make it. See Talk:Veganism/Sources for the dietary veganism distinction for a selection of sources. For example:
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Veganism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Veganism at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Veganism was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
Sources for ethical/dietary distinction |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
"particularly in diet"
I know this has been discussed a hundred times but... this isn't a dictionary, this is an encyclopedia. It's ok for a dictionary to reflect how people misuse words, but an encyclopedia should reflect what the word actually means. As I dig deeper all I can see is that The Vegan Society never defined veganism as a diet. They always defined it as a philosophy. Countryboy603 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't originally defined as a philosophy, vegan back then just meant "non-dairy vegetarian". Watson's first definition of veganism in 1945 was very simple, "the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products". Veganism as a philosophy was first defined by Leslie Cross in 1951. It's both a diet and a philosophy. Over time it was turned into a philosophy. Most vegans today consider it a philosophy. Nothing wrong with that they can call it what they want, but we can't deny diet has been an important factor. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are correct, wikipedia is misrepresenting veganism, by suggesting that it is mainly dietary. The usage of "particularly in diet" is completely incorrect.
- The correct definition is: "Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals" ~ The Vegan Society
- The wikipedia definition has been incorrect for many years, and they do not appear to allow the page to be corrected. This would have been pointed out to wikipedia many times. After many years of donations, they will not be receiving any more of my money. Begenuine8 (talk) 02:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your definition of veganism is incorrect, and misleading, it has been this way for years, and there is no doubt this has been pointed out to you many times, yet it remains incorrect. Why is this? Veganism is not a diet.
The term veganism was coined by The Vegan Society, their definition is not up for dispute
"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals." Begenuine8 (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Vegan Society definition of veganism changed many times in the past. Their original definition of veganism in 1945 was "the practice of living on fruits, nuts, vegetables, grains, and other wholesome non-animal products" . The claims about veganism being a philosophy came years later.
- The line on the article "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products—particularly in diet—and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals", is accurate per the sourcing. Psychologist Guy (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, here is my suggestion for a lead sentence that reflects this without downplaying the other aspects of the lifestyle: "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products and the consumption of animal source foods — and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals." If a reliable source is needed, I would suggest this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016330/
- What do you think? --Countryboy603 (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cureus has a poor academic reception and has been accused of predatory publishing. I doubt many would agree the source qualifies as a good WP:RS. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, here's another source: https://www.academia.edu/3641785/Resisting_the_Globalization_of_Speciesism_Vegan_Abolitionism_as_a_Site_of_Consumer_Based_Social_Change
- Is this a reliable source?
- Countryboy603 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good to me.IWannaBeSedated24 (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Cureus has a poor academic reception and has been accused of predatory publishing. I doubt many would agree the source qualifies as a good WP:RS. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- What do you think? --Countryboy603 (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, here is my suggestion for a lead sentence that reflects this without downplaying the other aspects of the lifestyle: "Veganism is the practice of abstaining from the use of animal products and the consumption of animal source foods — and an associated philosophy that rejects the commodity status of animals." If a reliable source is needed, I would suggest this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11016330/
- FYI the modern vegan society definition is already cited on the article in the "definition" section Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- FYI the contemporary definition of veganism, which has not changed in many years, is the definition that this article should commence with. Anything else is a deliberate misrepresentation of the truth. Veganism is not a diet, vegetarianism is, they are two completely different things. Begenuine8 (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your profile on wikipedia clearly states your bias, as a vegetarian you should remove yourself from any, and all interactions with vegan pages. Misplaced Pages should be treating them as completely different subjects, since they are.
- Your claim of "objectivity" is a mockery to the premise of Misplaced Pages. Your sole interest is to pretend that vegetarianism is ethical, deliberately contriving similarities with veganism, and grouping the two together at every opportunity. It is a wonder you do not boast about blocking the correction of this page on your profile, there is still some room for more boasting... Begenuine8 (talk) 12:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your account is likely to be blocked if you continue with that because you are far too aggressive and are making personal attacks. It's not worth responding to your false allegations and misinformation. I founded WP:VV. We already have a definition section of veganism on the article and a lead that is well sourced. WP:CON if you want your suggestions to be added to the article, but doubtful because we have already had this discussion many times before. Check the archives. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Begenuine8 has been indef blocked for making personal attacks. If any other users want to continue this discussion make sure to suggest good WP:RS. As noted already in the "Definition" section of the article, we do cite the Vegan Society's modern definition of veganism. Psychologist Guy (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your account is likely to be blocked if you continue with that because you are far too aggressive and are making personal attacks. It's not worth responding to your false allegations and misinformation. I founded WP:VV. We already have a definition section of veganism on the article and a lead that is well sourced. WP:CON if you want your suggestions to be added to the article, but doubtful because we have already had this discussion many times before. Check the archives. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- FYI the modern vegan society definition is already cited on the article in the "definition" section Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
lack of criticism page
If Veganism is to be seen as a philosophy then they’re must be a page dedicated to criticism. This isn’t due to the philosophy being “wrong” however the page currently presents this particular idea as being unfalsifiable thus unable to be disputed. 2601:201:8E00:8740:180:C03A:A7B3:F4C9 (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- "Must be" only if there are sufficient reliable sources on the matter. Provide them. YBSOne (talk) 12:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Personal health benefits
I don't think it's accurate to say someone may practice veganism for personal health benefits. If this person doesn't have any other reason for eating vegan, what's stopping them from buying shampoo that contains animal ingredients or buying leather? Someone may adopt a diet that's coincidentally vegan for personal health benefits, but that's not the same thing as practicing veganism. 2001:5B0:4DD3:6908:E017:F7D7:D232:3C6F (talk) 03:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please read the FAQ at the top of this page EvergreenFir (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2025
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Veganism. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
CHANGE
"Early vegetarians included Indian philosophers such as Parshavnatha, Mahavira, Acharya Kundakunda, Umaswati, Samantabhadra, and Valluvar; the Indian emperors Chandragupta Maurya and Ashoka."
...
"Greek philosophers such as Empedocles, Theophrastus, Plutarch, Plotinus, and Porphyry; and the Roman poet Ovid and the playwright Seneca the Younger.
TO
"Early vegetarians included Indian philosophers such as Parshavnatha, Mahavira, Acharya Kundakunda, Umaswati, Samantabhadra, and Valluvar; the Indian emperors Chandragupta Maurya and Ashoka."
...
"Greek philosophers such as Empedocles, Theophrastus, Plutarch, Plotinus, and Porphyry, along with the Roman poet Ovid and the playwright Seneca the Younger, are often cited as vegetarians or proponents of vegetarianism."
- For Valluvar, see Kamil Zvelebil, The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India ISBN 978-90-04-03591-1, E. J. Brill, 1973, pp. 156–171.P. S. Sundaram, Tiruvalluvar Kural, Penguin, 1990, p. 13. ISBN 978-0-14-400009-8A. A. Manavalan, Essays and Tributes on Tirukkural (1886–1986 AD) (1 ed.). Chennai: International Institute of Tamil Studies, 2009, pp. 127–129.
- Dombrowski, Daniel A. (January 1984). "Vegetarianism and the Argument from Marginal Cases in Porphyry". Journal of the History of Ideas. 45 (1): 141–143. doi:10.2307/2709335. ISSN 0022-5037. JSTOR 2709335. PMID 11611354.
Daniel A. Dombrowski, The Philosophy of Vegetarianism, University of Massachusetts Press, 1984, 2.
- Misplaced Pages articles that use Oxford spelling
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Alternative views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- B-Class Animal rights articles
- Top-importance Animal rights articles
- WikiProject Animal rights articles
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- High-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- B-Class Effective Altruism articles
- Mid-importance Effective Altruism articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- Top-importance Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press
- Misplaced Pages semi-protected edit requests