| Revision as of 23:33, 15 April 2007 editChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits == Questionable image ==← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:22, 14 July 2024 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,577,659 editsm Substing templates: {{WikiProject Dacia Invitation}} per WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 July 7#Template:WikiProject Dacia Invitation. Report errors at User talk:AnomieBOT/TFDTemplateSubster. | ||
| (71 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Previous discussions are archived at ].--] 16:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="usermessage">On a ] — before I forget: ]</div> | |||
| == Issue? == | |||
| Previous discussions are archived at ].--] 12:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Frappe == | |||
| Ploutarchos, is there a problem? Are you mad at me??? --] 18:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No, why do you say that?--] 08:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It's a solution which has worked well thus far. Generally, the name "Republic of Macedonia is used, however" in articles relating to Greece, the UN, the EU, and generally articles pertaining to entities not recognizing a "Republic of Macedonia", the name FYROM is used instead. It has been modeled on the ] arrangement and has met with little serious opposition.--] 23:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You were silent. ;) --] 13:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Well, Im seriously opposing it. Maybe you "invented" the Frappe, and God bless you for that. But, trust me, it's also very popular in the Republic of Macedonia. So, this article also relates to Macedonia, please change the FYROM. --] 23:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Mail == | |||
| :Why don't you cite sources that it is popular in FYROM? After all, you are so set on demanding them elsewhere when it suites you.--] 23:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Ενταξει, θα φτιαξω ενα αυριο ειδικα για εδω. Καλως σας βρηκα! ] 22:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Articles == | |||
| :Ne te razbiram.--] 23:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| How do we create articles? | |||
| Your sources are illegitimate. As good as irrelevant. So, what kind of sources do you want from me? Menus from cafes? --] 23:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :My personal ]-opinion on the matter, and after having visited the country a few dozens of times for professional reasons, is that there is absolutely no remote idea of the beverage to any possible cafe-joint there. Yes, bring me ''one'' menu, from ''one'' cafe in the whole country to start. ]] 21:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for Mediation== | |||
| :: Well, I don't know where you went, but any cafe in Skopje has it. In fact, when I want to order a hot Nescafe I have to specify that I want it hot, otherwise they will bring me the Frappe. Im not claiming that we invented it or anything, I don't care who did, it's a coffee! I'm just saying that it's very popular. --] 19:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:80%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| | | |||
| |A ] to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, ]. | |||
| ::::::::''For the Mediation Committee,'' <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold">^</span>]<sup></span>]]</sup> | |||
| <small><div class="center">This message delivered by ], an automated bot account operated by the ] to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please ].</div></small> | |||
| There you go, a menu from a cafe franchise in Skopje: --] 20:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <div align="right">''This message delivered: 18:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)''.</div> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Afrika paprika == | |||
| I think it would be good to change the colour from turquoise as it's not clear. Please could you do this or show me cheers ] (]) 15:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Nah... that's even beyond Afrika's "standards". Cheers, --] 00:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Spor la treaba Plutarhule, de la prânz la miezul noptii... == | |||
| == You are the Stalker == | |||
| ...sau daca preferi, de la zenit la nadir ! | |||
| If anyone was to look at both of our contribs, you would be the one who qualifies as a stalker - not me. Not mention all of those reverts you made push a the same exact POV, racist, and biased context. You have previously reverted Ordu already so don't act like you are "refraining" from anything now. Making the Ordu revert for you would mean reverting 100 percent of my edits, which without doubt make you the "stalker". Go ahead and report me - I would love someone to pay attention to this. --] 17:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Ti-asi fi recunoscator daca ai putea arunca o privire asupra articolului Controversy about national identity in Moldova, creat de mine si modificat de Illythr (si poate de altii, pâna vei citi acest mesaj) si sa intervii cum socotesti mai bine, macar în domeniul formal (Illythr scrie ca referintele cer toate verificare, ce înseamna asta?). Sunt foarte începator pe Wiki englez care pare foarte riguros mai ales pe planul formal, uneori pierzând astfel din vedere evidenta, sau poate înnecând-o în amanunte si citate. | |||
| :Done.--] 17:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| În ceeace priveste Republica Moldova, amanuntele si citatele nu-s fara POV. Majoritatea tind a sustine procesul în curs de re-creare a unei identitati locale, nu ca in Elvetia si Belgia pe baza teritoriala, ceeace nu ar fi cu nimic deranjant (in Elvetia si Belgia identitatea tine de tara si nu împiedica apartenanta culturala si lingvistica la sferele germana, franceza, italiana sau nederlandeza) ci pe o baza izolationiasta si separatista (identitatea tine de proiectul politic de a desparti cu orice pret vorbitorii limbii Daco-Romane din R. Moldova de cei din România, dar nu se atinge de cultura rusa, ucraineana s.a.m.d. din Moldova). | |||
| == Bozcaada == | |||
| Multumesc pentru orice contributie. Cu bine, --] (]) 18:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Because the most common meaning of "Bozcaada" is the island, not the district. I'll leave a dab note a the top of ]. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 18:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==?== | == ? == | ||
| Oxi, i tourkia kai ta katexomena ine to idio. des edo ] "It is dependent on and ] only by ]". Turkey-Turkish. I tourkia ekane set up ta katexomena, min sinxizese ] 18:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Ειναι κανεις εδω? ] (]) 23:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] "The Turkish Cypriots are heavily dependent on monetary transfers from the Turkish government. Under the 2003-06 economic protocol, Ankara plans to provide around $550 million to the TRNC. The number of tourists visiting Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus during January-August 2003 was 286,901".<ref>http://www.holidayinnorthcyprus.com/eventsView.jsp?idNews=27</ref> | |||
| == WikiProject Dacia == | |||
| ] | |||
| <div style="border: 1px solid #c0c090; background-color: #f8eaba; width: 80%; margin: 4px auto; padding: .2em;"> | |||
| "The ''']''', due to its ], is dependent upon ] to facilitate its contacts with the ]". ] | |||
| ]Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient ]. Would you like to ] the ''']'''? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the ] related to these topics. We need ] expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more ]. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards! | |||
| </div> --] (]) 02:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| So had fun stalking? lol. So which incarnation of ] are you? :) ] 03:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 --> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| == re == | |||
| <blockquote>Unlikely neologism</blockquote> | |||
| I don't know, I run into socks of many users so often that I sometimes just assume.. Some users constantly resurrect themselves. I don't mind if you are him actually, as long as your current edits are ok and not inflammatory, it is fine :) Cheers! ] 23:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
| == Re: Kosovo == | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Eastern+Roman+Empires|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> ] ] 17:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| The Security Council will '''not''' decide to continue the negotiations. | |||
| Anything else (whatever it will be) will not restore Serbia's full-scale control over Kosovo. If Russia vetoes it (and it may abstain), or if there is no consensus (Italy says that the matter is futile to argue about) or if Ahtisaari's proposal is adopted ('''not''' very likely to happen), the Kosovo Question will just be further lengthened... | |||
| Considering that it's only weeks (or better, days) away, just keep onto your patience for a little while and everything will be revealed. ;) Cheers. --] 23:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == User page == | |||
| What on earth just happened to your userpage??? --] 18:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Domitius my friend, are You there? --] 23:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Tired of Serbian politicians. They've taken out two 3rds of their deadline to form the government and the mongrels can't even agree to form a Parliament (the 2007 budget runs out in exactly 2 days, on March 31; if they do not assemble it by then - no more money from the government). --] 23:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Contact Group already had its say about Kosovo '''''yesterday''''' (28 March). Result was: '''no consensus'''. | |||
| :::On '''3 April''' will be the session of the Security Council on which the future of Kosovo would be decided. | |||
| :::However this is the greatest of the tragedies - the country may enter ''a serious economic crackdown'' in just 2 days. --] 23:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Today the European Parliament voted and concluded that the European Union supports/endorses Martti Ahtisaari's proposal for the final status of Kosovo. --] 21:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == My username == | |||
| Yes, Mustafa Akalp-->Makalp. I want to learn;Why you interested in my reasons to change my username?.Regards<font face="Brush Script MT" color="red" size="4">]</font>]] 15:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == SALUT == | |||
| Salutari :) Mi`a zis Bonaparte ca ma poti ajuta. Sunt nou pe wikipedia si nu inteleg prea multe. ] 17:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Ok man. I need some help with those references. How do I add references? :) ] 17:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hi. I don`t understand how to set up the image copyright. Please check the image from this article written by me ]. ] 10:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | |||
| Can you please try to stick to the issues and stop assuming bad faith on the part of TR users at every single opportunity? I am sorry, but some of your comments border on trolling "we have seen this before" or "TR POV pushing" - I really would like there to be a much better cooperation attitude between TR and GR users. I had thought that TR settlement article was a non-issue: it truly seemed like a fork of Cyprus dispute. There was no secret-agenda or anything, and that's why I said "merge any meaningful content to Cyprus dispute". Why assume bad faith for no reason? ] 21:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Baris, do you honestly think any of my inputs on any AFD are motivated out of hostility for you or any other (pro-)TR editor? If you do, you certainly think highly of yourself. Let me assure you that anything I do is because I consider it fair and sourced. The Kurdish redirect and dab has been discussed ''ad nauseam'' and you accepted this compromise back in December. The article contains sourced material on a Kurdish genocide ergo it merits a redirect and a dab page so as to help readers find what they are looking for. My input at the settlements AFD again was because I considered it fair and sourced and still do. I consider that nomination part of a long chain of TR POV attempts to cover up the sourced fact that the bulk of the Turkish presence on Cyprus today are in fact colonizers from Turkey. Come on, stop playing dumb, you know what the effect of merging is. Sooner or later the word "settlements" will also be suppressed and replaced with something POV like "temporary guest workers' communities" (even if not by you, by someone else). The TR settlements article is sourced in my opinion and is relevant as a separate article.--] 22:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == BG nouns == | |||
| Err, I'm not sure: Bulgarian has almost no cases (only vocative, which is not so common, and some remnants), perhaps that's what they mean by writing this? Certainly, Bulgarian nouns are inflected for gender, number, definiteness and occasionally case. What you have given as an example of a case is indeed a "remnant" of the case system, but I have to say it's a bit artificial: nobody speaks like that for one, and this is not to be found in any dialects as far as I know, but otherwise everything with your observations is OK. '']]]'' 16:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I will insert a move request when I have time; for now, the tag is a place holder. ] <small>]</small> 23:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Move nominated. ] <small>]</small> 22:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Mutt Lunker== | |||
| I guees I have to thank you for attacking him with your sockpuppetry allegations. By tracing his edits to the only relevant article in his contrib list (Grigoriopol), I've found a real one . --] 12:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Makes one wonder how he came across that article. It's not the kind of article many people of his limited experience who don't focus on Transnistria related articles would have on their watchlists.--] 12:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I came across the Grigoriopol article because I largely use Misplaced Pages as a reference tool - that is what it's supposed to be for isn't it? There is a short wave radio transmitter site there and I was interested to see if there was any info on this (I have a professional interest - there wasn't info incidentally). I noticed some mildly loaded terminology plus missing definite articles, made an edit and, out of interest, put it on my watchlist. Later edits by Iliescu seem to have an element of bias as he is deleting refs and categories for Transnistria - however in looking further into the can of worms there seem to be other potentially biased editors towards the Russian/Slavic side, so I wouldn't single him out. Simple as that. As per my talk page, I'm perfectly happy for an administrator to ascertain I'm no sockpuppet. How do I facilitate this so the sockpuppet tag is removed with everyone happy? By the way I'm a bit concerned that Illythr is thankful for me being "attacked" - doesn't one assume good faith until there is genuine evidence otherwise? I think I might be on the point of retracting the assertion on my talk page that I'm not offended. ] 19:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I usually put is as "assume good faith unless there is reasonable evidence otherwise". A new user (seemingly) pushing the same views as a blocked user and proven skilled sockpuppeteer does raise eyebrows. Do you think I shouldn't have suspected, was I unreasonably after taking into account what I say above. If you want to remove the tag, feel free to remove it, as I told you.--] 19:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I don't want to just unilaterally remove the tag, especially as you evidently still suspect me as a sockpuppet. I just want this sorted out. Can you please tell me how to go about getting checked in the way you alluded on my page so that this can be cleared up? ] 20:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You're not unilaterally removing it if the person who added it says he doesn't object. For there to be an IP check one has to make a ] and I don't have the time to do that right now.--] 21:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: I think it'd be best if you remove the tag yourself, Domitius. --] 01:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Done.--] 09:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you... == | |||
| for the welcome. I will sure contact you if I have sth to ask. Greetings --] 14:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for welcome. ] 23:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Independent Kosovo == | |||
| It seems there isn't much support for it in the Security Council after all... --] 11:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :At least 60,000 Serbs living south of the river Ibar are determined to and ''will'' flee across the river ''the very moment'' Kosovo becomes independent. That would be unavoidable. However, keep on mind ''']'''. For the 50,000+ Serbs living there, all is ''not'' lost. The government needs not sponsor anything, most Kosovo Serbs actually want to get away from Kosovo - they are subjected to brutal discrimination, torment, frequent killings etc. for the past 8 years! | |||
| :Yes; that is why I supported the independence of Kosovo initially (I sympathize with the ]). | |||
| ::BTW Serbia will have not learned a lesson. For the moment Kosovo becomes independent, '''the ] will seize power in Serbia''' and we don't want that to happen. | |||
| ::Population changes? Like the ones they've had in BH in 1996? Considering that the lowest birth rate people in Serbia are Serbs, not much point in there. ;) In the 1970s over 80% of the population were Serbs; now it's below 66%. The only reason why they will retain majority in Vojvodina is solely because the Hungarians have a pretty low natural increase too (although not that low), so the other nations (Rusyns, Slovaks, Croats, Romanians,...) will not drastically increase (especially because they all too have negative birth rates). In the end, the general population of Serbia (minus Kosovo) is very rapidly ''dying out'' dramatically (emigration counted); not just the Serbs (only the Albanians have positive birth rate). --] 11:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Propaganda for secession of Republika Srpska - yes. But for Republic of Serbian Krajina... how? On which basis? There're even no Serbs there (practically)! Brainwash the local Croats into secession? :D --] 11:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Don't You know that '''600,000 Serbs''' (most) that lived were expelled in various organized operations in 1991-1995? Only about 150,000 remained and they form majority practically nowhere... and today a few returned. Nowadays there are 200,000 Serbs in Croatia (still form majority pretty much nowhere). --] 12:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==WP:NOT== | |||
| Please stop. ]. --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 17:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't understand. Were you just scraping the bottom of the barrel to find ''something'', ''anything'' you could lecture me over?--] 17:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Pointy, pointy Dirak :)) You create any more redirects and I will report it at AN:I that it was only because you hit 3RR.. Please learn how to be a good wikipedian.. ] 20:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::What do you mean?--] 20:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Your brand new article - read WP:STALK - it is ok to stalk if you have a strong suspicion that a user will act disruptively.. You created that article just because you hit 3RR on the dab page. ] 20:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The editor who did accuses ''me'' of stalking! Very rich indeed...--] 20:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I didn't accuse you of stalking, I said I had good reason to stalk you since you have been known to commit disruption per WP:POINT - you hit 3RR and created a new article - that is blatant disruption. ] 20:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::How?--] 20:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I want to report Domitius for continuing nationalist POV without refering to any kind of sources and as you said, Misplaced Pages is not a battleground. | |||
| If he continues like that, I think it is time to ban him. ] 20:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :How about the quotations I and Pax gave on your talkpage a few hours ago?--] 20:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Well, I have answered but you are obviously shocked about the truth, because you dont answer on my talk page. | |||
| And I have seen your edits, it is completely your own opinion and nationalistic opinion like Republika Srpska is a country and we bosniaks never existed before the arrival of turks and so on... | |||
| Because of that I want to report you. And I have seen your page on the serbian wikipedia and I can say that you serbs have some serious problems to issue with in the future... ] 20:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not Serbian and the only reason I'm not replying to you is because I'm impatient with Titoist brainwashing and propaganda re nation building.--] 20:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Ahahahaha! | |||
| Look, I am Muslim, and I hate kommunism! Please... dont call me Titoist. I am Muslim. ] 20:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Alkalada == | |||
| Domitius, you might wanna know this - ] is a meat-puppet of ''banned'' user ]. After he created tens of meat-puppets and kept returning from his ban, the administrators got tired and decided to let him go this time (] in particular). | |||
| I think he used his shot (You can even ask him, he doesn't even deny he's Hahahihihoho). --] 00:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image == | |||
| Did you make that map yourself? I actually find the "Roman Bureaucratic Republic" kind of ... funny. :) ] 10:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Easter == | |||
| Khristós Anésti! --] 15:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Αληθώς ο Κύριος! Χρόνια Πολλά! ]] 12:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Islands == | |||
| No, much more like the Greeks in Smyrna, Ephes, Constantinople and Pontus. | |||
| == Map == | |||
| ] | |||
| I'm now into drawing maps for Misplaced Pages. I've made a map of Serbs from 1910 on the Balkans. | |||
| ] | |||
| Compare it with the former Yugoslavia map without Slovenia. Yes, that's Albania. --] 22:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :And take a look at the map of the Kingdom of Serbia from 1910 (it's the "thickest" in there, you'll be able to fit it in). --] 22:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The other so dark to the southwest is the Princedom/Kingdom of Montenegro. --] 22:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::There. I added the borders between land and see, marked the international borders of the realms of Serbia and Montenegro and the border between the Ottoman Empire and the Dual Monarchy of Austro-Hungary. Clearer? :) --] 22:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Was my "essay" on Scanderbey OK? :) --] 18:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I tried, but Dimror chased me away; won't try it again. --] 18:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Serbs in Macedonia == | |||
| is their full story in short. Although it indeed is Serbian POV, the text tends to be rather neutral (it does not simply call the Macedonians "really Serbs" or anything nearly it). --] 20:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == BTW == | |||
| I redrew the map, is it clearer now? ;) --] 17:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{RFM-Request|Clement of Ohrid}} | |||
| == TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Casualties of the PKK conflict}} == | |||
| ] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> --]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 04:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello Aristovoulous / Slogankid == | |||
| Tell me, do you get tired of the whole sockpuppet/meatpuppet nonsense? ] 21:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Questionable image == | |||
| Domitius, could you possibly explain your recent upload of ]? It seems patently unencyclopedic - I can't imagine what useful purpose it could possibly serve on Misplaced Pages, and I can envisage just about every Balkan nationality seeing it as inflammatory. -- ] 23:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:22, 14 July 2024
Previous discussions are archived at /Archive1.--Ploutarchos 16:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Issue?
Ploutarchos, is there a problem? Are you mad at me??? --PaxEquilibrium 18:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- No, why do you say that?--Ploutarchos 08:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- You were silent. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 13:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Ενταξει, θα φτιαξω ενα αυριο ειδικα για εδω. Καλως σας βρηκα! Helladios 22:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Articles
How do we create articles?
Request for Mediation
|
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Clement of Ohrid.
|
I think it would be good to change the colour from turquoise as it's not clear. Please could you do this or show me cheers Tom (talk) 15:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Spor la treaba Plutarhule, de la prânz la miezul noptii...
...sau daca preferi, de la zenit la nadir !
Ti-asi fi recunoscator daca ai putea arunca o privire asupra articolului Controversy about national identity in Moldova, creat de mine si modificat de Illythr (si poate de altii, pâna vei citi acest mesaj) si sa intervii cum socotesti mai bine, macar în domeniul formal (Illythr scrie ca referintele cer toate verificare, ce înseamna asta?). Sunt foarte începator pe Wiki englez care pare foarte riguros mai ales pe planul formal, uneori pierzând astfel din vedere evidenta, sau poate înnecând-o în amanunte si citate.
În ceeace priveste Republica Moldova, amanuntele si citatele nu-s fara POV. Majoritatea tind a sustine procesul în curs de re-creare a unei identitati locale, nu ca in Elvetia si Belgia pe baza teritoriala, ceeace nu ar fi cu nimic deranjant (in Elvetia si Belgia identitatea tine de tara si nu împiedica apartenanta culturala si lingvistica la sferele germana, franceza, italiana sau nederlandeza) ci pe o baza izolationiasta si separatista (identitatea tine de proiectul politic de a desparti cu orice pret vorbitorii limbii Daco-Romane din R. Moldova de cei din România, dar nu se atinge de cultura rusa, ucraineana s.a.m.d. din Moldova).
Multumesc pentru orice contributie. Cu bine, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
?
Ειναι κανεις εδω? The Cat and the Owl (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Dacia
--Codrin.B (talk) 02:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eastern Roman Empires
A tag has been placed on Eastern Roman Empires requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
Unlikely neologism
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Constantine ✍ 17:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)