Misplaced Pages

Talk:Joan of Arc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:09, 10 July 2024 edit50.4.146.44 (talk) Swarthy: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:44, 10 January 2025 edit undoGuise (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,440 edits Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 January 2025 
(42 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 45: Line 45:
|otd16date=2024-05-30|otd16oldid=1226328197 |otd16date=2024-05-30|otd16oldid=1226328197
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=N|class=FA|vital=yes|living=n|listas=Joan Of Arc|1= {{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|listas=Joan Of Arc|blp=n|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=y|military-priority=mid|core=yes}} {{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=y|military-priority=mid|core=yes}}
{{WikiProject Christianity|history=yes|history-importance=mid|importance=high|catholicism=yes|catholicism-importance=Top|saints=yes|saints-importance=Top}} {{WikiProject Christianity|history=yes|history-importance=mid|importance=high|catholicism=yes|catholicism-importance=Top|saints=yes|saints-importance=Top}}
Line 53: Line 53:
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Middle Ages|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject France|importance=top}} {{WikiProject France|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Gender Studies|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Women in Religion|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Women in Religion|importance=high}}
}} }}
Line 73: Line 73:
}} }}


== Didn't she refer to herself as Jehanne? ==
== Mixing time-lines? Jehanne v Arc ==


In the page it says that she refers to herself as "Jeanne," but isn't this the standardized version of her name? You even have her signature in the page "Jehanne" ] (]) 12:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
First to note is how her name is spelled. You see other versions than Jehanne while D'Arc is used. No problem, it's history. I'm just saying it should be noted somewhere about how those two overlap (and maybe why). I consider this bit inconsistent. It probably is D'Arc, according to hand script, and the time-line probably started at the naming of Du Lys. There is concern -- hand script. I know what it says, but I know the brits won't settle on it, too. Otherwise, good work, above! ] (]) 12:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


:Have you seen all the different ways Shakespeare signed his name? More or less, orthography in every European language before 1800 was sporadically standardized at best. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff">&nbsp;‥&nbsp;</span>]</span> 12:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
== Swarthy ==


== Does the lede need to be so long? ==
She and her brothers were described as swarthy and marked as a blood horse in features. ] (]) 19:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

This article has a gold star, but I have no idea why so much biographical detail is needed in the summary of a ]. I am not going to attempt to edit it but as someone familiar with being concise I think it can be trimmed down to give a snapshot of her, without being so long. ] (]) 21:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
: ''she requested to be taken to Charles VII, later testifying that she was guided by visions from the archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and Saint Catherine to help him save France from English domination. Convinced of her devotion and purity, Charles sent Joan, who was about seventeen years old, to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief army. She arrived at the city in April 1429, wielding her banner and bringing hope to the demoralized French army. Nine days after her arrival, the English abandoned the siege. Joan encouraged the French to aggressively pursue the English during the Loire Campaign, which culminated in another decisive victory at Patay, opening the way for the French army to advance on Reims unopposed, where Charles was crowned as the King of France with Joan at his side. These victories boosted French morale, paving the way for their final triumph in the Hundred Years' War several decades later.''Why all of this detail in a summary? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It's four full-ish paragraphs, which is roughly what we aim for. The passage you posted is a pretty memorable narrative arc in her life. If I were to pick an FA to rag on its lead, it wouldn't be this one. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff">&nbsp;‥&nbsp;</span>]</span> 22:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

== Canonization rationale ==

The page states that,

"Joan was canonized as a Virgin, not as a Christian martyr"

Whatever the first sources says, the second source, which is the more important, Saint Benedict XV's papal bull,

DIVINA DISPONENTE*
BEATA IOANNA DE ARC, VIRGO,
IN SANCTORUM CAELITUM ALBUM REFERTUR

recognizes her virginity but does not state that as the reason for her canonization. Instead, the document catalogs her life and actions and affirms her motives as consistent with divine inspiration and that her life was devoted to God.

The claim of this sentence, thereby is inaccurate and should be either deleted or modified. Refer, instead to the opening paragraph of the Papal bull,

"coram hominibus definitive sanciehant eius innocentiam, fidem, sanctitatem et obedientiam mandatis Dei, ad quae observanda omnia sustinuit usque ad diram et iniustam mortem."

which translates,

"definitively established before men her innocence, faith, holiness, and obedience to the commandments of God, for which she endured all things to the point of a terrible and unjust death."

She was canonized for being holy, faithful, obedient, and a martyr. ] (]) 00:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

:This sentence was carefully worked out during the FAR. The sentence does not refer to the primary source (see ]). As is appropriate for Misplaced Pages, it uses secondary source the complex, detailed context of Joan's canonization-including the wording of the bull itself for readers, particularly the misconception that she was canonized as a martyr. The sources clarify why the opening of the bull declares Joan ''virgo'' and not the ''virgo et martyr''. As the article and secondary sources point out, it is a fine point. ] (]) 16:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 January 2025 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Joan of Arc|answered=yes}}
The page doesn't contain the date of birth, which is January 06th. ] (]) 21:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

:What's your source? Thanks. ] (]) 21:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{Not done}}: please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> – ] <sup>(] &#124; ])</sup> 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
::As the , medievalists do not endorse Perceval de Boulainvilliers' assertion about Joan of Arc's date of birth. Instead, they emphasize the symbolic value of this Epiphany, analogous to the “birth of a savior for the kingdom”. --] (]) 13:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:44, 10 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joan of Arc article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Featured articleJoan of Arc is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 16, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
April 3, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
August 31, 2006Featured article reviewKept
September 4, 2022Featured article reviewKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 29, 2004, July 7, 2004, July 7, 2005, July 7, 2006, May 30, 2007, May 30, 2008, May 30, 2009, May 30, 2010, May 30, 2011, May 30, 2013, May 30, 2015, May 30, 2018, May 30, 2019, May 30, 2020, May 30, 2023, and May 30, 2024.
Current status: Featured article
This  level-3 vital article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Military / Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.
WikiProject iconChristianity: History / Saints / Catholicism High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Christian history (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconReligion Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: European / French / Medieval
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
French military history task force
Taskforce icon
Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
WikiProject iconMiddle Ages High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFrance Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGender studies High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconWomen in Religion High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Didn't she refer to herself as Jehanne?

In the page it says that she refers to herself as "Jeanne," but isn't this the standardized version of her name? You even have her signature in the page "Jehanne" Tisthefirstletter (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Have you seen all the different ways Shakespeare signed his name? More or less, orthography in every European language before 1800 was sporadically standardized at best. Remsense ‥  12:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Does the lede need to be so long?

This article has a gold star, but I have no idea why so much biographical detail is needed in the summary of a WP:LEDE. I am not going to attempt to edit it but as someone familiar with being concise I think it can be trimmed down to give a snapshot of her, without being so long. Hausa warrior (talk) 21:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

she requested to be taken to Charles VII, later testifying that she was guided by visions from the archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and Saint Catherine to help him save France from English domination. Convinced of her devotion and purity, Charles sent Joan, who was about seventeen years old, to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief army. She arrived at the city in April 1429, wielding her banner and bringing hope to the demoralized French army. Nine days after her arrival, the English abandoned the siege. Joan encouraged the French to aggressively pursue the English during the Loire Campaign, which culminated in another decisive victory at Patay, opening the way for the French army to advance on Reims unopposed, where Charles was crowned as the King of France with Joan at his side. These victories boosted French morale, paving the way for their final triumph in the Hundred Years' War several decades later.Why all of this detail in a summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hausa warrior (talkcontribs) 21:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
It's four full-ish paragraphs, which is roughly what we aim for. The passage you posted is a pretty memorable narrative arc in her life. If I were to pick an FA to rag on its lead, it wouldn't be this one. Remsense ‥  22:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Canonization rationale

The page states that,

"Joan was canonized as a Virgin, not as a Christian martyr"

Whatever the first sources says, the second source, which is the more important, Saint Benedict XV's papal bull,

DIVINA DISPONENTE* BEATA IOANNA DE ARC, VIRGO, IN SANCTORUM CAELITUM ALBUM REFERTUR

recognizes her virginity but does not state that as the reason for her canonization. Instead, the document catalogs her life and actions and affirms her motives as consistent with divine inspiration and that her life was devoted to God.

The claim of this sentence, thereby is inaccurate and should be either deleted or modified. Refer, instead to the opening paragraph of the Papal bull,

"coram hominibus definitive sanciehant eius innocentiam, fidem, sanctitatem et obedientiam mandatis Dei, ad quae observanda omnia sustinuit usque ad diram et iniustam mortem."

which translates,

"definitively established before men her innocence, faith, holiness, and obedience to the commandments of God, for which she endured all things to the point of a terrible and unjust death."

She was canonized for being holy, faithful, obedient, and a martyr. Nicollo (talk) 00:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

This sentence was carefully worked out during the FAR. The sentence does not refer to the primary source (see WP:PRIMARYCARE). As is appropriate for Misplaced Pages, it uses secondary source the complex, detailed context of Joan's canonization-including the wording of the bull itself for readers, particularly the misconception that she was canonized as a martyr. The sources clarify why the opening of the bull declares Joan virgo and not the virgo et martyr. As the article and secondary sources point out, it is a fine point. Wtfiv (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The page doesn't contain the date of birth, which is January 06th. Saturnsbluebird (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

What's your source? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – macaddct1984 13:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
As the French article points out, medievalists do not endorse Perceval de Boulainvilliers' assertion about Joan of Arc's date of birth. Instead, they emphasize the symbolic value of this Epiphany, analogous to the “birth of a savior for the kingdom”. --Guise (talk) 13:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: