Revision as of 11:14, 4 August 2024 editChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,861 edits Reverted 1 edit by 103.216.144.105 (talk): Rmv blank requestTags: Twinkle Undo← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 8 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:India/Archive 60) (bot |
(379 intermediate revisions by 99 users not shown) |
Line 35: |
Line 35: |
|
|otd4date=2012-11-26|otd4oldid=524820236 |
|
|otd4date=2012-11-26|otd4oldid=524820236 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA |vital=yes |collapsed=yes |1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA |vital=yes |collapsed=yes |listas=India|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=Top |india=Yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Asia|importance=Top |india=Yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=Top |portal=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=Top |portal=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject South Asia|importance=Top |listas=India}} |
|
{{WikiProject South Asia|importance=Top }} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=High }} |
|
{{WikiProject Countries}} |
|
{{WikiProject Countries}} |
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors |user=Twofingered Typist |date=21 September 2019}} |
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors |user=Twofingered Typist |date=21 September 2019}} |
Line 51: |
Line 52: |
|
{{banner holder |collapsed=yes |1= |
|
{{banner holder |collapsed=yes |1= |
|
{{All time pageviews|151}} |
|
{{All time pageviews|151}} |
|
{{Annual report|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]}} |
|
{{Annual report|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 report|Aug 11 2013|Oct 20 2013|until|Nov 24 2013|Dec 8 2013|Dec 29 2013|until|Jan 19 2014}} |
|
{{Top 25 report |
|
|
| August 11, 2013 |
|
|
| October 20, 2013 | until | November 24, 2013 |
|
|
| December 8, 2013 |
|
|
| December 29, 2013 | until | January 19, 2014 |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{Spoken article requested|{{U|Sdkb}}|Featured article, and one that may have a higher-than-average proportion of readers who are English language learners}} |
|
{{Spoken article requested|{{U|Sdkb}}|Featured article, and one that may have a higher-than-average proportion of readers who are English language learners}} |
|
{{Annual readership |width=570 |days=182}} |
|
{{Annual readership |width=570 |days=182}} |
|
{{Section sizes}} |
|
{{Section sizes}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes }} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 75K |
|
⚫ |
|counter = 60 |
|
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
⚫ |
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|archive = Talk:India/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:India/Archive %(counter)d |
|
⚫ |
}} |
⚫ |
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
⚫ |
|counter = 58 |
|
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|
|indexhere=yes |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
== Should ] apply here == |
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 13#ভাৰত}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 17:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I was wondering if ] should apply to this article. If I am not wrong, the decision to not use the scripts were made because it was unclear which script was actually used / should be used in a particular case and whether the spelling in the Indic script is correct was difficult to verify. However this doesn't appear to be an issue here as the spelling and the script are official and well-known. Thoughts? @], @], @]. ] (]) 13:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 December 2024 == |
|
:Well of course it applies to this article, but if it didn't what changes are you proposing? It is already stated in a comment in the infobox that translations and transliterations do not fall under ]; the main reason for INDICSCRIPT is due to the ambiguity over which translations in which Indic languages should be included in the various India-related articles. ] (]) 19:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::@], had almost forgotten about this discussion, but I had meant to say that this ambiguity doesn't exist here, as we do know the official language and official script. So, should it apply to this article and should we be excluding the name in Devanagari script? ] (]) 11:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::PadFoot2002, search the talkpage archives for the many proposals to add the country's name in one or more of the 22 scheduled languages. IIRC the endless and frivolous discussions on this topic at this article were part of the impetus for adopting ] in the first place. Don't see any reason to revive that mess by entertaining exceptions to INDICSCRIPT, which has saved so much valuable editorial time. ] (]) 13:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::@], alright, there's no need for it here then. ] (]) 15:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|India|answered=yes}} |
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 July 2024 == |
|
|
|
India's population is 1,457,248,665 as of Friday, December 27, 2024<ref>{{cite web |last1=2024 |first1=India Population |title=India Population 2024 |url=https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/india-population/ |website=morldometer |publisher=worldometer |access-date=27 December 2024}}</ref> ] (]) 10:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{Not done}}: Worldometer is unreliable. ] (]|]) 10:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
{{Edit extended-protected|India|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Change the Spelling of Bhārata Gaṇarājya to Bhārat Gaṇarājya ] (]) 14:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 15:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}} I have done so as the edit which added back the schwa was only yesterday and was not discussed here; this does not mean either one is "correct", just that the "Bharat" spelling is what has been standard usage in this article. ] (]) 18:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Ref-talk}} |
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 July 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Reordering sentence in the lead == |
⚫ |
{{Edit extended-protected|India|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Change opening sentence to "'''India''', also called '''Bharat''', officially the '''Republic of India''' (ISO: Bhārat Gaṇarājya), ...". The country has two official short names as per Article 1 of the ], see ] . ] (]) 09:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*{{not done}} This is the English language Misplaced Pages. For example, at ], we don't say ''Germany, also called Deutschland, officially the Federal Republic of Germany...''. It is however mentioned in the infobox - as it is on this article as well. ] 11:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:*{{u|Black Kite}}: Then why a note is not added in this article as it is on Germany and Japan?--] (]) 07:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> I'm not sure what you mean; the ] article doesn't list the other official name, and neither does ], which doesn't say something like ''"Japan, also called Nihon,..."'' <span style="font-family:monospace;">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ]) 07:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minor edit suggestion: Currently the lead reads "It is the seventh-largest country in the world by area and the most populous country.". The latter fact seems by far the more notable of the two, so you'd think "It is the most populous country in the world and the seventh-largest by area" would be a more sensible phrasing. ] (]) 17:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Include the names of India in all languages as prescribed in the ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
like as is the case with ], or ], this is a solution that will hopefully not piss anyone off, whilst enabling the use of indic scripts again ] (]) 21:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
:I '''support''' this. The current sentence framing has stayed the same since before India surpassed China in terms of population. I think its due for a change now ] (]) 19:45, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:I '''support''' this aswell. ]] 20:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 January 2025 == |
|
:And why should we do this? We have ] and no Indic languages in the article for a reason; you'd have to make a very strong case for why we should include these languages, as the past arguments over the translations in different languages are not just about which languages to include, but also the "correct" translation and other issues. ] (]) 21:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::past disagreements have been because people were edit warring over which language to use...that's why ] even exists. it's because people were disagreeing in 2012 about what language to use in a page for a multiethnic Indian actor (see ]) |
|
|
::But that was 12 years ago and technology has come far, this is an appropriate solution, just like the EU and South Africa pages I have linked. |
|
|
::why should it be done? well, it's done for every other community page, and on top of that we have a solution now |
|
|
::i don't see a problem with it at all ] (]) 06:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::The only official languages of the Indian Union, as has been discussed in uncountable discussions in the talk archives, are Hindi and English. Please note that the Scheduled languages are "recognised languages", not "official languages". ] (]) 11:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::yes, so why don't we do that instead? ] (]) 12:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|India|answered=yes}} |
|
== Newly introduced changes == |
|
|
|
] (]) 18:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just change the language of "Hindi" to "Hindustani". Both are the same |
|
{{ping|Flemmish Nietzsche|Fowler&fowler}} Discuss here please. Let's not enter the 3RR territory.<span id="The_Herald:1721212450628:TalkFTTCLNIndia" class="FTTCmt"> — ] (]) 10:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
|
|
: Not done. Edit requests should be uncontroversial and backed by RS. ] (]) 21:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
:I've left a post on Flemish Nietzsche's use talk page. Those of us who normally maintain the page have been away for a couple of months. As you must know, editors here discuss even minor changes in the lead for weeks, indeed occasionally even months. Restoring this article to a last consensus version has been done before in the article. The article are majorly rewritten for Gandhi's 150th on 2 October 2019. (See the talk page discussion of the months preceding that date for a comparison with the casual discussions of the last month.) It had an FAR thereafter. It is Misplaced Pages's oldest country FA, soon to be 20 years old. I'm strapped for time. Pinging {{re|RegentsPark|Abecedare|SpacemanSpiff|Vanamonde93|Chipmunkdavis|Kautilya3|Joshua Jonathan}} ]] 10:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::PS No one is more aware of {{re|Flemmish Nietzsche}}'s excellent work here than I. ]] 10:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::I'm well aware why you are restoring to a consensus version, as I cite the same reasons when I have made reverts here in the past; however, as I have said I don't think mass-reverting many good edits is always necessary, as if someone doesn't work back in those good edits, the page quickly becomes out of date, which is what happened the last time you restored to a consensus version, ignoring many (now-archived) discussions where there was, in contrast to the Sanskrit edit discussion above, a proper discussion and consensus to make changes to avoid the page becoming out of date. The reason I reverted your recent edit so quickly was because I wrongly assumed it was a restoration to a much earlier version, (as in, before my and other's edits which updated the page) and any good minor edits since then have been worked back in to the article. ] (]) 11:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Perhaps in the future if substantial edits in ] are being proposed in a discussion here, could some of us (e.g. the people I have pinged above) be pinged, even use-talk-page-messaged? Thanks. ]] 11:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Sure. ] (]) 11:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*Thanks for resolving this amiably F&f and Flemmish Nietzsche! Just wanted to drop a quick note since the article is being reverted to (roughly) , that that version itself may need a review and should not be taken to be the version preferred or attested by me. Frankly, as I believe has been discussed previously, the article could use a proper reread to check for drift and need for updates if/when someone has the time to start the process. Cheers. ] (]) 12:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*The article already received two ] and the (larger FA) community peer reviewed version is over 13 years old. Yes, we have discussions and consensus establishments over time, but a full fledged review is very imminent. I'd like to propose an '''article review''' soon which can analyse the article in depth and prevent it from the overhanging FAR. Thanks. ] (]) 12:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:Not sure there is any overhanging FAR. |
|
|
*:Two years ago, or thereabouts, when a notice for improvements (to head off an FAR) was given on the talk page, SandyGeorgia said that only a few things needed fixing, and we fixed them. Two paragraphs, climate change and energy, were added by two editors. Around that time an Education section was added by ] and a Visual Arts section by ]. Earlier, in preparation for the article's second TFA on October 2, 2019, I had rewritten the lead, and added two new sections: Cuisine and Clothing. You are probably looking at the talk page milestones not at the discussions. ]] 13:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:Article reviews are useless. Who will bell the cat? What is their expertise? Are they MOS-mavens or subject experts? ]] 13:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*::With the caveat that I haven't read the article in a long time, I believe that most of it (lede, history, biodiversity, arts) etc should be fine and only need to be checked for changes since the last "stable" version. A couple of sections (eg, Economy, and Politics) may need periodic updates though, while keeping ] in mind. Cheers. ] (]) 13:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*::Thanks Abecedare. Very well summarized and explained. ]] 13:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:In my experience piecemeal improvements are usually better than grand reviews. Speaking of piecemeal, there are some changes that are probably needed: |
|
|
*:*The first ten years of Modi's rule are now widely documented in the scholarly literature: economic growth, infra-structure development, but also back-sliding democracy, crony-capitalism, more assertive religious nationalism, increased economic inequality and rising unemployment. They deserve a distilled mention in the lead perhaps. |
|
|
*:*The excess mortality in India during COVID-19, by far the world's highest (according to the WHO, Lancet, Economist, ...), probably needs a mention, though not necessarily in the lead. |
|
|
*:I think suggestions for changes, supported by scholarly sources (in order to meet ]) and by tertiary sources (for due weight; see ]) are usually better. As you will see from past discussions, even changing a sentence fragment can sometimes take weeks on this page. ]] 13:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*Hello {{re|The Herald}} Rather than an article review, why don't you review one of the sections ] has referred to above, or even a subsection. For example: ]. Would you like to review it? It would be really helpful. Thanks. ]] 14:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
**], Yea, I'll give it a go, if possible. Happy editing.<span id="The_Herald:1721394453181:TalkFTTCLNIndia" class="FTTCmt"> — ] (]) 13:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|
⚫ |
**:Thank you. Look forward. ]] 13:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC) |
|
Minor edit suggestion: Currently the lead reads "It is the seventh-largest country in the world by area and the most populous country.". The latter fact seems by far the more notable of the two, so you'd think "It is the most populous country in the world and the seventh-largest by area" would be a more sensible phrasing. IRN-Dumas (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Just change the language of "Hindi" to "Hindustani". Both are the same