Revision as of 11:21, 13 August 2024 editO.maximov (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,328 edits →Kelman's source characteristics: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:42, 16 August 2024 edit undoOwenX (talk | contribs)Administrators35,306 edits →Kelman's source characteristics: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #F3F9FF); color: var(--color-base, #000); margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"> | |||
⚫ | ===]=== | ||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}} | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''delete'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ] ] 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | ===]=== | ||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
:{{la|1=Kelman's source characteristics}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | :{{la|1=Kelman's source characteristics}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | ||
Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
*:I am guessing it is based on this "Kelman’s source characteristics identify three characteristics of successful marketing communications sources: source credibility. source attractiveness. source power" . I think this can be made into an article or merged into an article on marketing communications. We should give a chance to the author to fix up. I will ping the author now. ] (]) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | *:I am guessing it is based on this "Kelman’s source characteristics identify three characteristics of successful marketing communications sources: source credibility. source attractiveness. source power" . I think this can be made into an article or merged into an article on marketing communications. We should give a chance to the author to fix up. I will ping the author now. ] (]) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
*::] ] (]) 11:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | *::] ] (]) 11:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist -- |
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> | ||
:See https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=kelman+compliance+identification+internalization. It seems like this concept is pretty notable in the communications literature, with Kelman's original paper having over 6,000 citations. However, that doesn't change that this article needs to be renamed and rewritten from scratch (in my opinion). ] (]) 12:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | :See https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=kelman+compliance+identification+internalization. It seems like this concept is pretty notable in the communications literature, with Kelman's original paper having over 6,000 citations. However, that doesn't change that this article needs to be renamed and rewritten from scratch (in my opinion). ] (]) 12:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist -- |
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 05:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> | ||
*'''Delete''' This is quite mysterious. I am presuming that the 'kelman' here is ]. There is quite a bit about him in various sources and he is widely cited. However, this "theory" isn't mention in his article nor in the article on ]. It also isn't hardly found in G-scholar. A general web search shows that this seems to be a meme for marketing classes, but my guess is that someone other than him gave it this name. His own works are quite academic rather than "meme-y". So I say Delete and if someone editing either of the articles I mentioned decides to add this, that would be great. ] (]) 03:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' This is quite mysterious. I am presuming that the 'kelman' here is ]. There is quite a bit about him in various sources and he is widely cited. However, this "theory" isn't mention in his article nor in the article on ]. It also isn't hardly found in G-scholar. A general web search shows that this seems to be a meme for marketing classes, but my guess is that someone other than him gave it this name. His own works are quite academic rather than "meme-y". So I say Delete and if someone editing either of the articles I mentioned decides to add this, that would be great. ] (]) 03:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 13:42, 16 August 2024
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 13:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Kelman's source characteristics
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Kelman's source characteristics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have a good WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Economics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am guessing it is based on this "Kelman’s source characteristics identify three characteristics of successful marketing communications sources: source credibility. source attractiveness. source power" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-022-10349-3#:~:text=Kelman's%20source%20characteristics%20identify%20three,source%20power.. I think this can be made into an article or merged into an article on marketing communications. We should give a chance to the author to fix up. I will ping the author now. O.maximov (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 05:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)- See https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=kelman+compliance+identification+internalization. It seems like this concept is pretty notable in the communications literature, with Kelman's original paper having over 6,000 citations. However, that doesn't change that this article needs to be renamed and rewritten from scratch (in my opinion). Mathwriter2718 (talk) 12:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 05:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is quite mysterious. I am presuming that the 'kelman' here is Herbert Kelman. There is quite a bit about him in various sources and he is widely cited. However, this "theory" isn't mention in his article nor in the article on Marketing communications. It also isn't hardly found in G-scholar. A general web search shows that this seems to be a meme for marketing classes, but my guess is that someone other than him gave it this name. His own works are quite academic rather than "meme-y". So I say Delete and if someone editing either of the articles I mentioned decides to add this, that would be great. Lamona (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.