Misplaced Pages

User talk:PhilKnight: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:23, 17 August 2024 editAydoh8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,833 edits →User:Lildneyzm: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:51, 7 January 2025 edit undoToddy1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,729 edits Undid revision 1267897498 by Kibbutz1967 (talk) you are not allowed to do thatTag: Undo 
(315 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:




== Transnistrian IP == == You missed ==


… the master of {{noping|Abu4real1995}}: {{noping|Joseph4real1995}}. Best, ] 13:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. A third IP has appeared . IP range block is needed. ] ] ] 17:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


: No, I blocked the account, and then unblocked it following an unblock request. ] (]) 13:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
== Administrators' newsletter – July 2024 ==
::Well, after the unblock request was accepted, they’ve gone to nominate articles that I created (possibly because I filed the SPI). I don’t think that that sort of editing is considered as good-faith editing; it is disruptive at best. Best, ] 11:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::: I have re-blocked them. ] (]) 16:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== Assistance ==
] from the past month (June 2024).


"I am writing to request assistance regarding recent edits to the "Lovely Runner" article. editor Paper90ll has repeatedly removed information regarding ] achievment at the Asia Artist Awards. Despite these reversions, the user continued to rollback the changes and tagging me ] ]. I would appreciate guidance on how to resolve this ongoing dispute and ensure that the article accurately reflects the subject matter." ] (]) 13:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
]


:@] As I had reply to ] at their talk page on the same cross-posted topic. It's truly lovely to have ] and ] to start 2025. On '']'', ] that removed "{{tq|Material that fails verification be removed}}" per ] with "{{tq|WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH}}" in the edit summary however so lovely we have ] that apparently by following VERIFY, OR, SYNTH was ASPERSIONS as "{{tq|WP:BITE WP:FAITH}}"??? On the same article, the inline citation 48 nor 49 doesn't explicity stated that it's awarded for ''Lovely Runner'' either, further evidencing that my edit was aligned with Misplaced Pages's policies. On ], believed to be related to ] which our dear editor couldn't give me any acceptable neutral explanation to restore their preferred layout and also likely related to ] reverting their incorrect updates to the Infobox's count by going against the ]. In addition, rather perplexing that it was such a thing to discuss first for non-controversial edits when the edits made were per ] and didn't requires ]. Lastly, where exactly was the ASPERSIONSly the ] violations and/or "edit warring" violation on either articles??? I would pretty much like you as an administrator to give me an reasonable explanation on such behaviour otherwise this behaviour would continue by going around administrator's talk page and cross-posting the same topic. '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> 🎉🎆 ] 🎆🎉 <span style="color:#f535aa">(] • ])</span>''' 13:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
] '''Administrator changes'''
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{Hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|] (])
|]
|]
}}


::: I agree with Aoidh's . ] (]) 18:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
] '''Technical news'''
* Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. ] on MediaWiki. ({{phab|T6086}})


==]==
] '''Miscellaneous'''
Hello, PhilKnight,
* The ] is re-opening on 15 July 2024. ]


I saw that you closed this SPI case but the main sockmaster, Tuwintuwin, wasn't blocked at all. Was this an oversight? Just wondering as I've run into their editing this evening. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 08:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
----
:I just saw that they were indefinitely blocked but were unblocked only 3 days later! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 08:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 07:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:EN-Jungwon@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1231927808 -->


== Arjayay and DH85868993 keeps reverting my edits. ==
== Me again ==


Hello. First of all, I wanted to say I'm really sorry for my wrongdoings. Second, the two users keep reverting my edits for "Nurburgring". I put the correct info for the Nordscheliefe section, but the two keep reverting it. Click this link and you will see that my info is correct: Anyway, please stop them from putting wrong data. Thank you, and again, I'm sorry. ] (]) 17:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Phil. Hope you enjoyed your Fourth of July. Not sure if you wanted me to continue in the archived section or not. ] Regards, John. ] (]) 01:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


: Hi John, you did the right thing by starting a new section. Blocked for 3 months. Thanks. ] (]) 03:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC) : You should use the talk page - ] - to establish ], and not ]. ] (]) 18:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::Okay. Thank you. And again, I'm sorry. ] (]) 18:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)


== Hello!!! ==
:: Hi Phil. He might go back to this one, who knows. ]. Seems like a few more editors are involved with the reverts. Even another administrator with blocks. Nice to see, maybe he'll get tired. Have a good weekend! John. ] (]) 03:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)


I was wondering how to archive stuff? And can you also mentor me as en wiki is different from simple en wiki? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 08:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::: Hi John, blocked for 3 months. Pleased to hear there are other editors involved in this. He will give up eventually. ] (]) 06:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)


: Hi Cactusisme, you seem to have figured out how to archive stuff based on your user talk page. I don't mentor users, I suggest you find someone at ]. ] (]) 11:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::: Thank you, Phil. Fingers crossed until they go numb! Regards, John. ] (]) 05:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
::Alright, thanks!! ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::How about the bot? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::: Sorry, I don't understand the question "How about the bot?" ] (]) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::::@] Archiving bot ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::::: I have never used an archiving bot, so I am not the right person to ask. ] (]) 11:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::Anyone you know who uses it? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::: Looking at ] {{u|Rosguill}} uses archivebot and is currently accepting adoptees. You could try them. ] (]) 12:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::ok ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 12:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)


==Edit warring on ]==
== Another revert right after the warning ==
] who you recently blocked continues to engage in edit warring on other articles, particularly on ] where he is persistently disrupting ]'s contributions. He is also being hostile on the ], which shows that he is ''']'''. Surely this warrants a stricter block? ] (]) 00:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)


:I know of at least one ] (obsessed with me and certain articles, such as ] and ]) who is from the same geolocation as you. For the rest, the article's talk page speaks for itself. ] (]) 00:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Hey, I hope this message finds you well. I noticed your ] on the talk page of ] regarding WikiCleaner. I had previously requested that L.S. their own edits in good faith. However, an anonymous IP made the revert instead. Subsequently, L.S. . This behaviour suggests an unwillingness to engage in discussion and indicates potential . Could I kindly request that you take appropriate action regarding this matter? Additionally, please consider reverting the latest edit to encourage L.S. to address the discussion on the talk page. Thank you for your attention to this issue. ] (]) 15:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:Looking further in the socking, it looks like ] and ] could well be one and the same. ] (]) 00:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)


:: I don't see evidence of serious edit warring. The sock puppet investigations will be actioned by other admins. ] (]) 05:14, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:As I said many times to Michalis, I have no intention of to any adminstrator. My goal was to find a ] through the Talk page and that's what I did. just so he doesn't break any edit rule seems funny to me, but as I wrote to him on the talk page, it doesn't bother me and I continued to talk exclusively about the topic of our disagreement. I am surprised by his ] on me being punished(?) and also ] about the neutrality of the artcle and everyone agreed it was neutral.So its not only my opinion but other editors agree too. ] (]) 15:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Since the IP is hiding behind a proxy (blocked by Bbb23), then they could be any of my usual stalkers (hard to tell from a single comment). ] (]) 12:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
:: Also Michalis as i said in the Talk page:
:: You were ] by an Adminstrator once because you claimed I was vandalizing.Instead of apologizing as requested by the administrator, you left a ] on my page calling me a vandal again.
:: Also from what I can see there are quite a few ] about the way you edit articles.And some ] to be more constructive on Talk Pages.
:: I refer to these not to target you or to accuse you to this Administrator. But to make you realize that the way you operate is authoritarian with the result to lose your right and the patience of those who oppose you is wasted.Please be more constructive.
::
:] (]) 15:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
== IP User:27.145.140.187 needs a block again ==


] from the past month (December 2024).
Hi PhilKnight, immediately after the expiration of the 48-hr block you placed on the IP address ], they are back again falsifying information about band members on music articles (e.g. ], ]), this time with the usual User:Brettandelle habit of putting forward-slashes in the summaries of some edits. Could you block it again for a longer period please? Thanks! —&nbsp;] ] 09:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


: Hi, blocked for 3 months. Thanks. ] (]) 09:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

== Barry Wom and continued unnecessary removal of information ==

Hi, I'm a user who doesn't really edit on Misplaced Pages much, but me and a friend tried adding something to a page ]. Specifically we felt it'd be necessary to point out how nothing has been done with that movie despite it being part of a franchise with plans for more content in the future. However, this "Barry Wom" user keeps deleting the fact despite it being pretty worthy of mention (at least, IMO). I noticed Barry Wom has been blocked at least a few times for edit warring too in the past.

If you could maybe warn this user or block him, that'd be helpful. Thanks. ] (]) 15:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

: If he edit wars, you could report him to ]. ] (]) 15:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
::Barry Wom and another user named Indagate are refusing to accept that DC League of Super Pets' current franchise plans are unknown, dismissing it as "unnecessary" and "not notable" and that other pages containing the "It is currently unknown if" statement aren't relevant to the page, even though I showed them as proof. Here's the talk page for you so you can make your own decisions. https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:DC_League_of_Super-Pets#Movie's_Unknown_Future
::I'm a friend of this anon user who first approached you, and we are seriously trying to be civil here, but we can't find a way out, so do we have to try talking to other Misplaced Pages staff higher-up ourselves about it? If so, we might need some help on what other users to find. ] (]) 21:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

::: You should read ]. ] (]) 04:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

== Ongoing vandalism by IP user ==

Thank you for blocking ] for their continued vandalism, especially on Toyota articles. Just so you know, what appears to be the same user is doing the same kind of vandalism under ] while the other account is blocked. See for an example. Any additional help would be appreciated. Best, ] (]) 00:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

: Thanks. Blocked for 48 hours. ] (]) 04:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

== Jidarave ==

Hi Phil, I just want to make sure you've seen the message I left on ]: ]. Since Jidarave chose to remove the message rather than respond to it, it doesn't seem that they wish to explain their disruptive edit. ] (]) 02:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

: Thanks. ] (]) 05:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
::Hi Phil, I hope I'm not being a pest, but I just saw Jidarave's response on his talk page. I want to mention, in case you don't have the technical background to recognize it, that the text that they say they want to add is more of the same meaningless technobabble gibberish they've been spamming to the Reference Desk for years. I've been informed via email by another editor that Jidarave is likely a sock of ], and after reviewing the behavior of the numerous socks of that account, it seems likely to me. (I'm not mentioning the informant's name because they say they've been harassed by A134 in the past but I can send it to you privately if you wish.) ] (]) 01:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

== Second thought? ==

The ‘recently active’ tool says you’re… well… Recently active. Just wanted a second thought on something.

{{line break}}
{{tq| 14:23, 1 August 2024 User account Bryantkiser was created by Jbk932 and password was sent by email
(Can’t get original too work)}}

{{line break}}
Jbk’s only edits designate them a COI SPA, as far as I can tell, and I was thinking of giving them <nowiki>{{User alternative account|Jbk932}}</nowiki> on the new account’s Userpage so that, while we AGF and give them a chance to be a legit net positive, their origins aren’t missed if anything comes up.
{{line break}}

Obviously, making someone else’s Userpage probably isn’t going to go down well, but I was thinking there’s good reason for a little IAR to be applied. They don’t seem to be trying to ] either.

{{line break}}
Thoughts? ] ] ] 14:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

: Hi ], I think you're being a little harsh in characterizing Jbk932's edits as COI SPA, they were correcting an error, and were supported by the source. I think you should let them create a new account, and wait to see what edits they want to make. ] (]) 14:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
::Ah okay. Edit summaries threw me into thinking that, but I haven’t been on top form today. Thanks for getting some sense into me. {{thumbsup}} ] ] ] 19:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

== User talk:1.238.43.243 ==

Hi, could we also have the history of this page (mostly) revdel'd to remove the death threats, and this troll's ability to copy/paste/restore them over and over? - ] (]) 18:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

: Hi Adolphus79, I have revision deleted the discussion. ] (]) 18:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

== Block it ==

AAlertBot This bot has been messing up lately. So request you to block it. ] (]) 09:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

: Hi, looking at ] I don't see anything wrong. Could you describe what it is doing wrong? ] (]) 09:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

== Defamation of a living person on Misplaced Pages ==

Hi, I'd like to ask regarding this edit: . Clearly, this repeatedly inserted claim is false information and not based on reliable sources; it is part of an online antisemitic harassment campaign against this person, as detailed here: . I edited the article to remove the incorrect claim. Is there something else that can be done to prevent this from happening again? ] (]) 06:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

: Hi, I have left the user who added the claim a warning about unsourced content. They can be blocked if they do this repeatedly. ] (]) 13:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
::Ok, much appreciated. ] (]) 17:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

== Administrators' newsletter – August 2024 ==

] from the past month (July 2024).
<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap"> <div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em"> <div style="flex: 1 0 20em">


] '''Administrator changes''' ] '''Administrator changes'''
:] ] :] ]
:] {{Hlist|class=inline :] {{hlist|class=inline
|] |]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}} }}


] '''Interface administrator changes''' ] '''CheckUser changes'''
:] ] :] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div> </div>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em"> <div style="flex: 1 0 20em">

] ]


] '''CheckUser changes''' ] '''Oversight changes'''
:] ] :] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


</div> </div>
</div> </div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news''' ] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
* ] may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may ] when appropriate.
* Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via ]. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.


] '''Arbitration''' ] '''Arbitration'''
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.
* The Arbitration Committee ] the following administrators to the ]: {{noping|Bilby}}, {{noping|Extraordinary Writ}}

] '''Miscellaneous'''
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]


---- ----
Line 180: Line 126:
}}}} }}}}
<!-- <!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)</small>}} -->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1238586059 --> <!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->
== Happy New Year! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:golden; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
== Deletion of ] ==
'''Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages in 2024! Wishing you a Very happy and productive 2025! ♦ ] (]) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

</div>
I don't think it should have been deleted. First off, I don't think "attack page" applies to redirects. Furthermore, the question has received extensive media coverage, quite a little bit of which made it into the JD Vance article. Lastly, I think it should have been RfDed rather than speedily deleted. <sub style="border:1px solid #FFCC00;">]</sub> 12:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

:Hi pbp, thank you for your polite message. I'm fairly certain that attack page applies to redirects. However, I recognize your other arguments are legitimate. That said, I stand by my decision to delete the redirect. I suggest you file at ] to request an overturn of my decision. ] (]) 14:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

== Disruption at ] ==

Would you also semi-protect this page for a day? If you're hesitant to protect an arbitration page, note that I'm a ] (and the only clerk currently online). ]&nbsp;] 23:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)


== Help to block sockpupperty ==
: {{done}}. ] (]) 23:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)


Hi admin can you remove ] this account was an sockpuppet of ] ] (]) 04:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
== ] ==


:At least I'm not vandalism like you ] (]) 05:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, are you (or a ]) able to block ]'s TPA? They're using it to self promote after being blocked by you. Thanks! ]]<sup>]]</sup> 04:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
::vandals? Even you are still used your bias results,vandals Majapahit-Sundanese conflict,even the Sack of Singapore? ] (]) 05:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::when? ] (]) 05:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::25 December 2024 why you still forget about it huh? ] (]) 05:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I don't mind if you gonna tried many bias results in many article about Konfrontasi and tried to make many battles in Malay-Portuguese conflict ] (]) 05:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::and? ] (]) 05:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::bro tried to be ligma, now even you still want to make many battles but still get removed by the administration now ] (]) 05:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::who ligma? ] (]) 05:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:That's the old account, why should it be leveraged again? And again, what's wrong with the account now, what's the point? ] (]) 05:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::I don't care if you still tried to conviced many wikipedian admin about those edits it was your old account,and those admin still tried to block you, even your block still not expired if those admins was blocked you ] (]) 05:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I created a new account ] (]) 05:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::well goodbye if those admin still wanted to block your account they will searched your account even your new account to blocked it ] (]) 05:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
::::and those block was not have the expired date if you still tried to make many account ] (]) 05:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::why do you have to be busy managing my account? ] (]) 05:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:51, 7 January 2025

Archive
Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118

edit


You missed

… the master of Abu4real1995: Joseph4real1995. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

No, I blocked the account, and then unblocked it following an unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Well, after the unblock request was accepted, they’ve gone to nominate articles that I created (possibly because I filed the SPI). I don’t think that that sort of editing is considered as good-faith editing; it is disruptive at best. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I have re-blocked them. PhilKnight (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Assistance

"I am writing to request assistance regarding recent edits to the "Lovely Runner" article. editor Paper90ll has repeatedly removed information regarding Lovely Runner achievment at the Asia Artist Awards. Despite these reversions, the user continued to rollback the changes and tagging me Ultraviolet Rollback. I would appreciate guidance on how to resolve this ongoing dispute and ensure that the article accurately reflects the subject matter." Puchicatos (talk) 13:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@PhilKnight As I had reply to Aoidh at their talk page on the same cross-posted topic. It's truly lovely to have WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:PERSONALATTACKS to start 2025. On Lovely Runner, my edit that removed "Material that fails verification be removed" per WP:VERIFY with "WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH" in the edit summary however so lovely we have this edit by our dear editor that apparently by following VERIFY, OR, SYNTH was ASPERSIONS as "WP:BITE WP:FAITH"??? On the same article, the inline citation 48 nor 49 doesn't explicity stated that it's awarded for Lovely Runner either, further evidencing that my edit was aligned with Misplaced Pages's policies. On List of awards and nominations received by Byeon Woo-seok, believed to be related to this discussion which our dear editor couldn't give me any acceptable neutral explanation to restore their preferred layout and also likely related to this edit reverting their incorrect updates to the Infobox's count by going against the documentation. In addition, rather perplexing that it was such a thing to discuss first for non-controversial edits when the edits made were per WP:BOLD and didn't requires WP:CONSENSUS. Lastly, where exactly was the ASPERSIONSly the WP:3RR violations and/or "edit warring" violation on either articles??? I would pretty much like you as an administrator to give me an reasonable explanation on such behaviour otherwise this behaviour would continue by going around administrator's talk page and cross-posting the same topic. — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 13:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I agree with Aoidh's comments. PhilKnight (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuwintuwin/Archive

Hello, PhilKnight,

I saw that you closed this SPI case but the main sockmaster, Tuwintuwin, wasn't blocked at all. Was this an oversight? Just wondering as I've run into their editing this evening. Liz 08:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I just saw that they were indefinitely blocked but were unblocked only 3 days later! Liz 08:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Arjayay and DH85868993 keeps reverting my edits.

Hello. First of all, I wanted to say I'm really sorry for my wrongdoings. Second, the two users keep reverting my edits for "Nurburgring". I put the correct info for the Nordscheliefe section, but the two keep reverting it. Click this link and you will see that my info is correct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsLi7HgSuhI Anyway, please stop them from putting wrong data. Thank you, and again, I'm sorry. 2603:8000:99F0:93A0:9932:FB79:1D30:444B (talk) 17:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

You should use the talk page - Talk:Nürburgring - to establish consensus, and not edit war. PhilKnight (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you. And again, I'm sorry. 2603:8000:99F0:93A0:9932:FB79:1D30:444B (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello!!!

I was wondering how to archive stuff? And can you also mentor me as en wiki is different from simple en wiki? Cactus🌵 08:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cactusisme, you seem to have figured out how to archive stuff based on your user talk page. I don't mentor users, I suggest you find someone at Misplaced Pages:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters. PhilKnight (talk) 11:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Alright, thanks!! Cactus🌵 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
How about the bot? Cactus🌵 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand the question "How about the bot?" PhilKnight (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
@PhilKnight Archiving bot Cactus🌵 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I have never used an archiving bot, so I am not the right person to ask. PhilKnight (talk) 11:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Anyone you know who uses it? Cactus🌵 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Looking at Misplaced Pages:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters Rosguill uses archivebot and is currently accepting adoptees. You could try them. PhilKnight (talk) 12:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
ok Cactus🌵 12:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Edit warring on Battle of Sidi Brahim

M.Bitton who you recently blocked continues to engage in edit warring on other articles, particularly on Battle of Sidi Brahim where he is persistently disrupting Robinvp11's contributions. He is also being hostile on the talk page, which shows that he is treating editing as a battleground. Surely this warrants a stricter block? 185.165.190.128 (talk) 00:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

I know of at least one highly disruptive sock (obsessed with me and certain articles, such as Dominican Restoration War and Dominican War of Independence) who is from the same geolocation as you. For the rest, the article's talk page speaks for itself. M.Bitton (talk) 00:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Looking further in the socking, it looks like Norprobr and Phạm Văn Rạng could well be one and the same. M.Bitton (talk) 00:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
I don't see evidence of serious edit warring. The sock puppet investigations will be actioned by other admins. PhilKnight (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Since the IP is hiding behind a proxy (blocked by Bbb23), then they could be any of my usual stalkers (hard to tell from a single comment). M.Bitton (talk) 12:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages in 2024! Wishing you a Very happy and productive 2025!  ♦ Maliner (talk) 02:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Help to block sockpupperty

Hi admin can you remove User:Kibbutz1967 this account was an sockpuppet of User:Mesbmr6710 Stratospheric78 (talk) 04:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

At least I'm not vandalism like you Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
vandals? Even you are still used your bias results,vandals Majapahit-Sundanese conflict,even the Sack of Singapore? Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
when? Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
25 December 2024 why you still forget about it huh? Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I don't mind if you gonna tried many bias results in many article about Konfrontasi and tried to make many battles in Malay-Portuguese conflict Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
and? Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
bro tried to be ligma, now even you still want to make many battles but still get removed by the administration now Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
who ligma? Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
That's the old account, why should it be leveraged again? And again, what's wrong with the account now, what's the point? Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I don't care if you still tried to conviced many wikipedian admin about those edits it was your old account,and those admin still tried to block you, even your block still not expired if those admins was blocked you Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I created a new account Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
well goodbye if those admin still wanted to block your account they will searched your account even your new account to blocked it Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
and those block was not have the expired date if you still tried to make many account Stratospheric78 (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
why do you have to be busy managing my account? Kibbutz1967 (talk) 05:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)