| Revision as of 00:27, 3 September 2024 editSymphony Regalia (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,175 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits OneClickArchived "Is this an adequate source?" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53 | ||
| (94 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | ||
| == Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance == | |||
| == Question == | |||
| I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for ]. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. ] (]) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Is Wikidata a reliable source for Misplaced Pages? | |||
| Per this added by user:Prakashs27. | |||
| User:Prakashs27 has also been adding birth, death, battle dates, and coronation dates using questionable sources, when they actually use sources. They have also used . | |||
| They added a date for the , that discusses the possible dates of battle. AND, taking the date they decided upon(19 July 711), changed the date of death for , with no references. | |||
| User:Prakashs27 has warnings on their talk page for their editing from 6 different editors. --] (]) 02:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Almost forgot! User:Prakashs27 also using Cynthia Talbot (2015). ''The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj and the Indian Past, 1200–2000'', p. 47, except that Talbot makes no mention of any date for the battle. to which I removed the date and the misrepresentation of the Talbot source. In response user:Prakashs27 used Wikidata for a source(as mentioned above). --] (]) 03:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Extended Confirmed on ] == | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Yevgeny Prigozhin}} | |||
| hey there - i don't intend to make any edits, but i was wondering if the page ] is still intended to be indefinitely extended confirmed protected. it was protected by you in february of 2023 due to an edit war going on at the time, and is still protected. is this intentionally left as extended confirmed or is it around the right time to remove those restrictions? ] (]) 05:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :See the . This has also been logged in ]. Per the wording of ] nobody who is not extended confirmed can edit articles which fall in this topic area. So this page is unlikely to be free of ECP any time soon. (Prigozhin, though he is deceased, remains clearly associated with the Ukraine war, so the Ukraine sanctions still apply). You are still free to propose changes on the article talk page. ] (]) 04:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::ooh, gotcha! yeah, i don't intend to edit the page but i've been curious about learning these wikipedia policies - thank you! ] (]) 01:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == SPI case(s) == | |||
| Hello Ed; hope you are doing well. | |||
| The userpage of ], who was identified as a sockpuppet in ], remains to be tagged per ]. A clerk will probably notice it before the case is archived, but I thought of letting you know. | |||
| I would also like to ask whether the rest of the accounts mentioned in the comment section of the aforementioned case – ] and ] – were checked for "possible" links? They are reported in a different case (see ]), but the evidence in relation to ], is compelling. There is some additional suspicious activity that wasn't mentioned; such as Lumbarschen appearing a day after the creation of ] by Henrikurti, to contest its deletion (]). Though, this is not necessarily due to sockpuppetry; there are additional possibilities to consider. ] (]) 14:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == HerbLightman alias == | |||
| *{{userlinks|HerbLightman}} | |||
| *{{userlinks|49Bottles}} | |||
| Hi Ed, | |||
| Sorry to bug you. I recently cleaned out a filmography of ]. I feel like an editor with similar editing patterns of ] has come in and made changes to more European genre filmography articles through the ] account. Not sure if it needs more time or eyes, but figured I'd point it out. Thanks. ] (]) 18:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Whups looks like we both did this around the same time . Hope it does not complicate things. ] (]) 22:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Semi-protection of ] == | |||
| Hi, as the page falls under a contentious topic with a 30-500 restriction (]), I am curious as to why it wasn't extended-protected per arbitration enforcement? Also, you noted in the ] section the existence of a partial rangeblock (on a much wider range), but I am confused as it doesn't seem to be related to that incident at all. Thanks a lot! ] (] · ]) 18:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Upgraded to indefinite EC protection per your suggestion. The earlier range block was mentioned for reference; perhaps it's just a coincidence. ] (]) 18:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks a lot! Yeah, the disruption that led to the range block seems to have been pretty unrelated. ] (] · ]) 19:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Al Madeena Cherpulassery}} | |||
| Could this be deleted as already was, sock got back after while: | |||
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Al_Madeena_Cherpulassery&action=history ] (]) 19:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The redirect is currently deleted. Another admin has indefinitely protected the redirect against re-creation except by ] editors. I hope that will be sufficient. ] (]) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| *{{userlinks|Symphony_Regalia}} | |||
| User was from the Japanese wiki for without consulting the Talk page first (this disruptive cross wiki activity started roughly a month after their initial edits on the ), ], harassing JP editors who were against their behaviour with , as well as maliciously ] ] of said editors (which coincidentally happened during the edit block request). | |||
| This user was under the scrutiny of an ] and an ], both of which were ignored by said user, except for the socks. User was continuing their edits on the English pages during the duration of both incidences. This user engages in aggressive POV-pushing and does not engage in Talks nor do they present information when pressed, as noted ], and ]. I would like to know what measures could be taken against this user. ] (]) 23:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :This IP user is an involved editor spreading false allegations. A CheckUser ] and the sock puppet allegations were not substantiated. | |||
| :I was blocked based on a comment request where ] gave input, but I believe that to be for reasons of offending Japanese sensibilities. On Japanese Misplaced Pages I have had a target on my back for a while for attempting to bring the Nanking Massacre article in line with the English counterpart (on Japanese Misplaced Pages the ] is named "''The Nanking Incident''" and many of the genocide allegations are scrubbed from the article). | |||
| :None of this is relevant as I haven't edited on Japanese Misplaced Pages in a while. ] (]) 00:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance
I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for Hideki Tojo. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)