| Revision as of 22:59, 20 April 2007 edit195.56.91.23 (talk) Pleae cool down + response← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:05, 15 December 2023 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,107 editsm Fixing Lint error (Task 27)Tag: paws [2.2] | ||
| (132 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I have unblocked you, but keep in mind that this is your last chance. You should be much more careful from now on with your behaviour, because it's much easier to get yourself blocked with your blocking history. Also, not that it's not acceptable to use sockpuppets to edit the same set of articles, even if you don't use them for "disruptive behaviour". ] 10:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image source problem with Image:BA16thcentury.jpg== | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
| As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. | |||
| It is really encouraging that you edit here, in spite of all the wars. ] 22:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 14:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ]]] 14:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == nuclear power plants == | |||
| ==Speedy deletion== | |||
| Perhaps something like ] could be written for Slovakia, as a complement. Just thinking. ] 22:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag --> | |||
| I have reverted your edit of the article. The website mentioning "dělňas" is somebody's blog, and as a matter of fact it's inaccurate - the Čapek's article in Lidové noviny says something quite different (, ). Karel Čapek intended to call the creatures "laboři", but he didn't like the word himself. When he told his brother Josef that he didn't know how to call them, Josef suggested "roboti". And of course, the word "robota" exists in the Czech language as well; in modern Czech, it normally refers to ]. (I already stated that in the article's ].) Regards, ] 07:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Quote box | |||
| | quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ]. | |||
| | source = Thank you. | |||
| | width = 20% | |||
| | align = right | |||
| }} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ''']''', requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the ], because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read ], particularly item 11, as well as ]. | |||
| If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of ''']''' and leave a note on ''']''' explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any ] from independent ] to ensure that the article will be ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.]<!-- Template:Spam-warn --> ] ] 15:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I am well aware of the use of "robota" in most European languages. The problem is that the blog mentions an article from 1930 (i.e. another article), that I read the same story several times elsewhere in he past and that the cited article does not deal with the origin and certainly does not aim at mentioning all alternatives. So, unless this is someone's huge hoax, what the blog says is correct. Since the old newspaper is not accessible online, I do not know how to prove this, someone would have to go to the National Library (in Prague). ] 14:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I wouldn't call it a hoax; rather, a case of somebody making an inaccurate statement and others repeating it. (After all, this is exactly how urban legends and other rumors and misinformation spread.) Also, I find it hard to believe that Čapek would write twice in Lidové noviny on the same topic, once in 1930 and again in 1933, and each time telling basically the same story but with significant differences.<p>I <i>also</i> remember reading the story about Josef Čapek being the true inventor of the word (such as in Ludvík Souček's "Opravník oblíbených omylů"), and each time the original word was "labor", not "dělňas". I tried on the Internet, finding: | |||
| **Copies of the Misplaced Pages article | |||
| **The blog | |||
| **Other websites copying the blog's statements | |||
| **An article in a Slovak newspaper "Slovo" making the same claim - and, by chance, written by the same person as the blog | |||
| **And the readers' responses to the blog, making the same counter-arguments as I did. | |||
| *I do have a valid reference for the original Čapek's word (quoting the author's newspaper article). Do you? (I am going to copy this discussion to ]; feel free to comment there.) - ] 16:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Slovak "motorroads" == | |||
| Once again, your argument is only "valid", because I do not have the article and the sources where the opposite is written and I am not going to invest my time into this. Secondly, the above text does not contradict what the blog says (there could have been and surely were more alternatives and the author certainly did not take notes of this, because he did not know that this would become relevant one day). Thirdly, the argument that there could not be two articles on a topic is NOT valid and is laughable. Fourthly, the author of the blog as a person is reliable, btw, he can be nevertheless wrong of course. Fifthy, look carefully at the story - it is so detailed and logical that either this is a hoax or it is correct, it cannot be an "error". I hope you are able to understand point five at least. What I plan to do - like aways - is to wait till I come across about the story somewhere again and then I will revert your edits. ] 19:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed you did some moves to this effect, so I'm inviting you to see ]. TIA. --] (]) 02:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Pannonia== | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| Why you removed "Pannonia, Frankish province" from the list: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Pannonia_%28disambiguation%29&diff=122101399&oldid=122051064 Also, if "1444 Pannonia asteroid" is listed into "In astronomy" section, then I do not see why for example "Lower Pannonia" cannot be listed in "In history" section. Both of them are not "just Pannonia", but "Pannonia + something". ] ] 17:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello Juro! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Ján Čarnogurský}}</small> | |||
| It holds for the names of all asteroids: the asteroid is normally called "proper name X" only, but you can also add the number at the beginning. Iow, Pannonia is another name for 1444 Pannonia (by definition, there is no 1443 Pannonia, for example). On the other hand, Lower Pannonia does not have the alternative name Pannonia only, because Lower Pannonia is only a part of Pannonia. Therefore including it in the main list under the title "Pannonia" is highly misleading, because an uniformed reader could think that you can also call Lower Pannonia just Pannonia. And you can remove the "in astronomy" heading, of cource, if you like. ] 21:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Michal Kováč}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 22:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| Ah, and as for the Frankish "province", originally I wanted to write something about it in the main Pannonia article, because I think that is the best place for it if you mean the post-Migration of Peoples period, but then it turned out that I have no time for that. So you can readd it, but | |||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->] ] 21:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I do not think that anybody will write something about that ever...and I would not call it "province" for that time period. ] 21:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Possibly unfree File:Drinkers Are Warned Again By Coach Yost.jpg == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw-puf --> ] (]) 00:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :How would you call it if not "province"? ] ] 22:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| See ] --] (]) 20:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I do not know, the situation was very chaotic there around the 5th - 7th century, and as I have said above, I have decided not to invest my time into that; they have also created a new subdivision: Pannonia+ something (I do not remember the name) etc. ] 23:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page appears to be an unambiguous ]. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-3685.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. | |||
| If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at ]. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see ] for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at ] for more details, or ask a question ]. | |||
| :::I believe that "new subdivision" was in fact ] that was vassal to the Frankish empire in one time period, and if that is so, then we already included it. ] ] 23:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 21:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No, it was created by Theoderich and went like Pannonia V.i..a. ] 23:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok, whatever, but if this separate Frankish province existed as such, then I still believe that it should be included as separate entry into disambiguation page, but I can live with the current version of the page as well. ] ] 21:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Pannonian plain/basin== | |||
| Check those articles now: ], ]. Are they ok now? ] ] 13:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, I was bussy with other things - I will create this disambiguation page, just wait a little until I correct all those articles. ] ] 15:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Is it ok now?: | |||
| * http://en.wikipedia.org/Pannonian_Basin | |||
| * http://en.wikipedia.org/Great_Hungarian_Plain | |||
| * http://en.wikipedia.org/Pannonian_Plain | |||
| ] ] 15:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Yes. ] 16:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == "banned users not allowed" == | |||
| Hi! | |||
| I haven't been banned ever, I don't see in the block log, nor in the "what links here" (my IP userpage) any sign of that this IP was banned before... I see only, that it was used before me on nov 20th, but no other sign. since this is a dinamic IP, I believe, if you say, it has been used by a banned User before me, but as I repeat, I haven't run into autoblock, or found any sign of your claims right now. I would be happy, if you would not delete any of my comments and contributions. These are not vandalisms. Thank you. --] 21:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hey, I see, you have a strong accusatory style . {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|With regards to your comments on ]: }}Please see Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to ] for disruption. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:No personal attacks (npa2) -->. | |||
| As for your very disputable contribution, wich links are in fact leading to different words, than those marked, I believe, a bit more is needed, than a Russian dictionary, to prove, or dispute that. --] 22:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:05, 15 December 2023
Image source problem with Image:BA16thcentury.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BA16thcentury.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 14:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
Speedy deletion nomination of Liberty Global
Thank you.You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
A tag has been placed on Liberty Global, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Liberty Global and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ 15:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Slovak "motorroads"
I noticed you did some moves to this effect, so I'm inviting you to see Talk:Highways in Slovakia. TIA. --Joy (talk) 02:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Juro! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 9 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Ján Čarnogurský - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Michal Kováč - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Galánta (Galanta) District
Template:Galánta (Galanta) District has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Plastikspork ―Œ 21:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Drinkers Are Warned Again By Coach Yost.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Drinkers Are Warned Again By Coach Yost.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Map of Bratislava castle.jpg
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Map of Bratislava castle.jpg --Jarekt (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Slovaks in Czechoslovakia (1948–89)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Slovaks in Czechoslovakia (1948–89) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-3685.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Themillofkeytone (talk) 21:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)