Misplaced Pages

Japanese nationalism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:36, 19 April 2005 edit200.46.215.104 (talk) Racial views← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:43, 11 December 2024 edit undoSalmoonlight (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,053 editsmNo edit summary 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Political ideology}}
'''Japanese nationalism''' is a generic title, referring to a complex series of ] and ] ideas held in ].
{{Multiple issues|
{{more footnotes needed|date=April 2012}}
{{More citations needed|date=January 2016}}}}
]]]
{{nationalism sidebar|types}}
'''Japanese nationalism'''{{efn|There are various notation for "Nationalism" in Japan:
* ] (Hepburn: ''nashonarizumu'', lit: ] notation for the English word "nationalism")
* ] (Hepburn: '']'', lit: "]")
* ] (Hepburn: ''kokka shugi'', lit: "state-based nationalism" or "]")
* ] (Hepburn: '']'', lit: "]" or "]")
* ] (Hepburn: ''kokumin shugi'', lit: "state-based nationalism" or "]")
* ] (Hepburn: '']'', lit: "Japan-ism" or "Japanese nationalism")
}} is a form of ] that asserts the belief that the ] are a monolithic ] with a single immutable culture. Over the last two centuries, it has encompassed a broad range of ideas and sentiments. It is useful to distinguish Japanese ] from political or ], since many forms of cultural nationalism, such as those which are associated with ], have been hostile to state-fostered nationalism.


In ] Japan, nationalist ideology consisted of a blend of native and imported political philosophies, initially developed by the ] to promote national unity and patriotism, first in defense against colonization by Western powers, and later in a struggle to attain equality with the ].
From a political point of view and in the years leading up to ], the particular political and ideological foundations for the actions of the Japanese military (] and ] forces, not always acting in concert) can be called a '''Japanese nationalist ideology'''. This ideology, too complicated for a compressed explanation, involved radical right doctrines, with certain similarities to ] or ]. It was though a unique and singular combination of philosophical, nationalistic, cultural and religious elements.


It evolved throughout the ] and ]s, and was used to justify increasingly extreme ideology, such as ], ], and ]. It has also provided a political and ideological foundation for the actions and atrocities of the Japanese military in the years leading up to and throughout ].
[[Image:IJNflag.png|thumb|240px|'''Kyokujitsu-ki''',(the sun with rays flag)
or "Japanese war banner".Ensign of the '''Imperial Japanese Navy'''. Also,one of best-know Japanese nationalist signs,since the First ] (1894-95) and ] times (1941-45).This flag was sometimes also used by the Imperial Japanese Army on land, and is now employed by Japanese right-nationalist groups as well as the ].]]


Japanese nationalism has been used as justification for revising ] from ], which denies ], including ']' and the ].<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Tanabe |first=Shunsuke |date=March 2021 |title=Sociological studies on nationalism in Japan |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02685809211005347 |journal=International Sociology |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=171–182 |doi=10.1177/02685809211005347 |s2cid=234834919 |issn=0268-5809}}</ref>
] (Emperor Hirohito) was considered the symbol of Japanese nationalist ideology, the center of State Shintoism,Chief of Imperial Government and object of National Emperor-worship cult.]]


==Meiji era beginnings (1868–1912)==
==The ideology of Japanese nationalism 1905-1945==
During the final days of the ], the perceived threat of foreign encroachment, especially after the arrival of Commodore ] and the signing of the ], led to increased prominence to the development of nationalist ideologies. Some prominent '']'' promoted the concept of ''fukko'' (a return to the past), while others promoted ''ōsei'' (the Emperor's supreme authority). The terms were not mutually exclusive, merging into the '']'' (revere the emperor, expel the barbarians) concept, which in turn was a major driving force in starting the ].


The ] of 1889 defined allegiance to the State as the citizen's highest duty. The constitution itself contained a mix of political Western practices and traditional Japanese political ideas.
===Tradition===


===Basis of economic growth===
====''Bushido''====
The extreme disparity in economic and military power between Japan and the Western colonial powers was a great cause for concern for the early ]. The motto '']'' (enrich the country and strengthen the military) symbolized Meiji period nationalistic policies to provide government support to strengthen strategic industries. Only with a strong economic base could Japan afford to build a strong, modern military along Western lines, and only with a strong economy and military could Japan force a ], such as the Kanagawa Accords. Government policies also laid the basis of later industrialist empires known as the '']''.{{Citation needed|reason=needs citation and neutral editing|date=June 2014}}


===Bushidō===
The '']'' (warrior way) &mdash; the ] code &mdash; had come from the ] code, of ]n origin. When the ] system was abolished the code was adopted for ideological purposes and ] doctrine.other example are the use
As a residue of its widespread use in propaganda during the 19th century, military nationalism in Japan was often known as '']'' (武士道 "the way of the warrior"). The word, denoting a coherent code of beliefs and doctrines about the proper path of the ], or what is called generically 'warrior thought' (武家思想, ''buke shisō''), is rarely encountered in Japanese texts before the Meiji era, when the 11 volumes of the '']'' of ], compiled in the years from 1710 to 1716 where the character combination is employed, was finally published.
standart of ] Japanese ] sword joining at ] Pistol how command sign of officers and commanders in Imperial Japanese Forces of Army and Navy Branches,during ].


Constituted over a long time by house manuals on war and warriors, it gained some official backing with the establishment of the ], which sought an ideological orthodoxy in the ] of ] tailored for military echelons that formed the basis of the new shogunal government.<ref>Grant K. Goodman, ''Japan and the Dutch 1600-1853'', Curzon Press, 2000, pp.1-8</ref> An important early role was played by ] in theorizing a Japanese military ethos. After the abolition of the feudal system, the new military institutions of Japan were shaped along European lines, with Western instructors, and the codes themselves modeled on standard models adapted from abroad. The impeccable behavior, in terms of international criteria, displayed by the Japanese military in the ] was proof that Japan finally had a modern army whose techniques, drilling, and etiquette of the war differed little from that of what prevailed among the Western imperial powers.<ref>Kozo Yamamura, "Success ill-gotten? The role of Meiji militarism in Japan's technological progress." ''Journal of Economic History'' 37.1 (1977): 113-135.</ref>
==== The role of '']''====
''See main article ]''


The '']'' (1890), presented Japan as a "sacred nation protected by the gods". An undercurrent of traditional warrior values never wholly disappeared, and as Japan slid towards a cycle of repeated crises from the mid-Taishō to early Shōwa eras, the old samurai ideals began to assume importance among more politicized officers in the ]. ] played an important role in adopting a doctrine of '']'' (spiritual training) as an ideological backbone for army personnel. As ], he supported the integration of the samurai code into the national education system.
In developing the modern concept of ] and '''Emperor worship''', various Japanese thinkers tried to protect national beliefs from foreign elements such as Chinese religious thinking. They returned to ancient Japanese customs, creating the "Restoration Shintoist Movement" following ] of the ]. In researching the origins of Japanese culture, Mootori studied the Classic Shinto Chronicles, the '']''. These teach the superiority of the Sun Goddess ]. In this philosophy, Divine participation in natural events is rare and Divine Providence can't be predicted. Out of respect for the divine, subjects are expected to submit to Divine Providence.


===Role of ''Shinto''===
One of Mootori's followers, ], expanded Norinaga's idea of purifying fundamental Shintoism from Chinese influences. Hirata proposed a mixed ] theology, comparing the ], a central God mentioned in the Kojiki Chronicle, with the Christian ]. His view was that the first god presiding over the universe had two helpers: High Productive (]) and Divine Productive (]), representing the ] principle of Asian thought. Combined with sacred texts of Kojiki, ] and ], this blend produced a ] for the time.
{{Main|State Shinto}}
In developing the modern concepts of {{nihongo|]ism|国家神道|kokka shintō}} and ], various Japanese philosophers tried to revive or purify national beliefs ('']'') by removing imported foreign ideas, borrowed primarily from ]. This "Restoration Shintōist Movement" began with ] in the 18th century. Motoori Norinaga, and later ], based their research on the '']'' and other classic Shintō texts which teach the superiority of the Sun Goddess '']''. This formed the basis for State Shinto, as the ] claimed direct descent from ''Amaterasu''. The emperor himself was therefore sacred, and all proclamations of the emperor had thus a religious significance.


After the Meiji Restoration, the new imperial government needed to rapidly modernize the polity and ], and the Meiji oligarchy felt that those goals could only be accomplished through a strong sense of national unity and cultural identity, with State Shinto as an essential counterweight to the imported ] of the past, the ] and other Western philosophies of the present.{{Citation needed|reason=needs citation and neutral editing|date=June 2014}}
This is the religious ideology which formed the basis for emperor worship and the Shinto State religion: the Divine Emperor was descended directly from Amaterasu Omikami, the National God who protects the country. All proclamations of the emperor took on religious significance; for instance, in 1882, the ] made an "Imperial Rescript to Seamen and Soldiers", from this time considered sacred and obligatory.


In 1890, the ] was issued, and students were required to ritually recite its oath to "offer yourselves courageously to the State" as well as protect the Imperial family. The practice of emperor worship was further spread by distributing imperial portraits for esoteric veneration. All of these practices used to fortify national solidarity through patriotic centralized observance at shrines are said to have given pre-war Japanese nationalism a tint of ] and cultural introversion.<ref>Hall, Japan From Prehistory to Modern Times, page 328</ref>
In 1890 the educational system was adapted, taking State Shintoism as principal religion. The pre-existing other 13 Shinto sects (]) were driven out. "The Emperor is a Revealed God among men, a Manifest Deity for us." The Imperial Rescript to Seamen and Soldiers was added to the National education system, to present the historical relation of Imperial mythical ancestors with their subjects. When these texts were read, subjects demonstrated their respect for the Emperor by saying "In Name of your Majesty and your seal."


State Shinto placed emphasis on the idea that the "center of Phenomenal World is '']''." From that center, the doctrine dictated that subjects should spread the idea of the great spirit around the world. Thus began ideas of Japanese territorial expansion. The {{nihongo|'']''|八紘一宇}} philosophy became popular during the Second Sino-Japanese War. This came to be regarded by ] as a doctrine that the emperor was the center of the phenomenal world, lending religious impetus to ideas of Japanese territorial expansion.

====Hachiman====

] was Japan's traditional deity of war. The military also used this cult. The families of soldiers sent to the front prayed at his shrines for the national war effort's success, and the prompt return of sons.

====Kamikaze====
''See main article ]''

The extreme use of tradition was seen in the idea of Vice Admiral ] of ''Kamikaze'' special defensive units of the ] in 1944-45. Admiral ] at first opposed this, but had to acknowledge that they alone were able to inflict substantial damage on the ] navies.these special pilots before at takeoff carryng special symbols how ] Flags, writing ] preys,the ] Pistol and/or ] Samurai sword and ] with sun with rays sign headband for remember your special mission.


This drew on the mythical version of the repulse of the ] ], already a point of reference when bad weather caused damage to the ] in the ].

====The chrysanthemum====

]

The ] flower was much used as an imperial symbol. It alludes to the ], the traditional ] of Japanese emperors.


===Education=== ===Education===
{{Main|Education in the Empire of Japan}}
The principal educational emphasis from the Meiji period was on the great importance of traditional national political values, religion, and morality. The Imperial Rescript on Education of 1890 promoted a return to traditional ] in the hierarchal nature of human relations, with the State superior to the Individual, and the Emperor superior to the State. The Japanese state modernized organizationally but preserved its national idiosyncrasies. The attitude reinforced from 1905 was that Japan was to be a powerful nation, equal at least to the Western powers. During the Shōwa period, the educational system was used for supporting the militarized state and preparing future soldiers.


The government published official textbooks for all levels of students and reinforced that with cultural activities, seminars, etc. Emphasis on the texts such as the ''Kokutai-no-hongi'' in schools was intended to emphasize the "uniqueness of Japan" from ancient centuries. These cultural courses were supplemented with military and survival courses against foreign invasion.
The principal educational emphasis was on the great importance of traditional national political values, religion and morality. This prevailed from the ]. The Japanese state modernized organizationally, but preserved its national idiosyncracies. Japan was to be a powerful nation, equal at least to the Western powers, an attitude reinforced from 1905. During the ] the educational system was used for militarist radical ideologies, supporting the militarised state and preparing future soldiers.


Apart from indoctrination in nationalism and religion, children and school students received military drills (survival, ]). These were taken further by the ]; college students were trained, and some recruited, for home defense and regular military units. Young women received first aid training. All of these actions were said to be taken to ensure Japan's safety and protect against larger and more dangerous countries.
The government published official text books for all levels of student,
and reinforced that with cultural activites, seminars, etc. These cultural courses were supplemented with military and survival courses (against invasion).


==Nationalist politics==
In the exterior provinces and Manchukuo the education system was distinct, for those who were not Japanese subjects. The Koreans and Manchus for
===Origin of nationalist structures and parties===
example were educated as industrial workers, office workers or soldiers. Indoctrination with Japanese ideology and views of international relations was included. One Japanese top civil servant said "the Koreans and others Asian peoples should learn to obey, not to know". In Manchukuo all ancient universities and schools were closed, with the organization of new centers
{{Main|Empire of Japan}}
in which the "humanities" were eliminated (for their 'negative' consequences). A
In 1882, the Japanese Government organized the ] (Imperial Gubernative Party), one of the first nationalist parties in the country. Starting from the ], Japan adopted the moniker "]" ("Dai Nippon Teikoku"), acquiring a colonial empire, with the acquisition of ] (1869), ] (1879), ] (1895), the ] and ] (1905), ] (Korea) (1905–10) and the ] islands (1918–19).
foreign reporter of the London '']'' visited Manchukuo and cited the words of one civil servant "Manchuria needs more workers, not ]s with incomplete notions on how they abounded in Japan". Official Manchuokouan publications emphasied the 'utility' of the syllabus.


The wars against China and Russia were modern and demanded a nationalist expression of patriotic sentiment. From this period, the ] (founded in 1869) was converted into a focus for nationalist sentiment and received state patronage until the end of World War II. Yasukuni was dedicated to those Japanese and non-Japanese who had lost their lives serving Japan, and includes all war deaths from domestic and overseas conflicts from 1869 to 1945 (and none from any conflicts since 1945), but also civilians (women and students) and civil administration in colonies and occupied territories.
====Mobilisation of the young====


Between 1926 and 1928, the central government organized the "Peace Preservation Department" (an anti-subversive police section) and prosecuted all local Soviet-sponsored communists who proposed a socialist form of government. The Japanese Army organized the '']'' (military police service). Dissent was controlled by the usage of political and ], with the ] permitting police to restrict freedom of expression and freedom to assemble.
Apart from indoctrination in nationalism and religion, children and school students received military drills (on weapons, hand-to-hand combat, survival, ]). These were taken further by the Imperial Japanese Young Federation (comparable to the ]); college students were trained, and some recruited for home defense and regular military units. Young women received First Aid training. Children and young people worked in weapons factories.


From 1925 to 1935, the {{interlanguage link|Nippon Shimbun|ja|日本_(新聞)}} (日本新聞) promoted nationalist ideology and sought to influence the Japanese political landscape. In spite of a relatively small overall circulation, it had wide readership among right-wing politicians and advocated the concept of the divine right of the emperor by vigorously attacking ]'s “emperor organ theory”.<ref name=nhk>{{cite web | title=戦前最大の右派新聞約10年分見つかる|url=https://www.nhk.or.jp/politics/articles/lastweek/21287.html| publisher=]|date=2019-08-09}}</ref><ref name=nhk2>{{cite web | title=The Fall of Freedom - How a newspaper led Japan to war|url=https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/tv/documentary/20191013/4001341/| publisher=]|date=2019-10-12}}</ref>
===Nationalist politics===


====Origin of nationalist structures and parties==== ===Realities of political power===
] (the sun-with rays-flag) was the ] of the ]; it is now employed by the ] ships.]]
''See main article ]''
] of the battleship ]]]
Since the Meiji restoration, the central figure of the state was the ]. According to the constitution, the emperor was ] (article 4) and Supreme Commander of the Army and the Navy (article 11). ] was also, from 1937, the commander of the ]. Japanese citizens were rallied to the "Defensive State" or "Consensus State", in which all efforts of the nation supported collective objectives, by guidance from ], history, and dogma — thus obtaining a "national consensus". Democratic institutions were installed in 1890 with the promulgation of a constitution and continued to acquire legitimacy until the 1920s when they fell into disrepute.


Concerns that irresponsible political parties could have too great an influence over vital military affairs introduced a rule that the Army alone should nominate the Army Minister in civilian government. This permitted the army to have a '']'' ] over civilian governments by having the power to refuse to nominate a candidate. This policy was introduced in law in 1900 but abolished in 1913. It was reintroduced in 1936, cementing military influence over the government after that time.
In 1882 the Japanese Government organized the ] (Imperial Gubernative Party), one of first nationalist parties in the country. From the ] Japan was called "]", setting up a real Empire, with the inclusions of ] (1895), the ] and ] (1905), the ] islands (1918-19) and aiming at control of ] (Korea)(1905-10).


The political system of Japan became subverted by the military throughout the 1930s from repeated attempted coups, and independent militarist interventions. The invasion of Manchuria after elements in the army manufactured an incident to justify a takeover was accomplished without instruction from the Tokyo government. This showed the impotence of the civilian government to have any influence over the impulses of the army. Governments become increasingly passive, allowing agency and direction of the state to fall to disparate competing elements of the army. The role of the emperor remained highly prestigious, with various factions competing to advocate their interpretation of what the emperor "truly" wanted.
The wars against China and Russia were ]s, and required a nationalistic focus of patriotic sentiment. From this period the ] was converted into a center of the new patriotic sense. During the 1920s years the official establishment was conceptually organized in this form: Nobility and Aristocracy (]); Commercial and Industrialist (]); and great landowners and Military (]).


After the war, scrutiny of the emperor's role in the war and militarism intensified. For many historians such as ], Akira Yamada, Peter Wetzler, ] and ], the work done by ] and ] during the first months of the ] to exonerate Hirohito and all the imperial family from criminal prosecutions in the ] was the predominant factor in the campaign to diminish in retrospect the role played by the emperor during the war. They argue that the post-war view focused on the imperial conferences and missed the numerous "behind the chrysanthemum curtain" meetings where the real decisions were made between Hirohito, his chiefs of staff, and the cabinet. For Fujiwara, "the thesis that the Emperor, as an organ of responsibility, could not reverse cabinet decision, is a myth fabricated after the war."<ref>''Shōwa tennō no 15 nen sensō'' ''(The Shōwa emperor fifteen years war)'', Aoki Shoten, 1991, p.122</ref>
In 1926-28 the central government organized the "Peace preservation
Department" (an antisubversive police section), and prosecuted all local ]s who proposed a ] form of government. The Japanese Army organized the ] (Military police service)and the Japanese Navy an equivalent. These security groups not only had military police responsibilites, additionally they possessed special weapons (groups in Manchuria), and a political department, and were ideologically related to the ] Army Party,(other Political and Ideologycal branch of Japanese Army) and the colonial and security administrations.


===Political ideas===
====Realities of political power====
During the 1920s, right-wing nationalist beliefs became an increasingly dominant force. State support for Shinto encouraged a belief in the mythological history of Japan and thus led to mysticism and cultural chauvinism. Some secret societies took up ] and Japan-centered radical ideas. They included: '']'' (Black Ocean Society, 1881), '']'' (Amur River Society, or Black Dragon Society, 1901), movements dedicated to overseas Japanese expansion to the north; '']'' (Japanese Patriotic Society, 1919), founded by ]; '']'' (Anti-Red League) founded at the same time as the ]; and the '']'' (State Basis Society) founded in 1924 by Baron ], for the preservation of the unique national character of Japan and its special mission in Asia.


Some of the nationalist ideas can be attributed to the ideologue ] (1885–1937), an Amur River Society member. In his 1919 book ''An Outline Plan for the Reorganization of Japan'', Kita proposed a military ''coup d'état'' to promote the supposed true aims of the ]. This book was banned, but certain military circles read in it in the early 1930s. Kita's plan was phrased in terms of freeing the Emperor from weak or treasonous counselors. After suspending the constitution, and dissolving the ], the Emperor and his military defenders should work for a "collectivist direct voluntarism" to unify people and leaders. Harmony with the ]es would be sought by the abolition of the aristocracy and austerity for the Imperial House. Overseas, Japan would ] Asia of Western influence. The Amur River Society was later instrumental in the Manchurian incident. {{Citation needed|date=October 2015}}
To call Japan in 1941 ']' or ']' is an error, according to some authors. The "New Structure" in Japan did not depend on one leader at the centre, a ] or ]. Japanese citizens were rallied to the "Defensive State" or "Consensus State", in which all efforts of the nation supported collective objectives, by guidance from ], history and dogmas, obtaining a "national consensus".


===Political nationalist movements===
In this state the central figure was the '']'', the emperor, as had been the case from the Meiji constitution onwards, co-existing with the interests of the official establishment.
The Japanese Navy was in general terms more traditionalist, in defending ancient values and the sacred nature of the Emperor; the Japanese Army was more forward-looking, in the sense of valuing primarily strong leadership, as is evidenced by the use of the ''coup'' and direct action. The Navy typically preferred political methods. The Army, ultimately, was the vehicle for the hyper-nationalists, anti-communists, anticapitalists, antiparliamentarians, and Nationalist-Militarist ideals.


The military was considered politically "clean" in terms of ], additionally assuming responsibility for 'restoring' the security of the nation. The armed forces took up criticism of the traditional democratic parties and regular government for many reasons (low funds for the armed forces, compromised national security, weakness of the leaders). They were also, by their composition, closely aware of the effects of economic depression on the middle and lower classes, and the ] threat.
About who really held the political power in Japan, there are two versions. One says that real control was exerted by the Emperor over the military; the other validates the "trinity" mentioned above.


Both branches gained power as they administered the exterior provinces and military preparations.
There is also the 'realist' position, denying politics as a factor: real control did lie with the military, behind a front formed by the Emperor and Government (as certainly occurred in ] with the ] ]).


===Nationalist right in the 1920s===
The principal military figures were:
Other nationalist rightist groups in the 1920s were the ''Jinmu Kai'' (] Society), ''Tenketo Kai'' (Heaven Spade Party), ''Ketsumeidan'' (Blood Fraternity) and '']'' (Cherry Blossom Society). This last was founded by Dr. ], professor of the Colonization Academy, and radical defender of expansionism and military armed revolution at home. Amongst members were Army officers implicated in the ], such as ], and ]{{dubious|date=January 2021}}. Okawa served as a conduit by which ]'s ideas reached young nationalist officers on the right.


] (right) and ], October 1943]]
*General ],prime minister,war minster,interior affair Minister,
Violent ''coups'' took place, and the ] made, in effect unilaterally, the decision to invade Manchuria. This was then treated as a ''fait accompli'' by Government and Emperor. {{Citation needed|date=October 2015}}
*General ], state chief of Army,
*General ] Home defense commander and chief of military instructions,
*Admiral ] state chief of Navy,
*Admiral ] Marine Minister,
*General ], son of Marshal ], in charge of the Army forces during the early Pacific war in South Asia
*Admiral ], who directed the Navy forces during ] and early Pacific war.
*General ], the official contact with Germany, and a firm supporter of the ].


===Doctrines===
The names of ], ] (]), ], ], ], ] and ], amongst others, were prominent as industrialists.
The ] (the "Asian ]") stated that Japan assumed the total responsibility for peace in Asia. Minister ] proclaimed "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" and that Northern China was a "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence, in announcing a "holy war" against the Soviet Union and China as the "national mission".


During 1940 ] proclaimed the ''Shintaisei'' (New National Structure), making Japan into an "advanced state of National Defense", and the creation of the '']'' (Imperial Authority Assistance Association), for organizing a centralized "consensus state". Associated are the government creation of the '']'' (residents' committees). Other ideological creations of the time were the book "]" (臣民の道), the "Imperial Way" or "War Party" ('']'') Army party, the "Yamato spirit" ('']''), and the idea of '']'' (which directly translates to "8 corners under one roof", that means, "one house in which every people can live" or "everyone is family"), "Religion and Government Unity" (''Saisei itchi''), and ''Kokka Sodoin Ho'' (General Mobilization Right).
====Political ideas====


The official academic texts included '']'' and '']''. Both presented a view of Japan's history and the Japanese ideal to unite East and West.
The novel political elements were "exalted militarism" and "State Socialism". Compounded they made a distinctive ''Militarism-Socialism'' rigth ideology.


===Geostrategy===
During the 1920s Right-Nationalist beliefs became a major force. The state support for Shinto encouraged a semi-religious belief in the mythological history of Japan (and thus to mysticism and cultural introversion). Some nationalist secret societies took up ultranationalism, Japan-centred radical ideas, and a new conception of State Socialism. They included: Genyosha (Black Ocean Society, 1881), Kokuryukai (Amur Society, or Black Dragon Society,1901), movements dedicated to overseas Japanese expansion to the north; Japanese Patriotic Society (Nihon Kokusui Kai, 1919), founded by ]; Anti-Red League (Sekka Boshidan) founded at the same time as the ]; and the State Basis Society (Kokuhonsha) founded in 1924 by ], for the preservation of the unique national character of ] and its special mission in ].
{{Main|Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere}}
] at its greatest extent]]
The economic doctrines of the "]" were in 1941 transformed to the "Great Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" Plan, as a basis for the Japanese national finances, and conquest plans. There was a history of perhaps two decades behind these moves.


The ], such as ], concerned with Mainland Asia, knew the ] theory of ], expressed in the book ''Democratic Ideas and Reality''. He discussed why the 'World Island' of Eurasia and Africa was dominant, and why the key to this was the 'Central Land' in ]. This is protected from sea attack, by deserts and mountains, and is vulnerable only on its west side, and to advanced technology from Europe.
The introduction of the distinctive theory of "]" is attributed to ] (1885-1937), an Amur Society member and Asian mainland expert, in his 1919 book "General Plan for National
Reorganization of Japan" (''Nihon kaizo hohan taiko''). He proposed a military ''coup d'état'' to promote the supposed true aims of the ]. This book was banned, but certain military circles read in it in the early 1930s.


Mackinder declared that: "Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the heartland commands the World-Island; Who rules the World-Island commands the World". These central Asiatic lands included: all of the Soviet Union, except the Pacific coast, west of the ]; all ], ], ] and ]. This zone is vast and possesses natural resources and raw materials, does not possess major farming possibilities, and has a very little population. Mackinder thought in terms of land and sea power: the latter can outflank the former, and carry out distant ] operations, but needs adequate bases.
Kita's plan was phrased in terms of freeing the Emperor from weak and treasonous counsellors. After suspending the Constitution, and dissolving the ], the Emperor and his military defenders should work for a "collectivist
direct voluntarism" to unify people and leaders. Harmony with the ]es would be sought by the abolition of the aristocracy and austerity for the Imperial House. Overseas Japan would free Asia of Western influence.


These geopolitical ideas coincided with the theories of Lieutenant Colonel ], sent in 1928 to Manchuria to spy. The Army was on the ] side. The Navy, on the other hand, was interested in the ] of expansion. An extended debate ensued, resolved in the end by the stern experience of Japan's armed conflicts with the Soviet Union in 1938–39. This tipped the balance towards the 'South' plan and the ] that precipitated the ] in 1941.
====Political nationalist movements====

The Japanese Navy was in general terms more traditionalist, in
defending ancient values and the sacrality of the Emperor; the Japanese Army was more forward-looking, in the sense of valuing primarily strong leadership, as is evidenced by the use of the ''coup'' and direct action. The Navy typically preferred political methods. The Army, ultimately, was the vehicle for the anticapitalists, hypernationalists, anticommunists, antiparliamentarians, Extreme Right-Socialists and Nationalist-Militarists ideals.

The military were considered politically "clean" in terms of ], and assumed responsibility for 'restoring' the security of of the nation, too. The armed forces took up criticism of the traditional democratic parties and regular government for many reasons (low funds for the armed forces, compromised national security, weakness of the leaders). They were also, by their composition, closely aware of the effects of economic depression on the middle and lower classes, and the ] threat.

Both branches gained in power as they administered the exterior provinces and military preparations.

====The nationalist right in the 1920s====

Other nationalist-rightist groups in the 1920s were the Jinmmu Society
(Jinmmu Kai), Heaven Spade Party (Tenketo Kai), Blood Fraternity
(Ketsumeidan), and Cherry Society (Sakurai Kai). This last was founded by Dr. ], professor of of the Colonization Academy, and
radical defender of expansionism and military armed revolution at homme. Amongst members were Army officers implicated in the Manchuria Affair, such as
], and ]. Okawa served as a conduit by which ]'s ideas reached young nationalist officers.

Violent ''coups'' took place, and the ] made, in effect unilaterally, the decision to invade Manchuria. This was then treated as a ''fait accompli'' by Government and Emperor.

====Doctrines====

The Amau Doctrine (the Asian ]) stated that Japan assumed the total responsibility for peace in Asia. Minister ] proclaimed the "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" and that Northern China was a the "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence, in announcing a "holy war" against the Soviet Union and China as the "national mission".

During 1940 ] proclaimed the New National Structure (Shintaisen), making Japan into an "advanced state of National Defense", and the creation of Imperial Authority Assistance Association (Tasei Yokusankai), for organizing a centralized "consensus state". Associated are the government creation of the "Tonarigum" (residents' committees). Other ideological creations of the time were the book "The Subject's Way", the "Imperial Way" or "War Party"(KoDo)Army party, the "Yamato Spirit"( Yamato damaishii), and the idea of "eight squares of the World" (Hakko Ishiu) and "Religion and Government Unity" (Saisei-itchi).

The official academic text was "Japan's Fundamentals of National Policy" (Kokutai no Hongi), presenting a view of Japan's history, and its mission to unite the East and West. The "moral national Bible" ''The Subject's Way'' presented an effective ] on nation, religion, cultural, social and ideological topics. All citizens needed to have it.

===Geopolitics===
''See main articles ], ]''

The economic doctrines of the "]" were in 1941 transformed to the "Great Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" Plan, as a basis for the Japanese national finances, and conquests plans. There was a history of perhaps two decades behind these moves.

The Japanese theorists concerned with Mainland Asia knew the geopolitical theory
of ], expressed in the book ''Democratic Ideas and Reality''. He discussed why the 'World Island' of Eurasia and Africa was dominant, and why the key to this was the 'Central Land' in ]. This is protected from sea attack, by deserts and mountains, and is vulnerable only on its west side, and to advanced technology from Europe.

Mackinder declared that: "Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the heartland commands the World Island; Who rules the World Island commands the World". These central Asiatic lands included: all of the ], except the ] coast, west of the ]; all ], ], ] and ]. This zone is vast and possesses natural resources and raw materials, does not possess major farming possiblities, and has very little population. Mackinder thought in terms of land and sea power: the latter can outflank the former, and carry out distant ] operations, but needs adequate bases.

These geopolitical ideas coincided with the theories of Lieutenant
Colonel ], sent in 1928 to Manchuria to spy. The Army adopted them, in some form.the Army theorists place stay in ] area.

The Navy, on the other hand, was interested in the southerly direction of expansion (see ])the ideological center of Navy theorists stay in ]. These differing ideas were partly rooted in the supposed ancestral origins of the Japanese Army and Navy: ] or ] for the former, ] and ] for the latter. The ] ], while not lining up with either, leant to the Yamato clan, and economic interests. An extended debate ensued, resolved in the end by the stern experience of Japan's armed conflicts with the ] in 1938-9. This tipped the balance towards the 'South' plan, and the ] that precipitated the ] in 1941.

===Racial views===

Japanese ideologists analyzed the '''Racial Question''', but from another perspective. According to their line on race, the Japanese people are the "''Superior Race''", who should direct the Great East Asian destiny. They were guided by Gods and had the sacred mission of teaching customs and lifestyle to other Asians. They should expand their lands in the ], and
also rule over inferior White Western persons.

Under the influence of these ideas occurred certain lamentable ]s. The best known example, in which racial theories have been said to be implicated, is the 1937 ] known as "]".similar if reported in same times for Swiss journalist and others foreings in ] about the ''natural rigth'' why poses japanese subjects of inflict bad treates over all any ''inferior race'' subjects in country.


===Other ideological lines=== ===Other ideological lines===
The ] was another "think tank" for future leaders of a radical totalitarian Japan, led by Count ]. He was a supporter of radical political experiments. With ] and ], they created a revolutionary radical-right policy.


These revolutionary groups later had the help of several important personages, making reality to some certain ideas of the nationalist-militarist policy with practical work in ]. They included General ], chief of ] and leader of ]; ], who served as president of the (] Company) and Foreign Affairs Minister; and ], an army ideologist who organized the government and political structure of Manchukuo. Tojo later became War Minister and Prime Minister in the Konoe cabinet, Matsuoka Foreign Minister, and Hoshino chief of Project departments charged with establishing a new economic structure for Japan. Some industrialists representative of this ideological strand were ], President of ], setting the structure for the Industry and Commerce ministry, and ], representing the ] Group becoming Communication Minister.
] was the head of the "Showa Studies Society", another "school" and "think tank" for teaching future leaders of a radical totalitarian Japan. Count ] was another "professor" there. He was a supporter of radical political experiments and armed revolution, and contact with farmers' associations led by the Imperial Farmers Association. He read ] and ], and other radical philosophers. With ] and ], they created a revolutionary radical-right policy.


Other groups created were the Government ]. Involved in both was Colonel ], who proposed a Nationalist ] dictatorship, combined with a state-run economy. The militarists had strong support from the wealthy owners of major industries.
These revolutionary groups later had the help of three
important personages, in making reality some certain ideas of a lost cause: they have in common practical work on the ] Socialist-Militarist policy. They were: General ], chief of secret police in this country and leader of ] and other Northern regions; ], who served as president of ] (] Company) and Foreign affairs minister; and ], an army ideologist who organized the government and political structure of Manchukuo. Tojo later became War Minister and Prime minster in the ], Matsuoka Foreign Minister, and Hoshino chief of Project departments charged with establishing a new economic structure for Japan. Some industrialists representive of this ideological strand were ], President of ], setting the structure for the Industry and Commerce ministry, and ], representing the ] Group becoming Communication Minister.


The "New Asia Day" celebration was to remember the sacred mission of extending influence to nearby Asian nations.
Other groups created were the Government Imperial Aid Association and Imperial Youth Federation. Involed in both was Colonel ], who proposed a Nationalist ] dictatorship, based on ]. The militarists had strong industrial support, but also socialist-nationalist sentiments on the part of radical officers, aware of poor farmers and workers who wanted social justicie.


The Japanese government, possibly following the German example of a "Worker's Front" State Syndicate, ultimately organized the ] to group all the ]s in the country. All syndicates of the "Japanese Workers Federation" were integrated into this controlling body.{{Citation needed|date=October 2015}}
The ] traditions were managed by: Leutenant General ], who directed the Government Imperial Aid Association; ], official member of ], who proposed a law that Shinto should be reaffirmed as ], as in past times; General ], an arch-nationalist, who restored the ancient sacred rites in the ], the "Preliminary Misogi Rite"; and ], another nationalist and religious supporter of official Shinto. ] organized the "Shintoist Rites Research Council" to research all ancient Shinto rites and practices. The "New Asia Day" celebration was to remember the sacred mission of extending influence to nearby Asian nations.


===Control of communications media=== ===Control of communications media===
{{Main|Censorship in the Empire of Japan}}
The press and other communication media were managed under the ]. ] was charged with disseminating all official information around the world. The radio was transmitted in English, Dutch, three Chinese dialects, Malay, Thai, as well Japanese to Southeast Asia; and the Islamic world had programs broadcast in Hindi, Burmese, Arabic, English, and French. In ], there were radio programs in English and Japanese. Other daily transmissions were to Europe, South and Central America, eastern areas of South America, and the US, with Australia and New Zealand receiving broadcasts too.


The official press agency ] was connected with the ]' press agencies such as ], ], the Italian agency ] and others. Local and Manchukoan newspapers such as ''Manchurian Daily News'' (Japanese-owned) were under the control of these institutions and only published officially approved notices and information.{{Citation needed|date=October 2015}}
The Press and other communication media were managed for the Information Department by Dr. ] and official spokesman ]. These
institution were modeled on the German Propaganda Minister. ] was charged with disseminating all official informations around the world. The radio transmitted in English, Dutch, three Chinese dialects, French, Malayan, Thai, as well Japanese to ]; and the Islamic world had programs broadcast in Hindustani, Burmese, Arabic, English and French. In ] there were radio programs in English and Japanese. Other daily transmissions were to Europe, South and Central America, eastern areas of South America and the USA, with Australia and New Zealand receiving broadcasts too.


==Nationalist symbology==
The official press agency ] was connected with the Axis powers' press agencies such as ], ] and others. Local and Manchukoan newspapers were under the control of these institutions and only published officially approved notices and information.
{{See also|National symbols of Japan}}
{{Unreferenced section|date=October 2018}}


===Shiragiku (the chrysanthemum) ===
===Economy===
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
''See main articles ], ]''
<gallery>
File:Imperial Seal of Japan.svg|]
File:Imperial Seal of Japan.jpg|] of the battleship ]
</gallery>
</div>


The ''shiragiku'' (lit. "white chrysanthemum") or more common ] flower was much used as an imperial symbol. It alludes to the ], the traditional ] of Japanese emperors.
In ] a ''centralized'' economic system was set up, with a National Central Bank, and the creation of the ], a Manchu local currency to replace the ] of ]. This remodelled the economy there after the Japanese pattern of the ], the national central bank. Similar moves occured in the ] and ] regime economies.


===Banzai===
The "]" was a wider, closed financial system that included Manchuria, much of China and Japan during the 1930s years, It was the forerunner of the "]" economic and commercial zone, that included all ] and more.
The traditional cheer was given to the Emperor and other dignitaries, or on special commemorations, was ''Tenno Heika Banzai'' (天皇陛下万歳 or 萬歲, 'long live the Emperor') or the shortened form, ].


The latter term, which means "ten thousand years," is an expression of Chinese origin (万歳) adopted by the Japanese in the ]. In its original sense, it is meant to represent an indeterminably lengthy time and is used to wish long life to a person, state, or project. As co-opted by the Japanese, it originally was simply used in this sense to wish long life to the Emperor (and by extension the Japanese state). As the ] progressed, it became the typical Japanese war cry or victory shout and was used to encourage Imperial troops in combat.
Japan had the the third-largest commercial fleet in the world, and in 1936 was the fifth nation in its foreign commerce, running at $1,183,000,000, or $28.19 (US dollars) ''per capita''.


===Everyday life=== ===Other nationalist symbols===
*]
*]
*] (signed war banner)
*Five-point star badge (] symbol)
*Cherry blossom badge (with or without anchor) (] symbol)
*] headband
*] ("One-thousand stitch belt")
*] (His Imperial Majesty's Reign)
*]
*]


==Post-war developments==
Daily life in Imperial Japan became hard. An American journalist noted that ordinary citizens resorted to the ] for some necessities. Surveillance and censorship was strict, and radio receivers to listen to foreign broadcasts were banned. Native Japanese culture was highly promoted, and ] became pervasive. ] rose. The novel ] by ] deals on various levels with the complexities and gradual closing of personal possibility of the times.other symbols of Japanese Empire in foreing are the ](Imperial Japanese Airways),](Manchukuo National Airways) and Merchant and Trasatlantic vessel line ].these all companies are managed for Japanese government.
{{Conservatism in Japan|Ideologies}}
{{See also|Potsdam Declaration|Surrender of Japan}}
{{Unreferenced section|date=October 2018}}
In February 1946, General ] was set the task of drafting a model constitution to serve as a guide for the Japanese people. The U.S. intention was to ensure that the sources of ] were rooted out through fundamental reforms of the Japanese government, society, and economic structure. Perhaps the most lasting effect that came out of this constitution is ] that reads:


: "Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes. To accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as another war potential, will never be maintained. The right to belligerency of the state will not be recognized."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html |title = The Constitution of Japan}}</ref>
===Ideological influences in foreign areas===


With the renunciation of war and military power, Japan looked to the United States for security. As the ] began, the United States fostered a closer relationship with Japan due to the latter's strategic location in respect to the USSR. Japan became, as stated by the Japanese Prime Minister ], an "]" for the United States.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/yasuhiro-nakasone-japanese-leader-who-revived-postwar-military-dies-11575000640|title=Yasuhiro Nakasone, Japanese Leader Who Revived Postwar Military, Dies|newspaper=Wall Street Journal|date=29 November 2019|last1=Davis|first1=River}}</ref> Ensuing from this close relationship with the United States, Japan hoped that in time their country would become the "third leg in a triangle involving two superpowers." While the mainstream Japanese politics maintained a pro-American attitude, scholars noted that the nationalist ']''<nowiki/>''' during post-war Japan was the United States.<ref name=":32">{{Citation |last=Woodward |first=Jude |title=The rise of Japanese nationalism |date=2017-08-30 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526121998.003.0006 |work=The US vs China |publisher=Manchester University Press |doi=10.7228/manchester/9781526121998.003.0006 |isbn=9781526121998 |access-date=2022-05-23}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Citation |title=The rise of the Chinese 'Other' in Japan's construction of identity: Is China a focal point of Japanese nationalism? |date=2015-10-05 |work=Identity Change and Foreign Policy |pages=107–128 |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9781315679662 |isbn=978-1-315-67966-2 |editor-last1=Hagstrom |editor-first1=Linus }}</ref> Left-wing nationalists criticized the United States's military presence whilst the conservative nationalists criticized the imposed military limitation by the United States.<ref name=":0" /> China later substituted the United States as the nationalist ''Other'' in contemporary Japanese politics '''.<ref name=":0" />''' In academia, some scholars argue that postwar Japanese intellects and politicians constructed the mono-ethnic identity through public discourses and education.<ref>{{Cite book |last=小熊 |first=英二 |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/49832735 |title=A genealogy of 'Japanese' self-images |date=2002 |publisher=Trans Pacific Press |isbn=1-876843-83-7 |oclc=49832735}}</ref> Japanese elites' tendency towards homogeneity and ethnic nationalism is from their desire to differentiate postwar Japanese identity from pre-war imperialist identity and multi-ethnic identity that include formerly colonized ethnic groups.
In Manchukuo the Japanese had their 'own' local nationalist parties.
The puppet ] (Emperor Puyi), having told the international
press he had decided to organized a local party of "] Doctrine", which was in fact run by the Japanese government. Later the "'''Northeast Administrative Commitee'''" group and "'''Concord Association Party'''" were the only political movements authorized.


Since the 1960s, economic growth in the Japanese miracle periods started to mitigate public distrust towards the central government.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Wilson |first=Sandra |date=2011-01-28 |title=Exhibiting a new Japan: the Tokyo Olympics of 1964 and Expo '70 in Osaka* |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2010.00568.x |journal=Historical Research |volume=85 |issue=227 |pages=159–178 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-2281.2010.00568.x |issn=0950-3471}}</ref> Japanese economic progress after World War II undermined the appeal of pre-war militarist nationalism, showing a path to prosperity was possible without colonies. The 1970s witnessed Japan's adoption of three fundamental tenets that would seek to define and direct Japanese internationalism, all concerning the need for Japanese initiatives in fostering a ]. Some criticism points out that politicians in the 1970s selectively remembered the past, preferring narratives of Japan as atomic weapon victim to consciously and unconsciously alienate Japan from its undesired aggressive past.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Droubie |first=Paul |date=November 2011 |title=Phoenix arisen: Japan as peaceful internationalist at the 1964 Tokyo Summer Olympics |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2011.626683 |journal=The International Journal of the History of Sport |volume=28 |issue=16 |pages=2309–2322 |doi=10.1080/09523367.2011.626683 |s2cid=159683017 |issn=0952-3367}}</ref> Some scholars note the apolitical nature of the 1964 Tokyo Olympics and the 1970 Osaka World Exposition, which allow politicians to forge Japan as peaceful and internationalist for a unified national identity.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" />
These parties were in the ''Militarist-Socialist'' mould, with uniforms and symbols modelled on the Japanese ''Militarist-Socialist Right'' doctrines. Tolerance of ] Chinese religious observance gave way to implantation of Shinto and Japanese customs. The treatment of farmers and workers was rigorously exploitative, and became harsh.


The rather implicit elite advocacy of conservative nationalism has become more salient since the 1990s, where regional competitions from ], and later China, created economic anxieties which reflected in political divisions.<ref name=":32"/> Many scholars have pointed out that the liberal internationalism has started to turn into conservative revisionist nationalism since the 1990s.<ref name=":32" /> The clashes of nationalism and the contemporary rise of ultra-nationalism, accompanied by military expansions and historical revisionism, are the hot topics of current academic discussions on post-war Japanese nationalism. The illiberal turn of nationalism started with new right-wing movements that created ] from ], which denies ], including ']' issues and ].<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Tanabe |first=Shunsuke |date=March 2021 |title=Sociological studies on nationalism in Japan |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02685809211005347 |journal=International Sociology |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=171–182 |doi=10.1177/02685809211005347 |s2cid=234834919 |issn=0268-5809}}</ref> Their emergences can be seen as a direct discontent towards pacifists' low posture to former colonized countries <ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ijiri |first=Hidenori |date=December 1990 |title=Sino-Japanese Controversy since the 1972 Diplomatic Normalization |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s030574100003143x |journal=The China Quarterly |volume=124 |pages=639–661 |doi=10.1017/s030574100003143x |s2cid=153597626 |issn=0305-7410}}</ref> but also motivated by economic anxiety in globalization.<ref name=":4" /> Although right-wing movements surfaced in the 1990s, the Japanese public still remain largely pacific.<ref>{{Cite book |editor1-last=Pilling |editor1-first=David |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1263746301 |title=Bending adversity : Japan and the art of survival |date=2 January 2020 |publisher=Penguin Books, Limited |isbn=978-0-14-199053-8 |oclc=1263746301}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Citation |title=Nationalism and history in contemporary Japan |date=2015-12-22 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315739601-24 |work=Asian Nationalisms Reconsidered |pages=188–201 |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9781315739601-24 |isbn=978-1-315-73960-1 |s2cid=217898344 |access-date=2022-05-23}}</ref>
Political administration was supposedly are managed by the "native" ] authorities, but Japanese advisers dominated, including ], ] (the "Lawrence of Manchuria"), ] (who served in China too), ](also head of the Manchu film industry), ],], ], ], ] (the "Malaysian Tiger"), and others. The "National Foundation" cultural entity and the "Central Shintoist Manchoukoan Temple" in ] were under the adminstration of ex-marshal and First Shinto Priest ]. Real power in Manchukuo lay with the "General Affairs State Council", and chief of the Manchoukouan industrial ] groups was ], an important industrialist with links to the Army. He guided the factory centers on the]-] industrial axis; ], ] and ] manufactured iron, coal, chemical and soy bean products, railway equipments, etc. Manchukuo was the ']' for Japan.


Since the 2000s, xenophobic online posts and nationalist claims against foreigners, mostly Chinese and Koreans, have risen due to anxieties over economic growth, regional competition, and globalization.<ref>{{Citation |last=Higuchi |first=Naoto |title=Japan's Postcolonial Hate Speech |date=2021-01-28 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108669559.017 |work=Hate Speech in Japan |pages=363–380 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |doi=10.1017/9781108669559.017 |isbn=9781108669559 |s2cid=234015678 |access-date=2022-05-23}}</ref><ref name=":4" /> Prime ministers ] and ]'s visits to the controversial ] has created huge controversies and received international backlashes.<ref>{{Citation |title=Political dynamics of contemporary Japanese nationalism |date=2015-12-22 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315739601-23 |work=Asian Nationalisms Reconsidered |pages=176–187 |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9781315739601-23 |isbn=978-1-315-73960-1 |access-date=2022-05-23}}</ref> Japanese top political leaders have started to adopt more explicit conservatism nationalist stances and expansionist military ambitions. ] tended to use ambiguous terms to describe his national agenda on controversial issues such as history education and intentionally avoided backlash from the public to equate him as an imperial leader. In order to justify military expansions, Abe framed his security agenda as proactive pacifism, enabling Japan to exercise collective self-defense.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Daisuke |last=Akimoto |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1130784112 |title=The Abe doctrine : Japan's proactive pacifism and security strategy |date=2018 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-981-13-5664-3 |oclc=1130784112}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Kingston |first=Jeff |title=One-Hand Clapping: Japanese Nationalism in the Abe Era |date=2018-08-21 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0256-5_7 |work=Japan and Asia’s Contested Order |series=Asia Today |pages=147–163 |place=Singapore |publisher=Springer Singapore |doi=10.1007/978-981-13-0256-5_7 |isbn=978-981-13-0255-8 |s2cid=158074981 |access-date=2022-05-23}}</ref> Japan's remilitarization is mostly due to security concerns of ] and ] in the East, as well as aligning with the US's aim to create alliances to contain China's global rise and deter North Korea's nuclear threat.<ref name=":32" /> Both the ] administration and the ] administration encouraged Japan's rearmament.<ref name=":32" /> Trump openly called for rapid Japanese rearmament, more due to discontent that the US support Japan while Japan does not have to do anything in return, less on prudence. Some scholars argue that the resurgence of ultra-nationalist tendency as solely an elite-driven process as the public remains pacifist, and overall public support is not required for politicians to achieve a nationalist agenda because of the low voter turnout.<ref name=":5" />
The ] Mongol ] had a "Central Academy" in ] under the direction of Colonel ]. A curious wartime rumour was that the Japanese Army had found the real tomb of ], in the] area; this was used for political ends.


== Ethnic nationalism ==
The goal was the "]" of "allied" nations, as already largely imposed in ] and ]. The intention in occupied China, in the pro-Japanese adiminstration of ], as elsewhere, was probably the same.
{{Main|Ethnic nationalism in Japan}}


==Ultranationalism==
===Summary===
{{Main|Ultranationalism (Japan)}}
{{See also|Statism in Shōwa Japan}}
Ultranationalism values the ]'s authority around the 'state' and advocates the militaristic agenda. There are differences of opinion among Japanese liberal scholars on whether or not Japan's ultranationalist movements can be viewed as "fascism".


===Uyoku dantai===
Under a complex mix of nationalist ideas, doctrines and pressures, the Japanese Imperial Forces found nationalist, ideological and political support for the fighting in mainland Asia and the Pacific conflict during ].
{{Main|Uyoku dantai}}
In 1996, the ] estimated that there were over 1,000 extremist right-wing groups in Japan, with about 100,000 members in total. These groups are known in Japanese as '']''. While there are political differences among the groups, they generally carry a philosophy of anti-leftism, hostility towards ], ], ] and occasionally the ], and justification of Japan's role in World War II. ''Uyoku dantai'' groups are well known for their highly visible ] and prominently marked with the name of the group and propaganda slogans. The vehicles play patriotic or wartime-era songs.


Activists affiliated with such groups have used ]s and time bombs to intimidate moderate politicians and public figures, including former Deputy Foreign Minister ] and ] Chairman ]. An ex-member of a right-wing group set fire to LDP politician ]'s house. Koichi Kato and Yotaro Kobayashi had spoken out against Koizumi's visits to ].<ref>{{ cite news| title = The Rise of Japan's Thought Police| url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/25/AR2006082501176.html |date=2006-08-27| first=Steven |last=Clemons | newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref>
The Imperial House represented the head of the nation and the last word in decision-making. Different points of view of Japan's national defense were aligned with the question of Asian continental expansion, or conquest of the Pacific area.
After the Japanese surrender in August ], the whole structure was dismantled by the ] occupation authorities in the whole Japanese Empire and Japanese-held territories.


Openly revisionist, ] is considered "the biggest right-wing organization in Japan".<ref name=Narusawa>Muneo Narusawa, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316200408/http://japanfocus.org/-Narusawa-Muneo/3879 |date=2015-03-16 }}, The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 11, Issue 1, No. 1, January 14, 2013,</ref><ref>The Economist of Britain on January 5, 2013. Cited in: William L. Brooks (2013), Will history again trip up Prime Minister Shinzo Abe? The Asahi Shimbun, May 7, 2013</ref>
==After 1945==


==Nationalist right-wing and far-right political parties==
In February of 1946 General ] was set the task of drafting a model constitution to serve as a guide for the ]ese people. The U.S. intention was to ensure that the sources of Japanese ] were rooted out through fundamental reforms of the Japanese government, society, and economic structure. Perhaps the most lasting effect that came out of this constitution is article 9 that reads:
* ] (1951–present)

* ] (1955–present)
:"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph,land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right to belligerency of the state will not be recognized."
* ] (1982–present)

* ] (1988–present)
With the renunciation of war and military power, Japan looked to the United States for security. As the ] began, the United States fostered a closer relationship with Japan due to the latter's strategic location in respect to the USSR. Japan became, as stated by the Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone, an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for the United States. Ensuing from this close relationship with the United States, Japan hoped that in time their country would become the "third leg in a triangle involving two superpowers." The seventies witnessed Japan's adoption of three fundamental tenets that would seek to define and direct Japanese internationalism, all concerning the need for Japanese initiatives in fostering a liberal internationalism.
* '']'' (1995–present)

* ] (2010–2012)
However, Japan's hopes of becoming a "third leg" between the US and USSR were never realized. Instead, Japan adopted a subservient role to the United States. Japan also failed to become an international leader. Attempts to negotiate the return of four islands historically seen as belonging to Japan from Russia and its failed attempt to create a bridge between Beijing and Washington, all contributed. As the Cold War reached its conclusion, Japan experienced a decay in relations with North Korea at the same time as American interest in Japan began to wane.
* ] (2012–2014)

* ] (2014–2018)
Coupled with this apparent political failure, Japan experienced an economic downturn through the 1990s. Once a growing political player, Japan was now looked on as an economic warning. The "Japanese disease" occurred due to a sharp rise in the value of the yen caused by the export competitiveness of certain manufacturing sectors. The collapse of the enormous speculative bubble in the Japanese stock and real estate markets at the beginning of the 1990's was compounded by additional bad policy making, stagnating the Japanese economy since 1992.
* ] (2016–present)

* ] (2017–2018, 2018–2021)
Through the loss of economic clout and the failure to realize international prominence, Japanese nationalism appears to be on the rise. Growing right wing parties, namely the revisionist party, seek to revise, if not completely rewrite, the constitution to exclude article 9. These parties believe that the exclusion of article 9 would allow Japan to develop a foreign policy independent of the United States. Other examples of the rise in nationalism can be found in the popularity of books such as ''The Japan That Can Say No, Analects of War,'' and the textbooks that downplay Japan's role in WW II. Also, perceived nationalism is present in the 1998 adoption of the national anthem and flag as state symbols, both of which were symbolic of Japanese nationalism during WW II, and Prime Minister Koizumi's three visits to the Yasukuni Shrine.
* ] (2020–present)

* ] (2023–present)
==The twenty-first century==

Japanese foreign policy is beginning to adopt a more nationalistic stance. PM Koizumi participated in a summit with North Korea in 2002. Prior to that, in 2001 Japanese boats attacked and sank a North Korean spy ship. Following, in 2003, Japan's defense minister suggested that Japan would be willing to contemplate a preemptive attack on North Korea if it saw evidence that a "devastating attack against Japan" was being prepared.


==Bibliography== ==Bibliography==
* Behr, Edward. ''The Last Emperor'' {{ISBN|0-553-34474-9}}, Bantam, 1987
* Newman, Joseph. ''Goodbye Japan'', published in New York, 1942
* Moore, Frederick. ''With Japan's Leaders'', published in New York, 1942
* Whitney Hall, John. ''Japanese Empire'', Vol.20, 1967.
* Emmott, Bill. "Japan's English Lessons" ''Foreign Policy'', 140 (2004)
* Kase, Yuri. "Japan's Nonnuclear Weapons Policy on the Changing Security Environment" ''World Affairs'', 165.3 (2003)
* Lincoln, Edward. "Japan: Using Power Narrowly" ''Washington Quarterly'', 27.1 (Winter 2003/2004)
* Ozawa, Terutomo. "The New Economic Nationalism and the Japanese Disease": The Conundrum of Managed Economic Growth" ''Journal of Economic Issues'', v30 (1996)
* Pyle, Kenneth B. ''The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in a New Era'', (Washington, D.C.)


==Other historical references==
==Basic reference==
===Asian and Pacific geopolitics===

* Shaw, B. Earl, article "United States Pacific Defense" in Van Valkenburg, Samuel Book ''America at War'' Prentice-Hall, (1942).
* Berh, Edward."The Last Emperor"(in spanish "El Ultimo Emperador"), translated and published for:
* Weigerth, W. Hans." Haushofer and the Pacific", ''Foreign Affairs'', XX (1942), P.732-742.
**ISBN 84-320-4410-5 (spanish),Editorial Planeta,Fourth Edition,1988.
* Mackinder, J. Halford, ''Democratic Ideals and Reality'', New York, Holt, (1942).
**ISBN 0-7788-3439-6 (english),Mcdonald/Futura Publishers Ed.
* Bowman, Isaiah. ''The New World'', Yonker-on-Hudson, World Book, (1928), 4th Ed.
* Newman,Joseph. "Goodbye Japan"(in spanish "Adios al Japon")translated and published for Editorial Poseidon,Buenos Aires Arg,1943.
* Whitney Hall,John."Japanese Empire",Vol.20(in spanish "Imperio Japones")translated and published for Ed Historia Universal XXI,1967.
* Emmott, Bill. &#8220;Japan&#8217;s English Lessons.&#8221; Foreign Policy, 140 (2004)
* Kase, Yuri.&#8220;Japan&#8217;s Nonnuclear Weapons Policy on the Changing Security Envirionment.&#8221; World Affairs, 165.3 (2003)
* Lincoln, Edward. &#8220;Japan: Using Power Narrowly.&#8221; Washington Quarterly, 27.1 (Winter 2003/2004)
* Ozawa, Terutomo. "The New Economic Nationalism and the Japanese Disease":
* The Conundrum of Managed Economic Growth.&#8221; Journal of Economic Issues, v30 (1996)
* Pyle, Kenneth B.The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in a New Era, (Washington D.C.)

==Others historical references==

===Asian and Pacific Geopolitics===

* Shaw, B. Earl, article "United States Pacific Defense" in Van Valkenburg, Samuel Book "America at War" Prentice-Hall,(1942).
* Weigerth, W. Hans."Haushofer and the Pacific",Foreing Affairs, XX (1942),P.732-742.
* Mackinder, J. Halford, "Democratic Ideals and Reality", New York, Holt,(1942).
* Bowman, Isaiah. "The New World", Yonker-on-Hudson, World Book, (1928), 4th Ed.

===Official Publications of the Japanese and Manchukuo Governments===


* Imperial Japanese Government Railways, Official guides to Eastern Asia, I, Manchuria and Chosen, Tokio, 1913 and later years. ===Official publications of the Japanese and Manchukuo governments===
* ], Official guides to Eastern Asia, I, Manchuria and Chosen, Tokio, 1913 and later years.
* South Manchurian Railway Company Ed,1929.- Progress in Manchuria (Report), 1907-28 * ] Company Ed, 1929. - Progress in Manchuria (Report), 1907–28
* Manchurian Year Books (various editions) * Manchurian Year Books (various editions)
* Far East Yearbooks (from 1941) * Far East Yearbooks (from 1941)
Line 265: Line 231:
* Review of Contemporary Manchuria, 1939. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government. * Review of Contemporary Manchuria, 1939. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government.
* Manchuria Annals, Vol.,1933-39. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government. * Manchuria Annals, Vol.,1933-39. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government.
* Hayashide,Kenjiro, Epochal journey to Nippon. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government. * Hayashide, Kenjiro, Epochal journey to Nippon. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government.
* Japan Yearbook,Tokio,(since 1941) * Japan Yearbook, Tokio, (since 1941)
* Tokio Nichi-Nichi, Osaka Mainichi (newspapers), English language supplements (from the 1930s) * Tokio Nichi-Nichi, Osaka Mainichi (newspapers), English language supplements (from the 1930s)
* The newspapers Nippon Dempo and Tenshin Nichi-Nichi Shimbun, Review Bungei Shunju * The newspapers Nippon Dempo and Tenshin Nichi-Nichi Shimbun, Review Bungei Shunju
* Voice of the People of Manchukuo. Manchoukuoan Government edition. * Voice of the People of Manchukuo. Manchoukuoan Government edition.
* Japan-Manchukuo Yearbook (1940s) * Japan-Manchukuo Yearbook (the 1940s)
* Governments-General of Taiwan, Chosen and Karafuto, Official Annual Reports on administration of these Provinces(1924-1926 and other years). * Governments-General of Taiwan, Chosen and Karafuto, Official Annual Reports on the administration of these Provinces (1924–1926 and other years).
* Mitsubishi Economics Research Bureau. "Japanese Trade and Industry,Present and Future", Mcmillan, London (1936) * Mitsubishi Economics Research Bureau. "Japanese Trade and Industry, Present and Future", Mcmillan, London (1936)
* Reviews and other publications of Kokusai Bunka Shinkokai (International Cultural Relations Society), Tokyo (1930s/40s). * Reviews and other publications of Kokusai Bunka Shinkokai (International Cultural Relations Society), Tokyo (the 1930s/40s).
* Publications of Kan-Ichi Uchida, Tokyo, Kobunsha Co. (same period) * Publications of Kan-Ichi Uchida, Tokyo, Kobunsha Co. (same period)


==Notes==
===Foreign general literature on the Empire of Japan and Japanese-supported regimes in Northeast Asia===
{{notelist}}

* ] and ], Journey to a war, ], 1939.
* Bergamini, David. Japanese imperialist Conspiracy, William Morrow 1971.
* Hibbert, Christopher, The Dragon Awakes.
* Fleming,Peter. One's Company; News from Tartary,Ed Jonathan Cape, 1936,New York,Ed.Scribner,1936.
* Johnston, Reginald. Twilight in the Forbidden City, Gollancz, 1934.
* Jones,F.C.,Manchuria after 1931, R.I.I.C.,1963.
* Koo,Wellington. Memoirs,"Oral History Series", from New York Times.
* McAlEAVY,David. A Dream of Tartary. George Allen & Unwin, 1963.
* Pearl,Ciryl.Morrison of Peking, Angus & Robertson,1967.
* Pu-Yi, From Emperor to Citizen, Foreign languages press, Peking, 1964.
* Rea, George Bronson. The Case of Manchukuo.
* Saga,Hiro. Wandering Princess.
* Leys,Simon. The Burning forest,Ed.Holt Rhinehart Winston,1986.
* Snow,Edgar. Battle for Asia.
* Taylor,George E.J apanese-sponsored regimes in Northem China.
* Vespa,Amleto. Secret Agent of Japan. Little Brown & Co.,1938.
* Woodhead,Henry. Adventures in Far Eastern Journalism.
* Embree, John F. "The Japanese",Smithsonian Institution War Background Studies, VII (1943).
* Schumpeter, E.B. "The industrialization of Japan and Manchukuo,1930-1940",New York,Ed Mcmillan(1940).
* Official Acts, from War Crime Far East International Tribunal,Tokio,1946-47.
* Texts of Interviews to Pu-Chieh, Rong-Qui, Jui-Lon (Family Aisin Goro) and Big-li (personal servant of Pu-Yi between 1924-1957).

See also: ]

==See also==

* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

==External Links==

* http://www.nsjap.com/axis/intro.html (web of japanese local extreme rigth ns movement)

* http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/07/10/MN211532.DTL (Right wing rising Japanese nationalists use comics, film, punk rock to recruit youth)

* http://www.cfr.org/pub4241/eugene_a_matthews/japans_new_nationalists.php (Japan's New Nationalists)

* http://www.cfr.org/pub5266/transcript/the_rise_of_japans_neonationalists_what_it_means_to_the_united_states.php (The Rise of Japan's Neo-Nationalists: What It Means to the United States)

* http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/McNeill.html (Media Intimidation in Japan,A Close Encounter with Hard Japanese Nationalism)


==References==
* http://worldhistoryconnected.press.uiuc.edu/1.1/nozaki.html (I'm Here Alive": History, Testimony, and the Japanese Controversy over "Comfort Women")
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
* http://en.wikipedia.org/Occupied_Japan (over Allied occupation times in Japan)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*


{{JapanEmpireNavbox}}
* ]
{{Ethnic nationalism}}
{{Anti-Chinese sentiment}}
{{Authority control}}


] {{DEFAULTSORT:Japanese Nationalism}}
] ]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 15:43, 11 December 2024

Political ideology
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Japanese nationalism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Flag of Japan
Part of a series on
Nationalism
Nation forming
Core values
Types
OrganizationsList of nationalist organizations
Related concepts

Japanese nationalism is a form of nationalism that asserts the belief that the Japanese are a monolithic nation with a single immutable culture. Over the last two centuries, it has encompassed a broad range of ideas and sentiments. It is useful to distinguish Japanese cultural nationalism from political or state nationalism, since many forms of cultural nationalism, such as those which are associated with folkloric studies, have been hostile to state-fostered nationalism.

In Meiji Japan, nationalist ideology consisted of a blend of native and imported political philosophies, initially developed by the Meiji government to promote national unity and patriotism, first in defense against colonization by Western powers, and later in a struggle to attain equality with the Great Powers.

It evolved throughout the Taishō and Shōwa periods, and was used to justify increasingly extreme ideology, such as fascism, totalitarianism, and overseas expansionism. It has also provided a political and ideological foundation for the actions and atrocities of the Japanese military in the years leading up to and throughout World War II.

Japanese nationalism has been used as justification for revising history textbooks from revisionist perspectives, which denies Japanese imperialist atrocities, including 'comfort women' and the Nanjing Massacre.

Meiji era beginnings (1868–1912)

During the final days of the Tokugawa shogunate, the perceived threat of foreign encroachment, especially after the arrival of Commodore Matthew C. Perry and the signing of the Kanagawa Accord, led to increased prominence to the development of nationalist ideologies. Some prominent daimyō promoted the concept of fukko (a return to the past), while others promoted ōsei (the Emperor's supreme authority). The terms were not mutually exclusive, merging into the sonnō jōi (revere the emperor, expel the barbarians) concept, which in turn was a major driving force in starting the Meiji Restoration.

The Meiji Constitution of 1889 defined allegiance to the State as the citizen's highest duty. The constitution itself contained a mix of political Western practices and traditional Japanese political ideas.

Basis of economic growth

The extreme disparity in economic and military power between Japan and the Western colonial powers was a great cause for concern for the early Meiji leadership. The motto Fukoku kyōhei (enrich the country and strengthen the military) symbolized Meiji period nationalistic policies to provide government support to strengthen strategic industries. Only with a strong economic base could Japan afford to build a strong, modern military along Western lines, and only with a strong economy and military could Japan force a revision of the unequal treaties, such as the Kanagawa Accords. Government policies also laid the basis of later industrialist empires known as the zaibatsu.

Bushidō

As a residue of its widespread use in propaganda during the 19th century, military nationalism in Japan was often known as bushidō (武士道 "the way of the warrior"). The word, denoting a coherent code of beliefs and doctrines about the proper path of the samurai, or what is called generically 'warrior thought' (武家思想, buke shisō), is rarely encountered in Japanese texts before the Meiji era, when the 11 volumes of the Hagakure of Yamamoto Tsunetomo, compiled in the years from 1710 to 1716 where the character combination is employed, was finally published.

Constituted over a long time by house manuals on war and warriors, it gained some official backing with the establishment of the Bakufu, which sought an ideological orthodoxy in the Neo-Confucianism of Zhu Xi tailored for military echelons that formed the basis of the new shogunal government. An important early role was played by Yamaga Sokō in theorizing a Japanese military ethos. After the abolition of the feudal system, the new military institutions of Japan were shaped along European lines, with Western instructors, and the codes themselves modeled on standard models adapted from abroad. The impeccable behavior, in terms of international criteria, displayed by the Japanese military in the Russo-Japanese War was proof that Japan finally had a modern army whose techniques, drilling, and etiquette of the war differed little from that of what prevailed among the Western imperial powers.

The Imperial Rescript for Seamen and Soldiers (1890), presented Japan as a "sacred nation protected by the gods". An undercurrent of traditional warrior values never wholly disappeared, and as Japan slid towards a cycle of repeated crises from the mid-Taishō to early Shōwa eras, the old samurai ideals began to assume importance among more politicized officers in the Imperial Japanese Army. Sadao Araki played an important role in adopting a doctrine of seishin kyōiku (spiritual training) as an ideological backbone for army personnel. As Minister of Education, he supported the integration of the samurai code into the national education system.

Role of Shinto

Main article: State Shinto

In developing the modern concepts of State Shintoism (国家神道, kokka shintō) and emperor worship, various Japanese philosophers tried to revive or purify national beliefs (kokugaku) by removing imported foreign ideas, borrowed primarily from Chinese philosophy. This "Restoration Shintōist Movement" began with Motoori Norinaga in the 18th century. Motoori Norinaga, and later Hirata Atsutane, based their research on the Kojiki and other classic Shintō texts which teach the superiority of the Sun Goddess Amaterasu. This formed the basis for State Shinto, as the Japanese emperor claimed direct descent from Amaterasu. The emperor himself was therefore sacred, and all proclamations of the emperor had thus a religious significance.

After the Meiji Restoration, the new imperial government needed to rapidly modernize the polity and economy of Japan, and the Meiji oligarchy felt that those goals could only be accomplished through a strong sense of national unity and cultural identity, with State Shinto as an essential counterweight to the imported Buddhism of the past, the Christianity and other Western philosophies of the present.

In 1890, the Imperial Rescript on Education was issued, and students were required to ritually recite its oath to "offer yourselves courageously to the State" as well as protect the Imperial family. The practice of emperor worship was further spread by distributing imperial portraits for esoteric veneration. All of these practices used to fortify national solidarity through patriotic centralized observance at shrines are said to have given pre-war Japanese nationalism a tint of mysticism and cultural introversion.

The hakko ichiu (八紘一宇) philosophy became popular during the Second Sino-Japanese War. This came to be regarded by militarists as a doctrine that the emperor was the center of the phenomenal world, lending religious impetus to ideas of Japanese territorial expansion.

Education

Main article: Education in the Empire of Japan

The principal educational emphasis from the Meiji period was on the great importance of traditional national political values, religion, and morality. The Imperial Rescript on Education of 1890 promoted a return to traditional Confucian values in the hierarchal nature of human relations, with the State superior to the Individual, and the Emperor superior to the State. The Japanese state modernized organizationally but preserved its national idiosyncrasies. The attitude reinforced from 1905 was that Japan was to be a powerful nation, equal at least to the Western powers. During the Shōwa period, the educational system was used for supporting the militarized state and preparing future soldiers.

The government published official textbooks for all levels of students and reinforced that with cultural activities, seminars, etc. Emphasis on the texts such as the Kokutai-no-hongi in schools was intended to emphasize the "uniqueness of Japan" from ancient centuries. These cultural courses were supplemented with military and survival courses against foreign invasion.

Apart from indoctrination in nationalism and religion, children and school students received military drills (survival, first aid). These were taken further by the Imperial Youth Federation; college students were trained, and some recruited, for home defense and regular military units. Young women received first aid training. All of these actions were said to be taken to ensure Japan's safety and protect against larger and more dangerous countries.

Nationalist politics

Origin of nationalist structures and parties

Main article: Empire of Japan

In 1882, the Japanese Government organized the Teiseito (Imperial Gubernative Party), one of the first nationalist parties in the country. Starting from the Russo-Japanese War, Japan adopted the moniker "Empire of Japan" ("Dai Nippon Teikoku"), acquiring a colonial empire, with the acquisition of Hokkaido (1869), Ryukyu (1879), Formosa (1895), the Liaodong Peninsula and Karafuto (1905), Joseon (Korea) (1905–10) and the South Seas Mandate islands (1918–19).

The wars against China and Russia were modern and demanded a nationalist expression of patriotic sentiment. From this period, the Yasukuni Shrine (founded in 1869) was converted into a focus for nationalist sentiment and received state patronage until the end of World War II. Yasukuni was dedicated to those Japanese and non-Japanese who had lost their lives serving Japan, and includes all war deaths from domestic and overseas conflicts from 1869 to 1945 (and none from any conflicts since 1945), but also civilians (women and students) and civil administration in colonies and occupied territories.

Between 1926 and 1928, the central government organized the "Peace Preservation Department" (an anti-subversive police section) and prosecuted all local Soviet-sponsored communists who proposed a socialist form of government. The Japanese Army organized the Kempeitai (military police service). Dissent was controlled by the usage of political and press repression, with the Peace Preservation Law permitting police to restrict freedom of expression and freedom to assemble.

From 1925 to 1935, the Nippon Shimbun [ja] (日本新聞) promoted nationalist ideology and sought to influence the Japanese political landscape. In spite of a relatively small overall circulation, it had wide readership among right-wing politicians and advocated the concept of the divine right of the emperor by vigorously attacking Tatsukichi Minobe's “emperor organ theory”.

Realities of political power

Kyokujitsu-ki (the sun-with rays-flag) was the ensign of the Imperial Japanese Navy; it is now employed by the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force ships.
Naval ensign of the battleship Mikasa

Since the Meiji restoration, the central figure of the state was the Emperor. According to the constitution, the emperor was Head of State (article 4) and Supreme Commander of the Army and the Navy (article 11). Emperor Hirohito was also, from 1937, the commander of the Imperial General Headquarters. Japanese citizens were rallied to the "Defensive State" or "Consensus State", in which all efforts of the nation supported collective objectives, by guidance from national myths, history, and dogma — thus obtaining a "national consensus". Democratic institutions were installed in 1890 with the promulgation of a constitution and continued to acquire legitimacy until the 1920s when they fell into disrepute.

Concerns that irresponsible political parties could have too great an influence over vital military affairs introduced a rule that the Army alone should nominate the Army Minister in civilian government. This permitted the army to have a de facto veto over civilian governments by having the power to refuse to nominate a candidate. This policy was introduced in law in 1900 but abolished in 1913. It was reintroduced in 1936, cementing military influence over the government after that time.

The political system of Japan became subverted by the military throughout the 1930s from repeated attempted coups, and independent militarist interventions. The invasion of Manchuria after elements in the army manufactured an incident to justify a takeover was accomplished without instruction from the Tokyo government. This showed the impotence of the civilian government to have any influence over the impulses of the army. Governments become increasingly passive, allowing agency and direction of the state to fall to disparate competing elements of the army. The role of the emperor remained highly prestigious, with various factions competing to advocate their interpretation of what the emperor "truly" wanted.

After the war, scrutiny of the emperor's role in the war and militarism intensified. For many historians such as Akira Fujiwara, Akira Yamada, Peter Wetzler, Herbert Bix and John Dower, the work done by Douglas MacArthur and SCAP during the first months of the occupation of Japan to exonerate Hirohito and all the imperial family from criminal prosecutions in the Tokyo tribunal was the predominant factor in the campaign to diminish in retrospect the role played by the emperor during the war. They argue that the post-war view focused on the imperial conferences and missed the numerous "behind the chrysanthemum curtain" meetings where the real decisions were made between Hirohito, his chiefs of staff, and the cabinet. For Fujiwara, "the thesis that the Emperor, as an organ of responsibility, could not reverse cabinet decision, is a myth fabricated after the war."

Political ideas

During the 1920s, right-wing nationalist beliefs became an increasingly dominant force. State support for Shinto encouraged a belief in the mythological history of Japan and thus led to mysticism and cultural chauvinism. Some secret societies took up ultranationalism and Japan-centered radical ideas. They included: Genyōsha (Black Ocean Society, 1881), Kokuryu-kai (Amur River Society, or Black Dragon Society, 1901), movements dedicated to overseas Japanese expansion to the north; Nihon Kokusai Kai (Japanese Patriotic Society, 1919), founded by Tokoname Takejiro; Sekka Boshidan (Anti-Red League) founded at the same time as the Japanese Communist Party; and the Kokuhonsha (State Basis Society) founded in 1924 by Baron Hiranuma Kiichirō, for the preservation of the unique national character of Japan and its special mission in Asia.

Some of the nationalist ideas can be attributed to the ideologue Ikki Kita (1885–1937), an Amur River Society member. In his 1919 book An Outline Plan for the Reorganization of Japan, Kita proposed a military coup d'état to promote the supposed true aims of the Meiji Restoration. This book was banned, but certain military circles read in it in the early 1930s. Kita's plan was phrased in terms of freeing the Emperor from weak or treasonous counselors. After suspending the constitution, and dissolving the Diet, the Emperor and his military defenders should work for a "collectivist direct voluntarism" to unify people and leaders. Harmony with the working classes would be sought by the abolition of the aristocracy and austerity for the Imperial House. Overseas, Japan would free Asia of Western influence. The Amur River Society was later instrumental in the Manchurian incident.

Political nationalist movements

The Japanese Navy was in general terms more traditionalist, in defending ancient values and the sacred nature of the Emperor; the Japanese Army was more forward-looking, in the sense of valuing primarily strong leadership, as is evidenced by the use of the coup and direct action. The Navy typically preferred political methods. The Army, ultimately, was the vehicle for the hyper-nationalists, anti-communists, anticapitalists, antiparliamentarians, and Nationalist-Militarist ideals.

The military was considered politically "clean" in terms of political corruption, additionally assuming responsibility for 'restoring' the security of the nation. The armed forces took up criticism of the traditional democratic parties and regular government for many reasons (low funds for the armed forces, compromised national security, weakness of the leaders). They were also, by their composition, closely aware of the effects of economic depression on the middle and lower classes, and the communist threat.

Both branches gained power as they administered the exterior provinces and military preparations.

Nationalist right in the 1920s

Other nationalist rightist groups in the 1920s were the Jinmu Kai (Emperor Jimmu Society), Tenketo Kai (Heaven Spade Party), Ketsumeidan (Blood Fraternity) and Sakura Kai (Cherry Blossom Society). This last was founded by Dr. Shūmei Ōkawa, professor of the Colonization Academy, and radical defender of expansionism and military armed revolution at home. Amongst members were Army officers implicated in the Manchuria Affair, such as Kingoro Hashimoto, and Ishikawa Kanishi. Okawa served as a conduit by which Kita Ikki's ideas reached young nationalist officers on the right.

Hideki Tōjō (right) and Nobusuke Kishi, October 1943

Violent coups took place, and the Kwantung Army made, in effect unilaterally, the decision to invade Manchuria. This was then treated as a fait accompli by Government and Emperor.

Doctrines

The Amau Doctrine (the "Asian Monroe Doctrine") stated that Japan assumed the total responsibility for peace in Asia. Minister Kōki Hirota proclaimed "a special zone, anti-communist, pro-Japanese and pro-Manchukuo" and that Northern China was a "fundamental part" of Japanese national existence, in announcing a "holy war" against the Soviet Union and China as the "national mission".

During 1940 Prince Konoe proclaimed the Shintaisei (New National Structure), making Japan into an "advanced state of National Defense", and the creation of the Taisei Yokusankai (Imperial Authority Assistance Association), for organizing a centralized "consensus state". Associated are the government creation of the Tonarigumi (residents' committees). Other ideological creations of the time were the book "Shinmin no Michi" (臣民の道), the "Imperial Way" or "War Party" (Kodoha) Army party, the "Yamato spirit" (Yamato-damashii), and the idea of hakko ichiu (which directly translates to "8 corners under one roof", that means, "one house in which every people can live" or "everyone is family"), "Religion and Government Unity" (Saisei itchi), and Kokka Sodoin Ho (General Mobilization Right).

The official academic texts included Kokutai no Hongi and Shinmin no Michi. Both presented a view of Japan's history and the Japanese ideal to unite East and West.

Geostrategy

Main article: Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere
Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere at its greatest extent

The economic doctrines of the "Yen block" were in 1941 transformed to the "Great Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere" Plan, as a basis for the Japanese national finances, and conquest plans. There was a history of perhaps two decades behind these moves.

The Japanese theorists, such as Saneshige Komaki, concerned with Mainland Asia, knew the geostrategic theory of Halford Mackinder, expressed in the book Democratic Ideas and Reality. He discussed why the 'World Island' of Eurasia and Africa was dominant, and why the key to this was the 'Central Land' in Central Asia. This is protected from sea attack, by deserts and mountains, and is vulnerable only on its west side, and to advanced technology from Europe.

Mackinder declared that: "Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; Who rules the heartland commands the World-Island; Who rules the World-Island commands the World". These central Asiatic lands included: all of the Soviet Union, except the Pacific coast, west of the Volga River; all Mongolia, Sinkiang, Tibet and Iran. This zone is vast and possesses natural resources and raw materials, does not possess major farming possibilities, and has a very little population. Mackinder thought in terms of land and sea power: the latter can outflank the former, and carry out distant logistical operations, but needs adequate bases.

These geopolitical ideas coincided with the theories of Lieutenant Colonel Kanji Ishiwara, sent in 1928 to Manchuria to spy. The Army was on the Strike North Group side. The Navy, on the other hand, was interested in the southerly direction of expansion. An extended debate ensued, resolved in the end by the stern experience of Japan's armed conflicts with the Soviet Union in 1938–39. This tipped the balance towards the 'South' plan and the Pearl Harbor attack that precipitated the Pacific War in 1941.

Other ideological lines

The Showa Studies Society was another "think tank" for future leaders of a radical totalitarian Japan, led by Count Yoriyasu Arima. He was a supporter of radical political experiments. With Fumimaro Konoe and Fusanosuke Kuhara, they created a revolutionary radical-right policy.

These revolutionary groups later had the help of several important personages, making reality to some certain ideas of the nationalist-militarist policy with practical work in Manchukuo. They included General Hideki Tōjō, chief of Kempeitai and leader of Kwantung Army; Yosuke Matsuoka, who served as president of the (South Manchuria Railway Company) and Foreign Affairs Minister; and Naoki Hoshino, an army ideologist who organized the government and political structure of Manchukuo. Tojo later became War Minister and Prime Minister in the Konoe cabinet, Matsuoka Foreign Minister, and Hoshino chief of Project departments charged with establishing a new economic structure for Japan. Some industrialists representative of this ideological strand were Ichizō Kobayashi, President of Tokio Gasu Denki, setting the structure for the Industry and Commerce ministry, and Shōzō Murata, representing the Sumitomo Group becoming Communication Minister.

Other groups created were the Government Imperial Aid Association. Involved in both was Colonel Kingoro Hashimoto, who proposed a Nationalist single party dictatorship, combined with a state-run economy. The militarists had strong support from the wealthy owners of major industries.

The "New Asia Day" celebration was to remember the sacred mission of extending influence to nearby Asian nations.

The Japanese government, possibly following the German example of a "Worker's Front" State Syndicate, ultimately organized the Nation Service Society to group all the trades unions in the country. All syndicates of the "Japanese Workers Federation" were integrated into this controlling body.

Control of communications media

Main article: Censorship in the Empire of Japan

The press and other communication media were managed under the Information Department of the Home Ministry. Radio Tokyo was charged with disseminating all official information around the world. The radio was transmitted in English, Dutch, three Chinese dialects, Malay, Thai, as well Japanese to Southeast Asia; and the Islamic world had programs broadcast in Hindi, Burmese, Arabic, English, and French. In Hawaii, there were radio programs in English and Japanese. Other daily transmissions were to Europe, South and Central America, eastern areas of South America, and the US, with Australia and New Zealand receiving broadcasts too.

The official press agency Domei Tsushin was connected with the Axis powers' press agencies such as DNB, Transoceanic, the Italian agency Stefani and others. Local and Manchukoan newspapers such as Manchurian Daily News (Japanese-owned) were under the control of these institutions and only published officially approved notices and information.

Nationalist symbology

See also: National symbols of Japan
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Shiragiku (the chrysanthemum)

The shiragiku (lit. "white chrysanthemum") or more common chrysanthemum flower was much used as an imperial symbol. It alludes to the Chrysanthemum Throne, the traditional seat of Japanese emperors.

Banzai

The traditional cheer was given to the Emperor and other dignitaries, or on special commemorations, was Tenno Heika Banzai (天皇陛下万歳 or 萬歲, 'long live the Emperor') or the shortened form, Banzai.

The latter term, which means "ten thousand years," is an expression of Chinese origin (万歳) adopted by the Japanese in the Meiji period. In its original sense, it is meant to represent an indeterminably lengthy time and is used to wish long life to a person, state, or project. As co-opted by the Japanese, it originally was simply used in this sense to wish long life to the Emperor (and by extension the Japanese state). As the war progressed, it became the typical Japanese war cry or victory shout and was used to encourage Imperial troops in combat.

Other nationalist symbols

Post-war developments

Part of a series on
Conservatism in Japan
Ideologies
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Literature
Politicians
PartiesActive

Defunct

OrganisationsActive

Defunct

Media
Movements
Related topics
See also: Potsdam Declaration and Surrender of Japan
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In February 1946, General Douglas MacArthur was set the task of drafting a model constitution to serve as a guide for the Japanese people. The U.S. intention was to ensure that the sources of Japanese militarism were rooted out through fundamental reforms of the Japanese government, society, and economic structure. Perhaps the most lasting effect that came out of this constitution is Article 9 that reads:

"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes. To accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as another war potential, will never be maintained. The right to belligerency of the state will not be recognized."

With the renunciation of war and military power, Japan looked to the United States for security. As the Cold War began, the United States fostered a closer relationship with Japan due to the latter's strategic location in respect to the USSR. Japan became, as stated by the Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone, an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for the United States. Ensuing from this close relationship with the United States, Japan hoped that in time their country would become the "third leg in a triangle involving two superpowers." While the mainstream Japanese politics maintained a pro-American attitude, scholars noted that the nationalist 'Other' during post-war Japan was the United States. Left-wing nationalists criticized the United States's military presence whilst the conservative nationalists criticized the imposed military limitation by the United States. China later substituted the United States as the nationalist Other in contemporary Japanese politics . In academia, some scholars argue that postwar Japanese intellects and politicians constructed the mono-ethnic identity through public discourses and education. Japanese elites' tendency towards homogeneity and ethnic nationalism is from their desire to differentiate postwar Japanese identity from pre-war imperialist identity and multi-ethnic identity that include formerly colonized ethnic groups.

Since the 1960s, economic growth in the Japanese miracle periods started to mitigate public distrust towards the central government. Japanese economic progress after World War II undermined the appeal of pre-war militarist nationalism, showing a path to prosperity was possible without colonies. The 1970s witnessed Japan's adoption of three fundamental tenets that would seek to define and direct Japanese internationalism, all concerning the need for Japanese initiatives in fostering a liberal internationalism. Some criticism points out that politicians in the 1970s selectively remembered the past, preferring narratives of Japan as atomic weapon victim to consciously and unconsciously alienate Japan from its undesired aggressive past. Some scholars note the apolitical nature of the 1964 Tokyo Olympics and the 1970 Osaka World Exposition, which allow politicians to forge Japan as peaceful and internationalist for a unified national identity.

The rather implicit elite advocacy of conservative nationalism has become more salient since the 1990s, where regional competitions from Asian tigers, and later China, created economic anxieties which reflected in political divisions. Many scholars have pointed out that the liberal internationalism has started to turn into conservative revisionist nationalism since the 1990s. The clashes of nationalism and the contemporary rise of ultra-nationalism, accompanied by military expansions and historical revisionism, are the hot topics of current academic discussions on post-war Japanese nationalism. The illiberal turn of nationalism started with new right-wing movements that created history textbooks from revisionist perspectives, which denies Japanese imperialist atrocities, including 'comfort women' issues and Nanjing Massacre. Their emergences can be seen as a direct discontent towards pacifists' low posture to former colonized countries but also motivated by economic anxiety in globalization. Although right-wing movements surfaced in the 1990s, the Japanese public still remain largely pacific.

Since the 2000s, xenophobic online posts and nationalist claims against foreigners, mostly Chinese and Koreans, have risen due to anxieties over economic growth, regional competition, and globalization. Prime ministers Junichiro Koizumi and Shinzo Abe's visits to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine has created huge controversies and received international backlashes. Japanese top political leaders have started to adopt more explicit conservatism nationalist stances and expansionist military ambitions. Abe tended to use ambiguous terms to describe his national agenda on controversial issues such as history education and intentionally avoided backlash from the public to equate him as an imperial leader. In order to justify military expansions, Abe framed his security agenda as proactive pacifism, enabling Japan to exercise collective self-defense. Japan's remilitarization is mostly due to security concerns of North Korea's nuclear weapon program and China's rise in the East, as well as aligning with the US's aim to create alliances to contain China's global rise and deter North Korea's nuclear threat. Both the Obama administration and the Trump administration encouraged Japan's rearmament. Trump openly called for rapid Japanese rearmament, more due to discontent that the US support Japan while Japan does not have to do anything in return, less on prudence. Some scholars argue that the resurgence of ultra-nationalist tendency as solely an elite-driven process as the public remains pacifist, and overall public support is not required for politicians to achieve a nationalist agenda because of the low voter turnout.

Ethnic nationalism

Main article: Ethnic nationalism in Japan

Ultranationalism

Main article: Ultranationalism (Japan) See also: Statism in Shōwa Japan

Ultranationalism values the emperor's authority around the 'state' and advocates the militaristic agenda. There are differences of opinion among Japanese liberal scholars on whether or not Japan's ultranationalist movements can be viewed as "fascism".

Uyoku dantai

Main article: Uyoku dantai

In 1996, the National Police Agency estimated that there were over 1,000 extremist right-wing groups in Japan, with about 100,000 members in total. These groups are known in Japanese as Uyoku dantai. While there are political differences among the groups, they generally carry a philosophy of anti-leftism, hostility towards China, North Korea, South Korea and occasionally the United States of America, and justification of Japan's role in World War II. Uyoku dantai groups are well known for their highly visible propaganda vehicles fitted with loudspeakers and prominently marked with the name of the group and propaganda slogans. The vehicles play patriotic or wartime-era songs.

Activists affiliated with such groups have used Molotov cocktails and time bombs to intimidate moderate politicians and public figures, including former Deputy Foreign Minister Hitoshi Tanaka and Fuji Xerox Chairman Yotaro Kobayashi. An ex-member of a right-wing group set fire to LDP politician Koichi Kato's house. Koichi Kato and Yotaro Kobayashi had spoken out against Koizumi's visits to Yasukuni Shrine.

Openly revisionist, Nippon Kaigi is considered "the biggest right-wing organization in Japan".

Nationalist right-wing and far-right political parties

Bibliography

  • Behr, Edward. The Last Emperor ISBN 0-553-34474-9, Bantam, 1987
  • Newman, Joseph. Goodbye Japan, published in New York, 1942
  • Moore, Frederick. With Japan's Leaders, published in New York, 1942
  • Whitney Hall, John. Japanese Empire, Vol.20, 1967.
  • Emmott, Bill. "Japan's English Lessons" Foreign Policy, 140 (2004)
  • Kase, Yuri. "Japan's Nonnuclear Weapons Policy on the Changing Security Environment" World Affairs, 165.3 (2003)
  • Lincoln, Edward. "Japan: Using Power Narrowly" Washington Quarterly, 27.1 (Winter 2003/2004)
  • Ozawa, Terutomo. "The New Economic Nationalism and the Japanese Disease": The Conundrum of Managed Economic Growth" Journal of Economic Issues, v30 (1996)
  • Pyle, Kenneth B. The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in a New Era, (Washington, D.C.)

Other historical references

Asian and Pacific geopolitics

  • Shaw, B. Earl, article "United States Pacific Defense" in Van Valkenburg, Samuel Book America at War Prentice-Hall, (1942).
  • Weigerth, W. Hans." Haushofer and the Pacific", Foreign Affairs, XX (1942), P.732-742.
  • Mackinder, J. Halford, Democratic Ideals and Reality, New York, Holt, (1942).
  • Bowman, Isaiah. The New World, Yonker-on-Hudson, World Book, (1928), 4th Ed.

Official publications of the Japanese and Manchukuo governments

  • Imperial Japanese Government Railways, Official guides to Eastern Asia, I, Manchuria and Chosen, Tokio, 1913 and later years.
  • South Manchurian Railway Company Ed, 1929. - Progress in Manchuria (Report), 1907–28
  • Manchurian Year Books (various editions)
  • Far East Yearbooks (from 1941)
  • Review of Contemporary Manchuria (since 1937)
  • Review of Contemporary Manchuria, 1939. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government.
  • Manchuria Annals, Vol.,1933-39. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government.
  • Hayashide, Kenjiro, Epochal journey to Nippon. Official Publications of Manchukuo Government.
  • Japan Yearbook, Tokio, (since 1941)
  • Tokio Nichi-Nichi, Osaka Mainichi (newspapers), English language supplements (from the 1930s)
  • The newspapers Nippon Dempo and Tenshin Nichi-Nichi Shimbun, Review Bungei Shunju
  • Voice of the People of Manchukuo. Manchoukuoan Government edition.
  • Japan-Manchukuo Yearbook (the 1940s)
  • Governments-General of Taiwan, Chosen and Karafuto, Official Annual Reports on the administration of these Provinces (1924–1926 and other years).
  • Mitsubishi Economics Research Bureau. "Japanese Trade and Industry, Present and Future", Mcmillan, London (1936)
  • Reviews and other publications of Kokusai Bunka Shinkokai (International Cultural Relations Society), Tokyo (the 1930s/40s).
  • Publications of Kan-Ichi Uchida, Tokyo, Kobunsha Co. (same period)

Notes

  1. There are various notation for "Nationalism" in Japan:

References

  1. ^ Tanabe, Shunsuke (March 2021). "Sociological studies on nationalism in Japan". International Sociology. 36 (2): 171–182. doi:10.1177/02685809211005347. ISSN 0268-5809. S2CID 234834919.
  2. Grant K. Goodman, Japan and the Dutch 1600-1853, Curzon Press, 2000, pp.1-8
  3. Kozo Yamamura, "Success ill-gotten? The role of Meiji militarism in Japan's technological progress." Journal of Economic History 37.1 (1977): 113-135.
  4. Hall, Japan From Prehistory to Modern Times, page 328
  5. "戦前最大の右派新聞約10年分見つかる". NHK. 2019-08-09.
  6. "The Fall of Freedom - How a newspaper led Japan to war". NHK. 2019-10-12.
  7. Shōwa tennō no 15 nen sensō (The Shōwa emperor fifteen years war), Aoki Shoten, 1991, p.122
  8. "The Constitution of Japan".
  9. Davis, River (29 November 2019). "Yasuhiro Nakasone, Japanese Leader Who Revived Postwar Military, Dies". Wall Street Journal.
  10. ^ Woodward, Jude (2017-08-30), "The rise of Japanese nationalism", The US vs China, Manchester University Press, doi:10.7228/manchester/9781526121998.003.0006, ISBN 9781526121998, retrieved 2022-05-23
  11. ^ Hagstrom, Linus, ed. (2015-10-05), "The rise of the Chinese 'Other' in Japan's construction of identity: Is China a focal point of Japanese nationalism?", Identity Change and Foreign Policy, Routledge, pp. 107–128, doi:10.4324/9781315679662, ISBN 978-1-315-67966-2
  12. 小熊, 英二 (2002). A genealogy of 'Japanese' self-images. Trans Pacific Press. ISBN 1-876843-83-7. OCLC 49832735.
  13. ^ Wilson, Sandra (2011-01-28). "Exhibiting a new Japan: the Tokyo Olympics of 1964 and Expo '70 in Osaka*". Historical Research. 85 (227): 159–178. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2281.2010.00568.x. ISSN 0950-3471.
  14. ^ Droubie, Paul (November 2011). "Phoenix arisen: Japan as peaceful internationalist at the 1964 Tokyo Summer Olympics". The International Journal of the History of Sport. 28 (16): 2309–2322. doi:10.1080/09523367.2011.626683. ISSN 0952-3367. S2CID 159683017.
  15. Ijiri, Hidenori (December 1990). "Sino-Japanese Controversy since the 1972 Diplomatic Normalization". The China Quarterly. 124: 639–661. doi:10.1017/s030574100003143x. ISSN 0305-7410. S2CID 153597626.
  16. Pilling, David, ed. (2 January 2020). Bending adversity : Japan and the art of survival. Penguin Books, Limited. ISBN 978-0-14-199053-8. OCLC 1263746301.
  17. ^ "Nationalism and history in contemporary Japan", Asian Nationalisms Reconsidered, Routledge, pp. 188–201, 2015-12-22, doi:10.4324/9781315739601-24, ISBN 978-1-315-73960-1, S2CID 217898344, retrieved 2022-05-23
  18. Higuchi, Naoto (2021-01-28), "Japan's Postcolonial Hate Speech", Hate Speech in Japan, Cambridge University Press, pp. 363–380, doi:10.1017/9781108669559.017, ISBN 9781108669559, S2CID 234015678, retrieved 2022-05-23
  19. "Political dynamics of contemporary Japanese nationalism", Asian Nationalisms Reconsidered, Routledge, pp. 176–187, 2015-12-22, doi:10.4324/9781315739601-23, ISBN 978-1-315-73960-1, retrieved 2022-05-23
  20. Akimoto, Daisuke (2018). The Abe doctrine : Japan's proactive pacifism and security strategy. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-981-13-5664-3. OCLC 1130784112.
  21. Kingston, Jeff (2018-08-21), "One-Hand Clapping: Japanese Nationalism in the Abe Era", Japan and Asia’s Contested Order, Asia Today, Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 147–163, doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0256-5_7, ISBN 978-981-13-0255-8, S2CID 158074981, retrieved 2022-05-23
  22. Clemons, Steven (2006-08-27). "The Rise of Japan's Thought Police". The Washington Post.
  23. Muneo Narusawa, "Abe Shinzo: Japan’s New Prime Minister a Far-Right Denier of History" Archived 2015-03-16 at the Wayback Machine, The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 11, Issue 1, No. 1, January 14, 2013,
  24. The Economist of Britain on January 5, 2013. Cited in: William L. Brooks (2013), Will history again trip up Prime Minister Shinzo Abe? The Asahi Shimbun, May 7, 2013

External links

Empire of Japan
Overview
Emperors
Symbols
Policies
Government
Administration
(ministries)
Legislative and
deliberative bodies
Military
Armed Forces
Imperial Japanese Army
Imperial Japanese Navy
History
Meiji era
Taishō era
Shōwa era
Territories
Colonies
Puppet states
Occupied territories
Ideology
Other topics
Ethnic nationalism
Nationalisms
in
Africa
North Africa
East Africa
Nigeria
Southern Africa
Americas
North America
Caribbean
South America
Asia
Middle East
Eastern Asia
Southern Asia
South-eastern Asia
Northern & Middle Asia
South Caucasus
Europe
Southeastern Europe
Central Europe
Eastern Europe
North Caucasus
Volga Region
Western Europe
United Kingdom
Southern Europe
Italy
Spain
Northern Europe
Oceania
Pan-nationalism
Movements
Projects
Other
  • Note: Forms of nationalism based primarily on ethnic groups are listed above. This does not imply that all nationalists with a given ethnicity subscribe to that form of ethnic nationalism.
Anti-Chinese sentiment (Sinophobia)
Background
By persecutor
By country
By institution
By incident
17th century
18th century
19th century
20th century
21st century
By victim
19th century
20th century
21st century
Slurs
Related
Categories: