| Revision as of 06:16, 23 April 2007 editIdeogram (talk | contribs)11,726 edits rv← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:13, 13 January 2024 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors44,332 edits Forth (programming language) listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (266 intermediate revisions by 75 users not shown) | |||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| == Archives == | == Archives == | ||
| ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| ]. ] 05:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Top-importance computer science articles == | |||
| ]. ] 23:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Ideogram, | |||
| ]. ] 11:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through ] and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as ]) are really as important as ] or the ubiquitous ], as opposed to simply of ] (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —'']'' 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ]. ] 12:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] |
:OK ] (]) 20:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Birthright Israel == | |||
| ]. ] 14:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ]. ] 08:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == I dropped NE2 a note == | |||
| I agree that he shouldn't be deleting those comments. But they are mild personal attacks. ]. Please stop making them. ] 09:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't expect it will continue, but I hope you realize he expressed contempt for the entire GA process. --] 09:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please stop removing comments. You have removed ]'s comment twice. --] 09:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Fixed. --] 09:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :(edit conflict) That would appear to be accidental as a side effect of editing back to the last version before you deleted his comments. However, it's correct that an editor has a responsibility not to undo other edits needlessly. | |||
| :Also, ], both of you. ] 09:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Near-3RR violation == | |||
| You have violated 3RR on ]. However, due to your self-revert, you now stand at three reverts on the page. Please discuss contested changes on the talk page instead of in edit summaries. —<sup>]</sup>''']''' ('']'') 22:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Taiwanese film== | |||
| Hi please allow time for the Lists of film to develop. I promise eventually we'll have a great documental list of the cinema of each country completed. THat list os now encyclopedic providing details in a film chronology -very good for understanding Taiwanese cinema THankyou ] <sup>]</sup> 14:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Life == | |||
| You wrote "What can I say, I have no life". I wish that you can feel entirely good about contributing here. If you choose this to be your life, what's wrong with that? I've seen this argument so often used as a here as an allround cudgel (albeit not against me) that it makes me sick. If someone said that to me, I'd say "Are you leading such a perfect life that you need to tell others what to do with their lives?", or something like that. — ] 00:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't worry, I enjoy insulting myself. I am actually quite happy contributing to Misplaced Pages. --] 00:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: :-) | |||
| :: BTW, I just joined IRC, but it looks quite dead to me. Can you see the three lines I entered? — ] 01:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Certified.Gangsta == | |||
| Hi, Ideogram, I've seen this thread about {{user|Certified.Gangsta}} on ]: ] and I believe his ] such as revert warring against consensus has gone too far. I believe it is time to file a ] against Certified.Gangsta. I think there is enough evidence and users to support this RFC. You can reply here. Regards, ] 13:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : I don't think there's any point talking to Bishonen about Certified.Gangsta. --] (]) 11:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Editor review == | |||
| Thank you for your review. It is sincerely appreciated. I am not sure I would like to be an ], but I am certainly interested in continuing my efforts in dispute resolution. However, I am a bit adverse to looking towards ], simply because I have a strong preference for an open ] process. I am unsure I would be comfortable with the high level of secrecy required in MEDCOM. I know this may limit my DR "career" a bit in Misplaced Pages, but with ], ], ] and ], it seems as though I can still remain quite active and provide a solid contribution. I have been taking a "buffet" approach to some extant because I'm trying to immerse myself a bit more in the broader Misplaced Pages world and find my place. So far, I've found ] and dispute resolution to be very interesting and accomodating to me, and I will probably continue to expand my participation in those areas. I've checked out ] at your suggestion and it certainly seems interesting, though I have some reservations. Per both reviews I've thus far received, I will likely look towards spending a little time each day on RC patrol. Thank you also for your many kind compliments, though I think you may give me more credit than I am due. Thank you again for your feedback. ] 15:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I personally also prefer MedCab's approach over MedCom, but there are many mediators who view MedCab as a stepping-stone to MedCom and there is nothing wrong with that. I am glad to have helped you. --] 02:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==LaRouche Intro MedCab case== | |||
| Why did you change the status to "closed"? It isn't even close to being resolved. Also, is it proper for SlimVirgin to remove her name as one of the parties to the dispute? --] 20:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :This case is not being mediated as part of MedCab. Anyone can remove themselves from the list of parties. --] 20:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Why did you change the status to "closed"? --] 14:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I told you, it's not part of MedCab. --] 16:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == IRC cloak request == | |||
| I am ideogram on freenode and I would like | |||
| the cloak wikipedia/ideogram. Thanks. --] 02:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit warring: Ideogram and Certified.Gangsta== | |||
| : Copied to both talk pages. | |||
| Glancing at your recent edits I notice that you've both been edit warring quite a lot over the past few days on at least two articles: ] ( | |||
| ) and ] . | |||
| : This isn't the sort of behavior we expect from established editors, and it certainly isn't helping to build a consensus on article content. Please avoid further edit warring and use the talk page to seek agreement. Because you're both edit warring on unrelated articles, it also looks as if you may both have a personal conflict. If so, I recommend that you both attempt to resolve that by mediation. --] 17:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I have been trying to discuss with him but he does not respond. --] 17:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| {{block|editwarning}} | |||
| ==No personal attacks please== | |||
| The community has had a lot of patience with you, but it may run out if you keep behaving this atrociously. What, for instance, do you mean by posting a on my page some nine or ten hours after I asked you not to post on it at all? '''"Do not revert war"'''— what's that supposed to mean? I don't revert war. (But you obviously do.) I reverted you '''once'''. ] | ] 21:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC). | |||
| :You call that a personal attack? That's insane. And I thought '''you''' were the one who didn't think people should be blocked for personal attacks. --] 21:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Bish claiming to speak for the community is just laughable. --] 22:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : oh pfft "the community". Certified.Gangsta fanclub community, perhaps. --] (]) 00:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hey, I just wanted to let you know that a second person has certified the basis for this dispute, so the RfC is now approved. Accordingly, you may wish to make a statement outlining your point of view or add additional evidence to the page. Hopefully moving things into the formal dispute resolution process will centralize discussion and minimize bloodshed.--] 04:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I saw that, thanks. I will add more information soon but I am kind of tired right now. --] 04:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Do you think it would be helpful to dig up all the diffs of C.G deleting well-meaning discussion/warnings etc from his talk page? It could evidence his unwillingness to discuss/heed warnings etc. There's a tonne of the stuff, I think. --] (]) 23:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Sure, I can do that. But I'll wait to see if he's coming back. --] 23:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ]... == | |||
| ...has a broken ref, specifically #18.--] 18:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == What's going on? == | |||
| Ideogram, I don't know who you are... Are you some kind of moderator? | |||
| Why are you threatening to block me? Have you read the revisions that I've made? I'm the one who has provided sources and justifications for my changes, which rectify erroneous information. Why are they not getting the warning for reverting without justification or support? I don't commit vandalism. I only make changes to correct inaccuracies that are largely beyond dispute. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 02:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| == A Bit Harsh == | |||
| A bit harsh! You went straight to Template:Uw-delete3! What about assuming good faith? From now on Ideogram, I recommend Template:Uw-delete1 to start! Your own user pages says Assume good faith. I dont want to ask you again, So please calm down. Thankyou ] 02:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == People's Republic of China == | |||
| Ideogram, what's the deal with editing the page? How come you reverted my deletion of the listing of the dynasties in the table on the PRC page with no justification? How come you threaten me, saying that I should be banned from editing when you refuse to justify your changes? | |||
| You seemed to indicate that some kind of consensus is needed. On the discussion page I posted the following below, and have received no arguments finding fault with my reasoning. Can I delete the irrelevant information about other governments in China, or will you revert it without explanation and threaten me again? | |||
| My points: | |||
| I don't believe this information is relevant to an article about the People's Republic of China. That would be completely appropriate to the article about China, but this is specifically about the People's Republic, i.e. under communist rule. Thus, the salient date is the founding of the PRC in 1949.Penser 12:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Penser | |||
| For example, if you look at the page for the Soviet Union, it only includes the dates when Russia was under Communist control. It doesn't include all important dates in Russian history, because that's not relevant to the period of Soviet control, which is what the article is about. Penser 13:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Penser | |||
| ] 07:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Penser | |||
| :Don't put this here. You need to convince the other editors of the article. Put it on ]. --] 07:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Taiwan-ROC mass moves== | |||
| Hi. Have you provided rationals for these mass moves? Is this being discussed somewhere central? Thanks. ] 18:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, they are being discussed at ]. --] 20:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. ] 20:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == 209.43.23.38 == | |||
| Thank you for making a report {{#if:209.43.23.38|about {{userblock|209.43.23.38}}}} on ]. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and ] to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to ] users if they have received a recent final ] (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) ''and'' they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. {{{2|Thank you!}}} <!--Template:Uw-AIV--> <font face="monospace">]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></font> 20:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Gangsta == | |||
| so what's going on with gangsta's rfc? I think he's BSing about holiday. ] 16:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The RFC will stay open for a while and people can comment on it. I see he just came back, which is not a surprise. But I don't think he will be able to accomplish anything. --] 07:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Ideogram. Please note that ] is not tolerated on Misplaced Pages, and any statement about living persons must be sourced per ]. All future infractions may bring a ], so please be careful. Thank you. ] (], ]) 15:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == GR promoted to FA == | |||
| I don't know whether you've looked at ] recently, but it was promoted to FA earlier today. Many thanks indeed for your thoughtful comments on the article, which have helped us bring it up to FA standard. All the best, --] | ] 11:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Do not violate consensus == | |||
| Stop violate decisions made by the community at ] and ]. - ] 17:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Just because the category exists doesn't mean there is consensus for what articles belong in it. --] 17:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Read the opinion of the community. - ] 17:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::It doesn't say what you think. --] 18:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Don't pretend they didn't say. Just that you don't agree with them. - ] 18:08, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Naming conventions == | |||
| Where is this list subpage you speak of? ]+(]) 21:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It's been transcluded onto the main WikiProject China talk page, so you can still see it, but edits to that section go to a subpage which won't show up on your watchlist unless you watchlist that subpage. --] 22:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Can you give me a link to this "sub-page"? ]+(]) 22:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::]. --] 22:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == S.H.E importance scale == | |||
| Awww, you changed it to its proper importance level. It was hilarious telling people that the article was listed as higher importance than the Geography of Taiwan while it lasted. Thanks for the change though. ;) - ] 11:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Project suggestion == | |||
| Thanks for your kind words. I'll bear Rom of Chin in mind next time I feel like undertaking a project! All the best. --] | ] 20:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| A request for arbitration has been filed. As a named party you will probably want to comment on the proposal. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 06:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikiproject Taiwan A-class evaluation == | |||
| I was wondering who I can ask for an A-class evaluation/review for the ] article (you perhaps?). I was recommended for peer review, but it's been nearly three weeks since I posted the request (with no response), so I posted another request on the league of copyeditors, which has gotten no response over the past week. Thanks in advance. - ] 22:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :We don't really have an established A-class review process. Until we do, we aren't giving A-class to any articles. --] 22:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | Hello, | ||
| I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. ] (]) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 00:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ]<sup>(])</sup> 11:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ''']''' (]) 22:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == amendment to naming convention == | |||
| == List of libraries in Taipei listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| I have a suggestion for naming conventions related to Mandopop and Cantopop articles (although that would make things more complicated I think...) | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''List of libraries in Taipei'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| When people say Taiwan on a pop music article, it means the music industry that is primarily located in the Republic of China. China in a C-pop article would imply the music industry located on the mainland, while Hong Kong is pretty self-explanatory. - ] 19:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 12:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Be very bold, very blatant, and very obvious== | |||
| When reverting Instantnood's future puppets. I noticed we were both reverting Privacy in a similarly speedy fashion last week, so, just a warning. ] ] 01:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your email == | |||
| Per your request, your user page and the other user subpage you indicated have been deleted. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Err, can you restore the most recent versions of each, without the edit history? --] 00:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sure can. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks! --] 00:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == re:Bishonen == | |||
| Thanks for pointing that out. --] (]) 01:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked 2 == | |||
| Due to your disruption on the RfArb workshop, in particular by making satirical proposals, you have been blocked for disruption. I am recusing from the case. ''']''' (]) 02:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|There is no policy against making satirical proposals. This block will interfere with my ability to participate in an ArbCom case I am a party to.|decline=No, but you should not go out of your way to be disruptive. Making satifical proposals on arbcom cases is disruptive. — ''']''' 02:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| The arbitration case will not be ending in a hurry, secondly, there are limits to what RfArb can be used for. You are deliberately trying to incite an escalation. ''']''' (]) 02:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I didn't bring up Giano. If anyone wants to talk about my interaction with Giano then I will defend myself. --] 02:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Furthermore I have stated many times that I will respond to warnings. A block is unnecessary here, and can be seen as punitive and not preventative. --] 02:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't see any substantive difference between making my point via satire and stating factually that something is my opinion and those asking me not to state it are not interested in whether it is true or not. If this comes up again I will repeat this statement on the RFAR page. --] 02:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Isn't a 48 hour block excessive? --] 03:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't appreciate Geogre, a user I have considerable history with, being able to comment on my evidence page without my being able to reply. --] 11:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Email your response to the ArbCom mailing list. I can't think of it off of the top of my head, but it's at ] somewhere. It will be read in full. // ] 11:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I would like it to be posted, since there is a court of public opinion here that is as important to me as the ArbCom. --] 11:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::If you can't wait two days to post a rebuttal, post it here and I will copy it over. I would like to suggest that you not overreact to Bishonen's evidence re:Giano. Until there is some proposal on the workshop such as "Ideogram is uncivil" citing Giano-related diffs, ''and'' it looks from the arbitrators' comments that they are taking it seriously, then there is no need for you to comment on Giano or even reply to Bishonen. On the other hand, if it does appear that your remarks about Giano are being considered by the arbitrators, then it certainly would be appropriate for you to note remarks by Giano that may be mitigating factors. ] 15:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thank you for your offer to help and your excellent advice. I will think about it. --] 17:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| It's been 48 hours. Why can't I edit? --] 02:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Probably because there was an autoblock in place. I've removed it, try now. ] | ] 02:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC). | |||
| ::Hey thanks Bishonen. I owe you. I'll try to be nice to you for 48 hours ] --] 02:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested posts == | |||
| Hello Thatcher. I would like to post the following under Proposed remedies 5 and 6: | |||
| Gangsta's edit warring is not limited to these articles; he has edit-warred on ] and ] and every other page he has touched. --] 17:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :done. ] 18:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I would like to post the following as reply to Geogre on ] (feel free to advise should you feel the wording needs work): | |||
| There has never been an RFC regarding me. Your eagerness to cite one without checking the facts reflects badly on your credibility. Your description of my actions in a conflict is laughable. In our last interaction, I never addressed you directly until you decided to attack ''me''. I don't start flame wars, I end them. You're mad because I usually end them by making you look like an idiot, but if you would learn your lesson and stop flaming before I get there, this wouldn't happen. There is no support for the claim that I "gather up a group of brand new 'friends'" etc. The other parties from WPCHINA supported me here from the beginning. Don't jump to conclusions about good faith attempts to discuss the issues raised by our interaction with other parties. You didn't think I post only to attract your attention, do you? | |||
| Don't throw these vague allegations on the talk page. If you have supporting diffs, post them. I will be happy to explain my behaviour in each and every case. --] 17:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Without intending to be partisan, may I suggest that there are a couple of words/phrases here that could have the effect of escalating the argument? I think you could make the point about no RFC and uncited allegations without the word "idiot" or directly attacking his "credibility." I would give the same advice to any arbitration participant. I will also post it as is if you are sure about it. ] 18:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you very much. I will think about the phrasing. I think you could be very helpful in keeping me out of trouble. --] 20:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I would like to post the following to ]: | |||
| === Reply to Geogre === | |||
| Geogre's contribution, as he himself admits, contains no evidence. It is personal, unsupported opinion. Geogre doesn't feel the need to prove anything he says. --] 17:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :done. ] 18:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Thatcher, here is my revised post. Hope this is better. --] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :There has never been an RFC regarding me. Don't be so eager to cite one without checking the facts. Your description of my actions in a conflict is pure propaganda. In our last interaction, I never addressed you directly until you decided to attack ''me''. I don't start flame wars, I end them. You're mad because I usually end them by making you look bad, but if you stopped flaming before I get there this wouldn't happen. There is no support for the claim that I "gather up a group of brand new 'friends'" etc. The other parties from WPCHINA supported me here from the beginning. Don't jump to conclusions about good faith attempts to discuss the issues raised by our interaction with other parties. You didn't think I post only to attract your attention, do you? | |||
| :Don't throw these vague allegations on the talk page. If you have supporting diffs, post them. I will be happy to explain my behaviour in each and every case. --] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| '''done''' ] 16:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Oops== | |||
| The whole time I was gathering info and writing the articles (thinking they were very well written) I did not put consideration into the fact that I was using one author (although from several differen volumes), Needham, in editing the articles on ] and ]! Lol. Your objection to both will be addressed shortly when I get a plethora of different sources on the two articles. Thanks for taking the time to look at either of them, though.--] 15:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Alright, I have updated the ] article (with 6 more sources than Needham) and placed it back as a nominee for a Good Article. Hope you like...--] 18:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah, way ahead of you on that one, dude, I'm already a member here: ]. Lol. Take care.--] 01:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == TfD == | |||
| Your TfD has been speedy closed as, well, ''dumb''. Your beef is with navigational templates in general and therefore should be taken to a discussion page for a '''very lengthy debate'' (that is, for at least several weeks, and probably several months), where hundreds upon hundreds of editors will have a chance to chime in. TfD is not the place for that very lengthy discussion. | |||
| If you have a ''specific'' argument against a ''specific'' template (that is, not just the same "I hate navigational templates" argument but directed at one template), please do feel free to list that individual template for deletion (although as a courtesy, please do it one at a time). ] <small>]</small> 18:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Taiwan Province, Republic of China == | |||
| Ideogram, Please understand that the administrative divisions of the Republic of China need to follow the Misplaced Pages Chinese naming conventions. This includes adding the province and the country. Adding (Taiwan) after Republic of China is also not correct. By that, you are equating ROC to Taiwan, which is incorrect even though Taiwan comprises much of the ROC's current jurisdiction. There are still Fujian islands Kinmen and Matsu + some people might think the ROC comprises all of China. I am not doing POV edits, merely following the rules set forth on Misplaced Pages. I did not invent them overnight. ] 20:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Actually, I'm just changing it back to the way it was before another user Jerrypp772000 came around and mass renamed all ROC related articles. And you should really watch some things carefully. Chen Shui-bian is the President of the Republic of China and has always been. He is not prez of Taiwan. I Cannot believe that you reverted that. That is simply astounding. You are being extremely counter productive. I am following precedent of other articles that are similar in content. I think you should not do that and follow the existing consensus and de facto status. ] 20:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are a liar. Very few of the articles you are editing were touched by Jerry. You don't understand how Misplaced Pages works. It is just as easy for people to revert you as it is for you to make your edits. None of your edits will stay unless you can get people to agree with you. --] 21:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You are sad by calling people a liar. Clearly you have no life. and YOU ARE THE LIAR. Please have good faith. Jerrypp772000 touched so many articles and messed up Misplaced Pages. I cant believe you cant even recognize Chen Shui-bian article and keep reverting it. It is a symbol of your ignorance. ] 21:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You won't get anywhere by insulting me. You have to convince the other interested editors, including Jerry, that you are right or they will all revert your edits. --] 21:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't think I'm the one who's messing up Misplaced Pages, at least I am not the one who got blocked for violating the 3RR.--] 13:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Jerry, I don't think there is any point trying to argue with this guy. If he keeps trying to make controversial edits, revert them until he is willing to discuss. --] 14:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I think he is a sock of Nationalist because they have similar editing patterns (like editing without discussing). I had done that (revert their edits) before, and had been blocked 2 times for a total of 32 hrs because of it. I don't think it's worth it.{{unsigned|Jerrypp772000}} | |||
| ::::Just revert him once or twice per article. --] 01:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Sending email via Misplaced Pages? == | |||
| Hi, I'm sorry I'm not sure how to send email via Misplaced Pages, but you could either append to my talk page or send to the email address shown in the user box at the bottom of my user page. Look forward to hearing from you! ] 14:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| ::To Mackensen: You are perfectly free to choose expediency over principle. But if you do so, I do not belong here. --] 02:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| But I'll make it a messy fight first, so don't overestimate how expedient it will be. --] 02:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :No, This is not the place for making ] violations to disrupt. ''']''' (]) 03:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::You cannot do any worse to me than make me leave. --] 03:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Will anyone post my list of evidence regarding Giano for me? --] 03:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:13, 13 January 2024
 | I try to keep conversations threaded. I generally reply to posts here on this page. Usually if I post on your talk page I watchlist you. |
Welcome!
Hello, Ideogram, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Allan McInnes (talk) 22:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello and welcome
Hello Ideogram, Welcome to Misplaced Pages.
Thank you for the very kind message you left for me. It came as a very pleasant and welcome surprise. I think Misplaced Pages has a lot of potential, although it has its detractors, but I'm glad you've decided to make up your own mind about it and the best way to do that is to get involved. In the long run things usually work out well, and there are lot of very capable and dedicated editors here that ensure the integrity of the project is protected as much as possible. (The abilities of the various monkeys here are diverse but the mix seems to work.) Please let me know if there's anything you ever need help with and I look forward to hearing from you. Once again, welcome! Rossrs 00:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Archives
to 17 Jun 2006 | to 21 Jun 2006 | to 26 Jun 2006 | to 07 Sep 2006 | to 17 Nov 2006 | to 07 Feb 2007 | to 08 Mar 2007 | to 23 Apr 2007 | to 10 Jun 2007 | to 8 Aug 2007 | to 16 Jul 2011
Top-importance computer science articles
Hi Ideogram,
You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through Category:Top-importance Computer science articles and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as Compile time) are really as important as Alan Turing or the ubiquitous quicksort, as opposed to simply of high importance (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —Ruud 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Birthright Israel
Hello,
I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. Yaakov Birthright Franklin (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments
Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Chinese calligraphy/Comments during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:People's Republic of China
Portal:People's Republic of China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:People's Republic of China and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:People's Republic of China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 22:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
List of libraries in Taipei listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of libraries in Taipei. Since you had some involvement with the List of libraries in Taipei redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:People's Republic of China
Portal:People's Republic of China, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:People's Republic of China (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:People's Republic of China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Huangjinghai (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Forth (programming language)
Forth (programming language) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)