Misplaced Pages

Talk:Jews: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:04, 27 October 2024 editAndreJustAndre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,574 edits Edit, Jews are not a race or ethnic group: hatTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:08, 2 January 2025 edit undoAndreJustAndre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,574 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 2A02:9130:FE13:A7D1:1816:A825:2852:39E6 (talk) to last revision by Lowercase sigmabot IIITags: Twinkle Undo 
(27 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 59: Line 59:
* RM, Jews → Jewish people, '''Not moved''', 10 October 2017, ] * RM, Jews → Jewish people, '''Not moved''', 10 October 2017, ]
* RM, Jews → Jewish people, '''Not moved''', 29 April 2018, ] * RM, Jews → Jewish people, '''Not moved''', 29 April 2018, ]
}}
{{Press
|author = Len Sander
|title = Bericht: So soll Misplaced Pages von Anti-Israel-Aktivisten unterwandert worden sein (Report: Misplaced Pages allegedly infiltrated by anti-Israel activists)
|trans-title = Report: Misplaced Pages allegedly infiltrated by anti-Israel activists
|date = October 25, 2024
|org = ]
|url = https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/bericht-so-soll-wikipedia-von-anti-israel-aktivisten-unterwandert-worden-sein-li.2265970
|lang =
|quote = Even though most of these changes have been reversed - the English-language version of the article on the subject of Jews, for example, contains the link to the historical Kingdom of Israel - the effect of concerted online campaigns should not be underestimated.
|archiveurl =
|archivedate = <!-- do not wikilink -->
|accessdate = December 5, 2024
|author2 = Debbie Weiss
|title2 = Misplaced Pages’s Quiet Revolution: How a Coordinated Group of Editors Reshaped the Israeli-Palestinian Narrative
|date2 = December 4, 2024
|org2 = ]
|url2 = https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/12/04/wikipedias-quiet-revolution-how-coordinated-group-editors-reshaped-israeli-palestinian-narrative/
|lang2 =
|quote2 = In an article on “Jews,” for example, an editor removed the phrase “Land of Israel” from a key sentence on the origin of Jewish people. The article’s short description (that appears on search results) was changed from “Ethnoreligious group and nation from the Levant” to “Ethnoreligious group and cultural community.”
|archiveurl2 =
|archivedate2 = <!-- do not wikilink -->
|accessdate2 = December 5, 2024
}} }}
{{archives|]|nobot=yes}} {{archives|]|nobot=yes}}


== Edit, Jews are not a race or ethnic group == == Non-White Jews ==
<s>We all know full well there are such things as Arab Jews. Why is there no data on all the Moroccon Jews? They all exist. But we only recognise the Ashkenazi Jews (Modern Israel Jews)</s> Issue resolved ] (]) 00:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{hat}}
Edit, Jews are not a race or an ethnic group


:Not sure what you mean. We have several articles on ] and ], ], and so on. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 03:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
"A reevaluation of the anthropological genetics literature on Jewish populations reveals them not
::@]
simply to be a body of genetically related people descending from a small group of common
::Ik, but shouldn't it be part of the bigger article on the Jews? ] (]) 03:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
ancestors, but rather a “mosaic” of peoples of diverse origins. Greek and other pre-medieval
:::Sure, of course, ''Mizrahim'' occurs at least 7 times on this page, North Africa at least 20 times ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 03:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
historiographic sources suggest the patterning evident in recent genetic studies could be
:Moroccan Jews are mentioned in five places in the article. In addition, there's a section titled "]". So it isn't clear what your concern is. ] (]) 13:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
explained by a major contribution from Greco-Roman and Anatolian-Byzantine converts who
::@] oh ok nvm ] (]) 13:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
affiliated themselves with some iteration of Judaism beginning in the first and second
centuries ce and continuing into the Middle Ages. These populations, along with Babylonian and
Alexandrian Jewish communities, indigenous North Africans, and Slavic-speaking converts to
Judaism, support a mosaic geography of Jewish ancestry in Europe and Western Asia, rather
than one arising from a limited set of lineages originating solely in Palestine."


== Not the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity (See: ]) ==
See


Name and etymology: "After the Exile, the term ''Yehudi'' (Jew) was used for all followers of Judaism because the survivors of the Exile (who were the former residents of the Kingdom of Judah) were the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity as the ] from the ] had ] and assimilated into other populations."
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/702709?journalCode=jar


This claim is not totally true and misleading. ] are crying in the corner. ] (]) 08:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
The Geography of Jewish Ethnogenesis.pdf


== What’s with the glazing in the last paragraph? ==


“Jews wrote the Bible, founded Christianity, and had an indirect but profound influence on Islam.”
Also there is no Jüdische Typus


Not only does this sentence contain somewhat misleading (or at least incomplete) phrasing for the first two parts, but the language itself seems to be leaning towards ]. The preceding sentence is sufficient.
"It has been argued that Jews are not genomically distinct from non-Jews."


Lmk if I’m totally off base here, this is just my perception ] (]) 07:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Eran Elhaik, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2016.00141/full In Search of the jüdische Typus: A Proposed Benchmark to Test the Genetic Basis of Jewishness Challenges Notions of “Jewish Biomarkers, Frontiers of Genetics Vol.7, 5 August 2016: ‘Claims that Jews can be accurately distinguished from non-Jews . . and carry “Jewish heritage” in their DNA . . are . .frequently made. Supporters of the alternative school have consistently dismissed any racial notion of Jews over the past centuries, citing the ongoing failures to provide a robust test for Jewishness and the rich historical, archeological, and linguistic evidence for Jews’ history of assimilations and mixtures with non-Jewish populations rather than seclusion periods. This position can be summarized as: “A Jew is a Jew because he chose to be a Jew and not because he was forced – because of biology or by some external social force – to define himself as a Jew”.’


:Seems fine to me, literally true statements, no puffery detected. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 07:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/Genetic_studies_of_Jews
::Alright, perhaps I was mistaken. I still think it might be beneficial to reword it in a way that doesn’t oversimplify things as much. ] (]) 11:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

:::How would you want to reword it? ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 22:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
] (]) 01:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
::::"Jews authored the Bible, established Christianity, and influenced Islam." <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>🍁 01:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

:::::Seems fine to me. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 01:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{not done}}. Although there's a correlation, neither "race" nor "ethnic group" typically refer to populations which are exclusively bounded by genetics. See our articles on ] and ]. ] (]) 02:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
::::: The first two clauses seems mostly a substitution of longer words for shorter ones, with no apparent change in meaning or other improvement I can see. As far as the last clause, given that Islam is one of the three ], and the many links mentioned in the lead paragraph of ], the word ''profound'' seems an accurate description, and not puffery.
:That's not exactly the case. European Jews are all practically the same genetic group,but Ashkenazim do have a percentage of at least 20% Slavic+Germanic which makes them a bit different from Italkim, Sephardim, and Romaniotes, but other than that they're mostly all southern European and Levantine. They also cluster quite close to Mizrahim such as Iraqi Jews from what I've read, but when it comes to Yemenites and Ethiopians, then it becomes a bit confusing.
::::: To the IP: a short, assertive statement in the ] is not an oversimplification, if it is a summary of content in the body of the article that demonstrates that the lead statement is correct and lays out the most important points without all the details excected in the body. Not everything can be crammed into the lead; remember that ] is just a summary of the most important points of the body, and that sentence seems fine for the lead. {{ec}} ] (]) 01:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
:In the end though, ethnicities aren't really defined by genetics in the first place,so it's mostly culture and religion. ] (]) 17:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Agree with Mathglot. ] (]) 02:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
:We are an in fact an ethnic group. Stop trying to erase our history. Enough.
:The argument presented here seems to cherry-pick findings from genetic studies to push an agenda that diminishes the validity of Jewish ethnicity. By focusing solely on genetic diversity within Jewish populations, it disregards the broader context of Jewish identity, which encompasses a rich tapestry of ], ], and ].
:Reducing Jewishness to a mere collection of genetic markers overlooks the lived experiences and shared history that have shaped Jewish communities for centuries. It perpetuates a reductionist view that undermines the complexity of Jewish identity and ignores the cultural, religious, and historical factors that bind Jewish people together.
:Moreover, the dismissal of the concept of a "Jewish Typus" and the assertion that Jews are not "genomically distinct" from non-Jews without acknowledging the broader context of Jewish history and identity is deeply troubling. It not only overlooks the resilience of Jewish communities in maintaining their distinctiveness throughout history but also echoes ] that seeks to delegitimize Jewish identity.
:This argument not only fails to provide a comprehensive understanding of Jewish ethnicity but also risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes and biases against Jewish people. It's important to approach discussions about Jewish identity with nuance and sensitivity, recognizing the multifaceted nature of Jewishness beyond genetic markers.
:In addition, I must point out what I feel is utmost hypocrisy.
:1. '''Selective Application of Identity''': People who argue that Jews are solely a religious group often ignore the fact that Jewish identity is not simply religion, in fact the religion itself centers around the ethnic and tribal identity of the jewish people, the practices itself center around the Land of Israel, that is what it is. One example is the ], plus the ], etc.
:2.'''Ignoring Historical Prejudice''': Historically, Jews have faced discrimination and persecution based on their ethnicity, regardless of their religious beliefs. Anti-Semitic rhetoric often targets Jews as a racial or ethnic group, regardless of whether they practice Judaism. Denying the ethnic dimension of Jewish identity while perpetuating stereotypes and prejudice against Jews as a group is contradictory.
:Disregarding Self-Identification: Many Jews identify strongly with their ethnic or cultural heritage, even if they are not religiously observant. Dismissing Jewish identity as purely religious disregards the self-identification and lived experiences of Jewish individuals and communities who see themselves as part of a broader ethnic or cultural group.
:3.'''Double Standards''': Those who claim Jews are only a religious group may fail to apply the same logic to other religious communities. For example, they may acknowledge the ethnic or cultural aspects of other religious groups, such as Muslims or Hindus, while denying the same complexity to Jews. This double standard reveals a bias against Jews and undermines the consistent application of principles of identity and diversity in ].
:The other thing I notice is the ] of you attempting to deny the racial or ethnic dimension of Jewish identity in order to justify speaking about Jews as a unified group, ]. ] (]) 15:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
::Can't see a single source in all that wall of opinion text. Only ones I can see are by OP. ] (]) 15:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{reply to|Yamnaya|Selfstudier}} Note that before the first reply to this request the OP was blocked as one of the many recent socks of ]. ] was just protected for 6 months because of this editor and similarly themed edits. I suggest that we collapse this thread. ] (]) 18:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Sock or not, I would still like to see a proper response to the points made. With sources. I understand that Elhaik might be somewhat controversial, so if we had a couple sources saying that research is fringe or at least not mainstream, that might do. Idk anything about the first one but same idea. OR should the discussion be at the genetics article? ] (]) 18:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Now I see that there is a collapsed thread there in the genetics article that I think maybe should not actually be collapsed. ] (]) 18:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::Yep, I will take my concerns there, so can go ahead and collapse this one here. ] (]) 18:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
::::I promise I am not that person, Nor am I a sockpuppet. This is an IP address, and a densely populated neighborhood. ] (]) 20:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Thats why its my opinion. With all due respect I have never used this site before in this manner, but I found the comment I was responding to, to be incredibly offensive and bordering on antisemtism. Perhaps my bias is apparent and I can recuse myself if you'd like. ] (]) 20:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:Eran's work along with the Khazar theory had largely been debunked. Good try though. ] (]) 00:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
:{{tq|"It has been argued that Jews are not genomically distinct from non-Jews."}}
:# "It has been argued that" is far from conclusive information.
:# My genetic test assessed my genetic makeup as somewhere between 96% and 98% Ashkenazi Jewish, consistent with my emergence from four Ashkenazi grandparents. They must have some idea of what, at least, distinguishes Ashkenazi genetics to have been able to classify me as that and not, say, Slavic or German, don't you think? I know that's ] but I think it, along with my first point, reasonably suggests to me that you might be cherry-picking and grasping.
:] (]) 00:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
{{hab}}

== Edit request ==

{{editprotected|ans=y}}

Please add a hatnote to handle the incoming redirects {{noredirect|Juden}}, {{noredirect|Juifs}}, {{noredirect|Juives}}.

Please add:

{{tlx|redirect-multi|3|Juden|Juifs|Juives|other uses|Juive|and|Juif|and|Jude|and|Juden (disambiguation)}}

{{redirect-multi|3|Juden|Juifs|Juives|other uses|Juive|and|Juif|and|Jude|and|Juden (disambiguation)}}

-- ] (]) 15:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}} ] (]) 05:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 July 2024 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Jews|answered=yes}}
Please change "After the Exile, the term Yehudi (Jew) was used for all followers of Judaism because the survivors of the Exile (who were the former residents of the Kingdom of Judah) were the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity as the ten tribes from the northern Kingdom of Israel had been scattered and assimilated into other populations."
to
" After the Exile, the term Yehudi (Jew) was used for all followers of Judaism, because the survivors of the Exile (who were the former residents of the Kingdom of Judah) were the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity as religious jews; the ten tribes from the northern Kingdom of Israel had been scattered and assimilated into other populations." ] (]) 12:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 00:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
::I am not the original author, but it seems that the intent of the proposed change would just fix unclear writing, not add/remove any factual information. ] (]) 19:27, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
:::I understand what you mean about clarifying, where it reads "had kept their distinct identity", their distinct identify ''as what''. But do we know that they were all "religious"? Or do we know only that they continued to identify themselves, distinctly, as Jews, in contrast with the descendants of the other tribes? ] (]) 12:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

== Non-White Jews ==

We all know full well there are such things as Arab Jews. Why is there no data on all the Moroccon Jews? They all exist. But we only recognise the Ashkenazi Jews (Modern Israel Jews) ] (]) 00:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

:Not sure what you mean. We have several articles on ] and ], ], and so on. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 03:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:08, 2 January 2025

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jews article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Judaism or Jewish people. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Judaism or Jewish people at the Reference desk.
Former good articleJews was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 23, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 6, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
October 6, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 26, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
April 18, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconEthnic groups Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

WikiProject iconIsrael Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconJudaism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJewish history Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWestern Asia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

  • RM, Jew → Jewish people, No consensus, 10 July 2007, Discussion
  • RM, Jew → Jews, Moved, 17 January 2010, Discussion
  • RM, Jews → Jewish people, Not moved, 10 October 2017, Discussion
  • RM, Jews → Jewish people, Not moved, 29 April 2018, Discussion
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
Archiving icon
Archives

Talk:Jews/infobox



This page has archives.

Non-White Jews

We all know full well there are such things as Arab Jews. Why is there no data on all the Moroccon Jews? They all exist. But we only recognise the Ashkenazi Jews (Modern Israel Jews) Issue resolved MjhdNfl (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean. We have several articles on Mizrahi Jews and Arab Jews, History of the Jews in Morocco, and so on. Andre🚐 03:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
@Andrevan
Ik, but shouldn't it be part of the bigger article on the Jews? MjhdNfl (talk) 03:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Sure, of course, Mizrahim occurs at least 7 times on this page, North Africa at least 20 times Andre🚐 03:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Moroccan Jews are mentioned in five places in the article. In addition, there's a section titled "Ethnic divisions". So it isn't clear what your concern is. Largoplazo (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
@Largoplazo oh ok nvm MjhdNfl (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Not the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity (See: Samaritans)

Name and etymology: "After the Exile, the term Yehudi (Jew) was used for all followers of Judaism because the survivors of the Exile (who were the former residents of the Kingdom of Judah) were the only Israelites that had kept their distinct identity as the ten tribes from the northern Kingdom of Israel had been scattered and assimilated into other populations."

This claim is not totally true and misleading. Samaritans are crying in the corner. Theofunny (talk) 08:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

What’s with the glazing in the last paragraph?

“Jews wrote the Bible, founded Christianity, and had an indirect but profound influence on Islam.”

Not only does this sentence contain somewhat misleading (or at least incomplete) phrasing for the first two parts, but the language itself seems to be leaning towards glazing. The preceding sentence is sufficient.

Lmk if I’m totally off base here, this is just my perception 65.112.8.31 (talk) 07:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Seems fine to me, literally true statements, no puffery detected. Andre🚐 07:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Alright, perhaps I was mistaken. I still think it might be beneficial to reword it in a way that doesn’t oversimplify things as much. 65.112.8.31 (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
How would you want to reword it? Andre🚐 22:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
"Jews authored the Bible, established Christianity, and influenced Islam." Moxy🍁 01:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Seems fine to me. Andre🚐 01:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
The first two clauses seems mostly a substitution of longer words for shorter ones, with no apparent change in meaning or other improvement I can see. As far as the last clause, given that Islam is one of the three Abrahamic religions, and the many links mentioned in the lead paragraph of Judaism and Islam, the word profound seems an accurate description, and not puffery.
To the IP: a short, assertive statement in the WP:LEAD is not an oversimplification, if it is a summary of content in the body of the article that demonstrates that the lead statement is correct and lays out the most important points without all the details excected in the body. Not everything can be crammed into the lead; remember that WP:LEAD is just a summary of the most important points of the body, and that sentence seems fine for the lead. (edit conflict) Mathglot (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Agree with Mathglot. Carlstak (talk) 02:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: