| Revision as of 20:02, 28 October 2024 view sourceAndreJustAndre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,600 edits →accusations: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:09, 1 January 2025 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,381 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Nableezy/Archive 58) (bot | ||
| (110 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Action requested on Alison Weir page == | |||
| ==Notice of noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:AN-notice--> ] (]) 08:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Nableezy, if you are a "Confirmed-extended" editor as I assume, would you be kind enough to take a look at my requested edit of a paragraph in the protected-extended entry "Alison Weir" and take action on it? It just sits there...thanks.... kenfree ] (]) 02:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Shiny thingy for you == | |||
| == advice for article creation == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A cut but still vigorous watermelon''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For defending UNGA resolution 37/43 | |||
| hi i’d love to speak to you about creating an article please. it’s on a controversial conflict so this is why i’d like to get it right. thanks ] (]) 17:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Administrator Noticeboard Notice (October 2024) == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice-->'''The ]''' (] 04:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *Just a note, I am not accusing you of anything. The AN/I notice is that a media article has accused you of violating Misplaced Pages guidelines, and this media article was mentioned at AN/I. '''The ]''' (] 04:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *:Cool? ''']''' - 04:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:AN-notice--> <span style="white-space: nowrap;">—] <sup>(]·])</sup></span> 17:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == accusations == | |||
| Your repeated accusations of tendentious, disruptive, and gaming are incivil. A veteran editor should know that "the wrong version" is not gaming, it's standard rules of engagement. I started an RFC at the behest of the admin you summoned who confirmed my interpretation was reasonable. Please desist in your ]. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 19:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :They are only aspersions if they are unsupported by evidence. I cited the evidence. The admin actually said "in this circumstance there is clearly no consensus to include at this time". Yes, you are gaming, yes it is disruptive. Anything else? ''']''' - 19:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, the admin said, "start an RFC." Are you not aware of the long-time Misplaced Pages norm and procedure that an RFC means the status quo remains? ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 19:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Literally anybody can ] that he said {{tq|That said, in this circumstance there is clearly no consensus to include at this time. Someone should just start an rfc about the sentence in the lede of this article.}} If you are going to distort the record even now there really is nothing to speak to you about. Kindly take your leave from this page. Thank you. ''']''' - 19:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::@], were you telling me that if I started an RFC after Snowstormofgorion had already reverted (which I didn't intentionally time), I was being disruptive and gaming the system? Am I distorting the record? Or is Nableezy being incivil and casting aspersions without evidence? ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 20:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:09, 1 January 2025
Action requested on Alison Weir page
Nableezy, if you are a "Confirmed-extended" editor as I assume, would you be kind enough to take a look at my requested edit of a paragraph in the protected-extended entry "Alison Weir" and take action on it? It just sits there...thanks.... kenfree Kenfree (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
advice for article creation
hi i’d love to speak to you about creating an article please. it’s on a controversial conflict so this is why i’d like to get it right. thanks Eatlandlords (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)