Revision as of 16:44, 29 October 2024 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits OneClickArchived "Administrator Elections: Discussion phase" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits OneClickArchived "Is this an adequate source?" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53 | ||
(56 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | ||
== |
== Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance == | ||
*{{userlinks|Emiya1980}} | |||
*{{pagelinks|Leonid Brezhnev}} | |||
*{{pagelinks|Loomis Havemeyer}} | |||
I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for ]. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. ] (]) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
This message comes to inform you that I slipped up with regards to the topic ban. During the course of visiting the ] page, I noticed there was no date for the lede image and then (as a matter of habit) edited the infobox to reflect that the photo depicted Tikhonov in 1985. Almost immediately afterward, it occurred to me that such an edit was in violation of the topic ban and I promptly reverted said edit. You'll find that the timestamp of such edits reflects this. | |||
Everything I have just said to you is 100% true and is not intended to justify a calculated attempt to bypass the topic ban that was recently opposed. | |||
If possible, please cut me a break regarding this mistake on my part in this one instance. ] (]) 02:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
*{{tps}} The problems with this user are certainly broader compared to this lenient sanction. One needs to simply take a look at ] article for understanding that. ] (]) 03:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::], thanks for your note. I won't be taking any action on your slip-up myself. ] (]) 03:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::: is also really pushing at the edge of the topic ban, since in an article with an infobox, the addition of an image is going to ''be'' to that infobox. ] (]) 18:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Does in ] violate my topic ban?] (]) 02:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{-}} | |||
::No, you should be able to contribute at ] so long as you stay away from mentioning the infobox. I notice that you just self-reverted your change to the first sentence of the article. That seems wise. Not because of your topic ban but because such a change would be a magnet for edit wars. ] (]) 03:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} | |||
--] (]) 06:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
Hello, | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
] | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
== Administrator Elections: Voting phase == | |||
<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; padding:10px 15px"> | |||
<div style="padding: 0 0 0.5em; vertical-align: middle; font-size:130%"> '''] | <span style="font-size:85%">Voting phase</span>''' | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"> | |||
<div> | |||
The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at ]. | |||
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is: | |||
*October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase | |||
*November 1–? - Scrutineering phase | |||
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone ] will have a week to use the ] software to vote, which uses a ]. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The ] are different from those at RFA. | |||
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the ]. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no ] ("crat chats"). | |||
Any questions or issues can be asked on the ]. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing. | |||
</div> | |||
<div>]</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"> | |||
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please ].</div> | |||
</div> | |||
] (]) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Robertsky@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrator_elections/Newsletter_list&oldid=1253182481 --> | |||
== Query about outcome of edit warring report == | |||
Hello, Thank you for looking into the report I made about user 'Zombie girl509' reverting an edit made to Melissa McBride's Misplaced Pages page. | |||
Please can I ask why I am receiving a warning? I cited reliable sources to prove that the information I edited is accurate, and I provided explanations for this edit. Zombie girl509 has been reverting this with no explanation as to why, even after I reached out to communicate about it. I have been trying to provide accurate information while it seems to me that Zombie girl509 has been reverting this with malicious intent. I reached out on Zombie girl509's 'Talk' page and I posted on the article talk page about the edit, but I received no response. If there's something else I should have done, please let me know. ] (]) 16:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance
I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for Hideki Tojo. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)