Misplaced Pages

User talk:Amigao: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 15 November 2024 editAmigao (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users72,218 edits Removing unsourced informationTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:53, 10 January 2025 edit undoTop5a (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers905 editsm S with CCsTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(40 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:




== Removing unsourced information ==
== Please desist from edit-warring and from reverting edits ==


Please refrain from ] that otherwise contributes to the quality of an article without discussion. Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as {{Citation needed}}. In addition, please engage with the cited sources before taking action, as text that might seem unsourced at first glance may be confirmed by a citation further down in the section. Thank you. ] (]) 14:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Please desist from reverting edits and edit-warring, especially on the anti-Chinese sentiment page, by removing important neutral and highly relevant information that has been stated concisely and which is amply supported by academic citations. ] (]) 16:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)


:You might consider reviewing ] and also ] first. ] (]) 19:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC) :Please keep in mind that ] is hard ] on Misplaced Pages. One is always free to restore unsourced text with a ]. - ] (]) 15:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
::I am aware of this. However, I am voicing this request because (a) requesting citations, rather than deleting text, makes the work of other Wikipedians easier, (b) immediate deletion may result in actually sourced text being deleted (as described in the initial message, and as has been the case in the ] article), and (c) text deletion may result in otherwise valuable and factual information being omitted despite a reliable source being available (but uncited), as not all contributors check the edit history of every page for instances of unsourced text removal that can be restored. See also ]. ] (]) 15:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
:<s>I'm having the same problem with @]. I will look, but apparently, he is making round-the-clock changes with a particular objective. He has made almost 50 changes to random articles on China in the past 12 hours alone. {{strikethrough|Either this is a shared account or a bot.}} ] (])</s> 19:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
:::How would a reader even know that a statement is factual if there is no ] there to back it up? That puts an undue burden on the reader to research unsourced text if they wish to confirm its veracity, which is an unrealistic expectation in most cases. How would they know that it is not ]? Also, please see ]. - ] (]) 15:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
::This account is a highly productive editor and have seen no indication he is a bot or shared account. Please provide evidence in link form before making these accusations, otherwise please strike through your comments. ] (]) 17:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
::::My point regarding (c) does not relate to the reader, but rather to future editors and article quality. Unsourced text deletion lowers the likelihood of ] being added to the article when compared to the use of a <nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki> template, as it effectively hides the need for additional citations in the edit history. A <nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki> eliminates the burden on the reader you mention while also avoiding the issues of (a) and (b). Once again, please see ]. To illustrate my position: my work on ] would have been easier if you had used <nowiki>{{Citation needed}}</nowiki> instead, and if I had not been invested enough to monitor the article's history after my initial edits, it would be unlikely that an outside editor would have noticed the multiple instances of removal and provided the needed sources. ] (]) 16:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
:::<s>I'm going about working with Wiki incorrectly, so I will step back from editing to see how I can better engage with this community. The vast majority of editors in this community are trying to do the right thing; I have just had the same experience as the initiator of this thread. I should have adequately considered the number of issues (state actors, corporate employees trying to advertise, etc.) that WIki deals with daily.</s>
:::::You can also consider using a sandbox to write drafts if you do not yet have the sources to support the text. It is hard for editors to know when someone makes an edit and intends to add the source later and when they do not. ] (]) 17:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
:::<s>My assertion comes from looking at his usage logs from the user where (for example) on October 25th, he made 11 edits to 11 separate users' talk pages within a 4-minute timeframe. (10/15/24 2:21-2:24). There are many examples where edits are made simultaneously on different pages to different articles. Making substantive additions to multiple articles with matching time stamps looks odd. I can produce other examples. Here is an example where there are 9 edits in 2 minutes.</s>
::::::You seem to have misunderstood the issue. That is not at all the case that is being discussed here. Every one of my edits has been accompanied with citations. ] (]) 17:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +13  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: Mainland China → mainland China '''current''' ] ]: ]
:::::::A tag for 'citations needed' is a ''temporary'' fix but one that seldom leads to the tagged text getting a ] in practice. There are some good past discussions about this very issue in the talk archives of ] and ] that I recommend. - ] (]) 21:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +1  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> ]: clean up, ]: March 27, 2006 → March 27, 2006, '''current''' ] ]: ]
::::::::Deletion, on the other hand, ''almost never'' (this case being an exceedingly rare exception) leads to the text getting a ], by virtue of the would-have-been-tagged text simply no longer existing in the article body. Why not choose ''seldom'' making the article better over ''almost never'' doing so?
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +18  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: Chairman → chairman '''current''' ] ]: ]
::::::::You have still not addressed (a) or (b).
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +1  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> ]: clean up, ]: inteference → interference ] ]: ]
::::::::Could you please link to those discussions? There are 81 archive pages on ] alone and I do not find it reasonable to expect a user to read through all of them in search of a discussion concerning a specific topic. ] (]) 21:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +23  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: Furthermore → Furthermore, '''current''' ] ]: ]
:::::::::It's obvious he has a bias and interest in being Pro-American, Pro-Israel and Pro-Disruption in his edits. This account might be under the control of a government mass psyops program, he also removed my edit regarding Global Times and changed it back to being objective. We should report this account. Preaching of "state actors" in his user page while doing actions of similar caliber is crazy. ] (]) 10:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +3  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: from 15–18 → from 15 to 18, two year → two-year] ]: ]
:::Also, thank you for adding ] to ]. This is a good instance of how this process leads to an all-around stronger article. - ] (]) 16:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
:::** <bdi></bdi>  +1  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> ]: clean up, ]: September 15, 1989 → September 15, 1989, '''current''' ] ]: ]
:::** <bdi></bdi>  0  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: New Year's day → New Year's Day '''current''' ] ]: ]
:::** <bdi></bdi>  −6  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: May 1, 2024 → May 1, 2024, (2), ’s → 's (2)'''current''' ] ]: ]
:::** <bdi></bdi>  −1  <abbr>m</abbr> <bdi>]</bdi> clean up, ]: ’s → 's '''current''' ] ]: ]
:::<s>I will strike the comment does not find this suspicious. ] (])</s> 05:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
::::These are all tiny edits that take maybe 10 seconds each so I do not find these suspicious. If they were big edits, then yes, that would be suspicious ] (]) 22:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::<s>Thanks for your response. I will be the first to admit that as I've investigated this further, I've gotten even more confused. This is why I'm taking a break from editing until I better understand how things work. I do think many of the edits are rather substantive.</s>
:::::<s>Thousands of edits are made under this account using the IA Bot interface, so my assertion that this account uses bots seems true. However, the bots are mainly utilized not for nefarious purposes but to correct citations, etc. WP:AGF.</s>
:::::<s>I will strike that comment based on your representation. ] (])</s> 03:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)


== September 2024 == == TNT and Synth ==


I don't call for TNT lightly - the references in that article are so entangled and use so much ] that blowing up and starting over really does seem like the correct call. Please review my detailed notes - I put them at article talk because, regardless of whether my AfD succeeds, these ''serious'' deficiencies in citation need to be addressed. ] (]) 16:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
] Before adding a category to an article, as you did to ], please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Misplaced Pages's ]. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's ] content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. ''Please don't stealth revert changes like you did with . This page was purged as part of a CFD that {{ping|HouseBlaster}} just closed.'' <!-- Template:uw-badcat --> ] (]) 20:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)


:It's quite obvious he has a bias and interest in being Pro-American, Pro-Israel and Pro-Foreign Interest in his edits. This account might be under the control of a government psyops effort, he also removed my edit regarding Global Times and changed it back to being heavily biased after I corrected his wording. We should seriously consider reporting this account. Preaching of "state actors" in his user page while engaging in the same behaviour is crazy. ] (]) 14:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
== Advice request ==
::Actually, while we don't always agree, I have a fair bit of respect for Amigao, who I think comports themselves appropriately on WP far better than average, which is why I came here and explained to them why I was attempting something unusual. Please don't try to involve me in your personal conflict. ] (]) 20:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)


== PressTV as source of Iranian designation ==
Hi @], I saw your userpage and thought you might be able to offer some advice in case you have been in my situation previously. I have come across an editor that I am upwards of 80% sure is an undisclosed operative on behalf of a foreign government, and am wondering whether you had any advice on how to proceed. ] (]) 03:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)


I saw you removed my edit on Iran considering the HTS as terror org due to the PressTV source. How would this not fall under the exception. It's a state-media source being used to determine how the Iranian state considers the HTS (a terror group or otherwise). It's not being used as a source for facts on an event. ] (]) 00:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
:For starters, get as many eyes on the relevant article(s) as possible. Is there one article in particular where your suspicions are acute? - ] (]) 13:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
::] is the main one, but the editor largely follows talking points of US adversaries on topics like immigration, etc. and editing pattern/interests give off hints of a possible Russian operative while (mostly) staying within the rules of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 17:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)


:It's obvious he has a bias and interest in being Pro-American, Pro-Israel and Pro-Disruption in his edits. This account might be under the control of a government mass psyops program, he also removed my edit regarding Global Times and changed it back to Objectivism. We should report this account. Preaching of "state actors" in his user page while doing actions of similar caliber is crazy. ] (]) 10:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
== How should I use depreciated sources? ==


== GA for Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications ==
Hi, I was the one who added the RT and Sputnik links to the ] article. Ironically I was citing them specifically because of their clear state bias and unreliability, as the fact that Sprey would interview with such organizations (multiple times) is the notable fact I was wanting to include.


Thought I should let you know that I plan to nominate the article ] for GA. I am the third highest editor behind you and another so it felt right to let you know. If you had any interested in jumping in as a co-nom that would be wonderful but otherwise thank you for the work you've already put into the page. <b>] ] ]</b> 20:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)


== Trying to kick XLinkBot ==
In that case what's the appropriate way editors should treat such links? Should I have included that "depreciated inline" that you added? Because that makes it seem like the source should be changed when... well it feels a bit convoluted to cite something other than the interview to source said interview existing. ] (]) 04:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)


:Deprecated sources can only be used in ] situations, which this seems to satisfy. - ] (]) 14:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC) Are your two requests at ] from a few months ago still worth pursuing? ] (]) 22:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
::Ok sounds good. Though does that mean the "depreciated inline" tag should be removed because the source is being used appropriately, or left to signify that the source is generally bad even if useful here? ] (]) 00:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
:::It's still a useful tag. The source remains deprecated even though it can be argued that ] applies. - ] (]) 15:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC)


:Hi, {{u|DMacks}}. Yes, they are. Thanks. - ] (]) 18:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I figure instead of starting a new topic I can tack onto this one -- I've reverted your edit on this exact basis -- the source was being used in an ] situation, not for the veracity of the information contained therein. Specifically, a link to a Global Times editorial can be used as a reference for the claim that the Global Times published said editorial. ]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 21:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)


== Yang Youlin - Questionable Edits ==
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].


Hello. I come inquiring about the article on Mr. Yang Youlin and your edits in relation to his article. I would like to state that your deletion of the Legacy section seems a bit biased. The Legacy section was added to provide the readers with information as to how he is memoralized in China, not exactly to propogate Communist ideals. The deletion of the section seems somewhat biased, considering that it did contain some quotes which did harbor communist sentiment. The information is meant to convey how he is memoralized, not to tell the reader how to feel about their death.
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]] <small><sup>Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!</sup></small> 05:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)


== Disinfo ==


If there is any justifiable defense against your actions, I'd like to hear it. ] (]) 01:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
I didn't know of disinfo until I saw your comment. Help me navigate that website please. How is disinformation? The WaPo article cited says "{{tq|The evidence shows that Israel has carried out its war in Gaza at a pace and level of devastation that likely exceeds any recent conflict, destroying more buildings, in far less time, than were destroyed during the Syrian regime’s battle for Aleppo from 2013 to 2016 and the U.S.-led campaign to defeat the Islamic State in Mosul, Iraq, and Raqqa, Syria, in 2017.}}" ''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 01:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)


:] typically has the relevant outlets/links to the actual disinfo (or screenshots of them) on the left and a Summary/Response section that explains what and how is being distorted, falsified, etc. - ] (]) 02:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC) :The text requires ] to back it up, which it did not have. Nothing wrong with a 'Legacy' section per se, but it must be backed up with ]. - ] (]) 01:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
::Reliable sources, yes I understand that. Working on that right now; if you looked at the previous version I added, I did put a few more sources. If you wish, you can search through the Hubei Provincial Archives yourself for more info. ] (]) 01:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
::Yes I see that and can you explain to me how exactly is the above link a distortion or falsification? ''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 02:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
:::What is untrue is the Telegram link/screenshot to the left of the page that distorts the underlying WaPo article. The issue was not with the WaPo article per se. That is what the EUvDisinfo page is explaining. - ] (]) 14:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC) :::] is also a great resource for citing. - ] (]) 01:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)


== I really don't know what to make out of it ==
== Removing unsourced information ==


See this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Peter_Schechter&oldid=1264739643 ]<sup>(])</sup> 07:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from ] that otherwise contributes to the quality of an article without discussion. Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as {{Citation needed}}. In addition, please engage with the cited sources before taking action, as text that might seem unsourced at first glance may be confirmed by a citation further down in the section. Thank you. ] (]) 14:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)


:Please keep in mind that ] is hard ] on Misplaced Pages. One is always free to restore unsourced text with a ]. - ] (]) 15:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC) :Definitely not a ]. - ] (]) 16:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

::I am aware of this. However, I am voicing this request because (a) requesting citations, rather than deleting text, makes the work of other Wikipedians easier, (b) immediate deletion may result in actually sourced text being deleted (as described in the initial message, and as has been the case in the ] article), and (c) text deletion may result in otherwise valuable and factual information being omitted despite a reliable source being available (but uncited), as not all contributors check the edit history of every page for instances of unsourced text removal that can be restored. See also ]. ] (]) 15:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
== Greetings of the season ==
<div class="center" style="background:darkgreen;border:no;padding:0.2em 0em;{{round corners}}"><br />] <span style="color:white;">~ ~ ~ Greetings of the season ~ ~ ~</span>{{pb}}

''<span style="color:lightyellow;">'''Hello Amigao:''' Enjoy the ''']'''&#32;and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, <span style="color:OliveDrab;><small>Spread the love; use {{]:]}} to send this message.</small></span> {{pb}}{{highlight|--] (]) 11:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)|OliveDrab}}</span>''</div>

== Happy New Year, Amigao! ==
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
]]
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}}
'''Amigao''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
<br />] (]) 15:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks -->

==Disambiguation link notification for January 4 ==

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].

(].) --] (]) 08:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

== Repeated removals of unreliably-sourced information ==

Please refrain from outright deleting unreliably-sourced text that otherwise contributes to the quality of an article without discussion. Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as . In addition, please engage with the cited sources before taking action, as text that might seem unsourced at first glance may be confirmed by a citation further down in the section. Thank you. ] (]) 13:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:{{tq|1=Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as }}<br>No, it's the editor insisting on the content is the one who should find the reliable source.{{pb}}Also, why you claim the removals are "repeated"? ] (]) 13:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:You might want to also review ] and ]. - ] (]) 15:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

== Restore My Profile ==

Hello Amigao, I'm very confused as to why my profile was deleted, and specifically regarding the 'sustained notability' issue.

Note... aside from being a globally respected dancer and entertainer for nearly 40 years, as well as a globally acknowledged and respected life coach, I've also appeared in many major media outlets including The New York Times, The Huffington Post, Access Hollywood, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune and TV Guide, been nominated for a GLADD award, as well as me getting a special acknowledgment from the former mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel with "Feb 5, 2017 to be Carlton Wilborn Day In Chicago in recognition of his extraordinary life and enduring efforts that impact culture inform community and inspire change", to name a few.

I believe the issue showed up because I went in last month to update some things, and maybe I did it incorrectly. For sure it was not my intention to go against the rules of Misplaced Pages.
My Sincere Apology!

Please know that everything I had on my profile was 100% legit!

Any support you can generate to expedite the process of reinstating my profile would be greatly appreciated!

Thank You in advance!
Carlton ] (]) 12:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

:Would recommend that you start with ]. - ] (]) 03:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

== S with CCs ==

Hey! I don't know what happened, FYI I didn't revert your changes intentionally, must have misclicked it when I was reviewing some changelogs. Sorry about that, and Happy New Year! ] (]) 19:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:53, 10 January 2025

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2



This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.


Removing unsourced information

Please refrain from outright deleting unsourced or unrealiably sourced text that otherwise contributes to the quality of an article without discussion. Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as . In addition, please engage with the cited sources before taking action, as text that might seem unsourced at first glance may be confirmed by a citation further down in the section. Thank you. Khaverte (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that WP:RS is hard WP:POLICY on Misplaced Pages. One is always free to restore unsourced text with a WP:RS. - Amigao (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
I am aware of this. However, I am voicing this request because (a) requesting citations, rather than deleting text, makes the work of other Wikipedians easier, (b) immediate deletion may result in actually sourced text being deleted (as described in the initial message, and as has been the case in the History of opium in China article), and (c) text deletion may result in otherwise valuable and factual information being omitted despite a reliable source being available (but uncited), as not all contributors check the edit history of every page for instances of unsourced text removal that can be restored. See also WP:NOCITE. Khaverte (talk) 15:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
How would a reader even know that a statement is factual if there is no WP:RS there to back it up? That puts an undue burden on the reader to research unsourced text if they wish to confirm its veracity, which is an unrealistic expectation in most cases. How would they know that it is not WP:OR? Also, please see WP:PROVEIT. - Amigao (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
My point regarding (c) does not relate to the reader, but rather to future editors and article quality. Unsourced text deletion lowers the likelihood of WP:BESTSOURCES being added to the article when compared to the use of a {{Citation needed}} template, as it effectively hides the need for additional citations in the edit history. A {{Citation needed}} eliminates the burden on the reader you mention while also avoiding the issues of (a) and (b). Once again, please see WP:NOCITE. To illustrate my position: my work on History of opium in China would have been easier if you had used {{Citation needed}} instead, and if I had not been invested enough to monitor the article's history after my initial edits, it would be unlikely that an outside editor would have noticed the multiple instances of removal and provided the needed sources. Khaverte (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
You can also consider using a sandbox to write drafts if you do not yet have the sources to support the text. It is hard for editors to know when someone makes an edit and intends to add the source later and when they do not. Superb Owl (talk) 17:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
You seem to have misunderstood the issue. That is not at all the case that is being discussed here. Every one of my edits has been accompanied with citations. Khaverte (talk) 17:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
A tag for 'citations needed' is a temporary fix but one that seldom leads to the tagged text getting a WP:RS in practice. There are some good past discussions about this very issue in the talk archives of WP:V and WP:RS that I recommend. - Amigao (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Deletion, on the other hand, almost never (this case being an exceedingly rare exception) leads to the text getting a WP:RS, by virtue of the would-have-been-tagged text simply no longer existing in the article body. Why not choose seldom making the article better over almost never doing so?
You have still not addressed (a) or (b).
Could you please link to those discussions? There are 81 archive pages on WP:V alone and I do not find it reasonable to expect a user to read through all of them in search of a discussion concerning a specific topic. Khaverte (talk) 21:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
It's obvious he has a bias and interest in being Pro-American, Pro-Israel and Pro-Disruption in his edits. This account might be under the control of a government mass psyops program, he also removed my edit regarding Global Times and changed it back to being objective. We should report this account. Preaching of "state actors" in his user page while doing actions of similar caliber is crazy. Invictalock (talk) 10:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Also, thank you for adding WP:BESTSOURCES to History of opium in China. This is a good instance of how this process leads to an all-around stronger article. - Amigao (talk) 16:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

TNT and Synth

I don't call for TNT lightly - the references in that article are so entangled and use so much WP:SYNTH that blowing up and starting over really does seem like the correct call. Please review my detailed notes here - I put them at article talk because, regardless of whether my AfD succeeds, these serious deficiencies in citation need to be addressed. Simonm223 (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

It's quite obvious he has a bias and interest in being Pro-American, Pro-Israel and Pro-Foreign Interest in his edits. This account might be under the control of a government psyops effort, he also removed my edit regarding Global Times and changed it back to being heavily biased after I corrected his wording. We should seriously consider reporting this account. Preaching of "state actors" in his user page while engaging in the same behaviour is crazy. Invictalock (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Actually, while we don't always agree, I have a fair bit of respect for Amigao, who I think comports themselves appropriately on WP far better than average, which is why I came here and explained to them why I was attempting something unusual. Please don't try to involve me in your personal conflict. Simonm223 (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

PressTV as source of Iranian designation

I saw you removed my edit on Iran considering the HTS as terror org due to the PressTV source. How would this not fall under the exception. It's a state-media source being used to determine how the Iranian state considers the HTS (a terror group or otherwise). It's not being used as a source for facts on an event. ReiPeixe (talk) 00:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

It's obvious he has a bias and interest in being Pro-American, Pro-Israel and Pro-Disruption in his edits. This account might be under the control of a government mass psyops program, he also removed my edit regarding Global Times and changed it back to Objectivism. We should report this account. Preaching of "state actors" in his user page while doing actions of similar caliber is crazy. Invictalock (talk) 10:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

GA for Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications

Thought I should let you know that I plan to nominate the article Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act for GA. I am the third highest editor behind you and another so it felt right to let you know. If you had any interested in jumping in as a co-nom that would be wonderful but otherwise thank you for the work you've already put into the page. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Trying to kick XLinkBot

Are your two requests at User talk:XLinkBot/RevertList from a few months ago still worth pursuing? DMacks (talk) 22:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, DMacks. Yes, they are. Thanks. - Amigao (talk) 18:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Yang Youlin - Questionable Edits

Hello. I come inquiring about the article on Mr. Yang Youlin and your edits in relation to his article. I would like to state that your deletion of the Legacy section seems a bit biased. The Legacy section was added to provide the readers with information as to how he is memoralized in China, not exactly to propogate Communist ideals. The deletion of the section seems somewhat biased, considering that it did contain some quotes which did harbor communist sentiment. The information is meant to convey how he is memoralized, not to tell the reader how to feel about their death.


If there is any justifiable defense against your actions, I'd like to hear it. PrivateRyan44 (talk) 01:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

The text requires WP:RS to back it up, which it did not have. Nothing wrong with a 'Legacy' section per se, but it must be backed up with WP:RS. - Amigao (talk) 01:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Reliable sources, yes I understand that. Working on that right now; if you looked at the previous version I added, I did put a few more sources. If you wish, you can search through the Hubei Provincial Archives yourself for more info. PrivateRyan44 (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
WP:CS is also a great resource for citing. - Amigao (talk) 01:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

I really don't know what to make out of it

See this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Peter_Schechter&oldid=1264739643 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥 07:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Definitely not a WP:RS. - Amigao (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Greetings of the season


A Merry Christmas. (Sled with holly)
~ ~ ~ Greetings of the season ~ ~ ~ Hello Amigao: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, Spread the love; use {{subst:User:Dustfreeworld/Xmas3}} to send this message. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 11:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Amigao!

Happy New Year!

Amigao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
The Account 2 (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chengdu J-36, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Diplomat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Repeated removals of unreliably-sourced information

Please refrain from outright deleting unreliably-sourced text that otherwise contributes to the quality of an article without discussion. Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as . In addition, please engage with the cited sources before taking action, as text that might seem unsourced at first glance may be confirmed by a citation further down in the section. Thank you. Dant3gramsci (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Instead you could find a source to cite or use a template such as
No, it's the editor insisting on the content is the one who should find the reliable source.Also, why you claim the removals are "repeated"? ManyAreasExpert (talk) 13:55, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
You might want to also review WP:BURDEN and WP:ONUS. - Amigao (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Restore My Profile

Hello Amigao, I'm very confused as to why my profile was deleted, and specifically regarding the 'sustained notability' issue.

Note... aside from being a globally respected dancer and entertainer for nearly 40 years, as well as a globally acknowledged and respected life coach, I've also appeared in many major media outlets including The New York Times, The Huffington Post, Access Hollywood, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune and TV Guide, been nominated for a GLADD award, as well as me getting a special acknowledgment from the former mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel with "Feb 5, 2017 to be Carlton Wilborn Day In Chicago in recognition of his extraordinary life and enduring efforts that impact culture inform community and inspire change", to name a few.

I believe the issue showed up because I went in last month to update some things, and maybe I did it incorrectly. For sure it was not my intention to go against the rules of Misplaced Pages. My Sincere Apology!

Please know that everything I had on my profile was 100% legit!

Any support you can generate to expedite the process of reinstating my profile would be greatly appreciated!

Thank You in advance! Carlton Carltonrising (talk) 12:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Would recommend that you start with WP:COIEDIT. - Amigao (talk) 03:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

S with CCs

Hey! I don't know what happened, FYI I didn't revert your changes intentionally, must have misclicked it when I was reviewing some changelogs. Sorry about that, and Happy New Year! Top5a (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)