Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 11:42, 24 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 21 days

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting.

view · edit Frequently asked questions Q: Why does the article state Kennedy "is known for advocating anti-vaccine misinformation"? A: There is a consensus that numerous reliable sources describe Kennedy as promoting anti-vaccine misinformation. This wording is the result of a 2023 RfC. Q: Why does article state that Kennedy advocates "public health–related conspiracy theories"? A: Consensus is that multiple, independent, reliable sources describe Kennedy as an advocate and/or promoter of conspiracy theories. This wording is the result of a 2023 RfC.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Misplaced Pages policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Misplaced Pages are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Other talk page banners

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Autism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance). COVID-19 Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Massachusetts / Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance). United States Presidents: Donald Trump This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Presidents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of United States Presidents on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States PresidentsWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United States PresidentsUnited States Presidents ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Donald Trump task force. Skepticism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Virginia: University of Virginia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. [REDACTED] This article is supported by WikiProject University of Virginia (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2024, when it received 13,390,576 views. This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 11 times. The weeks in which this happened: August 30 to September 5, 2020 September 6 to 12, 2020 April 2 to 8, 2023 April 16 to 22, 2023 June 11 to 17, 2023 June 25 to July 1, 2023 August 18 to 24, 2024 August 25 to 31, 2024 November 3 to 9, 2024 November 10 to 16, 2024 November 17 to 23, 2024 The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Jordanbakernyc (talk · contribs) has been paid by Team Kennedy on behalf of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosed here.

List of Awards and Honors

Was wholly deleted. While I agree with the editor that many of the honors are trivial, I think the removal warrants more discussion and justification.

The editors argument that the honors can be addressed in prose may have the weakness that the prose is too lengthy. List of awards and honors are common in biographic articles. What is the minimum number of notable awards needed to justify a list?

It would be useful to know this history of the list. Also, I do not want to list honors for a charlatan. trysten (talk) 02:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

A list of awards should only contains ones that are noteworthy, those that have seen coverage by reliable sources. In skimming the deleted content, they appear to be largely if not wholly sourced to primary and/or not-reliable sources. Zaathras (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Summary comments should be more representative of article body

I think there should be improvements to the summary of this article to better represent the body of the article.

The summary says that RFK jr "is an American politician, environmental lawyer, anti-vaccine activist, and conspiracy theorist.". To better represent the content in the body of the article, I recommend changing this to:

"...is an American politician, environmental lawyer, venture capitalist, startup founder, and activist. Kennedy holds several beliefs outside of mainstream opinion."

Reasoning as follows: The existing summary focuses on his professions, his activities and his beliefs. The summary comments leave out from his profession the significant work he did for the Venture Capital firm that he co-founded, including a notable early investment in Tesla Inc. It also leaves of the multiple start up companies that he founded. These are important aspects of his career, representing multi-year committments.

For activism, the summary specifies only the anti-vaccine activism, and leaves out the other actism that is specified in the body of the article. This includes activism in public health, public safety, indigenous rights and renewable energy. It would be much more representative to just say he is an "activist" instead of an "anti-vaccine activist".

The summary specifies only his belief in conspiracy theories, and leaves out various other beliefs specified in the body of the article. The article body describes a wide range of beliefs, some of them conventional, and some of them unconventional. For the summary to only list his conspiracy theory belief is not representative, and possibly violates the NPOV policy. MensaGlobetrotter (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

No objection to adding "venture capitalist". But his antivax activism is the most important and most part of his anti-public-health activism, given his main job in the last 20 years. Yes, he not only wants to protect the measles virus from vaccination, but also caries bacteria from fluoridation, but that was only a small part of his output. And outside of mainstream opinion is far too milquetoast for a guy experts call "an extinction-level threat to federal public health programs and science-based health policy". --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply and for engaging me in this discussion. I agree with much of what you say. However when I read the body of the article, I also see 20+ years of indigenous rights activism, and 20+ years of environmental activism that goes beyond his job as a lawyer. Further, the Encyclopedia Britannica summary section for this person refers to him only as "activist", without specifying any one kind of activism.

My goal here is only to raise the level of quality of the article to better meet encyclopedic standards, by ensuring NPOV and that the summary section of this article represents the body. I don't have a problem with the details in the body of the article.

So how about if we add "venture capitalist", and change to "activist" instead of an "anti-vaccine activist"?

Thanks for your time and consideration. MensaGlobetrotter (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm not seeing where RFK Jr. has notability as a venture capitalist. Jr. did some work for a VC firm, VantagePoint, which is documented in this article. But the articles describing that relationship do not say that Jr. invested his own money in new ventures, only that he provided advice and served on boards and was made a partner and earned a salary. I saw no mention of notable early investment in Tesla, or any investment at all. If this famous person indeed had notability as a venture capitalist, it wouldn't be hard to find reliable sources documenting that.

The history seems to be that instead of investing his money in startups, other people shower money on RFK Jr. Other people give him lucrative board positions for his connections, give him gifts, even bought his house and paid for his vacations. It seems that RFK Jr. is the opposite of a capitalist investor, he sucks money from startups and troubled ventures that want to use his name and connections. -- M.boli (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, and thanks for sharing the article. So yes, based on what is in the article, it would be a stretch to put venture capitalist in the summary. I will note that your article does confirm that VantagePoint was an early investor in Tesla and provides expanded context for what he was doing there. So your article should probably be an inline citation for the existing content on VantagePoint, which is not as well sourced otherwise.

Additionally, your article does document a significant amount of activism beyond what is in the Misplaced Pages article. So I think this really aligns with my earlier recommendation to put "activist" instead of an "anti-vaccine activist" in the summary, much as Encyclopedia Britannica does.

Finally, I missed this earlier because I was focused on his career, but the 14 books he authored in the Selected Works section suggest that "author" should also be included in the summary section. It appears that at least one of his books made the New York Times bestseller list, which is notable enough that the Selected Works section should probably mention that. Given the subject matter, it is probably also appropriate for the Selected Works section to say that some works are controversial if there is an easy reference to support that. Thoughts? MensaGlobetrotter (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

No. The subject's more recent activities and antics in the antivaxxer circles dwarf his prior business ventures. Zaathras (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I 100% agree, but Misplaced Pages's policy on Misplaced Pages:Truth and Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, not truth basically say that if mainstream media outlets generally refer to a person as one thing, then the site's article on that person must reflect that. If you want to draw an independent conclusion that journalism may be biased, skewed, or even organized propaganda, you, as an editor, will get labeled as a conspiracy theorist. Bourne Ballin (talk) 17:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

References

1. Craig, Susanne (2023-11-16). "How R.F.K. Jr. Has Turned His Public Crusades Into a Private Windfall". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2025-01-04.

I have found a better picture of RFK Jr. that I believe should replace the current info-box image

I believe this picture of him is more clearer and more high quality. I will leave it up to you guys if you think it should replace the current info-box image. CMBGAMER 2018 (talk) 09:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

It's one Gage Skidmore photo vs. another, don't really see one as better. Zaathras (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Inappropriate use of the term proof

In the article, the term proof is used once for compelling evidence, or simply evidence. Proof should not be used without a expert's judgment that the evidence is sufficient to meet a stated standard of proof. Recommending that the article be edited accordingly. John (talk) 20:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

When one floats false conspiracy theories, one tends to do that without proof. That is the nature of being, well, a conspiracy theorist. Zaathras (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

The act of calling someone a conspiracy theorists makes you, well, a conspiracy theorist. 65.30.157.169 (talk) 11:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Nobel Laureates and doctors oppose his cabinet position

@Bourne Ballin: And anyone else. Why do you oppose this in the lead? "Over 75 Nobel Laureates, and seventeen thousand doctors have urged the U.S. Senate to reject Kennedy for the cabinet position." DolyaIskrina (talk) 17:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, it follows the content in the main body of the article. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 17:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Lead section and Misplaced Pages:neutral point of view. It belongs in the article's body section, but is too far from why Kennedy is notable to the public. The article's neutrality has already been disputed (just look at this talk page), and online petitions or high-profile individuals opposing the subject at a government post is not that significant. He was nominated by a Republican candidate, which means it will be polarizing on half of the U.S. voting population regardless. If this were significant, the site would suggest adding to a presidential candidate’s article that “50 U.S. Senators opposed for the presidency,” “100 Medal of Freedom Recipients,” “50 Nobel Prize Winners,” etc. Interesting, but not why the subject is deserving of an article.

Additionally, the petition is online, and anyone falsely claim they're a physician (by checking a few boxes) and sign it — irresponsible on behalf of the petition's creator, but still something of concern. Bourne Ballin (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

This isn't your average political squabbling, as shown by all the RS that comment on this. Nobel Laureates have never opposed a cabinet appointment before, let alone 77 of them. Kennedy is a NOTABLY controversial appointment. The body of the article make this clear. So per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, there is no good reason to keep it out of the lead. DolyaIskrina (talk) 18:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Leads are supposed to be concise. Putting that in the lead is too much detail from pure WP:RECENTISM. What will matter for the lead is whether he is confirmed or not, not who supports or opposes the nomination. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you think the fact that he went to Harvard, which is in the lead, is more or less notable than the fact that nearly one out of ten living Nobel Laureates oppose his appointment? DolyaIskrina (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

At this point, I'd say that for his total bio, his education is more relevant than opposition to his cabinet nomination. Though I would not be opposed to cutting that. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Not lead worthy.... this type of criticism happens to every appointee. Moxy🍁 19:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

References

1. "Read the Letter From Nobel Laureates Urging That Mr. Kennedy Not be Confirmed". The New York Times. 2024-12-09. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-12-10.
2. Rosenbluth, Teddy (December 9, 2024). "Nobel Laureates Urge Senate to Turn Down Kennedy's Nomination". New York Times.
3. Frazier, Kierra (2025-01-09). "Over 17,000 doctors sign letter urging Senate to reject RFK Jr. as health secretary - CBS News". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2025-01-11.
4. "Physicians Take Action". Committee to Protect Health Care. Retrieved 2025-01-11.
5. https://committeetoprotect.org/stop-rfk-jr/

• Misplaced Pages controversial topics
• Biography articles of living people
• B-Class biography articles
• B-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
• Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
• Arts and entertainment work group articles
• B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
• Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
• Politics and government work group articles
• B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
• Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
• Science and academia work group articles
• WikiProject Biography articles
• B-Class Autism articles
• Low-importance Autism articles
• WikiProject Autism articles
• B-Class Christianity articles
• Low-importance Christianity articles
• B-Class Catholicism articles
• Low-importance Catholicism articles
• WikiProject Catholicism articles
• WikiProject Christianity articles
• B-Class COVID-19 articles
• Low-importance COVID-19 articles
• WikiProject COVID-19 articles
• B-Class law articles
• Low-importance law articles
• WikiProject Law articles
• B-Class New York (state) articles
• Low-importance New York (state) articles
• B-Class politics articles
• Low-importance politics articles
• B-Class American politics articles
• Low-importance American politics articles
• American politics task force articles
• WikiProject Politics articles
• B-Class United States articles
• Low-importance United States articles
• B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
• B-Class Massachusetts articles
• Low-importance Massachusetts articles
• WikiProject Massachusetts articles
• B-Class United States presidential elections articles
• Low-importance United States presidential elections articles
• WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
• WikiProject United States articles
• B-Class United States Presidents articles
• Unknown-importance United States Presidents articles
• B-Class Donald Trump articles
• Mid-importance Donald Trump articles
• Donald Trump task force articles
• B-Class Skepticism articles
• Mid-importance Skepticism articles
• WikiProject Skepticism articles
• B-Class Virginia articles
• Low-importance Virginia articles
• B-Class University of Virginia articles
• Low-importance University of Virginia articles
• WikiProject University of Virginia articles
• WikiProject Virginia articles
• Pages in the Misplaced Pages Top 25 Report
• Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions