Misplaced Pages

User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:58, 22 November 2024 editImagineDragonsFan101 (talk | contribs)35 edits Reverted content: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:45, 9 January 2025 edit undoMalcolmxl5 (talk | contribs)Administrators149,241 edits Thomas Partey: Thanks.Tag: Reply 
(57 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 30K |maxarchivesize = 30K
|counter = 96 |counter = 97
|minthreadsleft = 1 |minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(48h) |algo = old(48h)
Line 19: Line 19:
}} }}


== Block ==
== Warnings, blocks, and overriding judgement ==


Block with. All project ] (]) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
That thread is already going to be bad enough without adding this tangent, so I'll bring it here. Your judgement was still that a block wasn't necessary in that situation, and although you did say another admin could block it would still be overriding your judgement in that case. I didn't feel so strongly that you were wrong in this instance that I'd take another action, just said it's not the action I would have taken. ] (]) 14:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
* Sorry, I'm not sure what this means. ] 11:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


== Thomas Partey ==
: also might add a bit of context. ] (]) 14:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:: {{u|ScottishFinnishRadish}} Fair enough. You may also note Explicit's comment on his talk page in reply to me. ] 14:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:::That was part of it too, as I'm familiar with and know people who use {{tq|get off my dick}} or {{tq|get off my nuts}} in a non-sexual way, but I still think it is wildly inappropriate. I don't see it as a heteronormative issue as much as a sexualization of commentary to attack another editor issue. ] (]) 14:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)


Can you have a look at the antics at ] please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — ] (]) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
== Reverted content ==
* {{u|Malcolmxl5}} Indefinitely blocked and every edit revision deleted. I've also semi-protected the article. Thanks, ] 21:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey, you reverted content on Fortnite Festival that I added. Why? ] (]) 23:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC) *:Thanks. ] (]) 21:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
* (1) It wasn't sourced - see ]. (2) You kept repeatedly adding it - see ]. Thanks, ] 23:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
*:Thanks. Tomorrow I’ll source it and re-add it after the 24 Hour period. Thank you. ] (]) 23:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:45, 9 January 2025


"And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth." Frightened Rabbit
Black Kite
Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on.
For Talk Page Archives, click here.
If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly.

Block

Block with. All project 41.34.58.81 (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Thomas Partey

Can you have a look at the antics at Thomas Partey please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)