| Revision as of 21:58, 29 November 2024 editEcrusized (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,427 edits →Page protection request: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:16, 1 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,652 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Favonian/Archive 58) (botTag: Manual revert |
| (32 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
|
{{busy}} |
|
{{busy}} |
|
] |
|
] |
|
|
|
|
== Revert == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello there, could you explain why you reverted my edits? Thanks! ] (]) 18:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Did so on your talk page. ] (]) 18:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Oh, I saw your message. Thanks. I'm just trying to improve the page. But I understand your points. ] (]) 18:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Do you think I could add back my edit regarding the Mayoral Council for England? ] (]) 18:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks for the revert. Note that their was much the same as from LTA ]. ] (]) 18:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{ec}} Sure. My issue was with ]. ] (]) 18:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Thanks! ] (]) 18:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I'm not Lam312321321 though. I was told by someone on Reddit history subreddit to make that edit. ] (]) 18:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Well, that makes you, at the very least, a ], and blocked you are. ] (]) 18:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== SPI ID question == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, I'm getting around to opening a SPI ticket for a particular LTA attested effusively at, ''inter alia'', |
|
|
* {{IP|5.194.177.218/24}} |
|
|
* {{IP|83.110.116.0/22}} |
|
|
* {{IP|83.110.168.0/24}} |
|
|
* {{IP|83.110.170.177/22}} |
|
|
* {{IP|91.75.84.0/24}} |
|
|
* {{IP|92.98.104.0/21}} (blocked by you) |
|
|
* {{IP|94.59.210.0/23}} (blocked by you) |
|
|
* {{IP|176.205.172.32/22}} |
|
|
* {{IP|217.164.84.0/22}} |
|
|
* {{IP|217.164.228.0/22}} |
|
|
* {{IP|217.165.172.0/22}} |
|
|
* {{IP|217.165.203.0/22}} |
|
|
Does this one have a case? You seem to be the most aware of their existence so far. They are incredibly prolific not to have one, it's bizarre. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 20:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{ping|Remsense}} There's no SPI case, as far as I know, and I've never caught them using a named account. I've been reverting their useless edits for the past four years or so. In the beginning, their IPs geo-located to Iran, but for the past 4 years, they've been editing from UAE. As you have observed, their MO is easily recognized, but also easily contained according to ]. ] (]) 21:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Right—that was my MO before, but I've found caches that are months or years old of their uncorrected edits. After bringing them up while chatting with other editors, they recommended I consider filing at SPI about it, but obviously the risk and reward are both comparatively low since they don't use named accounts. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 21:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Some editors who deal with incessant IP hopping LTAs create a subpage(s) (sort of like a personal ] page) that they link to when reverting the edits and/or requesting blocks at AIV. An epic example is ].-- ]<sup>]</sup> 21:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::An example to strike performance anxiety in us all. ] (]) 21:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Page protection request == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, can you please semi protect ], I made a request hours ago but no one has responded. This is a highly viewed ITN article getting heavy vandalism. Thank you. ] (]) 21:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
