Misplaced Pages

User talk:Doc James: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:53, 6 December 2024 editDoc James (talk | contribs)Administrators312,280 edits →You may be interested in this medical article← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,459 edits →Administrators' newsletter – January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Note: Mostly over at '''''' Note: Mostly over at ''''''


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
== Norovirus#Vaccine_trials ==


] from the past month (December 2024).
This needs updating. Do you have journal access in order to back up claimes being made in the UK media?


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/worlds-first-norovirus-vaccine-set-to-be-trialled-by-nhs-to-combat-winter-vomiti/<br>
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/other/world-first-vaccine-for-vomiting-bug-norovirus-trialled-in-the-uk/ar-AA1sJTQ2


] '''Administrator changes'''
The claims seem to relate to Phase 3 trials in the United Kingdom. ] (]) 17:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
:I personally do not see the need for review articles to discuss this. The popular press IMO is just fine as one is just stating that a trial is about to begin, not making any medical claims ] ] (] · ] · ]) 07:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
::Found one review and it is under an open license. ] (] · ] · ]) 08:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div>
== Uploading images to Wikimedia from open source journal articles ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
Quick question about protocol for medical images -- are we allowed to upload images from open source scientific journals to Wikimedia? If so, is there anything we need to do beyond giving the article's reference in the description? ] (]) 19:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
]


] '''Oversight changes'''
:Yes we can as long as they are CC BY or CC BY SA. For NC and ND licensed images you can upload them here to . Nothing special from a pt consent POV as it is assumed that the journal itself takes care of that. Have been thinking of doing a mass upload at some point. ] (] · ] · ]) 00:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


</div>
::Very helpful, thank you. ] (]) 02:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
== Top 100 medical calculators ==
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
Copied from ]:
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.


] '''Arbitration'''
:::::Plan to do the top 100 medical calculators in December. Would love to have your help. ] (] · ] · ]) 07:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.
::::::Ha ha ha, that would be a great honour! Happy to see you appreciate my design.
::::::Without any false modesty: I think the calculator design already outclasses the commercial version. The user interface looks so simple, but there is quite a bit of processing going on under the hood to get to the right silhouette and ] which ].
::::::And... it will get even better as it does not deal yet with fine-tuning for male-female, age, ... differences.
::::::] is ] to explain the ]. Work in progress: ]
::::::Gender, age won't impact the WHtR and BRI computations but
::::::* ]
::::::* will impact the health level text
::::::* it will also impact the background color.
::::::What would you like me to do? What can I do to help you? ] (]) 08:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Will let you know when I am back and working on it. We need a eGFR calculator, we need one to switch between America and IU for blood sugar, etc, etc. ] (] · ] · ]) 08:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
{{odd}}


] '''Miscellaneous'''
Good. Be warned: my medical knowledge is limited, almost non existent. I have very limited experience in working with medics.
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]


----
You already lost me with terms as eGFR, IU. I've heard about blood sugar, but don't know much about it. So I will need a lot of input for medical terms, formulas, translations from jargon to plain language, etc, etc.
{{center|{{flatlist|

* ]
Be aware that design takes time, sweet time. It is hard to design simple things. Something easy like a body roundness calculator can take weeks, for just two input variables. And that is when I have time to spare.
* ]

* ]
What can be done quite fast: evaluate a current design.
}}}}
* What is good about it?
<!--
* How can it be improved?
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}

<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->
Warning: I apply function psychology in my designs,
* the way humans process information dictates the design. No room to discuss the information processing cycle: observe, interpret, learn, think, act and back to observe, interpret, ...
* Science is leading, well defined qualities and limitations of the human eye, brain, hands dictate the design. A design should be tailored to humans, not vice versa.
* I will ignore the usual personal preferences, opinions, etc with remarks like: Mate how interesting, I think you should go and tell someone who cares!

The term {{search link|function psychology}} seems unknown in the English Misplaced Pages, well the whole English speaking world. There are bits and pieces of design theory coming from people like ], ], ], the late ] and his son ], ], ]. But names like ] and {{search link|Leonard Verhoef}} are almost unknown.

So well... you may be in for a few surprises. Working with me may be tough, no guarantees, but happy to give it a go. ] (]) 09:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

:IU is international units… GFR is glomerular filtration rate. We can see how it goes. ] (] · ] · ]) 09:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
::Ha ha ha, asif 'glomerular filtration rate' is plain English, not incomprehensible medical jargon to me. Sorry, but my medical knowledge is very limited indeed. ] (]) 21:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
::Smile, I looked up ] in Misplaced Pages.
::The first sentence is reads for me as:
::"*** functions include maintaining an ***; regulating fluid balance; regulating ***, ***, and other ***;"
::I am already lost at the very first word and it does not have a hyperlink to another page.
::It has something to do with regulating fluid levels, but I am completely clueless what kind of fluids that would be. ] (]) 21:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
=== out of the woods? ===
When you are out of the woods, please have a look at:

1. Some documentation for the calculator at:
]
I expect the design approach for other medical applications to be similar:
* Let the computer do all the number crunching, focus on human efficiency, not computer efficiency.
* show categories based on patient values, generally speaking ranging from deadly to healthy.
* in an environment outside wikipedia patient values are probably digitally available. Maybe even with a history. Mrs. Jones, things look a lot better for you than last month!
:Related ]
<p>
2. A design for a Body Roundness calculator, no input required, zero,
just look at the chart, use height for Y axes, waist for X:
]
And yes, it does support both metric and imperial, without any input. Look mum, no hands!
<p>
3. An idea for something similar, with 2 input variables, unit indepenent:
]
That design is beyond calculator possibilities at the moment.
<p>
4. A nasty bug in calculator 4.0. I can't find anything wrong in my own code,
suspect that the calculator already hits a limit of formula propagation
]
test it out yourself at
]
The calculator has a lot of hidden fields.
A developer may want to see them all for debuging, change CSS class 'obscured' from
display: none
to
display: inline
to see all of the calculator fields.
Be warned: there are a lot of formulas here at work, which eh... well cause the bug.
Change 'class=obscured' for a row in the wikicode to see just some intermediate values.
] (]) 23:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

:Away for a few weeks. Have asked Brian to look at that bug. ] (] · ] · ]) 00:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
::G'd on ya, thanks! That bug is kind of a worry at the moment. That limit could really f*** things up when calculators get complex using more than 2 input fields.
::As a reward, here is an idea for a brandnew state of the art medical tool for a check on central adiposity against WHtR no-health-worries upper limit of 0.5. (ha ha ha, that is about the max medical jargon I know)
::Here we go:
::# take a piece of string equal to your height. If no string available, an old cloth will do fine too.
::# try to wrap it around your waist twice
::# too short? Bad news mate, you have health risks because of increased central adiposity, as defined at ]
::Smile... this method was reverted from the WHtR page, because of some Misplaced Pages policy.
::Do you know anybody in the medical world that could publish this method in a reliable source after an official peer review? That would be just too deadly!
::And it is just too easy. A 3 year old in outback Australia would have checked the adiposity of the whole community against the NICE 0.5 WHtR limit while the western doctors are still struggling with the BRI formulas because their smartphone battery is dead, with no electricity in sight for a recharge. And I have yet to see classifications for BRI values. To me this is silly. How can you use meaningless numbers? The 3 year old will have 2 simple classifications:
::* good
::* too fat
::A kind that is a few years older may invent a method of checking the lower WHtR limit of 0.4 by some fancy folding of the excess bit of string against the rest of it. Look mum, no batteries and uncle XYZ is too lean!
::I really wonder. Why would anybody use BRI over WHtR?
::Can't they see they are related and WHtR is just to easy.
::A tool used during debugging that caused a bit of turmoil, the WHtR to BRI converter here on the right.
::]
::While you are at it, how about a peer review for that converter? ha ha ha.
::Some other issues where a medic can help:
::# Any reliable source for a classification of a WHtR value below 0.4? Currently the Calculator 4.0 displays an error message, because it lacks a NICE classification.
::# How about using Zang's mortality graph for colour gradients behind silhouettes. See 2nd level of pyramid, right hand block of ]
::I've used Zang's graph for previous set of colours too, which were BRI based, with a terrible overlap against BMI classes.
::]
::And yes the calculator has a risk level, based on NICE classes at ]
::Now health risk and chance of dying might be very correlated, but health risk and dying are two different concepts.
::The line mortality graph would be perfect for a mapping to colour gradients.
::See colour work in progress at ]
::I think a green to dark red gradient would work great for the lower end of the scale. Please feel welcome to join in and get the discussion on colours going again, as it has been stuck in the mud for quite some time now.
::{{clear}} ] (]) 01:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

=== That’s 2 small steps in a sandbox, 1 giant leap for mankind. ===

{{Template:Body_roundness_index/sandbox}}
# unit-less input for height and weight. Any unit, a piece of string will do.
# play with WHtR to find healthy waist size.

Please:
# Record the start time with accuracy in seconds
# Enter your own height
# Find a healthy waist size
# Record the end time
# How long did it take you, including the learning curve?

Next:
# Record time again and try to find a healthy waist size for some friend or family.
# How long did it take you, without the learning curve?

Final:
# How long does it take you to do this with the commercial tool?

I think the calculator just overtook the commercial calculator by a miles length, 1.60934 km for people using metric system. But who gives a s*** about units :D

Are there any serious competitors for the top 100? ] (]) 12:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Kudos to: ] and ] for sharing 'impossible' ideas.

=== One chart, many calculations for 1 patient? ===
A paramedic assisted in a usability test today for the Body Roundness Calculator 4.1.

Have video of the whole test. That video won't make it online. Test subject prefers to stay anonymous and spoke local language, not English. Interesting results, back to drawing board again. Discussed zero input chart options. Got feedback: yeah, but you'll need many charts to cover all aspects of one patient. True...

Will be back with just one chart per patient, showing many calculator results in time.

] (]) 19:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 18 November 2024 ==

<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2024-11-18}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 16--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 23:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1258243105 -->

== You may be interested in this medical article ==

I just started this: ]. I hope you’re well. ] (]) 04:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
::Not surprised. Glad we do not have those up here in Canada. ] (] · ] · ]) 16:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 January 2025

Note: Mostly over at MDWiki.org

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)