| Revision as of 00:20, 9 December 2024 editExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators328,258 edits Replies.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025 edit undoExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators328,258 edits →Deleted articles: Reply. | ||
| (167 intermediate revisions by 53 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 56 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | |minthreadstoarchive = 5 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==Deleted articles== | ==Deleted articles== | ||
| Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::Can I please see the deleted ]. ] (]) |
::Can I please see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::: |
::::Can I please see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ] was just a redirect to ]. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::: |
::::::Please can I see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::: |
::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ] and ]. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} |
:::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} and . ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::: |
::::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles ], ], and ]. ] (]) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] |
:::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} , , . ]] 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::::::::Please can I see deleted article ]. ] (]) 06:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 06:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::::@]@]@] | |||
| ::::::::::::::Hello brillliant minds - perhaps if you wanted for the page to be complete you'd get the gist of things than just rushing to delete the page with empty content. Unlike most of you lucky chaps in developed countries, I had a power outage before I could even complete the page. | |||
| ::::::::::::::So, if possible, heroes of Misplaced Pages, i would like to finish updating the page and only then can you decide to proceed with the deletion. | |||
| ::::::::::::::I'll wait to hear from you masters of the uniververse. | |||
| ::::::::::::::Cheers. ] (]) 11:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} {{Reply to|Aatsol2007}} Hi, which page are you referring to exactly? ]] 00:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo == | |||
| :@] {{tpw}} Perhaps, under your circumstances, you should start out writing a draft, perhaps in ] and then move it to mainspace when you're done, or if you want someone else to check the draft over before it's an article, ]ion. Though I have to agree with Explicit above. Knowing which article we're talking about will help greatly. ] ] ] 06:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of ] on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! ] (]) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == File:V - Fri(end)s.png == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at ]? It seems like it's at least {{tlx|PD-ineligible-USonly}} to me per ], but I'm not sure whether it's {{tlx|PD-shape}}/{{tlx|PD-logo}} based on ] since that's where ], the label that released "]", is located. -- ] (]) 06:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, after viewing a of the cover, it seems that even the border design is too complex to qualify for {{tl|PD-ineligible-USonly}}. ]] 03:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for taking a look at this. -- ] (]) 08:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| When deleting files per ], please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced ] version. --] (]) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :{{Reply to|Stefan2}} I have uploaded the higher resolution. ]] 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg == | |||
| Hi, you deleted the page on ] saying you couldn't find any sources, but just a quick search on google scholar finds a few: | |||
| * : The Qur'an school and trajectories of Islamic education {{tq|A karamogo was an Islamic scholar, a term compounded by the verb "kalan" and noun "mogo". "Kalan" means to read/recite/teach/study while "mogo" means person. A student is called "karamogo den" (lit. scholar child) while a teacher is called "karamogo fa" (lit. scholarly father). A teacher like a father has perpetual authority over his student, one that endures after the student has completed their studies.}} | |||
| * others just mention the term rather than discuss | |||
| ] (]) 15:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Kowal2701}} Hi, the deletion summary is a copy of the words used by the user who ], not mine. Are you ] the deletion? ]] 03:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, I’ll go through the process, thank you ] (]) 07:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Kowal2701}} <!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Done''' – as a contested ], the article has been restored upon request.<!-- End Template:UND - prod --> ]] 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- ] (]) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == About the categories of North Indian and South Indian descent. == | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{tl|npd}} works in this case. ]] 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for checking. -- ] (]) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg == | |||
| I noticed that you placed a speedy deletion tag on the categories ] and ]. I would like to offer some reasons why these categories should be retained, as they highlight important aspects of diversity within the broader Indian-American community: | |||
| Recognition of Cultural and Regional Diversity: | |||
| India is an incredibly diverse country with distinct regional identities, languages, cuisines, traditions, and cultural practices. Categorizing individuals of South Indian and North Indian descent helps acknowledge these unique aspects within the diaspora, which otherwise might be overlooked in broader, generalized categories. | |||
| Better Representation: | |||
| These categories allow for a more granular understanding of how various communities contribute to American society. For example, South Indian Americans have made significant contributions in fields like technology and classical arts, while North Indian Americans are prominent in areas like politics and Bollywood-inspired media. | |||
| Facilitating Research and Accessibility: | |||
| Scholars, journalists, and readers looking to explore specific contributions or experiences of South Indian or North Indian communities in the U.S. will find such categorization invaluable. It ensures that resources and information are easier to locate and study. | |||
| Reflecting Diaspora Identity: | |||
| Many Indian Americans identify strongly with their regional heritage (e.g., Tamil, Kannada, Punjabi, or Gujarati). These categories validate and reflect the lived experiences and identities of people within the diaspora. | |||
| Consistency with Other Ethnic Subcategories: | |||
| Misplaced Pages frequently recognizes subcategories for other ethnic or national groups, such as ] or ]. The proposed categories are consistent with this practice of nuanced representation. | |||
| I believe these categories enrich Misplaced Pages’s diversity and inclusivity by acknowledging the varied and vibrant backgrounds within the Indian-American community. I hope this perspective provides a reason to reconsider the deletion proposal. | |||
| Looking forward to your response! ] (]) 16:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like ). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail ] since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in ] most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- ] (]) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :P.S. Please reply on my talk page. ] (]) 16:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::@] {{tpw}} I see that you've also put a message on {{U|Liz}}s talk page. ] ] ] 16:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Jay Estiquita.jpg == | |||
| == Close of ] == | |||
| Could you also take a look at ]? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. ] looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about ]. -- ] (]) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Does this close prejudice any decision to redirect the subunits to the main article per ]? There were no comments on them to my knowledge and the sources provided in the AfD doesn't provide enough coverage to justify a stand alone article for them. ] (]) 01:50, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Traumnovelle}} It would probably be best if you made your proposal on the talk pages of the articles and pinging the AFD participants instead of redirecting them outright. Otherwise, your actions may be viewed as an attempt to circumvent the consensus to keep the articles. ]] 03:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I shall do that, thanks. ] (]) 03:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== A barnstar for you! == | ||
| {| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);" | |||
| Hello, | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' | |||
| I see that you closed ] as delete, but it would seem that both of the redirects WP:WHITEWASH and WP:WHITEWASHING still function and have not been deleted yet? Can you please complete the delete. ] (]) 04:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| :{{Reply to|Kowal2701}} Hi, it's deleted on my side. Maybe ] can do the trick? ]] 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :: | |||
| |} | |||
| :: | |||
| ::Looks like there is no history of them being deleted? Am I missing something ] (]) 12:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Iljhgtn}} Oh, I see now. Only ] and ] were listed for deletion. ] and ] weren't tagged or mentioned at all. {{U|George Ho}}, you'll need to follow up on these. I can't delete them out of process as they were never nominated for deletion. ]] 13:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::What is different with those? Are they not the same? ] (]) 13:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Even so, WP:Whitewash still redirects, when it should not now, correct? ] (]) 13:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Flag photo == | |||
| Would you please restore the local version of ]? It is ineligible for ], as I requested that the file be {{tl|keep local}} after I took and while I was uploading it. Thanks, <small>— ]<sup> (]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">])</sub></small> 08:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The keep local tag was removed by ], and on a bunch of other files too. I've reverted the ones that haven't been deleted yet, but most have been. Explicit, since you probably deleted them all (at least, you did for all the ones where I looked at the logs), would you rather I compile a list, or undelete them myself as I find them? —] 09:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{Reply to|Godsy|Cryptic}} Oh, what a naughty IP. {{Frown}} I went through their deleted contributions and found that most of their edits that resulted in subtracted bytes to the page were replacing {{tl|keep local}} with {{tl|mtc}}. I've restored a few more files. ]] 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've restored ], where {{tl|keep local}} was replaced with {{tl|move to Commons}} and so added bytes instead. —] 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Does being tagged with "keep local" mean that a file can't be moved to Commons? Adding "keep local" seems to just be a request that a local copy be kept, not that the file not be moved to Commons, right? A local file that has the same name as a Commons file will be used on Misplaced Pages (it shadows out the Commons file), but the Commons file can still be used by other WMF projects, right? I'm not suggesting the IP was correct in removing the "Keep local" template, but wondering whether the restored files could still be tagged for a move to Commons. -- ] (]) 00:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{tl|Keep local}} is a request that a file not be moved to Commons - a move, by definition, means that it won't be in the original place anymore. It can still be ''copied'' to Commons. There's a {{tl|copy to Commons}} template specifically for that, though it wouldn't have surprised me if there hadn't been. —] 01:00, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::My bad. I meant "copy" to Commons, but thanks for clarifying. -- ] (]) 02:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * This reminds me of a similar problematic IP edit which I spotted in October, see ]. Did the other IP tag any keep local files which have been deleted? --] (]) 14:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *:No; their only deleted edits were to ], a scaled-down version of ] that was tagged as non-free. —] 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == BOOM Buster Deletion == | |||
| I'm the creator of the '']'' draft. I noticed that you stated that it wasn't confirmed that I made the request for the draft's deletion, so I intend to fix that. I've been meaning to talk to an administrator to delete the draft. ] (]) 01:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf == | |||
| Hi Explicit. You just deleted "File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf" per ], but it was shadowing ] uploaded by the same uploader under the same name. The Commons file was actually uploaded after the local file started being discussed at ] and concerns were raised about its licensing, but under a different license. Since you're also a Commons admin, perhaps you could advise on the best way to deal with the Commons file. ]? ]? -- ] (]) 11:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, thanks for pointing that out. I missed that the file was also on Commons. I've tagged it for lacking permission. ]] 11:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for taking a look at this. FWIW, I didn't notice it myself until after the local file had been deleted. -- ] (]) 21:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Michael Ruetz (1).jpg == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? It looks like the source for the image might be some kind of German commercial photo/press agency based on , but I'm not sure. -- ] (]) 07:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I tracked down the , where they cite "dpa/A3818 Klaus-Dietmar Gabbert" as the source. I can't determine if either of them are photo agencies. I did a quick spot check of other articles on the website and they use a mix of images from photo agencies and other sources. ]] 00:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for doing that. Do you think this is OK then per F7? -- ] (]) 00:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} This would still technically violate ]. While ] doesn't mention this directly (it really should), there is an implicit consensus that the recent death of an individual does not automatically grant a waiver for the replaceability aspect of policy. ]] 03:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Yes, it's implicitly assumed by many that the moment someone dies doesn't mean ] it met; a reasonable attempt still is expected to be made t find a free equivalent. Of course, just as many assume otherwise which is why you'll find non-free images sometimes being uploaded the same day some dies. There have numerous discussions about this at ], but they mostly end up getting nowhere because nobody can agree on the meaning of "reasonable attempt" or whether such an attempt is even necessary, and there are different ideas as to whether a bright-line time period after death should be specified or what it should be if one is specified. So, things are sort of stuck with the status quo where such images need to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. For many, the default is a non-free is OK in such cases until a free equivalent shows up regardless, even if there are F7b issues involved. Many, after all, still think "WP:NFC = fair use" and use the terms interchangeably even though that doesn't seem to have ever been intended to be the case or at least not the case since WP:NFCC became policy. -- ] (]) 05:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == C-SPAN screenshots == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Do you think there's any point in discussing ] at FFD or can they be tagged for speedy deletion per F3, F9 or F11? I don't see any way to convert their licensing to non-free per F7 and discussing such a thing is unlikely to change that. I'm sure they were uploaded in good faith, but they're not "PD-USGov" eligible works. -- ] (]) 01:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, the noncommercial disclaimer is a textbook violates of F3, so I have deleted them as such. ]] 03:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for looking at these. -- ] (]) 04:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == F3 again == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Would you mind watching ]. These file's most likely qualify for speedy deletion per F3, but I figured I give the uploader a chance to sort things out. If there's no response within a day or so, or they respond negatively, perhaps the files should be deleted per F3. -- ] (]) 07:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg == | |||
| ==DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' ''(pictured)'' became the youngest player in ]'s history at the age of 17 years, 9 months, and 6 days?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] ] 00:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{tlx|npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as ] uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- ] (]) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Arambegama == | |||
| ==New message from DreamRimmer== | |||
| I saw your edit on ] (as it is still listed as having dab pages), but it appears to have no content after your edit - should it be deleted?— ] <sup>]</sup> 21:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{talkback|User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts|ts=09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
| :{{Reply to|Rodw}} {{Done}}. ]] 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| – ] <small>(])</small> 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Marcus Younis== | ||
| *{{Ping|Explicit}}, Can you allow creation of ] now? He now plays for PSV and has new sources , , , and etc. Thanks, ] (]) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Could I please have a copy of ] (which you deleted), as I had only recently added a photo to it. ] (]) 00:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to| |
::{{Reply to|Das osmnezz}} I have removed the page protection. ]] 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == |
== You've got mail == | ||
| {{You've got mail|dashlesssig=] (]) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
| Why is ] deleted? I have already altered the non-free use rationale to comply with the guidelines? ''']''' <small>(])</small> 00:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marcnut1996}} I have restored the image. If {{U|Iruka13}} wishes to pursue it further, they should go to ]. ]] 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:07, 20 January 2025
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Deleted articles
Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, and Gottlieb Fluhmann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Question and advice regarding Moe's Southwest Grill logo
Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Misplaced Pages-stored image of File:Moes logo.png on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Misplaced Pages under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Dumbdora3729.jpg
When deleting files per WP:F8, please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced WP:NFCC#3b version. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: I have uploaded the higher resolution. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{npd}} works in this case. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like here). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail WP:FREER since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in Weaver Popcorn Company#Pop Weaver most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Jay Estiquita.jpg
Could you also take a look at File:Jay Estiquita.jpg? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. File:OctoArtsFilms2017.jpg looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about File:MTRCBSPG2012.gif. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! gidonb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg
File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as File:In Cuttack -- late '90s rev.jpg uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
New message from DreamRimmer
Message added 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
– DreamRimmer (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Marcus Younis
- @Explicit:, Can you allow creation of Marcus Younis now? He now plays for PSV and has new sources , , , and etc. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Das osmnezz: I have removed the page protection. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Thesazh (talk) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)